Slashdot Mirror


Palantir Knows Everything About You (bloomberg.com)

Palantir, a data-mining company created by Peter Thiel, is aiding government agencies by tracking American citizens using the War on Terror, Bloomberg reports. From the report: The company's engineers and products don't do any spying themselves; they're more like a spy's brain, collecting and analyzing information that's fed in from the hands, eyes, nose, and ears. The software combs through disparate data sources -- financial documents, airline reservations, cellphone records, social media postings -- and searches for connections that human analysts might miss. It then presents the linkages in colorful, easy-to-interpret graphics that look like spider webs.

[...] The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services uses Palantir to detect Medicare fraud. The FBI uses it in criminal probes. The Department of Homeland Security deploys it to screen air travelers and keep tabs on immigrants. Police and sheriff's departments in New York, New Orleans, Chicago, and Los Angeles have also used it, frequently ensnaring in the digital dragnet people who aren't suspected of committing any crime.

111 comments

  1. And? by zippo01 · · Score: 2

    This is not news. The us government is tracking anything and everything. They might have a hard time noise vs signal, but they are collecting, watching, listening, refining methods and tools. If you think otherwise, I at least hope the ignorance is bliss.

    1. Re: And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      palantir isn't the government. they sell access to data to the government.

    2. Re: And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what, that makes no sense?

    3. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA should stop pretending it is any better than China or Russia

    4. Re: And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it's a private company. they sell info to government agencies that those agencies cannot collect themselves either for lack of resources or legal restrictions

    5. Re: And? by kalieaire · · Score: 1

      dood, they're a software company. their product is like microsoft excel.

      people who buy the software actually need to input data into it.

      if you're saying palantir sells data to the government, then basically any application that employs a database to store and distribute data is selling information to the government, including microsoft or any operating system or application for that matter.

      I don't think you know how life works.

    6. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we get it. You're super smart and informed so anything that might raise awareness among the commoners isn't news and doesn't deserve to be published.

    7. Re: And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palantir doesnâ(TM)t collect data the Summary is misleading.

      Itâ(TM)s government agencies collect everything about you and pump it into Palantir..... so Palantir knows everything about you because it takes all that data and try to make sense of it....

      Yes Palantir is an analytics platform thatâ(TM)s it.

      Itâ(TM)s like saying R knows everything about you because every other company also uses R for analytics.

    8. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not news. The us government is tracking anything and everything. They might have a hard time noise vs signal, but they are collecting, watching, listening, refining methods and tools. If you think otherwise, I at least hope the ignorance is bliss.

      Agreed this new one isn't the problem. The problem is we seem to have no rights to stop this and there seems no movement of sufficient momentum to get such rights.

      Had this exact problem existed at the time the constitution was drawn, I think the right to be protected against unauthorized searches and seizures would apply to this crap.

      They literally gather every drop of data about you they can get their hands on, and their ability to do so only increases as time passes.

      It sure as hell sounds like an unauthorized search, but it is okay since that information wasn't stolen from your desk or personal computer directly? I think not...

    9. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're giving the feds a bit much credit. Never underestimate the power of bureaucracy to not do things that are possible, productive, and efficient.

      Moreover, your point is salient because this particular software sounds like...a database. Those have been around for a while now.

    10. Re: And? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      yawn.

  2. No, they don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have secrets that I will take to my grave and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. Does that make you ANGRY, Palantir? xD xD xD

    1. Re:No, they don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your grave you say?" says Skynet (nee Palantir).

    2. Re:No, they don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new I.T. closet cleaner grave overlord.

    3. Re:No, they don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nee FaceBook

    4. Re:No, they don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use Facebook, you faggot, or any other social media. I don't have a cellphone either, and I don't ever use my real name online, anywhere. Where is your surveillance god now?

    5. Re: No, they don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worthless link

    6. Re: No, they don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are using slashdot, the web, you drive, your friends tag you on Facebook. Thanks for coming out.

  3. Yo Dawg I Heard you like Taxpayers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Palantir began work with the LAPD in 2009. The impetus was federal funding."

    So I took taxpayer money to spy on taxpayers while skirting taxpayer laws.

  4. Right to remove by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    If a company has no relation to you, business, personal, or otherwise, then by law you should be able to order them to remove all data from there system that pertains to you.

    Even better they shouldn't be allowed to keep it in the first place.

    Even then all data after 7 years should have a sunset clause and be required to be removed.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If a company has no relation to you, business, personal, or otherwise, then by law you should be able to order them to remove all data from there system that pertains to you.

      Even better they shouldn't be allowed to keep it in the first place.

      Even then all data after 7 years should have a sunset clause and be required to be removed.

      does this also apply to newspapers or will you insist that they scrub all of their birth announcements from the past?

    2. Re:Right to remove by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am interested to see how you would enforce that.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Right to remove by jwhyche · · Score: 1

      I am interested to see how you would enforce that.

      I'm open to suggestions.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    4. Re:Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah good luck with that

    5. Re:Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OBVIOUSLY a blockchain solution.

    6. Re:Right to remove by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Well, to make sure, you would have to run the entire facility through a shredder, along with every device that ever connected to them through their WAN port. For the staff, you'll need a flashy thingy. That should buy you some time until the next guy pops up.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Right to remove by TooManyNames · · Score: 1

      They said, "should."

      Everyone knows that whatever follows means, "in my ideal reality ..." Oh, and there are never any unforeseen consequences that arise from the "should" either.

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
    8. Re:Right to remove by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Move to Europe. The laws have been on the books for some time, are regularly enforced and are about to get even stricter.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    9. Re:Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll get started on an ICO for that today.

    10. Re:Right to remove by mikael · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember USENET and Kibo? You just had to mention his name on a USENET discussion board and he would appear. Turns out that the company he worked for was logging every post ever made. Eventually those archives were made public.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just 1 ETH gets you 10.000 of these !

    12. Re:Right to remove by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Fine the companies that refuse to do it? Audit the data companies have?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    13. Re:Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A beowulf cluster of blockchains?

    14. Re:Right to remove by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Totally inadequate. You can only verify what they let you see. But it would help if the individual had real subpoena power over their own data. We have to at least make the flow go both ways.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    15. Re: Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use net was a store and forward network. Everyone using it (except all those AOLians and the periodic newbies every September revolution) knew that posts were retained and globally visible. Long retention times on a usenet server were considered a good thing.

    16. Re:Right to remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, if this is not a Government-owned/operated company, what business does the Government have in providing MY personal information to them?
      They should have to ask for my permission first before giving my personal information to a private company.
      I think a lawsuit is needed here.

  5. It's right there in the name of the company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet everyone saw this coming.

    Get it? Saw?

    I'll see myself out.

  6. US Coastline by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 4, Funny

    But does it know the length of the US Coastline?

    1. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or the airspeed of an unladen swallow?

    2. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or the airspeed of an unladen swallow?

      What do you mean? An African or European swallow?

    3. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An African or European swallow?

    4. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to ask Trump after Putin zipped up.

    5. Re:US Coastline by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      But does it know why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So funny and original. You must write for Stephen Colbert.

    7. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it know the length of the US Coastline?

      Length, yes. Units, no.

    8. Re:US Coastline by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    9. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I LOL'ed.

      Your butthurt is delicious, altrightfag.

    10. Re:US Coastline by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Who cares about that geography stuff? Does it know many licks it takes to get to the chocolately Tootsie-Roll centre of a Tootsie-Pop?

      Get your priorities straight, man.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    11. Re:US Coastline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My side isn't butthurt, cupcake. We won, remember?

  7. What happens with erroneous data? by Visarga · · Score: 1

    If Palantir has wrong information on someone won't that make this person a victim of the state? How are decisions made on data collected by various shady deals, when we don't know if the data is correct?

    1. Re:What happens with erroneous data? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      The key thing here is that if this thing's algorithms kept secret, then it could be cited falsely in witch hunts. As much as this stinks, we need an open source project to bankrupt this commercial interest.

    2. Re:What happens with erroneous data? by mikael · · Score: 1

      It would be used to check out possible links. If Agent Black is known to make calls to Pizza Hut, they have to check out whether that is a false front for deliveries or whether it's just a pizza order.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:What happens with erroneous data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why everyone should set up an autodialer and chat-bot to dial random numbers in Russia, China, the ME, etc etc. Poison the data.

  8. What does it know about Hulk Hogan that we don't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or for that matter, Peter Thiel.

    Captcha: puckers

  9. You missed to mention another important use case: by ffkom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next totalitarian government will use it to dispose of dissidents before they can group into any sizeable opposition.

  10. Your privacy isn't. by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    I guess you'd be labeled a terrorist threat if you started posting incorrect information.

    Things like instead of removing photo EXIF information, geotagging it with places like Greenland or Antarctica.

    Posting fake updates on facebook/linkedin with new jobs, or actually accepting friend requests from the bots. Posting on instagram rumors and liking some of the crazier people.

  11. a big net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its all fun and games until you start posting shit online that particular power structures don't like.

    don't blow this off and say it doesn't concern you: everyone with an opinion is at risk.

  12. WHATCHA GONNA DOOOOO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHEN PALANTIR KNOWS EVERYTHING ABOUT YOUUUU

    BROTHER

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  13. Ugh, no thanks by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I tried Palantir once - but all I saw were a pair of old hands, withering in flame.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Ugh, no thanks by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      I tried Palantir once - but all I saw were a pair of old hands, withering in flame.

      I'm pretty sure at one point I used something called Palantir which was an apache webcam app for linux which I used to monitor and switch between my home cameras remotely.

    2. Re:Ugh, no thanks by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      I tried Palantir once - but all I saw were a pair of old hands, withering in flame.

      I'm pretty sure at one point I used something called Palantir which was an apache webcam app for linux which I used to monitor and switch between my home cameras remotely.

      Ok here it is, last update was around 2012:

      http://www.fastpath.it/product...

    3. Re:Ugh, no thanks by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Fool of a Took.

  14. For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a man who claims to be a Libertarian, Peter Thiel is awfully willing to help authoritarians ruin people's lives and abuse their power. Even if you 100% believe in the US justice system (I don't), this software is probably for sale to China, Burma, Saudi, and a whole bunch of other repressive regimes.

    1. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Sperbels · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These days, Libertarianism just means Plutocracy.

    2. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes perfect sense according to Noam Chomsky's interpretation of libertarianism.

    3. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of these "freedom people" really only believe in their own, or their tribe's freedom and are more than happy to use their freedoms to curtail yours.

    4. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thiel thinks that as a Libertarian, he should be free to sell his services to authoritarians and the government shouldn't be able to stop him. I'm not sure what a Libertarian stands for other than "I think I should be able to do whatever I want, and fuck you over to the largest degree you're unable to stop me." Except for with physical violence, because most Libertarians tend to be physically incapable of defending themselves.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by whoever57 · · Score: 0

      Libertarian really means: "fuck you, I've got mine", with a side of "let's create an idea to reel in some suckers who will tirelessly work to maintain the plutocracy".

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Kjella · · Score: 1, Troll

      Libertarian && Rich = I got mine so screw you. It's amazing how many people think a "fair" world is one where they're better off, it's like 90% think they're above average drivers.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For a man who claims to be a Libertarian, Peter Thiel is awfully willing to help authoritarians ruin people's lives and abuse their power. Even if you 100% believe in the US justice system (I don't), this software is probably for sale to China, Burma, Saudi, and a whole bunch of other repressive regimes.

      I think that libertarians are self centered, so his self interest is best served by selling us out. I think libertarians are the right wing version of communists - it sounds OK in certain narrow situations but doesn't scale.

    8. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicon Valley is crawling with fakeass libertarians. Freedom or fiefdom? If one desires the former, they may be a libertarian, but if they desire the latter, they most definitely are not.

      Peter Thiel desires fiefdom, and to declare himself lord. He is not a libertarian. He is an enemy of libertarians.

    9. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True libertarianism always ends up at authoritarianism. When people are free without government restriction to take part in a "free market" or "free other system" there will always be a select few who are better at gaming these systems than all the rest. Out of those select few, there will always be at least one who is willing to destroy the others to ensure their supreme authoritarian status. This is no different than what we learn in evolutionary theory about other animal hierarchies. The difference is that blue footed boobies and snow leopards can't create systems to track their competitions every move, wage intercontinental warfare, and ultimately destroy the whole earth with nukes.

    10. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarian when it comes to how he and his buisness is treated. Complete totalitarianism for everyone else.

    11. Re:For a man who claims to be a Libertarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please shut your fucking hole, Alex Jones wanna be.

  15. Re:You missed to mention another important use cas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove progressive scum ? They're the stain, we're the bleach.

  16. Used to work there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting place. Lots of nice people.

  17. Don't forget guns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone worried about "background checks = feds coming for my guns" should consider that hundreds of big data firms already know how many guns you have when people talk about closing loopholes. And if they don't, you're certainly not posting on /. Hats off to your primitive cabin resourcefulness, you off-grid woodspeople who will never see this!

  18. Tolkien reference by Quantum+gravity · · Score: 0

    The word Palantir must come from Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. They were stones with which one could communicate with anyone looking into another Palantir. The largest could evesdrop on the others.

    1. Re:Tolkien reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, of course, they were tools of the bad guys.

  19. no suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jewish billionaire is a sociopathic weirdo stalker, maybe someone should set a site up to track these douchebags, where does he live ? where does he eat?, where are his children/wife?, what are his car registrations?, what time does he leave his house ?

    if you have nothing to hide egh ?

  20. Thiel is a Brownshirt faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should be killed on site.

  21. No need for Snowden or Manning by plague911 · · Score: 2

    Palantir is proof that any one who was "shocked" by what Snowden etc "revealed" are idiots and/or uninformed. Planitir was around for years before the leakers and they were very very public about telling the world that this kind of data mining was ubiquitous. We never needed the drama queens to spill the beans, any of the concept we're public for a long time. All they did was reveal some details which compromised some poor field agents and got them killed.

    1. Re:No need for Snowden or Manning by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      any one who was "shocked" by what Snowden etc "revealed" are idiots and/or uninformed.

      You're a dipshit.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    2. Re:No need for Snowden or Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who was killed as a result of the leaks from Snowden or Manning?

      So what you are saying is that there was no value to the details that Snowden or Manning provided to the mass media. Maybe if you are a tech head and kept up to date on what was occurring in this space you understood the implications of what Palantir was doing, but I can pretty much guarantee you that most people, including journalists, did not understand. Regardless.. who the fuck was filled by Snowden's or Manning's revelations?

  22. Fuck it by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Peter Thiel is a piece of shit. Stick that in your database Palantir and fuck yourself with it.

    1. Re:Fuck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure showed him.

    2. Re: Fuck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, Trump Eunuch.

  23. Palantir - InfoSec Leader or New Kid on the Block? by kalieaire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Agreed, HP, IBM, Oracle has had identity management suites that do this for a while now.  Analyst's Notebook was picked up by IBM and does nearly the same thing.  The Army's bigger System DCGS also does this but on a greater scale aka TIA (Total Information Awareness) Was based on Analyst's Notebook and Lockheed's Information Sharing Environment solution.  If you look at LE (Law Enforcement) use cases, they're totally dominated by Microsoft's Power BI (Business Intelligence) or Data Integration platforms similar to SoftwareAG.  The only reason you don't hear anything about these guys is because they create a platform so large and pervasive that Journalists can't wrap their heads around how big data works.

    Palantir is today's buzz word, and they're getting tons of free advertising from these muckrack[tm] journalists.  It makes you wonder if the Journalists are being paid by sponsors to hype up these companies to make them into not just a big name in Data Analysis, but a household name.  Next thing you know, Slack, Mattersmost, Discord, and Twitch are going to be dragged through the muck.

    * https://blogs.microsoft.com/firehose/2016/03/04/how-predictive-analytics-can-help-law-enforcement-fight-crime/
    * http://www1.softwareag.com/corporate/images/SAG_Terracotta_US_Law_Enforcement_RS_Mar16_WEB_tcm16-107904.pdf
    * https://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2017/03/16/lockheed-cyber-crime-contract.aspx
    * http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/crimefighting/

    Either these journalists are under someone's dime, or they're really really misinformed.

    Look at Discord, they just made $50 mill today:

    * https://discordapp.com/privacy
    ** Developers: Developers using our SDK or API will have access to their end users’ information, including message content, message metadata, and voice metadata. Developers must use such information only to provide the SDK/API functionality within their applications and/or services.

  24. From my Bag of Quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Benjamin Franklin: "Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

  25. and-- by WolfgangVL · · Score: 2

    Comcast knows everything about you.
    Verizon knows everything about you.
    Comcast knows everything about you.
    IRS knows everything about you.
    Google knows everything about you.
    Facebook knows everything about you.
    Uber knows everything about you.
    Grocery stores know everything about you.
    Credit agencies know everything about you.

    I can go all day.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:and-- by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Burma Shave

    2. Re:and-- by DCFusor · · Score: 2

      They don't quite. Couldn't get a MySSA acct with the gov because equifax and experian don't have a record of me - I don't use credit and the SSA, though they send me checks, can't set up an online account because - and THEY TOLD ME ON THE PHONE - without a credit rating they can't verify I exist, much less am me. Other than that, it's fun being a "ghost".

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    3. Re:and-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. I just went through this myself. You can still get a MySSA account, they send you a letter to your physical address with a passcode.

  26. Don't forget rentseeking and welfare for the rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and the shaft for the poor.

    Go read up on liberland and discuss.seasteading.org for examples. Or y'know any Conservative website 'Libertarians in name only' frequent.

  27. You expect diff. from a jew brainwashing you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read and KNOW your true enemies: Khazar Talmudic Jews believe this of all they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were these nations banishing them a lie? Argentines in 1940 under Peron, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms, Spanish inquistion & Spain 1492 and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above. Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud. This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also + the Essenes could not stand them either breaking away from the pharisee corruption):

    Mark Zuckerberg who STOLE facebook's code from the Winklevoss twins (who dusted him in court on it) calling his users "DUMB FUCKS" & spied on his collegiate classmates via 'fakebook', home of bots and spying/tracking you, now in court FRYING (rightfully so). He also PAID OFF the courts (by political contributions like Jew PACS do) on the MAJORITY of the council judges there. He STILL had to apologize!

    Maria Abramovic satanist spirit cooker pal of Hillary Clinton the Voodoo queen is a jew https://www.google.com/search?...

    Like Hillary Clinton's mentor Saul Alinsky author of rules for radicals book dedicated to Lucifer

    John Podesta Hillary's pal again, is another JUDE with a pedophile brother (both = satanists too imo).

    "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer â" so I wasnâ(TM)t lying â" and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much aliveâ Harold Rosenthal http://www.thetruthseeker.co.u...

    Jewish rabbi openly admits to satan worship use white children's blood they kill for passover bread (which THIS video covers in detail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU8Y1743QoY/ & how they ran the black slave trade + how they say a prayer to KILL US ALL (goyim) during passover), infiltrating and subverting the catholic church, creating the Jesuit order https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    or https://www.youtube.com/watch?... too!

    Barbara Spectre, a jew, tells everyone it's jews orchestrating the muslim migrant problem in Europe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ/ . No migrant raping of women in Poland. Tons in Sweden. Do the math. Use common-sense. This is to get muslims and other goyim/gentiles to wipe one another out as incompatible cultures that will clash and always have.

    Rabbi A. Finkelstein ADMITS their greatest enemies are ARABS and WHITES (blacks too) whom they wish to kill one another in a 'theater of war' which they find AMUSING https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Finkelstein also admits JEWS DID 9/11 (perpetrated by the Mossad & Bebe Netanyahu of ISRAEL) https:/

  28. clickbait by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Agreed, it's not news. But an article that manages to mention Thiel, War on Terror, collecting personal information, FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and illegal immagrants is clickbait gold.

  29. Mostly shows Denethor Burning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to be really strong willed to use it at all let alone wisely.

  30. Re:You missed to mention another important use cas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another NAZI makes his true colors known.

  31. Have some decency by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    the man has to eat...

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  32. $100k says they dont know dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even FB is wrong about me. All of these tech companies vastly overstate their abilities.

  33. Re:Palantir - InfoSec Leader or New Kid on the Blo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have avoided journalistic scrutiny because the founders of those companies have not publicly supported or worked with Trump.
    But if your company does the same things as those other companies, and your executives are publicly pro-Trump? You gonna get journalistically investigated.

  34. They don't know everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh huh.
    They _don't_ know where Jim Gray is, which means they don't know everything about everybody.
    Besides, Thiel is a head-freezer, which means he's batsh!t crazy....

  35. Powered by Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    99% of this data comes from Facebook.

  36. Triggered by Noam Chomsky reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should check out his book, manufacturing consent.

    1. Re:Triggered by Noam Chomsky reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I encourage others see the post you troll as you don't invalidate its content. Impossible as it is fact jews supply. I took a few hours today to verify its content out of curiousity. I learned much I had no clue of before. It is spot on. You must be one of the jews that don't want it seen in my opinion. I don't blame you but you do it to yourselves. You're going to get Zyklon B and furnaces probably since you don't learn from your constant historical mistakes you have made for millenia and you can't get over your delusions of "superiority" but if you are so superior? Why can't you accept yourselves? You cut your noses off in plastic surgery and try straighten your hair which tells me that you wish you were goy actually. I pity you. You expect others to accept you when you can't even accept your natural hooknosed selves and it is clear from the nosejobs alone that you know you are not. Others dislike you when you wish them dead or raped or robbed. Don't you get it? That makes you stupid! Your book of law the talmud states things that make the rest of humanity shun you and many sources verify it as fact. In my estimation, that is how jews have destroyed themselves through history.

  37. Re:You missed to mention another important use cas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken like a true fascist.

    Or something. Back when, National Socialism didn't get popular because it wanted to kill all the jews. That, along with another people killing program, came later and basically ended up with a life of its own. Nazism got popular because it offered the population something it badly wanted but hadn't been able to get: A way out of trouble. And they were in deeply depressing desperate doo-doo back then.

    Fascism, by the by, similar story. It didn't have a bad name then, that came later.

    Now, of course, "nazi" and "fascist", along with a number of other slurs, are the staple of the post-fact inclusivity diversity progressive discourse. There's barely any content in there, but lots of non-progressive shaming.

    And yeah, I too think that the progressive ideology has gone bust at least thirty years ago, but we're not allowed to say it. Anyone who does gets shunned, called racist, "islamophobic", xenophobic, or any number of other bad words. If you look closely it becomes quite obvious that there's almost never any rebuttals on content, but always attacks on the person. Like you're doing here. It's how the progressives cling to power.

  38. Very libertarian by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    Libertarians like Peter Thiel keeps proving my adage right: libertarians are just monarchs waiting to happen.

    Libertarians only want freedom for themselves, and at the expense of other people if they can help it.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  39. I Don't Think So by cstacy · · Score: 1

    Palantir isn't collecting data on you, the Government and corporations do that.

      Palantir is a software company who makes an integrated, modular system for data integration and analysis (such as link analysis). They don't collect the data -- they sell the software to entities who have data feeds that need to be analyzed. (However, Palantir does provide consultants to work on-site with the customers to help use and customize the software.)

    About a decade ago when Palantir was brand new, I recommended them to certain military customers I was working for; it was an excellent product! Some people hate the company (because it is fashionable to hate them in some circles). They got a lot of "hype", because they actually delivered useful software that solved problems. Imagine that! I have never had any connection to the company other than telling my clients that they should become customers (users). Worked out very well and the clients were ecstatic with the results. I have heard that not every one of their customers was as happy, for whatever reason. Your milage may vary, I guess.

    It was largely written in Java, and was all about pluggable and customizable modules for data management: taking feeds, cleaning/loading, and lots of modules for various kinds of analysis. Haven't seen Palantir in years, but I would be surprised if by now they didn't have AI/ML goodies, and probably (wildly guessing here) good interfaces for Python, too.

  40. Re:You missed to mention another important use cas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest learning more about history, as you are somewhat off base. Michael Burleigh would be a good place to start.

  41. Re:You missed to mention another important use cas by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 2

    The next totalitarian government will use it to dispose of dissidents before they can group into any sizeable opposition.

    They already do - see PRNK, China, Russia, Iran ....