Slashdot Mirror


Can Tesla's Batteries Power Puerto Rico? (electrek.co)

An anonymous reader quotes Electrek: Almost 1 million ratepayers of the Puerto Rican Electric Power Authority on the island of Puerto Rico were reportedly without power Wednesday during an island-wide blackout. But a few hundred locations with Tesla Energy storage systems were able to keep the lights on, according to CEO Elon Musk... Some of those locations include very critical services. For example, Tesla deployed a series of Powerpack systems on the Puerto Rican islands of Vieques and Culebra for a sanitary sewer treatment plant, the Arcadia water pumping station, the Ciudad Dorada elderly community, the Susan Centeno hospital, and the Boys and Girls Club of Vieques. Furthermore, the automaker's energy division also deployed a solar+battery system at a hospital in Puerto Rico...

It was also reported that the Puerto Rican government was considering Tesla's plan for a series of microgrids to help bring back power on a larger scale. The government has confirmed that they "presented several projects in remote areas that would allow entire communities to be more independent" and they also "presented a proposal to the Authority for Public-Private Partnerships for the deployment of a large-scale battery system designed to help stabilize the entire Puerto Rico electricity network."

The proposal, involving de-centralized local solar farms, "should prove more resilient to natural disaster," Electrek reported earlier, adding " and of course, it would be a lot cleaner than their currently mostly fossil fuel-based power generation." Already Tesla batteries are "live and delivering power" at 662 locations, Elon Musk tweeted Wednesday.

Meanwhile, CNN reports that one Puerto Rico resident spent three weeks building his own solar power system using $7,500 in parts -- which will ultimately prove cheaper than the $350 a month he was spending to run a gas generator (and waiting as long as six hours in the long gas lines).

They're not revealing his name "because he's concerned someone may try to steal his new system."

88 comments

  1. Re:No by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Please tell us how you would do it for less -- paying for kit at Puerto Rican prices.

  2. Power Puerto Rico? by riverat1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course they can't power Puerto Rico because they require generation in order to be charged. What they can do though is increase the resilience of the power system by making the frequent power disruptions less of a problem and reduce the cost of power by smoothing out the intermittent nature of less expensive solar and wind systems. Right now PR is heavily dependent on diesel and fuel oil power generation which is one of most expensive ways to generate electricity.

    1. Re:Power Puerto Rico? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they can't power Puerto Rico because they require generation in order to be charged.

      If the batteries with solar chargers can't power things, how have the main hospitals using exactly that been running 24/7 off grid since tesla installed their solar panels and batteries?

      Isn't that claim a bit like saying cars can't take you anywhere because they require gas?

    2. Re:Power Puerto Rico? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Of course I was being pedantic. But yes, a car can't take you anywhere without fuel. Notice the example of batteries you gave included solar panels to charge them.

    3. Re:Power Puerto Rico? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      You're pedantically conflating "power" and "generation".

      Why? Because you think people don't understand that batteries don't generate infinite power by themselves? Great point. Thanks for educating us.

      I'll get right on suing everyone that uses the phrase "battery powered" for false advertising.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  3. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't do it, for more, I wouldn't do it for less; I wouldn't do it PERIOD. The Puerto Ricans need to be looking after themselves. THEY need to be the ones innovating. THEY need to be designing their iwn completely novel power grid rather than getting a bailout every time something goes wrong. They must make themselves self-sufficient rather than subordinate to the mainland taxpayers. If they can't do this, what value are they to themselves?

  4. Guess I was right, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    sort of. Didn't realize that Tesla was already on the job there. I particularly like the plan to build microgrids. It would be good if some other companies got involved though.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Guess I was right, by harperska · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be good if some other companies got involved in most things that Tesla does.

    2. Re:Guess I was right, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Microgrids are no better than macro grids when they are totally destroyed by a storm. Bury power lines and you don't need a 'microgrid'. I wonder if you even can define what you think a 'microgrid' is.

    3. Re:Guess I was right, by riverat1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In a total micogrid there's the example of a Puerto Rican flower farmer who installed solar panels several years ago. After Hurricane Maria he was still in operation with most of his solar panels still in operational condition so he could run his well pumps.

      How solar energy saved a Puerto Rican farm from Hurricane Maria

    4. Re:Guess I was right, by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      The new model the distributed suburban power station is likely the way to go. Basically put a full array of solar panels over every domestic roof, with double the size battery pack required for each property. So houses produce more energy than they need, with half the battery pack to supply them and half the battery pack to out energy back into the grid (for commercial and medium density housing). So the power station is already built and it just needs the generators, solar panels, and the storage system for out of solar hours power. Some will buy, some will lease and some will just provide access to their roof for the electric suppliers system and just buy supply for a discount. The idea, to get every roof generating electricity in an entirely distributed power generation, storage and supply system.

      Of course some big players are blocking everything they can, with a single focus on buying up properties cheap after driving out the local population.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  5. Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Power Packs are nice. I worry about PREPAs ability to do long term maintenance on a lot of microgrids. I would also worry about their ability to pay for the replacement of Power Pack cells/ and whole Power Packs when they go bad. This utility was already struggling to replace simple stuff before the hurricane. The utility still needs to get power generation figured out, and Power Packs are another cost to add on to everything.

    Admittedly a big plus to these is customers in the microgrid "won't lose power", but these just make the grid more complicated for a company that can't currently repair it's current equipment.

    1. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ever try keeping a gas turbine plant running? Not so simple. Or cheap. Solar cell / battery plants are quite a bit easier to maintain than 30 foot tall jet engines.

      Both do require access to high tech manufacturing and support but especially for a small island, solar / wind / battery combos seem to make quite a bit more sense than fossil fuel thermal plants. Right now, solar / wind / battery systems are equal priced to cheaper than thermal plants at the small sizes we're talking about in PV.

      One of the big issues with power in PV is that the generation facilities are sited on the other side of the island from most of the the users. That requires expensive and fragile transmission lines (that still haven't been completely fixed). Small scale solar / wind /battery sited where the demand is makes a whole lot more sense than what they are doing now.

      Putting a bunch of panels and batteries in a local field is quite a bit easier for locals to agree to than a brand new steam belching, noisy thermal plant.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever try keeping a gas turbine plant running? Not so simple. Or cheap.

      Solar thermal uses turbines and can function after sundown. Reflectors are cheaper, more durable and easier to produce. In case of emergency same turbines can be used to burn natural gas. Neat baseline combo on industrial scale. Not that I am against solar cells.

    3. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by dprimary · · Score: 2

      I deal with UPS's as well. Not really the same thing as the utility batteries. UPS's have not changed much in decades. Most of them still use lead acid batteries. They don't last very long even when maintained. When looking at the cost, size, weight, maintenance and reliability I have to question why we keep doing it the same way with UPS's.

    4. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Ever try keeping a gas turbine plant running? Not so simple. Or cheap. Solar cell / battery plants are quite a bit easier to maintain than 30 foot tall jet engines.

      30ft tall jet engines? I think you've never tried to do maintenance on a solar system that big either. You're talking about two different levels of scale. Little microturbines on the other hand seem to require a similar level of maintenance as a typical house gas hot water system.

    5. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The only 'microtubines' I'm familiar with are model airplane/helicopter turbines. They are not cheap or low maintenance.

      Got a cite?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Making things that fly, compared to similar things that don't, means they're more fragile because they have to be lighter and more complicated because they need to be more efficient? I can't believe nobody spotted that.

      Man, it's a pity there isn't a Nobel prize for engineering.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Are your UPS batteries lead-acid? If so they take tons more maintenance than Li-ion batteries. I don't think the situation is comparable.

    8. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I still don't have a cite for the existence of such micro CTs.

      I don't think they exist. Closest is aircraft APUs, but as you indirectly get at, those are uneconomical on the ground, where their light weight isn't an advantage

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by samwichse · · Score: 1

      I think he's talking about these:
      https://www.capstoneturbine.co...

    10. Re:Bad idea if only for long term maintenance by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      On point. Those clearly don't: 'require a similar level of maintenance as a typical house gas hot water system' Which was the original claim.

      Also on point: 26% thermal efficiency. Useless unless you need the waste heat for a large building.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Re:Leftism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Your education is merely an underrepresented and overtaxed territory of your failures in life.

  7. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now try the same statement, but substitute âoePuerto Ricansâ for âoeTexansâ, âoeFloridiansâ, or âoeianâ(TM)sâ

  8. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the power goes out in Florida, no one expects a bailout. Volunteers, citizens, and the power company handle things nicely. You should move from Commiefornia and spend a few years in Florida. Things are closer to reality here.

  9. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes zero sense. The government of Puerto Rico is looking for a solution to the power problem, so they are looking after themselves.

    Besides, I'm pretty sure that they have learned that they cannot expect anything good from mainland USA a long time ago.

  10. Third world thieves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They're not revealing his name "because he's concerned someone may try to steal his new system."

    This is a common problem in the third world. Doesn't matter how much infrastructure one puts up. It's one's capacity to keep people from stealing it, that's important.

    1. Re:Third world thieves. by mikael · · Score: 1

      It sucks when you put up an electric distribution system, only to have the transformers raided for their cooking oil.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Third world thieves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      >This is a common problem in the third world. Doesn't matter how much infrastructure one puts up. It's one's capacity to keep people from stealing it, that's important.

      in the USA, it's the rich people who steal the infrastructure

    3. Re:Third world thieves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's your knee jerk unsubstantiated idiocy, right on time.

    4. Re:Third world thieves. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      raided for their cooking oil

      But... free PCB's!

    5. Re: Third world thieves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck rich people!

      (typed on technology and infrastructure created by rich people)

    6. Re:Third world thieves. by riverat1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It happens in the USA too. How often have you heard about thieves digging up copper wire or other things for the scrap metal?

    7. Re:Third world thieves. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Whataboutism is a propaganda technique first used by the Soviet Union, in its dealings with the Western world.[1] When Cold War criticisms were levelled at the Soviet Union, the response would be "What about..." followed by the naming of an event in the Western world.[2][3] It represents a case of tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy),[4] a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position, without directly refuting or disproving the opponent's initial argument.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Third world thieves. by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, I wasn't trying to downplay the third world thievery, just pointing out it's not unheard of in the USA. It's certainly a much bigger problem elsewhere.

    9. Re:Third world thieves. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Sure you were trying to downplay third world thievery. It's the whole point of using whataboutism in the first place. "Don't you Americans dare to think that you might be better than third world shitholes!" is not exactly an uncommon thought among your tribe these days. In fact, it's very common to say that we Americans are worse than third world shitholes and you'd rather have their people as immigrants than us. Sad that you hate your own people so much, but that's where we are.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:Third world thieves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making a mountain out of a molehill is an idiom referring to over-reactive, histrionic behaviour where a person makes too much of a minor issue. It seems to have come into existence in the 16th century.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_a_mountain_out_of_a_molehill

    11. Re:Third world thieves. by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      I guess I should have included a trigger warning for you. I sorry to have offended your delicate sensibilities. (Not really.)

    12. Re:Third world thieves. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I don't see how trigger warnings and safe spaces are incompatible with other social and global justice efforts. Safe spaces may seem trivial to you but they might mean the difference between life and death for a trans person studying in a small public college in the South. You may find trigger warnings to be unnecessary but they might save a rape survivor from having to watch a violent rape scene, which can be great teaching material for other students.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    13. Re:Third world thieves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article isn't about the third world. This is about the United States of America. By definition, not part of the third world.

  11. Anyone with own roof & discipline can go off-g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been off-grid for a few years now... A $5000(~1800W panels are now half the cost) system. Meets my power needs except for being in Canukistan, my heat. I have fridge/freezer/40" tv, computer/router/security system(24/7), lights,washer, microwave, electric pressure cooker, window AC unit, power tools, yada yada..
      It meets the basic needs, only.. I have a really crappy battery; $1500 for a new one(only get flooded, leadacid industrial 2500+-cycle life; by far best bang for buck)... But it's been fine for years, why? because of a change in attitude about using power.

      I can run my basics for 4-5 days off the battery and overcast alone(2KWh/day avg). But heres what I do.. When I want to use an electric chainsaw or other heavy tool, what do I do? I wait for the sun to come out! Nothing needs to be done immediately. For virtually everyone with their own roof/unobstructed sun, we could be off-grid now, solar now.. It's the regulations and forced 'technical workers and inspectors required in most states that drive the cost of solar through the roof.

    As usual, the government makes everything worse.

  12. Re:Anyone with own roof & discipline can go of by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's nice Mr. Aspy-in-the-woods. Try that in suburbia. Or, perish the thought, a city.

    You don't want them to come visit, do you? So you need to find a scalable solution. Yes, that's going to require cooperation but you can leave that to the extroverts.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  13. The big boys won't like that. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    'The proposal, involving de-centralized local solar farms, "should prove more resilient to natural disaster," '

    Not one bit!

  14. Re:Leftism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leftism from whom?

  15. Solar farm meets Cat 5 Hurricane by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    Yeah I can see that working out well. Oh that was decentralized solar farm ? Toss in transmission lines and it looks that much better.

    Puerto Rico is a perfect argument for small nukes 50 MW on sealed reactor that only needs to be refueled every few years perfect.

    1. Re:Solar farm meets Cat 5 Hurricane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As the FA mentions, there were in fact solar farms on the island this time around. They survived pretty well, with an estimated loss of 5% of the panels. Some transmission lines for redundancy never hurts, but a solar farm already has lots of redundancy built in.

  16. Re:No by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    Please tell us how you would do it for less -- paying for kit at Puerto Rican prices.

    Rebuild the existing infrastructure and use as much buried distribution as possible/affordable. There is no perfect solution, but when you factor in cost and time to recover there is little choice.

  17. Public-Private Partnerships by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nice how they slipped in the "Public-Private Partnerships" bit so nobody seems to be calling attention to it. Where I come from (UK), they're used to extract/extort tax-payer money out of the public and funnel it into private pockets. Sounds like Puerto Rico is rapidly turning into Puerto Pobre and Bancos Ricos.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  18. No, they can only store power. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The actual power would have to come from somewhere else. I suggest clean and healthy coal power!

  19. Re:Anyone with own roof & discipline can go of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual, the government makes everything worse.

    You should move to Russia. Weather is similar to Canukistan. It must be this Putin guy that makes everything work without government up (down?) there. Otherwise how did he get elected 5 terms in a row?

  20. Hahahah. Shtawp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can run my basics for 4-5 days off the battery and overcast alone(2KWh/day avg)

    Come peek usage at the height of summer, I use 100kWh per day.

    That's not gonna fit on my rooftop. I'll need half an acre of panels, for quite the princely sum. Then of course there is storage. I can't imagine what 300kWh+ worth of batteries would be.

    InB4 some Euro-fag tries to paint me as an excessive consumer because their postage stamp apartment, without air conditioning, doesn't use a fraction of that. STFU peasants!

    1. Re:Hahahah. Shtawp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does continually inflating and deflating your mom, sister, wife, and daughter take that much energy? Even if they are the same doll with just different colors lipstick, so you can enjoy your rainbow parties?

    2. Re: Hahahah. Shtawp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody with a nail gun needs to 'upgrade' your condensor coils this summer, so you can join us in fucking reality for at least a week or two. Cut some windows in that McMansion and tet the world in.

    3. Re:Hahahah. Shtawp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the peak of summer, there's also sunlight for a lot more of the day. Assuming the 4.16 KW rate you mention, and assuming 250 Watts per solar panel, a quick search finds that much capacity covering 34 square meters for about $2600 (admittedly just the panel cost, not counting installation, inverters, etc., but it's hardly "princely", and will also fit on most rooftops). With that, you can meet your power needs for the ~14.5 hours of daytime in summer. For the other ~9.5 hours you might need to double that. Of course, it might turn out that you can save on the actual power needs with better insulation.

    4. Re:Hahahah. Shtawp! by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      The average house uses under 900kWh in an entire month. How many coin mining farms do you have for that AC to cool?

  21. You're not an individualist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may style yourself as one, but all that gear you listed, it was made by people who were part of social collectives. Your only an "individual" because you worked off the efforts of others.

  22. Re: Anyone with own roof & discipline can go o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps cities just need to die.

  23. Whitefish energy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those two guys must be laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaughing so fucking hard right about now...

    1. Re:Whitefish energy! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it worked out exactly like everybody expected. They got stiffed on payment, exactly like all the other companies that didn't want the job knew would happen.

      Lucky for them they got out as early as they did.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  24. Re: No by reanjr · · Score: 3, Informative

    You fucking kidding me? The first thing any of those red state governors do is declare state of emergency to unlock federal funds.

    Dipshit.

  25. And the answer is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. This kind of retarded speculation just brings tech people across as being . . . well, retarded. Imagine if all of that money and time went into solutions that are actually viable, because as it is, Silicon Valley largely look like clowns to the more knowledgable (i.e. virtually anyone outside of the valley echo chamber).

  26. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke Puerto Rico out of existence. There is nothing of value there.

  27. Re:Anyone with own roof & discipline can go of by Solandri · · Score: 2

    I can run my basics for 4-5 days off the battery and overcast alone(2KWh/day avg)

    The electricity consumption of the average Canadian household is 11,879 kWh/yr, or 32.5 kWh/day. You're able to live off the grid with your system because your electricity consumption is 1/16th that of the average Canadian home. Your electricity consumption is 21% the world's household average, and 40% the household average for the thriftiest OECD member nation (Mexico, which has a 46% poverty rate).

    Any typical household in the developed world would have to make serious and drastic compromises to their lifestyle to live off a system such as yours.

  28. Re:Anyone with own roof & discipline can go of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you looked into flooded 2v cells?
    Banks of those will last decades.

    High initial cost tho. (shipping is killer)

  29. Re: Anyone with own roof & discipline can go o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume it is because he is such a nice guy. It seems like he is always, literally giving people the shirt off his back. Too bad their are no other guys in Russia to love him.

    #ShirtlessPutinNeedsABear

  30. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't put out an RFP and let US companies submit proposals?

  31. So far the answer has been simply no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They claimed to be saving the battered country nearly 9 months ago by usage of their battery 'system' yet just the other day there was the massive outage. Proof is that it doesn't work. Or at least their so called promise is as believable as gas escaping from Elon Musk main speaking orifice.

  32. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use shitty Tesla batteries, use cheaper, longer lasting, proven NiFe batteries. Lithium batteries are just lighter, which is useless in this context.

  33. Re:Anyone with own roof & discipline can go of by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    That depends on your nation AC. Having and paying for a grid connection is what makes a dwelling legal in some nations.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  34. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's nice for you, but you're probably better off concentrating on getting used to wearing your big boy pants and getting through the day without having a little accident. One step at a time, eh?

  35. Re:Anyone with own roof & discipline can go of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could be right, or maybe not...
    I believe most of average home power consumption is poorly designed appliances and choice... It's so easy not to think, and just plug anything in, ignore idle power consumptions...

    Take fridges for one, they can be built to use 0.1KWH.day and be large enough for a family; and they wouldn't cost much more to make if they were mass-produced in quantity. Compared to most residential fridges use ~1KWh/day+.

    Take my journey in computers... Desktop/monitor ~100-200W(3.6KWh/day), then went to laptop ~60Watt(1.44Kwh), then power efficient ~14" laptop ~15W(0.36KWh). Then I discovered intels power efficient chips, and run a tablet ~2-6W(0.096Kwh) connected to a 40" power efficient monitor(~18W ~16hrs/day= 0.288KWh)
    So laptop(0.36KWh/day) vs tablet+40"(0.384KWh/day)

    The user experience with a 40" screen, wireless kb/mouse is soo much better.

    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/p...

    Most of my chinese security cameras take ~7W vs Panasonic's 1.1W... This all adds up. Available products and choice... The consumers are mostly to blame, because they choose not to think about power/cost ratios.

    Analog microwave 0KWh/day idle
    Digital microwave: ~0.2KWh/day (73Kwh/year ; $11-22/year+- depending on location; New analog microwave ~$40)

    My digital washing machine takes more power on idle than a load of laundry in a day(I unplug after every use, and I only need to do a load once a week)

    People don't even need to be off-grid to make this stuff pay for itself. Run the long term numbers of devices and you can often get new power efficient devices/toys for the power savings from the grid alone. Again they choose to be wasteful/not think about it.

  36. Why oh why.. by somepunk · · Score: 1

    would you use battery technology adapted for transportation (high specific energy/power) for a stationary application? Flow batteries have been around for decades for just this sort of application. They load follow well, too. Not as sexy as Elon Musk, though, I guess. (Yuck!) He probably can deliver faster though, and might subsidize it a bit for the PR.

    --
    Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov)
  37. Re: Anyone with own roof & discipline can go o by Guy+Smiley · · Score: 1

    At the same time, a 1.8kW solar install is on the small side. I have a 7.8kW solar system (30x 260W panels) and my house footprint is 1000 sqft, so not huge. That is enough to generate 30-40kWh/day in the summer. The biggest problem in Canada is that I get zero power from my panels for a couple of months in the winter because of snow cover. Being completely off-grid is not possible in my case.

  38. Re:Anyone with own roof & discipline can go of by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

    My wife and I live with a wasteful 7.2 kWh/day on average over an entire year in Oregon. I'm not sure he claimed 2 kWh/day as usage, the sentence seems to be formed to indicate that is how much he gets on overcast days and that he could last 4-5 days from the battery with that minimal overcast generation.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  39. Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's great that Tesla is doing this. They have already proven this in Australia. So yes it's a great story.
    If Tesla can make significant improvement on Puerto Ricos Electrical system, then it's a game changer on a much larger global scale.
    Go Tesla.