Slashdot Mirror


Net Neutrality Is Over Monday, But Experts Say ISPs Will Wait To Screw Us (inverse.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inverse: Parts of the Federal Communication Commission's repeal of net neutrality is slated to take effect on April 23, causing worry among internet users who fear the worst from their internet service providers. However, many experts believe there won't be immediate changes come Monday, but that ISPs will wait until users aren't paying attention to make their move. "Don't expect any changes right out of the gate," Dary Merckens, CTO of Gunner Technology, tells Inverse. Merckens specializes in JavaScript development for government and business, and sees why ISPs would want to lay low for a while before enacting real changes. "It would be a PR nightmare for ISPs if they introduced sweeping changes immediately after the repeal of net neutrality," he says.

While parts of the FCC's new plan will go into effect on Monday, the majority of the order still doesn't have a date for when it will be official. Specific rules that modify data collection requirements still have to be approved by the Office of Management and Budget, and the earliest that can happen is on April 27. Tech experts and consumer policy advocates don't expect changes to happen right away, as ISPs will likely avoid any large-scale changes in order to convince policymakers that the net neutrality repeal was no big deal after all.

14 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Net Neutering To-day, Democracy Gone To-morrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This is the TrumpVerse in action. November is the last chance to act! Run these bastards back to hell!!

    1. Re:Net Neutering To-day, Democracy Gone To-morrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      McConnell, the dixie-fuck, would not let anyone else through. It was tardo-Pai or fucking no one, and unlike the TrumpVerse, no one is worse than a tardo. In theory. Turns out, that was wrong. It is the TrumpVerse after all.

    2. Re:Net Neutering To-day, Democracy Gone To-morrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is the TrumpVerse in action. November is the last chance to act! Run these bastards back to hell!!

      Because government control is soooo much better!

      If you like your cable plan, you can keep your cable plan!

      We'll all be equal, force-fed the same government-approved shit sandwich on our way to late-stage Socialism, just like Venezuela.

    3. Re:Net Neutering To-day, Democracy Gone To-morrow? by JoystickJedi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is the TrumpVerse in action. November is the last chance to act! Run these bastards back to hell!!

      OK sparky, settle down. Way to demagogue a non-existent issue. I've been using the Internet since 1994 and have never had any of the issues cited to justify "Net Neutrality" aka government camel's nose under the tent attempt to regulate the Internet....

  2. Expert textpert choking smokers by swell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you think the joker laughs at you?

    "Net Neutrality Is Over Monday, But Experts Say ISPs Will Wait To Screw Us"

    We need experts to tell us this? Are we all blithering idiots who need to be told common-sense business tactics? Hey, we've discovered that there's an apartment shortage in my area. I wish I could find an expert to tell me whether rents will go up in the near future.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  3. Re:It's already started by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ISPs will treat websites like channels

    This, in 6 words, is why we need Net Neutrality, in case anyone is still asking why.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  4. Re:It's already started by GuB-42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What does it have to do with net neutrality. If anything, it is a case of product tying, not a net neutrality violation.

    Net neutrality is only about discriminating internet traffic, not including a service you may or may not want in their package.
    Furthermore, AFAIK, net neutrality says nothing about peering. Peering is the direct connection between your ISP and Netflix's (or whatever) ISP. This is very important for popular services because the global internet isn't fast enough to support them, making them almost unusable during peak hours. So if the "fast Netflix" just means better peering, again, no net neutrality violation.

  5. Re: Net Neutering To-day, Democracy Gone To-morrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No one said you had to vote for a Democrat. There are *some* decent Republicans out there, but most won't ever be nominated because conservitards only care about "muh bortions" and their right to oppress gay rights and freedom of *other* religions. Vote 3rd party every time if you find both parties to be unpalatable.

  6. Protection money by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Five years from now, none of the major fears like blocking sites they don't like will have materialized, but Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc. will be more one sided than ever.

    That's adorable you actually seem to believe that. If there is money to be made in blocking content then it will be blocked. The precise nature of the block is yet to be determined but it will happen in some form or fashion. Do you seriously think Comcast isn't going to prioritize their own content over everyone else's who doesn't pay them an arm and a leg? They've effectively gotten a government endorsed protection racket. "Nice website. Would be a shame if no one could see it..."

  7. Frog boiling 101 by burtosis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I'm sure the monopoly ISPs enjoy let's them give no fks, I'm confident they will do a slow boil on us frogs. Without rioting in the streets, it will be much easier on them if suddenly the senate and/or congress flips blue later this year.

  8. Also one candidate stood out, attention span by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think in this most recent presidential election on the Republican side there were about six "traditional" candidates - successful government and business leaders who basically did what candidates do, and then there was Donald Trump. The votes for "some reasonable choice of a person with a good track record" got spread amongst several primary candidates, leaving Trump to pick up all of the "somebody different" vote. Plus Trump is just good at getting attention.

    Also, we're living in a world where most voters have an attention span of 140 characters. People aren't reading in-depth analysis in the editorial pages, they are reading tweets.

  9. Re:Wait to screw us by untaken_name · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a common misconception - frogs don't stay in boiling water, even if it's heated slowly. The only time that a frog will not jump out of even a slowly-heated pot is when the sides are too steep. I guess frogs are smarter than humans, in a lot of ways.

  10. Re:Statist Control of Internet Access Now Loosened by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because it isn't as catchy as "Will wait to implement site level throttling."
    and Comcast Sucks ins't news is is just matter of fact.

    The thing is people get emotional because Net Neutrality is touted as killing off your netflix and your youtube. But the real damage is all the stuff that your ISP handle that isn't consumer level.
    I have 100mbs internet connection at home. I will VPN into work to do my work. If my ISP decides to throttle VPN Connections (because it is what bad people do too) And my work doesn't have the money or the willingness to pay the ISP ransom amount. I am stuck using a product Advertised as 100mbs but only getting 10mbs because they decide to throttle it.
    I could care less if Netflix takes an extra 5 seconds to load, or I don't get 4k resolution. But If I am transferring hundreds of megs of information back and forth of work data, then having to wait is wasting my time, and costing my company money. And I am getting ripped off, because I chose that ISP because of the bandwidth promised me.
     

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  11. Re:Statist Control of Internet Access Now Loosened by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So just to clarify, the FCC rules for the Internet going back to what they were a few years ago isn't going to be the end of the Internet and won't cause the economy to tank and won't make it so that no one can communicate ever again?

    Wow, who would have predicted that!

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.