Slashdot Mirror


Ford To Stop Selling Every Car In North America But the Mustang, Focus Active (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Ford today announced it will phase out most cars it sells in North America. According to its latest financial release, the auto giant "will transition to two vehicles" -- the Mustang and an unannounced vehicle, the Focus Active, being the only traditional cars it sells in the region. Ford sees 90 percent of its North America portfolio in trucks, utilities and commercial vehicles. Citing a reduction in consumer demand and product profitability, Ford is in turn not investing in the next generation of sedans. The Taurus is no more. The press release also talks about a new type of vehicle, though it sounds like a crossover. This so-called white space vehicle will "combine the best attributes of cars and utilities, such as higher ride height, space and versatility." Currently, Ford sells six sedans and coupes in North America: the Fiesta, Focus, Fusion, C-Max, Mustang and Taurus. This lineup hits multiple segments, from the compact Fiesta to the mid-size Focus, C-Max and Fusion to the full-size Taurus. The Mustang stands alone as the lone coupe.

43 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. A high ride is a good thing? by marcle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love my antiquated '94 Corolla wagon, not that it's a great car or anything (although it is), but largely because it's got a low and wide profile. Makes it fun to negotiate a curve. Who wants to drive around in a high box?

    1. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I love my antiquated '94 Corolla wagon, not that it's a great car or anything (although it is), but largely because it's got a low and wide profile. Makes it fun to negotiate a curve. Who wants to drive around in a high box?

      The floorpan on most of these crossovers is only an inch or two higher than the cars they're based on. The suspension is dramatically more advanced than your '94 Corolla Wagon, or even a car from '94 that actually handles like something other than a moldy dog turd. Basically any modern crossover will run rings around your wagon in the twisties.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your on crack now. An inch or two or three adds up fast. Also 'cars they're based on'? You mean the tall slow cars they're based on, in the few cases that's true. Most are based on light truck chassis.

      Do you realize the work that's done to get a chassis down 1 inch on a fast car?

      The modern car will not only have a higher CG, it will weigh much more. Congress passed rollover protection, perhaps they had never met the car industry and expected them to use better material, in any case modern cars are heavy pigs by 90s standards.

      The tires are better, but the old car will have modern tires.

      Suspension is dramatically more advanced? The only breakthrough in suspension to hit the roads since 94 is electronically adjustable damping (that works), which you will only find on high end sports/GT cars, not your average mall utility vehicle. Don't buy the bullshit. Macpherson struts are _not_ new. Even with the adjustable shocks, you don't go faster, you can just dial in a little comfort. Suck it up, you should be able to drive over a coin and call heads or tails, just by feel.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a reason Corollas became the best selling car of all time over the VW bug a little over twenty years ago. I have a 1992 sixth generation Corolla with nearly 500k miles.

      Indeed.

      The Nipponese made vehicles of such quality that the earth's preeminent automobile manufacturer was torn asunder, and Detroit has never been the same.

      Ironic, perhaps, that two of the nations vanquished in the 2nd World War (Germany and Japan) grew to dominate worldwide automotive manufacturing.

      Perhaps divesting one's national goals from military encroachment to industrial excellence promotes national productivity. Who knew?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by mikael · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mothers, pregnant, with children and elderly relatives. They don't have to crouch down to get into a car, limbo dance into the back seats through the narrow shaped gaps. Large flappy doors for two door cars (Peugeot) are another dislike. They are impossible to get out of in a supermarket car park. So sliding doors are preferred. Basically like having a personal Hackney cab. All the cars that people drive now seem to be either four wheel drive or something between an estate car and a van.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      A good bike is like 5 grand.

      That car is like, 500 dollars, max.

      The above is comically erroneous, and is emblematic of the syndrome in which a certain class of people believes they can buy their way into a sport by spending more money.

      You can buy a bicycle that is more than good enough for a short commute for $300, used, and there are plenty from which to choose,
      on Craigslist.

      No one other than a pro racer "needs" a bicycle which costs $5,000. And if you go to an amateur race with a $5,000 bicycle, there is a
      very good chance you will be beaten in that race by a rider who is using an old bicycle which cost a fraction of $5,000.

    6. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mothers, pregnant, with children and elderly relatives.

      That's NOT where elderly relatives come from.

    7. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Your on crack now.

      *You're

      An inch or two or three adds up fast.

      That's what she told you, huh?

      Also 'cars they're based on'? You mean the tall slow cars they're based on, in the few cases that's true. Most are based on light truck chassis.

      Uh no. This is in fact the defining factor between crossovers and SUVs. Crossovers are based on cars. SUVs are based on light trucks.

      The modern car will not only have a higher CG, it will weigh much more. Congress passed rollover protection, perhaps they had never met the car industry and expected them to use better material, in any case modern cars are heavy pigs by 90s standards.

      And yet, they still outhandle them in most cases, especially on broken pavement and the like, because instead of crap like macpherson or even double wishbone (which is at least decent, if bulky) they are using multilink front and rear. Only the most pathetic of econoboxes are still using macpherson. Macpherson has bump steer. I used to drive a 1989 240SX with Koni yellows and Eibach springs, with a 3" drop. Later, I drove a 1993 Impreza LS with WRX wheels and no other mods. Now I drive a 1998 A8 Quattro. The difference in handling is night and day. I give up some road feel compared to either of those vehicles, but what I get back in handling over broken pavement is more than worth it. I just had a nice drive back to Kelseyville from Albion and I literally laughed out loud at several points when the suspension just handled things I expected to have to correct for.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re: A high ride is a good thing? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Nothing new on the suspension front since the introduction of the Citroen DS.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who the hell cares which car goes around corners faster when exceeding the speed limit. The compact/mid SUV much easier access and egress, better vision, far more effective loading area, in fact the most logical body shape for a car. The low end cars are very competitive and the compact/mid SUV leaves more price to play with and upmarket in fitments and more scope for batteries, flat bed front to back. Who knows, eventually a two door rag top mustang mid SUV.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ironic, perhaps, that two of the nations vanquished in the 2nd World War (Germany and Japan) grew to dominate worldwide automotive manufacturing.

      Perhaps divesting one's national goals from military encroachment to industrial excellence promotes national productivity. Who knew?

      More like, "perhaps having your legacy industry blown to kingdom-come and having to rebuild it from scratch gives you a leg up...."

      Especially since in this case, the people who rebuilt their industry from scratch did it with money from the guys who didn't have to rebuild theirs....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    11. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "good bike" is subjective, and there are GREAT bikes available for far less than $5,000 new. You don't need a fucking carbon fiber frame with Shimano Dura-ace components front-to-back on your commuter bike - you aren't entering the Tour de France here. Also, there's this web site called "Craigslist" that you may have heard of, which connects you with people that are selling used stuff in your area. If a 25 year old Corolla is acceptable, why wouldn't a lightly-used 3-year old bike be?

      And then there's this:

      Operating cost of a bicycle is essentially free, plus some tires, brake elements, and chain oil. And you can subtract the gym membership you don't need for getting your cardio in.

      Operating cost of your Corolla that you keep going on about is much higher. The next set of tires + brake job alone would more than pay for a decent commuter bike, never mind the fuel, battery, oil changes, brake fluid / power steering / coolant flush / transmission oil if you're actually maintaining the thing.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    12. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      Horse shit. Basically every bike except the boutique dealers is made by Giant these days, so just buy a Giant and don't pay for the brand and higher-end components that you won't even notice the difference on. By and large, they are all the same frame with a different paint job and different components bolted on.

      You can get a brand new Giant "city" bike with disc brakes for $600 MSRP. Find a dealer who's clearancing a prior year model (which, again, nobody except an avid cyclist is likely to notice the difference between the components as long as they aren't 10 year old completely unmaintained garbage) and you can have it for less than that.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    13. Re:A high ride is a good thing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The compact/mid SUV much easier access and egress, better vision, far more effective loading area, in fact the most logical body shape for a car.

      You spend a few minutes or even seconds getting in and out, or loading and unloading. You spend hours driving. Sedans have better aerodynamics than crossovers. The most logical body shape for a car is a sedan or wagon, given that we live in the real world with wind resistance.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Oil and gas profits not as high as projected... by Tyr07 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ford stops selling vehicles that consume less gas in line with new mobility taxes so only the rich can travel. Affordable vehicles wreaked havoc when the peasant population was able to leave areas with shitty abusive systems in place.

    1. Re:Oil and gas profits not as high as projected... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny that they're discontinuing all the fuel efficient models just as the many-years-long slump in oil prices is ending. I guess they can only think about what they should have done in the past, not plan for the future.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Oil and gas profits not as high as projected... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ford sells a ridiculous number of trucks, that is why they are phasing out less popular models. They somehow suckered people into thinking $60k for a truck is a normal price. One model is over $100k when maxed out with options!

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  3. Re:Higher height is just terrible by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    Long and low hoods might look nice, but they're dangerous.

    That would not be because they are low, but because they are long.

  4. Following the Japanese by digitect · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think Honda might have been the first to do this about three decades ago when they based all their cars on just two flexible platforms. The Accord, TL, RL, TSX, Crosstour... all the same car. The smaller was the Civic and the RSX. The SUVs are similar, Pilot/MDX and CRV/RDX. They keep changing the model names to throw us off the trail, but the manufacturing is very carefully designed to minimize infrastructure, support, and design. I never figured out where the odd US models like Fit and Element fit that scheme, but they sure seemed expensive for so few units if they were unique.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
  5. Let me guess .... only 1 color? by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or any color as long as it's black?

  6. Crown Vic by technosaurus · · Score: 3, Funny

    They had a sedan that sold well and businesses bought in mass, but cancelled it. Bring back the Crown Vic, I can't tell todays cop cars and taxis from an uber.

    1. Re:Crown Vic by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      You can thank the Government for that. That 4.6L V8 sucked gas. Now everyone is buying Explorers(or similar) with the same 4.6l V8 but even more weight, but since it is a "Truck" it doesn't fall under mileage guidelines. Unintended consequences are never addressed. We Must Have Our 45 MPG cars! Who cares if nobody wants them.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. Goodbye Ford. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're betting the company on SUVs, and in a few years when gas prices shoot up again, you're gonna lose the company. Does anyone really believe gas prices can stay this low for forever? I think they'll shoot up again within 5 years, just when Ford has ditched all its cars that people will actually want to buy when gas is $5 a gallon.

    1. Re:Goodbye Ford. by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      You're betting the company on SUVs, and in a few years when gas prices shoot up again, you're gonna lose the company

      They will all be electrics or hybrids by then. The trucks they will sell in 5-10 years will get much better mileage than the cars they sell today.

      Does anyone really believe gas prices can stay this low for forever?

      Nope, and neither does Ford.

      Ditching their traditional cars is a bold move, that's true enough. But I can't think of a single rational argument against it.

  8. How will they achieve CAFE? by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:How will they achieve CAFE? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They classify all the other vehicles (pickups, SUVs) as trucks.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  9. MIsleading headline and summary by tomhath · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ford currently sells five models of sedans: Taurus, Focus RS, Fiesta, Mustang, and Focus Active. They're phasing out the first three models over the next few years, to be replaced with all new electric and hybrid models. Still spending a bit to keep the other two in production for the foreseeable future though.

    1. Re:MIsleading headline and summary by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Ford currently sells five models of sedans: Taurus, Focus RS, Fiesta, Mustang, and Focus Active. They're phasing out the first three models over the next few years, to be replaced with all new electric and hybrid models. Still spending a bit to keep the other two in production for the foreseeable future though.

      Erm... I think you need to look up the meaning of sedan, it's 4 doors and a boot.

      The Focus RS and Fiesta are hatchbacks, the Mustang is a coupe and the Focus Active is a jacked up hatchback (called a SUV).

      The Focus can be had as a Sedan, but not in the RS spec.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  10. Re:Or... Ford cedes sedan market to Tesla by haruchai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If US consumer tastes change (as they always do) Ford is toast.

    Tesla can't make enough sedans and not affordably enough

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  11. They are going to buy Tesla. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    Their masterplan is to use all the money saved by shuttering all these lines into shorting Tesla, drive down its share price and buy the company.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  12. Model T by technosaurus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They forget how the company was built. A Model T was $300 in 1925 => $4,268.42 in 2018. You can't buy a new car for triple that now.

    1. Re:Model T by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If people were willing to buy a 20hp car with no heater, no AC, no electronics, no radial tires, no electric starter, no air bags, no power seats, a life span of 50,000 miles or so, and that needed servicing every month, I'm sure there would be a $4286 car available today.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Model T by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      A couple off decades ago we briefly had the Yugo show up in the US. Went about as well as expected. Although that was TWICE the HP!!!!!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  13. Where will Amazon deliver my pacakages?! by edtice1559 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They only deliver to GM. Maybe Ford sees the writing on the wall.

  14. Re: Electric cars are still toys by postbigbang · · Score: 2

    I think you're missing the point.

    Tesla psychologically owns the luxury market. It's the cool kid's ride, easily analogized to the iPhone 8 or 10. Is it a pavement pounder? Yes. Is it the fastest? No. It's the coolest, or so says the buyers, who pay a huge margin to a company that barely floats its boat.

    I like Corvettes, but Bowling Green lost its way, IMHO. Still very cool. But not for the cool kids. Corvettes are like Blackberrys, or maybe an LG.

    Afterthought: Isn't it appropriate to use smartphone metaphors in a car thread, instead of cars in a smartphone thread?

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  15. On the other hand, if increase 20%/year for 50 yea by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Let's look at those numbers a bit differently. Tesla investors hope that Tesla grows, of course. If Tesla does extremely well and increases sales by 20% every single year, in 50 they'll be - still not one of the top 5 automakers.

  16. FORD by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Funny

    FORD:

    Found On Road, Discontinued

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  17. I do. by sombragris · · Score: 2

    I do. Streets in my city (Asunción) are awful. Lots of potholes and plenty of ill-designed and ill-placed speed bumps. When you have low quality streets, a high ride is a godsend.

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
  18. Re:Or... Ford cedes sedan market to Tesla by tattood · · Score: 2

    Teslas have a ~300 mile range. Unless you are driving more than 150 miles each way to work, you can just charge it at home.

    --
    WTB [sig], PST!!!
  19. Re: Electric cars are still toys by djinn6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tesla makes plenty of money on the S and X. It's just that they are investing that money on bringing up the Model 3 and other projects.

    That's not the case at all. Money for the Model 3 is coming from investors and loans.

    According to their Q4 report, their gross profit is $438 million a quarter. Of that, $146 million goes towards paying interest on their loans. Another $1 billion goes to other expenses, including R&D, marketing and administrative. Notice how they're already $600 million the red before we even get to the $786 million in capital expenditures (aka. factory construction).

    So they paying for all this with loans, which is not really sustainable.

    To get in the black, they'll need a combination of several things:
    - Drastically increase gross profit.
    - Cut R&D, marketing and administrative spending.
    - Reduce interest costs.
    - Stop building new factories.

    I personally don't think any of those are viable. Their margin is relatively high at 19% right now because they're selling luxury models. But the Model 3 will have a much lower margin, perhaps only 10% (which is what Ford is working with). Even if they can sell their target 5,000 Model 3's a week, we're still looking at only $200 million in additional gross profit for the quarter. The other $400 million loss will have to be made up with cost cuts.

    Maybe they can kill R&D ($350 million) at the cost of future competitiveness, but marketing and administrative expenses can't be cut without affecting sales or production.

    Not much can be done about interest costs, since it's the banks that set the rates. They also need the money right now, so paying the loans off is not an option.

    As for capital expenditures, well, they're definitely not going to make enough sales to save them if they don't have factories for the production volume.

    All in all a pretty bleak picture. But they have the backings of millions of fanboys and more importantly, investors, so they'll be ok until something bad happens to Musk. Even if they did get out of this hole though, I still don't see them turning into the next Apple or Amazon.

  20. Re:Or... Ford cedes sedan market to Tesla by Dog-Cow · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think exception would be taken if I ran an extension cord from my second-story window into the parking lot and across to where I could actually park. I also suspect that my car would not remain plugged-in for as long as I might need.

  21. Re:Or... Ford cedes sedan market to Tesla by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    Well damn, I guess we should scrap the whole idea of EVs then because you can't charge one.

    You know there's literally hundreds of millions of people that have driveways and garages that can, right? If it's not a good solution for you, don't buy one. Gasoline will still be a thing for some time.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  22. Re:Higher height is just terrible by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    Japanese, cars have always fit me better and more comfortably than American cars.

    This is largely a myth. Two cars coming off the same production line, one goes left, gets Toyota badging, the other goes right and gets GM. Which one has the higher customer rating? Yup, Toyota. Better life cycle too. Same parts, same labor, same everything, what is the difference?

    Turns out, how people VIEW their cars matters. They take care of cars that they think will last, and don't take care of cars that are "cheap". Self fulfilling.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.