Slashdot Mirror


Design Commentary on Google's New To-Do Tasks App (pxlnv.com)

On the sidelines of Gmail's big refresh push, Google also released a new app called Google Tasks. It's a simple app that aims to help users manage their work and home tasks. But it's being talked about for one more reason. From a blog post: Unlike most of their other apps, though, Tasks uses an inconsistent mix of Roboto, their old brand typeface, and Product Sans, their new one. The two faces don't look good together -- it's like when Apple shipped apps that used both Helvetica and Lucida Grande. According to their announcement of Product Sans and their new logo, the typeface was supposed to be used in promotional materials and lockups, but there's no mention of it being used for product UIs. In fact, the only other product I can find that has this same inconsistent mix is the new Gmail.com, also previewed today.

It isn't just about what these typefaces look like, either, but how they're used. For example, when entering a new task, the name of the task is set in Product Sans; when it is added to the list, it becomes Roboto. Tapping on the task takes you to a details view where, now, the name of the task is in Product Sans. There are three options to add more information: if you want to add details, you'll do it in Roboto, but adding a due date will be in Product Sans. The "add subtasks" button -- well, text in the same grey as everything else except other buttons that are blue -- is set in Product Sans, but the tasks are set in Roboto.

85 comments

  1. Oh, Lord! No! by moehoward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the end of the world!

    Whiny much?

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the korean war is about to end and slashdot is talking about an app

    2. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by pz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's the end of the world!

      No, obviously it isn't. But not paying attention to UI suggests that there might well be an equivalent lack of attention given to inner workings including, the flavor of the month, security and privacy.

      It's just like the infamous no-brown-m&m-s clause in Van Halen's contracts. That clause was long held to be the pinnacle of rock-and-roll excess, but in actuality, it wasn't about the preferences of the band members for snack foods. Rather it was an indicator the band used to judge how carefully the venue operator had read the contract and thus had prepared the important items like structural integrity of the stage, appropriate power feeds, evacuation routes, etc.

      If someone can't get the obvious, glaring things right, they can't be trusted to get the hidden details right, either.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What a terrific idea! I'm going to ask my wife to swing by the grocery store on the way home and pick up some Vidalia onions. If she gets normal yellow or white onions, or jesus christ red onions, I'm filing for divorce. Because obviously she won't be a good sexual partner or mother to our children if she can't follow a simple instruction to pick up Vidalia onions.

    4. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't know about that interesting Van Halen factoid; I did not read about it at the time because I was a fan and didn't want to read anything negative (Their lifestyle made *me* want to be a rock star, in any case). And later even Bono changed his persona to epitomize the 'rock megastar in excess,' complete with that BW shot of him sporting the megastar shades sipping wine coolers in a hotel jacuzzi. Would it also explain Zeppelin's penchant for trashing hotel rooms? If our accountants cannot square the bill with hotel management, then we leave.

    5. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be fallacious (affirming the consequence) to suggest that, because your wife could not follow one simple instruction, that she must be a failed person who cannot function as a mother or wife. Nevertheless, it would be imprudent, upon noting a series of small failures of judgement, not to double-check some important things to see if there is some systemic failure lurking beneath the surface. Fonts on a web-based application are invoked through stylesheets, and it is likely that different stylesheets belong to different components or frameworks developed by different teams. If the teams do not synchronize their efforts in style, that does not necessarily mean that they also have not coordinated in the realms of security and privacy, but it would be prudent to check to see whether some difference between the teams' strategies and perspectives might have caused other problems. Also, the idea that many toolkits are going into a final project suggests that there is cruft that could be simplified to save on bandwidth and maintenance.

    6. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no, dumbfuck.

      But if you asked for vidalia onions and she got white onions instead, then you might want to check the date on the milk.

    7. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technology site talking about technology rather than political events? Shocking.

    8. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, I've called the Font police.

    9. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      Or, you could go and fucking do the groceries yourself or, gasp, along with her!

    10. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If someone can't get the obvious, glaring things right, they can't be trusted to get the hidden details right, either.

      Yeah, because a single clause hidden deep in a contract, that is considered to be the "pinnacle of rock-and-roll excess", is more important than worrying about issues that can actually kill people at worst, and cause significant legal liability issues for the venue. A flunky that is tasked with the stupid task of sorting M&Ms missing one absolutely proves that the electricians and other contractors hired by the venue are incompetent. Van Halen is trying to spin their ego into something important, which is what an ego tends to do.

    11. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The clause is a canary. Respect the canary. Every coal miner knows that.

    12. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Sigh, no. The brown M&M clause was to make sure that the contract was read AT ALL.

      If they didn't read it closely enough to figure out the M&M thing, they probably skimmed the important bits.

    13. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Bullshit logic.

      They typically print multiple copies of the requirements, gives one to the sparky, one to the stage builder jock, one to the sound engineer nerd and finally one to the blonde who stocks up the toilet tissues in the green room. Usually these blondes take their jobs seriously and meticulously give you bowls and bowls of brown free m&m s. The jocks running the wiring are the one all over confident and would skim the contract.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    14. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If they didn't read it closely enough to figure out the M&M thing, they probably skimmed the important bits.

      Yeah, because in years of providing stage and electrical services, the contractors never learned that it was important that the stage not fall down without needing that detail spelled out in a performance contract with a band. Right. Sure.

      My God, what carnage there was before Van Halen started demanding brown-free bowls of M&Ms and that their stage not fall down while they were on it.

      More likely they skimmed over the bullshit parts of the contract where the performers demanded ridiculous things, or if they didn't skim that part someone said "this is bullshit" and just didn't do it, or the below-minimum-wage intern they gave the M&M job to wasn't up to the critical task.

      On the other hand, stage building and electrical work is a union job, and those people tend not to need bullshit contracts from egotistical performers to know how to do their jobs, and they know that if they fail there are going to be lawsuits.

    15. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that drop wife usefulness variable to dangerously low levels?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    16. Re: Oh, Lord! No! by jddj · · Score: 1

      As someone who works specifying UI and interaction design, I'm thinking that whatever is missed in the front-end probably isn't directly reflective of, say, mitigation of security threats, backend performance, query efficiency, etc.

      These things come from different team members or teams, on a modern project of scale in a big company.

      It _could_ reflect a poorly-run project, or, more-likely at Google: an engineer-run project (not knocking engineers, but fonts aren't the first concern of most).

      Another possibility (treading cautiously, as I haven't tried the app) is that the interaction designer is trying to indicate something visually, by the way the fonts are used ("this data is changeable", "this item is subordinate to it's parent in this view").

      Since the critique I've seen is only of visual design aspects, it's hard to tell.

      Would give it a spin, but I'm pretty stuck with Remember The Milk for tasks.

    17. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And from a person who thinks it's a good idea to have a web page with grey text. My eyes hurt looking at that blog from the low-contrast, and that's before actually reading it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They ran out of Verdana onions. I bought some Garlic Sans instead.

    19. Re:Oh, Lord! No! by Julz · · Score: 1

      It's becoming the norm for Google's apps/software, and plenty of others, to have glaring issues that have made it into the public arena. Testing seems to have been dropped in favour of first to the post and/or just done not done right.

      --
      When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  2. Font fetish by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

    Is there a gene that makes some people get angry about mismatched fonts, and not other people? It just seems really weird to me.

    I logically understand all the stuff about fonts - why Comic Sans shouldn't be used in business presentations, and why not to mix two typefaces within a document. It makes perfect sense. But if someone actually violates these things, someone has to point it out to me or I don't notice it. But to actually write an article about it seems like... wow, really? It matters THAT much?

    1. Re:Font fetish by arth1 · · Score: 2

      First world problems.

      But to be honest, I wish they would just focus on the basics. Palm (pre-phone era) got this, and made the core apps as simple as possible, always accessible through a single button, and never do or present in unexpected ways. They were useful, not eye candy.
      But apparently, the new generation care more about form than function. Or don't actually do things that make the core apps useful.

    2. Re:Font fetish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, is this the type of discussion we have about technology these days? Who gives a flying f*ck about the fonts.

      What about the fact that the new tasks are harder to use? Before I could just tab in the task name and it would become a subtask. I could do that all the levels that I wanted. Now to create subtasks I actually have to go edit the task, and can only create 1 level down. Why remove/change something to easy and powerful?

    3. Re:Font fetish by Imazalil · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      It's a pretty short blog post. There's no flamewar raging accross reddit, as far as I know, there's been actual 'storms and 'gates about lesser things. If you're in a given profession, or just a fan of X, you're gonna complain when people get something wrong. /. wouldn't exist otherwise.

      If you're an developer, you're gonna nitpick someone else's sloppy code. Really, what's a few kb of leaking memory per hour?
      If you're a cook, you're gonna nitpick someone else's sloppy cooking. Meh, what's an extra half-cup of salt and sugar?
      If you're a designer, you're gonna nitpick someone else's layout. But I got a hundred fonts installed, why not use them?

    4. Re:Font fetish by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      This is news because Google should have internal design specifications and they can't even follow it.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:Font fetish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactamundo. MobyDickless doesn't understand, he's a cuntfused little bonernose.

    6. Re:Font fetish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might be missing the point of this "review", MobyDisk.

      When MisMash focuses so intently on the use of fonts in a Google app, it's a clear indication that Google is paying buckets of money to someone and a note taped to one of those buckets said something like "Review that to-do app. Don't make it sound like you are in our back pocket or anything but go easy on us."

      Take that review with a giant grain of sea-salt exquisitely hand-made from sea water taken from San Francisco bay and evaporated among the red woods of the Russian River.

      Also, if you run a ROT13 on every twentieth word and then a book code using the 2002 edition or The Big Book of Fonts (and where to get them), you can clearly see MisMash is writing "HELP ME".

    7. Re:Font fetish by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Why remove/change something to easy and powerful?

      If it interferes with something even more basic, it's fine to remove or change it so it doesn't. If I paste a text, I'd like for it not to create subtasks if the text happens to contain tabs. That's even more core.

    8. Re:Font fetish by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Is there a gene that makes some people get angry about mismatched fonts, and not other people? It just seems really weird to me.

      I think you've effectively quashed the rumors that were going around saying you were, in fact, Marissa Mayer.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Font fetish by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      Details matter, even if only subconsciously. This sort of thing contributes to the overall feel of products. Yes it's minor, but make enough minor mistakes and your work will start to feel pretty cheap and crummy.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    10. Re:Font fetish by skids · · Score: 2

      I've tried a few of these TODO apps and have never ceased to be surprised at how little progress has been made since the paper desk calender. Zero of them have actually been worth using.

      Just giving you notifications and showing you your tasks in order is a friggin CS101 homework level of core functionality.

      Really what I need is one built for procrastinators where I can just say nope, not doing that today, and it'll remind me about it N days later... or in fact, tell me to do a task early because Friday all the other crap I put off is coming due, or say hey you know you wanted to remember to buy stamps and you are currently standing outside a post office. Or take the periodic semiannual "clean the bathroom drain" task and tell me to it it on a day when I have a light schedule, instead of exactly 365.25/2 days from the last time it fired when I'm doing my taxes and five other things. Or prioritize shit before bugging me about it. Or know (be able to be told) which tasks can be moved and which are stuff like dental appointments.

      Yeah great. Cloud storage and sync to other machines. Whoohoo. Those are about as important as the stupid fonts, IMO. Focus on the core functionality for a change before every app devolves into a chatcalnewsmusicmailshoppingcontactsapp.

    11. Re:Font fetish by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It matters THAT much?

      It doesn't matter if your secretary isues* a document with comic sans. However what about if your secretary was also the person who was responsible for writing the style guidelines for the entire company.

      THAT is the issue here. Google have paid a small fortune employing designers to come up with a cohesive and consistent style and UI and have pushed this out for not only their products universally but also published it as a guide for other developers. Keeping to the design and style guidelines they set for apps provides developers with some free advertising as Google also promotes apps which make good use of their style guide. When a company like that messes up with fonts then it matters.

      *I misspelled "issues". Nothing important is going to happen. Some Slashdotter may get upset. Can the same be said if the Oxford dictionary made the same misspelling?

    12. Re:Font fetish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but Google's UI designers are morons.
      I thought we re-established that yesterday with the railing against the flat UI rollout in gmail.
      It was originally established when they rolled out the flat UI on youtube.

      Google have paid a small fortune employing designers to come up with a cohesive and consistent style and UI

    13. Re:Font fetish by war4peace · · Score: 1

      All that functionality can be easily implemented. Why isn't it? because in order for it to work, its user needs to be very good at:
      - categorizing tasks
      - entering all tasks attributes properly
      - understanding many-to-many relations
      - entering their own time and schedule properly into the app

      By the time they're good enough at all that, they barely need a tasks app anymore.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    14. Re:Font fetish by skids · · Score: 1

      Assuming stupidity of the user base is why our software is so dumb it makes us dumber the more we use it. Build something smart for a change.

    15. Re:Font fetish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a gene that makes some people get angry about mismatched fonts, and not other people? It just seems really weird to me. [...]

      Yeah, it's called the "SJW" gene.

    16. Re:Font fetish by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Why build something that almost nobody would use?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re:Font fetish by skids · · Score: 1

      Why don't you go back in time and ask Linus in 1991? "Almost nobody" was using that.

    18. Re:Font fetish by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Incorrect analogy, Task managers with similar functionalities were tried and abandoned in the past due to lack of customer base.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    19. Re:Font fetish by skids · · Score: 1

      I would greatly appreciate any pointers to those.

    20. Re:Font fetish by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Pick your poison :)
      https://www.droptask.com/featu...
      http://www.trello.com/
      http://www.thoughtbox.es/
      http://www.weekplan.net/
      http://www.teamweek.com/

      There was a gamey app called Toround or something, Nine for photo-based tasks, etc.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    21. Re:Font fetish by skids · · Score: 1

      Thank you much, I'll check those out!

  3. Google's swift response by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

    They have decided on the freely available Comic Sans, and that was final, a spokesman said.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  4. Unusable!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unusable!!!

  5. there's an app for that by Toxiz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your browsing history plus email didn't tell us exactly what you were doing at all times, so we made an app for you to report it to us. -love google

    1. Re:there's an app for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your browsing history plus email didn't tell us exactly what you were doing at all times, so we made an app for you to report it to us. -love google

      Bingo...spot on, mate. Google knows more about us than FB.

    2. Re:there's an app for that by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      They also give me a lot more in return than facebook. Free Email, calendar integration, contact backup, maps w/ traffic. There are apps I use.

    3. Re:there's an app for that by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Your browsing history plus email didn't tell us exactly what you were doing at all times, so we made an app for you to report it to us. -love google

      There is that (humor is best when it contains a grain of plausibility).

      However I think there's another important consideration here. At this point in time, Google has a well-established track record of killing projects once they've lost interest - I'm sure there are actual internal reasons stated, but from the outside it can seem like these decisions are made by some ADHD-afflicted teenager. So, at this point, why would anyone migrate to a new Google project like this one - let's face it, the people who are open to using a "Tasks app" are probably already doing so - when there's a decent chance you're going to have to migrate back away from it in the not-so-distant future?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re: there's an app for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free? Like calling a slaughter house a free spa for cows. Those apps aren't free, you just haven't paid the dues yet.

    5. Re:there's an app for that by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Generally, I'd agree. But my to-do lists have consisted of draft emails sitting in Gmail for the past 5 years anyway, spread across 3 different topics. Might as well put it in one single list with some additional functionality (reminders for hard deadlines, maybe?). Yeah, it might go away, but I can cut and paste it back into an unsent email pretty quick if it happens.

  6. Nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will ever need more than 640K

        -- Bill Gates

  7. Fonts? by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    Yawn. Don't care.

    Does the new version rip out a bunch of features like most Google "upgrades?" That's all I care about.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  8. John 8:7 by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think the typeface in the Wired article's headline sucks ass?

    Oh, and it's flak, not flack. The former is from the German for anti-aircraft gun, the latter means a shill.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. Wrong. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    You do care about fonts.
    You do notice shitty layout and crappy fonts and lettering.
    Maybe only subconsciously, but you do care.

    There's a reason why well designed products get more attention and get used more often.
    Yes, also by you.

    Try this: Sit in front of an iMac with retina display and work for a few weeks.
    Then go back to some regular screen resolution.
    Even you will notice the difference. Promise.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Wrong. by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      Dude or dudette, I work on a console all day long.. lol.

      I care about functionality/feature set, performance, and reliability. So long as the fonts are legible and all of the forms are properly aligned, I don't care which fonts they choose. It just doesn't matter.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    2. Re:Wrong. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      There's a reason why well designed products get more attention and get used more often.
      ...
      Try this: Sit in front of an iMac with retina display and work for a few weeks.

      Tried it, but got bored after a few minutes. Black screen. I don't think I could take a few weeks of this.

      Because I couldn't find the fucking power button.

      Of all the company's products to bring up in a good-vs-bad design context, you chose one of the very worst, the most incompetent people that ever worked in the industry. The people who decided that power buttons should be invisible not only to the eye, but also not be tactile too.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    3. Re:Wrong. by friedmud · · Score: 2

      I work on a console all day long too - and I think the font there matters _even more_ than in GUIs. Retina screens make a big difference on eye strain when staring at the console all day - and a nice monospaecd font (I like Monaco) can make a big different over the long haul.

      That said: I don't care _that_ much about fonts in apps / on websites. But for the console I spend _all_ day looking at it... so I want it to be pleasing to look at.

    4. Re:Wrong. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      You do care about fonts.

      Well, yes and no. If a product mixes 2 fonts, I can't care less. But if an unreadable font is forced on me, yes, I do care. Like when Windows Explorer on WinXP and later some service pack on XP forced the use of aliased (a.k.a. blurry) fonts instead of the nicely optimized fonts previously used in all versions, my eyes bled and I cared so much that I gave up Windows for Linux completely.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    5. Re:Wrong. by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      *shrug* lol.. I just mean I'm unwilling to give up a single useful feature during an "upgrade" that's done to "refresh the user experience" or whatever they call it.

      And it happens _all the time_.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    6. Re:Wrong. by chrish · · Score: 1

      Note sure if you're joking or not, but when we got one of the new MacBook Pros in with the idiotic Touch(TM) Bar(R) I literally could not find the power button for several minutes. I had no idea you could push the fingerprint sensor, and it's definitely not marked as a power button.

      --
      - chrish
  10. Google is the Honey Badger by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3

    >> (sniveling voice): Tasks uses an inconsistent mix of Roboto, their old brand typeface, and Product Sans, their new one

    Google doesn't give a shit: they are the fucking honey badger. You will take their 1998-era interface, type in all your personal shit, and receive the ads that are keyword-assigned to your fucking "tasks", your stupid "mail", your pointless "calender events" and all your web searches for brony warez. Why? Because you are cheap and you value moderately good searches. Just don't think you are the only one searching your digital life - that index ain't just for you.

    1. Re:Google is the Honey Badger by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't give a shit

      They have spent a fuckton of money on UI design overhaul as well as writing design guidelines and converting apps to use a consistent style guide. Google does give a shit, that's why this UI balls up is so fascinating.

  11. Ew. No, seriously: Ew! by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    They mixed Roboto and Product Sans? Someone needs to get smacked and learn some design basics before being let go on UX... That's like doing speed critical coding in Ruby and front-end in C. In the same app.
    If you mix fonts (which you really shouldn't!), then there should
      be a very significant difference between them, like sans and serif. Or fine and Ultrabold.
    That would be some trash-grundgy post modern thing which will probably be out of style again next year, but you could do it if you know what you are doing.

    Unless you really know what you're doing, don't mix fonts. Do the variations in weight, nothing else.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Ew. No, seriously: Ew! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the only time you can mix fonts is title vs main text, and even then you better pick similar fonts.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  12. Shouldn't be Google's choice anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember when, as a user, you just went into Font Preferences and told the system which font you prefer, and your apps complied because the computer's purpose is to do whatever the user wants?

    Software designers shouldn't even know what font their app uses. That's determined at runtime.

    1. Re:Shouldn't be Google's choice anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      My product, my UI, my decision.

      You dont like it you are free to use someone elses software.

      I wrote the thing, I decide how it looks.

  13. tasks =/= reminders by Archon · · Score: 1

    Google's tasks and reminders are seemingly two separate DBs.

    Google Assistant, Keep, Inbox, and Calendar use the reminders DB. The new Gmail and Tasks use the other. Why in the holy hell these two are separate is maddening but as long they remain so it severely gimps both. Whatever Assistant defaults to should be what everything does.

  14. Oh Lordy.... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

    Typeface nerds (anyone who gives a shit about typefaces really) are the *worst* kinds of people.

    THE WORST

    1. Re:Oh Lordy.... by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2

      Audiophiles and Cyclists shake their head in disagreement.

    2. Re:Oh Lordy.... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      Audiophiles and Cyclists shake their head in disagreement.

      YOU LEAVE CYCLISTS OUT OF THIS!!!

  15. It's all about prioritization by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    Seems like the priorities are usually roughly as follows:

    • - Identify the competition (done: Microsoft Outlook.)
    • - Copy every single feature available in the competition (done... erm... mostly)
    • - Make changes to some other random crap, so people don't immediately recognize that this was all just an exercise in feature parity (done)
    • - Make the product mesh with all the rest of our products, and actually look good. (incomplete)

    Though, as a developer myself, I kind'a feel like that last bullet is almost never completed... someone in the management team always wants us to change some more random crap, so we never really have enough time to make things look good, let alone consistent.

  16. Promotional Material and Mockups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if it's supposed to be used for mockups, then perhaps the product UIs were not fully feature-complete, so parts of it was still using the mockup UI instead of "production" UI, perhaps?

  17. more than likely .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole issue is probably related to the entire application being not much more than a series of libraries being imported and a dozen lines of
    new code to make use of the libraries. Obviously, 1 or more of the libraries has not been updated to the new font standard.

  18. This is where the bar is: Todo Apps. Really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is where the bar is: Todo Apps. Really.

    Gotta love these ads.

  19. UX interior designer wanna-bes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if you asked for vidalia onions and she got white onions

    After very careful consideration:

    Shut the fuck up and eat your onions. They're fucking Onions. Throw a little garlic in there, sauté them in butter, and call it good. Really good. Mmmm, sautéed onions.

    And read your buttons. Can you read your buttons? Text all on the button, not falling off the sides? Button does what it's supposed to? Yes? Good. Then they're okay buttons. Done. Move along.

    There is nothing so lame as this kind of complaining about a font. We're not talking readability here; just font style. UX "designer" pissing, whining and moaning. The moment someone says "UX" in connection with this kind of utterly pointless wittering about a bloody font style, I want to shove them off the end of a settling pond catwalk in a sewage processing plant.

    1. Re:UX interior designer wanna-bes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Shut the fuck up and eat your onions. They're fucking Onions.

      "Shut the fuck up and take this chemotherapy. Who cares if you only have the sniffles and it isn't Dayquil, it's fucking medicine!"

    2. Re: UX interior designer wanna-bes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UX does not manage font styles UI does that....so ignorant

  20. I'm imagining many "Rain Man"-like panic attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm imagining many "Rain Man"-like panic attacks about the fonts.

    Comedy gold.

  21. My top 3 daily UI fails by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    I've got a Fire tablet, to access numbers from the keyboard you have to hit the 123 key, to go back to letters hit abc. Pain in the fucking ass, just put a number row above qwerty. I don't use !@$, etc much on my Fire, but I use numbers every damned time I enter a password. Which is what the Fire keyboard is used for 90% of the time.

    My Android calendar defaults to day mode with no way to tell it I prefer the week or month view. No, I have to enter settings and hit month every damned time I open the calendar. I want month views 90% of the time, week views 9%, and daily 1% of the time.

    Windows 10 has decided it looks better when the scroll bars are a light blue against a dark beige background. I'm sure the eyeballs of the 20 somethings designing this stuff thinks it looks rad wicked, but can't they take a prototype home to mom and dad once in a while to see what 50 year old eyes think of it? To give Microsoft credit this one seems to come and go. I suspect we get a patch tuesday, someone installs it and sez "damn, we got the wrong color scheme again" and fixes it. Next patch tuesday someone else installs it and sez "damn, we got the wrong color scheme again" and fixes it. Lather rinse repeat.

    The first 2 can be fixed by downloading different apps, I have yet to find a fix for the third.

    1. Re:My top 3 daily UI fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy: You have to download a different operating system.

  22. Untrustable (do lotsa evil) by rojash · · Score: 1

    Who the heck trusts google products anymore - this must be their 5th Tasks app which obviously they will shut down after couple years. People must be fools to go with any 2-bit google app they wont haven't a hope of getting any revenue for.

  23. Google Home can't do more than a shopping list.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..yet we're harping over font issues?

  24. It already has two task apps by JohnStock · · Score: 1

    ..Google Keep and tasks built into Google Calendar Seriously, the way Google duplicates apps is a sign of a company with multiple personalities.