Slashdot Mirror


Russia Is Attacking US Forces With Electronic Weapons In Syria, General Says (yahoo.com)

john of sparta shares a report from Yahoo: American forces in Syria are increasingly facing attacks from Russian and Syrian electronic warfare weapons, as Moscow uses the conflict to test its future arsenal. General Raymond Thomas, head of the U.S. Special Operations Command, said that Syria has become "the most aggressive electronic warfare environment on the planet," Breakingdefense.com reported. Speaking at a geospatial intelligence conference in Florida, Gen. Thomas said that Russian and Syrian regime forces "are testing us everyday, knocking our communications down, disabling our [EC-130 aircraft]."

The Lockheed Martin EC-130 Compass Call is one of America's most advanced electronic warfare weapons. Based on the C-130 Hercules, the plane was developed to disrupt enemy communications, radar and command operations. The craft's presence in Syrian skies gives Russia the chance to test its weapons against the best the U.S. has to offer, whether directly or through its Syrian allies. Earlier this month, four anonymous officials told NBC News that Russia has also been regularly targeting smaller U.S. surveillance drones. One of those quoted said Russian operations were having a significant impact on U.S. capabilities. The sophisticated attacks were even successful against encrypted signals and anti-jamming devices, the official said.
Slashdot reader john of sparta adds, "Well, it's war; not a surprise..."

11 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. This cuts two ways... by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The craft's presence in Syrian skies gives Russia the chance to test its weapons against the best the U.S. has to offer...

    At the same time it also gives the US a sample of the best Russia can throw at them and the effect that has on US tactics which have relied on battlefield networking, large numbers of remote controlled drones and the apparent assumption that these communications will never be significantly disrupted or even completely disabled. Let's just hope that this lesson will be better heeded than those learned by the Americans who fought the Japanese in the run-up to WWII. Their reports were filed away or ignored by the Pentagon which ignored the threat because the reports contradicted their preconceptions about the Japanese.

    1. Re:This cuts two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At the same time it also gives the US a sample of the best Russia can throw at them..

      Hah, keep thinking that..
      This isn't (yet) a full on war between the US and Russia, both sides are *not* deploying 'the best' as they'll be needing them in the event that they do directly engage each other.
      As an example, at no point (according to a ex-colleague who worked on them) have any of BMEWS systems been run at 'full capability', the point being to try 'steer' Russian tactical planning in specific directions based on observed capabilities. Now, this is not to say that the Russians don't know this, they do, so any overt display of their tactics in regards to this have to be taken with a large pinch of salt.
      Ditto re this story, the Russians deploy various EW tactics, the USians bleat 'Nasty Russians, their EW degrades our ability to function..' both countries analysts then sit and try figure out by how much the other lot are taking the piss..

      Oh!, the games people play....

  2. Same thing in Ukraine by quonset · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the beginning of the Russian attack against Ukraine, the Russian military has been using and testing its electronic warfare capabilities. They were even able to track an app Ukrainian artillery units were using to calculate their fire and use it to target the units.

    The OSCE monitors routinely report their UAVs are being jammed while over Russian-occupied territory. Also, these monitors report on a regular basis the presence of Russian mobile electronic jamming vehicles.

    Fortunately, as was stated further up, this jamming has given us a look into Russian procedures and allows us to find ways around it or at the least, to mitigate it. As a result, Ukrainian military units are able to communicate and coordinate their activities to target Russian military personnel on Ukrainian territory.

  3. Re: Not only there by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That was in 2008. Get with the times. Those years are over.

  4. How dare they by melted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How dare they interrupt our electronic weapons with their own electronic weapons!

  5. Free strategy by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this is such a concern, I've got a strategy the US can use to combat this: Get the hell out of Syria.

    It's ridiculous to be offended/upset that someone is using countermeasures against the drones being used against them or their allies.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Free strategy by butchersong · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think in a sane world we would need to articulate a very detailed and compelling reason to go to war. In this world the onus would not be on those skeptical of actions like this to justify not going to war. Doesn't that seem like a world worth working towards if most of the cost to each of us is simply pausing to take a breath and honestly listen to the other side?

      Here are a few reasons I believe this should not be happening 1) congress has not approved it. 2) the refugee crisis in Europe caused by this and our previous actions in Libya. 3) What reason do we have to think that overthrowing another secular ruler will result in anything other than the crap we've seen in Iraq and Libya? A rather comprehensive list of our work to date: master list

  6. Re:Syria & allies don't attack,they defend mot by butchersong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sadly.. this isn't far off the mark. The thing is most of the people around me are beginning to wake up. Everyone I knew supported the original Iraq war. I haven't really spoke with anyone that supports this crap in Syria and I live in rural America. Most everyone including me is Republican.

  7. Re:Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your map says it all: Look at all that red! It's commies, commies I tell you. They've taken over all those counties, and are on the way to impurify our precious bodily fluids!

  8. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The US actions in Syria aren't self serving, it only tried to serve Israel/Saudi Arabia and their self fulfilling paranoia vis a vis Iran. It would have been far cheaper for the US to just stay out of it and only fight Isis in Iraq (and actually fighting them straight from the start). Arming ISIS and then subsequently "bombing" them and then finally actually bombing them when their former pet dogs became a little too rabid has done nothing but bring grief to the US. It didn't even help their Sunni allies, Saudi Arabia is off worse in some ways.

    In the end only Israel is laughing as it's hold on the Golan is strengthened. The US was played.

  9. Electronic counter measures by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do electronic counter measures qualify as attacks, especially when the US military are flying war planes in sovereign Syrian airspace? Oh the US military are such poor, delicate victims of these evil Syrian radio waves. Why won't the Syrian military stop?

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.