Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Reaches Its Natural Conclusion As A Dating App (buzzfeed.com)

Facebook will soon include a dating feature in its service, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced at the company's F8 developer conference in San Jose Tuesday. From a report: The service will throw Facebook into a sphere it's long been adjacent to but never entered. The social network already has online dating's critical ingredient, a robust graph of people's connection, and services like Tinder, Bumble, and Hinge have been built on top of it. Now, it's getting into the dating game itself.

"There are 200 million people on Facebook who list themselves as single, so clearly there's something to do here," Zuckerberg said. "Today, we are announcing a new set of features coming soon, around dating." The feature will be opt-in, and will not match users with people they're already friends with.
Update: Facebook has clarified that married people too can use the dating service.

117 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. I can't use that by AlanBDee · · Score: 3, Funny

    My wife's on facebook. jk

    1. Re:I can't use that by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      My wife's on facebook.

      I know, I just went out with her.

    2. Re:I can't use that by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      It annoys me. There are so many temptations out there and it's depressing how much easier we are making things like this. Messenger was bad enough.

      I know I'm an old fuddy-duddy but it does make me sad.

    3. Re:I can't use that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I porked her. Hopefully before you did? Went out with her last Friday.

    4. Re:I can't use that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I porked her. Hopefully before you did? Went out with her last Friday.

      That would explain the rash

    5. Re:I can't use that by EETech1 · · Score: 2

      No, the rash was already there Thursday.
      Or are you talking about that thing that's starting to grow on the corner of her lip?

    6. Re:I can't use that by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you could hold Facebook responsible if they hooked you up with someone who then gave you an STD?

      Like they would have to know that!

    7. Re:I can't use that by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could even match people who are currently on bad dates, and redirect them to each other?

    8. Re:I can't use that by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      It's real easy to delete messages in FB messenger. Even if you delete an SMS, it's easy to see who messaged who when the statement arrives.

      Sure the NSA can possibly look at your old Facebook messages but not your average curious or specious wife/husband.

    9. Re:I can't use that by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Huh? You only get alimony if you're divorced. Do you live somewhere that punishes you for cheating on a successive spouse?

    10. Re: I can't use that by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I run into that as well. It enables her to live in a "fake" world outside our marriage.

      Nothing is more frustrating than when we are fighting, and then she sees something on Facebook that makes her happy then as soon as she puts the phone down she is angry and snapping at me again. It really feels terrible to have that feeling that an online world brings her more joy than her real world.

  2. I used it... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    got a date with a hot Nigerian Princess.

    1. Re:I used it... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      did she want an advance in advance of your date?

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:I used it... by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      No, it was too secure our fortune from her recently deceased father's gold mine in Africa. All she has to do, is go there, and prove we are married, and she can claim our riches.

      I sent an extra $100,000 so she would ship me my gold instead of taking the chance she won't return to be the "able wife" she has promised. I'm smart enough to know she might just be using me!

  3. creep date by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    This has the makings of some very creepy dating scenarios and introductions, like in the super market or stuck in traffic.
    "Honk at the blue lexus if you want a date"

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:creep date by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Guys will be making extensive use of the new Clear History button.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re: creep date by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      You're throwing out warning flags like confetti at New Years. I'm not surprised your online dating experiences have sucked.

    3. Re:creep date by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The idea of having some man ask me for sex makes me want to die.

      ....I remember you!!!

      How are you doing?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:creep date by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      You're working from the assumption that women aren't getting come on messages on facebook already.

      This (presumably) opt-in service will move looking for love types to a semi-walled off part of Facebook.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re: creep date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She's throwing warning flags faster than Starbucks throwing out black people!

    6. Re:creep date by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's 50:1, but most dating sites are filled with pictures of "ringers" (both male and female) that may even be stolen from other sites. Needless to say, these are essentially bot accounts that won't supply. Worse are the ones that send you a message within minutes of you creating an account -- that's obviously either a bot, somebody on the company payroll, or a catfisher. And yes, about half of the women that messaged me were catfishers, as evidenced by the fact that they knew nothing about the town they claimed to be from -- and some even admitted to being someplace other than what they claimed in their profile. Then of course there are the "accidentally set my age much higher" so that they would match with men in their 50's despite using a picture of a 20 year old... yeah, catfishers. Again, I assume women have the same issues I saw.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:creep date by mentil · · Score: 1

      Coming soon: Precog Dating
      Wear these clothes (Amazon link included), with this hairstyle (barber-bot configuration link included), stand at this spot (Google Maps link included) at this time (alarm setting link included), looking in this direction (Google Earth link included), and say to this person (Facebook link included) this phrase in this tone with this body language (Youtube link included).
      First date guaranteed.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    8. Re:creep date by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      That's next level stuff, perhaps in FB 2.0?

  4. I can see it now.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Shopping for a Russian wife on Facebook. Then you find out she's a GRU operative and you get blackmailed into serving Putin. Most likely make you run for public office.

    All kidding around aside.. most online dating is just fail, fail, fail to start with, and 'Facebook dating'? Seriously? It's too early in the week to facepalm this hard.

    1. Re:I can see it now.. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I met my wife through an online dating website, 12 years go.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:I can see it now.. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      All kidding around aside.. most online dating is just fail, fail, fail to start with, and 'Facebook dating'?

      It depends on what you are looking for.

      When my wife died, I got on POF. I had a lot of success meeting people who were also "looking for a serious relationship." The sad fact was that almost all of them just wanted a quick fun time (which is fine but choose that in your profile.) It was a very jading experience.

      I found my current wife there, though.

    3. Re:I can see it now.. by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      All kidding around aside.. most online dating is just fail, fail, fail to start with, and 'Facebook dating'?

      It depends on what you are looking for... I had a lot of success meeting people... I found my current wife there, though.

      Right... it depends on your expectations. Online dating can also be good dating practice too. Years ago the dates I went on via online dating services made me more comfortable being on a date, asking good questions, interacting more positively, reading subtle cues, etc. I didn't find my soul mate online, but online dating wasn't a failure either because the experience gained by online dating helped when I met my wife [the typical way] through a mutual friend.

    4. Re:I can see it now.. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Met my GF on JDate.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re: I can see it now.. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Hah, I wish!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    6. Re:I can see it now.. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      ...and she just turned 24!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:I can see it now.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Facepalm is probably the main dating service they use.

    8. Re:I can see it now.. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I had a lot of success meeting people who were also "looking for a serious relationship." The sad fact was that almost all of them just wanted a quick fun time

      They were just being polite to you.

    9. Re:I can see it now.. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Then they saw their bodies as nothing since that is the fun time I was referring to.

    10. Re:I can see it now.. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      +1 funny :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  5. Won't match with friends? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You should be able to opt into that, too. There's people on my friends list I don't know all that well.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Won't match with friends? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      No, you've already been friendzoned by them on Facebook.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Won't match with friends? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      You can just message them directly for a date if you're already friends, you don't need another app.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Won't match with friends? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I tried that. Her response? "I have a girlfriend..."

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  6. Why not match with friends? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Why not match with friends? Make it "opt in", so if both people poke each other, they get matched :) If you already know someone, it might be a good tool as well.

    1. Re:Why not match with friends? by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      If you already know someone and you have romantic feelings toward them maybe you could not be such soyboy and um say something?

      Seriously you want "poke" someone on facebook because you are to afraid to speak to them?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Why not match with friends? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I'm happily engaged, but I also don't see the reason for excluding friends from dating if both parties are willing.

    3. Re:Why not match with friends? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I want to finger somebody on Facebook, but the Zuck hasn't implemented the ~/.plan file feature yet.

    4. Re:Why not match with friends? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. You don't need a new FB feature to connect to someone you're already connected to, on Facebook.

  7. And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Facebook busted for human trafficking.

  8. HA by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always hated that so many popular dating apps decided they required a Facebook login. They desired all that extra data and, while I was willing to give a small company that info, I was not willing to give Facebook it.

    Now they are all about to have their business destroyed by the behemoth they fed in their demand for a slightly easier login and extra non-dating related data.

    Honestly, if you want to make your own business, only an idiot sets themselve up as totally dependent on one supplier. That makes you their middleman, nothing more.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:HA by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points so I thought I'd just respond with my complete and total agreement with your glee for the exact reasons you mention. :-)

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:HA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I always hated that so many popular dating apps decided they required a Facebook login.

      Which dating apps require you to have a Facebook account?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:HA by antdude · · Score: 1

      It's not just dating apps. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:HA by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Federated Login has its purposes - mostly in outsourcing some important security concerns. Would I trust a poorly written web site not to leak my password hash? Or to hash my password in the first place? No. Facebook is a bad example, but there are multiple options.

    5. Re:HA by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 2

      Tinder did, for instance, but not anymore.

    6. Re:HA by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Bumble also used to do this, though now they allow a Facebook account with just a first name. There are others as well.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    7. Re:HA by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I always hated that so many popular dating apps decided they required a Facebook login. They desired all that extra data and, while I was willing to give a small company that info, I was not willing to give Facebook it.

      Erm... I used a fake facebook with fake details. Most people do. It gives you something to talk about on the first few dates.

      Hell, I still use my fake facebook for meeting... ahem, Ladies in foreign nations. It sees more activity than my "real" facebook these days.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  9. Coming soon by dysmal · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Facebook Divorce app!

    1. Re:Coming soon by chispito · · Score: 1

      The Facebook Divorce app!

      I suspect Facebook has been involved in enough divorces as it was.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  10. "Will not match users with..." by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    ... The feature will be opt-in, and will not match users with people they're already friends with.

    Is that so? Sounds to me like maybe someone neglected to do their homework.

    1. Re:"Will not match users with..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will it match users with people they've Facebook stalked? Asking for a friend.

  11. Honest Question by forkfail · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why, despite the number of folks posting submissions are we getting buzzfeed sourced articles with no submitter except msmash or BeauHD? Seriously - I had to go back two pages on the firehose feed to find any submitted articles except one AC submitted one.

    --
    Check your premises.
    1. Re:Honest Question by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think?

    2. Re:Honest Question by forkfail · · Score: 1

      ... they have run out of cute ideas for buzfeed videos that even have a tenuous connection to reality, so are trying to arrange things such that they can make one about "10 Dead Tech Websites That Used To Rule The World, and The Greybeards That Died With Them"?

      --
      Check your premises.
    3. Re:Honest Question by mentil · · Score: 2

      The firehose has been full of spam for years. Simple solution: only accounts with Excellent karma can post submissions to firehose. Gameable, but probably good enough.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    4. Re:Honest Question by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The story submission system has been broken for a while. Everything you submit gets marked as spam, and then it stops you posting comments too, and you have to email the site staff to get it fixed but your submission remains in the spam folder anyway... So naturally people got fed up of being punished for submitting stuff.

      Allegedly it's fixed now, but I have not tried it yet. Maybe later today.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. The only good that can possibly come from this.. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Since Facebook is a "free" website you wont have a bunch of paid actors on the site stringing lonely people along trying to keep them subscribing to service.

  13. Actually by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    This could be useful. I was recently on okcupid (formerly the best of the bunch) and they seem to have lost their way.

    They sent me an email proclaiming that I'd been liked, and received a message. Great!

    Nothing in my inbox.

    Re-read the message, and it explained that in order to see the message, I'd have to click through a bunch of random profiles and swipe, and that if I'd happened to have swiped the particular user who messaged me, then I'd get to see said message.

    I thought it was a bug or scam.. but apparently that's how it works now. Needless to say, I wasn't able to see the person's message. Love lost!

    But seriously, it kinda blew my mind. Dating sites have one purpose: connect people together. okcupid hired someone who clearly didn't understand what their raison d'etre is, and made their site, essentially, pointless. Maybe they were looking for a way to exit the market slowly for some reason. Or maybe the person they hired was a trojan from Facebook. :p

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:Actually by dargaud · · Score: 1

      OKCupid was started by some pretty good statisticians. For a while they had (still have?) a regular blog with statistical analyses of their users and it was fascinating to read. User analytics before it was a fad.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:Actually by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I can imagine two reasons they might have done that.

      One, it's more like Tinder which is their main competition these days.

      Two, the biggest complaint I've heard about online dating has mostly been that women are absolutely inundated with messages and consequently barely respond to any of them so men never get any responses so they just spam every woman so women get inundated with messages and so on in a vicious cycle. If you can only see messages from people you also "like" (without first knowing that they like you enough to message you), then women won't be so inundated with messages that they stop responding, so men will actually get some responses, and men will have less incentive to spam every woman with "sup", breaking the vicious cycle.

      Of course the obvious way to game that is to just "like" everybody, so you can receive messages from anybody. Which again gets back to copying Tinder, where many guys just swipe right(? I've never used it, but up and down would be way more intuitive) over every. single. profile. and hope that any of them at all will swipe right on them too.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re:Actually by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      I can imagine two reasons they might have done that. One, it's more like Tinder which is their main competition these days.

      Aye; I'd read that... but to me it makes no sense. I chose okcupid over Tinder specifically because Tinder isn't very useful to me.

      I can get laid any night of the week. I don't need some silly web site to facilitate. But meeting like-minded people / potential life partners - that's tough.

      The best way for okcupid to acquire and retain users is to offer something that Tinder doesn't, right? But they seem to have abandoned it. In fact I went and installed Tinder to see what all the fuss is about as a direct result of their change.

      Two, the biggest complaint I've heard about online dating has mostly been that women are absolutely inundated with messages and consequently barely respond to any of them so men never get any responses so they just spam every woman so women get inundated with messages and so on in a vicious cycle. If you can only see messages from people you also "like" (without first knowing that they like you enough to message you), then women won't be so inundated with messages that they stop responding, so men will actually get some responses, and men will have less incentive to spam every woman with "sup", breaking the vicious cycle.

      Hey, I get it .. but why not just add a checkbox: "ignore messages from people I dislike / haven't liked?" No need to force it on everyone. Kind of one of those baby / bathwater things.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    4. Re:Actually by guyniraxn · · Score: 1
      Women swipe yes pretty indiscriminately as well, still resulting in more matches they can handle. Having been on Tinder dates, multiple women have admitted this to me.

      Swiping also leads to people treating the whole thing like a game, how many matches can you collect? "Oh, look how many I have! What's your score?"

      Matching and then opening communications with someone about a shared interest gleaned from what little there is in the profile still yields an extremely low response rate because so few are really trying to connect with anyone.

  14. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really not what we meant by "fuck you", facebook...

  15. Re:Libeling me JustAnotherOldDouche? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    APK, I like the cut of your jib. Don't let anyone spread lies about you.

    [Listen you guys (especially you dirty little fucks), you wanna come after APK, you'll have to come through me to do it.]

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  16. This is all about making Facebook "sticky" by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right now Facebook is fighting the #DeleteFacebook movement as trivial as that is in the grand scheme of things. Regardless, it still presents a threat. Thus Facebook has to come up with ways to make you less likely to move off their platform. Thus a dating app makes sense if you're single or "single." It will keep all that ad revenue on their platform or so they believe.

    BTW, despite what they say, if Facebook thinks for one second that they can make a pile of money from quick hookups, they'll go there too.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:This is all about making Facebook "sticky" by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      #DeleteFacebook is pretty big problem for them actually. Us relics from the late 70s and early 80s probably are not going anywhere but the younger folks just might if enough of the chums also use something else like Signal or whatever.

      Its also true that if FB is perceived negatively new people won't sign up when they reach teen/young adulthood. And FB absolutely has to show growth in the teen/ya market place otherwise the advertisers will leave and the investors will follow.

      #deletefacebook might not cost them many current users but if it slows key demographic growth that is every bit as bad for them

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:This is all about making Facebook "sticky" by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Facebook has plenty of ways to work around this problem, since they have so much cash. Consider that Microsoft is perceived as 'cool' by a lot of kids because they have the Xbox. Also, they have Minecraft so they have plenty of other kids on board, even if those kids don't know it.

      A lot of the Facebook deleters are going to Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, so big deal.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:This is all about making Facebook "sticky" by Tom · · Score: 1

      BTW, despite what they say, if Facebook thinks for one second that they can make a pile of money from quick hookups, they'll go there too.

      I doubt it. Only an idiot would do their flings on a track-everything-you-do site like FB, and the second someones wife spots something on their news feed and throws a tantrum, the media will be all over it and FB will suffer more than it gets. It isn't at the point anymore where any PR is good PR.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    4. Re:This is all about making Facebook "sticky" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Us relics from the late 70s and early 80s probably are not going anywhere

      I've moved on from Facebook... I'm still young and cool!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  17. Re:More like the affair app by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

    SMS is harder. An old flame would have to still have your number (assuming it never changed.)

    Facebook gives easy access and also allows people enough of a window into your life to fake their way into looking like there is an emotional connection.

  18. Something to do? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    "There are 200 million people on Facebook who list themselves as single, so clearly there's something to do here," Zuckerberg said.

    He says that as if it was a problem to be fixed.

    Fuck you, Zuckerberg. No wait, I didn't mean it that way!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Something to do? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If Facebook can connect people and convince them to breed, they will have the connections all conveniently pre-made for them in coming years.

  19. What can possibly go wrrong with this? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    (sarcasm intended).

    When kids that use facebook start getting recommended to other people as potential dates just because of a bad setting, they are going to be in sooooo much shit for this....

    1. Re:What can possibly go wrrong with this? by mentil · · Score: 1

      No more than underage users of dating sites who claim to be over 18. So long as facebook disallows under-18 profiles from opting into this, they can say it's a good-faith effort. Lawsuit averted.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:What can possibly go wrrong with this? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If people were perfect and nobody ever made mistakes, sure.

      The thing is that since those dating sites require that you not be a minor to even *use* the service, a false representation of one's age will have to be deliberate.

      Because facebook allows minors on its site (to a minimum of 13), such a setting could plausibly be entirely accidental on the part of the user.

      One could only argue it's good faith on facebook's part if minors were prohibited entirely from using the service, because then the onus is not on the user to misrepresent themselves. Otherwise a simple accidental setting that would not have otherwise prevented them from being on facebook in the first place (because they are still over 13) could result in all kinds of bad shit.

  20. Facebook morphing into Fuckbook? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    Wonder how many people will use this feature as a quick "hookup"?

    1. Re:Facebook morphing into Fuckbook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's ok. They'll get the un-treatable clap and we'll all point and laugh. Go ahead, fuck like rats! Knock yourselves out.

    2. Re:Facebook morphing into Fuckbook? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Many people would value being able to see someone's Facebook profile and history, as a way of filtering out dangerous creeps. I can see it being a popular feature for that alone.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Facebook morphing into Fuckbook? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Wonder how many people will use this feature as a quick "hookup"?

      Including or not including the number of people who are already doing that? Not to mention the "ladies" looking for Johns.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  21. Yeah but... by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

    Judging from the typical FB feed, all the interesting and sexy singles (real ones, not bots) are the ones who aren't on Facebook.

    1. Re:Yeah but... by mentil · · Score: 1

      This could end up reducing average time spent on facebook. People dating are generally not spending time on facebook at the same time. If your date IS spending lots of time on facebook during your date, there probably won't be another date.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  22. Facebook Gains a Weakness by deadboy2000 · · Score: 2

    This could actually undermine a key branding strength that's enabled Facebook to hold on for so long -- people don't mind staying superficially "connected" with old friends whom they never talk to, but in the roller coaster quest for love, a failed relationship could linger like moldy cheese in your timeline . . . every time you see that little blue icon you're reminded of all the disappointment and pain . . . better to just "delete Facebook" and start fresh on a new app -- after all there are plenty of other fish (apps) in the sea!

  23. Re:Libeling me JustAnotherOldDouche? by EETech1 · · Score: 2

    I just figured he has a couple hotkeys configured to insert HTML tags?

    Why, do you think he used an Arduino and Delphi to make a MIDI interface to some foot pedals that convert the stomping of his feet to the proper text format in real time?

  24. About time by Verdatum · · Score: 2

    This is honestly long overdue. If they manage to do this well, this could get pretty popular pretty fast. I've never gotten any joy out of Facebook, but I could honestly see myself giving this a try.

  25. That's fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    In one sentence, you're one of "us", men. In the next you are one of "we", women.

  26. Quite incredible by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


    20 years ago many people thought it was a bit crazy to "meet people from the internet"

    How many times does Facebook need to be exposed as a political manipulation tool and seller of your data to whomever pays?!

    Fuck Facebook.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  27. Dating Scam by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    I fell victim to a dating scam through a Facebook friend request. It is too easy to pull this off on FB.

    The scam artists got my name on a list and I was still getting friend requests from complete female strangers with all the hallmarks of a dating scam (no mutual friends, too few friends, account opened too recent, no mutual interests, location too far away, etc)

    Since then I have changed my account settings so that the only friend requests I can receive are from mutual friends, and only my friends can view my timeline. That effectively stopped the scam artists.

    I have zero interest in using FB as a dating service after that experience.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  28. Ashley Madison 2.0 by TommyNelson · · Score: 1

    waiting to hapen

  29. The new Safe by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The reason all sorts of dating apps were using Facebook logins was to get access to your social graph, so could could tell if a match was known to someone you know, or perhaps connected more distantly... the idea being you could ask someone else about them, or at least be a little, more assured they were a somewhat normal person.

    The interesting thing is, they were not (AFIK) ever sharing anyone's facebook account with anyone else. But if Facebook turns to dating it seems like they would, which I think would raise a lot of concerns with people... I would want to know someone better than just "I might want to date them" before I ever wanted them seeing my Facebook account (though these days I imagine that's not really possible since someone can just google your name).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. First Rule Of Internet by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    In one sentence, you're one of "us", men. In the next you are one of "we", women.

    There may be some confusion in his words, but I just use the First Rule of Internet: The person shitposting is always a man.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:First Rule Of Internet by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      In one sentence, you're one of "us", men. In the next you are one of "we", women.

      There may be some confusion in his words, but I just use the First Rule of Internet: The person shitposting is always a man.

      True, although he never actually claims to be a woman. He says "The idea of having some man ask me for sex makes me want to die." but he never actually claims that he himself is a woman.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  31. Online Whores by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    So, FB is finally going down that last vestige of online moral prostitution and becoming a dating site. Picking up for all the lost Craigslist space...
    Next they'll be selling sex toys online.
    All the more reason to quit FB.

    1. Re:Online Whores by dyfet · · Score: 1

      Didn't myspace also go down this path during it's fall?

  32. Hot or Not Y'All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this the original purpose of Facebook?

    1. Re:Hot or Not Y'All by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of Assbook...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  33. Re:The only good that can possibly come from this. by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there's no bots on Facebook.

  34. Re:Libeling me JustAnotherOldDouche? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Slow news week?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  35. Re:The only good that can possibly come from this. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    There's bots, and just like all other chat services since the beginning of AOL, and they will continue trying to lure people to other websites, but there is no financial incentive for the site owners themselves to deceive people the same way. Matchmaking is not Facebook's only purpose (unlike Match.com), and their business model is based on data mining, not direct subscriptions (at this point).

  36. When? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    When will Facebook start kissing me and tucking me in at night?

  37. Re:The only good that can possibly come from this. by omnichad · · Score: 1

    What difference does it make whether the bot is from Facebook or an outside platform? This new service would enable it.

  38. Re:Libeling me JustAnotherOldDouche? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Slow news week?

    No, it's part of my new anti-cyberbullying campaign. I've been appointed the Ambassador to Slashdot as part of the First Lady's efforts to combat online bullying.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politic...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  39. Re:Libeling me JustAnotherOldDouche? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Why, do you think he used an Arduino and Delphi to make a MIDI interface to some foot pedals that convert the stomping of his feet to the proper text format in real time?

    I don't know why, but I actually LOL'd at that.

  40. Yeah, that's a good idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Facebook is exactly the place where you should put intimate details about you, knowing how trustworthy they proved to handle all the ordinary privacy information about you.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  41. Goodbye Coffee Meets Bagel by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    This move will probably kill dating apps that were built upon Facebook, notably Coffee Meets Bagel. CMB was built upon the idea of linking up friends-of-friends on Facebook's network. This will probably be one of the major causalities. Other popular dating websites probably glean data from Facebook, but they have their own independent databases allowing them to stay standing albeit with greater competition.

  42. Missed opportunity by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    PornHub should add a dating function that matches people up with others that are into the same kinks... er, not like I would need that sort of service, no sir... I mean, all I do is straight missionary, no kinks at all!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  43. Re:The only good that can possibly come from this. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    a bunch of paid actors on the site stringing lonely people along trying to keep them subscribing to service.

    I first ran into that kind of 'paid actors' on CompuServe back in about 1987. There were ostensibly female 'mods' who would socialize with you and kinda flirt.

    This was back when connect time on CompuServe was about $12.00 per hour billed to your credit card. Oh, there was a modem pool that was 'half price' at six bucks an hour if you wanted to connect at 300 baud.

  44. Facebook not creepy enough already! by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    I'm a bloke, so being realistic, I don't have stalkers and nobody is searching FB for nudie pics of me.... but, if I was using FB for dating, would I really want a stranger browsing my old photos and viewing my contacts? This hands over more info to a potential date/psycho than I am comfortable with.

  45. Could be useful, maybe by Rastl · · Score: 1

    I mostly use Facebook for the groups now. So there's a whole lot of people who share interests with me already filtered out of the general herd. It might be nice to see if anyone there matches my other interests and is local to me. If nothing else I can find people who could be real life friends without being Stalker McCreepy by random messaging.

    I wondered how long it would take for them to wind up this function. It's a social media application and dating is a social activity. Should be interesting to watch the process unfold.

  46. I'm single by choice! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I can quit any time I want!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  47. Doesn't entirely compute. by Northdot · · Score: 1

    Facebook's revenue is based on advertising, and they want to eliminate an entire highly active sector of advertising on their site? (dating apps)

    It's a bit mystifying. Anyone shed some light?

  48. Re:What a minefield by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    > This is complicated by new anti-rape attitudes (not laws) proclaiming it's
    > okay for 17 year-old female to fuck a 19 year-old but not a 20-year-old. (Do
    > any US states claim a 17 year-old female can fuck, but only other 17 year-olds?)

    Check with a lawyer. https://www.ageofconsent.net/ should not be considered an official source, regardless of how well-intentioned they are. There are some jurisdictions that have "close-in-age exemptions". This is also known as a "Romeo and Juliet clause". Both of the lead characters in that Shakespeare play were 14.

    Other jurisdictions are "zero-tolerance" assholes, and *BOTH* participants can be charged with statutory rape, and listed on the sex-offender-registry if they're both under the age of consent when they have sex. Things are difficult in the USA in that you're potentailly looking at over 50 different sets of laws, including territorries (Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, etc)

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  49. Isn't that how it started? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    No, like seriously - it was some tool for college students to work out which of the women were worth trying to pork. Instead of, you know, looking at them from across the bar and trying.

    I just finished deleting all my facebook data. That's it - all gone. I'm guessing that'll fuck up their interrelationship data more than just deleting the account.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"