Slashdot Mirror


Congress Is Quietly Nudging NASA To Look for Aliens (theatlantic.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The search for extraterrestrial life, in general, has continued over the past decades, of course, carried out by academic institutions around the world, by people like Tarter, one of the field's best-known seti researchers (and the inspiration for Ellie Arroway, the protagonist in Contact, Carl Sagan's 1985 classic science-fiction novel). But they wouldn't get any help from the feds. "[Senator Bryan] made it clear to the administration that if they came back with seti in their budget again, it wouldn't be good for the NASA budget," Tarter says now. "So we instantly became the four-letter S-word that you couldn't say at headquarters anymore, and that has stuck for quite a while."

That could soon change. Lawmakers in the House of Representatives recently proposed legislation for NASA's future that includes some intriguing language. The space agency, the bill recommends, should spend $10 million on the "search for technosignatures, such as radio transmissions" per year, for the next two fiscal years. The House bill -- should it survive a vote in the House and passage in the Senate -- can only make recommendations for how agencies should use federal funding. But for seti researchers like Tarter, the fact that it even exists is thrilling. It's the first time congressional lawmakers have proposed using federal cash to fund seti in 25 years.

113 comments

  1. Administration going overboard with immigration by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they're worried about illegal aliens from other worlds.

    1. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by omnichad · · Score: 4, Funny

      More like they've finally given up on finding intelligence terrestrially.

    2. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by dj245 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now they're worried about illegal aliens from other worlds.

      More likely someone in the supply chain made a campaign contribution.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    3. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space...

    4. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're trying to find the planet Trump is originally from and beg them to take him back home and keep him there. xD

    5. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They saw "Paul" on Congress movie club presentation last Friday. It confirmed everything they suspected about the British.

    6. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cause there's bugger-all down here on Earth!

    7. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took long enough!

    8. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      More like they've finally given up on finding intelligence terrestrially.

      They're just trying to figure out what planet Trump supporters are from, and what color the sky is there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by jmccue · · Score: 1

      I am surprised they are not asking NASA to look for Angels, maybe with how intelligent Congress is I think the misspell angel.

    10. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by gtall · · Score: 1

      Jesus, don't give them any ideas, are you crazy?

    11. Re:Administration going overboard with immigration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldn't they just tell NASA about rosswell? :-)

  2. Why the change? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying it's aliens, but...

    1. Re:Why the change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't happen under Obama!

    2. Re:Why the change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the change? Simple. Capeshit.
      Capeshit should never have hit the big screen. It was a mistake which has not only lowered the quality of the movie industry, but has now reduced the IQ and EQ of society to the point where even politicians are swept into this brain-cell-lowering "cultural" wave.
      Now it's not Capeshit's fault, the fault lies in the fanbase of Capeshit who are like roaches when it comes to the persistence of validating their emotional and mental retardation by pushing it into every nook and cranny of society and playing validation games for this bile and piss of a genre.
      The Black Plague was once known as a physical disaster for society, Capeshit is now the mental equivalent.

    3. Re:Why the change? by FranklinWebber · · Score: 3, Informative

      FTA:

      'So, why now, after 25 years, do lawmakers appear willing to lift SETI’s taboo status? The short answer is that someone in Congress is into it. The provision comes from Lamar Smith, a Republican congressman from Texas, who worked with the SETI Institute to craft the language, according to SETI researchers. '

  3. Real Aliens or Immigrant Aliens ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look for real aliens from another planet or non-us citizens who are refered to as "aliens" in usa in a very "friendly" manner .

  4. Only the kind that are ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... illegal.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  5. Administration going overboard with walls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait till you see the wall for that...charged to the aliens.

  6. Obsolete radios, to use TeraHz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 3 points to say.

    The 1st point: the alienigens are not illegal, the government that goes against them is illegal. It is due to humanity's reasons and not mankind's reasons.

    The 2nd point: the language that was used for radio transmissions to outer space is illegal, they should consider to learn 1st the signals of the radio receptions.

    The 3rd point: the governments and many peoples had charged this planet Earth with an excess of pollution, contamination, etc.

    1. Re:Obsolete radios, to use TeraHz? by youngone · · Score: 1

      Is that you amanfromars1?

  7. Surveillance of extra-terrestrial activities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're trying to get ahead of moon/asteroid/mars-based missions by other countries or companies by allocating money to put up space-based surveillance systems

  8. Was this influenced by recent Navy aviation video? by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There were a couple of recent FLIR videos taken by F/A-18s off the coast of San Diego that were interesting. I'm not saying they were aliens, but they had the kind of aura of respectability, or at least more than your usual MUFON chapter can muster, that might interest a congressman.

  9. Is this the best time? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Yes, I want to find alien civilisations, but wouldn't it make more sense to invest in better instruments first? We've still barely begun with exoplanet studies. How about better ways to get data on those. Once we have a good map of where the potential earth-like planet are, we'll know where to point the radio telescopes. Maybe we'll even get a spectrum showing a planet with a high level of free oxygen - it may not be intelligence, but evidence of any alien life at all would be welcome. Even single-celled.

    1. Re:Is this the best time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have to choose one - we can invest in both approaches.

    2. Re:Is this the best time? by Ken+McE · · Score: 1

      SuricouRaven:
      Once we have a good map of where the potential earth-like planet are, we'll know where to point the radio telescopes.

      Let's not limit ourselves quite this early. We don't know if there is any correlation between earth-like planets and high level civilization.

    3. Re:Is this the best time? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Yes, I want to find alien civilisations, but wouldn't it make more sense to invest in better instruments first?

      And what, exactly, do you think they'll be actually spending money on in their search for aliens?

      Assuming this gets past the talking and into the budgeting part of government, they'll be spending pretty much their entire budgets on better devices for detecting aliens.

      Well, except for the parts they spend on schmoozing Congress for more budget, and the "going to international conventions" in places that are, coincidentally, really nice vacation spots....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:Is this the best time? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Every civilization, including high level technical ones, that we have knowledge off has been on an Earth type planet. Seems like a reasonable starting place.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  10. SETI is a waste of money by Ecuador · · Score: 2

    OK, the idea is great, we can't find intelligence on Earth, let's search in space. And I am the first to tell you that the chance of us being alone in the universe is minuscule ("would seem like an awful waste of space" to quote one of the greats). But we say we are certain that we are not alone, because of the vastness of the universe and then we seem to forget that reasoning when it comes to SETI. The fact is, we can't pick up a "technosignature" across significant distances and yet, even for a universe "densely packed" with life, we would still expect distances to be at least in the order of thousands of light years. With our current technology, we can detect "earth like chatter" over just a couple of light years. There is hope that if the Square Kilometer Array project is completed we could perhaps detect over 100 light years. Which is nothing in the cosmic scale. So, to detect someone you need them to send you a targeted powerful emission. If you look up the literature, we haven't really been doing it ourselves - now and then we select a target and send a signal. Well, when I talked about the vastness of the universe, that includes time as well (which explains the "thousands of light years" being optimistic - it still has to be simultaneous civilizations). So you target a few star systems and you broadcast to them, you have to remember someone has to be "listening our way" at the exact time they arrive - given the cosmic time scales measured in billions of years, the minutes, hours or even days you might broadcast for, are nothing.
    You can thing of it simply: if other civs are like us, they are mainly listening, so no-one will hear anyone. And it makes sense, listening is easy, transmitting is hard, why put effort on it when you won't really hear back (at least anytime soon)?
    Obviously $10 million is peanuts for the US government (perhaps one set of wheels for an F35?), so pursuing such activities in this case is not damaging (and if used right it could help with radio-astronomy's popularity - although I think Contact has done that as well as it can be done already), but the little money that goes into space science could be spent better.

    PS. Yes, I still think crypto-currency mining is more wasteful than SET@home...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:SETI is a waste of money by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should just build a gigantic transmitter and start sending. Not because we want a reply, but for all the other civilisations who are desperately searching for a signature. Do it for them.

    2. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Troll

      If you looked at the Sol system from the Alpha Centauri system, and managed to pinpoint Earth, what would you see? Not a whole hell of a lot; you likely would not know whether there was any life on it at all, let alone sentient life with a technological 'civilization' (such as it is). On the other hand if you point a very sensitive radio telescope at us from that distance, and your signal processing is well advanced, you might very well pick up the remnants of our various wavelengths of radio communications.

      That's why SETI is not a complete waste of time.

      Furthermore: compared to all the stupid pointless bullshit that has literally orders of magnitude spent on it annually? SETI is a bargain.
      If you're going to dump on SETI, then you have to dump all over all the hideously expensive space telescope programs going all the way back to Hubble.

    3. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, if there was right now a civilization exactly as advanced as humans at Alpha Centauri, they STILL would not be able to detect us! That's the whole point, not even from the nearest star system! You seem to have disregarded the point of the GP post...

    4. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess we might have a chance of detecting extremely advanced civilizations that are inhumanly altruistic (or exhibitionistic?) and have harnessed the energy of stars using Dyson spheres to power their massive omnidirectional "look at me I'm here" transmitters!

    5. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure because we're at the penultimate height of our technological development and won't be able to develop newer and better sensing and signal processing capabilities. Oh well okay we'll just sit here in our own shit until we run out of resources and die out, IT'S FINE, REALLY, no need to look elsewhere! Don't be stupid.

    6. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well okay we'll just sit here in our own shit until we run out of resources and die out, IT'S FINE, REALLY

      So, you agree that we should start spending money on space exploration, start with a base on the Moon perhaps, start building infrastructure there, then Mars etc?
      What does SETI have to do with not siting in our own shit when it currently has almost zero chance of giving us back?

      Yeah sure because we're at the penultimate height of our technological development and won't be able to develop newer and better sensing and signal processing capabilities.

      Sure, if we develop those capabilities we should definitely start listening again! If we could detect over hundreds of light years at least, then SETI would make some sense, but now it's better to try and get some humans off the earth.

    7. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Oh FFS.. we can do ALL THE ABOVE SIMULTANEOUSLY. SETI budget is a drop in the bucket compared to so many other things! JUST FUND IT FFS.

    8. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump would build Trump sphere to keep the aliens out.

    9. Re:SETI is a waste of money by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure because we're at the penultimate height of our technological development and won't be able to develop newer and better sensing and signal processing capabilities.

      The reason no other civilizations are bothering with us is because we have people who still can't use the word "penultimate" correctly.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re: SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add the wasteful ways of our current banking systems. Crypto is 100 x more efficient.

    11. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Ken+McE · · Score: 1

      SuricouRaven:
      Maybe we should just build a gigantic transmitter and start sending.

      We have no idea what is the local threat level or what is considered proper behavior. Let's lurk a while before we dox anybody...

    12. Re:SETI is a waste of money by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Yeah, well, for sure they understand English.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    13. Re:SETI is a waste of money by gtall · · Score: 1

      Wrong metric. What should be used is the difficulty of picking up a technosignature in vastness of time. It turns out the Universe is really, really big....so big you won't believe it....amazingly amazing big.

    14. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should just build a gigantic transmitter and start sending. Not because we want a reply, but for all the other civilisations who are desperately searching for a signature. Do it for them.

      One word for you: Extracom.

      Google it, It's been done.

    15. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you looked at the Sol system from the Alpha Centauri system, and managed to pinpoint Earth, what would you see? Not a whole hell of a lot; you likely would not know whether there was any life on it at all, let alone sentient life with a technological 'civilization' (such as it is).

      The angular separation between Earth and Sun is almost null from interstellar distances. To look at Earth from distance equates to look at the Sun, with all the interference that it entails.

    16. Re:SETI is a waste of money by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should just build a gigantic transmitter and start sending. Not because we want a reply, but for all the other civilizations who are desperately searching for a signature. Do it for them.

      Don't worry, we already are. The combined total of all our aeronautical radars is such that it could be detected with our own tech up to 150 light years or so away. Do so was one of the more reasonable suggestions by Stephan Hawking for looking for aliens before he died.

    17. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you looked at the Sol system from the Alpha Centauri system, and managed to pinpoint Earth, what would you see? Not a whole hell of a lot; you likely would not know whether there was any life on it at all, let alone sentient life with a technological 'civilization' (such as it is).

      That depends on whether the Earth transits the Sun from Alpha Centauri's perspective (I don't know if that is the case). But any place that can see such a transit would be able to do a spectral analysis of the sunlight that passes through the Earth's atmosphere and see molecular oxygen and industrial pollution. The pollution would be a sure sign of intelligence. Molecular oxygen isn't stable over a long time frame (since it would oxidize whatever material is available, thus removing it from the atmosphere), so seeing it is a very strong indicator for life.

      The assumption that an alien civilization would use radio signals to communicate is just that, speculation. So limiting ourselves to radio detection seems to be a short-sighted approach.

    18. Re:SETI is a waste of money by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Would that actually look intelligent though, or just like a star was emitting particularly strange radio signals?

      Something simple would do. -- --- ----- -------, repeat.

    19. Re:SETI is a waste of money by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The pollution would be a sure sign of intelligence.

      I don't have any point to make here, I just wanted to admire that sentence.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re:SETI is a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump would build Trump sphere to keep the aliens out.

      Maybe Trump can build a wall.... IN SPACE... and make the aliens pay for it... I am so very glad that I do not live in the US :-)

    21. Re:SETI is a waste of money by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Would that actually look intelligent though, or just like a star was emitting particularly strange radio signals?

      Something simple would do. -- --- ----- -------, repeat.

      It wouldn't be a star, it would be a planet as the signal would change and disappear when behind the star. Not an expert myself, but I assume that such EM radiation on such wavelengths would not be that natural. It would be high energy on narrow bands for which I assume there are no known natural causes for it to resemble. These narrow bands have obvious unnatural uses as radar and would thus be used by any civilization for similar purposes. This would be even greater when speaking of astonautical radar due to the powers involved in using it to map objects in space for a civilization actually going into space.

  11. What if we find them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's always been a lot of talk about the communications technology, but what if we really find them? I'm not worried about any alien invasion (the speed of light fixes that problem). How would the knowledge that we're not alone affect the human psyche, and religion? If we can decode any messages, might that result in some big problems, especially if some countries decode before others to get a technological/military edge?

    1. Re:What if we find them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odds we are not alone is better than the odds to hit a lottery.
      I suppose finding other worlds with life wouldn't be much of a big deal.
      People may expect the find but would quickly pay more attention to sports, gossip and shows like Survivor.
      It would quickly become old news and a new TV series.

      .

  12. Our system looks like the last days of Rome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a pot on the stove burning, but I'll take care of it later, just as soon as I find me some aliens!

  13. Re:Yeah, I kind of agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America's significant embrace of Trump/Putin has also made me strongly tempted to give up on humanity to a great degree also.

    Why don't you do the rest of us a favor and kill yourself.

    If you lack the courage to do that, at least shut the fuck up with your pointless whining.

  14. The Aliens Are Already HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    white light
    red light
    fuck you dog

  15. I wonder... by sycodon · · Score: 2

    ...have there been any credible studies that actually took a hard look at the implications of learning there is in fact intelligent life out there?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:I wonder... by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      That's not an easy subject to study.
      It could bring our entire species together, realizing we're not All There Is Out There, and we'd stop acting like idiots.
      On the other hand it could start the War To End All Wars, and we'd snuff ourselves out.
      Any way you look at it there would likely be massive socio-political upheavals over it -- as well as plenty of deniers, refusing to believe 'scientists' and their 'lies', especially I imagine religious types.
      Hell, some people, if presented with an actual living breathing alien would stand there and say it's all fake.

      Uncertainty aside I'd love to live long enough to find out we're not alone in the Universe.

    2. Re: I wonder... by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Presenly the USA is nowhere near the "we bring all people together". At the moment it is more a " How to alienate your friends and foes, and accidentally trigger some wars" show.

    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be more worried about the implications of revealing our position to unknown alien life.

    4. Re: I wonder... by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah yeah I know I know you're preaching to the choir on that one.

      In another thread some jackass is crying about how stupid 'superhero' movies are and how they're dumbing down everyone. Fact of the matter is people need their heroes and we don't have any to speak of right now so they turn to movies. Same goes for the opioid crisis: the world sucks, it hurts to live for some, so they turn to whatever they can to make the pain stop -- even if it's killing them when they use it to escape.

    5. Re:I wonder... by Humbubba · · Score: 1
      sycodon said

      ...have there been any credible studies that actually took a hard look at the implications of learning there is in fact intelligent life out there?

      Who knows? Let's find out - it's a great opportunity to employ more scientists. In fact, let's milk this for all its worth. Give biologists and zoologists 50 million to look for aliens amongst us. Another 50 million and geologists might discover if they've been here before. Maybe if we convince those religious types that we might find Adam's tomb on Mars, where Jesus ascended to, and maybe even that portal to the 3rd sphere of heaven, science could be properly funded for generations to come. Hallelujah!

    6. Re:I wonder... by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Don't worry. That "interstellar travel" thing? Not gonna happen.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen this Slashdot video yet? Have you bought the family friendly Goat C shirt?

      - FatCashewsLoveMe

    8. Re:I wonder... by gtall · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, people are more interested in what's on their cell phones than alien life. Anyhow, they can't get here from there very quickly. That fact alone will cause people to harumph and move on.

    9. Re:I wonder... by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yeah, anything to distract them from studying evolution. They should just have it banned like Kansas, no creature is now allowed to evolve in that state lest they generate humans from monkeys. See, one doesn't have to understand science to screw it up.

    10. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it, people are more interested in what's on their cell phones than alien life.

      And this, my friend, is the Great Filter. This technology is turning the people so stupid that it has become an existential threat. Mankind is loosing its mind. Anti-science is the order of the day. The fabric of society is unraveling. We are doomed, heading straight to the precipice. The Fermi Paradox has been more than explained. We're doomed.

    11. Re:I wonder... by Humbubba · · Score: 1

      Ah, come on, they'd buy evolution if the Heritage Foundation was willing to sell it.

  16. what if Extraterrestrials landed by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and they made religions obsolete, and made the nation state with governments obsolete, and made military and police obsolete, and turned this planet in to a utopia, or on the other hand a planet with human slaves mining resources so they can take them to their home planet

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Unless some advanced (more than us) alien civilization either has faster-than-light ships, or is willing to commit hundreds of thousands of individuals on thousands of ships to invading the Earth, I don't think you need to worry too much about the latter of your two scenarios. The best outcome so far as I'm concerned is if we made contact with an alien civilization, even if it took decades for the signals to travel the distance. That in and of itself would be a game-changer for our species.

    2. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard humans make great batteries.

    3. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how ETs would make either governments or religions obsolete. Military I can understand (doomsday machine) and police as well (oracle like crime solving). But utopias have rules, which require governments to set them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      This is truth. Alien contact wouldn't obsolete religions or nation states. Those are to ingrained in our society. Religions would just find some other way to interpreter their sacred scripture to work in aliens. I believe the Catholic Church has made some noise along those lines.

      As for it being a game changer for our species. I think you over estimate our species. It would be a game changer for you and I, but the rest of the species probably not so much. I'm never disappointed in humanities ability for self deception. Most humans wouldn't believe it was an alien if one shoved a probe up their ass.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    5. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by Ken+McE · · Score: 1

      Rick Schumann :
      Unless some advanced... alien civilization either has faster-than-light ships, or is willing to commit hundreds of thousands of individuals on thousands of ships to invading the Earth, I don't think you need to worry too much about the latter of your two scenarios.

      Or they could send a handful of Von Neumann replicators and let whichever one makes it do the job.

      The best outcome so far as I'm concerned is if we made contact with an alien civilization, even if it took decades for the signals to travel the distance. That in and of itself would be a game-changer for our species.

      A game changer, yes, but what if the new game is an advanced form of Russian Roulette? We can't blindly assume that they will like us. For all we know, they will view the arrival of a new species in their neighborhood much the way you would view the discovery of a nest of fire ants in your garage.

    6. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The probe is completely convincing. Can confirm.

    7. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      "To Serve Man" (The Twilight Zone, 1962):

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=De4u1Zz7Yt4

    8. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by Kjella · · Score: 1

      or on the other hand a planet with human slaves mining resources so they can take them to their home planet

      It seems unlikely there's any raw material valuable enough to send out of the Sun's gravity well to another star. Or that anyone who could invade Earth from space would need human slaves. I think the good case is they'll talk. The bad case is they'll wipe us out with a bio-bomb and send a seed probe to turn Earth into their colony. I don't see a whole lot of middle ground...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If we found aliens they would likely be too far away to make much difference. Messages might take centuries, millennia even to get to them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by ayesnymous · · Score: 1
      "they made religions obsolete"

      Will never happen, regardless of aliens.

    11. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's other dangers besides physical invasion. I don't know what the aliens would be able to transmit to us, but I'm not confident humanity as a whole would take it well.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    12. Re:what if Extraterrestrials landed by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      and they made religions obsolete

      They don't have to. Religion doesn't do well in a modern country. Even in the heavily religious US, "none" as a religious affiliation is growing quite fast. It may take a while, but religion as a force in the world is fading. (Which is fine with me; religion as a force in this world has a pretty bad track record, far worse than religion with no political power.)

      However, assume that they have a religion that's reasonably compatible with one or more human religions. I'd expect that to have a massive effect.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  17. SETI is a bargain compared to other stupidity by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Compared to all the other hideously expensive bullshit the government spends money on annually, SETI is a drop in the bucket and so worth it for what it could tell us. The only reasons Congresscritters don't like funding it is because uninformed and unimaginative taxpayers don't like it.

    Now, the real question is: Why all of the sudden would they want to fund it? Even though the language is extremely vague, if they suddenly want to fund it again they must have an ulterior motive (being politicians and all).

    1. Re:SETI is a bargain compared to other stupidity by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Here you go, just in time.

  18. Trump must be Scientologist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you can call him just about everything else too.

  19. Colossal waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're just elated that their jobs will continue. But there's only disappointment waiting at the end of all this money...'cause there's nobody out there.

    1. Re:Colossal waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the janitor cleaning toilets at NASA is smarter and has more value as a human being than you worthless anonymous basement dweller with no life.

    2. Re:Colossal waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you know this how?

  20. natural progression by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Since the US is really an Oligarchy, and that Oligarchy has grabbed over 50 of all wealth, they're looking for the next financial conquest - and why not spend other peoples money to find it!!
    https://www.theguardian.com/in...

  21. haven't you been paying attention?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the ridiculous crap the current script writer has been foisting off on us lately, I can only infer that he is a drunk and a hack of the lowest caliber. You can bet your bippy we're getting aliens thrown into the plot any day now. As a sentient being I can not countenance insulting and literally incredible baloney.

  22. Re:Yeah, I kind of agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime a fucking trumptard opens his mouth... everytime.

  23. Creative redirection by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    $10E6 would be useful for improvements to detect and identify radio signatures in various ways. It could be used for satellite dishes and algorithm research; I'd personally like to see it put towards improving BOINC, which helps a lot of projects, including SETI.

  24. $20 bucks says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's because they know torture doesn't work. The aliens they captured wouldn't give up the location of their home world, nearest base, or their plans. So they're scrambling to find out from what direction they will attack before their scouts are considered missing... :p

  25. I have a better idea... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    They should point one of those honking great telescopes at Congress and look for assholes. You can bet they'd be happily counting away for weeks afterward.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:I have a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should point one of those honking great telescopes at Congress and look for assholes. You can bet they'd be happily counting away for weeks afterward.

      You don't need a telescope for that. The assholes are so large you can easily see them with the naked eye. But why would you want to....ew.
      One case in which light pollution is a blessing.

    2. Re:I have a better idea... by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Just for the record. I now have to clean my monitor, thank you.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:I have a better idea... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      You raise an excellent point.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    4. Re:I have a better idea... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's one of those little jobs most of us keep putting off, so it's probably for the best. I will accept your thanks solemnly, in the spirit in which you intended to offer it.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  26. Re:Yeah, I kind of agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is he a Trumptard? Because he told you to stop whining like a little bitch in every thread?

    Well sir, I am not a Trumptard. Stop whining like a little bitch in every single thread. The election is over. Get on with your life.

  27. Re: Administration going overboard with immigratio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are in need of another slave labor force. Hopefully without having to subsidized. No more free food, free housing, free medical, free schooling for the kids and get out of jail cards for free.

  28. I found an orange one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's currently President of the United States.

  29. Re:Was this influenced by recent Navy aviation vid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those were probably teasers that upped their game...

  30. Then we form a committee, maybe call it Majestic12 by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 1

    no wait, sorry, it's been done already
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  31. Re:Yeah, I kind of agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America's significant embrace of Trump/Putin has also made me strongly tempted to give up on humanity to a great degree also.

    Why don't you do the rest of us a favor and kill yourself.

    If you lack the courage to do that, at least shut the fuck up with your pointless whining.

    Why don't you do the rest of us a favor and kill yourself.

    If you lack the courage to do that, at least shut the fuck up with your pointless whining.

  32. Congress searching for intelligent life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps NASA ought to direct any effort to search for intelligent life to looking to see if any can be found in Congress.

    1. Re:Congress searching for intelligent life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though come to think of it, I guess they're more likely to find intelligence by listening to any random spot in space than they are looking at Congress...

  33. Re:Was this influenced by recent Navy aviation vid by gtall · · Score: 1

    I'm not believing in them unless I see hot green alien women wearing what is usually considered too few clothes....mmmm, the forbidden pleasure!!

  34. Administration just cut $10M from NASA by sraasch · · Score: 1

    The WH just cut the NASA program responsible for validating greenhouse gas emissions: https://smmry.com/http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/trump-white-house-quietly-cancels-nasa-research-verifying-greenhouse-gas-cuts

    I think I'd rather spend the money bringing this program back rather than feeding ICE more information on potential immigrants.

  35. Where To Start Looking by nowwith25percentmore · · Score: 1

    Hey NASA, you guys might want to check out this strange orange humanoid that has been hanging around the White House.

    1. Re: Where To Start Looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the one that calls himself "APK".

  36. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about stupid. SETI is a stupid program. NASA is a stupid entity. Now combine the two.

  37. Thanks, Republicans !! by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Thanks Republicans, for EXPANDING the government.

    Btw, why do you think you got elected ??
    The only upside here is extraterrestrials are only SLIGHTLY more relevant US interests with NASA than Muslim outreach.

  38. Sciency-sounding bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sound like a distraction for gutting useful NASA science programs. Gut the useful science, but allow some perfectly useless project that won't possibly harm anyone.

  39. They need new signal detection techniques by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SETI is all about sensing and decoding signals deep in a field of noise. Any techniques SETI develops could be put to use by the government to facilitate secure military communications or to detect the encrypted communications of an enemy. This would be similar to the public effort the U.S. put into reaching the moon in the 60's but which behind the scenes was an effort to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles.