Slashdot Mirror


Chrome Tests Picture-in-Picture API To Show Floating Video Popups Outside the Browser (bleepingcomputer.com)

Browser makers are working on a new W3C API that will standardize Picture-in-Picture (PiP) mode and allow websites to show a floating video popup outside the browser window itself. From a report: In the past, picture-in-picture has only been supported inside a web page's canvas as a floating window that only appeared inside the current website, as the user scrolled up and down the page. Some platforms added support for a picture-in-picture mode, but those were OS-specific APIs that worked with all sorts of video apps, not just browsers. Now, the Web Platform Incubator Community Group (WICG) at the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), has released details about a browser-specific API for standardizing picture-in-picture interactions that allow websites to open an external "floating video" popup outside the browser window itself. [...] Chrome and Safari have already shipped out the new Picture-in-Picture API.

24 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. Worst. Idea. Ever. by ErikTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You thought pop-over ads and auto-play videos were bad before?!?? Hopefully this can be disabled...

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm with you on this:

      You thought pop-over ads and auto-play videos were bad before?!?? Hopefully this can be disabled...

      Do. Not. Want.

      I can think of a few legitimate uses for this outside advertising, but I know that advertising will be the main use of this. This WOULD make me switch browsers. I would not use a browser that allows such an egregious violation of my desktop. Implement this and be boycotted.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. Now all the sites that obnoxiously start playing videos when you load the pages (and nothing stops all of them) are going to pop open windows to do the same. Pop-up to the side, pop-up over top, pop-under...

      And is there a limit to how many windows a site can open this way?

      What could possibly go wrong?

    3. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I came here to say this... Who is asking for these features?

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    4. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forget, you are the product. Your opinion doesn't count.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh this is just fucking awesome. I really can't think of any way for it to get better than this!! I thought having the video chase me down the page was the greatest thing since paper cuts and hang nails. But was so fucking WRONG!!!

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    6. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by higuita · · Score: 3, Informative

      use firefox, there you are not the product ... they may still do not listen to you, but at least they are finally slowly disabling tracking

      --
      Higuita
    7. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by higuita · · Score: 2

      firefox quantum had one big component replaced with better, multi-thread code ... there are still many parts to be replaced. Some parts, chrome will always be faster, spawning 100 process to render 5 tabs may be more flexible in terms of performance... but at cost of ram! chrome eats my machine ram with few tabs, while firefox with hundred of tabs stays with about 4GB

      --
      Higuita
    8. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by Causemos · · Score: 2

      This will be used to make those "Your machine is infected" ads look even better for non-tech people to fall for. Anything browser related should be clearly in the browser!

    9. Re:Worst. Idea. Ever. by scdeimos · · Score: 2

      use firefox, there you are not the product ... they may still do not listen to you, but at least they are finally slowly disabling tracking

      Very slowly. This tracking bug is still going after only 17 years, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/s...

  2. Can this be disabled? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

    This seems like a return to the bad old days of pop-up ad windows over pop-up windows, but now with extra bandwidth-sluuuurping video. Disable. For good. With prejudice.

  3. Why? by Train0987 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No user has ever asked for this. Advertisers, yes, but actual users, no. This move should prove once and for all who Google exists for.

    1. Re:Why? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google’s customers are ad buyers. Now this decision makes much more sense, no?

    2. Re:Why? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Window border, scroll bars, single tab wasting space, address bar row, bookmarks bar. Lots of wasted screen space. And then the video playing site would waste more space with its own UI. Plus, no always-on-top option.

      All anyone can do is hope those advocating for a windowless context free area outside the browser window simply to avoid "wasting space" are either kidding or trolling.

  4. News sites terrible offenders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Almost every news site now is already being offensive with their autoplay video that follows you and also jumps around on the page as you scroll down. And the video players don't all work the same -- some of them you click in the middle to pause, some you have to locate the pause button (wherever it may be), some of them can be closed entirely, others cannot. But universally I stop all of these videos. Neither the video nor the audio are wanted.

    Putting these autoplay video sinto a popout window doesn't solve the problem, it only moves the problem into a popout window. W. T. F.

    1. Re:News sites terrible offenders by sims+2 · · Score: 2

      /. is one of few sites today that still plays nice without javascript.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:News sites terrible offenders by higuita · · Score: 2

      use umatrix ... you can enable the main site javascript (and so the site works) and disable the 10 other site javascript that will load all sort of shit!

      --
      Higuita
  5. Stop Using Chrome by ecsyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop using a web browser developed by an advertising company. This is all of our fault, for making Chrome popular.

    1. Re:Stop Using Chrome by Merk42 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly! You should use something like Safari since Apple isn't dependent on advertising dollars and has said how they care about your data and...

      Chrome and Safari have already shipped out the new Picture-in-Picture API

      ...oh...

  6. Which tab do I close to make it go away? by bytestorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This breaks the window to content relation, unless it goes away when unfocused. And if it goes away, why bother having it outside the content window? If the user can't figure out which web page/app generated the pop-out, this feature is only going to cause frustration.

  7. Horrifying by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    Adverts, yes. Bleah.

    What about security implications? Perhaps the "video" simulates other applications, other windows?

  8. There is one positive angle by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    If you are browsing on a phone and lock your phone, the standard dictates a drone deliver a second phone to you with the video still playing where you left off.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. Re:Oh geezey petes by ebyrob · · Score: 2

    Seems like a <blink>GREAT</blink> idea!

  10. Test of W3C by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To be fair "This specification was published by the Web Platform Incubator Community Group. It is not a W3C Standard nor is it on the W3C Standards Track."

    If this ever changes and W3C is willing to pursuit such a blatantly anti-user misfeatures the organization will have lost all remaining respect and legitimacy with me for what little that's worth.