Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Slashdot Asks: Which Is Your Favorite Email Client?

Posted by BeauHD on from the not-my-cup-of-tea dept.

With Google recently rolling out a big revamp of Gmail to mixed reviews, we would like to know which email client you prefer. Are you a firm believe in the "inbox zero" idea -- that is, the approach to email management aimed at keeping the inbox empty, or almost empty, at all times? If you're looking for inspiration, Ars Technica recently published an article highlighting several different email clients used by the editors of the site: Are you the sort of person who needs to read and file every email they get? Or do you delight in seeing an email client icon proudly warning of hundreds or even thousands of unread items? For some, keeping one's email inbox with no unread items is more than just a good idea: it's a way of life, indicating control over the 21st century and its notion of productivity. For others, it's a manifestation of an obsessively compulsive mind. The two camps, and the mindsets behind them, have been a frequent topic of conversation here in the Ars Orbiting HQ. And rather than just argue with each other on Slack, we decided to collate our thoughts about the whole "inbox zero" idea and how, for those who adhere to it, that happens. Some of the clients floated by the editors include: Webmail, Airmail 3, Readdle's Spark, Edison Mail, Sparrow, Inbox by Gmail, and MailSpring.

10 of 406 comments (clear)

  1. Thunderbird or AlPine by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thunderbird for desktop, Pine/AlPine for shell, K-9 Mail for a phone.

    Webmail is for the birds. And I'm not organized or disciplined enough for the "Inbox Zero" cult.

    1. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have thunderbird but don't use it much. I am mostly on webmail for personal mail. Not great but workable.

      I just restored files in Thunderbird for my mom's computer (third time hit by IT scam and she still won't believe that people offering to fix her computer for free are the bad guys). It's a pain in the ass because of how it does things. Proprietary file formats, databases, and such. I've got a lot of old email folders back in normal Unix text format, easy enough to copy around. But outside of Unix no one came up with a standardized mail format. So trying to fix things up, not having a nice way to copy over files was annoying, and trying to fix up weird bugs (it would hang for 10 minutes after startup, possibly due to corrupted database file). Then a day later I find that the address book was missing after all my fixes, and so I'm stuck searching the web for which file to restore so that I don't have to restore from an old backup to a new profile just to get the address book to copy to the real profile.

      Sure, maybe all the mail programs act this way now. But it would be nice if things were easier to deal with - such as a built-in import/export feature for folders and address books and settings (oddly I saw an export option for some things but not a corresponding import). I'm not happy that all these programs seem designed to lock you in for life unless you're willing to start over from scratch.

  2. No web mail by argee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I abhor mail clients that work by publishing your email as web pages (most gMail, Hotmail etc). I also do not like HTML in my mail, nor do I like linked
    pictures and graphics. I use Thunderbird for my (Linux) computer, and K9 for Android, although I have also used AquaMail for Android.

  3. for a dedicated client by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i use Seamonkey suite, it is a browser & email client, and a basic bare bones WYSIWYG html editor and IRC client, (the emacs of the browser world)

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  4. Thunderbird... by vanyel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is the worst one out there, except for all the rest.

  5. Mutt! by dyfet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because it doesn't expose my gpg encrypted email by loading messages into a web view...

  6. Outlook desktop client by DogDude · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't found anything that comes close to Outlook (on the desktop... not the web). I use it with Exchange and IMAP accounts at the same time. Lots of features, and even more with Exchange accounts.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  7. Claws Mail by sombragris · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Claws Mail. It's light on resources, fast, stable, and can deal with gigabyte-sized mailboxes without a hiccup. Moreover, it uses the MH mailbox format, where each email message is a single plaintext file so it's very flexible and if necessary it allows for straightforward manipulation directly from the shell. There's even a nice book available on it.

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
  8. Stay away from Readdle's Spark for iOS! by koick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although it's a pretty good app for iOS (iphones and ipads), I just recently learned that Spark has some serious security issues. Not only do they collect statistics and analytics on your usage (pretty typical), no much worse, they "use the authorization provided to download your emails to our virtual servers and push to your device". Before I had installed it, wish I'd seen the warnings on many websites against using it.

  9. Re:i sense wormsign. by arth1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes but which mail client do you use in emacs. There are about a dozen.

    Yes, but they all lack a decent editor...