Slashdot Mirror
Justice Department, FBI Are Investigating Cambridge Analytica (cbsnews.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News: The Justice Department and FBI are investigating Cambridge Analytica, the now-shuttered political data firm that was once used by the Trump campaign and came under scrutiny for harvesting data of millions of users, The New York Times reported on Tuesday. The Times, citing a U.S. official and people familiar with the inquiry, reported federal investigators have looked to question former employees and banks connected to the firm.
The Times reports prosecutors have informed potential witnesses there is an open investigation into the firm, whose profiles of voters were intended to help with elections. One source tells CBS News correspondent Paula Reid prosecutors are investigating the firm for possible financial crimes. A company that has that much regulatory scrutiny is almost guaranteed to have federal prosecutors interested, Reid was told. Christopher Wylie, a former Cambridge Analytica employee who spoke out about the data sharing practices, told the Times federal investigators had contacted him. The American official told the Times investigators have also contacted Facebook as a part of the probe.
The Times reports prosecutors have informed potential witnesses there is an open investigation into the firm, whose profiles of voters were intended to help with elections. One source tells CBS News correspondent Paula Reid prosecutors are investigating the firm for possible financial crimes. A company that has that much regulatory scrutiny is almost guaranteed to have federal prosecutors interested, Reid was told. Christopher Wylie, a former Cambridge Analytica employee who spoke out about the data sharing practices, told the Times federal investigators had contacted him. The American official told the Times investigators have also contacted Facebook as a part of the probe.
Invented by CNN.
Trolls will try to discredit me by accusing me of being a paid Russian troll. The truth is, the people trying to discredit me are paid DNC trolls, operating with funds supplied by Russian oligarchs.
Gotta hand it to Trump, if nothing else he did what no other politician or internet freedom activist over the last several decades could. He got people to finally care about privacy. People weren't only indifferent. They were slobbering in ecstasy over the likes of google and obama for vacuuming all their PI everyday. Trump changed all of this. Maybe indirectly due to the fact that people couldn't stand him allegedly benefiting but change the game he did.
That they don't like the outcome?
That its ok for commercial purposes, but not in elections?
Clear proof that voters can get accurate targeted information that alters 'default' vote patterns.
That the info/dirt can be used from other countries, legally if the lawyers do their bit properly.
Phoenix operations. Next time there will be the same manipulation from wherever. The issue cannot be resolved as data is global.
Unless the USA enacts data privacy laws, it will remain the wild west, and the best funded party with the most 'tricks' wins.
http://www.politifact.com/trut...
https://ijr.com/2018/03/107720...
Bwa ha ha, Someone using "The View" as a standard for political accuracy.
Go away, you a f-ng useless.
Let's get the Presidential Pardons ready.
Didn't they just change their name? Or am I thinking of some other association of shysters?
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
The fuss is because it benefited Trump. The company scraped a bunch of publicly available info; if it were Obama or Hillary people would be falling over themselves to call it brilliant strategy.
46137
to wrap this case up in another few years.
I'm not gay, you sucked my dick.
The thing to bear in mind here is that Cambridge Analytica managed to obtain only a relatively small percentage of information about Facebook Users. The information it managed to obtain was either information voluntarily provided by users in response to a survey, or publicly-visible information carried by "friends" of the relatively small number of users who took their survey.
Facebook have access to data on ALL their users. They have the complete history of all their users. They have a vast trove of information about what their users do when they are not on the Facebook platform, thanks to a combination of cookies delivered by their servers and the beacons they place all across the Internet, courtesy of Facebook "Like" buttons on popular web sites.
Cambridge Analytica are only getting this level of scrutiny because Christopher Wylie basically left regulators with no choice, after publicly telling the world what CA had the ability to do. An equivalent FB insider, anyone who chose to reveal the full scope of what FB can do, would scare most people silly.
It's amazing to think that people are getting worked up about this relatively small data set obtained by this relatively tiny company, when the data is being held by this behemoth call Facebook, run by a guy who makes no secret of his political ambitions. Talk about elephant in the room.
Oh is that right? Since you know so much then tell me, exactly how many "The View Fact Checkers" would that be?
You can't tell me because you just blew that out your ass!
When is Trump going to shut them down for wasting tax dollars over this idiotic investigation against him? Fuck, they wiretapped him under Obama and still didn't find any dirt.
But unelected people will chase any wild goose to try to get Trump on a technicality. The collusion investigation that was supposed to find communication between Trump and Putin now has, as it's MOST damning evidence, a guy who left the election campaign early on and whose indicted crime was having dodged taxes years before the campaign even began. Now a violation of privacy by a British firm is being argued as the next piece of evidence for the supposed Trump-Putin collusion. That is pure non sequitur if ever there was any. Not to mention that if Trump were indeed colluding with Putin, it would have been easier to have gotten the FSB to hack Facebook and give Trump's campaign access to all the data.
your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
The company has morhped already:
https://www.metro.us/news/the-...
They are really catching the discarded skin of the snake.
These never seem to go anywhere. There's never enough evidence to convict any significant decision maker of a crime, especially when they have enough resources for counsel that is able to obfuscate sufficiently.
At best you see some kind of vague conspiracy charge -- which really, anyone could be charged with -- or real bullshit stuff, like mid-level flunkies who get convicted of something like "lying to the FBI", which seems to make a serious felony out of either honest people's inadvertent "lies by omission" or the natural reaction people have to the intimidation of being questioned by a serious law enforcement organization.
So a handful of people might wind up scapegoats on technicality charges since prosecutors don't like failure publicity. No film at 11, you can find this story buried on the back of the sports section.
...is that the Campaign didn't use their data. They used RNC data because it was more accurate.
That CBS is reporting they did use it IS Fake news, otherwise known as a fucking lie.
They're a foreign firm. Who cares? The damage is done. There are people out there with fucking chainsaws and the Justice Department is going after Cambridge Analytica. Is anyone else sick of this? Yes, Cambridge Analytica fucked up. Ban them from doing business with American firms and slap a huge fine on them.
...shit.
They need to be laying the smack down on Facebook, who harvested the data in the first place. They will never be regulated, will they? I knew the hearing was just for show, and I think Fuckerberg did, too. Absolutely nothing will change unless people stop using these services, and I'm not holding my breath on that one.
I still don't understand how what Cambridge Analytica was doing is any different than any other modern marketing campaign.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
They call you an asshole behind your back. BIGLY.
Yes, but only biased genocidal maniac feminist fact checkers.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
Youre children thank you for your brave Whataboutism. Its very American. Bigly strong & free.
I still don't understand how what Cambridge Analytica was doing is any different than any other modern marketing campaign.
Isn't it obvious? When a Democrat does it it's good but when a Republican does it it's evil!
Not that any of this will matter to you, no matter what is presented when Mueller actually reveals his findings, you'll still think he's innocent, it's a witch hunt, Trump Did No Wrong, it's all a partisan hit job, and on and on to protect your boy.
I'm actually good with believing he's innocent, until there's evidence.
I absolutely *hate* it when some police force make a flashy claim about someone - all the guns confiscated during the search, all the electronic devices taken from the home, nebulous "tip from an informant" - everything is being tried in the court of public opinion nowadays. None of that is evidence of a crime.
Let's not forget that after 9/11 someone was sending anthrax letters to people (remember those?) and Mueller - the lead investigator - ignored a tip about Bruce Edwards Ivins (the perpetrator, from one of Ivins' colleagues) and focused on Steven Hatfill. Mueller went before congress and swore under oath that Steven Hatfill was the person responsible, when in fact there was no evidence implicating Steven Hatfill whatsoever. Among other items, Steven Hatfill had no access to anthrax. The FBI didn't bother to explain this fact, and didn't seem to care.
Steven Hatfill went through several years of hell, having his life turned upside down, condemned in the media, death threats... and was eventually exonerated and sued the government for (IIRC) 5 million dollars.
That's the history of your "unimpeachable, honorable" Mueller.
Remember the indictments of 13 Russian nationals and 3 corporations recently released? It turns out one of the corporations didn't exist at the time of the purported crimes. Mueller indicted the proverbial "ham sandwich".
I like to think everyone is innocent, until proven guilty. and this thing about the court of public opinion is bollocks. Show us the evidence.
I sometimes ask a *question* about how someone appears to have broken the law. For example, Trump is widely believed to be obstructing justice for firing Comey, despite having a memo in-hand recommending it, but the Oakland mayor can warn illegal immigrants of an upcoming ICE raid... and that's not?
Or how Michael Flynn can be charged under the Hatch act for meeting with a Russian diplomat (as a member of the incoming administration, opening dialog and not specifically making claims or policy) while Kerry can negotiate with Iran and European countries to save the Iran agreement... and that's not?
I like to think everyone is innocent, until proven guilty.
Show me the evidence. What you have so far is nothing.
They were rooting for the wrong team. I don't see the issue either so that's all I can come up with.
Found the dumb ass Russian
Yes, comrade, pass the vodka
This Russian has gone to school and can spell three letter word.
What about when WalMart does it? Or Starbucks? Or your college alumni association? Face it, privacy has been gone for more than 20 years now. The only difference is that facebook is a one-stop-shopping-center for gross analytical data and specific targeted marketing.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
What’s genius for Obama is scandal when it comes to Trump: http://thehill.com/opinion/technology/379245-whats-genius-for-obama-is-scandal-when-it-comes-to-trump (Ben Shapiro, March 20 2018)
Let's get back to overthrowing the guy the electorate picked and democracy !!
qanonposts.com
When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
"came bridge anal licking cunts"
So why wasn't Obama investigated by them in 2012?.
The Obama’s reelection team was “building a vast digital data operation that for the first time combines a unified database on millions of Americans with the power of Facebook to target individual voters to a degree never achieved before.” Obama’s new database would be gathered by asking individual volunteers to log into Obama’s reelection site using their Facebook credentials. “Consciously or otherwise,” “the individual volunteer will be injecting all the information they store publicly on their Facebook page — home location, date of birth, interests and, crucially, network of friends — directly into the central Obama database.”
Facebook had no problem with such activity then. They do now, but only because it's Trump.
The former Obama director of integration and media analytics stated that, during the 2012 campaign, Facebook allowed the Obama team to “suck out the whole social graph”; Facebook “was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing. They came to [the] office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”
As soon as Facebook realized that Cambridge Analytica had pursued a similar strategy, they suspended them.
I do not belong to the church of the lowercase 'i'
May 16, 2018
Code Name Crossfire Hurricane: The Secret Origins of the Trump Investigation
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/16/us/politics/crossfire-hurricane-trump-russia-fbi-mueller-investigation.html