Slashdot Mirror
Scottish Students Used Spellchecker Glitch To Cheat In Literacy Test (bbc.com)
Thelasko shares a report from the BBC: Schools are to be given advice on how to disable a glitch that allows pupils sitting online spelling tests to right-click their mouse and find the answer. It follows the discovery by teachers that children familiar with traditional computer spellcheckers were simply applying it to the tests. The Scottish National Standardized Assessments were introduced to assess progress in four different age groups. A spokesman said the issue was not with the Scottish National Standardized Assessments (SNSA) but with browser or device settings on some machines.
Introduced in 2017, the spelling test asks children to identify misspelt words. However, on some school computers the words were highlighted with a red line. Pupils who right-clicked on the words were then able to access the correct spelling. The web-based SNSA tool enables teachers to administer online literacy and numeracy tests for pupils in P1, P4, P7 and S3, which are marked and scored automatically. Advice is being given to schools about how to disable the spellchecking function.
Introduced in 2017, the spelling test asks children to identify misspelt words. However, on some school computers the words were highlighted with a red line. Pupils who right-clicked on the words were then able to access the correct spelling. The web-based SNSA tool enables teachers to administer online literacy and numeracy tests for pupils in P1, P4, P7 and S3, which are marked and scored automatically. Advice is being given to schools about how to disable the spellchecking function.
... suck worse at spelling than students, though.
Better headline: Teachers shocked to discover that students doing tests on a computer knew how to operate the computer.
0) Not all written communication is mediated by electronic equipment
1) Spelling checkers do not include the full lexicon
2) The lexicon changes
3) Different dialects have different spellings, and while you may wish the enforce one dialect's spelling in your prose, any quotations should match that of the source material
etc. etc.
Were that I say, pancakes?
When everyone finally gets there, they're, and their; and it's and its, correct; then, and only then, will I agree with you.
And you know what, "long division" was already ancient when I learned it, over 50 years ago. In the grand scheme of things, 50 more years is nothing, and if it's irrelevant now, it was just as irrelevant then. Call me a dinosaur if you want, but if we take away your calculator I bet I can run rings around you at math.
Shore that is a grate whey too git the deer kids inn two a university coarse.
The test creators failed the test. Really, kudos to those who correctly spelled full words, regardless of the means. Hopefully, they've also learned better than to text "r u ok, lmk" while wearing a baseball hat with the brim in the back.
"National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
If you don't teach kids how to spell, then they will just use emoji to convey their thoughts. In the corporate world, this is completely unprofessional.
For the moment...
Beware of the Leopard.
Some clearly can't.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
If Lennart Poettering invented a language, it would use logograms.
(Firefox's shitty spielchucker doesn't think that's a word. It also doesn't think "Firefox's" is)
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Judging by resumes I've read as of late, I'm amazed if they used anything else.
...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
At my job, being at least 10 years older that any colleagues of mine, writing correctly has become unprofessional. Someone mentioned that my writing was "pretentious" and that I was showing off.
...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
If only there were a way to put the test questions on a medium that did not provide automatic access to spell checking, internet etc.
Darn, I would gladly kill a tree for such a solution.
When it comes to using technology to subvert the education system it's always safe to assume the children know a fuck of a lot more than the teachers.
At a school you'll have maybe three teachers that have the background, interest and skills to look into this shit. You'll have 300 children, and once one knows, they all know.
That's the thing about schools, they're full of people that when appropriately motivated are fucking good at learning things.
Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.
Eye strike a quay and type a word
And weight four it two say
Weather eye am wrong oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.
As soon as a mist ache is maid
It nose bee fore two long
And eye can put the error rite
Its really ever wrong.
Eye have run this poem threw it
I am shore your pleased two no
Its letter perfect in it's weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.
if we take away your calculator I bet I can run rings around you at math
And if we take away their jackhammers, I bet John Henry can bang holes in rock faster than any modern construction worker.
But in all seriousness, English isn't about being able to spell any more than mathematics is about arithmetic. There are higher level skills that we should be striving towards, and so if you want to make an argument that long division is useful (which it very well may be) you should be claiming that understanding it allows one to more easily absorb next-level topics (like calculus or linear algebra) rather than because it allows you to divide numbers without a calculator.