Slashdot Mirror


Canonical Shares Desktop Plans For Ubuntu 18.10 (ubuntu.com)

Canonical's Will Cooke on Friday talked about the features the company is working on for Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" cycle. He writes: We're also adding some new features which we didn't get done in time for the main 18.04 release. Specifically: Unlock with your fingerprint, Thunderbolt settings via GNOME Control Center, and XDG Portals support for snap.

GNOME Software improvements
We're having a week long sprint in June to map out exactly how we want the software store to work, how we want to present information and to improve the overall UX of GNOME Software. We've invited GNOME developers along to work with Ubuntu's design team and developers to discuss ideas and plan the work. I'll report back from the sprint in June.

Snap start-up time
Snapcraft have added the ability for us to move some application set up from first run to build time. This will significantly improve desktop application first time start up performance, but there is still more we can do.

Chromium as a snap
Chromium is becoming very hard to build on older releases of Ubuntu as it uses a number of features of modern C++ compilers. Snaps can help us solve a lot of those problems and so we propose to ship Chromium only as a snap from 18.10 onwards, and also to retire Chromium as a deb in Trusty. If you're still running Trusty you can get the latest Chromium as a snap right now.
In addition, Ubuntu team is also working on introducing improvements to power consumption, adding support for DLNA, so that users could share media directly from their desktop to DLNA clients (without having to install and configure extra packages), and improved phone integration by shipping GS Connect as part of the desktop, the GNOME port of KDE Connect. Additional changelog here.

81 comments

  1. Frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unlock with fingerprint? I had that last year with Fedora 25 KDE and Fedora 25 Cinnamon. I remember it being a pam thing... I thought it was old-hat by now.

    1. Re:Frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the idea is to do this out-of-the-install ... not any need for edit pam.d files or activate permissions via shell commands.

    2. Re: Frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uso Wong

    3. Re: Frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me so solly!

  2. Oh good by bobstreo · · Score: 2

    A new bunch of features to deal with.

    I used MiniDLNA for a while (when I was using a SONY PS3 as a media player, and it worked pretty well. I can't imagine DLNA support is really much of an accomplishment in 2918.

    1. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do me a favor, bro. Check back to the Powerball numbers for late May 2018. It may be tough to come up with those records from 900 years ago, but I'd imagine everything's available on the worldnet for the simple cost of a thought by now.

    2. Re:Oh good by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I use Rygel. There's even a nice GUI for it now. It's trivial to setup. However, Windows comes with DLNA support preinstalled as part of Windows Media Player (or whatever they call it now). Canonical seems hell bent on copying every design Microsoft rolls out. Even the bad ones.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:Oh good by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The heck is DLNA? This one's new for me.

    4. Re:Oh good by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I can't imagine DLNA support is really much of an accomplishment in 2918.

      Typo aside I'm looking forward to 2918, maybe DLNA actually works smoothly by then. I have a mixture of open and closed source DLNA servers, players, and renderers in my house. I'm sure that one seeing the other is based entirely on some random number generator in each.

      Their website says "13 YEARS AND FOUR BILLION DEVICES LATER". A good accomplishment, but I'd be happy enough if even 2 of those devices would actually just work. Zero Configuration Networking has to be the flimsiest concept invented since the first "election promise".

    5. Re:Oh good by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Digital Living Network Alliance. It's been around for almost 15 years now. It's the reason your TV probably shows up in your Windows networking screen. It's a zero configuration system for sharing media and playback capabilities between devices. It's also flaky as crap and only works on a full moon.

    6. Re:Oh good by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Ah okay. Not a protocol, but an industry group or something, and some googling pretty much said "DRM stuff" but didn't really declare that it's a protocol.

    7. Re:Oh good by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. DLNA is basically an alliance that formed guidelines on how all devices should implement a common set of already existing standards in the hope to make them work. E.g. It says all these devices need to support UPnP with configuration W, supporting media formats X, Y, and Z, and if it falls into the device category A then it needs functionality B and C.

      It just hobbles together things that should have been interoperable in the first place to be actually interoperable. For instance, if you enable Media Streaming in Windows 10, the fact that it's DLNA certified guarantees that it will be setup in a way that is discoverable by a Playstation and stream media in a compatible format.

      UPnP as a protocol supports a lot of things which may not be supported by various devices e.g. HEVC. DLNA is supposed to take the guess work out of how to set up servers and clients in a way that everything is supported, so a DLNA v2.0 server disables HEVC streaming because DLNA v2.0 clients can't receive the stream.

  3. What the what? by honestmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been a programmer for a long time. Bunch of different languages, mostly Unix or Linux, some Windows. "If you're still running Trusty you can get the latest Chromium as a snap right now." Is that even English? Or what?

    --
    Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
    1. Re:What the what? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I've been a programmer for a long time. Bunch of different languages, mostly Unix or Linux, some Windows. "If you're still running Trusty you can get the latest Chromium as a snap right now." Is that even English? Or what?

      "Trusty" is an Ubuntu version. That could stand some parenthetical explanation.

      The rest of it should be pretty intelligible to any current Linux user with moderate curiosity and an eye for tech news.

    2. Re:What the what? by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Trusty" is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, codename "Trusty Tahr", released in 2014-04 and supported until 2019-04.
      "LTS" is long-term supported versions of Ubuntu, which receive security updates for five years.
      "Chromium" is a web browser published by Google with all the proprietary parts stripped out.
      "snap" is a packaged application distributed by the Ubuntu store, which runs in a container to isolate its dependencies.

      Translation: If you're still running Ubuntu 14.04, you can get the latest Google web browser as a self-contained package.

    3. Re:What the what? by shess · · Score: 1

      "Trusty" is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, codename "Trusty Tahr", released in 2014-04 and supported until 2019-04.
      "LTS" is long-term supported versions of Ubuntu, which receive security updates for five years.
      "Chromium" is a web browser published by Google with all the proprietary parts stripped out.
      "snap" is a packaged application distributed by the Ubuntu store, which runs in a container to isolate its dependencies.

      Translation: If you're still running Ubuntu 14.04, you can get the latest Google web browser as a self-contained package.

      Whoa. Your translation _is_ super long compared to the original text!

    4. Re:What the what? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      Translation: If you're still running Ubuntu 14.04, you can get the latest Google web browser as a self-contained package.

      Then why can't he (we) just say that? All the pseudo-tech marketing horseshit reminds me of Ballmer's squirting Zune. ffs.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    5. Re:What the what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Trusty" is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, codename "Trusty Tahr", released in 2014-04 and supported until 2019-04.
      "LTS" is long-term supported versions of Ubuntu, which receive security updates for five years.
      "Chromium" is a web browser published by Google with all the proprietary parts stripped out.
      "snap" is a packaged application distributed by the Ubuntu store, which runs in a container to isolate its dependencies.

      Translation: If you're still running Ubuntu 14.04, you can get the latest Google web browser as a self-contained package.

      It was a breaking up the sentence to explain all the terminology. Of course it would be longer than the original. I though it was well done.

      Whoa. Your translation _is_ super long compared to the original text!

    6. Re:What the what? by jofas · · Score: 0

      All, right, old man. I'll get off your lawn. Read a paper, Nixon isn't in power anymore! Oh wait...

    7. Re:What the what? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      "snap" is a packaged application distributed by the Ubuntu store, which runs in a container to isolate its dependencies.

      Surely it's more than that: you can ship a package with its dependencies using RPATH and have been able to do so for years!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    8. Re:What the what? by tepples · · Score: 1

      A snap also runs in a container to isolate the application from the data in your home directory that you have not yet chosen to expose to the application.

    9. Re:What the what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit. I assumed it was talking about the OpenGL renderer called Chromium.
      Google's web browser? DO NOT WANT.

    10. Re:What the what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Whoa. Your translation _is_ super long compared to the original text!

      Just be happy he doesn't explain the following terms: running, Ubuntu, Google, web, web browser, self-contained, package. The resulting explanation may have words like computers, software, and applications in it requiring further clarification. It's explanations all the way back to the dawn of the universe.

    11. Re:What the what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Then why can't he (we) just say that? All the pseudo-tech marketing horseshit reminds me of Ballmer's squirting Zune. ffs.

      Actually it's the well known names describing accurately the very specifics of what is available and to whom. The simplification which you support now includes the possibilities of multiple different browsers and multiple different package installation methods (snap not being the only containerised package system).

      Or maybe we should abstract it all the way: You can do computery things with your computer!
      Slashdot: News for grandmas who don't Google.

    12. Re:What the what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      RPATH is just a way of loading specific libraries from a different directory.

      Snaps are self contained apps delivered with all dependencies in a dedicated filesystem sandboxed from the main system.

    13. Re:What the what? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And that portion of it still needs work. My home directory is on another drive, snap refuses to let me do anything because 'permission denied'. Despite all the bits being set correctly.

    14. Re:What the what? by tepples · · Score: 1

      You're right but not for the reason you may have thought.

      Chromium is the subset of Google Chrome that meets FSF's Free Software Definition and OSI's Open Source Definition (also called Debian Free Software Guidelines). It implements, among other things, an OpenGL ES binding for JavaScript called WebGL.

    15. Re:What the what? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Snaps are self contained apps delivered with all dependencies in a dedicated filesystem sandboxed from the main system.

      Ah I guess the last bit (sandboxing) is the important bit, that you don't get with a simple tar file :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:What the what? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah. There's quite a lot of different containerised systems now to chose from that each offer different features and benefits, flatpak, snap, appimage, and some that take on more virtualisation like docker. Some require installation, others can run standalone, some have command line tools, others not. etc.

    17. Re:What the what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine here on 14.04, with /home as separate partition.

    18. Re:What the what? by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Typing this in Chromium on Trusty Tahr. (with an IBM model M of course)

  4. How many hundreds of megabytes is Chromium... by greenwow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    going to be? IIRC the VLC snap was 190 MB download and about 700 MB on disk.

    1. Re:How many hundreds of megabytes is Chromium... by Thelasko · · Score: 2

      Between Snaps, Unity, and Systemd, it's like Canonical is trying to clone Windows 8.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:How many hundreds of megabytes is Chromium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And worse are the security problems because you have to wait until the snap is updated rather than just a shared library.

    3. Re:How many hundreds of megabytes is Chromium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And worse are the security problems because you have to wait until the snap is updated rather than just a shared library.

      What’s keeping snap maintainers from publishing security updates just as often... actually testing the new library with the program using it maybe?

    4. Re:How many hundreds of megabytes is Chromium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      going to be? IIRC the VLC snap was 190 MB download and about 700 MB on disk.

      So how’s BTRFS coming, I thought Linux had a next gen filesystem with block level dedupe already? Not really there yet?

    5. Re:How many hundreds of megabytes is Chromium... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Snaps sound more like an OS X .app than a Windows app.

    6. Re:How many hundreds of megabytes is Chromium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What’s keeping snap maintainers from publishing security updates just as often ... ?

      First mistake: You're assuming that that the snaps will be maintained.

      Abandonware compiled with shared libraries can get indirect security updates via the the shared libraries, but abandonware compiled as a snap won't get those same security updates.

  5. yeah by Tsolias · · Score: 0

    like it matters.
    "hey guys, we are going to do this and this and this if we don't fail"
    "we are vowed to alienate ourselves from the rest of the *stream, we are vowed to saturate the linux community and its development as much as we can, and if we succeed we will continue to do it, if we fail again we will find new ways to saturate linux"
    "....also new ads, new telemetry, new indexing... but ofc it's opt out, not opt in."
    "K, tnx, bb"

  6. A bunch of useless shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Mark

    1. Re:A bunch of useless shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I’m so happy I have you as my best friend, and I love Lisa so much.

  7. No user directory encryption? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks like Ubuntu 18.x doesn't offer user home directory encryption anymore. Not sure how good/bad/ugly this is, but I thought it to be a useful feature.

    1. Re:No user directory encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i booted 18.04 off a usb to back up some files off a dead windows pc yesterday.. there's no context menu to create a compressed archive anymore. wtf?

    2. Re:No user directory encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank a millennial

    3. Re:No user directory encryption? by PvtVoid · · Score: 2

      You can still download and run encfs. It just isn't supported by default.

    4. Re:No user directory encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      encfs and eCryptFS are two totally different beasts...

    5. Re:No user directory encryption? by hey00 · · Score: 1

      i booted 18.04 off a usb to back up some files off a dead windows pc yesterday.. there's no context menu to create a compressed archive anymore. wtf?

      I thought you were joking, I didn't want to believe you, but in the back of my mind, I feared that gnome devs could be able to do that.

      So I installed nautilus to see... Well, gnome devs probably don't create archives from their file manager, so noone does, so we should remove it.

      I was aware that nautilus had been murdered with in its 3.6 release, but it's even worse now. I don't understand that obsession of dumbing down everything and removing features. Thanks Mate devs for Caja.

  8. Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of incompatible mess are they going to create now?

    Do not want.

  9. Still got SystemD and Amazon Integration. by xack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ubundows 10 still not for consumption by serious Linux users. Plus playing with all this "snap" nonsense instead of plain .deb files.

    1. Re:Still got SystemD and Amazon Integration. by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Well, is snap packages actually do run in a good sandbox, it makes some sense. That would make it a lot safer to install packages from sources you don't really trust. And it would limit the damages that mistakes could cause. They should also be easy to remove, with all their requirements, configurations, etc. And it could allow packages with conflicting requirements in configuration to co-exist.

      That said, snap packages are clearly inferior to a deb when it comes to required install space. And a sandbox is no panacea...as the recent snap that installed a e-coin miner demonstrated.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Still got SystemD and Amazon Integration. by Sesostris+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm using 16.04 LTS and will do the standard upgrade to 18.04 LTS once 18.04.1 comes out. I'll ignore 18.10 and wait until 20.04 LTS to upgrade again after that.

      I'm not sure what a 'serious Linux user' is, but clearly I'm not one. However, "snap" sounds great with regards running new software on an old(ish) system without worrying too much about dependencies (or dependency conflict). Also, although I'm clearly not a 'serious Linux user', I think even I will be able to disable/remove any 'Amazon Integration' should I so wish. (And SystemD comes with Debian, and is not specifically an Ubuntu thing).

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    3. Re:Still got SystemD and Amazon Integration. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where you want to use it, I suppose.
      Snaps for Desktop make sense. You want to install the latest version of Blender, but it requires libraries that Ubuntu isn't yet shipping? Ship it in a snap.
      It makes less sense for server, but even there some of the newer development environments rely on libraries or toolchains that aren't yet in the latest and greatest versions of Ubuntu. In those cases the option of a snap is handy.

    4. Re:Still got SystemD and Amazon Integration. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what a 'serious Linux user' is

      Any user who is creative enough to mix the word Ubuntu and Windows 10 but is too stupid to write "man systemctl" or understand why snaps and deb files are two different things.

      Personally I don't associate myself with serious Linux users. They are intolerable.

    5. Re:Still got SystemD and Amazon Integration. by Bonker · · Score: 1

      That would make it a lot safer to install packages from sources you don't really trust.

      Even think about installing from sources I don't really trust? This was one of my big joys when I was finally able to ditch Windows. I didn't have to install *anything* I didn't trust any more.

      Snaps abstract too much away, IMHO. You don't know what runtime a given snap is going to require unless you dig. There's *another* place for insecure code to run if everything is not perfectly vetted.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    6. Re:Still got SystemD and Amazon Integration. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      `systemd` can be purged and `sysvinit-core` can be installed in Debian, so there is still a choice.

  10. Translation: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We can and will make this Linux distribution worse! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  11. eff off Canonical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you and your apparently completely insecure and absolutely not-audited pieces of fucking shit 'Snaps' Canonical.

    1. Re:eff off Canonical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flatpak sucks donkeys ass

  12. Canonical is comical anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other then Ubuntu is a pretty decent beginners Linux desktop to try and I thought being different with Unity was perfectly fine. At least it looked way better then Gnome 3 does. Now days it seems Canonical can't decide what direction its going to next. Too bad Linux desktop is so splintered because exchanging ideals to create a really nice desktop distro would benefit Linux desktop as a hole. Instead of a hundred or different directions.

  13. Definitions appropriate to the audience by tepples · · Score: 1

    Then why can't he (we) just say that?

    A summary of a news article cannot define every word used therein; otherwise, every summary would become a dictionary. Thus a summary of an article can use without definition any word whose definition that the expected audience of that article is expected to already know. In this case, anyone who runs Ubuntu 14.04 and has installed Google's web browser has seen the names "Trusty" during installation of the operating system and "Chromium" during installation and launching of the browser. Therefore, communication to users of Google's web browser on Ubuntu 14.04 can use terms familiar to users of Google's web browser on Ubuntu 14.04. "Snap" I'll concede, as production use of Snap didn't ramp up until at least Ubuntu 16.04 (codename "Xenial Xerus").

  14. Outside VM ? by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    I try it on a intel tablet, boot greath on the live session, but once installed (bare metal), crash big time. No problem with other distro, look like it's made only to work as a demo.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  15. No snaps here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switching Core Software packages from Deb to Snaps is where me and Ubuntu part ways.

  16. Not the C++ features that are the problem by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    Chromium is hard to compile because it is now a compiler monoculture. Gcc 4.9 has all the features it needs, but because Google now only use a single version of a single compiler, other compilers will be lacking the same bugs as that clang version.

    It is particularly incorrect use of constexpr and noexcept clang has trouble with and thus plagues the Chromium code everywhere as their developers are just scattering it around without understanding it.

  17. Gnome software improvements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they are not just throwing it away, nothing much is improving.

  18. Re: upgrade once 18.04.1 comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kicked 18.04's tires in a virtual machine on release day, and then the next day I backed up my OS partition and then used "do-release-upgrade -d" to upgrade my machine from 16.04.4 to 18.04.

    Why the rush? I didn't want to wait any longer to finally use C++17 compilers. For me it was definitely worth it, and I'll never go back to C++14. (* Please do not tell me about how I could have used a PPA to install C++17 compilers on 16.04. I'll never use a PPA again. For me, if it doesn't exist in the main apt repo, then it doesn't exist.)

    p.s. I've been using Ubuntu as my desktop OS since 8.10, and IMO this was the smoothest upgrade yet.

  19. I sell computers with Ubuntu by default; no more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should say my company sells computers with Ubuntu by default. We will be switching to something else. Even if that something else is just as bad- it at least won't be Ubuntu and we won't be enabling this bad behavior. Snaps needs to be separate. We need to move away from system D, etc. Snaps was the change that broke the camels back though. Not that past actions like Unity were wise. But they were nothing compared to Snap. Snap is a security danger. As far as I can see there is no real way to get away from it- but we can at least undermine Ubuntu's popularity and show that people don't want this and if you do whats not in the people's interests other companies will stop supporting you and you need them to be #1.

  20. Systemd gone yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not? No deal.

  21. Re: upgrade once 18.04.1 comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, you need to upgrade your entire OS and apps just to get a newer compiler?

  22. Gnome is too buggy by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

    After the gnome team made such a big deal of their fresh start with gnome 3, I was surprised years later that gnome was still full of bugs. I used it for a few weeks after ubuntu ditched unity, then changed to xfce. I didn't see anything in the article about fixing bugs . Its all about new features, so I won't be going back to gnome.

    1. Re:Gnome is too buggy by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      why not use modern UI forked from GNOME2, aka MATE? GNOME3 is rubbish

  23. More functions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More Functions Removed from Gnome 3

  24. And that means I need to migrate from Ubuntu. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Still got SystemD ...

    And that means support for the last non-systemd LTS will expire while all the remaining supported LTSes use systemd (or at least use it by default).

    Which means I can't stay with Ubuntu, and have to migrate, to avoid systemd.

    It's been a nice ride, guys. Thanks. But goodbye/

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re: And that means I need to migrate from Ubuntu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend using Debian, it'll be familiar to you and it's fairly trivial to remove systemd from the latest Debian

      http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Debian_Stretch

  25. What difference does it make? by yusing · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Two years after 16.04, 18.04 arrives. Perceptible *useful* differences, as far as I the end-user can tell?

    Miniscule. Again.

    So while I'm glad the boys and girls are enjoying their fine-tuning experiences, in my experience, upgrades to 16.04 would have sufficed. The rest basically boils down to make-work.

    --

    "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    1. Re:What difference does it make? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't do a complete reinstall you won't see the visual changes. The switch from unity to gnome is a big change....

  26. Re: upgrade once 18.04.1 comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Essentially yes, because every version g++ since 5.0 (or was it one of the high 4.x releases?) requires a compatible ABI revision, which means you need different versions of the c++ standard library runtimes that aren't compatible with any of the binaries on your PC.

    I guess maybe if you're hardcore enough, you could figure out how to install both ABIs and then pass some flags or environment variable or whatever, but I'd rather not have that kind of headache.

    Or you could do your builds in a virtual machine and use ssh to mount the VM's files on the local machine for editing, or you could set up X-forwarding to view your VM's editor on your local machine.

  27. Re: upgrade once 18.04.1 comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess red hat is hard core then, on rhel 6 and 7 the system g++ is 4.4/4.8 but you can easily install g++ 7 by doing yum install centos-release-scl-rh && yum install devtoolset-7, and the produced binaries are guaranteed to be binary compatible.

  28. Re: upgrade once 18.04.1 comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hate gnome 3 so much that i stoped recommending ubuntu to people and refuse to downgrade to 18.04

  29. the werm ciber thret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the remot link seems to be a werm wich u can remove off this devise that these persons have beewn following me around and steeling my digital id and certafucates and llc linceings from my companeys and d.h.s asio id and assets teck this is y i am you,sing this old device that was out of date it could andrea ink or net it is a areal recording werm that person suesan devenport is suesan and katy katalinta hudid philapenio north korean witch use to be a boy from my investergashons and iraky i.r.a gladston yeppoon QLD .and all thare asosheits .u can poll it from this device it.s on the flash drive there r sum outher persons on it name jorden .who will no more .with a bit of xstratshon of intal i have no way to go aney fether all my cash and tranceport id,s ext ext have stolen i dont sine in four this rieson i just my satalite tracking four id throu amossomega my sistoms (s) i am chello oner soley and holey of chello,s download speed austar .it woud be grate if you,s could retern all my companey doc back to areginal and take down the persons who r trying to say thay owne my companey i have allways reinvested all my cash from it and now i wont to start spending it i carnt get it sum one is allways trying to steel the trancefers or ringing saying thay r my financechal planer thay rnot .i hope this halpes u gratlyill leve this runing so u can retreve it please thanku.my name is stephen james chellingsworth hi..