Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Rebuilding the PDP-11/70 with a Raspberry Pi (wixsite.com)

Posted by EditorDavid on from the retro-computing dept.

"You could look at this as a smallish PDP-11/70, built with modern parts," Oscar Vermeulen writes on his site. "Or alternatively, and equally valid, as a fancy front panel case for a Raspberry Pi."

Long-time Slashdot reader cptnapalm writes: Oscar Vermeulen's PiDP-11 front panel, modeling a PDP-11/70 in all its colorful glory, has been released to beta testers. This is Mr. Vermeulen's second DEC front panel; his PiDP-8 was released a few years ago. The PiDP-11 panel is designed to work with a Raspberry Pi running simh or, possibly, a FPGA implementation of the Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-11... In addition to the front panel with its switches and blinkenlights, also included is a prototyping area for the possibility of adding new hardware...

UNIX and later BSD were developed on the PDP-11, including both the creation of the C language, the pipe concept and the text editor vi.

96 comments

  1. Pi does it all by amiga3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm always amazed at what people use a Pi for. While bad mouthed for it's limitations it seems the Swiss Knife of tiny SBC devices.

    1. Re:Pi does it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People who badmouth the Pi for its limitations are not the ones that are interesting.

      The interesting people look at the limitations of the Pi (especially the single core variants) and say 'Challenge accepted'. Then they sit down and make it do things the people above didn't think possible.

    2. Re:Pi does it all by mystik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Before the Pi, you'd see all sorts of devices hacked to get new firmwares and new capabilities into them, that the original creator hadn't even dreamed of. Remember the Chumby? Hacking various routers?

      The Pi platform lets you skip that sometimes difficult hacking phase, and onto the, "What could I do with this hardware?!"

      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    3. Re:Pi does it all by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I think you are right. A lot of very creative people now are free to just use the hardware without having to fight against the deliberate crippling of the hardware by it's creators. You'd see someone hack the Playstation to get it to do cool stuff and then a firmware update would wipe that out.

    4. Re:Pi does it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a situation of all you got is a hammer, nothing really interesting happens with a pi that cant be done with a little bit of thought and effort

    5. Re:Pi does it all by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I'm always amazed at what people use a Pi for.

      An IBM mainframe emulator on a Pi would be really impressive . . . impressive, but probably not very useful. And there is probably a butt-ugly rat tail of legal issues.

      Now, Linux on Z is supposedly Open Source . . . so that could be possible legally . . . but again, probably not very useful.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:Pi does it all by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      You'd see someone hack the Playstation to get it to do cool stuff and then a firmware update would wipe that out.

      Well sure, if you were dumb enough to accept the firmware update instead of sideloading API updates designed to force you to upgrade...er...speaking for a friend.

      It's sort of cool that they made this but I refuse to accept a PDP-11 that doesn't contain disc packs, tape drives and green screen terminals. It just doesn't seem right. Unlike screwing Sony in the wake of that massive rootkit scandal and a copy protection system relying on you not being allowed to run a hex editor. That seemed pretty much obligatory.

    7. Re:Pi does it all by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      Where I work the IBM tape library was 'automated' decades ago. It is used exactly the same way, but it is, of course, all DASD drive now. And that's virtualized in a SAN inside a VM cluster that merely mimics a tape library.

      I use PuTTY daily. At work it's HostExplorer, they can jam PComm up their Java. Lots of VT100 emulations out there.

      Needless to say a PiDP-11 would handle mSATA fine. Imagine giving your VMS install more data space than existed in the world when it was introduced.

      First-world problems. With a Pi at the heart of it I suppose I/O speed wold be realistic...For 100+ users.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    8. Re:Pi does it all by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My brother runs a serious shop that still uses RPG. SO go ahead, either a S/3 or S/38, that code is still running businesses. And yes, IBM would probably be a hassle, but then again that old S/3 code is still running on Zseries emulating AS/400-S/3x-S/3...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    9. Re:Pi does it all by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 1

      DECwriter II terminals are also acceptable.

    10. Re:Pi does it all by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Please, Please, can someone 3D print a TU56 emulation to the same scale!

      I don't care if it uses standard 1/2" tape, and the data is actually on SD cards, but it should look like its on DECtape.

      A paper tape reader/punch to scale, but with full size paper tape might be nice, but I am not sure you could get paper tape for it anyway.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    11. Re:Pi does it all by dwywit · · Score: 2

      I'll reserve my applause for the person/s who manage to emulate OS400/IBM i on RPi or x86/64.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    12. Re:Pi does it all by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't get it though. We've had the SimhH simulator for about 25 years now, just putting it on a Raspberry Pi is trivial, so the only "story" here is the front panel. Ie, copy source code onto the RPi, run make, and you're done, because the Raspberry Pi is a relatively high powered computer. You can find PDP 11 like computers built by hand - that is, the logic built by hand from TTL gates or relays, those are certainly much more interesting stories. Follow the homebrew cpu ring.

      Granted, this is fun to play with, I've had fun bootstrapping onto SimH from 1977 tape images. But is this really a slashdot story?

    13. Re:Pi does it all by rnturn · · Score: 1

      An IBM mainframe emulator on a Pi would be really impressive . . .

      Pi/CMS? That would be pretty cool to see pulled off.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    14. Re:Pi does it all by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      The Hercules emulator will emulate an IBM z system on your PC. Now, any IBM mainframe software that's not decades old is copyright and basically impossible for an ordinary Joe to get for an emulator. But in the 60s and 70s, IBM released much of their system software free, figuring to make money on the hardware. You can get an MVS turnkey system for Hercules built with the last free version of MVS (3.8j). You get an assembler (G--H and HLASM were licensed program products) and TSO (not ISPF or SDSF, though. You do get a homebrew replacement which seems to be markedly inferior). No CICS or DB2. You don't get PL/I, FORTRAN or COBOL, but you can install old versions of these (no Checkout or Optimizing compiler for PL/I, but PL/I-F was free and you can find install tape images). I've got it installed on my Linux laptop, and it was a blast seeing the operator console come up in the x3270 session (I was an MVS operator for many years).

    15. Re:Pi does it all by countach · · Score: 1

      Whether it's more interesting depends on your area of interest.

    16. Re:Pi does it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a little bit of thought and effort you would have discovered how incorrect and blinkered your useless comment is.

    17. Re: Pi does it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. It always irks me when the pi float by /. And it's just and years-old emulator copypasta'd

    18. Re: Pi does it all by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Do you want OS/400 or CL & RPG?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    19. Re: Pi does it all by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Well, OS400 and CL. I like the way OS400 manages resources - the subsystems, memory pools, routing classes, etc.

      I also like the ability to compile CL.

      But I'll take RPG if I have to ;-)

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    20. Re: Pi does it all by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      ToolSet, Java, and C are all available in the OS/400 constellation. COBOL for the brave. The Java implementation has a robust GUI toolkit, but mostly intended to support terminals, though it will leverage your Windows machines well, and there are mobile and Web toolkits available, which my brother has used to offer a strong anywhere/anytime support structure for real-time global manufacturing support for a DOD contractor/manufacturer who also supports virtually all the aircraft industry in civilian efforts. Mind you, he hates Java, but RPG finally met its match with Web apps.

      He's also told me that there are Python, Pascal, Perl, Smalltalk, COBOL, SQL, BASIC, even PHP packages available. Not that he loves SQL, but he uses it in front of the DB2 sometimes to simplify using Web apps.

      So far as I know he's never admitted to having worked with BASIC. Go figure.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    21. Re: Pi does it all by dwywit · · Score: 1

      One of my early jobs was porting accounting programs written in System/36 BASIC to the AS/400. That brings back some eye-twitching memories.

      BASIC on the /36 was interpreted IIRC. Then it was introduced to the two-level microcode world of the AS/400, and to their credit, IBM's emulated /36 mode on the AS/400 made it all work smoothly.

      Sometimes IBM gets it right

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    22. Re: Pi does it all by dwywit · · Score: 1

      These days I can scratch my AS/400 itch at pub400.com

      It's back online after some users abused the T&Cs.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    23. Re: Pi does it all by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The S/32 was based on the S/3, and ran S/3 code unmodified, right through the S/38. AS/400 ran S/38 emulated, and I think had a dedicated S/36 emulation, as many users didn't want to leave S/36, a really good version of the hardware and software. Of course AS/400 changed a lot and was worth adopting native, and I think I-Series took you as far as you could go with Application Systems, even supporting Linux. I know my brother still has lots of RPG code running, just behind Java UI and mobile shells.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    24. Re: Pi does it all by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. A prev job had an old 400 and I really enjoyed working on it and would enjoy playing on one again. Pity some people thought they could make a quick buck off it.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  2. Excellent Hack by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

    Party On Dudes like it's 1979

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Excellent Hack by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      What would I want to party on a dude as though it were 1979?

    2. Re:Excellent Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would I want to party on a dude as though it were 1979?

      Lots of cocaine and herpes, but no AIDS.

      Party on!

  3. That's not "rebuilding". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    That's putting a fancy front on an emulator. If you're rebuilding, you better get down there and wrap some wires, tinkerer.

    Honestly, it's a cool thing. But it's not rebuilding. It's emulating.

    1. Re: That's not "rebuilding". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Score 1 for pedantry.

      Would anyone have difficulty making this distinction, or are you just going for the satisfaction of pointing something out?

    2. Re:That's not "rebuilding". by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'd be much more impressed to see this running from an FPGA and interfacing with Massbus peripherals.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:That's not "rebuilding". by bitMonster · · Score: 2

      He rebuilt the front panel and switches from photographs, primarily. This is a serious effort.

    4. Re:That's not "rebuilding". by bitMonster · · Score: 2

      http://obsolescenceguaranteed....

      Not a tinkerer.

    5. Re: That's not "rebuilding". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hate language, don't you.

    6. Re:That's not "rebuilding". by rnturn · · Score: 1

      I'd be impressed to find Massbus peripherals that were still operable.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    7. Re: That's not "rebuilding". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I just hate pedants and their penchant for wasting everyone's time.

  4. ed is the standard text editor! by Entrope · · Score: 3, Funny

    ed. Not vi, ed.

    Now get off my lawn, I'm growing belt onions right there.

    1. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Well I just use cat. I am lazy

      --
      http://saveie6.com/
    2. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by renerobinson · · Score: 1

      ED was first, line editing only, then we had EDT (1978?). I remember seeing that for the first time and having my mind blown away...

      --
      been there, done that, got the T-shirt, burned it, going back home
    3. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Cat was around even earlier. Bahoo you younglings. I do not need features and use pipe when cat displays too much info in a terminal

      --
      http://saveie6.com/
    4. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by jfdavis668 · · Score: 0

      Real programmers use emacs. Or butterflies...https://xkcd.com/378/

    5. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think ned from Rand was out before edt. I recall it being banned from the EE dept 11/70 machine because 4 people running ned could bring the system to its knees. Takes me back.

    6. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Software text editors are for wannabe hipsters.

      Serious developers use the switches and LEDs that are right there on the front panel. Why would you pay for all that hardware if you didn't intend to use it?

    7. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      For those who missed the joke: ed is the standard text editor.

    8. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      And thanks to this project? NOW YOU CAN!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    9. Re:ed is the standard text editor! by foistboinder · · Score: 1

      ed - for when you're using a teletype terminal.

      --
      Yet Another Web Site
  5. Looks good, but... Sound? by lenski · · Score: 2

    The builder set up a prototyping area, and my thought would be to install an audio amp and speakers to replicate the 12 (? it's been 40 years for me...) fans it needed for cooling. To say nothing of the RK-05. Of course an organization that could afford a /70 could probably afford the RP06 drives to go with it.

    I remember wishing that someday if I could get really rich, I could someday have an 11/45.

    ..This comment was typed on a 2016-vintage Intel NUC with 16 gig RAM, 1 TB NVMe SSD and a 40-inch 4k monitor. Total "investment": $1500, having splurged on the entirely unnecessary NVMe... Nothing fancy but so many orders of magnitude more powerful than the 11/70 that the systems are incomparable.

    1. Re:Looks good, but... Sound? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      The really tricky part is getting the Pi to emulate the thermal output of the original. I had a friend who had an old 11/70 set up in his bedroom. He only powered it up during winter, when he wanted the extra heat in any case. :)

    2. Re:Looks good, but... Sound? by rnturn · · Score: 1

      He must have had some excellent earplugs to block out the noise of an 11/70. We had one that had been stripped down to the bare essentials--no memory enclosures; Setasi static RAM board in the CPU backplane instead; no removable pack drives; Dilog controller running Fujitsu 5.25in SCSI disks--and even then I really couldn't stand to be in the same room as that beast for more than a few minutes. I can't imagine anyone being able to sleep in the same room as one.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re:Looks good, but... Sound? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Also? Three-phase power.
      We had a beast in a friends garage, in the early 90's. He needed to convince his wife to have the new run from the panel mains.

      That was that last time I touched one of these, with a crappy Wyse 50 terminal, instead of the Honeywell Teleypes or Lear Seigler ADM-3 terminals we had in the labs, where I first used Unix and Berkeley extensions.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:Looks good, but... Sound? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      He didn't sleep with it running--that would be silly and pointless. (There are far more efficient ways to generate heat.) He just didn't power it up when the heat would have been intolerable--so, only during winter.

      It was definitely loud, but I certainly didn't think it was unbearable. At least, not when you were awake and playing with it.

      (His also hadn't been stripped down, so the outer casing may have helped reduce the noise--I'm really not sure. It's the only one I've ever been in the same room with.)

      Not sure about the power, but he owned his own house and was unmarried, so it wouldn't have been a big issue.

  6. Loved my PDP 11/70s by renerobinson · · Score: 2

    I miss those days, cut my baby teeth on a PDP 11/70 with RSX11M+ OS. Did Fortran 66, Fortran 77, Assembler and C code on them.
    We also had 11/34s and a really small one in the lab with a low serial number. It came with the pizza box drives and paper-tape reader/writers.

    --
    been there, done that, got the T-shirt, burned it, going back home
    1. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me rephrase that:
       
        The 80s called and said to stop it. Assembler and compiler code? Lemme guess you ran the fax machine. And yeah, your 80s, Obi-wan

    2. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      At my first programming job, when people complained at how old certain computers were, my team lead would pull out one he did. It was a program he built by hard wiring a circuit card with jumper wires.

    3. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      Was his name Mel?

    4. Re: Loved my PDP 11/70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my first day at work at Microsoft in 1980 was to correct the buffer overflow in login.c. At the time the PDP11 had but a few terminals and no modems for dialup. It would become Kermit before we got a second PDP11. Of course after that XENIX ran on SUN 68ks.

    5. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by digitig · · Score: 1

      PDP 11/70? Eee, tha' were lucky. I cut my computer teeth on the PDP 8/E. I also did the maintenance course on it, which with my electronics degree meant I could follow a high-level instruction (in FOCAL) all the way down to the movement of electrons in specific gates. Am I of the last generation for whom such an end-to-end view of computing was reasonably commonplace?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    6. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by lenski · · Score: 1

      Luxury... PDP-8/L, paper tape only and no disk. (Well, several months later, we got an RK05. 2.3 million words... It was huge and lightning fast.)

      I still remember the wonderment upon first learning of the -11 and its stack. Reentrant code!

      I still have the first programmed output of the decaying sine from the FOCAL example, glued to the inside cover of my CRC math tables book. It's a bit faded but still visible.

    7. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Oh lord... not one of those IBM plugboards. My Dad used those back in the '60s.

      Pictures here.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    8. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      In 79-82, we had the cake-lid drives, that resembled a top-load washer. I have no idea of the sizes, I'm guessing they were 20 MB? Different disc-pacs for our use, and that on the weekends, when the school district did processing.

      We kept our personal files on 8" floppy disks, with a drive accessible in the common area of the lab, away from where the DEC and large peripherals were locked.

      There are several stories from this school. One is that the exchange student we had, Marcus Hess, went on to Cuckoo's Egg fame...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    9. Re:Loved my PDP 11/70s by putriayu · · Score: 1

      yes i like

      --
      jalan jakarta
  7. First things first: Where is your lawn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me get on that turf first, so you can holler at meddling kids all you want!

    Put that in your Raspberry Pi and smoke it, gramps!

  8. WOT warns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Web of Trust does not like that site at all.

  9. MIssing a part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I learned to program on an 8/I back in the seventies, and it seems to me there was a huge metal refrigerator sized box that seems to be missing from this one...

    1. Re:MIssing a part... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      The big boxes were racks that also held tape drives and rack-mounted disk pacs. Sometimes these were plopped into washer-machine height carriages.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  10. Memories by RhettLivingston · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The highlight of my Digital Electronics II Lab course in college was to design and prototype a PDP5 using 74xx series logic chips on breadboards. In comparison, the PDP 11/70 was an advanced supercomputer, but the task of designing even the simplest computer at the gate level really created an appreciation for the complexity of processors. It took 20 breadboards to prototype and worked for just a few minutes before a chip lost its smoke somewhere. Fun days!

    1. Re:Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >but the task of designing even the simplest computer at the gate level really created

      Based on what I'm seeing with college graduates lack of low level hardware knowledge, I can only conclude that courses such as this one are no longer taught.

      Such courses as well as assembly language, which was excellent on the PDP, made it clear that what you are doing is wrangling electrons.

  11. I actually use ed fairly often. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can get in and change a single line in a couple of seconds. Plus in scripts with a here file.
    Hard to believe it has to be installed on so many newer distributions.

    1. Re:I actually use ed fairly often. by rnturn · · Score: 1

      My `emergency' floppy always had a copy of 'edlin' on it; didn't eat up too much of your 360KB disk space but, if memory serves, it only handled files under 64KB. I always found it hilarious when people would delete edlin in order to save valuable hard disk space and then not have anything to edit a screwed up autoexec.bat. For big jobs, there was Logitech's 'point' editor that shipped with their mice. Would edit pretty much anything that could fit in memory. I managed to return many a corrupted WordPerfect document to a usable state using that editor after someone boogered them up---usually after trying to pull in a graphic that was too large.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:I actually use ed fairly often. by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I think in the late '80s it only handled 4k. There was another editor that handled larger files, I don't recall the name.

      At that time I was the network administrator for a state gov't agency, and I once got a help desk call from a fellow IT worker who said her computer wouldn't boot. I asked what was the last thing she did: she needed to make a configuration change, so she edited command.com.

      I knew that couldn't be right. I grabbed my boot and utility floppies, went to her office, and sure enough, her computer wouldn't boot. Booted it off my master floppy, did a DIR C:\, and there was a Command.com sized 4096 bytes and a Command.bak that was 65k. She'd opened it in edlin, saw all the hex code, and exited instead of quitting. It wrote the memory back to the 4k mark and that was it. I guess she meant to edit config.sys or autoexec.bat, I don't remember. Copied a fresh copy of command.com to the computer rather than use the one there, deleted the .bak, and all was well.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  12. Have to build it before putting it on by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This article is not about the emulator. That's been around for a while.

    This is about reproducing the physical hardware - the switches and lights and all that. You say "that's not rebuilding. That's putting a fancy front on" - you realize one has to design and build the "fancy front" before putting it on, right?

    1. Re:Have to build it before putting it on by rnturn · · Score: 2

      That was still rather impressive. But... I was hoping to find that the project entailed interfacing an actual 11/70 front panel to a Raspberry Pi. Because--yep, you see guessed it--I have an 11/70 front panel and I've wanted to do something like that for ages. What I guess I need to find is a source of the 11/70 maintenance prints--should be a piece of cake, right?--for all the pinouts of the connectors on the front panel. Then... the real fun begins.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:Have to build it before putting it on by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Because--yep, you see guessed it--I have an 11/70 front panel and I've wanted to do something like that for ages.

      Good luck with the project, however you will still need to reduce the CPU power of the Raspberry PI to make it authentic.

      Have a nice day :)

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:Have to build it before putting it on by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was hoping to find that the project entailed interfacing an actual 11/70 front panel to a Raspberry Pi. Because--yep, you see guessed it--I have an 11/70 front panel and I've wanted to do something like that for ages.

      There's a similar project that does just this. This is the Blinkenbone project, "historic Blinkenlight console panels controlled by simulators".

      The creator references and links all of this on his obsolescence.wixsite.com page. He explicitly states that this is a scale recreation of the PDP-11/70 panel, and uses Blinkenbone simulator logic for the RPi to drive his kits. This is preferable than having it drive the on-screen java clients, and more accessible than locating a real discarded, vintage panel.

      On eBay, I see panel switches for the PDP-11/70 listed for 75-100 USD each, so unless like YOU, you're blessed with a salvage find, this is super cool.

      Because you have a real salvage panel, this is what you want, the Blinkenbone panel, on the retrocmp site:
      http://retrocmp.com/projects/b...
      http://retrocmp.com/projects/b...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:Have to build it before putting it on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there are schematics for the 11/70 on Art Kossows Bitsavers.org, if not, a quick note to classccmp list would get you the help of several people.

      I myself stuck as rasperry pi running simh inside a VT100 and ran several different PDP OS's, all displayed on the VT.

      Not to pick nits, but the 11/70 was probably the top end of the Unibus series of PDP's, the Qbus series, starting with the 11/23+, included the /73 /83 and /93 series and even were produced by maufactured outside of DEC when the discontinued the PDP11 line. You could even use one of the more modern qbus processor boards with a unibus machine with a qbus/unibus inverter.

  13. Name that OS by bpechter · · Score: 1

    fun game: Name DEC pdp11 OS by running idle light pattern...
    RT11, RSTS/E, RSX11 all had different light patterns.

    1. Re:Name that OS by guygo · · Score: 1

      I remember that. I was in charge of an early cluster consisting of an 11/34, and 11/44, and an 11/70. The 44 had RSTS for a while, but we eventually went over to RSX-11M like the other 2. Teco anybody? DECNet? Hard drives the size of washing machines?

    2. Re:Name that OS by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the others, but on RSX you could substitute in your own light pattern. Simple matter of programming.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re:Name that OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RSTS/E light pattern was established at build time - if you wanted to change the light pattern,
      you basically had to re-install RSTS/E from scratch, and that took hours. I think there were
      3 or 4 available: rotating left, rotating right, and one that started with bits 7 and 8 and then
      swam both left (down to 9) and right (up to 15).

      And, you forgot IAS, which was a derivative/descendant of RSX-11/D.

      ("RSX11" actually had two major variants, "D" for larger, batch-oriented systems, and "M"
      for multi-user environments. However, IAS was supposed to become the one to use for
      large systems with gazillions of terminals, but it never really took off, and its market basically
      dried up once the VAX-11/780 and VAX/VMS started gaining traction)

  14. NOT that!!!! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Oh God, please not the PDP--11/70 series!!!! (I forget, was that the one you had to boot up with paper tape????) Now, the older Perkin/Elmer super-minis were sweet!

    1. Re:NOT that!!!! by rnturn · · Score: 1

      You could but I never encountered one that required booting from paper tape. We had one that, for some reason, came with what I was told by a DEC field service tech was a complete set of the XXDP+ diagnostics on paper tape. Not sure who made the original purchase but they forgot to include the paper tape reader.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:NOT that!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      We booted from disc, in 79. You needed to toggle boot register on the front of the panel, tho. So not much different than tape. Students rarely got to do this, tho' I got some privileges for the locked room with this stuff and had the 3-ring runbook, to do this some mornings.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  15. Next we'll upgrade it to a VAX by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    To get the full 32-bit experience

    1. Re:Next we'll upgrade it to a VAX by ka9dgx · · Score: 1

      I was always in awe of the POLYD instruction - "Evaluate Polynomial, Double Precision"

    2. Re:Next we'll upgrade it to a VAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But limited to 32 coefficients. The other funny instruction was EDITPC (Edit packed to characters), took pages of documentation.
      Anyway the most evil instruction is probably iret on x86 (takes pages of documentation, any mistake can become a security hole).

  16. Unix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first Unix was developed on a PDP7 in 1969 by Ken Thompson at Bell Labs. Not a PDP 11.

    1. Re:Unix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but to pick nits, it doesn't say *first* developed on a PDP-11...

      Besides, the PDP7 version was not yet the UNIX we know and love. It was written in assembly, not C, and it was single-user.

  17. Histerical perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used a PDP 11-70 in 1981 to run BASIC. Can you still run BASIC?

    1. Re:Histerical perspective by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you run RSTS/E or Unix first, then load the BASIC interpreter. It's line-number stuff!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  18. The person reproducing it might like to hear from by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That's very cool that you have that.

    If you want to interface it with an RPi, I bet the guy doing the project in the article might like to here from you.

  19. "Digital" topic used correctly for a change! by infernow · · Score: 1

    I'm pleasantly surprised they tagged this correctly. Of course, the Digital Equipment Corporation hadn't exactly been lighting up the news, since they've been toast for nearly 20 years :-) Kudos for remembering them!

    --

    that that is is that that is not is not

  20. Do some mining. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Put an Antminer in the case for authenticity.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  21. possible an 11/05 by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

    Was that "really small one" a PDP-11/05?

  22. You had paper tape? We booted from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You had paper tape? You complain of this? We booted from toggle switches you insensitive clod.