Slashdot Mirror


California Begins Trial Rollout of Digital License Plates (caranddriver.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Car and Driver: California is taking its first steps toward America's first digital license plate. Using display technology akin to the e-ink used in the Amazon Kindle, a Foster City, California, outfit called Reviver Auto has come up with a digital plate that is now available on a limited basis in California, with the first fleet trial taking place on a fleet of 24 City of Sacramento -- owned Chevrolet Volt cars wearing plates supplied at no cost by Reviver. The new monochrome units -- which were also just rolled out in Dubai -- comply with reflectivity standards and are GPS enabled, allowing owners to track a stolen vehicle or at least its plate.

Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless lifestyle will appreciate that, thanks to the Reviver's Rplate Pro, registration can be paid via the internet, assuring that one never has to make a last-minute trip to the DMV's no-appointment Hell Line. It should also be a boon to companies with large fleets. What's more, it's easy to upgrade to a special-interest plate if one chooses to do so.

192 comments

  1. Wow by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "GPS enabled"

    Guess we don't have to worry much about license plate readers if folks are willing to have a(nother)* GPS attached to them at all times.
    Do folks really not think about the alternate applications of such gadgetry before they welcome them with open arms ?

    *Smartphone attached to your hip being the other one.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's ok, there's already a GPS in your car. Also a tap on your phone.

    2. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can see where this is going:

      Police will want to remotely change the plates on stolen cars to STOLEN.

      Hackers will get in and do that to people like they do swatting now.

    3. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change all the police cars to say STOLEN? Or "TERRORIST" or something, and have a bunch of yahoos swat the police?

    4. Re:Wow by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Nations have been doing this with toll road electronic toll collection systems. Police have tracked a lot of criminals movements like that.
      The tracking part is now just part of the product.
      The Overton window https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... has moved to full 1984 in CA.
      Police, city, state and federal task forces now have the digital freedom to track every US citizen in CA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Wow by sickre · · Score: 0, Troll

      With electric vehicles, gas taxes won't be enough to pay for roads. We will need to tax road users based on where and when they are driving. The good news is that we can move efficiently tackle congestion by encouraging drivers to drive outside of peak hours and locations, and so level demand.

    6. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the heck would it need to actually *display* the license number? It is readable remotely and trackable in all ways. The only two possible uses that come to mind are: 1. New ad platform 2. A useless feature to mask the intended real purpose: real time tracking of vehicles.

    7. Re:Wow by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between one under control of a private company and one under control of the state. It's not much of a warrant veil, but it's something.

    8. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Car hits ped
      Witness wants to report it
      Needs to see plate number

    9. Re: Wow by Alypius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see it as more as distributed mining; GPS will give speed data and automatically issue speeding tickets (or failure to stop) "for your convenience."

    10. Re: Wow by joe_frisch · · Score: 3

      Or "Child Kidnapper"

      The number of ways this can go wrong is nearly endless. But I expect that people will find themselves using them anyway as the system makes them more convenient than the alternative. People will tell themselves that they don't have any privacy anyway, and that hacks are rare and only happen to other people.

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "fair" road taxes for electric vs petrol vehicles in states with annual inspections can be calculated based on odometer readings at the time of the emissions/safety inspection or an ownership transfer.

      absolutely no gps or tracking required. testing centers already exist. inspections are already performed. this would cost NOTHING to implement, and would take nothing more than a couple new database fields in the state's vehicle registration database and another line item on the registration notices.

      if a state doesn't do annual inspections for safety and emissions.. *THEY SHOULD*.. emissions, tire wear, glass, seat belts, mirrors, lights, pending recalls, etc. are all quick things to check and often contribute to accidents or increased injury severity in one when faulty or otherwise non-functional.

    12. Re: Wow by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      Look, the government already licenses you the carâ"that's why it's called a license plate. They know where you live, and I doubt it would be illegal for them (or a private citizen) to follow you around in a car with a normal license plate if they really wanted to.

      It's not that you donâ(TM)t have a right to privacy, it's that driving my around is already a thing you do in public with the government's permission. As a matter of public safety while you exercise your driving privileges, they're going to check up on you. They already do. If it's not a price you're willing to pay, take cabs or buses or ride a bike. Owning a car comes with responsibilities and burdens.

    13. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric vehicles can easily pay their fair share of the road taxes by simply including an energy monitor in the motor controller. Every few months they can go by an emission control station and settle up. They can pay the tax that would apply to the equivalent amount of gasoline for the energy they used. That will also solve the problem of keeping the emission control techs employed.

    14. Re: Wow by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      "Kick me"

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:Wow by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The Overton window https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] has moved to full 1984 in CA.
      Police, city, state and federal task forces now have the digital freedom to track every US citizen in CA.

      California has the best privacy protection laws in the United States, by far.

      https://www.comparitech.com/bl...

      https://www.wired.com/2015/10/...

      The only vehicles with these new plates are state-owned vehicles. Also, there are strict limits with what law enforcement is allowed to do in California with information taken from license plate readers. The data must be destroyed in 60 days. In Texas, there are absolutely no restrictions on the use of license plate readers.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea. The private company will resell all info to all interested states and companies. Huge difference!

    17. Re:Wow by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      But as with any technology, this can and will be hacked...
      Like the revolving number plates james bond had, but more flexible.
      Have the GPS report a false location, have the license plate blank out or display a false number in the presence of traffic cameras or when speeding, but display a legit plate number when driving at the speed limit.

      Not sure how this would help with online vehicle registration, do you actually have to go and buy physical plates? In most countries the plate is just an identifier which remains with the vehicle and the licensing is handled separately.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    18. Re:Wow by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Most people would love to drive outside of peak hours if given the chance, but most of those people are forced by their employers to drive during peak hours. Taxing them more during peak hours will just be further punishment and won't do anything to ease congestion.
      If you tackle the reason why people travel at peak times, then you will make a difference to congestion.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    19. Re: Wow by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      A55 RGY for everyone!

    20. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or


      U tot U `FLT . LUXES on LUXES . GLOTTAL `BITTEN .
      HA on U . U . U tot U `U tot U `U us are U tot U `
      U U . U . U . U us are U us are U us are U tot U `
      U `U `U . U . U `MEGA `U `MEGA `LUXES on BITTEN .
      U . U U . U . U tot U `U tot U `U us are U . U on
      U on HA . U . U tot U `U tot U `U us are U on U .
      U tot U `FLT . LUXES on LUXES . GLOTTAL `U tot U `


      Even cops can usually spot those, though.

    21. Re: Wow by markdavis · · Score: 2

      There is a huge difference between everything you just listed and having 100% mandated monitoring of where every vehicle is all the time.

      Where you go ON FOOT is public information when you are outdoors, off your property. Do you think it would be OK to require everyone to wear a GPS bracelet whenever off his/her own property?

      What you say is public information when you are outdoors, presumably off your property. Do you think it would be OK to require everyone to wear microphones on their clothes to transmit what they say whenever on public property?

      I could go on, but I think I have made my point. And it doesn't matter how many "protection" laws we create, they will be broken when it is convenient for mainstream government, ignored by the 3-letter agencies from the start, bused by non-government entities, hacked by criminals, and act as a gateway for more and more intrusiveness as people "get used to it".

    22. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxing all road users is not really fair. The majority of damage is caused by extremely heavy trucks hauling things. There should be laws enacted to limit the weight if those trucks. Make them out of carbon fiber and aluminum.

      Though this won't much help states like Michigan, where the ground is a freezing/thawing swamp. There, roads self destruct. We need better road materials for them.

    23. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I am against all forms of licensing. It is none of the witnes's business and a violation of my 5th ammendment rights.
      --
      cayenne8

    24. Re:Wow by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Also, there are strict limits with what law enforcement is allowed to do in California with information taken from license plate readers. The data must be destroyed in 60 days. In Texas, there are absolutely no restrictions on the use of license plate readers.

      How dare you stomp on people's narrative?

      As for this "tracking" so many Slashdotters are having a hissyfit about, it can be a rough analogy to a DNA test. Me leaving my tracks all over the place - credit card purchases, fuel purchases leaving CC numbers as well as their security cams will provide me with a fine electronic alibi in the event I am ever falsely accused of anything.

      Meanwhile, I would suggest the Slashdot Sensativi all drive 49 chevy Pick-um-ups, wear Dune style stillsuits to ensure they keep their precious bodily fluids and DNA uncollected, and move to a compound in the woods in Idaho as Sovereign Citizens.

      Maybe they can raise chickens to barter with.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    25. Re: Wow by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      I could go on, but I think I have made my point.

      Yup, you've proven that you are Dale Gribble.

      Have you become a Sovereign Citizen yet?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re:Wow by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      "GPS enabled"

      Guess we don't have to worry much about license plate readers if folks are willing to have a(nother)* GPS attached to them at all times. Do folks really not think about the alternate applications of such gadgetry before they welcome them with open arms ?

      *Smartphone attached to your hip being the other one.

      There are promising not to track employees in the test fleet cars. I'm sure they will continue to not use the tracking features. Wanna buy a bridge?

      $700 for the tag, $7/month for the privilege of providing you location data and no doubt a letter warning you to replace the tag if you manage to disable the GPS. The only up side is Jobs would not be able to run without a tag since the dealer could install and activate it before the car rolls out the door...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    27. Re:Wow by houghi · · Score: 1

      Is that why I get "Sorry, this content is not available in your region" or are they just unwilling to get rid of their data mining on the website? (I an in Europe)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    28. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While laudable, assuming a law will result in the government following it, isn't going to help.

      Governments ignore their own laws all of the time, even in democratic nations. Even laws as simple as access-to-information acts, are rife with non-compliance.

      And all it takes is the CIA/NSA/FBI hacking into the DMV or whatever else is being used to record location/plate information, and one can delete in 60 days -- but a copy still exists elsewhere.

      Even better, is anonymized data being sold -- which we all know can easily be re-linked via various means.

      Tech like this? Shouldn't exist.

    29. Re:Wow by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I've got a Hum box that tracks my car and some people have Onstar and equivalent.

      We buy that with reason.

      Also, look at Find My iPhone or Google Device.

      I don't care if LEO or advertisers know where my car or phone is, but I sure as hell care that I know where that stuff is.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    30. Re:Wow by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

      I'd argue it's worse. Sure a corporation can try to monetize my movements and habits but the state can throw me in jail.

      We already have stop light cameras to automatically issue tickets. Now we can automatically send out traffic tickets for speeders. And, as with the stop light cameras, there is no way for you to prove you weren't the one driving the car so you are automatically guilty. Maybe we will at least see a reduction in the police force, but I doubt it.

    31. Re:Wow by Tunefix · · Score: 1

      Seems like the trend to create a digital "anything" goes forth unhindered.
      Can't wait for the first "digital lumber" to come around.
      Yes, is costs 5 times as much, but just think of the amount of surveillance it gets you!
      Err, - I mean - now your house can tell you if it need a new coat of paint, or if there is a termite attack.
      Directly to your toaster who burns the information into your breakfast.

    32. Re:Wow by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

      California has the best anti-coorpprivacy protection laws in the United States.

      The state government spying for documented citizens is another matter, entirely.

      There is no pro-privacy reason a digital license plate needs to have GPS built in.

    33. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt! Wrong. It actually is illegal for police at least to follow you around waiting for you to commit an infraction.

    34. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In California at least there is a sticker you need to put on the plate every year that shows the year of expiration of the license. There is another sticker that shows the month but of course you don't generally change that one. So each year you pay online or mail in your payment and they send you a sticker along with paperwork to go in your car. What they are talking about is people who have had their mail stolen (becoming really common in some areas) or forgot to pay on time and were then forced to go to the DMV office and stand in a hellacious line to pay at the last minute and get their sticker. Since they say you don't do that anymore it must have more than just GPS. It must also request and display licensing status from the DMV periodically too. I imagine all this means it needs to connect to your car's wiring harness for power. If it was just the e-Ink it could probably just be a self contained unit. But with GPS and all the other communications it must be doing it would need more power. Seems silly. Do this once all cars are required to have V2V and V2I communications built in. Yes, Trump nixed that requirement so it will be a while. But at least then the infrastructure in vehicle would be there and you wouldn't need extra radios in a damn license plate.

    35. Re:Wow by Rhipf · · Score: 1

      To be fair we already have automatic traffic ticket. There are speed cameras that can be set up anywhere and record the license plate of speeding vehicles then issue the ticket to the owner.
      As far as stop light cameras go, it is rather easy to tell if you are the one driving the vehicle since the camera takes a picture of the driver.

    36. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are going to post from a smart phone, please turn off "smart punctuation" in the keyboard settings. Jerk.

    37. Re:Wow by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      That would be a difference. In Texas they don't for privacy reasons. (Could be awkward for the wife to see a picture with you and someone else in a car when opening the mail.)

    38. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? the car that hit the ped already reported the accident and self-drove itself to the nearest police station with driver locked inside.

    39. Re:Wow by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      There should be some sort of middle ground between your narrative and complete state surveillance.

    40. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxing all road users is not really fair. The majority of damage is caused by extremely heavy trucks hauling things.

      At some point, you're going to discover why weigh stations exist.

    41. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just took companies a decade of lobbying and bribes (not that there is really any difference between the two) to get California to finally approve these. They tried to trial them in San Francisco back around '05-'07. What the summary also failed to point out is they want to use the "digital" plates to display ads, one of the company founders even went on TV to tell reporters that he had the "genius" idea when he realized people are always stuck in traffic staring at the back of the car in front of them and wanted to provide a way for advertisers to take advantage of that, being able to display unavoidable ads to people.

    42. Re:Wow by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      There should be some sort of middle ground between your narrative and complete state surveillance.

      I merely write what I do to illustrate the futility of the concept. of staying off the radar screens as it were. If a person's life needs to be 24/7 "i've got a secret" for 70 some years, they were born in the wrong millennium. they also might be fascinated in how little freedom they would have had in that surveillance free day and age.

      People need to get the difference between a digital license plate and big brothe's cameras in your house. I know that's a quixotic task at Slashdot, but it does need pointed out.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    43. Re:Wow by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The only vehicles with these new plates are state-owned vehicles.

      You missed the Subject of this story: "... trial rollout ...". That means what they're doing today is intended to expand tomorrow. The fact that it's only state-owned vehicles today is irrelevant. The time to object to this idea is now, not after it becomes mandatory for all vehicles.

      Also, the fact that there are current limits on what law enforcement can do with such data today does not protect us tomorrow. The law can change, and will change the first time something major happens that tracking these plates could help solve. It may not be the kidnapping of your child that creates an Amber-like amendment to data protection on this, but there will be a high-profile one that does.

      Also, the concern is not just that the "GPS enabled" plate can be tracked, but that it must have a connection to the outside world to do that. How long before the first script is released to hack the plates and have them all show "RTZO SUX" on every car in the vicinity, or even the state?

      Oregon keeps floating the idea of "GPS-based gas taxes". I.e., when you go to the pump, your data is downloaded and the tax for the kind of roads you drove on and at what time is added to your gas pump total. Nobody who is a proponent of this idea understands that this means that the government (taxation authority) will be recording every place you drive and when, and will be gathering that data, or they understand and don't care. The ones who do handwave away the privacy issues by claiming that the data will not be kept. And we all know that as soon as an Amber-like event occurs the government will be keeping the data so they can use it as evidence in court.

      Arguing that this is ok because of laws today is ignorant of history and the ability to create new laws.

    44. Re: Wow by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      why? the car that hit the ped already reported the accident and self-drove itself to the nearest police station with driver locked inside.

      The car identified that there was something in the road six seconds before running it down. It didn't know it was a person, and it didn't care that it was a large obstacle in the road, either. Why would it drive to a police station? It was just defending itself against a road-intruder.

    45. Re:Wow by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You missed the Subject of this story: "... trial rollout ...". That means what they're doing today is intended to expand tomorrow. The fact that it's only state-owned vehicles today is irrelevant. The time to object to this idea is now, not after it becomes mandatory for all vehicles.

      It depends. If the idea is to eventually have all state-owned vehicles with digital license plates with built-in GPS , then I'm all for it. If the idea is to have all vehicles in private hands with digital license plates with built-in GPS then I'm against it.

      Fortunately, California is a state that has led the nation in privacy protection laws. My main reason for pointing this out is that I was initially responding to a comment of "OMFG! CALIFORNIA IS 1984 NOW AND THEY'RE ALL DOOOMED!"

      The rest of the country seems obsessed with what California does. We're fine, thank you, now please leave us alone.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    46. Re:Wow by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Most people would love to drive outside of peak hours if given the chance, but most of those people are forced by their employers to drive during peak hours.

      Most people do not drive for a living or need to be on the roads at any specific time. Some people work for delivery companies (UPS, FedEx, etc) that require delivery drivers to be on the road during working hours. Most people work for employers who want them at work BY a specific time and to leave AFTER another specific time.

      The fact that you drive to work so that the difference between your arrival and "be here by" is minimized, or you leave as soon as you can, is YOUR fault, not the employer's. The employer is not forcing you to drive during peak hours.

      Taxing them more during peak hours will just be further punishment and won't do anything to ease congestion.

      It will impact a lot of the casual traffic (shopping trips, etc.) and may increase car-pooling, or time-shifting for those who can work flexible hours. It may even get more employers to offer flexible hours if their employees have an economic interest in driving in off-peak times. It will help with congestion since it can reduce the traffic levels to below that threshold.

      It is a lot more productive discussion for an employee to say to the boss "I am willing to work from 6AM to 3PM to avoid peak travel taxation, if that's ok with you", than for some generic "we'd like flexible hours just because" request.

    47. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we will at least see a reduction in the police force, but I doubt it.

      What?!? Have driven anywhere lately? Nothing but speeders, people looking at their phone, road ragers, etc, and nary a cop or HP to be seen. If anything our roads and freeways need more police.

    48. Re:Wow by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It depends. If the idea is to eventually have all state-owned vehicles with digital license plates

      Read the summary, at least. It talks about owners avoiding lines at DMV, etc. That means everyone, not just state fleets.

      Fortunately, California is a state that has led the nation in privacy protection laws.

      It's good to rely on the fact that laws never change.

    49. Re:Wow by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It's good to rely on the fact that laws never change.

      It's good to rely on a government that does what we tell it to do, using our vote and public forms.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    50. Re:Wow by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You have just demonstrated "sarcasm" in response to sarcasm. It would be good to be able to rely on that. It's a shame we cannot. Especially when "think of the children".

    51. Re:Wow by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You have just demonstrated "sarcasm" in response to sarcasm.

      I wasn't being sarcastic. The government of California is doing a good job statewide, and the local governments are even better. You'd be surprised how nice things can be when you get rid of all the Republican jackoffs. After Texas, it's absolutely refreshing.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    52. Re:Wow by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Travelling to work several hours early and leaving several hours late is not practical, you end up having no time for yourself and/or no sleep. If your sole purpose in existence is to work then sure, most of us have other things we want to do.

      There is already an economic interest in travel during off-peak times...
      Your time is not free, you burn more fuel if your sitting in slow traffic for a long period of time, peak tickets on trains etc cost more. People already have reasons to work flexible hours, and many will choose a lower salary in exchange for more flexible conditions. Many companies are simply not allowing more flexible conditions, and are forcing people to travel at peak times which causes all the problems.

      And then already congested cities are encouraging the constructions of more office space in the congested areas, further compounding the problem.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    53. Re:Wow by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Travelling to work several hours early and leaving several hours late is not practical,

      I wasn't responding to a claim it was practical, I was responding to the claim that employers force people to drive at peak times.

      There is already an economic interest in travel during off-peak times... Your time is not free,

      Time not being reimbursed by your employer is free to him. Also, it is hard to put a cash value on "your time" (yes, you can claim a price for it, but until someone pays you that rate it's just a claim). It is trivial to demonstrate an actual cash value to off-peak driving if on-peak driving is taxed.

      peak tickets on trains etc cost more.

      You've changed the goalposts. The comment I replied to was for driving, not training.

      Many companies are simply not allowing more flexible conditions,

      Reducing congestion does not require all companies allowing flexible hours, only some of them. I didn't claim they would allow it, I just said it would be an easier sell if someone was specific about his own working hours and why instead of simply asking for "flexible time" for all.

      and are forcing people to travel at peak times which causes all the problems.

      There's that word "forcing" again.

    54. Re:Wow by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I wasn't being sarcastic.

      You didn't realize it, but yes, you were, the same way I did when I said it was nice you could rely on laws not changing. Laws change. Relying on them never changing as an excuse to allow THIS privacy violation or THAT privacy violation to gain a foothold is naive, at best. As soon as there is a "think of the children" event and someone realizes they have all this nice juicy data that could help them find a criminal, laws will change.

      You'd be surprised how nice things can be when you get rid of all the Republican jackoffs.

      It is simply impossible to have a decent conversation with you when you keep resorting to name calling and politics.

    55. Re: Wow by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Change all the police cars to say STOLEN? Or "TERRORIST" or something, and have a bunch of yahoos swat the police?

      OK. I'm starting to see an upside to this.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    56. Re: Wow by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      No. Maybe slashdot should stop being literally the only site on the internet that can't handle it.

  2. Technology looking for a solution? by thogard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too many people in IT think its about the Technology but IT is about the Information.

    The project seems to connect registration with the tag yet most places let you type in a tag number and pay online. That is an expected information flow.

    I also wonder how these will work in accidents. The tag numbers are usually the way of identifying the owners of the cars.

    1. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by SeaFox · · Score: 0

      Just make sure to ram them with both the front and rear of your vehicle, so the E-ink plate is too damaged to display.

    2. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having somebody elses tag on your car would probably prevent you from being pulled over for expired tags, however, if you're pulled over they will run the plates and when they run the plates, they'll see that the tabs aren't legitimate.

      So, the issue of not having the system tied directly to the registration is probably less of an issue than it might seem. I'm sure there's things like wire fraud that would be added for anybody that's unfortunate enough to be caught scamming the system in that manner.

    3. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feature, not a bug. Just ram your car into someone, have a disable switch going to your e-ink display, and make it blank as you speed off down the road. Hah. People long ago would do this with fancy mechanical plate flipping mechanisms. Thanks, idiots. Now it's as easy as running a pair of wires to your plate to make it blank on demand!

    4. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The past would have to have police, a contractor for police, a federal task force attach a tracker. With a battery pack and electronics that would be a larger device. With a risk of discovery long term.
      The other way was to push malware onto a cell phone and expect the car, person and cell phone to always stay together.

      A gps device that stays with the car at all times always allows CA law enforcement to track every US citizen using a car in CA for "reasons".
      Drive near a protest that a government in CA does not like? All cars get entered into a database.
      Do a first amendment audit the CA police and gov do not like the video results of? Investigate all cars in the area at that time.
      Have the same car in an area again and police get a predictive warning about "citizen" journalists driving around in the area.
      Gps just keeps on giving. Protest outside a camp, fort, station, base, contractor and its gps data collection time on all cars.
      Add in DEA, FBI tracking. Get some HIDTA funds to map out every CA gps ready car moving around the USA.
      Returning to the USA? Thats a car worth tracking. Driving near the edge of the USA everyday? Thats going to get tracked.
      Driving past a protest? Thats another car to consider and its gps movements get added to a few CA databases.

      Think of the overtime for the contractors and design work to make the data sets tracking US citizens look nice on a real time CA police gui.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your Subject Line is spot-on thogard. Let's make an more-expensive, easy-to-update electronic version of an inexpensive, hard-to-update metal thing -- that actually never needs to be updated.

      Case in point: I've had the same license plates on my 2001 Honda Civic and 2002 Honda CR-V since, well, 2001 and 2002.

      The additional "features" of easy upgrading and large fleet boon are unconvincing -- how often will one mess with the license plates?

      It should also be a boon to companies with large fleets.
      What's more, it's easy to upgrade to a special-interest plate if one chooses to do so.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having somebody elses tag on your car would probably prevent you from being pulled over for expired tags ...

      Whose plates are you going to put on your car? If you steal them, they will probably be either:
      a) reported stolen
      b) replaced, and the old ones will be marked as inactive
      In either case, getting caught with that is worse than expired plates. They can also quickly spot check the make and model of the car while they roll down the highway (that's part of what they do), and if that doesn't match, you'll also get nabbed.

      That's just a bad idea.

    7. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's a total waste of money and resources.
      Someone involved with this brilliant "invention" is the brother-in-law of the state bureaucrat that decides to replace normal number plates with these.

    8. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Subject Line is spot-on thogard. Let's make an more-expensive, easy-to-update electronic version of an inexpensive, hard-to-update metal thing -- that actually never needs to be updated.
      Case in point: I've had the same license plates on my 2001 Honda Civic and 2002 Honda CR-V since, well, 2001 and 2002.

      You mean you have never put a new yearly registration sticker on your plate for the last 17 years?!?

      Seriously though, they are specifically marketing these to large companies with fleets of trucks or cars.
      400 vehicles could very easily mean you'd be updating a 12th or about 33 registration stickers every month. As the plates get updated remotely and not by the plate holder, its supposed to be all legal so far as registration renewal and payment.

      For you or I with one or two cars, this wouldn't be needed.

      But in the same way a metal plate isn't needed if it will be permanently mounted inside a window and not exposed to the elements, yet metal plates are all they make so that's what you get.
      It may be the same with these things in a decade or two.

    9. Re: Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not all states require a sticker on the plate which needs to be updated. I've had the same plates in New York since before 2008 on multiple cars and I haven't touched them.

    10. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      You don't steal plates from another vehicle, you clone them - then the owner of the other vehicle has no idea it's happened unless you do something that attracts attention like getting issued with a ticket that's sent to their registered address.

      If you're going to do something illegal with a vehicle, you pick an extremely common make and model, and when you clone someone else's plates you find another vehicle which is the same as the one you have.

      It's not difficult, and many criminals are already using these strategies. I know various people who have had their license plates cloned, and then been issued with traffic tickets in locations they've never visited.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    11. Re: Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the plates are GPS-enabled, the police can just look up which cars were present at location and time of the incident.

    12. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by trawg · · Score: 1

      The additional "features" of easy upgrading and large fleet boon are unconvincing -- how often will one mess with the license plates?

      They will probably be messed with all the time, once the vulnerabilities come rolling in. Hey, maybe it will be the first truly secure piece of technology ever!

    13. Re: Technology looking for a solution? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Not all states require a sticker on the plate which needs to be updated. I've had the same plates in New York since before 2008 on multiple cars and I haven't touched them.

      I would guess more states will go that route so they can save the cost of printing and mailing a sticker; especially since it is easy to run a tag and see if it is expired, especially as the tag reading camera systems proliferate. Plates have proven to be a durable solution for a hundred years; I've seen plates over 80 years old on cars. You can bang a trailer or back over something and the bent plate is still readable, how will plates hold up the first time something dents them severely? This definitely appears to be an answer in search of a question.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    14. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could also swap about a dozen cars plates in a parking lot. So now there are 10 people with stolen plates on their car and you could just be one of the innocent victims.

    15. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of 3 states and 3 countries I've lived in, California's car registration / licensing was hands-down the worst: biggest wait times, constant computer outages, dumbest traffic rules and testing policies, rudest employees. But sure, let's fix metal plates, I guess?

    16. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by fgouget · · Score: 1

      You mean you have never put a new yearly registration sticker on your plate for the last 17 years?!?

      Nope. And I didn't even change the license plate when I bought my car. Instead I just filed the paperwork so that the records show the car with this license plate is mine (and any fines go to me (but I didn't get to verify this part yet ;-)). Oh, and in my country registration stickers went out of favor a couple of decades ago. And the stickers that indicate the car is insured and has been inspected for safety are behind the windshield. This also ensures miscreants cannot tamper with them. See? There's a solution to everything!

    17. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by scasagrande · · Score: 1

      I also wonder how these will work in accidents. The tag numbers are usually the way of identifying the owners of the cars.

      A serial number on the back of the plate could survive, even if the display is destroyed.

    18. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by GIL_Dude · · Score: 2

      I actually had my physical plate stolen. This was 4 years ago - so fairly recent - in California. CA is a two plate (one front, one rear) state and they only stole the rear plate. They REPLACED the rear plate with one from the car they stole. I actually only noticed it at first because the orange sticker (that year the expiration date sticker on the plate was orange) had been partially removed. I saw that when approaching the car at my work parking lot. People sometimes steal the sticker to make it look like their license is still current. So I looked closer at the plate expecting to see that someone had tried to steal the sticker. On closer inspection I saw that it wasn't my plate number. I checked the front, and that one was still the correct plate number. I had to call the police and report it AND surrender the plate that wasn't mine to the police and my old front plate to the DMV and get completely new plates and numbers. It turns out the criminals had stolen a car like mine (Toyota Camry at the time) and stole my plate to make it look like they were not in a stolen car (and of course make it look like I WAS in a stolen car). So it does happen.

    19. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a hurry? Spoof the plate of another vehicle, ideally one with the same model and colour as yours. Fly on past those automated speed traps, then change your plate back once you're off the highway.

      Cop/spy and don't want to draw attention to your tail/surveilance? Switch out plates the instant you are out of sight.

      Get cut up in traffic? Clone that guy's plate and run a few red lights!

      Swap plates when you park in the disabled bay! No more tickets!

      This tech has lots of applications; they're just almost all shady as hell.

    20. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a radical idea... How about we just put the serial number on the front of the plate instead. We could even print it in large numbers so it's easy to see from a distance.

    21. Re:Technology looking for a solution? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It's unlikely those cars would all get busted in the same lot unless the drivers noticed. Chances are the drivers wouldn't notice, the cars would disperse and would end up getting stopped one by one over the next few weeks/months. The police would have no idea what caused this, and the criminals who did it would have pulled a prank but not really gained anything.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  3. Can you say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    State mandated tracking device...

    1. Re:Can you say by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Yep -- have to tax by the mile, more during rush hours, more on congested roads, etc.

      Funny, there's already a way to tax mileage on electric cars without being intrusive assholes. Tire tax, combined with annual inspections of tread depth. But California seems to want to track everything that moves.

    2. Re:Can you say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. Just don't leave. Stay in CA please. Thanks.

    3. Re:Can you say by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      No, you can't say that. Because it's not state mandated, in fact it costs $700 + $7 a month so almost no private citizens are going to jump at the opportunity.

      What it is, is a city of Sacramento mandated tracking device for city of Sacramento employees while driving city cars. They expect it to reduce fleet tracking costs. I have no problem with that form of surveillance.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Can you say by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't reading the odometer during inspection be more reliable? Any idiot can buy tires across state lines and pretend they haven't driven at all. It takes a little more work to modify a digital odometer.

  4. Dumb "bonus feature" by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Registrations in California already happen online. That's stupid.

    1. Re:Dumb "bonus feature" by sabbede · · Score: 1

      I'm in Georgia, and in a little while I'll be heading over to https://mvd.dor.ga.gov/tags/ to renew mine. No "digital license plate" needed.

  5. More spyware... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    More fucking spyware. Makes one wish for a massive solar flare...

  6. This content is not available in your region by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Informative

    Congrats car & driver, you only had 2 years to implement GDPR, and it really isn't hard at all unless you are doing pretty screwed up things. I could read the google cache at least in order to discover the utter ridiculousness of $700 license plates with a $7 monthly fee! I guess you pay all that for the privilege of the state tracking you. I wonder who makes these plates, that's some serious state gov connections to get it going even at the pilot level.
    Even without the tracking aspect, digital plates are the worst idea - a fender bender becomes expensive and/or could leave you with a non working plate, plates in general will certainly be harder to read and can potentially stop working, etc etc...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:This content is not available in your region by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I wonder who makes these plates, that's some serious state gov connections to get it going even at the pilot level.

      Well, way back when, license plates used to be made in prisons. Maybe they still are today . . . ?

      Now that would be brilliant if these digital license plates were made by convicted criminals. Folks in prisons used to learn how to crack a safe from other prisoners.

      Now they can learn how to hack a plate

      . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:This content is not available in your region by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The real problem is having license plates at all. You shouldn't, especially if it's going to have GPS. At that point it makes sense to just install a V2V beacon, that would actually have some utility to drivers around you. Pick a standard and let the meter readers nationwide be issued something to read it. In the bargain you can also remove the stupid front license plate requirement that some states (including California) still have.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:This content is not available in your region by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Congrats car & driver, you only had 2 years to implement GDPR

      No I'm sure it would have killed them completely to not harvest your data and throw every tracking cookie under the sun at its users. There website wouldn't work without connections to:
      caranddriver.com
      api-prod.caranddriver.com
      api.backfires.caranddriver.com
      www.caranddriver.com
      crazyegg.com
      script.crazyegg.com
      crwdcntrl.net
      tags.crwdcntrl.net
      d1z2jf7jlzjs58.cloudfront.net
      d2bnxibecyz4h5.cloudfront.net
      ensighten.com
      nexus.ensighten.com
      facebook.com
      graph.facebook.com
      facebook.net
      connect.facebook.net
      google-analytics.com
      www.google-analytics.com
      googletagmanager.com
      www.googletagmanager.com
      googletagservices.com
      www.googletagservices.com
      hearstapps.com
      hips.hearstapps.com
      hs-analytics.net
      js.hs-analytics.net
      hs-scripts.com
      js.hs-scripts.com
      jumpstartmediavault.com
      assets.jumpstartmediavault.com
      nexac.com
      h.nexac.com
      ntv.io
      s.ntv.io
      optimizely.com
      cdn.optimizely.com
      scorecardresearch.com
      sb.scorecardresearch.com

      To say nothing of getting 7 cookies for clicking the link.

      Personally I am thankful that this new wave of blocking schemes causes sites to advertise when they have shitty practices.

  7. GPS huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That explains the entire project, as there is no reason whatsoever to have an e-ink license plate.

    Having a GPS system that the government can use to track your car though... that is something that they have a use for.

    1. Re:GPS huh? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The plate is just an excuse, the plate would work just fine without GPS and most cars already have GPS anyway.
      Having GPS for navigation is a far more compelling reason to put GPS into a car, as it serves an extremely useful purpose for most people unless you never drive to places you're not familiar with.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  8. $699 + $7 per month? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why the blue fuck would someone pay that much money to trade away their privacy and have a plate that's more easily damaged. If they want the GPS tracking that badly (i.e. are cowards), just hide a cheap smartphone with a pre-pay data plan somewhere in the car.

    1. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      I think owners of delivery trucks or rental car fleets would jump on this right away.

    2. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      At $699/car and $7/car/month? How is that cheaper than a minimum wage worker applying stickers?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by niftydude · · Score: 1

      Ah, but a pre-pay phone won't send info directly to the state. I think these idiots are going to like the parking fines that this feature will attract

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    4. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Rental car companies demand even more stripped down models than the manufacturers are willing to offer for direct sales to cut costs. Hard to imagine them swallowing a $700 device to track a car when that is already a pretty saturated field with cheaper devices. Further, given the presumed interest in theft recovery, putting it in the license plate, the first part of a car ditched after being stolen, seems like a poor choice to integrate the tracking facility.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Because you can get conductive transparent films to block the signal and hack it to display someone else's plates while doing illegal shit, why else would politicians want to make them legal?

    6. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by AC-x · · Score: 1

      Why the blue fuck would someone pay that much money to trade away their privacy

      GPS stolen vehicle trackers are already a thing, the real question is why you'd put your vehicle tracker in such an obvious and easy to remove place...

    7. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I keep saying about electronic IRS returns. They used to cost a fortune for a really insecure choice, and I refused to pay. Now it's free and I have to sign a waiver every year to send in the paper forms. /shrug

    8. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Using the vehicle's built-in GPS (basically any modern car) would be cheaper, because it's already there instead of $700. I assume most of them have a special program for rental/fleet - if they didn't, they would be crazy.

    9. Re:$699 + $7 per month? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Most delivery services already have a gps-enabled device which is used to track the driver's location as well as scan packages etc. Having an extra gps tracker on the license plate is not terribly useful.
      Some delivery services let you track their driver on a map as he delivers packages to various other places on his way to you, it's quite interesting to see the routes they take and gives you a reasonable estimate of when they will show up with your delivery. Better than sitting around all day waiting for a delivery that could come anywhere within a 16 hour window.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  9. Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by ai4px · · Score: 3, Informative

    Owners accustomed to normal steel license tags will appreciate not having to pay $7/month for a digital tag. I mean really, get a notice in the mail once a year, mail in some money and a few weeks later put a sticker on my license tag. Once a year.

    1. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by scdeimos · · Score: 2

      I mean really, get a notice in the mail once a year, mail in some money and a few weeks later put a sticker on my license tag. Once a year.

      Why, though? Why should you even have to mess around with a sticker once per year?

      Australia, for example, is so inundated with ALPRs that their collective Departments of Transport did away with the annual registration stickers a few years back. The ALPRs are on all the major roads and highways and will send you a nice, automated infringement notice and SPER fine for driving an unregistered vehicle should you somehow forget to pay your annual registration.

    2. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also nothing preventing them from doing the re-registration online (I think most states offer that now). They still have to send you the sticker, or you need to go pick it up, but a $...(how much does a stamp cost these days) stamp is still way cheaper than $7/month + $699!

    3. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Why should you even have to mess around with a sticker once per year?

      Because lacking the right sticker is probable cause for police to pull you over, and they like to have a variety of those. There's no reason they couldn't just run the plate for any car they stop to see if it's been registered. And as you point out, the automated licence plate readers could easily do the same.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, though? Why should you even have to mess around with a sticker once per year?

      Seriously? You're that friggin' lazy you can't open an envelop, walk to your car and apply a sticker one damn time a year? Or every two in my state.

      Want a reason? How about not having to pay a recurring fee for the 'privilege'?

    5. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Owners accustomed to normal steel license tags will appreciate not having to pay $7/month for a digital tag. I mean really, get a notice in the mail once a year, mail in some money and a few weeks later put a sticker on my license tag. Once a year.

      You still have stickers? We got rid of those a few years ago. Cops have number plate recognition cameras on their cars so can scan every single vehicle for registration/stolen/owner with loss of license/other as they drive down the road. I heard the latest patch now does facial recognition too which is under testing.
      Big Brother is already here...

    6. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      And as you point out, the automated licence plate readers could easily do the same.

      A LOT more easily. These things can scan 6 plates a second while driving down the street at 60km/h. A quick lap up and down the regular main roads and you've scanned thousands of vehicles. As long as the Big Brother element is taken care of (which it isn't) it is extremely effective at cleaning up the streets of bad drivers/cars.

    7. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Did you even bother read the rest of my comment? In Australia they don't have registration stickers any more. At all. Never ever more.

      Why should anybody have yearly stickers? They're completely pointless.

    8. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by sabbede · · Score: 1
      That only works if a State found the money to back an upgrade mandate so that 100% of local police and sheriff departments have them. Otherwise, a color coded sticker is still the easiest way for them to check.

      I think the town where I work has them now, but a couple of years ago I think they didn't because I was able to sneak by with a fake sticker for a month.

    9. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by houghi · · Score: 1

      In Belgium you pay yealy for your licence plate. So if you sell your car and not buy a new one, you have to give back your licence plate. If you do not, they will ask you to pay.
      If you forget to pay, they will go after you, just as when you did not oay your taxes.
      After that it will just be treated as any other debt you are unwilling or unable to pay. You have the plates? You pay. No plates? You do not pay.

      Now if you think you are smart and tell them your plates are stolen, that would be a bad thing when they find out.

      So no need to look anywhere. You either have the plates and you pay, or you have send them back and you do not have the plates and do not pay.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by rhazz · · Score: 1

      And in Canada we can now buy 2-year stickers, so...

    11. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Actually, many states went from one year, to two year, and now many don't require the stickers anymore at all.

    12. Re:Owners accustomed to an otherwise-paperless.... by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      That only works if a State found the money to back an upgrade mandate so that 100% of local police and sheriff departments have them.

      My state is not American so we don't have that archaic county/sheriff/local/state multiple level police system you have. We have one set of cops (state based - we have feds but they only deal with big stuff like border control and terrorism), so traffic mgmt is easy. Infringement penalties cover the traffic budget so funding is never an issue.

  10. Wow - Internet Payment by xaosflux · · Score: 1

    I can't wait: "thanks to the Reviver's Rplate Pro, registration can be paid via the internet". Maybe, maybe if they would have said I could pay for it with "an app" I'd be sold. But really, almost all tag renewals can already be paid "via the internet", and they just mail you your replacement tag/decals. If CA can't do this today, start?

    1. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      But really, almost all tag renewals can already be paid "via the internet", and they just mail you your replacement tag/decals.

      That's how it works in CA today.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe if they would have said I could pay for it with "an app" I'd be sold

      Why would you want to run special purpose software just to fill out a form?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I can't wait: "thanks to the Reviver's Rplate Pro, registration can be paid via the internet". Maybe, maybe if they would have said I could pay for it with "an app" I'd be sold. But really, almost all tag renewals can already be paid "via the internet", and they just mail you your replacement tag/decals. If CA can't do this today, start?

      Yup, came here to say exactly this. The only time I go to a state license agency storefront is when I'm very late in renewing - which, admittedly, is not exactly uncommon...

      This just seems like a complete waste of technology. Metal license plates can last *decades*. What problem are they trying to solve here, anyway?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A super cookie stays in your OS for years after using a .gov web gui service?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re: Wow - Internet Payment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only use gluten free blockchain sourced cookies. I think the Mauve ones have the most ram.

    6. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      California serves up supercookies? In spite of their own GDPR-like law?

      At any rate, giving them access to all the info they can scrape from your phone seems worse. Just use a LiveCD?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe if they would have said I could pay for it with "an app" I'd be sold

      Why would you want to run special purpose software just to fill out a form?

      Because the app has many, many forms, and you can link it to an account with all your details so the form fills itself in for most things. It also serves as a digital license so no more plastic. I worked on a project that built exactly this and it works great. Our state has over 800 licenses with dozens of different agencies, and most of your interactions with them can now be done with one app and previously multi-page forms are now a couple of drop-down lists and check-boxes. It really is a major improvement.

    8. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Because the app has many, many forms, and you can link it to an account with all your details so the form fills itself in for most things

      Does your webbrowser not automatically fill out forms for you? If not, I highly recommend you update. Also, I'm not sure I've ever found filling out a form difficult.I assume while your state has 800 licenses, most people have one or two, and it probably maxes at three or four. As someone working on the project, you naturally had to fill out tons of forms, and in testing its no doubt easier when filling out your test cases. I just doubt it is in real life.

      Or at least, I tend to assume whatever features I work on are super-real problems to most people.

      What info does your project gather from the phone hosting it? Device IDs? Location? Contacts?

      It also serves as a digital license so no more plastic.

      We obviously disagree on the easiest/best kind of license. I prefer paper airplane tickets too, but how comfortable are you letting an officer take your (unlocked) phone out of sight back to his car?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by PPH · · Score: 1

      Does your webbrowser not automatically fill out forms for you?

      No. Because every other evil web page would include a 1x1 pixel form down in one corner that idiot web browsers would fill in with my personal data.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Does your webbrowser not automatically fill out forms for you?

      It tries but fails miserably most of the time. I also trust my government more than I trust my Browser Developer/Global advertising conglomerate, since the government already has this info.
      The are also other features other than just form filling.

      Also, I'm not sure I've ever found filling out a form difficult.

      Good for you. Independent customer feedback was overwhelming positive (95%+ over millions of customers) for the new electronic process, so you'll excuse me if I take that over one guy on the Internet

      I assume while your state has 800 licenses, most people have one or two, and it probably maxes at three or four.

      Correct, but why have 800 separate forms when one app does it all? Or do you support your tax dollars being spent on highly inefficient paper based bureaucracy?

      I just doubt it is in real life.

      95%+ positive feedback from millions of customers. You know sometimes, just sometimes you don't need to guess at this.

      Or at least, I tend to assume whatever features I work on are super-real problems to most people.

      What info does your project gather from the phone hosting it? Device IDs? Location? Contacts?

      Ok I'm sensing some sort of tinfoil hat paranoia here. The app grabs the Device ID for auditing and that's it. It gives you the option of giving access to the camera so you can submit photos for some applications but that is a choice.

      >We obviously disagree on the easiest/best kind of license. I prefer paper airplane tickets too, but how comfortable are you letting an officer take your (unlocked) phone out of sight back to his car?

      You don't need to because he also has an app that validates it on the spot without him touching your phone. There is no legal obligation to hand over your device, unlike your license. Electronic checking also adds to the audit trail because every license check is captured and logged which minimises misuse.
      I get that you are cynical, that is a good trait, but sometimes other people have thought of all these things and technology actually improves things

    11. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I also trust my government more than I trust my Browser Developer/Global advertising conglomerate

      I trust my government with it, but not their subcontractor/3rd party library suppliers.

      Independent customer feedback was overwhelming positive (95%+ over millions of customers) for the new electronic process, so you'll excuse me if I take that

      While I think finding data from users is good, I'm not sure of the point you're making. I read that as 95% of people like the new process. Unless people had just performed the old process, they're likely unable to really make a comparison to the old process, even if explicitly asked for. The old process could have also enjoyed a 95% approval rate.

      why have 800 separate forms when one app does it all?

      Paper forms (printed on demand) or web pages are available at the library (or POD at many government offices). Not every has/wants a smartphone and a data plan. Further, I'm saying "one website, possibly with PDFs" not "800 paper forms on file"

      your tax dollars being spent on highly inefficient paper based bureaucracy?

      I don't really care. Data entry from a paper form is pretty cheap, OCR scanners exist, or a web form that didn't require specialized software could be built.

      95%+ positive feedback from millions of customers. You know sometimes, just sometimes you don't need to guess at this.

      My point was the infrequency of needing more than 1 or 2 forms. Your data point is irrelevant. Of course, if you have access to the survey, you probably know how many forms they would need on average.

      The app grabs the Device ID for auditing and that's it.

      Why on earth should it need the Device ID? Auditing is a pretty nebulous term. Are you afraid I might... fill out too many forms?

      You may call me paranoid, but the Device ID of my phone doesn't seem like the government's business.

      ou don't need to because he also has an app that validates it on the spot without him touching your phone.

      That's good. I'm still pretty convinced that he's going to reach out and grab my phone (even if it never goes back to his cop car). You know, cause if he tries to angle it so he can read it, are you going to pull your hand back?

      Electronic trails should also be generated when he looks up a piece of plastic.

      I get other people like apps, but I still just don't get. I like a small plastic card that doesn't require charging. I like websites accessed via HTTPS. I like the ability to not have every app reading the same Device ID (a permission that you don't get to deny) so that they can treat my phone as a supercookie++.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    12. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What problem are they trying to solve here, anyway?

      How to track citizens who have their phone turned off, or forgot to take it with them.

    13. Re:Wow - Internet Payment by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Why on earth should it need the Device ID?

      I'm not across all details of the project (and I'm not a mobile dev) but I believe some part of it was either checking for supported devices and/or OS versions to ensure the app was secure (ie attacker not using customised devices or ROMs as an attack vector) I may have that wrong, but because the app stored license details it was a security measure to detect/prevent possible abuse.

      the Device ID of my phone doesn't seem like the government's business.

      The other point worth noting, the agency that owns the app is separate from the agency that owns each license or permit. And legally we aren't allowed to share anything with those agencies other than specific details for the service (eg driver license) via published APIs. So while we as app provider can get this info, it isn't shared nor is it allowed to be.
      Also "The Government" isn't really a thing in a monolithic big brother type of way, it is a group of agencies all independent and if anything distrust each other more than you do. As a citizen I have more fear of big business than big government. At least where I live our government is relatively transparent and accountable.

      I like a small plastic card that doesn't require charging.

      I do too for some things. I don't like technology for technology sake, and one of my pet hates is the tech solves everything! mindset. I still prefer a plastic credit card despite having mobile pay apps on my phone, but prior to this app, dealing with various state agencies was a nightmare throwback from 1970's. The app is a major improvement.

  11. There's an APP for that! by argee · · Score: 1

    Hacker heaven!

  12. Use case? by Balthisar · · Score: 1

    What's the use case for an e-ink license plate?

    --
    --Jim (me)
    1. Re:Use case? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      To take a pile of money from an idiot.

    2. Re:Use case? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      What's the use case for an e-ink license plate?

      Making sure that even cars without GPS incorporated into the car's onboard electronics can be tracked via GPS in real time. Got to make sure that Jay Leno's vintage cars are properly taxed per mile when they enact the mileage tax because of electric cars not paying gasoline taxes.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    3. Re:Use case? by Balthisar · · Score: 1

      But that's a use case for GPS plates. Presumably one could do that without e-ink.

      --
      --Jim (me)
    4. Re:Use case? by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      And what else could it be? You take a rugged thing that doesn't need electricity and replace it with something fragile that does. And you take something that you don't want to ever change and you make it able to change. About the only way this would make sense is if they were going from e-ink to metal plates. Going the opposite direction means you cause a pile of expensive issues while fixing nothing.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:Use case? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Especially since the reg # stays with the car in CA instead of changing when ownership changes.

    6. Re:Use case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeap, just like Apple.

    7. Re:Use case? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      But that's a use case for GPS plates.

      These digital plates have GPS built-in. The point being that the GPS is the *actual* goal, not the convenience for vehicle owners. That's just the "sell" to help get them adopted with minimal push-back and then eventually required for every vehicle.

      Strat.

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    8. Re:Use case? by ACalcutt · · Score: 1

      How about...

      - remotely allowing changes to the license plate, say your car is stolen or your registrations expired... it could change visually so your vehicle is more visible to police (yay?)
      - disabling the plate visually when its not in use. maybe good for rental places or again for stolen cars.
      - make it so instead of the license plate following the car it follows the person driving. not sure this has any benefit, but registration could behave more like a license... you get it the car and the tag changes to your specific registration, with all your history and your responsibility. the driver would be able to be identified without even pulling you over, even in a different car you don't own. For something like this to work everyone's biometrics would probably need to be collected...for you know, safesy...and to start your car...hahaha

  13. Hackable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how long until someone hacks it with goatse.

  14. by mile is hard across lines by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    by mile is hard across lines and it may kill toll roads.

    also do you want rent cars to have forced admin fees?

  15. DVM inside AAA office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    last-minute trip to the DMV's no-appointment Hell Line

    Where I live (SF Bay area), there's a DMV office inside several AAA offices.

    I go to my local AAA office to do DMV stuff like renewing my car registration. I give them the DMV registration notice and a check, then they give me the registration slip and sticker for my car, and I'm done. No appointment, and the line usually isn't long.

    However if you need to take an eye test or a driver's test, you still need to go to the DMV.

  16. TFS and TFA at odds by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFS makes things sound all unicorns and rainbows, but farther down TFA things get a little muddy -- which make me think the editors didn't read it through:

    We also expect them to be targets for vandalism in San Francisco and Oakland. After all, it’s basically akin to putting Google Glass on one’s car, or, at the very least, a sign reading “Kick me, I’m the reason your landlord’s evicting you.”

    The units are also expensive. ... a Reviver setup will run you $699 for the digital plates, plus about $7 a month in recurring fees. That’s a pretty steep gouge just to trade away what little privacy you have left in exchange for not having to check the mail and place a fiddly little decal on your plate once every 12 months.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  17. Solution with no problem to solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What real purpose if there of having the plate be eink? People don't change their plate numbers that often. In fact most plates are good for about 10 years, thats about how long the reflective coating from 3m that is used on most steel plates lasts. I cant imagine the reflective coating/backing on this thing lasting any longer which means its going to have to be replaced every now and then. If 3m can't figure out how to make it last longer with the constant UV exposure i doubt some startup tech company will.

    And only just now being able to pay online?!?! WTF California! We have been able to do that in a state that you californians would probably call backwards hillbilly swamp (Florida) for at least a decade and a half if not longer. Florida will mail you your plate and renewal stickers after having paid online.

    If anything Florida is a state where this could be interesting, since we are the state with the most custom plates that you can get for choosing to pay a surcharge that goes to the charity that came up with the plate design. Come out with a color eink version and you could change the charity you support every couple months without needing to get a new steel plate issued. Does california even have custom plates like this? I seem to never see anything other than the standard california plate on cars.

    https://www.myfloridaspecialtyplate.com/gallery.html

    1. Re:Solution with no problem to solve by green1 · · Score: 1

      10 years? I'm going on 18 with my plate right now and no end in sight. (Though I'll admit the annual registration stickers are getting a bit thick as they tell you not to remove the old ones when applying the news ones, and the renewal month sticker has faded completely to white)

      My father's plate is now 34 years old. As for reflective coating. Government gave up on that 25 years ago, "cost savings"

      Solution without a problem comes to mind.

    2. Re:Solution with no problem to solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Florida replaces them every 10 years

      http://allfloridaautotagsandtitles.com/faqs.html

      Why do I have to get a new license plate every 10 years? Mine looks fine.
      Section 320.06(1) (b), Florida statutes states, requires 10 year replacement of all license plates. The replacement is necessary because license plates must be fully reflectorized "to ensure" visibility for law enforcement purposes. The vendor of the reflectorized sheeting, 3M Company, recommends replacement after 10 years because the reflectorized sheeting shows reduced light reflection at night for 10 years although the appearance may appear to be fine.

    3. Re:Solution with no problem to solve by green1 · · Score: 1

      As I said, the government here gave up on reflective 25 years ago to save money. So our plates aren't reflective, and they never replace them.

      There was a push a couple years ago to design new plates with reflective and such, but there was so much public backlash against spending so many millions for no reason that the government was forced to give up. Nobody wanted the government to waste that kind of money when the current plates worked just fine.

  18. New useless technical gadget blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "GPS enabled"

    Whoooop there it is whooop there it is.

  19. I don't have to go anywhere near the DMV by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    just to get my registration and haven't in decades. And in my neck of the woods we just passed laws requiring the DMV be properly funded and that you couldn't steal money intended for the DMV and stuff it in the general fund. After that the problem was solved. And that was decades ago too. The last time I needed a new license picture (lost my hair) it took 30 minutes during peak hours.

    The DMV only sucks in "Starve the Beast" places that intentionally under fund government services so they can point and say "See! We told you government's the problem!". No shit when you set it up to fail on purpose it fails.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  20. What's the advantage? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Stolen cars are going to have the gps tracked plate ripped off, maybe chucked in the back of a random pickup to throw off authorities.

    Where I'm from a car gets a plate when you first register it, when the registration runs out you pay for a renewal and keep the existing plate. They post a new label to put in the windscreen when you renew online.

    As for vanity plates, it'll be cheaper for them to switch it but you can bet they'll charge you more for the "convenience" of OTA updates.

    1. Re:What's the advantage? by Cesare+Ferrari · · Score: 1

      Where I live, the car comes with plates and you never change them. In 25 years of car ownership i've never bought a licence plate for my cars.

    2. Re:What's the advantage? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Same here. If you buy a vanity plate. they'll courier you new plates with a bag to send the old ones back too. You never have to line up at the "DMV".

      They're replacing a stamped aluminium plate with an electronic device that requires power and a cell signal and has the downside of GPS tracking for law abiding citizens (and an easy way for criminals to discard it, hey, they already committed a crime by stealing your car, disabling to removing the tracker-plate isn't any worse)

  21. first world problems ... by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 0

    why? nothing wrong with analog license plates, if anything remove the fucking registration stickers.

  22. Pay per mile driven by tgibson · · Score: 1

    Once these become ubiquitous, California will more easily be able to implement their proposed Tax on miles driven.

  23. stolen plates even easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... one never has to make a last-minute trip to the DMV's no-appointment Hell Line.

    Issuing new plates every year is idiotic which is why most states (and countries) use registration stickers. This product is only 'useful' where plates are issued annually, or new stickers must be put on an entire fleet of vehicles.

    ... easy to upgrade to a special-interest plate ...

    With an e-ink screen, upgrading to a 'stolen' plate will be even easier. Or, editing the plate to show next year's registration sticker, for free, will be a priority for criminals.

  24. Re: solution in search of a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The term you're thinking of is "solution in search of a problem."

    Next think you know, they'll add blockchain technology. Oh, and they'll probably find a way to use waterproof tape somewhere, in case your bumper springs a leak.

  25. Flattens the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they don't mention is it draws power from the car battery, so you cannot leave the car parked and go on long holidays because it flattens the battery fast.

    And you cannot unplug the battery because then the car would be without valid plates and towed away.

    What a sad piece of shit tech.

    1. Re:Flattens the battery by sabbede · · Score: 1
      But... you get to pay $7 a month! And digital! Everything is good about this idea!

      GODDAMNIT MAN THEY TASTE LIKE CANDY!

  26. Car and driver unavailable in EU? by Archimonde · · Score: 1

    "Sorry, this content is not available in your region." The shit is ridiculous, I don't understand why they would block EU users from viewing their content.

    --
    Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    1. Re:Car and driver unavailable in EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, because EU users voted for GDPR.. Dur...

  27. Tracking and advertising by bradley13 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aside from the implications of the built-in GPS tracker, do note that the plates are designed to show advertising. They show the full-sized number while the vehicle is in motion, but when stopped, the number can be reduced in size, shoved in a corner, and the rest of the plate used to display ads. At the moment, for corporate fleets, the idea is for the corporation to display whatever they want. It won't be long before private plates also become advertising platforms.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  28. A solution in search of a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A solution in search of a problem. A problem manufactured by some politically-sleazy individuals who happened to be connected with officials in high places in order to manufacture a demand for their "cure". Hard pass.

  29. The joke is on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a land line, they'll NEVER find me. SUCKERS!!!

    1. Re:The joke is on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're at home.

  30. IT impacts prisoners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 less job for prisoners; stamping license plates

  31. And that's how you solve a non-existing problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doh...

  32. Cars by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What a backward people you are.

    We have one plate, on a car, it stays on that car pretty much for its life.

    You then pay "road tax" (not actually true, but that's what it's called by people), online, verified with your recent vehicle test results, that you're insured on the insurance databases etc. and if you fail to do so, any police car with ANPR will flag you as you drive past, certain places (like London's congestion charging zones) will check your plate as you drive through, any traffic warden knows you're not up-to-date, and your car can be towed away.

    No stickers. Nothing to "steal" / "forge". No new plates. No chips inside plates. No offline process necessary (but you can still do it in any ordinary post office like for the past 50 years).

    I thought America was supposed to be at the forefront of technology and progress?

    1. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're trolling, but I'll bite. We already have all these things. This digital plate thing is just a money grab by someone.

      Any state I've seen already has internet renewal/inspection databases/police cars with ANPR/license plate toll readers. I don't know of any actual towing that may occur due to expired registration but that to me seems something of a benefit. You can be fined but not stranded somewhere. (Also in my state the fine is mostly dismissed it you get caught up on the registration within 7 days).

    2. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can do all of those things too.. But privacy people freak out and prevent anything like that from happening.

    3. Re:Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a backward people you are.

      We don't have cameras on every building, lamppost and vehicle to monitor every innocent person like 1984.

      I thought the EU and UK were supposed to be at the forefront of human rights and dignity?

    4. Re:Cars by ledow · · Score: 1

      We are.

      Maybe if you ever actually visited the UK, you'd realise that what you say is bollocks and most people live quite nice ordinary lives without cameras except where you'd want them.

      I drive 20 miles to work each morning (hey, I live inside London). There are precisely two speed-activated cameras en-route.

      By comparison, my workplace has - of its own accord - installed 36 cameras over two sites just for basic, private security, though (i.e. nobody watching them... just there in case something happens to reel back... I know because the controller box is in my server room and only I have access). Technically, my own flat has more cameras in it than my commute to work.

      P.S. My neighbours were concerned about my legally-required CCTV monitoring stickers and asked to see my system, that's how uncomfortable the average person is with such monitoring.

      Come to the country you're disparaging and see how accurate your bullshit is before you spout it.

  33. Yeah, right ... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1
    Love this line from the article

    " The city says it will not use the plates to track workers. "

    Am I the only one who tacked on "for now" to the end of it?

    Side note: Anyone want to start a pool on how long it is before one of these plates gets hacked?

  34. How long ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... do it's batteries last? Oh, you expect me to connect that thing to my car's electrical system? Good luck when my shitbox blows another fuse. Or my alternator experiences a load dump.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. Why would you need digital plates? by Rhipf · · Score: 1

    Its not like the license plate number changes on a regular basis so why do they need to have an LCD/e-ink display?

    It also isn't necessary to have a digital license plate to do online registration of the vehicle. Ontario (and I assume a vast number of other areas) has had the ability to do online renewals of registration for years.

  36. Aren't they already digital? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    I thought all license plates were already digital, encoded in base 36 or something close to that.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  37. Pay over internet by hfox · · Score: 1

    I can already pay my registration over the internet with my plain old metal plate.

  38. Staying disconnected and uninspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a techie AND a car guy. I live in Montana and one of the things I like about it here (I am from Los Angeles) is that we have no vehicle inspections and once a vehicle is 10 years old we can get permanent registration which costs about $120. Never have to register again.

    As for all that technology in vehicles today, none of my 6 cars was built during this century. Somehow I get by just fine, even without all those cup holders some of you can't seem to live without.

    1. Re:Staying disconnected and uninspected by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

      If you're a techie long enough, you eventually realize there are some things tech is fantastic for, some things it's hit or miss on, other things it should never need be applied to. It sounds like you've discovered that already.

    2. Re:Staying disconnected and uninspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are in one of those states that creates the rust buckets that can't be registered elsewhere.

    3. Re:Staying disconnected and uninspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are one of those people who junk a perfectly good car after 3 years, because it's "old". Keep being a good little consumer and stay on the treadmill of revolving debt for auto loans.

      Meanwhile, I'll keep driving my rust bucket that has been paid off for the past 7 years. My car exists for one reason, to make me money. It gets me to work, it gets me home. I'm still spending less than what two car payments would cost in a year in maintenance and repairs.

  39. I don't see the purpose by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    All I see from the article is " it will cost a lot, and we will charge you a monthly fee to do what you do now for free. The benefit is it saves the DMV time and effort".
    If so, why are the end users paying for it?

  40. What a TERRIBLE Idea by Ferretman · · Score: 2

    The number of ways this is open to abuse is mind-boggling....

    Ferret

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  41. How long will it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My last car lasted 15 years before the engine died and the cost to replace the engine was not worth the trouble. The plates are still in great condition, not even a speck of rust, and could easily be re-used. How long will these digital plates last outdoors, particularly in a state with a temperature swing of 140F between Summer and Winter.

  42. Wow, pay over the internet!?!?!? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    registration can be paid via the internet, assuring that one never has to make a last-minute trip to the DMV's no-appointment Hell Line.

    What moron actually goes into DMV to pay car registration? I've been paying online for about the last 10? 15? years? It's been so long that I've forgotten when I started paying that way. And what this has to do with a waste-of-money 'digital' license plate is beyond me.

  43. Does Musk already have one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asking for my boss Gavin Belson.

  44. Free for all fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until someone hacks these to display whatever plate number they want - like Mark Zuckerberg's plate when you are running a red light....

  45. So ALPR is obsolete now? by jtgd · · Score: 1

    How many days until the hackers figure out how to crack this thing? Once you can display any ol' license plate number you want, what good is an ALPR? It's a criminal's wet dream. Imagine your getaway car can change the plate number every minute.

    --
    J
  46. damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just about to go world wide with my license plate switcher (James bond style of course) and they have to one up me with an electronic version that only requires bits to be changed and no mechanical process!

    Seriously though, how long until one of these gets torn down and hacked? How do they communicate to the government agency required to manage all of the plates? can the signals be replicated locally?

    It seems like all of the benefits of an authority having use for these plates goes away with a couple of bits. if you know you have one of these plates it doesnt seem like it would be too hard to disable the gps as well as any other communications and then use custom silicon to drive the display thus allowing criminals an upper-hand. I mean the only saving grace is that the communication protocols are unknown for now but how long will that last? how long until people are able to spoof the communications from another valid tag.

    Technology is a tool to be used for good or evil, always be aware of unintended consequences!

  47. Solution in search of problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What problem does this address?

    I can pay for my registration online now. The only time I go to the DMV office is to get a new photo taken for my drivers license -- that's once every ten years. Plus, my metal license plate probably cost lest than $10 to make and will last longer than the car.

    Sorry, SillyConman Valley, but this is one bit of 'disruption' that only you morons are going to be adopting.