Slashdot Mirror


Internal Microsoft Poll Shows Employees Are Less Satisfied With Pay (cnbc.com)

According to an annual companywide survey, obtained by CNBC, Microsoft employees said they're less fairly paid in 2018 than they were in any of the past three years. When asked if "total compensation (base pay, bonus, equity) is competitive compared to similar jobs at other companies," only 61 percent said it was, down from 65 percent in 2017 and 67 percent each of the two prior years. From the report: Additionally, just 62 percent of the employees agreed that "people are rewarded according to their job performance," down from 63 percent last year and 64 percent in 2016. Those two questions received some of the lowest scores on the survey. The company said that 86 percent of Microsoft's employees participated. The results, shared by Chief People Officer Kathleen Hogan in April, are a further indication of the challenge that Microsoft and other tech companies face in hiring and retaining top talent. Microsoft's headquarters in Redmond, Washington, is just a few miles from Amazon's home and isn't far from the Seattle offices of Google, Facebook and a growing number of start-ups. Chief People Officer Kathleen Hogan said the company takes the issue "seriously," and that it will work to ensure a more balanced pay structure.

54 comments

  1. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why is this even news? Soon Slashdot will be featuring articles about clothes and fashion tips.

    1. Re:Who cares? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is this even news?

      Because it is about salaries at a tech company. What could be more relevant to Slashdotters, other than maybe the cost of renting a basement?

      I am surprised Microsoft is publicizing this. They are hurting recruitment by broadcasting that they have crappy pay, and raising expectations of salary increases among existing employees.

    2. Re: Who cares? by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the pay is junk, it means costs are down. Investors like to hear that, donâ(TM)t they?

    3. Re:Who cares? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I am surprised Microsoft is publicizing this. They are hurting recruitment by broadcasting that they have crappy pay, and raising expectations of salary increases among existing employees.

      They're publicizing it, because they are saying that they are going to do something about it.

      Their employees are probably already whining about it anyway on Socialist Media, so this is to counter that.

      Yeah, they're raising expectations . . . maybe they can convince some folks to stay on for another year, to see if Microsoft follows through . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re: Who cares? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      If the pay is junk, it means costs are down. Investors like to hear that, donâ(TM)t they?

      Any sensible investor would see this as a warning that payroll expenses are likely going up, and profits may decline.

    5. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Bill Gates is such a libtard who sold us out to avoid antitrust problems, maybe his employees should all join WashTech org

    6. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're publicizing it, because they are saying that they are going to do something about it.

      Don't get you hopes up though. "Doing something" would most probably meant (1) replacing those "less satisfied employees" with H1B, or (2) move the work to India so those "less satisfied" could be laid off, or (3) just lay them off.

      After the "less satisfied" are gone, obviously average satisfaction of those remain would go up.

    7. Re: Who cares? by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      For companies in some sectors perhaps, but if you suddenly have a lot of people earning more money, they're going to spend some of it, which means other companies are going to see larger revenues and more profits. The trick is being able to determine where that extra money is going to go.

      Also, if you offer the best pay, you can probably attract better employees. If that allows you to deliver superior products to market more quickly than your competition, it could mean that you actually increase revenue and profit even though you spend more money.

      The other side of that is that if you aren't paying well enough, you'll probably lose some employees who go elsewhere seeking better pay. The employees that you lose are going to be the ones that have better skills and can convince someone to pay them more, and not the paper shufflers that don't do all that much. If employees roughly follow the 80/20 rule, then losing some of your best 20%, probably means losing significantly more than that in productivity.

    8. Re:Who cares? by antdude · · Score: 1

      I wonder what type of job AC has. Or if this troll even has 1. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:Who cares? by sodul · · Score: 2

      I use to joke that Microsoft marketing strategy was to tell customers "stick with us the next version sucks less" and then underdeliver.

      I looks like they are applying this marketing strategy to their employees as well. Well, it worked for a few short decades.

    10. Re: Who cares? by talldean · · Score: 2

      In tech, you generally lose the top half of your successful employees if you don't pay as well as other nearby competitors. Microsoft... does not pay as well as other nearby competitors.

      The Ballmer years seemed to staunch slower product development with more successful sales, until that stopped working.

      Nadella's been really successful at turning things around for their eng teams, and putting some balance back in there, but if they keep bleeding people... that's not good.

    11. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop feeding the boring and pedantic troll Shanghai puppet account faggot bill.

    12. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been trying to hurt recruitment for years. The whole tech industry is currently trying to discourage males, and particularly white ones, from applying. They're on a mission to "diversify" their workforce. And, in a turn of events nobody could have predicted, making personnel decisions on anything other than ability and merit degrades morale.

  2. Chief People Officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take the public comments of a CPO seriously, just like the Chief Marketing Officer and pretty much anything C-level. Their words are always given in utmost earnesty.

  3. Github employees, this is your future by LaughingRadish · · Score: 2

    This is what Github employees, now Microsoft employees have to look forward to.

  4. Because Amazon.com is minting millionaires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They see the Amazon.com brogrammers living fat in downtown Seattle with their amazing stock equity.

  5. Top of Dotcom Bubble 2.0? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back in the late 90s, anyone who had a passing familiarity with computers was commanding a huge salary regardless of talent. I'm sure Microsoft is in an arms race with Amazon and Google these days. All three companies are going at a breakneck pace trying to develop new cloud services or make the ones they already run cheaper to run. The race is on to lock as many customers into their cloud provider as they can because no one is buying software licenses anymore.

    What's interesting is that with everything moving to the cloud, these 3 companies and a few others will probably be the chief consumers of developer and infrastructure engineering talent. And at least in previous years, Microsoft selected for highly talented people and paid enough to ensure they didn't run off to a competitor. I've worked with people who've been at Microsoft for 20+ years...if you're really talented they do a lot to keep you. I think this is why that survey result is surprising.

    We'll see what happens in a couple years. I'm betting a huge chunk of cloud consumption is startups selling bags of dog food and AI-powered, IoT driven, blockchain-enabled subscription boxes online. When that goes away, people are still going to use AWS/Azure/GCP, but I just don't think they'll get the stupid levels of revenue they're getting today from the VC money.

    1. Re:Top of Dotcom Bubble 2.0? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I'm betting a huge chunk of cloud consumption is startups selling bags of dog food and AI-powered, IoT driven, blockchain-enabled subscription boxes online.

      I think most companies have started moving to the 'cloud' in one way or another. Most of those startups aren't using Azure, that's for people who use C# or want to be integrated with Microsoft technologies, and this is what startups think of C#.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Top of Dotcom Bubble 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a 7 year old blog post is indicative of the attitudes of today's startups!

    3. Re:Top of Dotcom Bubble 2.0? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      That guy is an idiot, don't listen to him. And not like C# isn't open source these days. Get a life, you poser.

    4. Re:Top of Dotcom Bubble 2.0? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it actually is. The only startups I've seen using C# are in Seattle.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. I read complaints about all of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not just tech, lot's pf people surveyed think their job is worthy of more money. It's that old saying "the grass is always greener" this is what people are always searching for. Only so much a company can do to keep people, in the end some people will leave thinking the pastures are greener elsewhere.

    1. Re:I read complaints about all of them by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Sometimes those greener pastures are greener because of all the fertilizer, if you get my drift.

    2. Re: I read complaints about all of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately the grass typically is greener because it's easier to get a raise through jumping ships than it is to in your existing company.

    3. Re:I read complaints about all of them by Chameleon+Man · · Score: 1

      Also, when surveyed by your company on whether you're happy with your pay or not, why would you say you are? I want my company to think that I could leave on a dime and that they have to keep offering me more and more money to stay. Just seems logical.

  7. ms's solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO PAY FOR YOU! hahahahaha

  8. I worked there for 7 years by richrz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About the time I left (~5 years ago) pay was starting to stagnate and become much less competitive. Older more experienced folks were pushed out and the youngins' are happy with the free rides around campus/perks/quality of life stuff with terrible pay. It really is a race to the bottom at that company as no one I know that is REALLY good at their job still works there.

    1. Re:I worked there for 7 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does MS provide daycare on site? That means a lot for quality of life.

    2. Re:I worked there for 7 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really is a race to the bottom at that company as no one I know that is REALLY good at their job still works there.

      This explains a lot about Windows 10.

    3. Re:I worked there for 7 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess you didn't know many people there. Fact is, you only have to look at Microsoft's developer blogs to see that they still have an awful lot of people that REALLY know their shit, as in cream of the crop, global top 10 in their field.

      Hell, you don't even have to rely on blogs, as Microsoft is now the top contributor to open source, you can actually go and look at the code:

      https://medium.freecodecamp.or...

      It sounds awfully lot like you were pushed out because you weren't very good and are bitter about it, that seems incredibly likely given you apparently don't know talent when you see it. If you thought they weren't very good it's because you weren't competent enough to see why they were good.

      Saying older more experienced folks were pushed out is laughable when folks like Russinovich are now CTO of Azure, and Mundie is a senior advisor to the CEO. The only ones that have been pushed out are those, that like you, are just awful at their jobs. No one who knows what they're doing whatever their age has been kicked out of Microsoft.

  9. Pay and expenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing is pay, another thing is that as more people move in to attractive areas living expenses skyrocket.

  10. Inside perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perspective from inside: it sometimes feels like advancement is based more on time put in than than value delivered, up until a certain level at least. Some of the smartest, most productive people in the world are here but then there are entire teams that you can’t figure out what they do. This is very frustrating at lower levels because it can feel like no matter how well you perform you are going to advance at only a slightly faster pace than people who are just coasting. Thankfully I love what I work on and get paid well to do it

    1. Re:Inside perspective by ErichTheRed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This happens at every big company, and Microsoft also has super-deep pockets so they can afford to have some dead wood. If you're measuring 'time put in" as years with the company, that's true...there are some people in big companies who know the right people and can coast for decades. But you can also measure time put in as how many 100-hour weeks you put in on product deathmarches, how tethered you are to VSTS 24 hours a day, etc. Those people who are workaholics will also be recognized over very productive, smart people because they're more visible. They're the ones leaving work at 1 AM and coming back for more.

      As a counter example to MS dead wood, look at HP/HPE. The bottom has dropped out of non-white box servers and storage...if you believe the pundits no one is buying new equipment. Companies also have less of a need for third-rate crappy offshore IT support. As a result, HP/HPE/DXC have been throwing thousands of people overboard. We actually do buy equipment still, and it's a normal occurence to have the person you've been talking with for years suddenly get fired. HP could afford to be bloatted when they were making a healthy margin on servers and selling a ton of them.Azure.

      Microsoft doesn't have this problem. They have huge cash reserves and are about to lock every single Windows enterprise into Office 365 and Azure. I wouldn't expect the dead wood to go away anytime soon.

    2. Re:Inside perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the smartest, most productive people in the world are here but then there are entire teams that you can’t figure out what they do.

      Oh, I can tell you what they do. They surf the internet all day for links to AI, ML and development papers that they can spam in their group's email and Slack channels so they can name drop and look like they're relevant. Of course they have no clue about the technology in those papers because they don't understand even basic things like high-school level maths and why using round() everywhere produces compounding errors.

    3. Re:Inside perspective by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This happens at every big company, and Microsoft also has super-deep pockets so they can afford to have some dead wood.

      It's also large so it can't afford to not have some dead wood.

      Organisation at scale is a difficult problem, and I don't think there are any organisations the size of MS which don't have significant amounts of dead wood. There are always people coasting, or doing fuck-all in a departmant which keeps getting reorganised or twiddling their thumbs on a product which is on a death march or about to get cancelled etc.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Inside perspective by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Dead wood is also hard to identify. I remember hearing a talk while back where the manager type talked about firing the bottom 10% of performers.
      Turns out a decent percentage of those weren't getting their work done, but only because they were doing everyone else's. When they got fired, productivity for the department plummeted.
      Dead wood isn't always useless and some metrics can't be measured more then a step or two away.

    5. Re:Inside perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Welch management model - always cut the bottom 10%.
      However, a few inherent problems as I understand it:
        - The Welch model works great for small companies with tight budgets, but once you become established, its can be detrimental for a number of reasons, especially how I understand how it works at MS:
                - MS people write their own reviews. If you suck at writing, you are seen as a "bottom 10%-er" even if that's not actually the case.
                - people begin holding back just to have an 'ace up their sleeve' - often if they get canned, they take it to a competitor - isn't this what happened to 3MLabs?

      As for MS and pay - on a reddit thread on this same topic someone mentioned the "Comp 2000" program and another about changes in healthcare coverage. I take this statement from one of those comments: "MS hiring offers today are unchanged compared to 2010 - you get the same starting rate today they offered almost 10 years ago for the same role at the same level." And if what another said about how their benefits packages changed for healthcare, its more out of pocket on top of that.

      And I've heard MS is struggling to find people. No wonder.

  11. low pay = more H1B's that locked to the job and wi by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    low pay = more H1B's that locked to the job and will do 80+ hours a week so they don't kicked out the USA.

  12. Re:low pay = more H1B's that locked to the job and by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    low pay = more H1B's that locked to the job and will do 80+ hours a week so they don't kicked out the USA.

    It's kind of weird actually. Back in the British Colonial times, English companies went to India to exploit the workers there.

    Now the workers from India come to the US voluntarily to be exploited there.

    Lazy American companies! They can't even be bothered to travel abroad to exploit folks!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  13. Breaking News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the privileged 1% are happy with their pay, the other 99% aren't. Seriously, is /. using The Onion for news sources?

  14. and all of these MS people make too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it's ok to get rich while most people in the world don't have adequate capital to live or prosper, after all, what's a few billion poor kids more or less, just so long as the rich can get richer, greed knows no limits, denial is rampant and this is the age of entitlement and selfishness, fuck the consequences and the environment, after all it's ok because our wealth makes us immune from ethical issues and thank goodness we all live in the first world, where our special rights are protected so we can screw everybody else

    1. Re:and all of these MS people make too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people like you make me sick. Complete hypocrites with the luxuries to post on the internet from their computers while bitching that others aren't doing enough to fix the world. If you stopped bitching and went out and helped those people you would make more of a difference then whining while enjoying your luxuries.

  15. Hahaha by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    That " anonymous " survey they took is anything but. ( Like the ones my own company demands we take annually asking how amazing we think the company is )

    They way they'll " fix " the pay problem is to fire all those who are complaining about the pay. Next survey will show a dramatic increase in the number of " happy " employees who think their pay is too generous.

    Because of this amazing turn around, some high level executive will get an amazing bonus for doing such a great job for corporate morale !

  16. Here is an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay H1Bs as much as their competitors. If they are just as skilled as those who they replace and Microsoft just can't find any Americans to do the job then it means that Microsoft is just being racist by paying H1Bs less.

  17. Re:low pay = more H1B's that locked to the job and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the workers from India come to the US voluntarily to be exploited there.

    No. The workers from India come to the US voluntarily to exploit the companies.

  18. dead wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of dead wood in IT who basically get paid what i call 'appearance money' to show up. Most teams are held together by one or two switched on people who do all the work and are well paid. The 'dead wood; then complain they don't get paid enough as others in the team and complain they want equal pay and titles etc.

  19. #FightFor15KMore? by Chas · · Score: 1

    What? People are unsatisfied because they're being asked obviate the need for their skillset by being made to train some pennies-on-the-dollar cubicle farmer to do everything they're paid a fair wage to do, then getting laid off?

    Hell, if I knew my employer were trying to do that, *I* would be unsatisfied with my pay too.
    Since my pay is balanced against where I live and how I live. And the fact that I'm going to have to make savings stretch when they, inevitably, let me go.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  20. Well, duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft expects people to take a pay cut for the privilege of working at the company; meanwhile people are leaving Microsoft and starting companies that do nothing but staffing for Microsoft and making more.

    Microsoft has several problems; They don't pay market wages, they are not willing to pay over market wages to keep people if google or amazon is willing to, and they are addicted to screwing over contractors who really are perma-temps no matter what rules they put in place.

  21. Salary vs stock by ayesnymous · · Score: 2

    I have a friend who works at Microsoft. In the mid 2000s, after Microsoft stock had been stagnant for years, he said that Microsoft was trying to increase their salaries to make up for the fact that the stock was a poor performer. I guess now that their stock has been skyrocketing the last few years, they want more stock instead of a good salary.

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Good pay by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    does not make up for that spying on people feeling.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  24. shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now microsoft employees know how every woman in the engineering field feels

  25. Yeah, like that will get fixed. by Blue23 · · Score: 1

    We have employee engagement surveys every years to show things like this. And invariably the make serious noises about problem areas, but no follow-up ever happens on them if they involve compensation (including costs of health care and other perks in addition salary), or lack of faith in senior management.

    Where the numbers are good they wave them like a flag and give pats on the back (but nothing more tangible).

    Now where it gets interesting is when you don't look at it monolithically. We would use an outside company to do this, and even though I am sure many employees didn't believe this, they would only deliver results in aggregate, with a minimum number of respondents to make it hard to determine any one employee's answer. But those are still interesting. When you have one team with vastly different scores then related teams, good or bad, you can take a look at what is different.

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.