Slashdot Mirror


China Hacked a Navy Contractor and Secured a Trove of Highly Sensitive Data on Submarine Warfare (washingtonpost.com)

Ellen Nakashima and Paul Sonne, reporting for The Washington Post: Chinese government hackers have compromised the computers of a Navy contractor, stealing massive amounts of highly sensitive data related to undersea warfare -- including secret plans to develop a supersonic anti-ship missile for use on U.S. submarines by 2020, according to American officials. The breaches occurred in January and February, the officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation. The hackers targeted a contractor who works for the Naval Undersea Warfare Center, a military organization headquartered in Newport, R.I., that conducts research and development for submarines and underwater weaponry. The officials did not identify the contractor. Taken were 614 gigabytes of material relating to a closely held project known as Sea Dragon, as well as signals and sensor data, submarine radio room information relating to cryptographic systems, and the Navy submarine development unit's electronic warfare library. The Washington Post agreed to withhold certain details about the compromised missile project at the request of the Navy, which argued that their release could harm national security.

112 comments

  1. Heard this before by eneville · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... it was in the book 'The Cuckoo's Egg'.

    1. Re:Heard this before by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      I was about to post this, but you were first.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
  2. It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just expect that Russia, China, and the USA are always trying this type of espionage on each other and expect that they will occasionally succeed.

    1. Re: It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This isnt new and hasnt been stopped regardless of who POTUS may be. The US just takes the hit without ever retaliating.

    2. Re:It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it definitely sounds like something Obama or Clinton would have done.

      I assume that is what you meant.

    3. Re:It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but considering that this isn't he first one, there's no excuse for these materials still being accessible via the internet. At some point, an adversary is going to get data if they want it badly enough, but the laughably poor security practices involved here are ridiculous.

    4. Re:It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your Trump ButtHurt is so bad, you'll need an ass transplant in 2024

    5. Re:It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're just a plain faggort.

    6. Re:It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't nice, young man.

    7. Re: It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is everyone being so crude about ivanka all of a sudden?

    8. Re: It would be news if they didn't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly because her daddy would be banging her if he could get away with it.
      And we know that he's frustrated that he can't watch porn in the White House: http://www.newsweek.com/trump-...

  3. Could harm national security? by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think that horse has bolted and is grazing happily in a field right now.

    You'd think a defense contractor would know not to store top secret information on internet accessible machines but I guess there's stupid in every organisation.

    1. Re:Could harm national security? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      Yeah they were probably internet attached using Windows 7 Pro instead of the much more secure Windows 10 Enterprise

    2. Re:Could harm national security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey! They used store it behind a Cisco firewall. That's safe, right? right?

    3. Re:Could harm national security? by PPH · · Score: 1

      You'd think a defense contractor would know

      They have a really good example.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Could harm national security? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The FBI attempts to help this by sending 2 agents with accents to random contractors. One to witness the other.
      They make "offers" for "cash" to a contractor and wait to see what the contractors does.
      Report all details as told to?
      Accept the offer?
      So many contractors now. The few FBI agents with accents and the same security clearance level have so much work to do all over the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Could harm national security? by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Top secret? I doubt it. The WaPo article that the /. post links to says "The data stolen was of a highly sensitive nature despite being housed on the contractor’s unclassified network. The officials said the material, when aggregated, could be considered classified..." So if the "officials" are telling the truth, there wasn't any classified material there.

      The "aggregated" statement is the notion that if you put enough of the right unclass material together, it becomes classified. I know a little about classification, and I've never understood that theory. At any rate, I would assume it might at best become Confidential, which is two steps below Top Secret.

      On the other hand, the WaPo article does say that the material "includ[ed] secret plans to develop a supersonic anti-ship missile". If by "secret" they mean "Secret" (i.e. the actual classification, as opposed to the idea that my vacation plans are secret), then the article contradicts itself.

    6. Re:Could harm national security? by John_3000 · · Score: 1

      "The Washington Post agreed to withhold certain details about the compromised missile project at the request of the Navy, which argued that their release could harm national security."

      So letting Americans know what the Chinese know is a threat. That's hard for me to understand.

    7. Re:Could harm national security? by mcswell · · Score: 1

      For better or worse, I think that's standard procedure in cases like this. Maybe they meant they didn't want the Russians, Koreans and Iranians to get a hold of the information too.

      Some on this /. page have suggested this might have been a honey pot, with misleading information. I have no idea, but that would be comforting :-).

    8. Re:Could harm national security? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yeah the only issue with those cisco firewall is the breathing of the NSA I hear when on my cisco phone, but yeah they are tight as a drum for security.

  4. the next breach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What systems are running these computers? I read very often about breaches where a particular OS from Redmond is used....

  5. And yet we keep buying their products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is like Mr Garrisons bicycle. Cheap products but they have you at both ends.

    1. Re: And yet we keep buying their products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://southpark.cc.com/clips/153051/flexi-grips

  6. Here Come The Chinese Knockoff Submarines! by OpenSourceAllTheWay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ever seen a knockoff sneaker with Niiikee printed on it that you can wear for 2 weeks before it comes apart? Or an AyePhone X with a 800 x 460 pixel screen and Android running on it? Or a Chinese knockoff of a Ford SUV that crumbles to dust when it hits an obstacle at a mere 30MPH? Well... heeeeere comes the submarine equivalent of that: The engine makes enough noise to be detected from a continent away. The sub can dive to about 150 feet before the hull cracks and everybody on board dies. And when they try to launch missiles from the sub, the missiles launch vertically down, exploding the sea floor... aaand the knockoff submarine as well. Tom Clancy could have written a novel about this: The Hunt For Red Shrimp.

    1. Re:Here Come The Chinese Knockoff Submarines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lock them up? Or only if the company was run by a female?

    2. Re:Here Come The Chinese Knockoff Submarines! by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      an AyePhone X

      Aren't those made in Scotland?

    3. Re:Here Come The Chinese Knockoff Submarines! by null+etc. · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that the Chinese government has the same standards of quality as the factories that churn out cheap knock-offs of consumer products, amirite?

    4. Re: Here Come The Chinese Knockoff Submarines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many times all that's different is the label. The shoe is exactly the same. It's done on the third shift with less QA or they are the ones with some minor defect like shade of color being wrong.

      Yes, some will fall apart but many have the same quality as the branded one.

    5. Re:Here Come The Chinese Knockoff Submarines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the West keeps thinking that, you are in for a world of hurt.

      I have worn usd 0.50 slippers for a year, had to use em to hike upstream a river when my original reebox broke down. Im wearing a 2 year old usd 2.50 slipper now, a hand stiched leather upper and inner usd 70 for 3 years and am able to find great value in many aliexpress things.

      Dont delude yourself that expensive is better or the extra money will be in the product instead of the shareholders pocket.

  7. Sea "Dragon"? honeypot? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    Is it just a coincidence that data on Sea "Dragon" is being reported as stolen by China? If you were to bait a hook for a Chinese hacker, might you consider adding "Dragon" to the bait?

    1. Re:Sea "Dragon"? honeypot? by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      Lol no.

  8. Sorry guys by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    I needed to do this to get plans detailed enough to be able to finally build 1/32 scale models of yours (cool) secret projects, but I promise not to do it again ok?

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  9. NSA, traitors to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just to remember. There was a time, long ago, when lots of security features were being developed and the NSA and other US security agencies intervened to make that more difficult.

    • Export restrictions on security features so that all software had to be developed in an insecure version, with maybe a bit of time spent on a secure version.
    • Backdoors so that everything was inherently insecure and overcomplicated.
    • Failing to tell companies about vulnerabilities so they continued to develop insecure software.
    • Failing to tell the public about insecurities so they continued to be unable to choose the more secure software.
    • Arresting the ethical and uninterested hackers so nobody made the public care about security.
    • Most of all, failing to insist that the software developed for government was secure so that nobody bothered.
    • Interfering with the popularity of projects like FreeS/WAN instead of making them mandatory.

    Now, when Trump starts some needless, stupid war against China, many American servicemen's lives will be lost because the NSA failed to do it's basic job - secure the communications and information of the USA. Or more likely, worse, the Chinese will feel bold enough to close off free navigation through the south China sea and eventually be powerful enough to destroy the US economy.

    It's not that they weren't warned. They still did it and there are still traitors demanding backdoors in encryption.

    1. Re:NSA, traitors to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just the NSA? Not the politicians that empowered, funded, and wrote laws to help them to do just exactly what they did?

      The one thing I have learned from American politics is that the Politician has never done any wrong. The agencies they create became corrupt, the lobbyists they entertain are the evil ones, the laws they create and establish are bad, and the businesses they rub elbows with are pure trash... but the Politicians themselves? Pure saints, in fact the vast majority of Americans are going to vote in another saint (depending on their party affiliation) in the next election by a large majority.

      The tribalism is still going strong and blame shifting seems to only pick up speed!

    2. Re:NSA, traitors to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just the NSA? Not the politicians that empowered, funded, and wrote laws to help them to do just exactly what they did?

      I'm sure they were complicit. However I'm also sure they didn't understand shit. Basically, whatever the NSA told them they did because they knew no better. If they had told the politicians to start arresting Microsoft engineers over security breaches until they start coding right, the politicians wold have done that. If they told the politicians to reboot their PCs whilst holding the mouse button, the politicians would have done that. What they never did was tell the politicians that the safety of the computers of the civilians of the USA and elimination of any types of backdoors should be priority number one.

    3. Re:NSA, traitors to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shadow government that really runs everything ARE traitors. We need to sharpen our guillotines.

    4. Re:NSA, traitors to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can sharpen them all you want, Trump's handlers in Moscow aren't going to be extradited to the US...

    5. Re: NSA, traitors to the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame the unions for the ridiculous terms in their contracts. Certainly not management who had nothing to do with signing those contracts. In other news, HR blames terrible existing staff as the reason they can't acquire more loyal staff so they can fire the current wastrels.

  10. Seriously? by Zamphatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a hard time believing that in 2018, the gov't & its contractors, aren't locking down national security military secrets better than this. It's so close to unbelievable to me, that I have to wonder if this is misinformation left on a honeypot server. If the US gov't is really this loose with their classified information at this point in history....

    1. Re:Seriously? by null+etc. · · Score: 2

      Prove to me it wasn't intentional espionage. There's a million ways for a mole to plausibly leak sensitive information without the mole being discovered.

    2. Re:Seriously? by DatbeDank · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a hard time believing that in 2018, the gov't & its contractors, aren't locking down national security military secrets better than this. It's so close to unbelievable to me, that I have to wonder if this is misinformation left on a honeypot server. If the US gov't is really this loose with their classified information at this point in history....

      I tell myself the same thing.
      I'm almost willing to bet this is a honeypot operation and the leaked data is otherwise useless or better yet has faults built in that we can manipulate.

      If not, there better be extreme punishments involved for the contractor in question and it should be through the military court system.

      And how in the hell do they not notice 614 f*cking GIGABYTES of data being transferred? Their sysadmin just sat there and thought, "Derp derp, I wonder who is transferring so much data to IP addresses based in the far east?"

    3. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hard time believing that in 2018, the gov't & its contractors, aren't locking down national security military secrets better than this

      I'm very curious about your expectations. You mention what year it is, so I have to ask: do you expect things to be more locked down in 2018 than in 2008 or 1998? Or less so?

      Or to put it another way: what trends have you observed? Have you seen that everyone is just getting better and better at their game, things just keep getting tighter and more excellent? (And therefore, this news story is a big surprise and disappointment.) Or have you observed greater and greater fuckups, where once-great organizations can't even do the simplest things competently? (And therefore, this news story is just another day in a series of failures, and just another example of the inevitable problems that arise from some foolish polices that everyone had already said were foolish and likely to result in failure.)

      So, I'll spill the beans on what my opinion happens to be, based on trends.

      It's the morning of June 6, 2038 and you just woke up. You're a little late because your phone's alarm didn't go off, because it crashed. You pick up the hot (apparently busy-looping?) phone and hold down the power button and it turns off, then you turn it on again. That's a well-worn button.

      For the next few minutes, you scroll through an agonizingly-long list of notifications. Most of them, you've conditioned yourself into ignoring, but a few stick out.

      Apparently someone helped themselves to your entire checking account balance, but then a few hours later the bank reversed the transaction. This happens every few days, but the annoying thing this time is that you had a recurring payment for a pirate search engine whose payment bounced while your account was empty, so you have to tell the search service to retry the billing. It's ok; they're used to it.

      You've got mail from someone else's mom, where she asks her son if p4ss%w0rd is a good enough password.

      You have a fuckton of spam in your employee account. Turns out it got through the filters because the spammer broke into your company's mailserver and sent the mail from there, which bypassed the filters. You'll be spending 45 minutes deleting all that shit, later this morning.

      In the news.. Air Force One crashed, because they forgot to refuel it. Fortunately, this isn't the first time that's happened and there was a contingency plan. President Pruitt had a parachute and a backup chute, which is good because the main chute didn't work and nobody is quite sure why. When asked, the person who was supposed to pack the chute doesn't remember what happened.

      The reporters were all curious whether or not the nuclear launch codes got lost again, so they just went to some overseas website that keeps track of "the football"'s location in real time. Vice President Cosby remembered to grab the briefcase before he jumped out of the same plane (they were flying together). [Vice President Cosby? Well, yes. Remember that day when some IoT prankster opened every remote-controllable lock in the country and all those people escaped prison? Well, they couldn't re-incarcerate him because the official court documents were long-ago lost in one of the various mass data losses that happen every few months.]

      What other notifications do we have here? Looks like there are some "way to go, dude!" replies to something one of your robots posted on social media last night. Aha, the sex sensors all agreed that you and your wife had satisfied each other, and so that's what they posted. Unfortunately, one of them thought it was capturing a recording of someone's moan and posted the audio along with the sex report (to make it hotter) but it was mistaken. It had actually overheard part of a later conversation you had where you disparaged a coworker (mis-characterizing it because you used the word "fuckwit") so he's pretty butthurt over it and you also violated the s

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does the saying go? Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence? I know people who work for major military contractors, and from the stories they tell, this is not at all a surprise.

    5. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Derp derp, I wonder who is transferring so much data to IP addresses based in the far east?"

      They can rent a server, or a flat with Comcast Business, or leave some tiny computer with 1TB drive somewhere, or get hired by a restaurant and download the data on the linux cash register. Anything but download it straight to Eastern China don't you think?

    6. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can rent a server, or a flat with Comcast Business, or leave some tiny computer with 1TB drive somewhere, or get hired by a restaurant and download the data on the linux cash register.

      Too bad for the Chinese that Bill Clinton wasn't still POTUS because they could just ask him and Bill would just give it to them like he did with classified US missile guidance technology during his time in office.

    7. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there is the obvious corruption possibility where someone makes the data available for hacking for a price. Ooops.

    8. Re:Seriously? by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

      Not saying it definitely wasn't and can't say it definitely was, since none of us have all the information about the situation. I'm just saying that from my view, the gov't would have to be incredibly negligent with their most important secrets for this stuff to just be taken like this, and that really seems incredibly unlikely. After all, anyone who knows a little about security knows they should keep highly sensitive stuff like this heavily encrypted, offline, & with physical access very very limited. I'm sure the gov't & their contractors have good security experts working for them, considering the value of the secrets they're holding.

    9. Re:Seriously? by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

      Excellent point!

    10. Re:Seriously? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Totally believable, 2038 the whole world uses insta-pay, but Americans still write cheques and can't spell it.

  11. "sensitive" not the same as "classified" by david.emery · · Score: 4, Informative

    The rules for protecting Sensitive data are less stringent than for actually Classified data. (And just because some reporter uses the word 'secret', I'm not convinced from this article that the material was actually classified.)

    If classified data was actually placed on a machine that was not properly secured, multiple people should go directly to jail. If this was a breach of a contractor system with 'FOUO' sensitive (but not classified) data, then there's a much higher bar for 'go to jail.' That being said, I'd fully expect there to be substantial consequences against the contractor, up to being kicked off and forbidden to bid on subsequent contracts.

    1. Re:"sensitive" not the same as "classified" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded you up. True classified is much different. A previous contractor I worked for would not even touch storing classified info on computers because of the IT burden to do it within regulations.

    2. Re:"sensitive" not the same as "classified" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The data stolen was of a highly sensitive [but not classified] nature... the material, when aggregated, could be considered classified..."

    3. Re:"sensitive" not the same as "classified" by rworne · · Score: 2

      An article I read called the data "sensitive", which in itself does not mean anything.

      What I gleaned is that the data was unclassified, but when aggregated together, classified information can be gleaned from it.

      You seem to have the idea, but for the sake of others here, this is an example that is not a car analogy:

      Materials A & B, processes C, C', & C'' and product D are all unclassified

      Which process you use affects the end quality/effectiveness/cost of D.

      So we have a list of studies on A and B on the server, with D being the desired result. Some process studies over C, C' and C'' and a bill from accounts payable for purchasing equipment to manufacture unspecified items via process C that coincide with the lifecycle of the contract to manufacture D. With all that together, we know what limitations are on D and can work on effective countermeasures.

      This is what the stink is about.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    4. Re:"sensitive" not the same as "classified" by david.emery · · Score: 2

      And that's a real issue with technical data like this. On the one hand, there's the risk of aggregation that yields classified results. That would in theory make the system holding -all that data (or a set of systems that can be 'joined' to yield the result) classified. On the other hand, there's the problem in deciding just how much aggregation yields a classified result, and then the consequences of -making that decision-. Working in a classified environment is hard (costly and very inconvenient), there's a definite incentive to avoid that if you can. (Also, the consequences if the data on your computer is decided post-facto to be classified, e.g. because of this aggregation or because it was previously mis-assessed, is a REAL PAIN IN THE ASS. They take your computer away, and you do good it get anything back from it by the time they're done assessing and then sanitizing it. Fortunately, never happened to me, but happened to co-workers.)

    5. Re:"sensitive" not the same as "classified" by Kjella · · Score: 1

      And the alternative is...? I seem to remember a case I read once but somebody (given the time frame, probably the Russians) was collecting data on overtime pizza delivered to intelligence agencies. And I can sorta understand that, every time they discovered something big you'd have people working around the clock to figure it out. I can understand why you'd want to keep that a secret, on the other hand it's really hard for accounting and everyone else to pretend it didn't happen.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:"sensitive" not the same as "classified" by david.emery · · Score: 1

      We had discussions in my (nuclear-capable) National Guard artillery unit (during the Cold War, when every artillery unit trained for that mission) whether the Chaplain's Visitation Schedule should be classified, because it might reveal the location of the firing batteries.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. doesn't pass the smell test by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "614 gigabytes" " in January and February"

    So they were exfiltrating 10 Gigabytes a day from the contractor's network and nobody noticed?!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The part that struck me as ludicrous was the "secret plans to develop a supersonic anti-ship missile for use on U.S. submarines by 2020".

      You can't get a new stove approved for submarine use in two years, much less develop and certify a new missile....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      The USA has had torpedo tube launched anti-ship missiles for decades.

      Ours pop out of the water, the Russians create a bubble in front of theirs and haul ass in the water. Ours can turn.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      The USA has had torpedo tube launched anti-ship missiles for decades.

      Yeppers. And the process for developing & approving a new one takes longer than two years. MUCH longer than two years.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "614 gigabytes" " in January and February"

      So they were exfiltrating 10 Gigabytes a day from the contractor's network and nobody noticed?!!

      This is why we need data caps.

    5. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      They included all the Microsoft updates for Windows 10....

      A plot to get China to install Windows 10 on their subs to weaken them. Brilliant!

      (IKWYRM)

    6. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Updated blocks on the other hand...development of an updated version in four years isn't insane. Especially as we don't know how far along the development is.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

      The part that struck me as ludicrous was the "secret plans to develop a supersonic anti-ship missile for use on U.S. submarines by 2020".

      You can't get a new stove approved for submarine use in two years, much less develop and certify a new missile....

      If there was 617 GB of data sitting there to be pilfered, they must have been working on it a good while.

    8. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So they were exfiltrating 10 Gigabytes a day from the contractor's network and nobody noticed?!!

      Yeah. That's an average of 121 KBytes/second.

      Would you notice that snuck in with the half million other bits of software that transfer data over HTTPS (aka: the Universal Firewall Bypass Protocol) to a globally diverse variety of ever-changing machines all damn day?

      I wouldn't!

    9. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      So they were exfiltrating 10 Gigabytes a day from the contractor's network and nobody noticed?!!

      No problem: sneak one 256 Gig microSD card per day for 3 days.
      Maybe stuck it up his ass.

    10. Re:doesn't pass the smell test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And which are supersonic?

  14. Sensationalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Important info goes in a scif which is air-gaped. Either the info was unimportant, or contractor not adhering to requirements, or buyer didn't require them to maintain a scif(low bid winner exclusion?)
    The details matter here.

  15. don't wory they will get pardoned for $$$ by kiviQr · · Score: 2

    just line up and pay $1bln you will go back to doing business as usual

  16. Sounds fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonimous officials say that some data that cannot be disclosed has been stolen from a contractor which will not be named. This smells o fake news a mile away

  17. Blind Man's Bluff by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

    If you want to know a lot about development of nuclear submarines and assorted espionage (mostly Russia/US though), look up Blind Man's Bluff on Amazon. Great book.

    --
    "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    1. Re: Blind Man's Bluff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the most jaw dropping books I've ever read. It's shocking what goes on in the depths of the ocean.

    2. Re: Blind Man's Bluff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a little bumping and rubbing is all. One would see more exciting stuff on the NASCAR track, should one be able stay awake for it.

      It's not like a US fast attack submarine has ever collided with a Russian Delta IV boomer.

  18. AyePhone X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... by PIRATES! Arrr!

  19. go ahead and post them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will help the Korean and Japanese navies against China.

  20. Controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure why strict IP address controls are not being implemented here.

  21. what does Apple do? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I mean we read stories all the time where military secrets are stolen all the time and yet it seems like Apple's biggest secrets are never leaked. Maybe they are and maybe most of us can't recognize these, just me asking. Trump has advantage that if any of his secrets are stolen (probably of bankrupt value) or disclosed he can simply shout "fake news" and it's end of discussion.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:what does Apple do? by 8086 · · Score: 1

      I've looked at Apple's biggest secrets and there really aren't any bigger secrets in there than just good engineering and good UI design.

    2. Re:what does Apple do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's biggest secret. Just copy Android and charge more money.

  22. China's BIG military weakness = naval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & they are after ANYTHING they can steal there (which IS all they do: China imitated me http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/

    * Naval warfare is how/where the USA would CHOKE THEM OFF & they know it - so they attempt to shore that weakness up via thievery, clearly.

    APK

    P.S.=> I used to respect the Chinese until I saw all the crooked thieving they pull especially in tech (& I used to think they were an "honorable" people - yes, there's good Chinese individuals though admittedly (too bad rotten ones, like they do for any race/culture, make their entire country look bad))... apk

  23. Any evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or just baseless accusations and propaganda as usual?

    1. Re:Any evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the 600 GB of information going to Chinese IP addresses was a clue? Why in the world this info wasn't on an isolated network or China geoblocked from their firewall escapes me. I guess that happens when the sysadmin gets his job based on who he knows rather than what he knows.

  24. easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just give these guys a shitty internet connection like mine. With this upload I would take ALL of Jan + Feb to steal half of that LOL

  25. Uhhhh by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    The Washington Post agreed to withhold certain details about the compromised missile project at the request of the Navy, which argued that their release could harm national security.

    Yeah, it might get out to the Chinese.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  26. Better call NCIS by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Get Gibbs and his team on the case, track down them wily Chinese operatives pronto!

    Really, is anyone even surprised at any of this shit anymore? Everything is hackable now, nothing is safe. Remember that at least half of us has had ALL of their financial data stolen from them in the Equifax breach, and by now there's probably a million copies of all of that floating around the world. Meanwhile dickheads in the EU and corporate assholes here in the States are more concerned about 'losing profits to piracy' and will completely ruin the Internet, turn it into a read-only 'service' (like Cable TV, just stupider) in order to accomplish that, and why the ever-loving fuck should they care that there are criminal and military assholes out there that will hack the shit out of our infrastructure (electricity generation, water, natural gas, water service, nuclear reactors, and so on), rob our banks blind, and steal every military and state secret we've got? Doesn't make them money to give a shit about any of that now does it?

    Things have got to change.

    1. Re:Better call NCIS by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Everything is hackable now, nothing is safe.

      Particularly if it is Windows.

      Things have got to change.

      Installing or using Windows in government should be a firing offence.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  27. doesn't pass the porn test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course. Blended right in with the porn browsing.

  28. Navy should have ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

    The Washington Post agreed to withhold certain details ... at the request of the Navy ...

    ... requested this of the goddam contractor.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Navy should have ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newport RI? It's got to be Electric Boat, they're the biggest contractor up there.

  29. Windows by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Go ahead, tell me it's not Windows. Basically, Microsoft threw an election to Trump and national security to China.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  30. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we store ANYTHING offline anymore? Russia switched back to physically typed pages for gods sake.

  31. Well, there's yer problem by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    FTFA: The data stolen was of a highly sensitive nature despite being housed on the contractor’s unclassified network.

    You've got to assume that anything on a system that's attached to the internet is going to be compromised sooner or later.

  32. Verification of a Purchased Product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are just kidding ourselves here.

    China most likely already paid the "unnamed contractor" cash money for the plans, long ago. They just "hacked" this data to confirm the goods they bought were the real deal (or better yet, to confirm they received ALL the plans for ALL the bells and whistles that were paid for. Even China knows you can't trust those unnamed contractors.).

    And for goodness sake. What is the name of the contractor they pilfered this from? The list can't be more than a dozen or so multi national corporations. Why not make it widely available to the public?

    How many corporations are involved in the development of submarines? Not many. A quick google search will show these corporations are selling this technology to our "allies" left and right. Corporations that are supposedly aligned with the United States agenda sell us out all the time (by us I mean.. the average U.S. taxpayer).

    If the people that run these corporate monstrosities were as patriotic and loyal to the United States as they would have the public believe,
    they wouldn't squirrel their money away in tax havens. They would pay their damn share of taxes to help improve the state of our society. They certainly wouldn't always sell out to the highest bidder, because, you know, $$$.

    This whole article reeks of a CYA (cover your ass) type of press operation.

    Think about it..

    China is probably about to launch a sub with "super secret" tech that should be completely locked down (as far as the U.S. taxpayer knows).

    In response the soon to be identified contractor's press release will read something like this...

    "Gosh! We here at the global branch of "If the Money is Right, We Sell Anything To Any One - Especially Submarine Technology Corporation (TM)" have no idea how China came into possession of this incredible, super secret, highly coveted technology". "Wink, wink, nudge nudge."

    "Must have been a hack! And, um.. no money changed hands. Go ahead. Prove money changed hands. We dare you. We have enough lawyers to drive you into bankruptcy if you try. But clearly NO Money Changed Hands!"

    "Look over there! Celebrity Boobies!"

    Followed by the U.S. Public saying.. "Oh. Boobies! Celebrity Boobies!"
    "Submarine Tech.. wha?"

    In the meantime, it will eventually be shown the contractor built 90 percent of the facilities needed to create this submarine technology in order to
    save money on labor and materials. Then exported it back to the U.S. to be assembled.

    Big multi national corporations have no allegiance to any particular country. Just the bottom line. It's all about the $$.

    At the end of the day, at least the CEO has his Yacht(s).

    And Mansion(s).

    And Jets(s).

    And small Island(s).

    And government official(s).

    And banking/financial officer(s).

    And Insert obscenely gratuitous item here....

    Jeez. I probably should stop ranting now.

  33. Spoke to him (1 of my intellectual heros) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoke to him here directly on /. (1 of my intellectual heros) in 2014 https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5250561&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=47182047/ & he told me to help make the internet a better place? I was already @ it (the entire discussion tree shows that much parent to his reply there & beneath it).

    * :)

    APK

    P.S.=> Great read that book - imo, it ought to be required reading for security pros (can wipe logs all day, try it on a mirrored log AND a printer putting it out on paper the way Stoll did to trap East Germans & KGB w/ evidence they could NOT wipe)... apk

    1. Re:Spoke to him (1 of my intellectual heros) by eneville · · Score: 1

      P.S.=> Great read that book - imo, it ought to be required reading for security pros (can wipe logs all day, try it on a mirrored log AND a printer putting it out on paper the way Stoll did to trap East Germans & KGB w/ evidence they could NOT wipe)... apk

      I agree, it should be required reading, or part of Sysadmin Employee Handbook.

      You can make append only files, FWIW, which could be useful for logging in this way. Nothing stopping someone who gains root from rebuilding the FS though, just gives them another task and need to reboot the system. Printers run out of paper eventually.

      Was a very awesome book, I should read it again.

  34. Two possibilities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. By 'hacked' they meant 'a chinese/chinese american person working at the Contract walked off with a hard drive full of classified information'.

    2. By 'hacked' they mean chinese hackers broke into a weakly secured fileserver connected to the internet using legitimate credentials and appearing as a legitimate user downloaded data at a rate their normal developers use data, not resulting in flagging until an audit period days/weeks/months/years later.

    Either seems plausible, but 'hacked' seems unnecessary.

  35. Re:China's BIG military weakness = naval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More bullshit lies from APK, but that is expected as that is all he can provide.
    Like always his proof does not support his claims but instead makes him look like an idiot.
    He keeps posting the same BS over and over again even when he says has been proven false.
    Must be hard living with severe mental disabilities.

  36. Re:China's BIG military weakness = naval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spamming lying bullshitter APK spams his lying bullshit some more.
    The chinese didn't copy or imitate you they did something completely different that happens to share a trivial simplistic obvious feature.
    LIke cars having 4 wheels obvious and simplistic.

  37. Not unlikely. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I know someone first hand who had been translating plans and manuals for cruise missles for a NATO partner country. That was 3 years before there was an official vote to decide wether these would be stationed or not. In the 80ies the peace movement launched large-scale protests agains the CMs, argueing that they could carry nukes. Which is nigh pointless in such a high precision weapon. Word had it that the peace protests where funded and organised by CIA blackops to make the CMs more scary and have the local gouvernment push through agressively to make them even more scary than they are. And to mislead the public and the enemy about their actual purpose.

    So year, this could be a honeypot / smokescreen. Not unlikely.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  38. Date of the article proves differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Date of the article link I posted proves differently (since I publicly released the Win32/64 model LONG before) & I do FAR more than YOU or "your kind" (UNIDENTIFIABLE do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells") do - & you're MORE THAN WELCOME to show you have done more & better + earlier (you never do because you haven't & NEVER WILL - you just "hide" + STALK/HARASS me like the pussy punk you are).

    * OTHERS SEE YOUR BS & SECOND ME ON IT (& I've many more, want to see them too? Ask) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56751614/

    APK

    P.S.=> You're also WRONG - My hosts engine is the ONLY 1 of ITS KIND that does "hardcoded favorites" @ TOP of hosts for more speed vs. remote DNS in resolution of hostnames to IP address that also secure you vs. DNS security issues (dns poisoning redirects) & tracking on dns request logs... apk

    1. Re:Date of the article proves differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you do is trivial and obvious, so much so that any utility that happens to share a feature is highly likely.
      Just like with the chines who actually did something unique unlike your work.
      Now you are mad and going to throw a fit, maybe I can find your pacifier to calm your tempter tantrum.
      You don't like it when people tell the truth about you and your work and claim that they a liabling you just like all scammers.

  39. LOL! YOU don't do anything @ all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL! YOU don't do anything @ all (prove you have, you never do since you = a ZERO "ne'er-do-well" JEALOUS jowie you are by unidentifiable ac posts).

    * Don't YOU have ANYTHING BETTER TO DO but STALK ME (obviously PROJECTING you = "AnGrY" (@ yourself do nothing)) like the "ne'er-do-well" DO NOTHING Jealous JOWIE (lol) you clearly are?

    APK

    P.S.=> Evidently you don't & you don't have the SKILLS to create something our /. peers & LIKE + USE now multiplatform (even in an older lesser model soon to be improve in Win64 too) https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12209260&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=56754750/ that yields more speed/security/reliability for less (bugs/security issues/resource use) vs. any "so-called 'competitor'" (souled out useless OR buggy + inefficient) ... apk

  40. No lies @ all w/ proof (on U too)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On & your WASTED unidentifiable anonymous "ne'er-do-well" do nothing LAZY unskilled ass https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12209612&cid=56755082/ & also about CHINA doing what I did (only hosts program that does hardcodes for faster & safer than remote DNS resolution in GUI too) https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12209612&cid=56755082/

    * Don't YOU have ANYTHING BETTER TO DO but STALK ME (obviously PROJECTING you = "AnGrY" (@ yourself do nothing)) like the "ne'er-do-well" DO NOTHING Jealous JOWIE (lol) you clearly are?

    APK

    P.S.=> Evidently you don't & you don't have the SKILLS to create something our /. peers & LIKE + USE now multiplatform (even in an older lesser model soon to be improve in Win64 too) https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12209260&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=56754750/ that yields more speed/security/reliability for less (bugs/security issues/resource use) vs. any "so-called 'competitor'" (souled out useless OR buggy + inefficient) ... apk

  41. Nothing stops Root from resetting append by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing stops Root from resetting append access only (I do it in the program I noted to Mr. Stoll himself during the File Open (as append, reset etc.)/Read-Write/Flush-Close cycle either really IF you think about it...

    Now, I hate getting "radically creative" minus some proof of doing it but a DRIVER LEVEL/KERNELMODE exe could do ANYTHING IT WANTS (even piercing OOP protections) since it can 'see' (even touch) pretty much ANYTHING it wants (why keyboards work so fast for example from 1 driver level exe) & userlevel MAC restrictions don't take there (hell, I did it in the program above where Linux puts restrictions on ping exe that way, but NOT the TCP/IP stack @ API levels (that's still CLEAN, cleaner in RAW than WinSock2 imo in fact)). ... & the paper running out was a good point from you though (so put a MOUNTAIN of it there, right? Right...).

    * In any event, it was a GREAT book that my father (of all people, not computergeek, but a Tool & Dye Maker/Designer) gave me to checkout & told me "This'd be up your alley & it's good" (glad he did - he's a very avid & varied reader).

    APK

    P.S.=> On the note of Root/Admin/SuperUser access - that's WHY the printjob (probably direct pipe changing default output device from console monitor to printer device (all a fax program really is too IF you think about it - just another file abstraction you scribble on)) was so smart imo - & obviously unexpected on the EastGermans & KGB's part (like the student model of an ALTERNATE logging system he had the students write up the year before - "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth", anyone?) - & lastly thank YOU for a civil decent reply (other ones I did here are my "troll do nothings" stalking me as always, lol)... apk

    1. Re:Nothing stops Root from resetting append by eneville · · Score: 1

      Nothing stops Root from resetting append access only (I do it in the program I noted to Mr. Stoll himself during the File Open (as append, reset etc.)/Read-Write/Flush-Close cycle either really IF you think about it...

      Same goes for diverting where the print goes. Difference is though, if both are attacked, you have some chance of grepping the logs, grepping print output takes a much longer as eyeballs don't work as fast. This assumes you can do something with it afterwards. On a laser, I'm not sure, but if you close the print fd file, I think it ejects the page. On line printers, this isn't as much an issue. If there is a large (page) buffer, then I think there's some chance that the lpd could be -9'd thus nothing gets written. Obvious when the admin gets in, but was damage done in the meanwhile? To be honest, I'm more bothered about dormant intrusions, those that are immediately obvious are less of a problem as you can deal with those.

      My hints were towards https://man.openbsd.org/OpenBS...

      I'd have more confidence in that than other methods. Granted you have to reboot to rotate, but it seems a fairly good compromise and has a lower carbon foot print than the paper method. There may also be times when the log buffer fills waiting for the printer to warm up and some connections may time out, though I've never checked this, would be mighty annoying if you cannot ssh to quiet machine because the log write hasn't returned.

  42. easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just threaten them with sanctions and copyright laws and they'll return data promptly..