Slashdot Mirror
BlackBerry Key2 is the 'Most Secure Android Smartphone', Company Claims (betanews.com)
The Key2 smartphone, which BlackBerry unveiled earlier this week, is the "most secure Android smartphone," the Canadian company claims. Brian Fagioli, writing for BetaNews: While BlackBerry no longer makes smartphones, it does license its name to a company called TCL which makes Android devices that carry the branding -- and sometimes, a physical keyboard. It isn't just slapping the BlackBerry name on a random low-quality Android phone, however. Actually, these TCL devices have been fairly well received thanks to an adherence to traditional BlackBerry designs. Today, TCL unveils its latest such smartphone, called "KEY2," and it looks quite nice. In fact, the company says it is "the most secure Android smartphone."
Blackberry: "We have the most secure Android smartphone."
Hackers: "Challenge accepted"
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
But literally the lowest bar you have to overcome. Skinniest obese kid, congrats.
First, TCL+Blackberry=Blackberry mobile.
Blackberry mobile is one of the few android makers (if not the only one) which assigns a crytpo key *in hardware* to each device to protect it from tampering in the field. They do not use a Vanilla linux kernel, instead opting for a Hardened linux.
Running Snoopsnitch reveals a very, very green field, meaning that all the patches are "really" applied. And not like some other android phones, which report a patch level, but in reality do not apply the fixes...
It also has an app called DTEK, which lets you see in depth what your apps are up to.
More info in this old but still relevant article:
https://www.engadget.com/2015/...
Of course, if you do not want a PKB, then you are equaly (or more) secure, and have a longer SW support with an iPhone.
*** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
Maybe it is the most secure, but no one will ever know.
Call me when its app security allows disabling network access when I am not manually running the app
Call me when app permissions has option to provide fake location, contacts, storage, etc so apps will still run but not have access to real data
People have very short term memory, it's like this never happebed at all ever:
https://www.theverge.com/2016/...
Both are equally insecure. When the owner of the device isn't the one in control of the security landscape then the OS itself is malware.
Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
Some of us like physical keyboards you insensitive clod!
I have a TCL television, and when it's connected to the internet, it used screenshots of whatever youtube video I'm watching to serve up ads on the TV. It was so annoying that I stopped using the built in Roku component of the TV. I'm willing to concede that it might be the Roku side of things, and not the TCL side, however it does leave a layer of skepticism.
Well, yes, adenoidal teenagers think this whole thing is a giant game of capture the flag FTW!
But real security is a complex economic trade-off between the cost of the attack, the value of the attack, and the law of supply and demand (one corner of which concerns the long-term warehousing of former teenagers who outlived their long-arm-of-the-law immortality halo).
Challenge accepted by the Red Bull movable feast of the socially naive with mad hacking skilz and dark horse omenz to parlay into the Forty Year Old Virgin's tragically unhip middle-aged, free-society business acumen.
It wasn't Blackberry that set you back 10 years, it was whomever decided to go with the wrong device for your needs that did.
There are those for whom the physical keyboard or other Blackberry features are still a best fit.
Who's CEO argued phones having backdoors was a good thing? No thanks, you're the last group of people I want anywhere near my data.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
About security, or BlackBerry.
That's not always the case. How many users do you know that turn off firewalls and disable scans on their desktop because it "slows down everything"? In Corporate IT, it happens a lot. If you were right, users, not tech suppliers would be in control.
In the consumer world, we leave it to our suppliers to take those precautionary steps for us.
In Apple's case, security is equivalent to privacy, even from them.
However, if google knows where you are, or can serve up more relevant ads (and in some cases, results), and they don't see this as a security issue. After all you aren't losing anything. When you go to Google Search and you search for an error message when troubleshooting, your location doesn't matter. When you search for restaurants serving Sushi, it does. Yet every time, google ask you where you are.
Apple see this as invasion of privacy, and insecure. Google see this as better service delivery (which includes "relevant" ads).
As far as Blackberry is concerned, security is limited only by which foreign sovereign wants in to your messages and data.
I have been a happy Blackberry user for years.
The BlackBerry Passport is the best phone i ever used, the user experience of the UI and the interactions over the OS (under QNX) are amazing, the physical keyboard is great to with the gesture recognition or whatever they call it, let alone the Hub that should be a standard on every "smart" phone.
I had high hopes for the blackberry OS after the version 10 i still don't understand why they are letting that platform die, they should've opensourced it so people can maintain it and they would still make and sell hardware. it's just sad.
But it's still Android, so it's less secure than the iPhone.
That's what I came to say...