BlackBerry Key2 is the 'Most Secure Android Smartphone', Company Claims (betanews.com)
The Key2 smartphone, which BlackBerry unveiled earlier this week, is the "most secure Android smartphone," the Canadian company claims. Brian Fagioli, writing for BetaNews: While BlackBerry no longer makes smartphones, it does license its name to a company called TCL which makes Android devices that carry the branding -- and sometimes, a physical keyboard. It isn't just slapping the BlackBerry name on a random low-quality Android phone, however. Actually, these TCL devices have been fairly well received thanks to an adherence to traditional BlackBerry designs. Today, TCL unveils its latest such smartphone, called "KEY2," and it looks quite nice. In fact, the company says it is "the most secure Android smartphone."
Blackberry: "We have the most secure Android smartphone."
Hackers: "Challenge accepted"
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
First, TCL+Blackberry=Blackberry mobile.
Blackberry mobile is one of the few android makers (if not the only one) which assigns a crytpo key *in hardware* to each device to protect it from tampering in the field. They do not use a Vanilla linux kernel, instead opting for a Hardened linux.
Running Snoopsnitch reveals a very, very green field, meaning that all the patches are "really" applied. And not like some other android phones, which report a patch level, but in reality do not apply the fixes...
It also has an app called DTEK, which lets you see in depth what your apps are up to.
More info in this old but still relevant article:
https://www.engadget.com/2015/...
Of course, if you do not want a PKB, then you are equaly (or more) secure, and have a longer SW support with an iPhone.
*** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
Maybe it is the most secure, but no one will ever know.
Call me when its app security allows disabling network access when I am not manually running the app
Call me when app permissions has option to provide fake location, contacts, storage, etc so apps will still run but not have access to real data
People have very short term memory, it's like this never happebed at all ever:
https://www.theverge.com/2016/...
Both are equally insecure. When the owner of the device isn't the one in control of the security landscape then the OS itself is malware.
Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
Some of us like physical keyboards you insensitive clod!
Not really, no.
Basic Android is pretty secure these days, with FDE enabled by default. But there is also a market for extra security on top, such as Copperhead OS and Samsung Knox.
Having another competitor in the market is a good thing.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Who's CEO argued phones having backdoors was a good thing? No thanks, you're the last group of people I want anywhere near my data.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/