Slashdot Mirror


Tesla's Autopilot To Get 'Full Self-Driving Feature' In August (reuters.com)

Earlier today, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted that its Autopilot driver assistance system will get full self-driving features following a software upgrade in August. Reuters reports: Autopilot, a form of advanced cruise control, handles some driving tasks and warns those behind the wheel they are always responsible for the vehicle's safe operation. But a spate of recent crashes has brought the system under regulatory scrutiny. "To date, Autopilot resources have rightly focused entirely on safety. With V9, we will begin to enable full self-driving features," Musk tweeted here on Sunday, replying to a Twitter user.

Musk said the autopilot issue during lane-merging is better in the current software and will be fully fixed in the August update. However, it was not clear what self-driving features would be included in the August update. Tesla's documentation on its website about the "full self-driving capabilities" package says that it is not possible to know exactly when each element of the functionality will be available, as this is highly dependent on local regulatory approval.

9 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we get a better law passed to make deceptive quoting and deceptive titles illegal? "begin to enable full self-driving features" is not nearly the same as "get 'full self-driving features'". No wonder the news industry is dying. It's all just bullshit, same as gossip.

    1. Re:Fake News by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The headline is grossly misleading because "feature" is singular. If it had said "features", it would have been less misleading, because people would have immediately realized that there must be multiple parts to full self-driving capabilities, and they're just getting some of them. By using the singular form, the headline is saying that the car will be fully self-driving in August, which is almost certainly far from the truth.

      The fact that you can figure out that the headline is pure B.S. by reading the article doesn't change the fact that the headline is clickbait.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  2. Re:Tesla? LOL! by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tesla has a high rate of recalls compared to other car manufacturers.

    Just because a car maker has fewer recalls than Tesla doesn't mean their cars have fewer issues. It just means they don't have as many recalls. They could simply be not taking responsibility for their problems compared to Tesla.

  3. Re:Tesla? LOL! by Elfich47 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Recalls normally have some sort of government intervention that forces the recall.

    --
    Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
  4. Hey Apple, over here.... by seoras · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This, this is courage.

  5. Re: Suggestion for first feature: by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As opposed to human drivers?

    "Oh we missed 5,000 stop signs today alone. We'll fix it never."

  6. Re:Some partial feature, not full self driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, you can. But you need to start from the other end.

    Start with automatic breaking to avoid hitting obstacles, including pedestrians and bicycles. Get that perfect. Then automatic stopping when the driver falls asleep. Then add automatic take over and stopping if the car starts swerving out of its lane. Add automatic stopping for red light...

    I.e. let the human drive, and the computer monitor ready to take over at a millisecond notice.

    Once all the safety features are working, all you need is to add the GPS subsystem that tells the car where to go.

  7. Re: Tesla? LOL! by triffid_98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry but "squids" negate your entire argument. If you are zipping around people's blind spots in-between lanes of traffic wearing shorts, a t-shirt and a DOT approved helmet I have zero pity for you when you eventually "merge" with a car.

    Even if you are extremely vigilant about checking your corners and adjusting mirrors most modern cars have blind spots.

  8. Re:Tesla? LOL! by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would depend on the business model of the company. Luxury/Sports car makers, will be more likely to do self imposed recalls, because their brand image is based on quality and perception. If they can fix a problem before it becomes an issue, then most likely the customer will not think poorly of the product, and when they get a new one, they will more likely go with the same company again.

    If you are getting a more budget practical car, having a hinge fall of, or a wobbly sun-visor isn't a safety issue, and chances are the customer will not be loyal to that brand as much as the luxury makers. Sure my last two cars were Toyota's however there isn't anything wrong with my next car being a Honda, or some other brand. Being that I expect a particular build quality, which isn't fine tuned, but just acceptable and reliable.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.