Slashdot Mirror


'Waluigi Was Robbed and Humiliated by Nintendo' (washingtonpost.com)

Gene Park, writing for The Washington Post (shared by numerous readers): In the Nintendo universe, Waluigi is supposed to be as villainous as his cartoonish mustache and perpetual frown would suggest. But what made him that way? Perhaps it is Nintendo's insistence on humiliating the character in front of his friends and the general public. On Tuesday for the Electronic Entertainment Expo, Nintendo announced new details on the much-anticipated Super Smash Bros. Ultimate for its Switch console. The 25-minute presentation was long on details. For one thing, the latest game includes every single playable character in the fighting-game franchise's 19-year history. It seemed to exceed fan expectations, except for fans of the meme-ready Waluigi. Waluigi, again, was snubbed by Nintendo. He will not be a playable character in the new game.

Waluigi has traveled a long road. Once he was hated by Nintendo fans, who listed him highly among gaming's most annoying characters. His origin story is unimpressive. Waluigi is simply a bizarro version of Mario's less famous but more charming brother Luigi. In his 18-year existence as a minor character, he's had virtually no back story. But that blank canvas ended up becoming Waluigi's greatest gift. Since he stood for nothing, supporters could project their wildest hopes unto him, like Barack Obama in 2008 but actually good at golf. He can be described in a single website as anyone from a "true nowhere man" to "the logical end point of capitalism" and the "triumph of capital over creativity." In other words, Waluigi became the perfect meme fodder.

88 comments

  1. ummmm....... by rockout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what the hell is this??

    --
    I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    1. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      waaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!

    2. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slow news day

    3. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what a soyboy trantrum looks like.

    4. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Journalism in 2018.

    5. Re:ummmm....... by rockout · · Score: 5, Informative

      Life must be difficult when you're reduced to posting political opinions in a story about Waluigi.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    6. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave's not here man.

    7. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else do you explain this story being posted to a liberal newspaper and then making it to Slashdot by way of a liberal editor? This isn't news, it's the delusions of a very sick mind.

    8. Re:ummmm....... by Train0987 · · Score: 0

      They're quoting the Washington Post.

    9. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberalism is a mental disorder.

      So is being an asshole, and advocating a society of assholes.

    10. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      msmash.

    11. Re:ummmm....... by arth1 · · Score: 0

      No, being an asshole is not a mental disorder, it's an evolutionary advantage, as long as it's no more assholey than will be tolerated by others. You exist because some of your ancestors were assholes who stole someone else's food, or screwed someone else's spouse.

    12. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot, obviously. Are you confused by the fact that there isn't a mod posting anti-POTUS retardation? I think that is definitely a little different for the new slashdot. I thought that was going to become one of our new things.

    13. Re: ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an idiot is an advantage too. Just don't expect any respect.

    14. Re: ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed

    15. Re:ummmm....... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      what the hell is this??

      I would click the link but I can't read it.

    16. Re:ummmm....... by pots · · Score: 1

      And... ? You have some weird-ass conspiracy theory about the Washington Post and Waluigi and Liberalism and mental disorders?

    17. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You exist because some of your ancestors were assholes who stole someone else's food, or screwed someone else's spouse.

      I also exist because for countless thousands of years humans have lived in groups where they all pitched in to maximise the survival of its members.

      You know, society.

      Now we've been reduced to the idea that rich assholes are out to lower the taxes for their rich asshole friends, so they can become even bigger and richer assholes -- and that somehow this is an evolutionary imperative.

      Stop pretending humans would exist in our current form if we didn't form strong bonds and pitch in to help as many people survive as possible.

      People who decry any form of society looking out for all of its members are basically advocating the idea that being a selfish bastard is going to work in the long run.

      Talk to us when you or one of your loved ones is suffering from a disease that in other parts of the world healthcare would treat without bankrupting you. Then see if you think being a selfish prick is a good evolutionary strategy.

      Me, I'm glad I live in a society in which things like healthcare are considered basic human rights, and not a profit centre for some greedy multinational corporation.

    18. Re: ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get it, you aren't. So therefore everything liberal == bad.

      Fucking sissy. Man up, grow a pair, and turn off the god damn msm.

    19. Re: ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't live in America.

    20. Re:ummmm....... by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      The summary seems to speak favorably about liberalism by comparing Waluigi with Obama, but then it also notes Waluigi has a lack of an individual identity.

      I am glad the Obama folks are picking up on the way liberalism grooves away from having a personal identitiy.

      To me there is no greater gift given to human than the possibility to become a self. To have a self. As suicides increase and governments expand, I get the sense that this option becomes more and more eclipsed to people -at least in terms of what they readily perceive.

    21. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...luigi

    22. Re: ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I am too, I just don't get sensitive about it.

    23. Re:ummmm....... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Gotta earn his potato vodka somehow.

    24. Re:ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK didn't post that. He has been busy today spamming.

    25. Re: ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get it, you aren't. So therefore everything liberal == bad.

      Fucking sissy. Man up, grow a pair, and turn off the god damn msm.

      He's not.

      Not everything "liberal" is bad. But liberalism is. Today it's a mentality anchored to the idea that everyone and everything should be free and open and loved and accepted, except for anyone or anything that disagrees with you in any way. They're evil, hateful, -ist, bigot nazis who need to be deplatformed, assaulted, fired, imprisoned, etc.

      To hold the hypocritical and logically inconsistent views many on the current left show, you have to be mentally impaired. The great part is that they're crumbling all around us. When one of them steps a toe out of line the others attack, pushing them out and eroding their platform just a bit more so that someone else's toe is sticking out. In the end there will be the one, true, capital L Liberal standing alone on a pillar or arrogant, false virtue.

    26. Re: ummmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously know nothing of America.

      It was all communal before the '80s.
      Globalization killed us, we were right to run and form our own nation we just couldn't keep the world out forever.

      Oh well, good thing we are heavily armed. Come and take it like we did, we want you to now.

    27. Re:ummmm....... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      How is this piece of binary thinking modded insightful?

      You know, society.

      Yes, and that is important too. It's not an "either/or" thing. The genes have the highest chance of propagating when the individual manages to find an equilibrium between altruism and selfishness, not when he or she is on either end of the spectrum.

      In general, "and don't get caught" is a useful (but certainly not the only) qualifier. I'm quite sure that both you and I are products of many instances of cheating, and there are probably quite a few thieves and murderers back in the genetic tree of ancestors too. What they did paid off, else we wouldn't be here.

      However, being so much of an asshole that people take extra precautions and you do get caught or ostracised is not useful.

  2. Deal with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize this is a dumb Internet meme and no one actually cares about this in the slightest, right? Congratulations, msmash, you have been trolled. You have lost. And it's all on the front page. Have a nice day.

  3. You can't please everybody, so why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They bring back ALL these characters into one massive game and people are whinging about Bomberman? Waluigi??

    At what point is this just being a whiny bitch? I'd like to know

    1. Re: You can't please everybody, so why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure this is it actually

  4. Really? by theurge14 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this really a Slashdot post?

    1. Re:Really? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Truly. If they are this desperate to get posts up now, I predict a chapter 11 can't be far off.

    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, it's a Washington Post article.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to watch the Washington Post completely lose their minds. Highly entertaining.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Slashdot is a property of someone else. I remember it being Dice at some time, maybe it still is. If the crop of admins and corporate sockpuppets are unable to maintain advertising revenue through this site, either they will be replaced or the site will be part of some convoluted corporate resource exchange (like the announcer[?] Disney traded beside a pile of cash for an old IP that someone else had gotten ahold of).

    5. Re:Really? by dohzer · · Score: 1

      June Fools! Punk'd!

  5. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? How? Who? What? This articles existence has me very confused. I thought this was a news site.

  6. ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot sinks to new article lows as brits struggle to monetize ad reveue

  7. so yeah........ by lengel · · Score: 1

    Let alone Slashdot covers this, but did the Washington Post seriously dedicate column inches to this?!!!!!!!

    1. Re:so yeah........ by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Sure, why not? Everything else was boring.

    2. Re:so yeah........ by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Let alone Slashdot covers this, but did the Washington Post seriously dedicate column inches to this?!!!!!!!

      Summer is here, and dries up riverbeds and news. It used to be that newspapers would then post front page material like "Cucumbers are now ripe!" or people's birthdays.

  8. Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo character by Eloking · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the story is on /.

    Waluigi was a dump and uninspiring attempt to give Wario a partner for team game like Tennis. But, honestly, what a bad attempt that is.

    While Wario did (surprisingly) manage to get some personality and some fanbase, Waluigi was anything except that.

    Like his name, pretty much everything about the character lack imagination and there's no surprise that Nintendo didn't bring him in the latest Smash Bro game. Credit to Charles Martinet though, at least the voice is funny. Still, to this day, Waluigi remain to my eye the most unimportant character of the franchise. In fact, the only thing more unimportant than him is maybe this news.

    --
    Elok
  9. Waluigi killed my father! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .. and stole my lunch money once.

    1. Re:Waluigi killed my father! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waluigi: I am your father!

    2. Re: Waluigi killed my father! by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Waluigi fired the arrow that you took in your knee

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Waluigi killed my father! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO!

    4. Re:Waluigi killed my father! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Search your feelings; you know it to be true!

  10. More relevant: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    A more relevant story, if only from the workers' rights perspective:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/bus...

  11. I also want justice by paulpach · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am with your Gene Park. I also want justice:

    * Jerry should stop bullying Tom
    * Squidward should be granted a restraining order against Sponge Bob
    * Dogs should stop chasing cats
    * Cockroaches should rent their own apartment
    * Bullet ants should dip their butts in anesthesia before stinging a person
    * Someone should tell Gene Park that Waluigi does not actually exist.

    1. Re:I also want justice by Xenx · · Score: 1

      He's a fictional person, but he still very much exists. Saying he doesn't exist would be the same as saying words, music, stories, etc.. all don't exist.

  12. Terminal velocity..? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

    Despite it's fall from quality years ago, apparently slashdot has not yet reached it.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Terminal velocity..? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Heck it is better then some of the stuff that has been popping up. At least it is news for nerds. Heck people debating cartoon characters is the stereotypical nerd.

      Besides why does all the news need to be hard news, why can't we discuss fun topics as well.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Terminal velocity..? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      How can you consider Waluigi's blatant ostracization in the new game a fun topic!! This is tragic!

      All jokes aside, I get why some people would be upset. It isn't front-page newsworthy, but it's a letdown for some people.

  13. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by Eloking · · Score: 2

    While I'm at it, if anyone have some love for Mario Franchise, you have to check this interview with Charles Martinet, the voice of Mario : https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Elok
  14. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surprisingly ?

    Warioland was awesome on the Gameboy and everybody loved that brute.

  15. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waluigi is a patron saint of all neckbearded basement-dwelling Mountain Dew chugging 40 year old virgins.

  16. Show us on this doll where Nintendo touched you by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Waluigi: Caresses entire doll creepily.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  17. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by Volanin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, his name is one of the only redeeming characteristics. In japanese, we have MARIO and RUIGI... and we also have the term WARUI, which means "bad person". So in order to create bad Mario and Luigi, we ended up with WArio (which, when translated, has the charm of the inverted M) and WARUIgi (which is actually an even better fit in japanese, but is unfortunately completely lost in translation).

    --
    If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
    If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
  18. Lost In Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Japanese, the "walui" part of the name (or "warui" depending on romanization method) means "bad" or "evil". A double-meaning which doesn't make it across into English, the result being the English name kind of looks lame.

    At least with Mario, the W in Wario is an upside-down M, so there is some visual connection to the good-bad-reversal or mirroring of this character's traits vs the original. Waluigi doesn't have this direct connection to Luigi in English, and so depends on his link via Wario instead to explain his name.

  19. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Luigi is the second player Mario
    Wario was suppose to be the Anti-Mario
    Waluigi is just the second player to the Anti-Mario character. So he is the Anti-Luigi

    The real issue was Wario. Being an Anti-Mario but not an Evil Villain just an greedy version Mario, kinda of an Anti-Hero. In terms of story that is a fun angle. So it isn't an opposite of Mario, but a twisted version of him. So compared to Mario, Luigi has little in terms of personality so trying to make a twisted version of him to complement Wario just didn't work. It is just a taller Wario.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  20. Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    supporters could project their wildest hopes unto him, like Barack Obama in 2008 but actually good at golf.

    Other than to troll the non-conservative minority here on slashdot, was there a purpose to that statement? I'm surprised it wasn't followed up with a line praising Trump by comparing him to Mario or Kirby.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's literally pulled from the Washington Post article. We all know how much Jeff Bezos loves Trump, right?

      QQ

    2. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Are non-conservatives a minority here? I seem to see conservatives here constantly complaining about the liberal bias of this place.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re: Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Fucking sissy libruls turning our boys into girls.

    4. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone thinks of themselves as being in the 'middle', because everyone wants to think of themselves as 'normal'.

      The extreme liberals see few people to their left (since they're so far to the left themselves) and see many, many people to their right. Hence they think the place is swarming with rightists.

      The extreme conservatives see few people to their right (since they're so far to the right themselves) and many, many people to their left. Hence they think the place is swarming with leftists.

      They're both correct. Everyone here is against you, and will herd you into the death camps at the slightest opportunity. You're fighting for your lives, and every post you make might tip the balance! Fight on, internet warriors! (it's so fun to watch)

    5. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also see about the same amount of complaints about a conservative bias. so maybe the truth is somewhere in between? or is that too sensible and logical

    6. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, liberals just love to celebrate their imagined victimhood.

    7. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Are non-conservatives a minority here? I seem to see conservatives here constantly complaining about the liberal bias of this place.

      And what does Fox News do?

      If they do the exact same, do you think it is because the conservatives are a minority on Fox?

    8. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Do the hosts on Fox News complain about Fox News having a liberal bias? (Honest question because I don't watch it, but I expect the answer is "no").

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    9. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm wrong but I think I know several people who had high hopes for Obama, being very excited with his election to only end up disappointed, calling him "Bush the Third".

    10. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I think I'm missing how that connects to the prior conversation.

      Though I'm kind of one of those people myself, except I never really bought into the hope hype, being more of a wait-and-see type, but I was still unimpressed with what I saw compared to what could've been. More the lack of undoing much if any of the harm done by the Bush administration than the lack of progress beyond the status quo ante. I had thought "hey, maybe things will go back to how they were" at the start, and ended up thinking "well, at least it stopped getting continually worse" by the end.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    11. Re:Welcome Back to DrugeDot 2018 by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Are non-conservatives a minority here?

      Yes, without a doubt. Look at how often front page articles are praising conservatives and/or demonizing non-conservatives. You can find several in any given week. Try to find an article that does the opposite of that; you might come across one in a month. Then go look at the comments here, see which political positions get moderated up and which ones get moderated down. Which ones get a large number of people jumping in stating their agreement with and which ones get a large number of people shouting at them telling them they are stupid for having such opinions.

      I seem to see conservatives here constantly complaining about the liberal bias of this place.

      Conservatives do that pretty well everywhere. They have all the power in the federal government, and who gets the fault for anything that doesn't work? The liberals - even though they have very nearly zero power currently. The next time a democrat senator threatens to filibuster anything we're going to see the GOP go nuclear.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  21. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by ph0rk · · Score: 2

    Still, to this day, Waluigi remain to my eye the most unimportant character of the franchise.

    Worse than $random_toad_02 in New Super Mario Bros.? They simply made different color Toads because they couldn't be bothered to add a real fourth playable character.

    --
    semantics are everything!
  22. Change.org Sign now by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Say no to paywall articles! Especially say no to paywall articles when the summary makes no frigging sense and one would have to click said article to figure out what the hell is going on.

     

  23. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by Ogive17 · · Score: 0
    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  24. Re: Time to grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a female gamer you insensitive clod.

  25. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by GreyWanderingRogue · · Score: 1
    I disagree. I'd wager the primary reason you see him as unimportant is because Nintendo hasn't done anything with him. Including him as a full fledged character would help to do so. Kind of a catch-22.

    I actually really like Waluigi. His character is different from Wario in my mind, in that Wario is a not very good bad guy, while Waluigi is a comically incompetent bad guy. His design is clearly inspired by Snidely Whiplash and Whiplash himself is parodying, but his idiom is more like Wile E Coyote (Waluigi Coyote: Super Genius), Petey Puma, Dark Helmet (Spaceballs) or maybe Strong Bad. Egotistical and full of himself, but ridiculously bad at everything. The type to put on a super hero costume and run off a cliff expecting to fly. He is enjoyable because he gives players an opportunity for some schadenfreude. He fails not because he's unlucky, or because the hero is so skilled, but because he's just terrible. Who doesn't like to think of evil as incompetent, even if it usually isn't in real life. In a game like this, I would like to play him because he would fit with my skill level (I'm comically bad at these games), and would allow me to laugh at myself with a self-mocking Waaaahhh. Ideal for a couch game played with friends where people can laugh and have fun. Personally I've found many intros to games where Waluigi and Wario have my favorite parts (check Mario Golf and Mario Tennis for the Gamecube, for example), which are some of the only times Nintendo has bothered to give him anything to do.

    I do agree his voice is funny, and probably the reason most people who like him are so fond of him.

  26. Dicks out for Waluigi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WAAAAAAEEEH!

  27. Wah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waaaaaah!!!

  28. Re:Waluigi, the rightfully unloved Nintendo charac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never knew. That's brilliant. Unlike the OP article.

  29. It's some kind of code, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every 4th word or 6th letter or something spells a message that makes sense, right?

  30. Awwwwww by mr_resident · · Score: 1

    It's like one of those adorable Family Circus comics when the kid takes over for the day.

  31. is there a plugin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to filter out msmash posts ?