Slashdot Mirror


After a Decade, 77-Year-Old Gets Back $110,000 Lost In 'Nigerian Prince' Scam (kansascity.com)

Slashdot reader grep -v '.*' * shares a surprising story. The Kansas City Star profiles the victim of a three-year con that started with an email to a Yahoo inbox back in 2005. A decade ago, Fred Haines was wandering the Wichita airport looking for a Nigerian man hauling two chests full of cash. After an hour of waiting and asking around, he finally came to the realization that the $65 million Nigerian fortune he thought he was inheriting was not coming after all. What is now coming, though, is the $110,000 he had been scammed out of, thanks to the work of the Kansas Attorney General's Office.

From 2005 to 2008, swindlers hoodwinked Haines, a self-employed handyman in Wichita, into spending thousands in pursuit of an imaginary inheritance from a Nigerian government official -- a con known as the Nigerian Prince Scam. Haines re-mortgaged his house three times in the process. Last year, in a settlement with the Department of Justice, Western Union admitted it knew some of its employees had conspired with scam artists to bilk people out of money and had failed to fix the problem. The company set aside $586 million to create a fund to refund victims across the U.S. and Canada... All victims who'd sent money to hucksters using the service were able to request refunds, but only those who had complained to law enforcement or Western Union were notified directly of the settlement.

"It got to the point where they were showing me that the president of Nigeria had sent me a letter. It had his picture on it and everything," Haines said. "I looked it up on the computer to see what the Nigerian president looked like, and it was him." Once, he received an email claiming to be from Robert Mueller, who was then the FBI director. The email was addressed to Haines, code-name "B-DOG," and it was signed with the FBI's address and official seal. "I wish you can remove doubt and suspicious and go ahead I assured you that you will never regret this fund release," the email said in part.

Haines is one of 344 victims who recovered a total of $1,758,988 through the Kansas Attorney General's office -- though when the office sent out 25,000 letters to possible scam victims, many of them were now skeptical of the promise of unclaimed money, and "Some were even angry when employees called to follow up on those who hadn't responded."

29 of 128 comments (clear)

  1. I guess by oldgraybeard · · Score: 4, Funny

    We from the and government were here to help!
    Is true at times!

    Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      But you didn't catch the "and", and that you wanted we're?

      You annoying plonker. I'd think you're creimer if I didn't know better.

      Just my 2 cents ;)

  2. He doesn't deserve it back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was painfully stupid, gullible, and greedy.

    1. Re:He doesn't deserve it back by marcle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes he was, but even the stupid, gullible, and greedy shouldn't be preyed on by crooks.

    2. Re:He doesn't deserve it back by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I sort of agree, but it is also a form of education and/or natural selection, and the US is already in dire need of both.

    3. Re:He doesn't deserve it back by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My mother falls for the IT scam, but I still can't train her out of it. At least she knows not to give out her bank account number. But a part of her does not want to believe that the nice gentleman who helped her get rid of her viruses was colluding with the guy who asked for her account number, and she flat out told me that she didn't believe me. I told her that there is no company that is going to help her out on her computer for free and that no one knows she when has a virus and will be calling up out of the blue.

      It's really hard to train someone who's elderly to stop trusting people.

    4. Re:He doesn't deserve it back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's really hard to train someone who's elderly to stop trusting people.

      They grew up in a time where trusting people was not normally harmful. Interactions were local. Crooks from the other side of the world did not have easy access to a victim anywhere in the world.

    5. Re:He doesn't deserve it back by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      How is duping a then 67-year-old “natural selection”?

      A 67 year old male can still reproduce, especially if he really does inherit $65M.

    6. Re:He doesn't deserve it back by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is these people that got stung by these nigerian scams aren't sympathetic. See if this was real they were attempting to assist with money laundering.

      I believe that Western Union needing to be held to account for not blocking these transactions when they clearly knew it was happening is appropriate. But I don't have sympathy for these people, in every way they were trying to participate in a criminal act and they got stung because the other side was a fake criminal.

      Helping someone move money out of a country that they themselves can't move out is money laundering. And if it's real and you assist you can be prosecuted and sent to jail for 5 years. But people are greedy and the see this offer and all they see is dollar signs and they don't care that they are violating the law because they think it's not a big deal.

    7. Re:He doesn't deserve it back by geoskd · · Score: 2

      How is duping a then 67-year-old “natural selection”?

      His kids wont get that inheritance...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    8. Re: He doesn't deserve it back by geoskd · · Score: 2

      A "meritocracy" where he turns up as part of the "chosen ones", of course.

      I don't care if I get a vote or not, as long as the stupidest 2/3 of the population don't. In the end, not matter what kind of government there is, I am confident that I will be able to work the system to my advantage, it's just far less work if I don't have to keep compensating for the things that idiotic elected officials keep doing.

      We keep trudging along with democracy as though it were not fundamentally flawed. The basic problem we have today is that the laws themselves are fundamentally corrupt because those that make the laws are corrupt. This is the problem that needs to be solved, but democracy can't solve it because democracy is made up of people who have an average IQ less than 101. These people play unwitting victim to psychological attacks by very smart, but very greedy and corrupt people, and those are the people that get elected. The smart but moral kind wont use those tactics against the stupid electorate because the attacks are themselves immoral, and as such, the only kind of people who can get elected are the absolute last kind of people you want to put in charge of anything.

      The only way that I can think of to remedy this situation is to prevent anyone who is susceptible to these kinds of attacks from having any say in who gets to run things. If that means I have to give up my right to vote then so be it.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  3. Yeah but... by thadtheman · · Score: 2

    what about the money he was promised.

  4. Devi'ls advocate by JustNiz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The money wasn't recovered from the scammers it was paid back by Western Union, which means the real cost will inevitably be passed on to its other customers.

    Doesn't falling for such an obvious con as this become self-inflicted at some point, even if some Western Union staff were duplicitous?

    Although I hate to see anyone scammed out of their life savings, by saying that society will pay to bail out even obviously stupid/self-inflicted actions, is society really sending the right message, or is it just making more people comfortable with not taking responsibility for their own actions?

    1. Re:Devi'ls advocate by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      I personally believe in the principle of free market economics, however you can't for a moment seriously claim that the US is a any kind of example of a truly free market.

    2. Re:Devi'ls advocate by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      The money wasn't recovered from the scammers it was paid back by Western Union, which means the real cost will inevitably be passed on to its other customers.

      Businesses don't work that way. They set prices to maximize profit. If they could be making more money with higher prices THEY WOULD ALREADY BE DOING IT.

    3. Re:Devi'ls advocate by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Read the article again. Western Union was effectively involved in the scam.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  5. I'd like to see more education programs by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    for these kinds of scams. The people fall for them are probably going to exist for a long, long time. Of course, the way you prevent this is to teach critical thinking (yes, it can be taught) and I'm not so sure the powers that be would want that taught. I know the current batch doesn't.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'd like to see more education programs by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Critical thinking" in these cases is nothing more than common sense. No, some foreign royalty isn't going to pay Joe Blow a large sum of money for any reason.

      It only affects greedy people who think there's a pot of gold under the rainbow.

      Let Darwinism take its course. Stupidity should be painful.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re: I'd like to see more education programs by andycal · · Score: 2

      Go to your bank, and request to wire a large sum of money (a few k or more) to another account. You will get questioned "do you know the recipient?" etc, as a safety check to be sure you are not being scammed. I don't think I've ever used Western Union, but if they don't perform the same safety check, they are a part of the problem.

  6. Welp, there's the blueprint for the new 419 scam by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi, we're Western Union notifying you of possible relief. We understand you fell victim to a Nigerian Prince Scam.

    We set aside USD$586,000,000 as a relief fund, and you can claim your portion of it.

    Just send us a $1490 processing fee and we will process your loss.

  7. Re:Clarification please? by oldgraybeard · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Western Union admitted it knew some of its employees had conspired with scam artists to bilk people"

    Just my 2 cents ;)

  8. Re:Welp, there's the blueprint for the new 419 sca by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can call it the “Nigerian Prince Scam Scam”.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  9. BS detection by Gavrielkay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sadly, it is a known fact that the bullshit meter starts to fail in the elderly:
    https://health.howstuffworks.c...

    This is why they are preyed on by utter shitbags who are the real villains in this story.
    The scammers who prey on our most vulnerable and the greedy idiots at WU who helped them should rot in jail in some third world shithole.,

    Say what you want about how it's really their fault and they should have known better. If you're lucky you'll live to be 77+ and you can feel the pain of having earned wisdom only to have it fade away, to have contributed all your life and have it mean nothing. The lack of sympathy in this thread is appalling.

  10. Re: Clarification please? by andycal · · Score: 2

    WU's primary business is transferring money. (Telegrams not much anymore). Their target market is people without bank accounts+credit cards , so not the most financially skilled population.

  11. have to admire... by Tom · · Score: 2

    You have to admire the brilliance that is in this:

    Haines is one of 344 victims who recovered a total of $1,758,988 through the Kansas Attorney General's office -- though when the office sent out 25,000 letters to possible scam victims, many of them were now skeptical of the promise of unclaimed money, and "Some were even angry when employees called to follow up on those who hadn't responded."

    So their response to a scam in which people fall victim to receivein a claim that they have money waiting for them in the mail - is to send them a mail telling them that there is money waiting for them.

    Someone had a very, very big glas of irony the day they decided that.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  12. Fake scams work, for real-life training by raymorris · · Score: 2

    The last two places I worked, corporate security occasionally sent out a "phishing" or scam email. If you clicked the link in the email, you got a page about email scams. Open an attachment in one of the fake scams, the attachment was a reminder to not open attachments.

    If, instead, you clicked the "report this email" button in Outlook, you got a message saying "congratulations, you didn't fall for the scam."

    That seems to work. After the first few emails sent by corporate security, the number of people falling for it dropped significantly.

    Interestingly, this didn't involve your boss or someone from corpsec saying anything to you. Just the questionable email had a link to a page saying you shouldn't have clicked it.

  13. Re:Both are true by TFAFalcon · · Score: 2

    But in this case, the 'cost' will be a one time thing - not a marginal cost increase of the service. So if they increase the price, they will lose money since their market share will decrease - they will still need to pay the settlement amount regardless of the number of new services they sell.

  14. Cashing in by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My local supermarket had a Western Union poster on display at the customer service desk for years. Its background was a map of Africa with Nigeria highlighted, and it advertised a reduced rate on money transfers there. Now my area (Denver 'burbs) doesn't have any unusual concentration of Nigerian immigrants; their only possible reason for the offer was to get a piece of the action.

    Incidentally, the poster pointed out in the fine print that the customer would get less than the going exchange rate by an undisclosed amount, so WU was proactively going for sloppy seconds.

  15. Greedy or desperate by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    We've had multiple economic crashes in the last 50 years that have hit blue collar workers hard. Combine that with the manufacturing base going overseas and these folks are trying to figure out what the hell to do in a country that abandoned them (much in the way you're abandoning them now). You've got guys in their 50s too young for Medicare with health problems that are going to kill them and their wives in the next 5 years. Then you've got these same guys being told Jesus loves them and will provide for them.

    Screw Darwinism. You won't be claiming that in 10-20 years if your job gets offshored and you can't find another and you need a heart splint. You'll do whatever it takes to survive in the limits of your abilities. We're fucking human beings, not dogs. We don't need to eat each other when food gets scarce. We can figure out how to make enough for everyone. That's reason. Use yours. If not the wealthy will come for you in the next 20 years and you'll die just as horribly as the ones you're looking down on.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/