Slashdot Mirror


Sony's PlayStation 5 Will Launch In 2020 Powered By An AMD Navi GPU, Says Report (theinquirer.net)

According to a new report from WCCFtech, citing "sources familiar with the entire situation," Sony's PlayStation 5 (PS5 for short) will launch in 2020 and be powered by AMD's Navi GPU chip. "While it was previously reported that the much-anticipated console will be using AMD's Ryzen CPU tech, it looks like the chip maker will have some involvement in the PS5's graphics chip, too," reports The Inquirer. From the report: The report also suggests this is the reason behind AMD not announcing a new GPU at Computex this year, because it has found custom-applications for consoles a much more financially attractive space. "Here is a fun fact: Vega was designed primarily for Apple and Navi is being designed for Sony - the PS5 to be precise," the report states, right before going on to explain AMD's roadmap for Navi and how it's dependent on Sony.

"This meant that the graphics department had to be tied directly to the roadmap that these semi-custom applications followed. Since Sony needed the Navi GPU to be ready by the time the PS5 would launch (expectedly around 2020) that is the deadline they needed to work on."
It's anyone's guess as to when the successor to the PlayStation 4 will be launched. While the source for this report is seen as reputable in the games industry, last month the head of PlayStation business said the next console is three years off.

95 comments

  1. A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Seems more appropriately named for a Nintendo console.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it sounds like a Netscape thing.

    2. Re:A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a Microsoft console, almost certainly. But each customer is told "they're priority #1, and most of the customization is going to their config". And none of said customers buy it, but they no doubt demand it anyway, as a point of contract leverage.

      At least, it was that way back 5+ years ago... with the last console cycle.

    3. Re: A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And AMD thought they had a Nintendo win too, since they were working on it.. up until the announcement with Nvidia.. whoops..!

    4. Re: A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but does it run Linux?

    5. Re: A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Navis run Copland OS. Or if you are rich Copland OS Enterprise.

    6. Re: A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But will the MLB have a spare slot for a Psyche chip for full range and motion in the Wired?

    7. Re: A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it runs a fork of FreeBSD

    8. Re:A Navi GPU will power a Sony device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Navi is the name for the whole GPU platform following Vega. They won't name the series to match PlayStation or other console market players.

  2. Trusted source? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    WCCF has at best a 50% hit rate on their more speculative claims.

    1. Re:Trusted source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably accurate just from logical deductions. AMD has been powering all the recent console iterations. Intel doesn't seem interested in it. The new Ryzen processors no longer lag behind Intel as much, so there's no reason to switch to someone else. The Vega/Navi GPUs are probably decent upgrades.

      My only question is if it will be a discrete graphics card or a SOC like now?

    2. Re:Trusted source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only question is if it will be a discrete graphics card or a SOC like now?

      I think SOC is the mandatory path.
      leaner design, cheaper and easier cooling, shared ram/vram, simpler thus cheaper motherboard, cheaper cpu and gpu man. costs.

    3. Re:Trusted source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an AC rant to another AC:

      That is not what logical deduction means. That is induction, or a little abduction, but very much not logical deductions. Deduction uses premises to prove something is true, you are reasoning about what is most likely, which is explicitly not deduction.

    4. Re:Trusted source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS4 and XBO both use an AMD APU which is a SoC with integrated CPU,GPU and other things with a *shared* RAM space. The further generations will also go this route.

    5. Re:Trusted source? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      My only question is if it will be a discrete graphics card or a SOC like now?

      Having a discrete GPU means you have the issue of non-unified memory, being able to create buffer that is both host and device accessible rather than having 2 copies and having to transfer over a bus to synchronize them (and choosing appropriate points to synchronize) is hugely advantageous. It's one of the big issues on PC architectures when you want to offload compute (graphics or general purpose) to the GPU. Consoles and most embedded and mobile systems don't suffer this but PCs do - there is of course the CPU/GPU dies that Intel and AMD offer to the PC market that alleviate this but those are relatively low performance compared to the discrete solutions.

    6. Re:Trusted source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep WCCF version of sources intimately familiar with everything. Is some fat geek sitting in the back room making shit up that sounds semi plausible to attract the press. But then I guess it worked as places like Slashdot, inquirer and many others fell for it hook line and sinker.

    7. Re:Trusted source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not necessarily non-unified, but definitely NUMA if it is a unified address space.

    8. Re:Trusted source? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's pretty much a given.

      new consoles will just be.. well duh newer more powerful versions of the socs they have use now.

      it's kinda boring. but there's a lot of people who don't understand how boring it is, like, that it is irrelevant if they call it the PS5 or PS SUPERPRO, or whatever. it really doesn't matter. it will play ps4 games and there will be games that run on both ps4 and ps5.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  3. THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about your breathing.

    Inhale... Exhale... Inhale... Exhale...

    You are now breathing manually.

    Think about your blinking.

    Blink... Blink... Blink... Blink...

    You are now blinking manually.

    Think about your breathing.

    Inhale... Exhale... Inhale... Exhale...

    You are now breathing manually.

    Think about your blinking.

    Blink... Blink... Blink... Blink...

    You are now blinking manually.

    1. Re:THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought about my breathing but Natalie Portman dumped hot grits in my pants.

  4. lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The notion that AMD's semi-custom business is "lucrative" is interesting... The volumes may be more steady, and the NREs may pay for a good fraction of the R&D (or indirectly fund non-semi-custom projects), but the margins are terrible.

    Profitable, sure, after a fashion. But lucrative.. no, not in any conventional sense of the word.

    1. Re:lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Profitable, sure, after a fashion. But lucrative.. no, not in any conventional sense of the word.

      In the "conventional sense" lucrative literally comes from "to profit." Conventionally, and literally, lucrative just means a thing that makes a profit.

    2. Re:lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err...lucrative means something makes a *large* profit (or produces wealth, which means substantial money), not just net profit. Profitable and lucrative may be synonyms, but do not mean the same thing.

    3. Re:lucrative? by rl117 · · Score: 2

      "Lucre" is nothing more than a synonym for "money", or "profit", if something is "lucrative" that means "money-making" or "profit-making". There's nothing "large" or "substantial" about it. It might often be used in these contexts, but that's purely convention in some locales; it's not universal nor part of the definition.

    4. Re: lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S: (adj) lucrative, moneymaking, remunerative (producing a sizeable profit) "a remunerative business"

      Etymology and definition arenâ(TM)t always the same thing.

    5. Re: lucrative? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      "sizeable". Exactly. Lucrative just means making a non-trivial amount (not necessarily lots) of money.

  5. Re: Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you die today.

  6. Re: Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    If you change your definition of "today" to be a period of 6307200000 seconds, you'll get your wish!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  7. Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?

  8. Re: Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trumpies can't possibly count beyond 100, I think you're just teasing the poor retards now.

  9. ALL YOUR PS5 ARE BELONG TO US!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More DRM than ever. Yay!

  10. Re:Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to school, graduating 4th grade isn't a diploma to spew your sorry excuse of anal originated speech.

  11. Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Sony advertises cross-platform-play and still manages to block other consoles with impunity, why give them any more money?

    1. Re:Why bother by Tyger-ZA · · Score: 1

      When Sony advertises cross-platform-play and still manages to block other consoles with impunity, why give them any more money?

      Maybe this is a crazy idea but, we give them money for a gaming console because they make games worth playing on said console. Games that are not available anywhere else.

      Yes I know about the debacle with them forcing you to play Fortnite on their platform if you started the game there, but here's the important bit regarding that game:

      Fortnite IMO isn't that great as a game, and I'd rather avoid playing it than have to wage a personal crusade against a corporation that won't miss my business anyway

      I'd only be ruining my own enjoyment of gaming to be so concerned about Fortnite that I'd willingly miss God of War, The last of us, Wipeout VR etc as a result

      Yes, Sony does deserve the backlash regarding Fortnite, so I'll go right ahead and not play Fornite on their platform

    2. Re:Why bother by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      And the fact that Epic Games are the ones that actually own the Fortnite accounts, they choose (with I'm sure lots of money) to make the PS4 Fortnite accounts locked to the PS4, I figure if you want to blame anyone...

  12. devs have hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or at least emulation systems

  13. I bet the chip name has "AI" or "Blockchain" in it by corezz · · Score: 1

    Anyone taking bets on the name of one or more of their custom chips? You know, to generate buzz by Sony (and every startup today). Some possible candidates:

    AI Emotion Chip
    Blockchain Quantum Disrupter Chip
    Crypto Cybernetics Chip
    Loot Manager Chip
    Procedurally Generated Realtime Engine Chip

  14. Re: KEEP 'EM COMIN', SOYBOY WEASELS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know these modpoints are free right?
    You just have to log in and not be an ass and they hand them out. Or you could be a creative or entertaining ass and still get some points.

  15. Re:I bet the chip name has "AI" or "Blockchain" in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But they already had the Emotion Engine in the PS2 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotion_Engine)!

  16. Re:Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off with trump crap. dont care if you are for or against, just makes you sound stoopid and boring.

  17. This is laughable by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the person who first dug out the specs on the next gen Playstation over two months ago here:

    https://www.semiaccurate.com/2...

    I found this 'report' to be laughable. No it was borderline ignorant and seems to be based on my work, rampant speculation, and a random technical phrase generator. Also do note that the phrase I used in the story was Playstation 5/Next, I did that for a reason.

    So what do we know? Navi is slated for ~Q2/2019, likely early, next year. Lisa Su held one up at Computex during her keynote, this is not a 2020 product, nor is it tied to the Sony roadmap. I won't go into the sheer technical ignorance of these statements, but lets just say that GPUs don't have a >18 month validation cycle.

    As for the bit about Vega being designed for Apple and Navi for Sony, do I really need to comment on that? It sure sounds good if you are at Youtube levels of technical understanding but, well, just thinking about it makes my brain hurt. Go look back at Polaris, the pre-Vega architecture that formed the basis of the PS4 Pro and the XBox OneX, look at the release cycles for those consoles versus the release cycles for the GPUs. See a pattern?

    And delaying the APUs because of a console? Really? You might want to consider the current launch cadence for AMD chips, roughly yearly on the consumer side. The Ryzen 1xxx launched about a year ago, March 2017. Ryzen 2 launched in March of 2018. That puts Ryzen 3, presumably with Navi, when? I guess that is up to Sony, NOT.

    All in all this 'article' makes my head hurt. It is a rehash of technical stupidity and rumors slapped together by someone with no sources, no clue about how things work, and desperate for clicks. (Note: I am often accused of that but my site doesn't have ads, clicks buy me nothing) For once I wish people on the net would just try and logically parse 'articles' a bit before they repeated them as 'truth', the internet is a big, relatively worthless echo chamber for a reason.

                  -Charlie

    1. Re:This is laughable by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Navi is slated for ~Q2/2019, likely early, next year. Lisa Su held one up at Computex during her keynote,

      Correction: she did not hold up Navi.

      It was the 7nm Vega chip that she held up, which is what comes before Navi.

    2. Re:This is laughable by Tyger-ZA · · Score: 1

      As the person who first dug out the specs on the next gen Playstation over two months ago here:

      https://www.semiaccurate.com/2...

      I found this 'report' to be laughable. No it was borderline ignorant and seems to be based on my work, rampant speculation, and a random technical phrase generator.

      While I do agree with you (I found the details about the x86 based PS4 from your site long before anyone else knew anything about it)

      The real problem here is that your superior information / insight is hidden behind a paywall

      It isn't even a relatively affordable paywall that I might feel compelled to pay for once off to find out about this one thing.

      Your $100 per year student subscription doesn't cover your PS5 news article.

      And at $1000 per year, some Muppet is naturally going to pay that fee, make a video with extra speculation to pad it out, publish on Youtube, and contribute to the dumbing down of society in general while hoping to pull in ad revenue.

      I'm not sure how much control you have over this or if it's even a good fit for your business model, but I might be compelled to pay for that one bit of information at a price that doesn't involve choosing between paying the rent or find out about PS5 before everyone else

    3. Re:This is laughable by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      This was confusing shit. What exactly is your prediction for the PS5 release date and specs?

    4. Re:This is laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Release? 2Q 2020, $499 for basic 500Gb version for first six months. After January 2021 Price cuts to $399, but $499 with improved and, in practice, required hardware specs (4T hard drive, Ethernet port (basic model only has 2.4GHz Wi-Fi), etc) Deluxe system with VR Headset will be $799.

    5. Re:This is laughable by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Wow. You weren't kidding
      https://www.semiaccurate.com/s...

      Hopefully groo wander isn't one of those who complain about other sites paywalls

    6. Re:This is laughable by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      WOW, an actual comment thats not about trump, nuggers or immigrants trolling the border ... i'm a bit baffled like "this is our console two years from now, running hardware that will be old by then" LOL i have no idea how consoles EVER succeeded in surpassing pc-game markets well i do actually, its called middle-of-the-bell-curve-marketing so this means RROD on the PS5 , just like the old xbox because it simply got the plastic so hot the connectors plugged out as it bent from the heat ? i mean it's AMD so its gonna be heater included

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  18. Re:I bet the chip name has "AI" or "Blockchain" in by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    Anyone taking bets on the name of one or more of their custom chips?

    Rootkit Management Engine

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  19. Re:I bet the chip name has "AI" or "Blockchain" in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's taken by Intel for their ME.

  20. Re:Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nobody cares what you think either though. That's the impasse we're in, you defending a traitor and me not giving a fuck about what's interesting to you.

  21. Modpoints retained. Post flagged instead. by asjk · · Score: 1

    No text

  22. Without real time ray tracing? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I don't see much of a place for next gen consoles coming out if they aren't going to be capable of ray tracing. The APIs for RT acceleration have already been hammered out and standardized between vendors. We're likely to soon see cards on PCs that do this and game engines that optionally support RT, which greatly improves lighting effects. (ultimately RT is better because global illumination is more realistic to the physics of light than traditionally rendered local illumination)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re: Without real time ray tracing? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      You're getting way ahead of yourself; raytracing won't even begin to really matter until VR has maxed-out raster-based rendering at 8k x 8k per eye with a super-high refresh rate. It's a long way off.

    2. Re: Without real time ray tracing? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      raytracing has nothing to do with VR. it has to do with how you handle lighting and illumination. in fact it's easier to scale raytracing to a lower resolution than a higher resolution. although things like "deep shading" help a lot with RT performance.

      I don't think you'll see VR suddenly take off. That gimmick is over, and those of us that worked on it are going back to R&D mode for another 10-20 years.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re: Without real time ray tracing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his point is that he believes that VR, higher resolutions and higher refresh rates gives more in return than going from rasterized graphics to raytracing.
      Since raytracing is so inefficient and the industry has come up with so many tricks to fake effects which usually require raytracing the gain is rather minimal except for in scenes with lots of extremely shiny materials where those effects can be of higher quality with raytracing.

    4. Re: Without real time ray tracing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You claim vr is a gimmick while you bang on about ray tracing. Do you think the average consumer will be able to tell the difference between ray tracing and raster, other than the fact the raster frame rates will be 10 times faster?

    5. Re:Without real time ray tracing? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I don't see much of a place for next gen consoles coming out if they aren't going to be capable of ray tracing.

      I know. Personally I am not going to buy a faster car until we have achieved faster than light space travel.

    6. Re:Without real time ray tracing? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Aaand no. I mean first of all 4 Voltas were barely able to hit 30 fps at 1080p. This is equivalent to 5.5ish 1080ti's plus additional tensor cores in graphical horsepower. That doesn't even take into consideration 4k adoption rates.

    7. Re: Without real time ray tracing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it is workable now, the only real issues are:

      Cost, can be reduced through mass production and more effecent designs.

      Movement, seriously just give us a thumbstick and be done with it. The teleporting crap is useful in a pinch but it compeletely breaks the experience you're trying to create, which is a big cause of....

      Sickness, that's a harder one. Some people just don't have a good sense of balance and orientation. This can be improved through exposure, training, and adjustment, but most don't want to do that. We used to have handicap options built in to FPSes for inexperienced players, I don't see why the same can't be used here.

      That's really all there is under the current gen equipment. Now, I would say go for the nervous system as the next target, as we have some progress there already. Plus you get the feel good / bragging PR rights for helping the disabled with research and development which any C-Level exec loves making press conferences about.

    8. Re: Without real time ray tracing? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Yes. the environments are more dynamic with RT. Main drawback is you need a monster multi-GPU setup or relatively simple scenes. RT is at a state that professionals can use it today (and do). In a year or two it will be in gamer's systems, as the new Vulkan APIs for RT have hinted.

      There are usability issues with VR today. The screen door effect. Lack of focal range that leads to eyestrain. The problem with users being blind to their real environment that poses a hazard for interactive movement. The amount of space a person needs to play VR. I think AR (augmented reality) and light field displays (or something better?) need to be further along before we see widespread adoption.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  23. Re:Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    dont care if you are for or against

    Why do you hate democracy? Move to Russia with your don't-give-a-fuck attitude.

  24. Yup you are right by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    Yup, you are right, and I was in the audience too. I guess I am still jetlagged. In any case the release cycle of GPUs says that they should have silicon back by now for Navi, or really soon if it is not already in hand. It was originally due in Q4/2018 but it got pushed back earlier this year, my educated guess is because of things on the process side.

                  -Charlie

  25. Retrocompability by Burgergold · · Score: 1

    I just hope they will support retrocompatibility this time My PC games are following me since a long time on Steam. I've kept a few PS2 game for my PS3 and my son DS has... a lot of older NES/SNES/GBA/Genesis retrocompatibility hehe

    1. Re:Retrocompability by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      If you seriously want backward compatibility then you better stick to PC gaming.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  26. graphics chip comps specializing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm, so AMD is sticking to standard, popular video game APIs, and doing volume work for consoles. nvidia is working on GPU 3rd party dev support, good linux drivers, and OpenGL support. So, which company is going to support Apple Desktop, with Metal 3D only? Will Apple use a 3rd party, or roll its own GPU?

    1. Re: graphics chip comps specializing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former AMD employee, I can say apple is a pain in the ass, and no company really *wants* to deal with them. But they have enough volume that one holds ones nose and says thank you for your business.

      AMD is also better at holding it's nose than Nvidia..

  27. Console Lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't make any sense for Apple to buy these things and put them into Laptops, nor for MS, Sony, or whomever else to use them for consoles if they're going to do remote streaming and emulate what Nintendo has done. Energy is king, now, along with a minimum performance spec. Also, why no raytracing? This is the equiv of supporting vector graphics for GPUs in real-time rendering -- no more texture maps that need to be redone every 2-4 years. And... AMD has done nothing? They control a CPU and GPU pipeline and they cannot out-do NVIDIA? Baffling.

    1. Re:Console Lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baffling? Why is that?

      NVidia, and Intel both have significantly higher revenue, R&D, market cap, etc than AMD does. Just because AMD does both pipelines, and have skilled people doesn't mean they can outcompete the money and headcount advantages of Nvidia and Intel.

  28. So Vulkan or what? by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So does Sony go with the flow and go full Vulkan this time? Or do they have their own idiotic plan.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:So Vulkan or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, its Sony. Of course its going to be massively stupid and proprietary. Whatever it happens to be, Microsoft and Nintendo will get cheap points for making fun of them for it like they are with the Fornite fiasco.

  29. oh em ge really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't have any good games on the ps4, so time to abandon it and start all over again? Another ps3? These days, I honestly see no reason to get an xbox one or ps4; same old same old. If I wanted militainment I'd join the military.

  30. Controller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would be happy if the PS5 came with controllers big enough to be used by an adult.

  31. Unbelievable: IMPERSONATING me again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Grow up! I'm still people (hard to find on BSD too but I did) test it & it's NOT yet released & won't be til I do the MacOS X one right after the TrueOS/BSD model's finalized & passes muster.

    * I know you're just JEALOUS "Jowie" but come on - grow up!

    APK

    P.S.=> I welcome YOU to do BETTER but that'd be MERE IMITATION & judging by your INFERIOR imitations of ME everyone knows isn't me? It'd be obviously inferior too, like you & you've long proven you can't do better + have folks like & use your work as they do mine so you are the "not-man" (lol) "ne'er-do-well" butthurt 'weezil' you prove yourself to be constantly either IMPERSONATING me or STALKING me by your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts (like some deranged obsessed LOON)... apk

    1. Re:Unbelievable: IMPERSONATING me again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK sucks at programming. So much so that it takes him weeks of effort to port a program that sorts a list strings, eliminates duplicates, and writes it out to a file. Work acceptable for week 2 of a CS 101 course is not to be held up as an example of one's programming prowess.

  32. MAssive fail by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Sony don't even come around here without 5K per eye VR rolling at 120 fps. If you don't have the technology for that, don't launch.

  33. Re:I bet the chip name has "AI" or "Blockchain" in by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    Or AMD and their PSP.

  34. It will have a camera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it will say "I see you!".

  35. Re:Trump will die in Federal Prison a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This person's probably not even American. Or he works for CNN...

  36. Navi GPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey!

    LISTEN!

    Watch out!

  37. Take a wild guess...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS. IS. SPARTA^WSONY!!!

  38. Re: I bet the chip name has "AI" or "Blockchain" i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Het you figured out what we were making fun of! Nice!

  39. What does this mean for the Atari VCS by randomErr · · Score: 2

    The Atari VCS (formally AtariBox) is scheduled to come out the general public (non-bakers) within 6-12 months of the PS5. Will the general public buy the VCS or wait for the PS5? I know that the VCS will use similar but much lower powered CPU and GPU's. So why pay $200-300 for a VCS when you can get a PS4 for the same price or a PS5 for little much more?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:What does this mean for the Atari VCS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can get the Atari walled garden market instead of the sony one of course!

    2. Re:What does this mean for the Atari VCS by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Consoles are defined by their games, not hardware. Whether the VCS crashes and burns or not depends on what Atari shows.

      So far, Atari has opened a crowdfunding campaign with nothing to show but a version of Tempest 4000, apparently being played on the VCS. Interestingly, the Tempest 4000 developers have stated that they have no knowledge if the VCS even has a dev kit at all.

      Frankly, as much as I loved my PS3, my PS4 has been collecting dust. I find it unlikely I'll buy either a PS5 or VCS.

  40. Registered /.ers disagree: U do better? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon February 11 2016

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    * See subject: YOU'VE DONE BETTER? Prove it! You can't & NEVER do!

    APK

    P.S.=> I always ask that of "your kind" & what do you DO? "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!", lol.. apk

    1. Re:Registered /.ers disagree: U do better? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you abilities didn't suck as much as they did you might actually be able to rebuke my statements but alas you are so fucking incompetent that you have to deflect and change the subject. We know it is because you don't have any arguments left to defend your self. This is why you lose every argument. Since you have been shown to be wrong so many times you should be considered a fraud at this point. Demanding other people prove something doesn't help your argument as it is really just one of the many ways you try to change the subject. Besides anyone who has taken a programming course and passed it has created something that can do what your silly little program does. It is just everyone else on the planet hasn't staked their reputation on it.

  41. I invite YOU to do better... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I could use the competition & I'd suggest @ least C++ for an app of the same type (however I've seen Pascal SMOKE IT a couple times, especially on MATH & STRINGS (which every program deals in & this one on the LATTER quite a lot)).

    * Good luck...

    (Would you like VERIFIABLE concrete undeniable evidence thereof on the latter portion of my statement? Ask & YE shall RECEIVE (that's WHAT I do, deliver reality, not "phantasy" (pats self on back, lol)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Length's BUILT-IN to Pascal strings not C (root of C++ null terminated BS that leads to buffer overflow exploits though) - word of warning is all... apk

    1. Re:I invite YOU to do better... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I said you can't rebuke criticisms of your work so you run like the little coward you are. Keep trying to change the subject like you always do when you have lost.

  42. AMD just didn't have enough to offer this year by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    AMD didn't launch a new GPU this year because they didn't have enough to offer to make it worth the effort. They could have done a 12nm die shrink of Vega, much as they did for Ryzen, but it wouldn't have gotten them to a fully competitive position against NVidia's current chips, let alone the GTX 1100 series when it appears. They have that machine learning Vega thing on 7nm, but the yield at their fab partner isn't yet high enough to go into mass production with that process. So it makes sense for AMD to wait until 2019, when both Navi and the 7nm process will be ready for prime time.

    Console partners like Sony and Microsoft are a significant part of AMD's plans, and it was console sales that kept the company afloat during the dark days between the failure of Bulldozer and the success of Ryzen. But AMD has given up on the computer market just yet, and Ryzen 2 and Navi could put them in a very good place in 2019. That year will be the first time in MANY years, if ever, that AMD will be competing with Intel without having to overcome a disadvantage in process technology, and they'll be on a level playing field with NVidia as it appears that both Navi and future NVidia GPUs will be on 7nm from TSMC.

  43. Registered /.ers speak for my work (not yours) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon February 11 2016

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    * See subject: Best part's the Linux 64-bit model's faster/more efficient (does 2x the work in 1/2 the time)

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject & WHERE's YOUR NON-EXISTENT VAPORWARE to compare vs. mine? Answer = it's NOT & never WILL be (you're not capable of excellence OR work @ all, lol)... apk