Slashdot Mirror


New 'Tent' Assembly Line Is 'Way Better' Than Conventional Factory, Says Tesla CEO (arstechnica.com)

A few days ago, Elon Musk announced a "new general assembly line" made with "minimal resources." As Ars Technica reports, this new tented facility "is seemingly the first phase of an entirely new building, dubbed 'Factory 2.0.'" From the report: The tent is easily visible from the nearby Warm Springs BART station platform. When Ars visited on Monday afternoon, there appeared to be cranes and forklifts moving around the site. We could not easily see inside the long white temporary structure, but there did not appear to be any newly completed vehicles rolling off the lines in the adjacent parking lot. Still, one automotive expert that Ars spoke with said that a new temporary manufacturing facility on the same site as conventional automotive factories was unprecedented in the industry. Dave Sullivan, an analyst with Auto Pacific, told Ars that he wondered what was wrong with Tesla's existing facilities, if Musk decided the company needed more capacity. "It's almost a sign of desperation," he said. "It's a sprint to be profitable in the third quarter." Ars notes that "each tent is 53-feet-high by 150-feet-long -- there seem to be several connected in a long line, mounted with aluminum framing." In a tweet, Musk said: "It's actually way better than the factory building. More comfortable & a great view of the mountains."

38 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. More room for manual assembly? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2

    Didn't they say they tried to automate too much? If so all this room is probably needed to allow more manpower to work in parallel.

    Whatever works.

    1. Re:More room for manual assembly? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Didn't they say they tried to automate too much?

      I think the real problem is they did it too quickly. Too much means that some things can never be automated. Too fast just means they have to take longer to get it right. Some lines that were made manual are now automated again, as they got the process working.

      The main point of manual labor is that you can speed up by hiring more people. With automation, you have to make the machine actually work before you can scale up by buying more machines.

    2. Re:More room for manual assembly? by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Musk said he automated too much. What does that mean? Who knows.

      Um, everyone who listens to the conference calls and the investor meeting knows? Just because you don't know something doesn't mean that nobody does :)

      You want an example? Flufferbot. There's a loose fluff used in the battery packs, and they made a robot to place it. Now, if you're trying to come up with something that would be difficult for computer vision systems to process, and for robotic arms to handle, you couldn't do much better than "fluff". The robot spent most of its time finding new and creative ways to fail to pick up the fluff, as well as to put it in inventive new locations. So you had these expensive robotics technicians both bailing it out of its mistakes and trying to adjust its programming to prevent them, on and on for months on end. When you could just have simply paid people to place the fluff.

      Flufferbot is gone, by the way ;)

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    3. Re:More room for manual assembly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You want an example? Flufferbot.

      That is not a job I would trust to robots just yet. At least not until the Westworld bugs get worked out.

    4. Re:More room for manual assembly? by Rei · · Score: 2

      The lion's share of Tesla's stock is owned by major institutional investors.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  2. Carnie's gonna bark by Scareduck · · Score: 2, Funny

    We already know who the clown is, now we've got tents for this circus. Very good, Elon.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  3. Humans take space by reanjr · · Score: 2

    Not surprising. Tesla has been shifting to humans over automation. They probably had some difficulty working around the existing layout and instead of reworking much of their factory floor I'm guessing they decided to move people outside. Heat from bodies may also make the factory uncomfortable if it wasn't designed for it.

  4. There's a lot to be said for agility by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Elon Musk and his company just built in 5 weeks, literally from the ground up, what GM might spend 10 years architecting and designing, getting the EIR, hiring the right unions and negotiating their contracts, contracting for an acquiring equipment, actually assembling it, staffing it, and starting it running.

    This race for profitability is actually viewed with contempt by a commentator of the conventional auto industry.

    There is a lot to be said for agility, as any manager or investor in a start-up will tell you. This is simply another difference between Silicon Valley business and the conventional auto business. The same sort of difference that allowed Tesla to make electric cars that could actually compete with gasoline cars on their own turf.

    I hear Ferrari is just starting to introduce one that might compete, after Tesla has had theirs on the market since 2007, with three new models since. But that's it so far. Ferrari is pretty agile as auto manufacturers go, but at the cost of low manufacturing volume. Ferrari won't be selling its cars at even 5000/month. Tesla is trying to get both the volume and the innovation.

    1. Re:There's a lot to be said for agility by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The German folks who disassembled a Tesla showed that the parts costs would allow Tesla to make a nice profit. I'm sure that when they're building an assembly line in 5 weeks they're not making money, but that assembly line is going to keep running, even if they eventually move it into a permanent building. Let' also remember that they are selling a whole lot of electricity storage, solar panels, cars don't even have to be their main income stream.

    2. Re:There's a lot to be said for agility by perpenso · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The German folks who disassembled a Tesla showed that the parts costs would allow Tesla to make a nice profit."

      On manufacturing costs, ignoring all development costs such as R&D.

      R&D, the cost of the land and building, etc are sunk costs. They are not considered in the decision to continue operations, they have no impact on the cost of operations. Now ongoing costs, taxes on the land and building, maintenance of the building, etc will be considered.

    3. Re:There's a lot to be said for agility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      you fail to mention they don't actually make that car yet so no it is not the quickest production car ever, that is what they intend to make by 2020 which by then I am sure the current top 10 will have also upped their game. current Tesla's do not do 250mph and are NOT in the top 10 fastest cars or anywhere near it. incidentally at 250mph even if they did make it today that would NOT make it the quickest production car ever, still well short of the top.

    4. Re: There's a lot to be said for agility by Rei · · Score: 2

      More to the point, if the "SpaceX options package" materializes, the thing should be capable of things like accelerating at high speeds straight sideways from a standing start. No other vehicle could even remotely hope to compete on maneuverability with a car that has an honest-to-god RCS on it. It's like stepping up to a fight, and on one side the person is armed with a knife, and on the other side it's an Abrams tank.

      Without that, though, the Roadster will indeed suffer from being heavier than its competitors (although will have the advantage over 2WD competitors by virtue of being AWD). Its trick will be speed and especially acceleration***. That said, it's important to point out that the Model 3 is not at all a heavy car relatively to its size and performance class. Which probably contributes to why its handling has been getting such rave reviews. Even the famously Tesla-hostile Randy Munroe said that its suspension designer could be a Formula 1 prince.

      *** Well.... it does have one other trick up its sleeve: torque vectoring. It has three motors; it can spin each of its rear wheels not just independently, but even in opposite directions. The car could even pirouette in place. That doesn't replace the impact of weight on maneuverability, but will offer a new set of maneuverability advantages at the same time. It'll be interesting to see which aspect wins out on a windy track.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    5. Re:There's a lot to be said for agility by Rei · · Score: 2

      Minor correction: This is a common myth; it's not battery overheating that prevents S and X from doing sustained track duty, but motor overheating - in particular, rotor overheating. Induction motors mean you have induction currents in the rotor, which means rotor heating. There are limits on how much you can cool a rotor; cooling the stator is much easier, as you can extend alumium or copper vanes from it in all directions and run coolant along them.

      Tesla's new primary motor is PM and thus has no rotor induction currents, and thus can do sustained track duty. Now, with Model 3 dual motor and performance configurations, the front motor is induction - but any time you're not running a 100% throttle, that's the motor it ramps down first, so in almost any realistic scenario, it won't get hot enough to overheat the rotor. The motor config on the Roadster is at this point unknown, apart from the fact that it will use at least some PM motors, and there will be two motors in the back (one for each wheel), one in front.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    6. Re: There's a lot to be said for agility by sexconker · · Score: 2

      keep in mind that the roadster's numbers are bottoms, not tops.

      So are Elon Musk's fans.

  5. I see by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who's the shift foreman, Sheriff Joe?

  6. Re:Makes sense by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Hey, it worked for circuses for years. Why not car production?

    And, if he gets a better tax offer from another state - easier to roll up, load onto a train, and move (again, like the circus).

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  7. Re:Better TODAY... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Union or no, you don't increase productivity by having people keel over from heat prostration!

  8. Re:Better TODAY... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3

    He knows that, he's just an asshole.

  9. Re:Check back after the first run by vtcodger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've never been in a modern auto factory, but I've spent a lot of time in places where complex weapons systems were assembled. Temperature and humidity control wasn't an issue. In California, there wasn't any of either although the sheer mass of the facility tended to moderate temperature swings. In colder areas elsewhere there was some heating.

    We're not talking a semiconductor fab facility here.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  10. Re:Better TODAY... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    I've been in lots of air-conditioned tents. However, any time it gets to 105 in Fremont, you can expect it to be front-page news.

  11. Re:Better TODAY... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone pretending to be you a few days ago for your lawsuit story.. Said they had a family computer and looked up porn on it.

    I saw that photo of eight blazing Core i9 CPUs, bathing in heat-sink grease and wet with cooling water, nestled in a motherboard carrying an entire 256 gigabytes of RAM. I'm still panting today!

  12. Re:Better TODAY... by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since the highest temperature ever recorded was in 1913, but the degree wasn't removed from the Kelvin standard until 1968, I think you are shaky ground here.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  13. Re:Looks good/makes sense except... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tent in tent, repeat as required. Been in several aerospace composites factories that are little more than tents-- a Butler Building really isn't all that different. Usually the floor slab does a lot to moderate temperatures, but you can easily set up a modular clean room inside if you need to.

  14. Tents by AlanObject · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you guys ever been in Denver International Airport main terminal? It's a tent. It gets as hot in Denver as it does in Fremont.

    Snark all you want but just because something is a quote TENT unquote doesn't mean it isn't a robust and practical structure.

    1. Re:Tents by samwichse · · Score: 2

      This is a Sprung Structure:

      http://www.sprung.com/structur...

      The people at Sprung call it a "building."

  15. You're all wrong by raymorris · · Score: 3, Informative

    Brookhaven National Laboratory is on Earth. They achieved at least 4 trillion degrees Celsius.

  16. Re: Looks good/makes sense except... by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The paint shop would most likely be in the existing structure, not the tents. But there's really no reason why you couldn't put it in a tent; all you need is a positive pressure system. Mobile chemical warfare decontamination units use tents; you just plug some air pumps with filters into them and make sure the pressure inside is higher than the pressure outside. Air will keep leaking out, but that stops any contamination from leaking in.

  17. Cars are OK in the open air ... by perpenso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its an assembly line for a product that will live in the open wind swept air, rain and mud, snow and salt, etc. Things that need to be sealed were likely sealed at the subassembly plant before delivery to Tesla. Plus they will still have a clean room for steps where there would be an issue, such as painting. For many stages, bolting in instrument panels, consoles and seats, bolting on doors, etc what is the issue? Is there an issue for welding frame components, given the material thrown into the air during welding I kind of doubt it?

    What are the open air and humidity problems that you are referring to?

  18. Europe's coming factory by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since most of the robotics come from Germany, I am guessing that the next factory will be in Europe, possibly Germany or France. It should be easy to set up a quick and inexpensive tent, followed by robotic lines.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Europe's coming factory by EnsilZah · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Elon recently tweeted this:
      'Germany is a leading choice for Europe. Perhaps on the German-French border makes sense, near the Benelux countries'

  19. Re: Good sign by shilly · · Score: 2

    Being unable to satisfy all of your demand is literally the opposite of being the end of a business. It's an existential requirement for a business. If you satisfy all the demand, and therefore have no demand left, you go out of business because you're not generating any more revenues.

    Apart from that, you were right on everything. Well done!

  20. Re:Thinking about cars by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    AC did you forget all the UK government holding company efforts of the 1970's? To try and save the UK car production lines?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  21. Re:Tents. by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Congratulations, you're the thousandth immature male to make that joke :P

    Concerning the article, some of this is head-smackingly stupid. E.g.:

    Dave Sullivan, an analyst with Auto Pacific, told Ars that he wondered what was wrong with Tesla's existing facilities

    *facepalm*

    There Is No More Space At Fremont. Something that has been discussed endlessly in the conference calls and at the investor meeting. Tesla applied for a permit long ago to build a new building, but it's still in progress, and meanwhile, they've been filling up Fremont at a rapid clip as they expand Model 3 production alongside the existing S and X lines. They could build a new line in a temporary building, get it up and debugged and running and turning out vehicles, or they could sit around waiting for months (or more) for a new building. Gee, I can't imagine what's the right choice here, hmm...

    The current building (still being improved, but with the line in place inside) is permitted for six months, but given that they've been liking it, it may become permanent.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  22. Re:Makes sense by Rei · · Score: 2

    Huh, that part never occurred to me. That's ingenious.

    Since these buildings are standardized and designed for assembly and disassembly, with stockpiled components for them, you don't even have to use the same building. Just wait until your new building is ready then disassemble the old one.

    Just have to make sure that the line is easy to take down and set back up. Wonder if the sizes of components on their next line will be based on what fits into a shipping container? ;)

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  23. Re:Explains the gaps by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This explains the strange gaps you experience in Teslas, trim not fiting right, strange squeeks and rattles, etc.

    Meanwhile, if you actually hung out on Tesla forums and watched people take delivery and write about their cars, you'd know that this is a myth. Yes, as with any brand, the occasional vehicle has problems, and needs to be corrected by a service centre. But it's not at all like the shorts portray, in their endless glee sharing every last case that they can get their hands on.

    Tesla has always had the highest consumer satisfaction rate in the auto industry. Back in the Roadster days when they were selling hundreds of vehicles, you all said, "Well, that's only because you have hardcore early adopters - once you get more mainstream, people will stop putting up with it and will hate Tesla!". Then Tesla started selling thousands of vehicles with the early Model Ss. And you all said the same thing. Then they were selling tens of thousands of vehicles. Then a hundred thousand per year. And are now moving into the hundreds of thousands per year. At what point is your "people are going to start hating Tesla" hypothesis going to come true? Did you ever stop and think that the reason people tend to rate them well is that they actually really like the cars after having owned them?

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  24. Re:Check back after the first run by whoda · · Score: 2

    Hundreds of casino's in the US use this same style tenting, none have rusting and ruined slot machines, nor do they have standing water by the craps table.

    People in the business of making money love the tents.

  25. Re:Didn't they read his letter from yesterday? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't stand it, I know you planned it
    I'mma set it straight, this Autogate
    I can't stand driving' when I'm in here
    'Cause your auto drive ain't so auto stear.

  26. Re:Check back after the first run by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

    Which makes sense because individual components may (or may not) need careful climate control for manufacture, but if the assembly of the whole vehicle is so fussy that cleanish non-wet conditions can be a problem, then those components probably have no business in a car that must survive weather.