Slashdot Mirror


Search is on For Cobalt-Free Batteries As Metal Gets Increasingly Rare and Expensive (technologyreview.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Conamix, a little-known startup based in Ithaca, New York, has raised several million dollars to accelerate its development of cobalt-free materials for lithium-ion batteries, the latest sign that companies are eager to find alternatives to the increasingly rare and expensive metal. The problem: The price of cobalt has more than doubled in recent months, as global demand skyrockets for the lithium-ion batteries that power electric vehicles and smartphones. It's also being driven up by the fact that the metal is mined primarily in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where labor and corruption issues are rife. Earlier this year, the nation decided to raise royalties on cobalt and other metals.

Given the ambitious expansion plans of lithium-ion producers, the world will face cobalt shortages by the early 2020s, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. This is keeping prices of lithium-ion batteries high and preventing major automakers from lining up long-term supply deals on favorable terms. The mounting threat to electric-vehicle growth has prompted a growing number of companies to explore other solutions.

153 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freedom Time! FUCK YEAH!
    Freedom Time! FUCK YEAH!

    Durka Durka

  3. Alt battery design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone ever hear anything more about that oddball lithium battery design John Goodenough was working on? The one that looked more like a capacitor, physically.

    He did a slashdot interview last year though I never saw any related stories after that.
    https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

    1. Re:Alt battery design by Rei · · Score: 1

      General consensus seems to be that that paper is bunk and shouldn't have been published.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    2. Re:Alt battery design by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      So it wasn't "'Goodenough"?

    3. Re: Alt battery design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      General consensus is dumb because it assumes that the symmetrical demonstration cell was supposed to be an actual battery. Which of course wouldn't work.
      But the point if the demo was only to demonstrate electrolyte function and lithium plating. This could then be incorporated in a cell with any choice of anode material.

    4. Re: Alt battery design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a fly on shit, you are, in any Tesla discussion. Do you know how badly you dilute your message?

    5. Re:Alt battery design by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "General consensus seems to be that that paper is bunk and shouldn't have been published."

      Those of us that actually tested it for shits and giggles (most jewelers that do metal work happen to have things for plating various materials) found it to be rather correct. Need to tweak plated layer thickness, otherwise you don't get shit for voltage, but it works.

      You can take your 'general consensus' and tell them to fuck off unless they've actually constructed their own in-house prototypes.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  4. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe it’s time to stop being racist and actually bring proper jobs housing food and sanitation to African countries if you want their raw materials.

  5. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about Tesla, they have no impact on the batteries market. They aren't even a big user.

  6. not enough resources on the planet to meet demand by lkcl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i've mentioned this before, on other articles that mention lithium batteries and electric vehicles. cobalt is not the only element involved that's in short supply: there isn't enough copper, there isn't enough neodymium, and lithium is a material that explodes when brought into contact with air and water. copper piping and wiring is already stolen from buildings and from church roofs.

    neodymium, i don't know if you've ever investigated how it's refined, but it's a radioactive-decay byproduct, meaning that it's only found in amongst *radioactive* deposits (where do you think those are dumped?) and the actual refining itself requires a THOUSAND LITRES of boiling sulphuric acid per 1kg of neodymium. the black market factory photos from remote places in china are shocking... chimney stacks just dumping sulphuric acid fumes directly into the air, and the waste dumped in the nearest river, poisoning the local environment for hundreds of miles downstream.

    and we have western governments, whose populations of course do not live anywhere near these mines and factories in Congo or China, banning diesel cars on the basis that they "create pollution", i mean.. .i'm really shocked by the total lack of understanding and appreciation of the true consequences of tthese "environmentally-friendly" decisions.

    i've been trying for many years now, but i honestly have absolutely no idea how to get this across to people that we need to trim down the *amount* of materials needed in vehicles. Category L7e "Heavy Quadricycles" such as Riversimple's design concept, the Renault Twizzy and so on, these are perfect: tuned up these small sub-350kg vehicles can go nearly110km/h (70mph), just like some quad-bikes, and that's with only 25HP!

    the concept is called "Mass Decompounding", you don't need power-assisted brakes, you don't need power-steering, you can use cross-radial hard silicon compound tires which will last 80,000 miles and have a rolling resistance coeffficient three times less than a standard tire... *all because of the dramatically-reduced weight*. and that reduced weight means a smaller engine, and if it's hybrid or electric it means a smaller battery.

  7. Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by superdave80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why I always wondered why electric car enthusiasts just automatically assumed that battery prices would just keep dropping and dropping. Sometimes as you use more and more of a material or resource, it may begin to become scarcer, thus actually RAISING the price.

    1. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because battery prices weren't close to their raw material costs. Even today they're well above their raw material costs.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    2. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      But it also drives research into alternatives. When doing something is rather inexpensive, there isn't a lot of incentive to invest money into exploring other ways of doing that thing. When it becomes increasingly expensive, suddenly the investment into new technology becomes much more reasonable. You wouldn't see nearly as much investment into electric vehicles if oil were still under $20 per barrel as it was in the late 90's and there wouldn't have been as much investment into fracking technologies and the exploration of U.S. oil reserves had the price not shot up over the subsequent years.

      As the cost of batteries increases, so too does the financial incentive to find a cheaper solution. There may be upward trends or sudden spikes over short periods, but the overall trend for just about any consumer good is downward.

    3. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      This is why I always wondered why electric car enthusiasts just automatically assumed that battery prices would just keep dropping and dropping.

      Because most major innovations recently have been in tech that have economies of scale, network effects, or negligible marginal costs. I mean, software and the various benefits of it scale really well, and that's what's been driving the economy forward for 30-odd years.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The thought is that as demand increases, production lines will be developed and drop the price.

      The upside is now that cobalt is becoming more expensive it is driving innovation to develop better batteries.

    5. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because battery prices weren't close to their raw material costs. Even today they're well above their raw material costs.

      Hey, come on now, stop that. We can't go having sane rational explanations littering up the place...

    6. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

      Raw materials for batteries are so cheap, that used batteries are not even worth recycling.

    7. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      While technology generally reduces costs, it's not as effective when the cost driver is the raw material itself. Jewelry is still very expensive, mainly due to the precious metals in it. Likewise, housing is growing ever more expensive, mainly due to limited quantities of land.

      Yes, you can build higher, but the cost of building skyscrapers hasn't improved at all. The Empire State Building, built in 1931, costs about $400 million in today's dollars. One World Trade Center costs $3.9 billion.

    8. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Because battery prices weren't close to their raw material costs. Even today they're well above their raw material costs.

      Let me re-read this: The end product's price is well above its raw material costs. No shit? Where else would it be, below?

    9. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      This is why I always wondered why electric car enthusiasts just automatically assumed that battery prices would just keep dropping and dropping.

      Because electric car producers understand the economics and actively work around them. Do you know *why* battery prices keep dropping? Mainly because of how each successive battery generation seems to have less cobalt than the last.

      Panasonic announced last month their aim to have cobalt free batteries very soon. As it is they have around 3% in their cathodes which is phenomenally low compared to the 20% in 2014.

    10. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 0

      > Jewelry is still very expensive, mainly due to the precious metals in it

      No, Jewelry is expensive because making it expensive is the only thing that makes it desirable. Typical jewelry has a retail mark-up of 1000%. Only fools buy jewelry.

    11. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Strange, why do we recycle them then?
      Wow: it is even cheaper to recycle one than to mine it, refine it, transport it and then use it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone that does no jewelry work. Well done!

      Some pieces can take literal DAYS to make as you have to cast each piece, carefully solder or fuse it together, make sure everything is polished and structurally-sound, then the stones need to be well-cut and also mounted.

      Faceting a single tiny stone to perfection can take hours.

      And those of us that do it all by HAND, not even using a rolling mill?

      You're only paying that insane markup at most chain jewelers because you aren't smart enough to notice the mass-produced molded shit is mass-produced molded shit, and that carbon crystals are actually way more fucking common than one thinks.

      You pay for the actual labor and skillset at a real bench jeweler, and only a minimal markup on the actual materials.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Not for long, evidently.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    14. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Jewelry is meaningless drivel"

      But it gets me laid far more than you.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re:Economies of scales does not ALWAYS work... by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 0

      Jerking off to PornHub in your Mother's basement isn't "Getting Laid" for your information.

  8. Re: not enough resources on the planet to meet dem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    not enormous resources on the internet to support all that self important drivel, hoss

  9. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if they got rid of their corrupt leaders the billions in aid may have had some effect other than lining the pockets of said leaders.

  10. Re:Tesla by mysidia · · Score: 1

    This is all due to the "shorts" though, not the Tesla management.

    Makes sense.... I remember reading a week ago or so about Elon alleging sabotage against the company and possible conspiracies being investigated.
    Who knew the shorts were willing to go to such extreme measures to try and recoup their bet.

  11. Re:So by torkus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeah, that worked wonderfully in the middle east two decades ago right? Oh, right...we've been 'fighting terror' in the area ever since.

    Now, if the USA turned imperialistic and claimed these places as territories maybe.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  12. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Operation Enduring Congo Freedom!

  13. Re:Tesla by torkus · · Score: 0

    Awe, is there some sand stuck up in your vag there cartman?

    You're skewed view and desperate need to bash tesla is adorable though. Maybe you've got a card or two in the short game as well?

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  14. Re:Tesla by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

    Tesla, or rather Panasonic, is leading the way in using low cobalt cathodes. I don't see this as a long term problem.

    --
    a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
  15. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colin Chapman says "Simplify, then add lightness" from 40 years ago.

  16. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freedom first. All the other stuff can wait. Look at how much we did for the average Iraqi

  17. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about we pay them what they ask for their raw materials, and leave managing their country up to them?

  18. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Takes a look at this "Twizzy" thing, immediately realizes that the OP is someone who can never be reasoned with as they just simply don't "get" what the common person wants.

  19. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They resisted our freedom. Hardly our fault.

  20. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 2

    Aluminum can be substituted for copper.

    Neodymium is used in NiMH batteries, which are on the way out. Lithium batteries don't use it.

    Lithium in lithium ion batteries doesn't explode. That's usually the electrolyte, although if you overcharge them you can get reactive lithium to plate out.

    --
    a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
  21. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest saboteur at Tesla - from ignorance, not malice - is Grimes's boyfriend himself.

  22. Re:Tesla by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just so people know:

    1) The "whistleblower" he refers to is the confessed sabateur.

    2) The 9% was a mix of middle management and the being-phased-out Solar City sales division (Tesla's solar division is switching to an exclusive focus on solar roofing products). Tesla has long been criticized for spending too much on SG&A. But of course, expect the shorts to make a fuss when they make SG&A cuts too.

    3) The "fire" was something suspicious smouldering in a vent. No impact to production. BTW, I love how you guys focus on every incident, no matter how minor, at Tesla, and completely ignore every issue at every other place, no matter how major. For example, at BMW's SC plant, a worker died from having his head crunched up by a lift. Did you even hear about it?

    4) The "tent" is a Sprung building. Cheap, fast, and can last for decades. They're popular for athletic buildings, warehouses, hangars, military applications, mining, etc. There was even one at "Ground Zero" in New York after the terrorist attacks. Reno Tahoe Airport used one for ticketing / checkin / baggage for years.

    Re, #2 and #4: please decide on whether you think Tesla is spending too much money or too little so that your arguments can be consistent. Thanks!

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  23. Re:Tesla by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indeed, their cathodes tested in at only 3% cobalt by weight, which is mind-bogglingly little. They've stated that they're quickly en route to using no or nearly-no cobalt. Based on the test results so far, I believe it.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  24. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or maybe it’s time to stop being racist and actually bring proper jobs housing food and sanitation to African countries if you want their raw materials.

    Or maybe that's their own fucking problem.

    It isn't like we went there and removed all those things. They are simply backwards, like they've always been.

    If there is one thing history can teach you, it is that you can't force someone in another country to adopt your values.

  25. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    In the 'Mass Decompounding' line but even better. The Ariel atom.

    You do want to cut weight, but you want to ADD power. Also sticky tires, not slippery ones.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  26. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    Permanent magnet motors - which Tesla and many others either use or are moving to - use gobs of neodymium and dysprosium. Typically 2-3 kg of neo magnets per motor.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  27. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've mentioned this before, on other articles that mention lithium batteries and electric vehicles

    WALL OF TEXT

    It's almost like we don't fucking care what you have to say, and saying it here doesn't affect anything in the real world anyway.

  28. Re:So by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    How's that working out for Puerto Rico lately?

  29. Re:So by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    You sound like you live in what they call 'the land of the free' and concern yourself with expanding that freedom to other nations. Touching.

  30. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    You break it, you bought it.

  31. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, the Japanese can make stuff. Too bad that Grimes's boyfriend's chocolate factory can only put a sticker on it, the wrong way.

  32. Re:So by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the short term, that's the way it is. But the DRC produces under 60% (still too much) of the world's supply, not 100%. Most other producers just make cobalt as a byproduct of copper and nickel.

    Cobalt has other uses, pigment, alloying steel, 'superalloys' and matrix for tungsten-carbide. https://www.statista.com/stati...

    8800 metric tons/year in the USA, 'Batteries' didn't even make the chart for end uses in 2015.

    I agree, the DRC haven't started any world wars. We should just continue watching the Europeans, closely.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  33. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tesla shills are out in full force. Grimes's boyfriend has been paying worthless trolls for so long, it is a small wonder he has no money for permanent buildings.

  34. Re:Tesla by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Tesla's batteries also use 1/3 the cobalt of the industry average. Other than Musk's Distortion Field, it seems to be their main advantage.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  35. You know what makes a pretty good battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gasoline. The dinosaurs got it right. Stick THAT in your Prius.

    1. Re: You know what makes a pretty good battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gasoline only works because photosynthesis has filled the atmosphere with oxygen. So you're running on solar power with a little help from dead... plankton and algae, mostly. Dinosaurs didn't make up a lot of the biomass.

  36. Re:Tesla by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    1) According to your "hero" Musk. Apparently the truth is this guy was whisteblowing about shady practices at Tesla. No surprise there! 2) OK thats nice. 9% of the staff was laid off then? 3) According to your hero Musk, it stopped the production line. And he tried to blame it on the "sabatuer" 4) I am with you on this one. It sure is cheap.

    They are spending too much money on the wrong things. It is a pyramid scheme.

  37. Re:Tesla by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading that Musk said we were all living inside a computer simulation. The guy is bonkers.

  38. Re:So by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    How about we pay them what they ask for their raw materials, and leave managing their country up to them?

    Certainly, that way we get to keep selling yachts and Manhattan condo penthouses to their elite kleptocrats.

  39. Re:So by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    So it's The King of Belgium's problem?

    I don't think the Congolese are going to be happy about that arrangement, but I'd buy the pay per view of the king arriving to take charge.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  40. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 0

    Sure, but if you claim batteries are the demand you look like you're ignorant. Also, if the neodymium gets too expensive you can always switch back to older technologies.

    --
    a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
  41. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Maybe just let the market decide this, apparently it's super good at things like that.

    Yeah, it tends to be.

  42. The price gouging via government surcharge there is to line the pockets of the kleptocrats, either via direct corruption or indirect (bribes) or most likely both. This is why dictatorships form.

    The free market, stuffed by this government-controlled monopoly, is looking for "substitutes" in the economic sense, which is why the price of commodities drops decade after decade sans "intervention", which screws this process up.

    This has a granularity of years though, to bring prices back down, if not a decade or more. But it is reliable as sin.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  43. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news...

    at least dysprosium is no longer in short supply.

  44. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helicopter gun ship style.

  45. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Permanent magnet motors - which Tesla and many others either use or are moving to - use gobs of neodymium and dysprosium. Typically 2-3 kg of neo magnets per motor.

    Add to that a big hunk of neodymium in every wind turbine.

  46. Vibranium ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard there's a small african country that has more of the stuff than it can use.

    And you can do almost anything with vibranium !

    1. Re:Vibranium ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, vibranium is a rare metal. But I prefer adamantium.

  47. Re:So by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or maybe it’s time to stop being racist and actually bring proper jobs housing food and sanitation to African countries if you want their raw materials.

    It's the corruption and dictatorship that keeps people poor. Japan has few resources but is economically free with rule of law to protect investments from robbers and corruption, so people can respond to needs.

    In places like this, you need kickback permission to do anything, and if you manage that, have to give a cut to the kleptocrats. Or it's a failed state and you just close up shop because of armed looting robbery. The kleptocrats may keep your competitors out of business, which is the opposite of a free market.

    It's difficult and dangerous and low reward to start an enterprise there.

    It has nothing to do with quality of government marshalling of a desirable resource. No resources needed to lift a society out of dirt-floor poverty.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  48. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That works so well in the country with the lowest average IQ in the world.

    I know it's not fashionable, but taking over that country and running it properly would help the unfortunates who have to live there.

    Sadly our idiot governments in the west seem intent on replacing us with them. In 30 years we'll be lucky if WE have plumbing and electricity.

  49. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abnormally low IQ is caused by childhood malnutrition. The generation growing up here will be fine.

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by rkordmaa · · Score: 2

    Raw materials are pretty marginal component of battery cost and there is material shortages only at current prices. Plenty more available at higher cost, which battery manufacturers can take without much impact to end price. Currently we are exploiting raw materials that are so cheap, that batteries are not even worth recycling. And bullocks on Neodynium, it's not rare at all, it's just that China has eaten everyone else out of market by using cheapest possible methods to mine it and saturating the market.

  52. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets make sure they compost too.. If they dont we can fine em!

  53. Tesla board is incompetent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the board of directors. They are all Musk cronies and a relative.

    None of them have ANY manufacturing knowledge or experience. Definitely nothing on autos. They are all web people and a VC that was part of the PayPal financing.

    Musk is incompetent. He is losing billions every year making mistakes that bring smiles to automakers.

    That SolarCity purchase that Musk made from his RELATIVES was unethical and questionable. Definitely some hanky-panky going on there.

    Musk's compensation package was just idiotic but the board, made up of his cronies, approved it.

    Tesla's capital structure is a house of cards. And if one day Musk can't convince stupid to keep dumping money into Tesla, it'll fall.

    But Evangelical Tesla fans and Musk True Believers just ignore the mess and delude themselves with cherry picked numbers - ALL of them are bad - and lies (Tesla isn't losing money! They're building up!) as if factories, wages, insurance, utilities are all given to Tesla from the Easter Bunny.

    Tesla fanboys are very stupid people. Oh! And the user Rei, I suspect is a publicist working for Musk.

    1. Re:Tesla board is incompetent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we suspect that you are a troll bought and paid for by Kock Bros.

  54. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

    Switching back? Ah, no, not really you can't. But if chinese neodymium gets expensive, then it again becomes profitable to mine it elsewhere in the world, so no problem really. Material costs are marginal for high tech products, the cost is in the making, not the material.

  55. Re:So by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Seems to be OK given they have the highest GDP per capita in the Caribbean. Of course, recovery from the hurricane has been slow and terrible, but just like in the US that is more a State/territory issue - the Federal Government is limited in what it can do, and even then it must happen only with the express request and permission of the Governors.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  56. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should definitely step in and interfere. It's always worked out well to show them the way.

  57. Re: Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, there is autodriving software to write and upload. Pushing metal out onto the pavement is the easy part. Can't we just get some machines to do that part so we can, again, just push code out to it?

  58. Re: Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Panasonic's batteries, no? Tesla puts a sticker on them.

  59. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by grahamsz · · Score: 0

    And every new natural gas or coal plant

  60. Re:Tesla by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    2) And even with the 9% layoff they still have increased their payroll since January 1st.

  61. Hey cobalt cant. But tin can by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    What does Uranium, Nickel, Cobalt, and Radon spell? UNiCoRn!

    What's the best formula for breakfast? Barium, Cobalt, and Nitrogen (BaCoN)

    1. Re:Hey cobalt cant. But tin can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radon? We have a shortage?

  62. Rare earths are mined and processed in California by grahamsz · · Score: 2

    Perhaps not as cheaply as the Chinese process, but my understanding of what MolyCorp are doing suggests that you can indeed refine Neodymium without dumping sulfuric acid into rivers.

    https://cen.acs.org/articles/9...

    This isn't so much an issue with Neodymium but with the fact that we tend to buy materials from wherever they are cheapest and without a second thought for the externalized costs that went into producing them.

    Radioactivity certainly is an issue if it winds up in wastewater, but if the radioactive elements can be isolated then I can't really see the issue with dumping them in the same environment. The processing is solvent based and it's not like we've "made more" radioactivity than was in the natural environment to start with..

  63. Re:So by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    You just described Wall Street.

    But here is another thought, US interests end at US boarders.

  64. Re:Tesla by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

    To correct the parent, Telsa claims at least part of the effort in Cobalt reduction is their own innovations as they have their own staff assigned to Battery technology working in Tandem with Panasonic. Musk has specifically claimed the next generation battery will be entirely cobalt free and the 3% figure comes from an independent teardown by Volkwagen's technologies group.

    This gives Tesla a MASSIVE advantage in battery production by eliminating one of the most expensive components (which is seeing huge price gains as well) in L-Ion batteries. Given this Cobalt free production they could undercut worldwide battery prices by 20% or more, which they haven't been doing as they are simply absorbing the extra profit..

  65. Re: Tesla by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a Tesla/Panasonic joint. Is the tech/IP/factory Panasonic's? Cause I thought that was their future business plan (supplying batteries to other EV companies) .

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  66. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

    Can't switch back to brush driven motors like have been used for hundreds of years and are still used in lots of places eh?

    The only reason they use Neodymium brushless motors is because the neodymium is so cheap, the second it gets expensive they'll be back to standard motors in no time at all. The rise of brushless motors was directly tied to Chinese subsidies in the rare earth production that cratered the price of rare earth material and made the neodymium so cheap they couldn't justify using brushes that need to be replaced every few years.

  67. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why do you fap so much over the thought of Tesla's downfall? There should be a lot for you to be happy about. You have a binary username. Tesla is taking the "computer nerd" approach to building cars. That should be interesting to you. They're electric! This company had a major hand in forcing other companies to rethink their stance on electric cars! Electric cars are cool! As a computer nerd, the thought of building your own car like you used to build your own PC is a really neat idea. Musk opened his patents for charging stations and many other things and gave them away. That's a very techy/computer nerd thing to do!

    Tesla is building those cars and manufacturing as many of those parts as possible in a country with safety and environmental regulations in place, and paying them a good wage. What is wrong with that? (See, I was generous enough to let you get one of your 50 anti-Trump/anti-republican rants in when you respond about how he's murdering the environment with a pointy stick and 'rabble rabble he gut the EPA').

    Tesla is a NEW car company that is NOT just a subsidiary of one of the major established ones. How many companies show up like that anymore? Very, very few. Even fewer are the ones who make it as far as Tesla has. Competition is GOOD. The ability for a small company to spring up and make a go of it in this industry is extremely good.

    So you don't agree with everything Tesla does. You will never agree with any company fully. You don't like Musk. Fine, most CEOs and people who obtain large wealth are insufferable people. That doesn't mean you can't admire the things the company does right, or at least appreciate how good it is that they can exist and compete in the first place.

    With your copious anti-Trump fapping and fawning over Democratic policy, I assume you are American. If so, why can you not at least be pleased that an American company is doing neat things, with American employees, on American soil, and American parts. Tesla has gained attention all over the globe. Some negative, but a lot positive. They have caused other companies to have to build a "Tesla killer". Tesla is something many people around the world look at and admire. Americans do not have much we can be proud of anymore. The rest of the world would rather see us fail, and enjoy being able to kick us when we're down. In this though, in Tesla (and SpaceX... another Musk company), we can be proud. Legitimately proud. We can talk about them without having an immediate rejection or response like "Murica. You're too stupid to realize _______ is better". You don't have to love them. You don't have to like them. Why can't you at least understand why others do? Why can't you at least acknowledge that they are a positive thing for the industry and the country? Everything you spew is negativity. It's bumming people out.

  68. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by schweini · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wikipedia doesn't seem to agree with you:
    "Although neodymium is classed as a rare earth, it is a fairly common element, no rarer than cobalt, nickel, or copper, and is widely distributed in the Earth's crust."
    There does seem to be illegal mining going on in China, but that's not a problem with the element, per se.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  69. research is cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA military is very expensive. It is cheaper to spend billions on battery r&d to develop a good enough battery. Heck, they are working on sodium ion battery, ie, won't need lithium either, for a good enough battery. Oil, on the other hand, has proven to resist decades of efforts to coming up with a cheap substitute.

  70. Re:Tesla by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Apparently the truth is

    Whose truth?

  71. Goodenough glass batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read here on slashdot a while ago that we are going away from Lithium Ion batteries because Braga and Goodenough's glass batteries are better.

  72. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame there's not one jot of scientific evidence to back this up - whereas there is masses of scientific evidence showing it's genetic

  73. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Sique · · Score: 2
    As far as I know, China refines the Neodymium with molten salt electrolysing similar to the Hall-Héroult-process used for aluminium.

    The other often used way is fractioned fluorid cristallization, which uses hydrofluoric acid, not sulphuric acid.

    And Neodymium like all Lanthanoids can be found in Rare Earth deposits, together with other Rare Earths like Praseodymium or Samarium. Maybe you are confusing Neodymium (atomic number 60) with Promethium (atomic number 61), which indeed was discovered as a fission product of Uranium?

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  74. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Also, if the neodymium gets too expensive you can always switch back to older technologies.

    http://business.financialpost....

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  75. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    "Rare earth elements" are not rare. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    And particularly Neodymium is extremely common.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  76. Re:Tesla by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    4) The "tent" is a Sprung building. Cheap, fast, and can last for decades. They're popular for athletic buildings, warehouses, hangars, military applications, mining, etc. There was even one at "Ground Zero" in New York after the terrorist attacks.

    Or, to put it in context, these "tents" are more substantial than the tents that the Trump administration has been using to house children in Texas, where the weather is much more extreme.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  77. Cobalt is a NONE ISSUE by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Right now, China is trying hard to control Cobalt by buying up mines all over (like they did with REMs) and spreading lots of lies.
    BUT, The Phillipines, along with Canada and Australia, all have plenty of Cobalt to last another decade for all batteries. IOW, if they took over 100% of all cobalt mining, they would still have an easy 10+ years. So, even with China trying to control this, they really can not. What is HAPPENING is that China is manipulating the stock prices and only idiots will buy into this garbage.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  78. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dickweed.
    Tripp had nothing on Tesla. Only idiots like you believe that. Yes, they have had a few fires. I suspect though that these are going to stop now that Tripp is gone. And as to building cars in tents, wow. You think that is bad for them to save money? Not in my book.

  79. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it is Grimes's boyfriend's factory that is busy figuring out how to drop the Cobalt and improve the battery, not Panasonic. Panasonic is just a manufacturing partner.

  80. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, spoken by the Kock bros troll.

  81. Re: Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.
    Who designs the iphone? Apple or FoxConn? Apple does. Same thing with Tesla Model 3 batteries.
    These batteries designed by a Tesla R&D lab that has hired some of the best people in the industry. They are simply manufactured by Panasonic.
    OTOH, the Model S/X batteries are Panasonic's.

  82. Re:So by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Racist?

    I'm struggling to understand your comment.

    Can you please explain how it is the job of western countries to bring such things to African countries, if they can just do it themselves? I'm sure you're also aware of the many efforts that are already doing this and have been doing so for decades.

    Or are you arguing that inhabitants of African countries lack the ability to do this themselves?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  83. Re:Tesla by Rei · · Score: 1

    I strongly recommend people go to Sprung's website and read about these things, they're really impressive. They can be heavily insulated; some are used in the high arctic. And one in Vanuatu survived a Cat 5 hurricane with only minor exterior damage.

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  84. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is, people keep claiming that the big auto companies will "kill Tesla" when they "finally wake up and get serious".

    The problem is that Tesla has a large advantage due to innovations on the battery level. Panasonic may be the only company with machines complex and precise enough to produce these, they can't easily sell it as the IP is entirely Tesla's, plus the machines are stationed in Tesla's own Gigafactory.

  85. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Most tend to be induction motors, because cooling is pretty easy when you're not space or weight constrained like in a car, and it can be cheaper and handle much higher temperatures (like you get with turbines).

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  86. I expect better from MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a beat-up!

    There is such an abundance of Cobalt that most of what is mined goes to waste because it's not economic enough to recover it. Cobalt commonly occurs with Nickel and Copper deposits, but the concentration:price ratio doesn't make it viable to add extraction processes at the mine mills for it.

    As soon as the price heads up and looks certain to stay elevated, the big boys like BHP will spend the money to add the extraction facilities to their mills.

  87. Re:Tesla by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Are you on the Model3OwnersClub forums?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  88. Re:Tesla by haruchai · · Score: 1

    "Musk has specifically claimed the next generation battery will be entirely cobalt free"

    Easy to promise; hard to achieve.
    It's always takes longer and cost more than Elon thinks as he's proven time & again

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  89. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Grimes's boyfriend's factory isn't busy figuring anything out, they just buy Panasonic batteries from Panasonic and cheap plastic cases from some ACME gongsi in Shenzhen and stick the batteries into the cases. And it's the "just a manufacturing partner" that figures out the hard job of making shit that works in volumes that ship.

  90. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, their policies to cut payroll costs are failing, too. Are you surprised?

  91. Re: Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the tech/IP/factory Panasonic's?

    Yes. The money to get it built is theirs, too. Musk just has his name written on the wall with big golden letters. Like a certain golden shower loving psycho you may have heard of.

  92. you are stupid windborn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you surprised China is investing for the future? Should they only be focused on next quarters numbers like a good little capitalist?

  93. Re:So by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Wow that idea of measuring against other nations in poverty, just so wildly corrupt. Yeah we know, as far as US corporation waiting to ruthlessly exploit Puerto Rico are concerned, why don't the Pureto Ricans just fuck off and die already so we can steal the land for cents on the dollar. Yeah they refused free money and assistance or are you seriously comparing that ludicrous loans with inflated interest rates as assistance.

    Rare earth mines are notoriously dirty and that is the reason for Africa not because there are not sources in the western world, Australia a good example but very expensive mines to run soundly and cleanly, can't compete with poisoning the general population in Africa with a cheap extremely dirty mine and processing facility.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  94. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or are you arguing that inhabitants of African countries lack the ability to do this themselves?

    Prove otherwise. The bell curve is not a theory.

  95. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or put it another way: if you seriously think that malnutrition causes a 25-30 point IQ difference averaged across the population, then you've got to provide some serious scientific evidence to back that up.

    Instead, you appear to have decided that experimenting on western civilisation is a good idea.

  96. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    due to innovations on the battery level.

    What are these?

  97. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Trump is president what you post just isn't true and it's all his fault.

    And if he did go above and beyond and fixed Puerto Rico then he'd be doing it because he wants to build a golf course for his Russian buddies and spread his Nazi agenda down there. He would also build a wall around Puerto Rico to keep Puerto Rican illegals from entering the US and taking US jobs.....

    I make a great progressive idiot don't I?

  98. Re:Tesla by Hodr · · Score: 2

    Little tubes that produce power through a chemical process. Usually used to power portable devices and machines.

  99. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Hodr · · Score: 1

    Posted in every thread about batteries ever. Thanks for the insight!

    Of course, the density of the material, location, and difficulty seperating it is where the cost comes in.

    Like gold, for instance. Les than 0.003 parts per million in the earth's crust. Enough in the earth's core to plate the planet with a 13 foot blanket. It's not "rare", it's just hard to find in easily accesible form.

  100. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Killing off the "Western civilization" is a good idea.

  101. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You retarded musk cocksuckers won't even learn to read...

  102. Re: Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same thing with Tesla Model 3 batteries.

    Except it's not.

    some of the best people in the industry

    Top. Men.

  103. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan is even worse than America in that whole 'print your way to prosperity'. Their debt levels are astronomical and they government buys stocks and bonds to keep everything afloat (temporarily). You can import a lot of prosperity if other places are willing to take your paper, once that stops though *shrugs shoulders*.

  104. Re:Tesla by Rei · · Score: 1

    Yep. :)

    --
    I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
  105. more crap from Windbourne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did China buy up all the REM mines?

  106. Re:Tesla by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, they'll put a Gigafactory in China soon. Then everyone can make them ;)

  107. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

    Although neodymium is classed as a rare earth, it is a fairly common element, no rarer than cobalt, nickel, or copper, and is widely distributed in the Earth's crust

  108. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Thanks - didn't know that.

    Still I don't think it's reasonable to say that the pollution caused in mongolia in refining neodymium is a function of "green energy". It's much more a function of the Chinese lacking sensible environmental regulations. If we wanted to start a useful trade war we could put tariffs on stuff that's made in ways that are needlessly damaging to the environment.

  109. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KarenRei?
    I thought you were a dude.

  110. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's start with you.

  111. Re:So by RevDisk · · Score: 1

    You do realize that Puerto Rico has done its own votes and so far has stayed a territory of the US, of its own accord? There is zero interest in keeping PR part of the US against their will. Mostly this is due to corruption and debt issues, and we really don't want to bail them out of repeated mistakes.

    There is only one major exploitation going on, which is that all ships must be US flagged (Merchant Marine Act of 1920). Trump waved this.

  112. Re:Tesla by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    KarenRei?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  113. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... your link compares Chile with Latin America & Caribbean. WTF?

  114. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Fully agree! Unfortunately, many assign "external" costs for bad power use in China and such against power generation industries and consumers here. Reliable power is one of the best ways to increase the standard of living of any country.

    And, unsurprisingly, when standards of living increase, people start to worry much more about their environment, their food, the work conditions of their friends and families, etc. I've spent about half of the last 20 years living in 2nd and 3rd world countries, working in factories, and I've seen the quality of conditions - environmental, social, and work - increase dramatically as incomes increase.

    I would argue the best thing we could do would be to push loads of reliable, clean power - nuclear - and watch what happens. There's a reason the environment in Shanghai is so much better than in Xi'an or Chengdu - much more nuclear power is available, much less coal is used. And unfortunately, that "reliable" thing really makes renewables (other than hydro) an iffy proposition. A few days of still air, or of low sunlight, and your reliability goes out the window. It's why countries that tend to have the highest share of renewables for electricity also tend to have the highest prices for electricity. You have to provide essentially 100% backup for when the renewables cannot provide what you need. So you "double pay" for generation sources. Go straight to nuclear and call it done, then spend the excess cash on cleaning up water, improved sanitation, etc.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  115. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

    A few days of still air over an area as large as China? Same with sunlight?
    I think they have bigger problems, maybe alien invaders put a dome over their whole country.

  116. Re:So by Agripa · · Score: 1

    Japan is even worse than America in that whole 'print your way to prosperity'. Their debt levels are astronomical and they government buys stocks and bonds to keep everything afloat (temporarily). You can import a lot of prosperity if other places are willing to take your paper, once that stops though *shrugs shoulders*.

    How does Japan's astronomically high savings rate figure into that?

  117. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by Agripa · · Score: 1

    Can't switch back to brush driven motors like have been used for hundreds of years and are still used in lots of places eh?

    There is no need for that. With electronic commutation being relatively cheap and already used for permanent magnet motors, brushless reluctance and induction motors are a better choice.

  118. Re:not enough resources on the planet to meet dema by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not uncommon to have clouds over a large (20%) chunk of the country. Or still air over just as much. I guess you can overbuild quite a bit everywhere, and upsize all the long-distance power lines... China is planning to double it's nuclear power capacity in the next 2 years. In 2017, China did about 246 TWh of nuclear power generation, more than solar and wind combined.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  119. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  120. This should be fun by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

    Let me introduce you to WindBourne. He thinks China is focusing on coal and you think it's nuclear.
    You can both argue with each other to see who is right.
    Everyone else can laugh at you both, safe in the knowledge China is actually building solar and wind.

    1. Re:This should be fun by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      They are actually focusing on both, putting large nuclear plants near big cities, and coal plants near up-and-coming smaller cities. Shanghai is essentially all nuclear powered, but go to Xi'an or even Shengzhou and it's mainly coal. China has a really poor power grid, and so distributing reliable power plants is common. China's building out the rest of it's new 23 GW of capacity planned to deploy in 2020, and will have another 30 GW in production at that point (probably completed by 2022 or so).

      Now, for solar, China has about 125 GW installed right now, but that's at a typical 17% capacity factor, so it's closer 21 GW if they're lucky. They are planning more nuclear than solar for a very simple reason - to keep their economy moving along, they MUST have reliable power. Nuclear does that - solar does not. And due to their poor grid, they cannot transmit power really long distances, meaning power plants must be located closer to the big cities in the East. A 1 GW solar plant needs about 4,000 acres of land; a 1 GW nuclear plant (like the 1.2 GW plant on Hainan Island) takes about 150 acres of land. Big difference, in a country where land near the big cities is at a premium...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:This should be fun by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      Must be a bit of a fluke that they have been doing this then.

    3. Re:This should be fun by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      They're trying to catch up. Consider that China is about the size of the US, geographically, with 4 times the population, and 1/3rd of that population living within a small, 100 mile wide strip of the East Coast. And power located all over. And you have a few dozen high voltage lines - and that includes the ones under construction.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  121. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a side effect. They know things are going to get worse so they don't spend now but save instead, knowing the crunch is coming. Which perversely means the crunch will come quicker and bigger when it inevitably does come.
    They are printing massive amounts of Yen just to tread water at the moment, Trump's trade shenanigans are just pushing up the Yen higher, making their problems worse. You may recall they had negative interest rates to try and force people to spend, and the Yen to fall. But it still wasn't enough. It won't end well for them.