Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Quietly Cuts Off Windows 7 Support For Older Intel Computers (computerworld.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: If your PC doesn't run Streaming Single Instructions Multiple Data (SIMD) Extensions 2, you apparently won't be getting any more Win7 patches. At least, that's what I infer from some clandestine Knowledge Base documentation changes made in the past few days. Even though Microsoft says it's supporting Win7 until January 14, 2020, if you have an older machine -- including any Pentium III -- you've been blocked, and there's nothing you can do about it.
Windows 7 is the Best Windows. , better than all versions which came before it and after it. The only thing it lacks is out of the box USB 3.0 support. The drivers not on the install disk but you ca add it.. That's all. It's everything you need.
Windows 8 was a stupid movie. "Let's change the UI, because, fuck it, let's change the UI." Nothing else.
And Windows 10 with its intrusive spying and adverts truly sucks ass. It didn't add anything of value either.
Microsoft is pushing out new versions because no one has gone for their subscriptions so new versions is how they make money. That is all.
> b0s0z0ku : Also, if you're not an idiot and don't go to random sites/click "run" on downloaded files, you're reasonably safe.
Wow. You really are an idiot. Precisely the sort of idiot who needs to be protected with security patches.
So, if a company just decides they don't want to honor the promises they made, they should be able to walk away whenever they want? That's incredibly moronic and you know it. Microsoft led customers to believe they would receive support through the EOL date. Prematurely ending support is going back on their word, and it shouldn't be legal for them to do this.
Doesn't change the fact that Windows 7 officially supports Pentium IIIs (32-bit x86 1GHz or higher) and has stated support to 2020. And that this inherently means if they're running in specific applications and are exploited because of malware because of a lack of updates, Microsoft can be sued through the ass not to mention be potentially brought up on fraud charges*. But, yea, let's try to spin this into being a minor issue and wholly the users fault.
PS - Even using your out of the ass numbers of 0.5% of computers (really using just Windows 7 sales (300 million), which is a smaller number), and you're talking 1.5 million computers. You don't think 1.5 million computers as part of a botnet would be a big thing? Or replacing 1.5 million computers early would be a big thing? Seriously, the sheer scale of expected support should have shut down Microsoft considering such changes.
Of course, the real lesson here is to cut Windows products out of your environment as much as possible. Any company that believes it can just mandate substantial changes to your business so you can keep accepting patches to fix ITS bugs is a trainwreck.
* Large corporations quite specifically are maximizing the life of bought hardware and scheduling software purchased based upon a support cycle. Anything that upsets that can be a massive loss.
I regularly use diagnostic x-ray machines that run Windows XP - these are considered "current" models by the manufacturer. I've also seen in regular use an OPG machine running Windows 98.
The key is that these machines are carefully isolated from the internet and are only able to communicate with their designated PACS and RIS servers. The XP based machines do have the ability to communicate with the manufacturer, but only if we take it out of use and place it into remote access mode, which requires the infrastructure team to enable a VPN on their end.
Most interaction between manufacturer and machine involves an engineer connecting a flash drive to it and downloading the logs to interrogate on a company laptop.