Slashdot Mirror


New Snapdragon Chips Bring Dual Cameras To More Mid-Tier Phones (engadget.com)

Qualcomm is launching three new chips for mid-tier smartphones -- the Snapdragon 632, 439, and 429 -- all of which promise to make dual cameras more commonplace. Engadget reports: The octa-core 632 is unsurprisingly the headliner, and can support two 13-megapixel rear cameras for those all-important portrait and telephoto shots. It's up to 40 percent faster in raw computational power than the Snapdragon 626, and that means enough power for 4K video capture and "FHD+" resolution displays. Its cellular modem can handle LTE Advanced, too. The Adreno 506 graphics are only about 10 percent faster, but you're still looking at a chip that can handle at least some modern 3D games without flinching.

The octa-core Snapdragon 439 and quad-core 429, meanwhile, are focused more on stepping up the baseline quality for lower-cost devices. They make do with support for dual 8-megapixel cameras and won't handle 4K, but they should deliver up to 25 percent more CPU performance over their forebears (the 430 and 425) on top of the AI-related functions. The best bang for the buck comes with the 429 -- while the Adreno 505 graphics in the 439 are a respectable 20 percent faster, the Adreno 504 inside the 429 is a whopping 50 percent faster.
The first phones using these chips will appear sometime in the second half of the year.

13 comments

  1. Less cameras please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and less children and minorities too

  2. What is "raw computational power?" by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    And what does it look like when it's cooked, ie how much faster will a useful algorithm be when implemented on it?

  3. Every Progressive Millennial Wants This: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A mid-tier phone to cradle against their shit-tier face

  4. camera for telephoto and for portrait on rear by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    i'd rather have 1 camera with zoom lens having ring or lever my finger could move

    1. Re:camera for telephoto and for portrait on rear by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      I use a real camera for important photos. A phone's tiny lens can't come close to the lenses I have.

      The phone camera is just for snapshots and convenience.

    2. Re:camera for telephoto and for portrait on rear by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      that's nice, I have some wonderful cameras too...but I don't normally carry them in my back pocket. neither do you.

      we have phones most the time and we want to take nice pictures with varying focal length.

      phone pictures can be very beautiful these days

  5. You progtards happy about harassing McConnell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This doesn't apply to anyone in the Trump administration who will soon be relinquishing all cell phones and such devices, for life in many cases.

    After a few more Supreme Court nominations? Who cares!

    Are you progtards happy now about harassing McConnell and his wife yesterday?

    Keep pushing that Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's working so well - for everyone but progtards.

    Oh, yeah - four of the top six biggest political donors in the US are public employee unions that give exclusively to Democrats.

    Not any more. BWAAA HAA AHAAAA!!!!

    Oh, that pesky First Amendment prohibiting compelled political speech. If you're upset about today's Supreme Court decision prohibiting compelled public employee union dues and membership, you're admitting you rely on dictatorial statutes to fund your policies. Who's the fucking Fascist?

    TOO MUCH WINNING FOR YOU!!!

    1. Re:You progtards happy about harassing McConnell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I thought that ruling made perfect sense, and I'm a Sanders voter. *(Bernie, the Senator, not the unfuckable ugly lying blob whose eyes don't face the same direction by the same name.)

      But it doesn't change the fact that Trump is probably going to prison, along with most of his family.

  6. Only two? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Why I wanna fuck around with two cameras, when I can have FIVE?

    https://www.engadget.com/2018/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Only two? by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      Why I wanna fuck around with two cameras, when I can have FIVE?

      For sure!

      Also, you get the very best shave from a razor with twelve blades, not just eleven like the competition!

    2. Re:Only two? by quenda · · Score: 1

      the very best shave from a razor with twelve blades

      Yes, we all got the reference before you explained it, thanks.

  7. Prison will give you time to read, Junior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allow me to give treasonous faggot Trumptards a heads up about the end portion of your lives and how that goes - https://www.cnn.com/2015/06/25/us/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-supermax-prison/index.html

    Hmm, nothing about dropping the soap. I'm sure Don Junior will find out either way.