Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Use Caffeine To Control Genes (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A team led by Martin Fussenegger of ETH Zurich in Basel has shown that caffeine can be used as a trigger for synthetic genetic circuitry, which can then in turn do useful things for us -- even correct or treat medical conditions. For a buzz-worthy proof of concept, the team engineered a system to treat type 2 diabetes in mice with sips of coffee, specifically Nespresso Volluto coffee. Essentially, when the animals drink the coffee (or any other caffeinated beverage), a synthetic genetic system in cells implanted in their abdomens switches on. This leads to the production of a hormone that increases insulin production and lowers blood sugar levels -- thus successfully treating their diabetes after a simple morning brew.

The system, published Tuesday in Nature Communications, is just the start, Fussenegger and his colleagues suggest enthusiastically. "We think caffeine is a promising candidate in the quest for the most suitable inducer of gene expression," they write. They note that synthetic biologists like themselves have long been in pursuit of such inducers that can jolt artificial genetics. But earlier options had problems. These included antibiotics that can spur drug-resistance in bacteria and food additives that can have side effects. Caffeine, on the other hand, is non-toxic, cheap to produce, and only present in specific beverages, such as coffee and tea, they write. It's also wildly popular, with more than two billion cups of coffee poured each day worldwide.

38 comments

  1. Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I’ve been doing that for years!

  2. Version 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Version 2.0 will use alcohol and be a much larger seller.

  3. Bad idea by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Does that mean you can only have one coffee per day?

    I don't think they've thought this idea all the way through.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Bad idea by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Does that mean you can only have one coffee per day?

      I don't think they've thought this idea all the way through.

      My thoughts exactly. Caffeine is in a lot of common products like chocolate, soda, tea, and coffee and people consume different amounts of these each day. Yes, it's relatively safe but if you are using it to regulate the release of insulin you need to strictly control the amount consumed so that you get the amount of insulin you want. This might work for lab animals but people aren't going to want to voluntarily go on a caffeine restricted/regulated diet. You need a safe substance that isn't regularly consumed in varying amounts.

    2. Re:Bad idea by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Obviously insulin was a proof of concept, not the real application.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they've thought this idea all the way through.

      So you really believe that these thoughts never occurred to them? Do you also think everyone around you is an idiot?

    4. Re:Bad idea by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Obviously insulin was a proof of concept, not the real application.

      I'm not sure that's the case but it doesn't matter if it's insulin or any other drug/medicine. A drug delivery system generally needs to delivery a very specific dose of the given medicine. I don't see how they can closely regulate the delivery of a drug using a chemical marker that is widely used in varying amounts.

    5. Re:Bad idea by SlashGodet · · Score: 1

      Chemotherapy: "YES but..."

      Diabetes / other chronic disease: "YES but... the penalty of overindulgence in coffee and chocolate is DEATH.

      Nooooo! When will reseachers investigate the healing properties of a hot bath and warm slippers?

    6. Re:Bad idea by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Well,
      obviously the proov of concept is about trigerring the expression of a gene via some thing you can acquire and consume easily, it is not about drug delievery per se.
      (facepalm)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Bad idea by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Does that mean you can only have one coffee per day?

      It depends on how sick you are. Caffeine Gene Control works according to the medicinal laws of Homeopathic Dilution . . . so the more the caffeine is diluted, the higher its Caffeine Gene Control potency.

      So, if you are normal and healthy, drink all the coffee you want . . . the high concentrations of caffeine means that it will not try to control your genes.

      If you are sick . . . just drink a thimbleful of coffee, and the high dilution, high potency caffeine will control your genes, and you will soon feel much, much better, and think that you'll go for a walk.

      For people who are very seriously ill . . . just sniffing a few whiffs of coffee will be enough to cure them.

      Probably.

      Wasn't there a 70's Electro Pop band called "Caffeine Gene" . . . ?

      I can't remember exactly . . . maybe I've had too much coffee . . . or too little of it . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    8. Re:Bad idea by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      How much is considered "overindulgence"? I'm just asking because of my 40+ year addiction to Mt. Dew. I could easily have been a lab rat for their product testing. I've made it to nearly 60 w/o anything more than a couple nasty headaches when I went off cold turkey.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    9. Re:Bad idea by SlashGodet · · Score: 1

      As it stands today, there is [nearly] no known limit to caffeine intake. (Investigated this question a few years ago when the newspapers claimed a teenager killed herself with too much caffeine.) However, this THERAPEUTIC METHOD being developed uses caffeine as a SWITCH to turn on the production of insulin...

      ...and other therapies may use the same switch. That makes it necessary for the patient to strictly limit caffeine, because it will now result in the delivery of a drug therapy.

      3

  4. The trial had one odd side effect by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    the team engineered a system to treat type 2 diabetes in mice with sips of coffee, specifically Nespresso Volluto coffee

    Without even being asked to, the mice coded a small but functional operating system for Raspberry Pi. Though it was quickly infested with catware, it did basically run.

    1. Re:The trial had one odd side effect by SlashGodet · · Score: 0

      Type 2 Diabetics ipso facto have trouble with food control. Asking them to control caffeine intake to cure their disease is... [waves hands] ... ignoring the obvious.

      Sarah Hallberg | Reversing Type 2 Diabetes. {TED TALK} https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      If they could control what goes down the alimentary canal, they would not have Type 2 Diabetes.

    2. Re:The trial had one odd side effect by SlashGodet · · Score: 1

      Troll moderation? My comment above was not intended to cause offence. I believe it is well known that over-consuming sugar, which is everywhere in our modern diet, causes surges in insulin. The over-stressed insulin receptors lose sensitivity to insulin, gradually leading to "Type 2" or Adult Onset Diabetes. The video linked above is a Doctor who runs a Diabetes Clinic discussing the role of a low-carb diet in reversing Type 2 Diabetes. Here is that link again, misguided moderator who tagged my post as trolling: --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    3. Re:The trial had one odd side effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No everyone has type 2 diabetes for the same reason. My wife has it because she has a weak heart. So, yes, troll.

  5. Coffee by Dirk+Becher · · Score: 1

    Is there anything it can't do`?

  6. Re:Can't Control Fake News by reboot246 · · Score: 2

    No, no, no! We need more journalists. There are only a handful of real journalists left. The ones you're complaining about are really advocates for one side or the other pretending to be journalists.

    I think most readers are smart enough to recognize the difference between journalism and advocacy. My main complaint is that very few of them (the pretenders) seem to educated. It's nearly impossible to read an article by one of our local writers without finding multiple misspelled words and a few grammatical errors. Words are their tools and you'd think a "professional" writer would know how to use those tools.

  7. Can they do anything with a cannabinoid receptor?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One j a day to keep the doctor away?

  8. Stop the Evil Drug Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they cure diabetes with this research, they will want to charge us a bunch of money. We need to shut these evil pharmaceutical companies down now! (unless they first promise to give away this new treatment for free)

  9. Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a synthetic genetic system in cells implanted in their abdomens switches on

    Is the component doing the actual work. The mechanical light switch isn't the headline behind turning a light on.

  10. diabetes was a poor choice by swell · · Score: 0

    Diabetes was a poor choice for this experiment. Most diabetics ( the common type 2 ) already produce massive quantities of insulin after eating carbohydrates. The insulin floods their body, but because of the frequency of these events, the receptors that use the insulin are exhausted and unable to manage the glucose. This insulin excess combined with the untreated glucose is stressful to the body and the brain, which is why diabetics are often sleepy after a poorly chosen meal, and prone to dementia.

    There is no benefit to stimulating more insulin production for most diabetics.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  11. How about CURING instead of leeching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diabetes is not that hard to cure.
    It is just that psychopaths have actually made us believe that for-profit ventures are totally not crimes and totally not the same thing as fraud/theft/robbery.
    Which goes so far that they even allowed "for-profit health care" which is more of an oxymoron than anything George Orwell could have come up with.

    I cured my type 2 diabetes. And m brother cured his type 1 diabetes (which is an auto-immune diease, similar to allergies, and hence cured the same generic way.)

    1. Re: How about CURING instead of leeching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No cure for stupid.

  12. Caffeine != Coffee by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of bio-active chemicals in coffee, caffeine being the most obvious. Interchangeably using the words coffee and caffeine to report the results of an experiment is sloppy and misleading.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Caffeine != Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the most lay man agrees.

    2. Re:Caffeine != Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the experiment used coffee as a caffeine delivery vehicle (who doesn't), so while the receptors were regulated with caffeine, the experimenters regulated coffee intake.

      The aren't the same thing, but in this case they were proportional.

  13. Where does the insulin go then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And do you mean type 1 or type 2?

  14. Missed Headline Opportunity by mentil · · Score: 1

    Geneticists Learn to Code in Java

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Missed Headline Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was awesome. I laughed out loud. You have won the Internet.

  15. For those who can't take caffeine? by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

    Some people have caffeine cause multiple health problems and can't use it. Like myself for example. Guess we get cut out of the medical future.

    1. Re:For those who can't take caffeine? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      And others, like myself, have no trouble drinking 6-10 Mt. Dews a day for 40+ years w/o any sideEFfecTs.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:For those who can't take caffeine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, this is the end of this type of research so you are fucked.

      Of course, you seem quite dumb so perhaps Darwin needs to step in here.

      numbnuts

  16. That's funny by gijoel · · Score: 1

    I use caffeine to control scientists.

  17. Really? Not so great. by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    How many cups of coffee did you have today? I had about 5 strong cups yesterday. I foresee people ending up in the hospital with low blood sugar on a regular basis. And it is NOT " ...only present in specific beverages, such as coffee and tea..". This is just being deliberately stupid to support a thing you want to do.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  18. Scientists use caffeine to control Gases?!!! by vaibhav.dlv · · Score: 1

    Read it as "Scientists use caffeine to control Gases" and was dumbfounded for a minute!

  19. In 99.9% of the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The beetus is easy to avoid: Don't become a fat ass and eat decently.

    smh

    numbnuts