Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Will Show Who Pays For Ads and How Much They Spend (bloomberg.com)

Twitter will show detailed information about advertisers in an attempt to combat meddling in future elections. You will now be able to search for a Twitter account and see all the ads it has run in the past seven days. "For U.S. political advertisers, users will be able to see billing information, ad spending, demographic targeting data and the number of times tweets have been viewed," reports Bloomberg. From the report: The changes are part of Twitter's broader efforts to clean up its service after lawmakers berated the company for failing to discover Russian influence peddling through fake accounts and divisive ads during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Earlier this week, the company began requiring more authentication from users. In May, it rolled out stricter rules that require advertisers running political campaign ads for federal elections to identify themselves and certify they are located in the U.S. The company has also banned ads from accounts owned by Russia Today and Sputnik.

31 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. Thanks Trump by Kunedog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just another in a long line of longstanding issues that got zero coverage before the media started pretending that "Trump did it" or that it happened because of Trump.

    1. Re:Thanks Trump by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It got attention because of Russia meddling in US politics. Don't be obtuse.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:Thanks Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one would have cared that Russia meddled if the "right person" had gotten elected. To date, no one STILL cares about the meddling that Clinton did

    3. Re:Thanks Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Had she won there would have been no fuss about any Russian interference. Obama had actionable intelligence 8 months before the election and did not say or do anything. His stated reason for taking no action on the intelligence was he did not want to disrupt the on-going campaigns. Of course he and all the political experts fully expected Clinton to win the election. If she won there would be no need to bring up any Russian interference. All the social media companies would have never changed any of their operations or summoned to Congress for a hearing. Just like there would have been no efforts to eliminate the "un-fair" electoral college. And if Clinton had won the government would have pretty much stayed the same. Trump is an idiot but he has said a lot of things other Presidents only wish they could have said.

      Everyone complaining about Trump's actions act like the world was a perfect place before he came along and crashed the party. The old "stay the course" diplomacy and governmental operations caused most of the problems we face today.

      Trump decided to take some different approaches to the intractable and long lasting problems in the world. He openly castigated NATO members for not honoring their monetary and resource obligations to NATO.

      He exited the Iranian nuclear agreement because the US was the only signatory that got nothing. The EU was after billion of dollars in Iranian trade. Russia got to look like a model global citizen just doing good things for good people as well as expanding economic possibilities. The Iranians received the ability to enter the world trade and currency markets. They received all the assets the US froze since 1979. All Iran had to do was turn off a couple of centrifuges. The Iranians used their windfall to put into it's ballistic missile programs. And the Iranian nuclear research library stolen by the Israelis painted an entirely different spin on Iran's nuclear weapon capabilities. The only thing the US got out of the agreement was a pinky promise to not build nuclear weapons.

      He recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Actually he just enacted an existing US Congressional law to do so. People argued this would cause more violence in a region. Exactly when is the last time violence was taking place in the ME? In terms of body count the embassy move was about as peaceful as it gets.

      He has also went about securing Arab buy in to the Palestinian peace plan the US government is pushing. Most of the Arab countries in the area are placing economic concerns above supporting the Palestinians. It seems the Arab's are finally getting over the embarrassment caused by getting their assess kicked by the Israelis every time they attempted a military solution to run the Jews into the sea.

      The tariff backlash is caused because no body wants the status quo challenge. And the status quo seems to require the US to shut up and accept all the shitty trade agreements in the name of global happiness. And lets see how far Europe is prepared to go when they lose their US military protections they have taken for granted over the past 60 years. And Canada already levies heavy tariffs on US imports. They are not complaining because they think the existing trade agreements are fair for all parties and should not be meddled with they are complaining about Trump having the nerve to binging the subject up in public.

      He exited the Paris Climate Change agreement because there was not a single benefit for the US. The reduction of green house gases and other pollutants related to fossil fuel use is already occurring. Alternative energy sources are growing every year. Exactly what does a piece of paper created by lofty academics and professional environmental activists actually accomplish?

      The real problem is Trump actually using the power the US wields when US interests are challenged.

    4. Re:Thanks Trump by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The Russian interference amounted to about $1.25 million per month, compared to the $1.2 billion spent by Hillary, or $617 the million spent by Trump.

      That's a cute way of comparing totals to monthly amount to disguise the total amount. But your numbers suggest (once per month is totaled) that ~2% of Trump's spending by Russia.

      Also, while money is money, the ability to spend money in certain areas is limited by US entities. That's not even counting that people saluting a flag are often underpaid.

      All that said, Hillary deserves some blame too. It's not all one or all the other.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Thanks Trump by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to polarize the debate and take a calm, rational look at it. There is hard evidence of Russian interference in US democracy. There is also a solid argument to be made that Clinton was not a good candidate. Both those things can be true and have a significant impact.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Thanks Trump by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to polarize the debate and take a calm, rational look at it. There is hard evidence of Russian interference in US democracy. There is also a solid argument to be made that Clinton was not a good candidate. Both those things can be true and have a significant impact.

      But life is so much easier if you can just say Trump=Good, Clinton=Bad. (Or vice versa).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Thanks Trump by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      The correct solution is to reduce the power of government, and, by doing so, reducing its control as a prize.

      Increasing power, including censorship of the printing press to mass produce and distribute speech, is rocketting in the wrong direction.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:Thanks Trump by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Can someone please tell me what form that "Russian meddling" took? All I've seen is that they've advertised. Which is what the candidates and various pressure groups and special interest groups also did.

      Is advertising magical? Does advertising somehow exert mind-control on voters? When done by Russians, I mean.

      Not when done by agribusinesses or political parties or the AFL-CIO or the U.S. Army or any of the many siblings of the Military-Industrial Complex. That advertising is completely non-magical.

      But that Russian advertising appeals to the prejudices and uses the voters' unacknowledged assumptions to hoodwink, bamboozle and just outright fool voters.

      Because -- except when being advertised at by Rooooskis -- American voters can't be fooled into voting badly. But when advertised at by foreign Roooskie B.S. artists -- rather than domestic B.S. artists -- they get fooled every time.

      At least that seems to be the argument.

      Which of course makes no sense.

      Did I miss something?

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    9. Re:Thanks Trump by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Is advertising magical? Does advertising somehow exert mind-control on voters?

      Facebook said the same thing at first, then they looked at how it changed how people posted. Psychological profiles were built on people and then applied the correct pressure.

      American voters can't be fooled into voting badly.

      They absolutely can and are regularly. The entire republican platform is built on that concept.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    10. Re:Thanks Trump by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      They absolutely can and are regularly. The entire republican platform is built on that concept.

      Advertising works, well enough. Well enough to pay for it, at least sometimes, for some advertisers. Is anyone surprised?

      As for political parties fooling people, it's not like the Republicans (FTFY) have a lock on it. Have you heard of the Democrats?

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    11. Re:Thanks Trump by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      your either ignorant of the type of "advertising" they were doing or you are being disingenuous about it. either way, stfu and fuck off. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    12. Re:Thanks Trump by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      your either ignorant of the type of "advertising" they were doing or you are being disingenuous about it. either way, stfu and fuck off. ;)

      Thank you for the advice, but no thanks. (Also, brief pretend paranoiac interlude: George Soros didn't get his money's worth from you today. Or were the spelling and punctuation errors deliberate, as part of your on-line persona?)

      The kind of weird-ass stuff TDS suffers would post for free? Yeah. I'm aware. (The TDS-R strain of Trump Derangement Syndrome.) At least, I think it was sincere. I meet equally deranged people IRL, so it's certainly possible.

      So, what's your point?

      I don't expect beer or pickup truck or shampoo commercials to give a thoughtful fact-based analysis of why someone should choose their product rather than another one. And I don't expect if of political commercials.

      Does anyone?

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  2. *Paid by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Cool. Now show who has already PAID for ads.

    1. Re:*Paid by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Cool. Now show who has already PAID for ads.

      It would not do you much good. Up until now even foreigners could buy campaign ads in the US with impunity. People who have tried to trace money flowing into PACs have basically hit a wall of shell companies and obscure financial service companies with unclear ownership. Now Google, Facebook, Twitter et-al are checking only that ads are paid for by a US entity. I'm willing to bet that all that will change is that from now on the last entity the money is routed through before it ends up in Google, Facebook and Twitter's coffers will be a US based shell company in order to pass Google, Facebook and Twitter's pathetic attempts at vetting. The situation in Europe is even worse. The Russians are actually openly financing Fascist parties like FN for example, neither the FN nor the Russians are even bothering to hide it.

    2. Re:*Paid by snapsnap · · Score: 1

      They don't have that information from before so they can't release it.

    3. Re:*Paid by johnsie · · Score: 1

      I'd mod this up if I had points. That's exactly what they were doing anyway. Paying people in the US to pay for ads using made up group or company names.

  3. Re:Let the corruption begin by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 2

    No more than before, why would a bad actor ever use anything that can be traced back to themselves? Twitter has always had this info and with a court order be made to provide it. This is just a publicity stunt.

  4. Thanks Trump by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It got attention because of Russia meddling in US politics. Don't be obtuse.

    It got attention because Hillary lost, and there had to be *some* reason for it that didn't put the blame on Hillary or the Democrats.

    Along with sexism, misogyny, Bernie Sanders, Wikileaks, low information voters, women under pressure from men, and James Comey.

    Hillary's comment is informative:

    "I never imagined that [Putin] would have the audacity to launch a massive covert attack against our own democracy, right under our noses - and that he'd get away with it."

    The Russian interference amounted to about $1.25 million per month, compared to the $1.2 billion spent by Hillary, or $617 the million spent by Trump.

    But it's probably good to be able to tell who's purchasing ads in future elections.

  5. Memes next? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    When to meme is too politically funny will the artist have to ID themselves and prove they are located in the U.S?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  6. Information like this by Kohath · · Score: 2

    Something called "the Committee for Government Healthiness" spent money. Thanks Twitter. We still don't know anything about this group or whether they go by 100 other names.

  7. Re:Seven DAYS? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    That's way too much work. Just nuke the ads from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  8. Re:Excuses for a traitor by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you voted for Hillary, she committed the greatest of all crimes during an election, rigging one. The whole thing, from Email servers, to DNC hacked Emails, to tarmac meetings, to Deep State spying was all exposing her for the crimes she and others on her direct behalf were committing (and some are continuing to this day).

    The ONLY thing so far to come out of the Trump/Russia Collusion story is ... Hillary paid for FSB sponsored dirt on Trump, the Deep State used that to spy on his campaign, and have lied and obfuscated to cover it all up (to no avail). And you're convinced Trump is the bad guy.

    I didn't vote for the guy for a variety of reasons, but seeing the twisting liberals and democrat hacks are going through backfiring left and right only makes me giggle in delight.

    Hillary is a lifelong political criminal. I'm glad she lost. Maybe you can nominate her again ... I hear 3rd time is a charm.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  9. Re:But.. how does this help ad viewers? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The politically smart will just hire artists to make memes and create accounts in the USA to show them for free.
    A good meme will not got blocked as it is part of the site and user content.
    The SJW idea of censoring political ads is not going to work.
    The content will become political.
    Will the SJW then expect a site to politically approve artistic content for its powers of US political persuasion?

    Any meme with too much amphibian related political messages can be reported to SJW?
    No political donkey cartoons? No coughing fit animated loops?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. If that headline is entirely correct by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Then I'd be sorely tempted to short $TWTR. Advertisers do not like customers knowing their being advertised to, at all.

    That's not how advertising (generally) works.

  11. Re:Excuses for a traitor by ranton · · Score: 2

    Actually I didn't lose. Trump is going to prison for the rest of his life and Republican faggot cowards like yourself will have to just deal with it ongoing forever, bitch. Don't cry snowflake, Donald doesn't care if you live or die lol. Moron.

    Ha, even if you are right about Trump going to prison you still lose. They aren't going to remove his Supreme Court nominations, which is arguably the most important thing a president does (arguably by a very large margin). A Republican will still be in office even if Trump is sent to prison. A Republican will still be in office even if Pence is impeached along with Trump.

    A significant amount of the damage cannot be undone. The effects of the 2016 election will be felt in the most impactful legal decisions in this country for at least 20 years, if not 30.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  12. One disposable account per ad by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Create a bunch of fake accounts. Each one is a shell for one and only one ad.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    1. Re:One disposable account per ad by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Create a bunch of fake accounts. Each one is a shell for one and only one ad.

      Well, some of those names Twitter has provided from the Yoyodyne Corporation look strangely familiar:

      Vlad Barnett
      Vlad Bigboote
      Vlad Camp
      Vlad Careful Walker
      Vlad Chief Crier
      Vlad Cooper
      Vlad Coyote
      Vlad Edwards
      Vlad Fat Eating
      Vlad Fish
      Vlad Fledgling
      Vlad Gomez
      Vlad Grim
      Vlad Guardian
      Vlad Icicle Boy
      Vlad Jones
      Vlad Joseph
      Vlad Kim Chi
      Vlad Lee
      Vlad LittleVlad
      Vlad Many Jars
      Vlad Milton
      Vlad Mud Head
      Vlad Nephew
      Vlad Nolan
      Vlad O'Connor
      Vlad Omar
      Vlad Parrot
      Vlad Rajeesh
      Vlad Ready to Fly
      Vlad Repeat Dance
      Vlad Roberts
      Vlad Scott
      Vlad Shaw
      Vlad Smallberries
      Vlad Starbird
      Vlad Take Cover
      Vlad Thorny Stick
      Vlad Turk
      Vlad Two Horns
      Vlad Web
      Vlad Whorfin
      Vlad Wood
      Vlad Wright
      Vlad Ya Ya

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  13. Re:Excuses for a traitor by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    If you're not paranoid, you're not paying attention.

    Just because one is paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get us.

    And yet, the Political Left is based on the greatest boogie men conspiracies, and yet nobody calls it that "Because it is real" (Racism, Sexism, Homophobia etc etc etc). FYI, I don't deny these things exist, I deny their power at the Federal, State, and the "System" levels.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  14. Re:Lawyer Proxy by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    (Clicks little ? on ad) "This ad paid for by Americans for Free Elections America Great Comrades, Tampa, FL"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  15. Re:ON thE bAd CENsorSHIP lolliPOP by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    The ruddy-blooming ruskies gots a right to peddle putin will up on your americanski's arses just as much as republicans have da right to keep your pending baby. Let thar be lite! For those about to rock! Fire! We salute jou!

    - Zoya the Destroya, GLOW

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.