Slashdot Mirror


South Korea Cuts Its Work Limit From 68 Hours a Week To 52 (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: South Korea has lowered its maximum working hours from 68 hours a week to 52 hours. The legislation, which went into effect Sunday, received overwhelming support in the National Assembly in an effort to limit the time employees spend on the job. South Korea has the third highest number of hours worked of 37 countries tracked by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, with the average person in South Korea working about 2,024 hours in 2017, or approximately 38.9 hours a week.

5 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. Great idea by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now let's do that here in the US. No exceptions. If the job requires more than 50 hours to accomplish then you need more people doing it. If you can't afford to have more people doing the job then you shouldn't be in business.

    --
    THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    1. Re:Great idea by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wouldn't work in software since there's such a lack of programmers compared to demand and programming has such a huge communication overhead that it's more efficient to work more hours than add more people.

      Actually, all the research I've seen in this area says the opposite — that you can work maybe one 60-hour week before you start to lose productivity, and over the long term, you're no better off working 60 hours than 30 hours. Your productivity actually goes negative at around 45 hours, IIRC, and diminishing returns begin at 25 or 30 hours. I forget the exact numbers, but that's in the right ballpark. So you're almost always better off adding more people than working more hours, unless the need is very short-term.

      The only companies that do well by forcing people to work crazy hours are game developers, and that's because they know they can burn out one group of devs and move on to the next set of suckers. For everybody else, it is generally self-defeating.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  2. Re:38.9 hours a week. ? Thats weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I show up for 40 hours a week. They get about 5 hours of work out of me, if they're lucky.

  3. Re:Only 52 by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Informative

    A few factors to consider, depend on the exact methodology used.:

    1. People not in the workforce, such as children and retirees.
    2. Part timers.
    3. Vacation time.

    Just two weeks vacation turns a 40 hour week into a 38.5 workweek.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  4. Re:38.9 hours a week. ? Thats weak by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    yeah. I've seen plenty of companies that expect (i.e. dont even ask) you to work an extra 15 hours/week UNPAID just because they are missing a deadline which they promise is an exceptional situation but is clearly planned in and happens every other week .I mean we hired you because you're a team player right? Also factor in that many US companies start employees on 10 days/year paid leave and then have the balls to even take 2 or 3 of those back for non-voluntary shutdown over Christmas, and I would argue the US has some of the most oppressed salaried employees in the world.