Uganda Rolls Out a 5-Cent Daily Tax To Access Social Media (time.com)
The government of Uganda is taxing social media users at a rate of 5 cents per day, which does not include the usual data fees. "The tax on users of sites such as Facebook was first proposed by long-time leader Yoweri Museveni, who complained of online gossip in a March letter that urged finance minister to raise money 'to cope with the consequences,'" reports Time. From the report: Service providers, including regional telecommunications giant MTN, said in a joint statement Sunday that starting July 1 the levy would be charged on "Over The Top services," including access to websites such as Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn. The tax will be deducted by service providers that will then pay to the government revenue service. Amnesty International urged Ugandan authorities to scrap the tax, calling it "a clear attempt to undermine the right to freedom of expression" in the East African country. From the social media levy the government hopes to collect about Shs400 billion (about $100 million) in the current financial year.
Uganda be kidding me!
I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
Bear in mind that many places in rural Uganda have shops where you can buy phone top ups for the local currency equivalent of 25 cents, 5 cent tax per day is a *massive* tax for a lot of Ugandans.
One must first define social media.
Am I the only one who sees a "pay-as-you-go-model" like this as a result of the new privacy restrictions being imposed by the EU and state of California? The model of this story is a tax, but if advertisers can't find their targets and start withdrawing ads, does anyone else think sites like FB or Instagram might use something like this? Just a question.
"Freedom of expression" --> "We need free access to feed you our ads/propaganda"
In the US they ought to charge at least a dollar a minute to compensate you for consuming their bullshit.
This is giving US ISPs a case to stand on for when they decide to charge users for specific services they want to access now that Net Neutrality is gone.
It strips your privacy in exchange for a false sense of belonging.
So your boyfriend is fat.
Who cares?
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
This is about the equivalent of a soda tax.
Both sugar and the internet can make one unhealthy.
One man's vice is another man's revenue stream.
--
"Look on the bright side, it'll be dark soon." -- Midnight Sun
Many countries have nationalised healthcare, where the costs of alcohol/tobacco related health issues are supposed to be paid for by the taxes on those products...
http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
Given that most web pages these days contain links to SM (Facebook, Twitter, ...) often a link to the SM logo or a bit of javascript.
So the person might not knowingly have anything to do with SM but I suspect that their browser downloading these small components will be seen as access to SM and so trigger the day's tax. Now that HTTPS is pervasive it is not possible to determine *what* is being accessed within a web site.
The only way that people are going to be able to avoid this is by installing browser plugins like request policy - which, in itself, is no bad thing.