Slashdot Mirror
German Police Accused of Carrying Out Some Pretty Stupid Raids (bleepingcomputer.com)
Catalin Cimpanu, writing for BleepingComputer: Two privacy-focused organizations have this week accused German police of carrying out raids at their offices and members' private homes on some pretty shoddy reasoning that makes no sense and hints at the police's abuse of power. The first of these organizations is Zwiebelfreunde, a non-profit group based in Dresden that runs Tor relay servers and supports privacy and anonymity projects by providing legal and financial help. One of the ways it helps these projects includes collecting donations from European users into its bank account and then relaying the raised money to overseas projects. Today, members of the Zwiebelfreunde project revealed that German police had raided their Dresden office and the homes of three members located in the cities of Augsburg, Jena, and Berlin. The raids took place on June 20, and police told Zwiebelfreunde members they were in relation to the RiseUp project, a provider of anonymous XMPP and email services.
They don't like it when you as an individual "go dark", but they can't stand it when you start teaching others to do it too and will use all manner of "persuasion" up to and including "facilitating child pornography" just because you believe in communications that are both convenient and secure.
How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
Just reading that brief description is enough to make me think that group is suspicious. Tor & money donations, overseas money distribution? It just smacks of money laundering to me. I doubt the police would raid on that alone they probably have some tip or informant that's backing up that suspicion.
Nonsense, police abusing their power, with or without orders from above, is a perfectly normal police behaviour in capitalist states. They never needed help from people standing in whatever relation to one of the former so-called socialist states which sported their own brand of secret police back in the times.
Like all credible citizen movements the Chaos Computer Club has moved from being perceived as a smelly group of hippies to a respected independant organization that helps keep some sanity in the public debate on IT and laws concerning it.
However, that the police behave as a bunch of stupid douchebags when it comes to dealing with the CCC is classic stuff. We've had this since the 80ies and as someone who sympathizes with them I always keep a backup of my data hidden in some unusual place in case some idiot thinks that because I use the CLI I'm some evil hacker or something and comes to take all my hardware.
"Guns are real, blue uniforms are real, cops are social fiction." - Robert Anton Wilson
My two eurocents.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
Sounds like the usual, money is changing hands and the government isn't getting their cut.
Nonsense, the police and justice is governed by the states, so in this case Söder is the main culprit. That is the man, that just tried to topple Merkel. The police and justice in Bavaria is also known for their close ties to the CSU and their willingness to go after all, that work against the CSU or their 'spezis' (people who bribe the CSU).
Because the least you could've done was fish up the CCC press release and add that as a link.
Consider the Stasi from the 1950-60's. How they stopped to look at all publication, movement, communications.
The Stasi could not trust their own workers politically and any existing law enforcement in the wider East Germany.
When East Germany was more confident in its ability to keep watch over people it allowed more select people more visits and trips from the West.
Why? The Stasi then had enough informants and their own new trusted surveillance in place to allow such meetings and visits.
Bait and as a trap under constant watch.
Before that the Stasi had to act quickly on any information. Just like the German police doing "raids" in 2018.
The German police are at point with new telco technology that they don't like and don't understand.
The work of the NSA, GCHQ, BND is well understood. Total collection, junk encryption used by computers in Germany.
The difficulty for the German police is they have too many internal domestic and very German political problems.
They cant trust their own staff as too many politically correct staff got hired on demographics have now entered the German police without any consideration for German security.
That has totally weakened decades of once West German and now German internal security inside the German police force. Nothing stays a secret within the German police as its own new workers walk information out.
The German police have to act too quickly using very limited legal telco support services.
The tools allowed for the German police to work on domestic telco networks legally are not useful in 2018. Reports that end in a phone number and an ip range.
A modern pen register https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... so the German police never get too powerful, smart or political again.
German police need BND tools to enter computer networks in real time and see content not just get an ip range from a telco/ISP.
Nobody would detect such remote access and no raid would show any police work was done.
The result is German police can respond to an ip range legally. They know its not what they need but its all they can legally get.
When all the German law allows is to find an ip range, the police go back to look into every ip. Quickly before the information walks back to new staff who have filled the lower ranks of the German police.
What german police need is something like a new GCHQ "Spy Smurfs" for todays phone networks.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/... (Jan 27 2014)
Tracker Smurf for location.
Nosey Smurf for that live mic.
Dreamy Smurf to get power on when the user has selected "power" off.
With such modern tools the German police would never need to show anything ongoing by doing such raids.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Spezls.
>Here’s a small sample of what Congress funded through the Broadcasting Board of Governors (through Radio Free Asia and then through the Open Technology Fund) between 2012 and 2014:
>LEAP, an email encryption startup, got just over $1 million. LEAP is currently being used to run secure VPN services at RiseUp.net, the radical anarchist communication collective.
>Open Whisper Systems, maker of free encrypted text and voice mobile apps like TextSecure, RedPhone, and Signal, got a generous $1.35-million infusion.
Because in all probability they will, as always, get away with it, while innocent citizens will perhaps even be prosecuted, instead of being properly compensated.
Reports in the German press made it very clear that those raids very probably were illegal, not the activities of the attacked group. Police even said the group hadn't been under suspicion in the first place, they allegedly were raided because they were thought to have evidence in a case against someone else.
And the group was using RiseUp as a platform for transferring funds only because one of the NGOs they were helping to collect money for uses only that as a payment option. There were and are no hints of "money laundering" whatsoever. On the contrary, groups like the one that was attacked here typically rather belong to circles which strongly oppose and help fight corruption and money laundering.
But in Germany's case, the police are a lot more politically structured and controlled than in America.
They even found powdery substances in one room (for etching PCB), concluded that the CCC must be building a bomb and even seized a model of printed. Actually it was a 3D print of Fat Man and a few inches / cm long.
https://twitter.com/annalist/s...
The print translates to:
"Offense: Inducing an Explosion with explosives
"Site of crime: Augsburg
"Time of crime: 2018-06-20
Object (diverse)
red, 3D-Print, likely model of an atomic bomb"
Yes, its true. No, it's not actually funny but police is framing the CCC as a criminal organisation.
One of the ways it helps these projects includes collecting donations from European users into its bank account and then relaying the raised money to overseas projects.
Uhm, that's just how basic money laundering works.... So that could certainly be a basis for doing a raid if it's not clear where the money came from.
They {...} will use all manner of "persuasion" up to and including "facilitating child pornography" just because you believe in communications that are both convenient and secure.
Fuck you, {...etc...} PEDOPHILE!
It might be some random coprolalia-affected troll, but in the current context of this thread, there might by some "wooshing" sound that got lost somewhere.
Post should get some "+1, Funny" love by mods, in my humble opinion.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
If you're "securing communications" for people who then use it for child porn, you are opening yourself up to being accused of that no matter your alleged altruistic intentions.
Hey, you know, what else those evil child pornographer are using ?
Digital photocamera, SD cards, computers, internet, printers, paper.
They might even sometime wear clothes, and eat food !
Ban all of the above, because pedo-peddlers might by using it too !!!~~
The purpose of tools like Tor, GPG, OTR, Axolotl, etc. is to help guarantee privacy and secure communication. It might be abused by people with nefarious intention, but it also has tons of legitimate reasons (think find a away accroos the Chinese Great Firewall, think protecting from corporate espionage, think whistle blower who want to help journalist report on a scandal, etc.)
These are useful tools.
You shouldn't deprive people from their everyday usefulness, just because the tools might fall in the hands of some criminal.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
They may be, but I fear that doesn't make them that much better... By the way, German law is continually being changed towards less restrictions for the police, towards police getting more protection against citizens, instead of better protecting citizens against unlawfully acting police, while the latter has more and more become normality in Germany (as about everywhere else). And government and politics – even the moderate German left – reliably come to their defence and tend to antagonize criticism and cover even the most blatant police misbehaviour.
German Police is independent of the central government and run by the different states in Germany. Therefore, Merkel has nothing to do with it. Furthermore, would that be first the duty of the minister for the interior.
You tellin' me German police abused their power? Gestapo out of here!
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
And in non capitalistic states they just murder you
Not the German people (the indigenous Germans), that's for sure.
This is another example of the control of free speech by the criminals in power.
...is a thought crime. If you know of or hear of anyone being private, report them to the thought police immediately. Failure to do so is harbouring a criminal and leaves you subject to prosecution and enhanced interrogation.
If you don't want your browsing habits and some other data to be tracked by facebook, Google, LinkedIN and other advertising companies, it's become a necessity to use secure connections.
Ghostery, uBlock and others are great and all, but it's getting to the point where they aren't cutting it with all tracking and surveillance out there.
And this article show's EXACTLY why "if you do nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about" is bullshit. It's gotten to the point where wanting privacy and staying off of social media is being considered kooky and suspicious.
"capitalist states". I doubt that police abuse is confined to capitalist states. Are you seriously claiming police in say Russia and China are more circumspect. I have absolutely no knowledge of these affairs but collecting and re-distributing funds could easily be money laundering depending on the sources and destinations. As usual the devil is in the details - blanket claims of police misconduct or stupidity are hardly persuasive.
Furthermore, would that be first the duty of the minister for the interior. ...
Which is Seehofer, who just had a bitch fight with Merkel over some nonsense
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
"German law is continually being changed towards less restrictions for the police, towards police getting more protection against citizens..."
You may know more about it than I do, but I lived there for half a dozen years in the 80-90s, and the police appeared to have pretty broad authority back then.
Just another day in Paradise
Yeah, but it's not like the Germans to employ Gestapo tactics.
I have absolutely no knowledge of these affairs but collecting and re-distributing funds could easily be money laundering
It's easy to obtain that knowledge. Riseup clearly state that:
the police looked at Riseup’s donate page and found we accept donations in Europe through a non-profit organization (“Verein”) based in Germany called Zwiebelfreunde. They decided this meant that Riseup was run by this organization (it is not), and so aggressively targeted this organization.
In Germany accepting donations through a non-profit third-party is not considered money laundering.
"perfectly normal police behaviour in capitalist states" indeed! Just as in totalitarian states, communist states, authoritarian states, fascist states, and your presumed utopic socialist states, too. Hm... noticing the repeated word? I'm starting to see a pattern here.
Then again, in a truly capitalist state, if ever there were such a thing, the police would barely exist, as there would be very little public money for them. Sadly, such a place does not exist in our world.
Might makes right irrelevant.
Of course the police would still exist - they would simply be private police charged only with protecting and pursing the interests of their wealthy employers. Private property beyond what you can carry exists only with the threat of violence, and the wealthy aren't about to surrender their wealth.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
"But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: ..."
You are all cows. Cows say moo. MOOOOOOO! MOOOOOOO! Moo cows MOOOOOO! Moo say the cows. YOU BAVARIAN COWS!!
Luckily it is easy to carry an RPG with you, which is why the first thing places with little freedom do is take away serious weapons.
If you are disarmed the wealthy don't have to work hard to protect themselves.
You should look up the Pinkerton Detective Agency and how big they were in the 19th century, and then consider that they were only one of the multiple private police forces that existed.
By capitalist states, I'd assume the poster meant the west where we're supposed to have the rule of law and respect for rights. In the various authoritarian states, it is natural to expect heavy handed police actions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
I see you've been reading David Freedman's The Machinery of Freedom! Indeed, you make an excellent point. What you describe is, however, more like a libertarian fantasy (an unworkable one, imho, for certain specific reasons) than it is simply a capitalist society. Capitalism still implies some form of government, and, as such, a police force, but one focused on defending individual rights. If one considers one's body to be one's own property (and I would think it odd to think otherwise), then the whole of the law would indeed consist in defending property rights. If only life could be so simple.
The threat of violence is ever present if once aims to stop thieves from plundering one's belongings. You presumption that only "the wealthy" would be interested in preventing uninvited looters from entering their homes strikes me as a shade dogmatic. Indeed, force would be required to prevent theft, be it sanction by the power of the state or not. Force is required to enable theft, too.
Might makes right irrelevant.
Yes and I'm SURE that police abusing their authority NEVER happened in the USSR. (Eye Roll)
Vinegar joe is a whiny nazi faggot of no consequence, so his whiny bullshit is exactly what WE can expect from the Stupid Bitch. Yep.
Never heard of it.
I don't believe only the wealthy would be interested - but that only the wealthy would be able to afford a private police force sufficiently dedicated to their job to do any good.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
That is a shame. Well, at least now you have.
You are correct that this species you have labeled "the wealthy" possess disproportionate resources to dedicate to protecting their belongings. Then again, they also possess disproportionate wealth to protect, so it kinda makes sense.
As you think all this through, please keep in mind that your local police force is mostly funded by your the local community. What this means is that cops who serve wealthier communities are better equipped, better trained, and just better, since these forces can afford to pay better salaries. Add to this the fact that people are free to live in the community they choose, and what you get is essentially very similar to a privatized police force, paid by the people it serves. Not saying it's good or bad, right or wrong... but these appear to be the facts.
A side note: You should be careful what attributes you ascribe to "the wealthy", lest you, by some calamitous misfortune, one day find yourself among them.
Might makes right irrelevant.
âoeI know nothing! Mmmmnothing!â
How does an economic model affect the brutality of the police?
Communist countries have a reputation of brutal police crackdowns as well with many other economic models.
Perhaps the problem is the economic model but some other factor. Such as groups trying to enforce their power over others.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
behaviour in capitalist states.
LOL. Fucking troll.
behaviour in states.
FTFY.
pursing the interests of their wealthy employers.
The bigger problem, is the wealthy are also not going to be willing to surrender their source of wealth, which is your wealth.
We've had private security forces in the US without much government oversight. They gave the Gestapo a run for their money.
Hongkong in the 80s, usa prior to 1850s. Worked well economically in both
Spotted the closet racist. Come on buddy, we're all friends here, use the words you really wanted to use.
Honestly, I have no interest in any piece of fluff espousing capitalism as an ideal end goal. The entire concept of capitalism is that capital is the ultimate measure of value, which means that so long as inheritance exists, unrestrained capitalism can only end in a neo-aristocracy with minimal social mobility. The only chance for any other outcome would be a political system that explicitly and completely rejects any influence of money on politics - which I don't see how is possible.
Capitalism has much to offer, but only in counterpoint to something like communism, which enshrines the economic value of the common man. Either extreme on it's own is a recipe for disaster.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
Oh, and I ascribe only those attributes to"the wealthy that are clearly visible from their own actions. There are obviously individuals in any group whom such a stereotype unjustly tarnishes, but as a group the wealthy have shown time and again throughout history that they are the enemy of the people.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
In heaven, the Engineers are German, the Cooks are Italian, and the Police are British.
In hell, the Cooks are British, the Engineers are Italian, and the Police are German.
"capitalist states". I doubt that police abuse is confined to capitalist states.
Of course not, and it wasn't my intention to insinuate something like that. It's just my impression (and not just mine), that police forces in capitalist first-world states become more and more powerful, aggressive, fitted with more and more rights against the population, the less the capitalist economy is able to keep up widespread prosperity in those states.
Are you seriously claiming police in say Russia and China are more circumspect [...]
Surely not. Now, today Russia as well as China are capitalist states. But of course they weren't "more circumspect" earlier, either.
Schröder.
And the CSU is known to be close to 'braune' (brown = nazi uniform) sympathisers.
"The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
LotR? I don't remember that line.
Unless, of course, one considers the wealthy to be people, too.
Regardless, I don't consider wealth to be a problem, really. Poverty... now that we could discuss.
Might makes right irrelevant.
why is hard to understand to stupid fucks like you that the police does not exist to "fight crime" but to serve the ruling class?
easy actually, because of your own ignorance
Again, you are absolutely on point. I would never recommend any "piece of fluff" for your library. So anyway, try reading The Machinery of Freedom.
All irony aside, you're kinda not wrong about inheritance. It's a problem. The problem with this problem, however, is that the solutions that have thus far been proposed have ultimately resulted in problems much, much greater than this one, and mostly don't actually do much to solve the issue, anyway. People who have enough money to care about where it will go when they go where they can't take it tend to have the wherewithal to find ways through, around, and under whatever Kafkaesque system is designed to confiscate their wealth. The only real beneficiaries of the labyrinth tend to be legislators, lobbyists, and lawyers,
I don't pretend to have answers, but I do know what fails. And I believe I might at least have the right questions in hand.
Might makes right irrelevant.
I'm drafting an email to the both my local and Germany's information institutions. I donated to tails and now German police have my details for no reason. I'm wondering how this will play out under GDPR
And why is it so hard for stupid fucks like yourself to understand that there always has, and likely always will be a ruling class.
Even in the most communist of communist states, there were people with more power than the rest.
There is no governmental organization of man that has ever existed that did not have a disparity of power. Next stupid question.
I love that someone out there moderated you insightful for equating Merkel with the Stasi, a claim not only so fucking ignorant as to be insulting to the average person, but so fucking tone deaf to make someone who actually lived under the Stasi want to choke you. I'm not sure who's more disgusting, you or the twat waffle that moderated you positively.
Because we don't really know what the reasoning was -- only the target organization's claims about what that reasoning must have been.
In Germany, as in the US, to execute a search you need a warrant issued by a magistrate, specifying the places to be searched and methods of search to be used. They have to convince a judge that there's evidence to be found, but they don't have to lay out their entire reasoning to the target of the investigation.
I'm not saying that the warrants couldn't be based on stupid reasoning, or that the cops didn't engage in stupid behavior, particularly in the search of the associated hackerspace. It's almost guaranteed that if you mix "cops", "technology" and "search" something stupid is going to happen at some point in the proceedings. However we won't know if the reasoning behind the warrants is stupid until charges are brought against someone.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Are people really surprised? Or do most people here fake it so they can be outraged in a one sided way
When the wealthy grow their wealth by exercising their financial power to implicitly or explicitly support a system dedicated to transferring wealth upwards - they are active contributors to poverty. That is very much the case in the U.S., where real wages have been stagnant or declining for the lower 90% of the population for decades, while virtually all new wealth goes to the top 10%.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
Perhaps I will. Does it address how to manage assholes seeking to game the system? Without that any such discussion is pure fantasy.
Wealth taxes seem like they may have some of the answer - they perform the same investment-promoting function as managed inflation, without burdening the lower classes to nearly the same degree. Eliminating inflation also makes it much more difficult for businesses to hide the fact that they're continuously cutting their employee's pay.
Another bit would be to tax capital gains at the same rate as other income - it's hard to even pretend to have a fair system when the investor class is paying substantially lower taxes than the working class.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
It's interesting watching a generally tech-savvy community (like us here) adopt so much wilful ignorance.
(a repost of something I repied to someone in one of the threads of this ost).
Let's suppose that it turns out that donations your site (this, wikipedia, whatever) collects end up, after some investigation, further downstream, actively funding fundamentalist, violent terrorism, or something less sensational but equally bad if not worse, putting more fuel in the furnaces driving mass migration.
Why wouldn't law enforcement organisations taking their job go seriously go take a good hard look at who is inserting the pennies in this piggy bank?
(This form of crowd-assisted donation-for-a-good-cause-facade form of money laundering never ever happens in the real world of course, and we don't have a whole bunch of violent pseudo-state actors glean a meaningful part of their revenue come in through such activity. Totes doesn't happen. Right?)
I want net neutrality as much as the next Slashdotter. But trying to wheel out the idealist pristine versions of net neutrality ideology from days bygone, before it got abused to drive geopolitical-scale harm and mass migration from half a planet that failed at building functional states, and in the process belittling the challenges of modern day law enforcement (rather than understanding them and having a honest conversation about what realistic best-of-both-worlds mix of online rights and law enforcement can/should be achieved) is not intellectually honest. It's stoking an emotion inside ourselves by singing the hymn of one position in a discussion. It's our own little version of Alex Jones.
We can't will the problems modern day law enforcement are there to solve away by ignoring them and going all libertarian (and to those who do... you may whistle libertarian tunes, but you live in the world made liveable by the functioning state around you, I presume you're not where the mass migrations are coming from. If you want your libertarian fantasy so much, you can find the magic land of no law enforcement there...). The problems are here to stay. We have to understand and solve them.
-
The main people using encryption are people buying things from Amazon.
The real criminals are probably* using pencil and paper. Why not ban those?
* based on the assumption that most criminals are dumb fucks - clearly born out by a visit to your local penitentiary.
The actual incident was in Saxony, if I am not mistaken. They have a rather different view of history. Especially, in politics. If you know what I mean.
Immermann argued:
I don't believe only the wealthy would be interested - but that only the wealthy would be able to afford a private police force sufficiently dedicated to their job to do any good.
Look, the notion that a purely libertarian human society could ever exist for longer than say, six weeks or so (by which I mean, "just long enough for its inhabitants to begin acting like normal human beings"), aside, the model upon which you seen to be predicating your statement appears to disregard the reality that private, first-responder companies (the classic example being volunteer fire departments) have been formed to provide their services to subscribers for the past several millenia, at least.
You want protection from fires? Hire the local fire department to respond to them when you call. Pay extra, and you get a guaranteed response time, with specified financial penalties for failing to get their engine to your door within that time. And the same, I'm certain, would occur with police service in this theoretical society. Want protection from crime on the street? Hire one of the local security companies to patrol your neighborhood. They're pretty sure to offer premium protection services, too, but I'm dead certain they'd provide a basic, minimum level of protection against street crime within their service area as a subscription service.
(However, right about there, we find ourselves facing one of points where human rights smack head-first into the ideals of the libertarian society, because now we need a justice system to deal with captured miscreants. Without it, you leave the question of their dispositon to the whim of the captors - i.e. the police - or their subscribers, depending on what their contract specifies. There'd be no institutional, societally-mediated process for determining their guilt or innocence without imposing some form of government on the humans who live there, so where does that leave you, if you find yourself wrongly accused? Tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail, if you leave it up to a jury of the local residents who want to participate. If the police decide, you'd likely be robbed of the personal property you're carrying, beaten to a pulp, and dumped at the edge of town. Or just shot.)
Anyway, I'm just sayin' ...
(Posting as AC only so as not to undo prior upmods in this thread.)
--
Check out my novel ...
What do you think about the pics of Merkel gleefully marching with her commie comrades? Shaka, before the walls fell?
If you hate the Stasi so much, why do you embrace an "ex-commie" like Merkel who longs for the "good old days" you despise?
He is being racist to people who have no ethnicity. If they do exist, I choose to believe that they are a very forgiving people.
One of the cool features of repressive police states is that they're both heinously expensive to operate, and tend to severely retard the economy. So over a longish timeframe they are self-limiting.
I don't care if she's a commie or a libertarian. As long as she doesn't think it's OK to have state organs extrajudicially murdering dissidents, or controlling local populaces with the fear of being dragged in back of a building and shot, she's not a fucking Stasi. Is that hard?
The left:
"You don't need guns, the police will protect you"
"The police does a lot of unjust things" or straight "ACAB"
The right:
"Blue lives matter", "All cops are honorable perfect humans"
"Everyone should have a gun, just in case they're not"
Both sides have their contradictions, yet the latter makes a little more sense.
Yeah there are big controversis about Saxony, e.g. the police there wants to buy war weapons (like tanks and real machine guns), which is basically unthinkable in Germany.
Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
lotta comfort that is to the people who have to live through them
Whereas ethnic groups are forming 'no-go zones' all around Europe
That is code for muslims.
I'll admit it's possible that you may not understand the background rhetoric of 'no-go zones' in Europe, but I think it's far more likely that you're just another shitstain trying to put a veneer of euphemistic language atop your racists beliefs.