Slashdot Mirror


The World's Largest Phone Network China Mobile Censors Content -- Even in the United States (washingtonpost.com)

Isaac Stone Fish, reporting for The Washington Post: On Monday, the U.S. Department of Commerce recommended the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) deny a license to China Mobile, the state-run company that is the world's largest phone network by subscribers. (It reaches more people than Verizon and AT&T combined.) The Commerce Department suggested the move because of the national security risk China Mobile poses. Indeed, because China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state, there are legitimate concerns that Beijing could use it to gather data on American citizens. There is, however, a previously unreported concern with China Mobile that adds to worries about the company's suitability in the United States.

According to several interviews with frequent Chinese travelers to the United States, those with China Mobile as their carrier are often unable to access American websites and apps that are banned in China. A Chinese journalist who regularly travels to the United States for work, and who asked to speak anonymously, said she couldn't access Facebook or the New York Times in the United States with her China Mobile number. Even Google Maps is banned, leading to some frustrating travel experiences. When she was visiting a friend in Brooklyn, the Chinese journalist said, "it took me a long time to find her place because my VPN failed me and I couldn't use Google Maps." She was referring to a Virtual Private Network, a method that some Chinese use to circumvent the Chinese censorship apparatus.

61 comments

  1. Bigger problem by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Much bigger problem is that it isn't against the law for private corporations to censor. While we rightfully condemn China Mobile for blocking NYT, there is no law preventing, for example, AT&T from doing the same.

    1. Re: Bigger problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, but they lose safe harbor protection if they do.

    2. Re:Bigger problem by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Much bigger problem is that it isn't against the law for private corporations to censor. While we rightfully condemn China Mobile for blocking NYT, there is no law preventing, for example, AT&T from doing the same.

      Of course there is... there are net neutrali... oh yeah...

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:Bigger problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While we rightfully condemn China Mobile for blocking NYT, there is no law preventing, for example, AT&T from doing the same.

      Also known as the american "do as i say, not as i do"-doktrin...

    4. Re:Bigger problem by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      DoD blocks certain sites from getting to NIPRNet,,,no one calls that "censoring"

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    5. Re:Bigger problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could then rightfully condemn AT&T. NYT could perhaps sue the government for the lack of prevention of hampering the realization of their first amendment rights. Assuming there has ever been a positive view of the first amendment in the US.

    6. Re: Bigger problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no first amendment right issue. The cellphone carrier is not a governmental entity and can restrict speech however it wants (modulo any laws that have been put into place).

      If they did restrict speech in such a way, they deserve to be sued

    7. Re:Bigger problem by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      While it may not be against the law for AT&T to block a site. It does have to contend with Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile who would be more then willing to show that AT&T are blocking sites while they are not.
      This why the world didn't end when Net Neutrality was repealed. If these companies just started restricting sites, people would notice, and switch to those who do not.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Bigger problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The reason AT&T and the other major cellular carriers won't enact censorship is the people living in the US are allowed to loudly complain about such actions in public. Protests and attack campaigns hurt the bottom line of the company even if the protests and complaints have no basis.
      And sad to say but no evidence of wrong doing is required today. Accusations are good enough to proclaim a company or an individual guilty as charged. It's ironic that the people throwing around the accusations have no problem with trampling the rights of their designated target. "innocent until proven guilty" only applies to those people who agree with the protesters point of view. This has become acceptable because the accusers and their supporters believe they are 100% correct and their adversary is 100% wrong. They firmly believe once the evil doers are gone society will revert back to using reason, civility, and law. They totally forget their "enemy" will return the favor using the same tactics. The US government is in a total deadlock. The elected officials in DC , all of them, have betrayed the people they are suppose to be working for. And the elected officials seem to be blind to the potential consequences of their incompetence. Unless they stop pandering to the radical fringes on both sides of the political scale organized violence fill the void created by the absence of common sense and reason.

    9. Re:Bigger problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DoD blocks certain sites from getting to NIPRNet,,,no one calls that "censoring"

      you don't have access to my backup drives, so I am censoring you

    10. Re:Bigger problem by ole_timer · · Score: 1

      you pig - blocking me from your personal backups - how dare you?

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    11. Re: Bigger problem by nazsco · · Score: 1

      we should start a petition to either allow china mobile or enact true net neutrality. because free market and all that.

    12. Re:Bigger problem by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. IF it's ATT, you switch to Verizon, or any number of others. It's called a free market.

    13. Re:Bigger problem by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The unicorn free market where magic cable flies out of the unicorns butt to provide you a connection. You can only connect to the services provide at your location, no competition at all if you can only get one service and if you can get more expect a cartel to form from the two or three services you can get. Same bloated prices, same shitty services and when it comes to complaining, free market unicorns is what they scream at you.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:Bigger problem by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      And the best part is, the new SCOTUS nominee is for private censorship and against net neutrality. Yay.

  2. Shocking! Well, OK, not that shocking. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who is surprised by this? This is SOP for them and exactly what is expected. In all likelihood, it is a legal requirement for Chinese telecom services.

            China makes a lot of stuff, they act in some ways like a modern country, but in fact they are a communist totalitarian state - and now (with Li's "presidente for life" declaration) a dictatorship. This is what they are, and this is what they do.

  3. China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    We know this. Why not just ban all companies that are arms of the Chinese state? We know they're not to be trusted under any circumstances, so why allow them? Let them meet our standards or go fuck themselves full of rice.

    1. Re:China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      Because: anyone outsourcing to China has to deal with a Chinese state company; and, practically everyone, especially the current President of the United States, outsources to China. Therefore, banning Chinese state companies from doing business in the United States is a non-starter.

    2. Re:China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state by hackingbear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are a lot of state-own companies in China. In fact, there are too many that the Chinese government wants to get rid of, but they tried (mostly in the 1990's) but cannot privatize those companies because most of those companies are highly inefficient and privatize them would cost a lot of jobs. So I don't understand what's this fear of Chinese state-own companies is about? If state-owned companies are a thing of threats, then the Soviet Union would be ruling the world today. This is all fear mongering.

      By the way, China Mobil is not totally state-owned. They are a public trade company listed in Hong Kong Stock Exchange. And the company has to carry the mandate of the Chinese government to provide mobile network services to the remotest rural areas in China at an affordable price, unlike AT&T et. al, who couldn't even provide complete service coverage in Silicon Valley, so that would already damp its competitiveness.

    3. Re:China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is all fear mongering." - not really, no. Russia has used its Gazprom position as a weapon against Europe for Russian political efforts, in case you missed it. China puts backdoors in cell phone s/w regularly. No, this is threat assessing.

    4. Re:China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      in the other news, Iraq has WMDs.

    5. Re:China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state by mmdurrant · · Score: 1

      $$$$$ in contracts between US companies and Chinese firms would be a big reason in my view.

      --
      I see my shadow changing, stretching up and over me...
    6. Re:China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      If state-owned companies are a thing of threats...

      Bob Readerman of the New York Times raves: "James Patterson's A Thing of Threats is a riveting delve into the seedy underworld of state-owned companies. My buttcheeks literally did not unclench once as this gripping thriller wove its way through not one, not two, but—spoilers!—a whole thing of threats!! 5/5 - instant best seller and surprisingly effective glute workout."

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  4. The opposite is true for US travelers to China by magarity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if you have T-Mobile. Everything goes through t-mo's vpn so you have full access to all US sites that are normally blocked for Chinese. Although strangely enough, Google blocks downloadable / offline maps for China so you can only navigate as long as you have a good cell signal and don't go too fast.

  5. Just use WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    convenient workaround, no censorship.

  6. Duh by KPU · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's how mobile roaming works. Data is carried back to the mobile provider who then connects it to the Internet locally. US SIM cards block sites that are censored in the US. Film at 11.

    1. Re:Duh by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 2

      That's how mobile roaming works. Data is carried back to the mobile provider who then connects it to the Internet locally. US SIM cards block sites that are censored in the US. Film at 11.

      Yes, but that doesn't explain why a Chinese journalist in New York can't access Google : his data traffic is handled by the local mobile provider (say, AT&T), not by his Chinese "home" provider.

    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While roaming, the Chinese user would connect to the to Chinese home network provider's packet gateway through a roaming interconnect which would connect the user out via Chinese Internet, not AT&T's network connection.

      There isn't typically local breakout of Internet traffic to the roaming partner as operator specific services would break.

    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      exactly. and that's why for the same reason you can access Google, Facebook and Co inside China if you use a foreign SIM card - no VPN required.

    4. Re: Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also access Google in China on a Chinese SIM card if you register it as a foreigner.

  7. XKCD by chill · · Score: 2

    Ah! That explains today's XKCD comic.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:XKCD by zlives · · Score: 1

      hehehe, is this technology now available to shill...

  8. In America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... we prefer our censors and guardians of CorrectThink (tm) to be private corporations like Google, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, not the State!

  9. TOTALLY NORMAL for gsm/3g/4g data. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Informative

    if they had started to route the traffic directly through wherever they're roaming, that would be news.

    it works as if they were in china. that's how it's supposed to work. how on earth a journalist doesn't know this by now? they never travel?

    this is literally not news at all since this is just how it works. their data gets routed back to china and out from there. THATS HOW IT WORKS, the ping times go to fuck of course.

    also, it's usually prohibitely expensive anyways so.. eh. just look for wifi will you? or you want to pay thousands for 10 minutes of downloading updates? you wouldn't be doing that unless you had chinese government footing your mobile bill anyways.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  10. No risks each other. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For avoiding national security risks, the electronic devices must have the following properties:

    Backdoors free.
    Cryptography free.
    Lockers free.
    No hidden parts.
    No undocumented parts.
    No mistaken specifications (100% correctly specified).
    No binary parts without sources.
    Etc.

    National security is not only for U.S., it is also for China, Europe, etc.

  11. Why bother doing it themselves? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    All they have to do is make one quick call to the sales department over at Zuckerbook and they can buy access to the very-much-private-and-personal information of at least half of all U.S. citizens.

  12. And AT&T isn't an arm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of the US?

    1. Re: And AT&T isn't an arm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not. Next question.

    2. Re:And AT&T isn't an arm by zlives · · Score: 1

      its more like and anal cavity / back door at best.

    3. Re:And AT&T isn't an arm by zlives · · Score: 1

      or a more apt description would be, a paid for anal whore that will let some fuck its customers for a fee.

  13. Shocking by DewDude · · Score: 1

    Considering censorship is just what this administration wants you'd think they'd embrace this with open arms.

  14. Idiot article by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are roaming. This means, the data goes from the phone, to the cellular network, and then to the Internet from the cellular network.

    If you are on Verizon and roaming in China, your phone number is still your USA phone number, your IP is a USA based IP address, and your traffic goes from your phone, to Verizon, and then to facebook or google or whatever.

    If you are from China, on China Mobile, the same fucking thing applies. You are roaming. You maintain your phone number from China. Your network traffic goes from your phone, over to China Mobile's network, and exits that network. From there, you can go to Facebook or whatever - unless it's blocked by the Great Firewall of China.

    This is how fucking roaming works. WTF, people?!

    How the fuck is this even an issue or discussion?!?!

    1. Re:Idiot article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my US farm, they haven't slaughtered the sheeple...yet.

    2. Re:Idiot article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, if China Mobile is blocked by the FCC, these journalists will get *no* service in the US. What's going to upset them more? Being just as restricted as they are in China, or being unable to roam?

      I get that the DoC wants to pressure China, but China's not about to relax their censorship just to give their roaming citizens access to things they wouldn't get back home. It's never going to happen. This is idiotic.

    3. Re:Idiot article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.... It all has to do with the number you have to call to get network services. I bet WiFi doesn't have this problem. No word about that.

  15. Data Breakout by Tim12s · · Score: 1

    When roaming, all data goes to your country of origin and breaks out from that point of origin.

    For China Mobile, the users will be restricted by the great firewall because its as if they are in China.

  16. How to get approved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China mobile just needs to add FAKE NEWS sites to the banned list. Perhaps they could use Trump's twitter history to compile such a list. That would probably help their application for a license.

  17. Gather data on US citizens. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Indeed, because China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state, there are legitimate concerns that Beijing could use it to gather data on American citizens.

    That's the NSA's job.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  18. Now the Chinese trolls are coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To scream that it is racist to deny a Chinese company access to American markets, even though China denies access by Western companies.

  19. Oh oh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    This means that a big fat payment to the Lord of the US is in order. Pay the price, and all will be well

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  20. Works well for a Plutocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... we prefer our censors and guardians of CorrectThink (tm) to be private corporations like Google, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, not the State!

    All of which works brilliantly for a plutocracy. While they have us fighting each other over abortion rights and gun control, they quietly laugh all the way to the bank and censor anything that might really shake up the status quo. Or at least did, until a foreign power used a corrupt set of politicians, a malignantly narcissistic real estate con man, and an extreme right-wing coalition of neo-Nazis, Christians, white-supremacists, and Libertarians to completely upset the apple-cart. Now that they own the executive branch, and the FCC will allow right-wing corporate takeovers and buyouts of an increasing share of our media, we've moved from a plutocracy (bad) to corporate fascism (far worse), all without a single shot being fired. It seems unlikely we'll get our freedom back in such a stealthy way, alas.

  21. US Hypocrisy by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    "China Mobile is an arm of the Chinese state"

    Snowden showed that US tech companies are also an arm of the state. It may be less willing, but it's no less intrusive.

  22. But Ajit said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ending net neutrality would allow companies to innovate, ie, build out capacity to LET you stream 720p and better!

    Oh, right- he's a massive liar and corporate tool.

  23. Tell the people to rise up by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Overthrow the Chinese government, toss them out on their ears. Oh wait! It's a COMMUNIST dicatorship...that means the people have NO WAY to overthrow that kind of government. Oh well, so sorry.

  24. Ol Olsoc = fake name massive human fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Your MASSIVE FAIL in this life is you're nothing more than a chattering little do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" online & you know it...

    * Is that the best your "phantasyland FAKE NAME" (for your fake lie of a so-called 'life') can manage?

    When a FAKE NAME do nothing like YOU does better than I have? Then talk (you're all talk & no action)...

    You can't help you're an immature little BUTTHURT no-mind, lol! I blew you away in TONS OF PLACES and easily dust your no-mind bullshit blatherings.

    APK

    P.S.=> The TRUE PRICE of your UNIDENTIFIABLE FAKE NAME do-nothing selves like you that I can ALWAYS CASH IN ON (lol) is that I can use FACT/TRUTH on them to SHATTER their all TOO fragile delusional egos that they actually know A DAMN THING in computing, lol... apk

    1. Re:Ol Olsoc = fake name massive human fail by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      See subject: Your MASSIVE FAIL in this life is you're nothing more than a chattering little do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" online & you know it...

      There was a young man from Nantucket

      Who carried his balls in a bucket

      He saw a dead deer, and he said - "I'm no queer"

      "But just the same I think I'll make some Venison Sausage."

      What did you think I was going to write?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  25. Owned, schmowned, pwned by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    Again, this is a totalitarian state. State-owned or not, they exist to serve the ends of the government. They are not independent entities in any way.

          All the communist states figure out that state-owned/planned operations are inefficient and donot work, usually pretty quickly. To first approximation, they wouldn't care, but if the business is not working, there are a lot less profits to steal for themselves. So they quickly adopt *fascist* models, where the businesses are ostensibly free to operate independently and efficiently, but only in service to the state with massive payoff to the big-shots running the show. Of course this is what Marx and his buddies called "social parasites" and is the opposite of what the claim to believe, but the communist approach does nicely keep everyone else from wanting or expecting more. If they do, Tianamen Square time.

    This sequence was repeated over and over. Vlad Putin (and his predecessors back to Stalin, and Mao) didn't get fabulously rich by following the Communist philosophy to the letter, they got it by running a classic kleptocracy. China is by far the best at it so far. So it matters not one whit who supposedly owns something, or whether they are traded on exchanges, they will do the state's bidding, ultimately.

  26. China censors, US taxes by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 1

    US collects taxes from the income US citizen have abroad. It seems that US thinks that pay taxes is the most important obligation citizen have to state. (all other contries typically don't do so, and let country where person made money tax him),
    China apparenly thinks that right order of thoughts is the most important obligation to state. So it censors its citizens even abroad.

  27. This is a consequence of how cell networks work. by segin · · Score: 1

    Data sessions are routed back to the core network of the network issuing your SIM; you'll find that you can access region-locked content whilst internationally roaming if using mobile data. Only on a few outdated networks are you actually using that network's gateway whilst roaming.