Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Suspended 70 Million Accounts In Past Two Months, Says Report (theverge.com)

According to The Washington Post, Twitter has suspended 70 million accounts in the past two months as part of a crackdown on malicious activity on its platform. "The rate of suspensions for May and June is reportedly twice the company's October 2017 suspension rate," reports The Verge. From the report: In a blog post last month, Twitter said it had been working to improve its safety policies, and that its "systems identified and challenged more than 9.9 million potentially spammy or automated accounts per week."

The Post reports that the change in enforcement could cause a decline in users for the company's second quarter, although a Twitter executive told the publication that many of the accounts rarely tweeted, and would therefore not dramatically impact the company's active user count. A Twitter spokesperson said in a statement to The Verge that the company noted in its first-quarter shareholder letter this year that âoeongoing information quality effortsâ had negatively impacted monthly users, and that the efforts could continue to impact user numbers in the future.

79 comments

  1. correct the record? by arbiter1 · · Score: 0

    So many of them belonged to super pac's like Correct the record that were used to by pac's to troll people?

    1. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, clearly the accounts belonged to to russian hackers.

      Now that the interference has finally been dealt with it is time for Hillary in 2020.

      #HerTurn

    2. Re:correct the record? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Dude, get a clue: People even accepted getting the annoying orange as a prez to avoid her.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice try russia

    4. Re:correct the record? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Some of them fit that description. You can't reach those people. But some of them are a different kind of idiot, the kind happy to do something, anything, even if it doesn't make sense, in the hope of an upset. Some of those people would have voted for Sanders (you know, the registered Democrats' choice for Democratic candidate) and said so loudly, then went on to loudly support Trump. Those people can be reached, with a sufficiently populist candidate, as Sanders proved.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if most of them hardly ever tweeted, how were they malicious and spammy??? was it a russian sounding name that made them malicious?

    6. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't like her either, but more than half the voters voted for her.

    7. Re: correct the record? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Just Californians. So many of you packed into those crowded spaces. It makes sense that you would all vote nutty.

    8. Re:correct the record? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 0

      Still, if HRC had won, USA would have had elected a leader who (at least at one point) had a >50% approval rating. Instead they elected a leader who will never get above 43%. That's not just a failure of democracy, that's a failure of basic math, and an indication that something is very rotten in your country.

    9. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Instead they elected a leader who will never get above 43%

      Just like he never had more than a 1% of winning.

      Hell, even 43% is damn impressive given the constant propaganda by mainstream media. He's not that for off from Obama at the same time in his presidency and who got fellated non-stop and kept out of as many scandals as possible.

    10. Re:correct the record? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's not just a failure of democracy, that's a failure of basic math, and an indication that something is very rotten in your country.

      The USA is not and never has been a democracy. It is a republic on paper (which is a half-assed kind of "democracy" in which your votes don't really count anyway) and an oligarchy in fact. When it was founded, only racially privileged landowners had any vote at all, just like in ancient Greece. And just like ancient Rome, the dominant forces upon public opinion are bread and circuses.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extremely few liked her, but almost half of all voters showed they are incapable of voting anything but Democrat, no matter the circumstances.

    12. Re:correct the record? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hell, even 43% is damn impressive given the constant propaganda by mainstream media.

      No, 43% is damned pathetic given the constant propaganda by Faux News, the only channel that his supporters watch and/or believe. They are constantly jerking him off, but his approval is still that low?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re: correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No "bing" you're just a jealous faggot who will never matter, that's all. Get over yourself and die before anyone cares what you say, fucking moron.

    14. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody who disagrees with me is wrong and stupid too!

      Signed,
      Geniuses who for some reason can't win any elections

    15. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, this didn't put them off either.

    16. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is not and never has been a democracy.

      You're wrong. The United States of America, was an is a Republic, but the seats of government were abandoned and THE UNITED STATES (all caps, no 'of America') currently rules the land as a de-facto government established by the Act of 1871 by which Lincoln ensured the Civil War debt by making everyone an indentured servant to the federal municipal corporation titled THE UNITED STATES. This new corporate government was set up under war powers, and modeled itself after the original Republic, but it is a Corporation run by Democratic bylaws.

      You are part of the problem, unfortunately. You see, if patriots such as yourself would actually research history you'd see why the constitutional rights of the Republic of the United States are ignored by your defacto government. You would then be able to re-inhabit the actual seats of congress which were abandoned, and actually live in a country governed by a Republic. However, since you foolishly regurgitate ignorant and factually incorrect bullshit like, "The USA is not and never has been a democracy", you remain neutered and powerless to change anything. Your enemies will not truly correct you for fear of waking a seeping giant.

      The truth is: Your apathy has allowed USA to be governed by a Corporate Democracy, a Federal Municipal Corp which owns D.C. (which is why its not part of the 50 states). You are wrong and should feel bad about it.

    17. Re:correct the record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. you are such shits we threw trump at you.

      that's how pissed people are.

      and you still haven't wised up one damm bit! that's fucking amazing.

    18. Re: correct the record? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Why the homophobia? Does the idea that a guy might find you attractive scare you?

    19. Re:correct the record? by Raenex · · Score: 0

      But some of them are a different kind of idiot, the kind happy to do something, anything, even if it doesn't make sense, in the hope of an upset.

      So tell me what would have been better about a Clinton presidency. Would it have been Libya 2.0 in Syria? Staying with the joke that is the Paris Climate Accords? More Muslim immigration? More illegal immigrants? More Hillary hacking and coughing her way around the world, falling down some more stairs?

      Oh, that's right, she would have been more "presidential".

    20. Re:correct the record? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm, right?

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  2. Happened to me as well. by DeBaas · · Score: 2

    Happened to me as well a few times. Their algorithms need some work.
    Biggest issue is that the unlock via a text message doesn't work (for me). You first have to click a captcha, then they want to send you a text to the number you registered. That then fails, with the message that they can't text to your carrier, even though I confirmed that number by a text sent by them... Then it takes support 2-3 days to unlock your account with apologies and the message that they don't reply to emails.

    Not a big thing, it's just twitter, but crappy nonetheless for such a big name in social media

    --
    ---
    1. Re:Happened to me as well. by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      One thing is for sure, when 9.9 million accounts get suspended per month, the innocent will have no avenue of recourse because nobody is going to field millions of support requests on the matter. Someone famous may be an exception that proves the rule.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Happened to me as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing is for sure, when 9.9 million accounts get suspended per month, the innocent will have no avenue of recourse because nobody is going to field millions of support requests on the matter. Someone famous may be an exception that proves the rule.

      Adding insult to injury, "[Twitter] challenged more than 9.9 million potentially spammy or automated accounts per week." They actively promotion creating "tweetbots" to auto-respond / retweet messages. I had an account suspended for a blog that I wrote and no way to reactivate the account; certainly no recourse.

    3. Re:Happened to me as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happened to me as well a few times

      Twitter locked you up a few times?

      Spill the beans, pal --- You must be a mouth-breather Republican, ain't ya?

      We Liberals will never be locked up by anyone. Facebook, Twitter, Youtube all adore us.

    4. Re:Happened to me as well. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why would you give Twitter your phone number? :O

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  3. Only 70 Million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why not 700 million? Why not all of them especially the POTUS?
    The world would be a far better place if Twitter ceased to exist today.

  4. Not me! Cause FUCK ALL Y'ALL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that I really use Twatter for much anyways.

    Per Alec Guiness: It's a wretched hive of scum and villainy.

  5. So what's the use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    70 million accounts purged that "rarely tweeted". So they killed a lot of accounts people set up to automate tweeting new blogposts or something. How is this a "crackdown on malicious activity"?

    1. Re:So what's the use? by MrMr · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing 'failing to read' is considered malicious inactivity by the advertisers.

  6. Re:now if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please cite a post he has made that and the particular term of service it violated.

  7. Thanks Twitter by AndyKron · · Score: 0

    They got rid of 70 million accounts nobody gave a fuck about anyway. Thanks Twitter for making our world a little bit safer.

    1. Re:Thanks Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know no one cared about them? Was your deleted too? Now you have an excuse as to why no one follows your punk ass on social media.

  8. Jude Law by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    There's plenty more where they came from.

    Why am I reminded of that scene from Enemy At The Gate?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Jude Law by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      There's plenty more where they came from.

      Why am I reminded of that scene from Enemy At The Gate?

      "Honey? the Visigoths are here. They want to know if you can come out to play?"

      dunno why that just popped into my head.

      Anyhow, I know everyone is going off on Politics, but I'l bet a lot of these accounts are leftovers from the services that would get followers for you in a weird Twitter popularity contest for some coin.

      I'll bet after the purge, Kim Cardassian is no longer the most popular person on Twitter. The family will probably sue Twitter now.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  9. Hereâ(TM)s a novel idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get rid of Twitter.

    1. Re:Hereâ(TM)s a novel idea... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And how are we going to know whether the US still has a president without it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Hereâ(TM)s a novel idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, he'll be
      - Imposing new tariffs in the trade war with China
      - Buying a new Golf Course somewhere in the world
      - Issuing press releases telling the US that everything will be wonderful, tremendous and the rest.
      - Appearing on Fox News to tell his voters that is 'draining that swamp' etc etc etc

    3. Re:Hereâ(TM)s a novel idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't "gassing the kikes" on that list?

    4. Re: Hereâ(TM)s a novel idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, maybe because he's a strong supporter of Israel?

    5. Re: Hereâ(TM)s a novel idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT'S why he sold those billions of dollars of weapons to the House of Saud who avow and support the destruction of Israel. BIGLY friends of the House of Heebs. BIGLY.

  10. But ISIS is still there.... by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    things that make you go um...

  11. Hypocrites forever by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

    As long as they fail to shut down Trump's account, they are willfully ignoring their own policies in order to remain relevant. Selective enforcement is always used for covert abuse. Twitter is a Trump supporter.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the fuck up/ all you pussies are so butthurt that trump beat hillary, that all you do is whine and cry about anything related to the potus. grow the fuck up. change the system instead of complaining like a bitch on her rag.

    2. Re:Hypocrites forever by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      As long as they fail to shut down Trump's account, they are willfully ignoring their own policies in order to remain relevant. Selective enforcement is always used for covert abuse. Twitter is a Trump supporter.

      They wanted to shut Emperor Bonespurs down, but Bob Mueller called and told them he wasn't done collecting evidence yet.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's funny to me is that they think they are changing the system by crying about it online or marching in the streets. The people in charge need to stop listening to these lunatics. Trump doesn't listen to them. That's why I'll vote for him again.

    4. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they fail to shut down Trump's account, they are willfully ignoring their own policies in order to remain relevant. Selective enforcement is always used for covert abuse. Twitter is a Trump supporter.

      The very problem with this approach is that Trump could make life very difficult if Twitter does ban his accounts, at least during his presidency in the white house.

    5. Re:Hypocrites forever by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The people in charge need to stop listening to these lunatics. Trump doesn't listen to them. That's why I'll vote for him again.

      You'll vote for him because you're a racist, and possibly a neo-Nazi. It's impossible to vote for Trump without being deeply, personally racist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DIPSHIT. It isn't 2008 anymore and you don't win stupid internet arguments by pulling out your magic race card at the earliest opportunity. I know you're a fucking idiot, that's obvious, but it's still true and you must learn.

    7. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the upside, the magatards have been a lot more quiet.

      Lot less bots to lead the dipshits around by their nose.

    8. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hypocrite morons are not a race...

    9. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people in charge need to stop listening to these lunatics. Trump doesn't listen to them. That's why I'll vote for him again.

      You'll vote for him because you're a racist, and possibly a neo-Nazi. It's impossible to vote for Trump without being deeply, personally racist.

      Americans are weird. You weirdos....

    10. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine being so servile that you'd embrace a bot as some kind of insightful leader.

    11. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nazi - the one n-word racists will not abide.

    12. Re:Hypocrites forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. There were a few handy bots that would repost my fake news daily that got canned. I'll have to make some more I guess :/

  12. Ban all the white male CIS SCUM !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all the nazis and toxic violent right wingers

    Right on brothers!

    Capcha: benign

  13. So much for free speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't have it on the internet.

    Now you know what these people's true feelings are. They would love the SOVIET UNION.

    1. Re:So much for free speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations are not people my friend and neither are bots.
      In a healthy society they don't get free speech.

  14. Twitter "measures" are so much bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and political pandering to the "Russian" hysteria.

    They shut down half of their Bulgarian active base just because Bulgaria (an EU country) uses cyrillic.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-44252785

    The American liberal idiocy is as hilarious as the American liberal illiteracy.

  15. A token gesture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were serious about removing the bots and automated accounts the simplest way would be turn off the API systemwide and put CAPTCHA tests with 2FA for all logins, but then i suspect the true number of human users would not impress investors.

  16. Re:now if only.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

    Please cite a post he has made that and the particular term of service it violated.

    You might be a Nazi... if you support Donald Trump. Or put another way, here's your sign.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Re: now if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And drinkypoo might be a child molester. The investigation is still ongoing.

  18. Re: now if only.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

    And drinkypoo might be a child molester. The investigation is still ongoing.

    And you are definitely a coward, and committing libel. Run along, libelous coward.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. Keep going! by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    until they suspend 100% of their accounts. I'm pretty sure violence will drop slightly and people will gain a few IQ points in the process.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  20. Define malicious? by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    Is it just blatent illegal activity or just part of the "war on information"? I'm guessing a bit of both.

  21. Private Business Acitivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boohoo. Not a public forum. Eat a cock rightards. Buy your own servers if you want speech.

  22. Re: Protip for a Stupid Yankee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only Americans rant about "liberals".

    If you want to pretend not to be an American you have to stop speaking like one if you want anyone to believe your lies.

  23. Re: No he's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you support Trump youre a pussygrabbing nazi and we all think you have excrement for brains.

    -Love,
    The Rest of the Fucking Planet

  24. Re: Some Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gerrymandering
    Voter supression laws
    American Public Education is 37th in the world

    But you'll love being African-poor! BIGLY.

  25. Re: Why didnt you PAY for hosting?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Youre complaining a free service you paid NOTHING for stopped giving you their shit for free?

    Spotted the American!!

    Buy your own server you freeloading cunt.

  26. Re: now if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bruce is that you? ;)

  27. Re: you sound guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soooo guilty

  28. Re: No he's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. X10000000

  29. Retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Created an account a few hours ago. Select a few of the recommended people to follow. Go to log in a few hours later. Locked. I can unlock if I give them my phone number. Thanks, but Iâ(TM)ll pass.

  30. Re: No he's right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correction, they are wannabe pussy-grabbers. They are too beta to ever get that close to a pussy in the first place. Trump is just like them, except he inherited enough money so he pays to get close enough.