Slashdot Mirror


The GNOME Foundation Is Hiring (gnome.org)

"The GNOME Foundation is pleased to be able to offer paid employment to exceptional people who have the drive to help us complete our mission," reads a new announcement. Gnome.org explains: Today, July 6th 2018, the GNOME Foundation has announced a number of positions it is recruiting for to help drive the GNOME project and Free Software on the desktop.

As previously announced, this has been made possible thanks to a generous grant that the Foundation has received, enabling us to accelerate this expansion. "These positions are key to ensuring that the Foundation remains sustainable and that we are able to support the community in key areas," said Neil McGovern, Executive Director of the GNOME Foundation.

The Foundation is currently recruiting for four posts:
  • Development Coordinator. This will ensure that we receive sufficient funds to continue our work delivering free software.
  • Program Coordinator. The Program Coordinator will free up time from those involved in organizational, administrative and logistical problems.
  • Devops/Sysadmin. The systems and services we run need proper maintenance and care. As Flathub [An app store and build service for Linux] continues to grow, more support is needed to achieve this.
  • GTK+ core developer. GTK+ is core to our entire platform. Investing in development and maintenance of this toolkit will benefit the whole GNU/Linux ecosystem.

"The Foundation is keen to hear from any person who is interested in applying for one of these posts."


68 comments

  1. Re: RUSSIAN BACKED GNOMES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know the rate for a troll, but what's the going rate for a gnome these days?

  2. Wow, "paid employment". How gracious of them by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    And here I was thinking the bank would gift me my mortgage payments like how companies have been asking us to gift our time and skill.

    1. Re:Wow, "paid employment". How gracious of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't be a dick. you know very well that much of the development comes from people who willingly donate their time.

    2. Re:Wow, "paid employment". How gracious of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like how you willingly donate your time manning glory holes?

    3. Re: Wow, "paid employment". How gracious of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a dirty job, someone's gotta do it.

    4. Re: Wow, "paid employment". How gracious of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but that's not called employment

    5. Re:Wow, "paid employment". How gracious of them by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Back to the homosexual acts again, eh?

      Seriously, what percentage of your day do you think about cocks and balls? 90%? Or is that number waaaay too low?

    6. Re: Wow, "paid employment". How gracious of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem like a huge faggot. Get your dad's cock out of your mouth and stop replying to ACs.

  3. GNOME people think they're exceptional by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 1

    The GNOME Foundation is pleased to be able to offer paid employment to exceptional people who have the drive to help us complete our mission

    or to people who think that they're exceptional?

    1. Re:GNOME people think they're exceptional by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Exceptional is also an euphemism for mentally retarded. So...

    2. Re:GNOME people think they're exceptional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are indeed excepcional. One has to be exceptional to come up with such an assinnine desktop environment, which dictates how you should do things (or not at all) and that uses lots of system resources to boot. Only exceptional people can pull that off.

    3. Re:GNOME people think they're exceptional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be exceptional to fill the position of "Poettering Fluffer."

  4. Re:Oglaf comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Horus reference not withstanding, Oglaf is more esoteric than most realize...

  5. complete? by markdavis · · Score: 2

    >" to exceptional people who have the drive to help us complete our mission"

    Is the mission ever actually "complete"? Besides, sometimes it seems the mission is just to change things constantly in a way that irritates as many users as possible.

    1. Re:complete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the mission ever actually "complete"?

      yes you are right, no software ever ships, nobody ever gets up the courage to exit the front door. Every mission is "Mission Impossible"

    2. Re:complete? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      sometimes it seems the mission is just to change things constantly in a way that irritates as many users as possible.

      Have you considered that perhaps irritating as many users as possible is the mission? What better way to destroy something than to change it into something awful? #NoYouAreAConspiracyNut ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:complete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All right, Anon. Maybe you can tell us what Gnome's "mission complete" is? To get the entire Linux ecosystem tied to Red Hat developed technology? Cuz that's what is seems like.

    4. Re: complete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sense a systemd moan on its way.

    5. Re:complete? by mangastudent · · Score: 2

      Gnome is a special case, where we know in the foreseeable future that its GUI will consist of a single big button labeled NO .

    6. Re:complete? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Gnome is a special case, where we know in the foreseeable future that its GUI will consist of a single big button labeled NO ."

      LOL!

      Well, "no" + "me" = nome

    7. Re:complete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck it i'd be happy if they wrote some documentation.

    8. Re:complete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, clicking it will crash the system.

  6. Three Chiefs by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    One Indian. Seems like a good use of money.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re:Three Chiefs by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I just had a phone interview where it became quickly apparent their “development” group was like that. Person who called me had a mid-level title with “developer” in the name, but it was immediately clear he didn’t actually know squat about coding (and he said as much). Then he proceeded to ask me questions which should have been clear from either reading my resume or the responses I’d sent to his follow-up emails - seriously obvious stuff.

      When you’ve only got a half-dozen or so people in a development group, there’s really not a good reason that should include two tiers of non-coders.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Three Chiefs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Remember when somebody sunk $40 million into Gnome and ended up with one new theme?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:Three Chiefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes people fail obvious questions. Even about stuff they put on their resume.

    4. Re:Three Chiefs by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Sometimes people fail obvious questions. Even about stuff they put on their resume.

      This wasn’t a “let’s see if you really have the skills you claim” type of question - and, as I said, the guy wasn’t a developer so he couldn’t have determined that anyway.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Three Chiefs by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If they have enough programmer-volunteers, it might make sense

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:Three Chiefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The programmers should get all the money, and the "coordinators" should be fired and ridiculed. "Coordinating" is the do-nothing job that should be volunteer and without pay. If they are women, they should be sexually harassed first, to teach them a lesson about interfering with open-source. If they are men, they should be physically beaten for being worthless chaise-lounge homosexuals.

    7. Re:Three Chiefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slurpee Niigger

    8. Re:Three Chiefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Got an article for that? You're going to tell me to google that, and I'm going to respond that my fingers are tired and I don't want to be profiled. Then you'll say to use DuckDuckGo, and I'll respond you could have found the article by now. And you'll respond I could have found it by now, which I did, so here's what I found: https://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12157124&cid=56691496 which looks very similar to: https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12326068&cid=56907144

      To further my research I'll need to ask the first guy if he has a citation or article I could read. So, got an article for that?

    9. Re:Three Chiefs by Tough+Love · · Score: 1
      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  7. Do they have a closet full of broken keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there's a certain Slashdotter who has made his "Internet home" here who would gladly rummage around and troubleshoot keyboards for the developers.
    Just don't let him talk, he'll suck you in his world and you might not make it.

  8. Re:Oglaf comic by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    Uhm, you should have warned us before linking to a SFW Oglaf page. And the actual page is here rather than some Wikia stuff that fails to load.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  9. Re:Oglaf comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  10. Gnome is lame. Who cares. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/05/linus_slams_gnome_three/

    Nothing changed. Rumors he went to this to that etc. Everybody knows Gnome is as bleeding edge as windows 3.1. Stupid looking piece of shit let it die.

  11. Re: GNOME is hiring and feminists are burying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...filled with hatred and frustrations on a daily basis"

    Nothing a good dicking can't fix.

  12. Remove dbus, pulse and systemd, then we can talk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove dbus, pulse, and systemd, then we can talk about all the other bloat.

    I want .dotfiles. And fire all the Windows-want-a-bes that have been fucking up Linux GUIs the last 2 decades.

    If I wanted a GUI like Windows, I'd run Windows.
    If I want a GUI like OSX, I'd run OSX.

    Some Gnome things are nice. Most are bloated. I remember running X11 on a system with 8MB of RAM and it was nice. I have 500x more RAM and a 1000x faster CPU now, and Gnome is sluggish.

  13. Gratuitous sarcasm by Voice+of+satan · · Score: 0

    No skin color/number of sexual identities/missing limb requirement to be hired ? :D

    Well, people are free to (legally) do what they want with their money but there are plenty of DE's that could use some resources. Gnome 2 was nice though. I should give MATE a go.

    1. Re:Gratuitous sarcasm by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They should just get rid of all the morons they currently have & hire the MATE team.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. mystery donor happy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So gNome gets a million dollar donation a month or two ago from a mystery donor, and the foundation decides to increase their bureaucracy instead of spreading the much needed funds to various gnome projects? It's a shit foundation that enriches and expands it own administration rather than allocate the funds raised from donations where they could be of the most benefit to the project.

    BTW, do mystery donors have to agree and sign the Gnome code of conduct before their money is accepted? No? Didn't think so.

  15. Re:Oglaf comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is the bigger dumb ass? OP or the anon quoting from the idiotic Billy Madison?

    (Hint: it's you, anon)

  16. Re:Oglaf comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baaawww more.

  17. Re:Oglaf comic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least step up your game and quote from a smarter and actually talented source like Pauly Shore. I think his witticisms are more speed, buddy.

  18. Here's what really happened at GNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - they got a bunch of money
    - the lazy fruits running the project need a way to funnel it back to themselves
    - they quickly invent a bunch of positions, saying they "need" them
    - nobody who uses GNOME or has worked on GNOME thinks any of those positions is necessary
    - they will advertise the positions briefly, before giving them to completely unqualified friends
    - the GTK dev will introduce more dependencies

  19. Re: Remove dbus, pulse and systemd, then we can ta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better roll up your sleeves and get cracking, then, bucko. F/OSS isn't made to order.

  20. Re: RUSSIAN BACKED GNOMES by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    You seem to be very focused on homosexual acts.. Methinks thou doth protest too much....

    I'd be willing to bet you're the type of a person who beats up a homosexual, AFTER you have sex with him, in some vain attempt to prove you aren't gay.

  21. mission? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    To invent a system that ignored the users' needs?

    No one I know uses GNOME3. We've moved onto better things.

    1. Re: mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet you still felt compelled to comment on a GNOME story.

      Which suggests you keep an eye out for GNOME related content.

      Which suggests you haven't truly "moved on to better things".

    2. Re:mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've moved onto better things.

      I think you mean we've forked onto what was originally working and progressing.

      Mate desktop today is like a super-updated Gnome2, but with all the customizable bells and whistles left in tact.

  22. Quick let’s rewrite gtk and gnome again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Breaking everything.

    And requiring everything else to be rewritten. Again.

    It’s funny how we haven’t really moved that far beyond what gnome 1 could do.

    I guess it’s hard when we throw everything out every decade for new, shiny.

  23. Are the hiring Gardeners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always liked those pointy red hats!

  24. Will this make Gnome suck less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be a fan. It seemed like Gnome got better with every update.

    Then came Gnome 3. I hated it right away, it seemed far inferior to Gnome-2 in every way.

    None-the-less, I tried to like it. I thought I might like it if I got used to used to it.

    But is just sucked too badly.

    Now I use MATE, which is far superior, IMO. Never looked back.

  25. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No open positions in the "Inclusion & Diversity" department? Damn, & not even any openings in the "Code of Conduct" compliance & enforcement department!!! Double-damn!