Slashdot Mirror


EU Polls The Public About Abandoning Daylight Savings Time (europa.eu)

"Following a number of requests from citizens, from the European Parliament, and from certain EU Member States, the Commission has decided to investigate the functioning of the current EU summertime arrangements and to assess whether or not they should be changed."

The EU has launched an official "online consultation" seeking input from the public. Long-time Slashdot reader mitch0 writes: The consultation was started after some member states expressed the opinion that the daylight saving time should be abolished within the EU. There were some local motions in member countries as well, but these cannot really proceed without full coordination with all member states.

So far it seems that most of those wanting to end the daylight-saving change would stick to summer time all-year round, but the questionnaire has a specific question about this issue so a more representative result is expected after the survey is closed in the middle of August...

Citizens can express their opinion about the summer time change by filling out a short online survey.

37 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. DST by SenseiTim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Daylight Saving Time is a pain in the butt. There is no rational reason why we have to fool around with our clocks twice a year.

    1. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What electricity savings from DST? Studies conclude that if anything, DST costs more electricity to cool/heat a building than it saves in lighting.

    2. Re:DST by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      They should eliminate it simply based on the increase in heart attacks it causes.

    3. Re:DST by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a rational reason. It is to make people wake up with the sun, more or less.
      Here: http://gpinzone.blogspot.com/2...

    4. Re:DST by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What electricity savings from DST? Studies conclude that if anything, DST costs more electricity to cool/heat a building than it saves in lighting.

      Yep, and not only that, we see spikes in heart attacks/death every time we fsck with the clocks and having it mess with our internal clocks.

      I wish we could abolish it in the US too.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:DST by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't that the one benefit of DST changes? If it wasn't for the clock change, those heart attacks would have happened at random. No way to plan for those. At least with the clock change you can prep for the increased load of patients, right?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    6. Re:DST by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no rational reason why we have to fool around with our clocks twice a year.

      No rational reason? Mid-northern latitudes (~40-50 degrees) have about 16 hours sunlight in summer, and only 8 in winter. In summer, 1 hour is added to the clock, so that the sunrise is not at 5am (6 instead), and people benefit from late sunlight since this is a holiday season. In winter with no hour added sunrises happens at an earlier time, otherwise people would go to work in total darkness.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    7. Re: DST by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I click that link, the very first thing I see on the page is this:

      In 2008, Energy Department experts studied the impact of the extended Daylight Saving Time on energy consumption in the U.S. and found that the extra four weeks of Daylight Saving Time saved about 0.5 percent in total electricity per day.

      When I click on that link I go to this government page: https://www.energy.gov/article...

      On that page it says:

      While this might not sound like a lot, it adds up to electricity savings of 1.3 billion kilowatt-hours -- or the amount of electricity used by more than 100,000 households for an entire year.

      So... I'm not sure who's the liar here. Maybe you're just lying to yourself.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:DST by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I thought this was a joke but it's modded insightful.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:DST by sjames · · Score: 2

      Clock change happens on Sunday morning, the heart attacks happen on Monday morning, so the problem is work. Mandate no critical meetings in the morning and mandatory grace for being a few minutes late and we'll eliminate those and many more heart attacks.

    10. Re: DST by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So... I'm not sure who's the liar here. Maybe you're just lying to yourself.

      From the looks of it the effect varies with the local climate:

      But does daylight time still save energy? Not really, according to most research on the subject. Lighting has become a smaller part of overall energy consumption, and extending the use of daylight hours encourages people to use more air conditioning and heating. A 2017 analysis of 44 different papers on the subject found that, on average, the policy helped save 0.34 percent of electricity use. Places farther from the Equator (with mild summers and lower cooling demands) might save energy, but places closer to the Equator used more energy during daylight time, the researchers found.

      I did find another study (PDF) from Europe though that showed that really far north like Scandinavia it didn't actually help much at all. So it looks to be a Goldilocks zone, if you can extend the number of temperate days where there's no major need for warming/cooling then you can save a bit. And if we're moving towards EVs then it'll be an even smaller fraction of total power usage. But it's still zero point something percent.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roughly half of Europe lives north of the 50 degree line.

    12. Re:DST by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      otherwise people would go to work in total darkness

      so instead we go home in total darkness.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    13. Re:DST by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      That makes two of us.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    14. Re:DST by hnwombat · · Score: 2

      In fact, there are a number of rational reasons *not* to make a change. I am a research professor, and time is my field, including chronobiology. I see that someone has already mentioned the heart attacks thing. But there are a number of other effects. Similar to the heart attacks, there is a spike in automobile accidents during time changes. More generally, and probably of more impact, every single person experiences increased stress, and reduced time and quality of sleep due to the change. So it's not only those unlucky enough to be in an accident or have a heart attack that are harmed, it is every single person. (In fact, the increase in heart attacks is almost certainly in large part due to the increased stress, and the increase in accidents is probably due to the sleep disruption).

      So, yes, do away with the change. And businesses should not change their operating hours unless they have a direct link to sunrise/sunset. If you're working in an office, there is no need to ever change. If you're working at a park, there probably are good reasons to change. :-)

    15. Re:DST by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      In winter with no hour added sunrises happens at an earlier time, otherwise people would go to work in total darkness.

      Only people in suburban Detroit. The rest of us have working streetlights.

  2. Structural problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd imagine there's going to be quite a marked geographic divide on this. Southern Europe probably DGAF as they don't get the sort of seasonal variation in daylight hours you get in the north, and the very far north of Europe they have such extremes of variation in daylight hours that fudging the clocks by an hour makes no real difference. However there's going to be a band across the middle (UK, France, Germany, etc) where there exists the right balance between having a problem, and being able to somewhat remedy it by moving your clocks for a few months.

    The problem of course is that whatever is decided is going to be foist onto everyone regardless of need or want, because that's how the EU rolls

    1. Re:Structural problems by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Southern Europe probably DGAF as they don't get the sort of seasonal variation in daylight hours

      Plus they sleep all day anyway.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Structural problems by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Southern Europe probably DGAF as they don't get the sort of seasonal variation in daylight hours

      Plus they sleep all day anyway.

      . . . and the Southern Europeans respond with a chorus of:

      "Only mad dogs, and Englishmen, go out in the noonday sun."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Structural problems by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taking a nap at lunchtime would be good for the rest of us too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Structural problems by Teun · · Score: 2

      . . . and the Southern Europeans respond with a chorus of:

      "Only mad dogs, and Englishmen, go out in the noonday sun."

      Uhh, it is:
      Only mad dogs and other Englishman go out in the noonday sun.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  3. Re:Not DST by mitch0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The submission may have been a bit misleading, but it is not DST that is proposed to get abolished, but the DST change. So, each country is free to chose the timezone they'd like to remain in after the DST change is ended. There is a specific question for this in the poll as well (keep summer time, keep winter time or "don't care").

    I sure as hell hope the DST change will be ended, and we'll stick to summer time.

    --
    // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips,
    // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
  4. Re:since it is summer by mitch0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The sun is already up too early during summer, another half hour would make it a lot worse...
    We should just accept that winter sucks, the nights are long no matter how we play with the clocks...
    Just stick to summer time, that way at least the change to the sucky part of the year is gradual, and not a sudden one-hour shift a lot of people hate.

    Not to mention that the one hour shift this way and that still causes issues in most IT systems that need to be cleaned up each year after the change... (mostly when the same time "repeats").

    --
    // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips,
    // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
  5. Re:Not DST by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can move your ass an hour earlier out of the bed, no reason why the whole world has to do it!

    There's little point in me getting to school an hour before the prof, or to the supermarket before the staff.

    And I hear there are these things called jobs where it's sometimes necessary for several people to be there together.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. Re:Not DST by Misagon · · Score: 5, Informative

    How much light you have on a day depends on how close to a pole you live, and if it is summer or winter.
    Judging from your username I suppose you are in Southern USA. Well, southern Europe is about as far north as northern USA.

    For me in Stockholm in Northern Europe, the sun sets today at 10 pm and rises at 03:47 am CET. One hour forwards or backwards would not matter because it is TOO BRIGHT anyway.

    BTW, in the middle of winter, if the day is cloudy it may only get as bright as the summer nights are darkest. But then we don't have DST.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  7. It already crashed their servers, ..! by ReneR · · Score: 2

    When they started the questionnaire their servers where quickly hammered, and not reachable anymore. Probably says a thing or two, ...

  8. Openning hours by DrYak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This has already been tried several times over the years and always with the same result: People discover that they don't like it being dark longer in the morning during the winter.

    ...which you can also compensate by changing working hours.

    And several business have different opening hours during the seasons anyway (e.g.: due to reduced work force due to vacations in summer).
    So giving summer-specific opening hours that also happen to take into account the variation of sun time isn't that far fetched.

    (E.g.: public transport has different time tables at different time of the year, public services tend to have reduced opening hours due to lots of them going into vacations, hospitals emergencies work in shifts around the clock anyway, movie schedule change each week with new release, work-from-home and artists put their own work hours anyway, university research team tend to have the most WTF work hours specially for PhD students (except for that guy who has Eukaryotik cell cultures. He needs to feed them every 32 hours no matter how out of sync it gets with any rational work schedule), etc. Shops are about the only things which seem to open at a constant timetable.)

    It used to make sense to shift clocks back in the industrial era when most of the activities were dictated by fixed time schedules and nearly everybody needed to be in sync (factory working ours).
    Nowadays, in our mostly service-sector-based type of work, you need to check (e.g.: online on your smartphone) the opening hours and time schedule for probably around 7 out of 10 business. Supressing DST will simply make you check for the last remaining 3 too, instead of relying on fixed clock times.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  9. Re:since it is summer by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

    I've been saying this same thing for years.

    It all started when I was doing astronomy for a bit. Everything was in UT, and once I wrapped my head around that, everything time-related was so much easier.

    If you work 9 till 17, and I work 15 till 23, it's damn easy to figure out when to schedule a conference call. If you work 9 to 5 and I work 8 till 4 and we're 5 timezones apart and you're on DST and I'm not, it becomes a hell of a lot harder to to figure out when we can do business.

    But we can't even get the US to fully adopt the metric system, so I can't imagine people being OK getting up at 12 and heading to work at 14.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  10. Re:Let's do Metric Time Instead! by magarity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No more need for time zones, or the dreaded DST, at all! One time zone to rule them all!

    You're trying to be funny but actually in China this is exactly what they do. The whole country is on Beijing Time despite being what would normally be a 4 time zone wide country. And they don't bother with DST either.

  11. Re:since it is summer by arth1 · · Score: 2

    If you work 9 till 17, and I work 15 till 23, it's damn easy to figure out when to schedule a conference call.

    My former boss would have said 4, because that's the time that will inconvenience both the same amount...

  12. Saving, saving, saving ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    ... not saving s .

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  13. Old Native American saying by mschuyler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only the White Man would cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it on the bottom, and proclaim he had a longer blanket.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  14. Should abandon CET by starless · · Score: 4, Informative

    A lot of the western European countries (e.g. Spain, France) should abandon Central European Time (CET) of any type.
    It doesn't make any sense since since they're in western and not central Europe.
    That's one reason people eat so late in Spain, as they're to the west of England.

    Instead they should use WET (Western European Time), i.e. essentially follow the UK....

  15. Tyranny of the Majority by InfiniteZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am an extreme night owl by nature. It's something generic according to the latest research. I try my best to fit in with "normal" people's schedule, and get by OK for most part with a painstakingly maintained bedtime. But twice a year, the time switch throws me off for weeks at a time. It has been a struggle of a lifetime.

    If there is one textbook example of the tyranny of the majority, this is it. We need to get rid of it in the states too.

  16. Re:Old Native American saying by mschuyler · · Score: 2

    You are an excellent candidate for my sig.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  17. Re: Let's do Metric Time Instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, and that's why they're doing a public consultation rather than just telling everyone what's best! I know you Americans love to criticise the EU, but you really should educate yourself on how it works first.

  18. Stop this madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That article has several logical flaws. While there may be benefits to *being on* DST, there are also significant drawbacks to *switching* to and from DST, as mentioned above. The article never admits those, or compares their relative risks.

    Assuming it's true that changing clocks twice a year helps match "our modern clockwork-driven world adjust to our ancestral sleep and wake patterns", then wouldn't changing clocks 4 times a year be even better? Or every month? Why not every day? And instead of doing it per-state/country, why not adjust it exactly as optimal per latitude? We've got computers and satellites now.

    If you think that the cost of changing clocks is zero, then you should want to change them every day. If you admit that changing clocks has a nonzero cost, then you need to measure and compare the costs and benefits. The current implementation of DST is the worst of both worlds. It's like saying that 60mph is too fast for city driving, therefore everyone exiting the freeway should slam on the brakes as hard as possible. Maybe the premise is true, but this solution is terrible.

    > Well, it’s pretty simple: wake up with the sun like our ancestors did.

    Great idea, but that's not what DST is. If you're using a daylight alarm clock (or actual daylight), DST is irrelevant at best.

    > Congratulations; you just reinvented DST...poorly. Now instead of turning the clock back or forward, you have to add or subtract to the operating hours of every place you do business with twice a year.

    I already have to do plenty of mental arithmetic with clocks every year. The public clocks in every transit station in my city don't get set for DST for about a month after each DST change. Half the stores in my city have separate "winter hours" and "summer hours", because even DST isn't good enough for them. Is your goal to stop people from needing to add/subtract times? DST is worse at that, too.