Slashdot Mirror


118 All-Time Heat Records Set Around the Globe (miamiherald.com)

"It's so hot, even parts of the Arctic are on fire," reports Vox, citing wildfires in Sweden, while Greece "has declared a state of emergency as raging forest fires have killed at least 81 people and injured more than 190."

But heat-related disasters are happening around the world. In Japan 86 people have been killed by heatstroke, while another 23,000 people have been hospitalized -- about half of them over the age of 65 -- in a heat wave forecast to continue for another two weeks. "Japan hit 106 degrees on Monday, its hottest temperature ever," reports the Associated Press, adding that "So far this month, at least 118 of these all-time heat records have been set or tied across the globe." An anonymous reader quotes their report. "We now have very strong evidence that global warming has already put a thumb on the scales, upping the odds of extremes like severe heat and heavy rainfall," Stanford University climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh said. "We find that global warming has increased the odds of record-setting hot events over more than 80 percent of the planet, and has increased the odds of record-setting wet events at around half of the planet..."

"The world is becoming warmer and so heat waves like this are becoming more common," said Friederike Otto, deputy director of the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford.

"Death Valley, California, has set three consecutive daily record-high temperatures of 127 degrees," reports the Washington Post, adding that "Sometimes, like right now in the Western U.S., it's too hot for airplanes to fly" because of heat-related changes in air density at high-altitude airports. In Europe, nuclear power plants in Finland, Sweden, and German were forced to cut electricity production because high temperatures heated the seawater needed to cool reactors.

In northern California 38,000 people fled their homes as an 80,900-acre wildfire spread through the Shasta-Trinity area. Reuters reports the wildfire was caused "by hot, dry weather and high winds" -- and that it's one of 89 large wildfires currently burning in 14 U.S. states.

45 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are so fucking stupid it is infuriating.

    1. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by greenwow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the longer you measure, and we haven't been measuring that long, you statistically expect new highs. That's just how the math works. You need wide-spread and decades-long measurements to make a conclusion.

    2. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by snapsnap · · Score: 2

      So if, like here in Seattle, there's been two record breaking highs the past decade after over a hundred years of measurements that that doesn't mean it proves global warming? But shouldn't two record highs in a hundred years prove we're in run-away/hockey stick global warming?

    3. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Luckily, we have that data, and it shows that not only is this year setting records for high temperatures, so did the previous three years in a row. And the longer term data shows a clear trend.

    4. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Namarrgon · · Score: 5, Informative

      If the system was static, with constant average temperatures, then random events would produce an ever-decreasing number of new records each year, both high and low. The regular smashing of numerous high records (with the occasional low as well) is characteristic of a system with increased variability on top of a rising trend.

      But we already know that, not through statistics but because the science has been hammering it home since the 80s, with analysis of not only new measurements but 200 years of temperature records from all over the globe, and proxy records for the last few millennia.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    5. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Weather is not climate. There's plenty of proof of global warming, but this isn't part of it. "Global Warming" is a poor name, it's "Global Climate Change" and some places will actually get cooler, while others get hotter. Some places might stay the same temperature, just get more/less precipitation. The only thing known for sure is that it will suck for everyone, more if nothing is done, maybe less if we do something.

    6. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      If the average is constant, you will record fewer new extremes as time goes on. We are recording more extremes suggesting that we have a real problem here.

      In other words, you should expect regression to the mean, not divergence.

    7. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      To be fair, most of those predictions "use by" date are still in the future. You can't really complain that they haven't yet come to pass when they weren't expected to yet.

    8. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by aliquis · · Score: 2

      But we know CO2 and other things are green-houses gases and we know that more of those should heat the world up and we know we let a lot more of them into the atmosphere and we know temperatures has been rising.

      So as far as science go we've got the theory, we've got the variables and we've got the result and so far it's performing in line with the theory.

    9. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh you know, the total mass of insects has fallen by nearly 80% in 40 years. Doesn't that figure ring a bell about something exceptional happening? Bet most people didn't even know that.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    10. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that is not the real problem. The real problem is that extremists on both sides are total idiots.
      Far right screams that AGW is not happening,
      while the far left, wants to give passes for all nations except for the west, esp. America. For some odd reason, they believe that by stopping ~1/4 of the emissions, while allowing other nations, esp China, to add to their emissions by more than what the west was doing, is OK. Add to that, most of the far left, continue to fight Nuke power. Yet, the ONLY nations that have low CO2 emissions are those with large hydro, geo-thermal, or Nukes. What they do not have, is large Wind/Solar.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re: And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Long term data seems to show an increase, it is true, and logically we would expect some kind of increase after adding so much CO2 to the atmosphere, but this particular story is pure propaganda, and no attempt is made to calculate the likelihood of these temperatures being a result of AGW. No attempt is made to compare them with the thousands of cold temperature records made earlier this year. The purpose of this story is to hit people on an emotional level.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Informative

      Additionally, back in the 70's it was Global Cooling too

      Not in the peer reviewed journals. But in pop-sci media.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    13. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 2

      When you can drop your levels to the world average, maybe then other people will take you seriously. Until then you are just an entitled asshole who thinks polluting the most is your God given right just for being American.

    14. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other words, you should expect regression to the mean, not divergence.

      You're talking to someone who just suggested using statistics to show the world isn't warming, I suggest you don't use such big complicated words.

    15. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by riverat1 · · Score: 2

      But the longer you measure, and we haven't been measuring that long, you statistically expect new highs. That's just how the math works. You need wide-spread and decades-long measurements to make a conclusion.

      If there were no long term temperature trend you would expect to get as many new record lows as new record highs. Instead what we see is record highs outnumbering record lows by close to 2 to 1 since the year 2000.

      And even more dramatic is the number of record high daily lows. That is the overnight low temperatures are going up even more comparatively than the daily high temperatures. It's difficult to find data for that but in the first half of 2015 record high daily lows outnumbered record low daily lows by 6 to 1.

    16. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Giving developing nations more leeway is a centrist policy. Rather than demand everyone stops emitting CO2 a more realistic plan is to get developing nations on board with targets and low carbon tech.

      China is demonstrating that it's possible. Exceeding its ambitious targets, passed peak coal years ago...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re: And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      totally agree.
      In fact, I would like to see us drop the EV subsidies, and then have the feds increase gas/diesel tax by .01 / gal / month for the next 100 months. Yeah, bring it up by $1.00 / gal, but over 100 months. The gas portion needs to go to the state collected, while diesel goes to the feds. Then all of it must go to infrastructure.

      There is one issue that will popup. In particular, as we head towards EVs, we have the grid/utility capacity. The problem is that ALL of AE, nuke, and even nat gas are at near 100% capacity. Turns out that the slack in our system, is the coal. I thought it was around 90%, but turns out that coal is the ONLY electricity that has major slack. As such, we MUST build out new nukes and geo-thermal. Wind/solar can not replace on-demand well enough.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    18. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 2

      How about here from a few hours ago. Where you singled out China and Europe for not being at Indian levels. When you know America is 10 times higher but didn't mention it. Just conveniently slipped your mind did it?

      How many times have you said America is doing good because it's decreasing. Far too many to count. Yet you know for a fact they are among the highest of the high.

      Did you find a single lie yet WindBourne?

    19. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by YASlashdotAccount · · Score: 2

      No, the problem is bullshit arguments that someone's giving other countries a pass providing yet another excuse for inaction. China's a sovereign nation last I checked and Americans have little influence over there. Americans can do something about their own policies. I'm reminded of my kids arguing about cleaning their shared bedroom. Neither one wants to lift a finger for fear he might do slightly more than his brother. The end result is they both live in filth. This argument about what other countries are or are not doing shows the same level of maturity. By the way, China's emissions have peaked, and they are expected to get lowered. What's is going to take for America to feel like they've done enough so they can get with it? Does China need to bring their emissions below America's? You do realize they would have to cut it in half. That would conveniently give us another decade before we get off our ass.

    20. Re:And we still hear how global warming is a hoax by davesag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Climate change and global warming are not the same thing. Human industrial activity is causing a rapid buildup of greenhouse gasses. This is causing the planet to warm. That's global warming. The global rapid increase in mean temperature is causing climates to change as more and more energy is shoved into the system, historical temperature regulators like the gulf-stream slow, move, or just change, reflective snow melts, permafrost melts releasing more GHGs, suboceanic clathrates collapse due to increased water temperature (also releasing more GHGs), and so on. These changes lead to things like "arctic vortexes" and regional drops in temperatures as well as other weather extremes. But the overall global trend is increased temperatures.

      So to sum up:

      1. Humans are causing global warming.
      2. Global warming is causing climate change.

      Global warming and climate change are related but they are not the same.

      Increased levels GHGs are also causing the oceans to change PH, becoming more acidic. That's almost as serious an issue as climate change IMHO.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
  2. As we watch the world burn by JMJimmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We bicker about every stupid issue under the sun instead of taking the action we know is necessary.

    1. Re:As we watch the world burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We bicker about every stupid issue under the sun instead of taking the action we know is necessary.

      The Lone Ranger says to Tonto : "Tonto, we're surrounded by bloodthirsty Indians !"

      Tonto replies : "What do you mean "we", white man ?"

      The point is, some of us ARE taking action on a personal level. But we're not whining on Slashdot like you are, boy.

    2. Re:As we watch the world burn by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Massive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Put less CO2 and methane in the air. And as a side effect you don't hear the oceans and fuck with their pH balance.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:As we watch the world burn by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      What impact will not doing it have on our society? What happens when rain belts shift northward and major industrial powers suddenly have food security problems?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:As we watch the world burn by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I did. The cost in a hundred years will be much higher than today, in several categories; property loss, social costs, food security, geopolitical stability. And really, you're already paying the costs, as the insurance industry is already costing it in for several types of insurance. But it isn't going to get any better, and even if the targets were met, it would stall out the warming, but we'd still have to deal with the damage done. I get where you're coming from, if you can somehow wiggle out a "well it will cost lots of money, so fuck the future" that's better. And maybe you're right. Maybe we should just fuck the future. After all, nothing matters but the price of a commute.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:As we watch the world burn by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      oddly, the only nations that have reduced their CO2 to low numbers are those with hydro, geo-thermal, and/or nuke power. Those with wind/solar, esp. when they stopped their nuke powers, end up INCREASING their CO2. Germany and Japan are but 2 that actually increased their CO2, not lower it, since shutting down their nukes.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  3. Meanwhile, in America by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hopefully the American public will start to realize that the GOP and their current president are not representing ordinary citizens, but influential corporations, especially the ethically flexible ones, such as those highly invested in military and oil.

    This is why the GOP and their friends at FOX have been climate change deniers, and the current president is calling it a hoax. It's all about protecting profits right up until the point the entire world goes to shit.
    The US is the only country in the world where a large percentage of the population still does not believe in climate change even though 99% of scientists support it. This sick situation thanks to GOP politicians, lobbyists and the media that supports them, especially FOX News.
    Can you please tell them to fuck off before it is too late?

    1. Re:Meanwhile, in America by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Go look up 'Dominionism' and 'Dominionists', but don't yell at me when you get sick to your stomach. That's what, in part, is driving this bullshit.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, sure, it is only the fault of Republicans.

      The above is ( of course ) something only a simple-minded fool would either claim or believe.

      Plenty of Democrats have more than two children per family. Plenty of Democrats drive gas-hog vehicles. Plenty of Democrats live in houses which are much bigger than they need. Plenty of Democrats use air conditioning when a fan would suffice.

      The overly consumptive habits of western society would be a more realistic place to lay the blame. Of course if you were not a simple-minded idiotic knee-jerk leftist you'd already know that.

    3. Re:Meanwhile, in America by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that these Christian supremacist types and the libertarians were for a long time Conservatives' useful idiots. And then the useful idiots took over the party, and every dog whistle slogan Republicans had been using for a couple of generations to get that base to the polls suddenly is political reality. Now they're stuck between the reality they know is happening and a base that took what was a load of bullshit seriously.

      Not that governments that take the reality of AGW seriously are doing that much either, but even acknowledgment is something. But we'll do what we've done before, basically hand it off to our children and grandchildren, make them pay the economic and social price.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re: Meanwhile, in America by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      You might be able to call a week or two weather, but this is widespread across the northern hemisphere, and is part of a general trend of seasonal highs. And do you think the universe cares about Liberals and conservatives? CO2 has the properties it has, and doesn't change based on political affiliation.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  4. The direct result of overpopulation by Quakeulf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With exponential growth in third world country populations as well as rapid industrialisation of China etc. this is only the beginning. What needs to be done is to make a choice: More humans helped into this world through aid and relief efforts for irreversible damage to the environment, or a sustainable future for those that will be left of us.

    Please prove me wrong.

    1. Re:The direct result of overpopulation by DavenH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You aren't using 'direct' correctly. More people are not heating the planet up directly, and hence your call to action about population is unsubstantiated. If you double population but quadruple resource efficiency, you do less environmental damage.

    2. Re:The direct result of overpopulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In either case, halving the population (lets say by having fewer offspring for a few generations, to avoid the ugly alternatives) would also do less environmental damage... Quadrupling resource efficiency, that is most likely the harder option.

    3. Re:The direct result of overpopulation by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Innovation has to be funded. Trying to make coal profitable again is not innovation.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  5. Re:More PC Bullcrap by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    I have to ask. Are you functionally retarded?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  6. Re:Global warming will fix itself by DogDude · · Score: 2

    Vote for Hillary next time and it will all be better.

    Hillary isn't running again, shit heel. But yes, vote Democratic, and the people in office will work to improve things. Nobody ever claimed "suddenly global climate change will go away", you fuckwad.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  7. Re:Yeah, it's summertime by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There is this sort of thing:

    "Here are a few maps that illustrate this. Over 1,100 daily record low temperatures have been broken this week alone -- over 1,800 in the last 30 days, along with over 1,100 snow records. The last week of records broken, tied, or approached is shown in this animation from CoolWx.com"

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. Re:Yeah, it's summertime by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    You're wrong, cold in winter isn't "just weather," it's a sign the climate is warming.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  9. It's begun by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The methane is releasing in Siberia now.

    It's on, I believe the runaway effect is going on. It's still going to be slow for us as humans, since the world moves at a slower pace.

    Shit is hitting the fan, now. Little tiny flecks have already hit the blade, but huge lumps coming soon.

    Don't breed, we're going to see some serious shit in the next 20 years. Not 200, the next 20 will be shocking.

  10. Meanwhile, America met CO2 goals. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    America is on track to meet CO2 reduction goals.

    If you truly want to save the planet, protest to China, India, or even Russia...

    Now you might not live through the experience, unlike protesting in the U.S. But if you don't try you never cared about the planet anyway.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  11. and yet.... by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Germany, Japan, China, India, and a number of 3rd world nations keep adding new coal plants, instead of focusing on AE.
    Worse, so many will act like this is OK for all these nations.
    We have trump in America, but in spite of him/GOP, our coal consumption and CO2 continues downward (though not as much).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:and yet.... by Uecker · · Score: 3, Informative

      That Germany is adding coal plants is a myth.

      This is power generation from coal and lignite in Germany from 1990-2017 in TWh.
      coal 140,8 147,1 143,1 138,4 134,6 146,5 140,8 134,1 137,9 142,0 124,6 107,9 117,0 112,4 116,4 127,3 118,6 117,7 112,2 92,6
      lignite 170,9 142,6 148,3 154,8 158,0 158,2 158,0 154,1 151,1 155,1 150,6 145,6 145,9 150,1 160,7 160,9 155,8 154,5 149,5 147,5

      Source: https://www.ag-energiebilanzen...

  12. Re: and yet....typical western arrogance/entitleme by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 2

    Ok, here we have a far left that does not get it. India is likely at the level we all need to be at. China is already way over. Heck, most of Europe is still above where the globe needs to be.

    Why do you try so hard to avoid the elephant in the room?

    Graph of CO2 polluters
    India is at the level you think we need to be at... ok....seems a bit extreme to most people but lets go with it.
    China is 'way over'..... ok if you say so....seems to be about the average...
    Most of Europe is above, ok it's similar to China so no real reason to single China out other than your hatred of them.

    And America?
    Did you forget to mention that America is 2-4 times as bad as the countries you are complaining about?
    Twice the level of the 'way over' China even.
    Close to ten times Indian levels, that you claim is your target.
    Why are you not taking America to task?

    It's clear you are just anti-China and try to hide as much as possible, the fact your entitled country is a far worse CO2 polluter.