Slashdot Mirror


One Year After Data Breach, Equifax Goes Unpunished (boingboing.net)

"It's been a year since Equifax doxed the nation of America through carelessness, deception and greed, lying about it and stalling while the problem got worse and worse," writes Cory Doctorow. Equifax's new CSO says they've spent over $200 million on security upgrades, in work being overseen by auditor from eight different states. An anonymous reader quotes Doctorow's response: This all sounds very good and all, but it's still monumentally unfair. The penalty for Equifax's recklessness should have been the corporate death penalty: charter revoked, company shut down, assets sold to competitors... The fact that Equifax's investors and execs kept all the money they made by risking all America with shoddy security, and that no one went to jail for a monumental act of corporate recklessness, is a moral hazard, virtually guaranteeing that Equifax's competitors will not take the care they owe to the people on whom they have amassed nonconsensual, potentially life-destroying dossiers.
Equifax's CEO and several top officials did leave the company, notes Government Technology -- but that's about it. Thus far, no financial punishment has been imposed on Equifax itself. Despite contentious hearings, no Congressional action has been taken. A few months later, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau tabled action against the company. And while the Federal Trade Commission said it opened an investigation into the Equifax breach in September, the agency has since named as chief of its consumer protection division a lawyer who has represented Equifax. This past week, Equifax asked a federal judge to reject the claims from 46 banks and credit unions for payment of damages because of the massive data breach. The companies claimed that Equifax owes them for all the costs they incurred protecting data after the breach was revealed, costs that could easily run into many millions of dollars....

Equifax had revenue of $876.9 million during the second quarter of 2018, up 2 percent from the same quarter of last year, officials said.

88 comments

  1. GDPR and credit agencies by BellyJelly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a European, and with GDPR in force, can I demand that Equifax delete all the data they hold on me?

    1. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      As a European, and with GDPR in force, can I demand that Equifax delete all the data they hold on me?

      Can you ask? Yes.
      Will they do anything about it? Magic Eight Ball says "Don't count on it"

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    2. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by raburton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, but you'll never be able to get a mortgage, loan, new mobile phone contract, insurance, etc. again.

    3. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's the corrupt USA, not Europe. Moron!

      Captcha: reptiles

    4. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 5, Informative

      What one might do is freeze their credit with Equifax, and only Equifax. That would prevent them from profiting off of you. If a creditor wants to check you, they can use Experian or TransUnion. If the creditor demands Equifax, then you have a choice to make.

    5. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you'll never be able to get a mortgage, loan, new mobile phone contract, insurance, etc. again.

      I have never had any debt of any kind yet I have insurance, a mobile phone, a modest home, and several degrees from a leading american university.

      You don't have to play their games. You don't have to be the peasant working their fief.

    6. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It'll still depend somewhat on national implementation of GDPR quite how many rights you have in this area, as some countries tend to gold-plate the legislation.

      I work for a CRA, and we've put a substantial amount of effort into ensuring GDPR compliance, what scares me the most though is that the corporate attitude was to get us compliant at all costs, but that our client's compliance was their own problem. I disagreed with this, I believe we had an obligation to at least let them know what they needed to do to be compliant with our software. It irks me that we're compliant but we knowingly allow clients to use the data in a non-compliant way.

      So make no mistake, here in my country a large number of financial services organisations are currently NOT compliant.

      To be clear though, CRAs have always had exceptions under data protection law, much as with law enforcement. This is because they tend to support anti-crime activities such as fraud prevention and detection and use their data for those purposes. It's a tough one because you could argue private companies shouldn't do this and such anti-fraud measures should be publicly run, but let's be clear, this is one area where free market competition is a good thing - having companies play each other off at providing better and better fraud prevention and detection is far better than the stagnation you'd get from a publicly run version.

      Mostly you don't have a contract with a CRA though, typically you interact with them indirectly through your credit card provider, mortgage provider, and so on and so forth. Where you do have rights under GDPR is with these guys - you can demand they cease processing your data, you can demand to see what information they have on you, and so on and so forth. That only extends to the point of provisioning a service to you however, you cannot for example demand a credit card supplier delete all data on you if you still owe them for credit card debt. You can also request that financial services organisations don't send your data to a credit reference agency, and that they don't run a credit check on you, but they may simply refuse to accept you as a client in this case.

      The biggest benefit of GDPR IMO is in breach reporting - it's now a legal obligation to let you know if your data has been stolen, this means Equifax's handling of this breach would now be outright illegal under GDPR, because they not only didn't let people know, but kept it secret for a while. GDPR requires that you inform affected people as soon as you're aware of a breach - if you don't know which of your customers explicitly were affected you have to notify the minimal possible pool that could potentially have been affected, which might be your entire client base if you don't have sufficient auditing.

      So mostly you're not going to get much more ammo against CRA's with GDPR, but it does at least enforce much higher standards on us, which IMO is a good thing. I know we're widely hated as organisations, but some of us working in such agencies do at least have morals and do our best to keep these organisations as honest as we can - I have refused to allow my team to implement certain things because I've found them to be morally reprehensible on a number of occasions. Similarly I've written extensive documents detailing ethical, and sometimes legal problems surrounding existing software and passed it upto the directors to get the product killed, as when made aware of such issues they can't practically continue provisioning said software. You may question why I'm still even employed there given the problems I cause, but in a strange way even the directors accept when called out on bad stuff that I'm only keeping them honest in the way they publicly profess the organisation to be, I get a strange type of respect for helping keep the corner of the company I'm in charge of development for true to it's publicly professed ideals - a kind of love/hate relationship. Make no mistake, I don't buy the bullshit the companies spreads about how we're a public good, but I do at least do my bit to try and keep at least the CRA I work for firmly on the right side of the grey lines, I suspect if I didn't, we'd be just like Equifax showed itself to be.

    7. Re: GDPR and credit agencies by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      So it's a win win...?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    8. Re: GDPR and credit agencies by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      These summaries are getting very long and enciteful. Just stick to the facts and get to the point.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    9. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Maybe their copy. Good luck finding everyone else with a copy.

    10. Re: GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s the nation of America thanks

    11. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by pots · · Score: 1

      Is that true? Setting aside the fact that the grandparent is European, even if he were American there are two other credit agencies. I don't know exactly how it works, but it doesn't seem as though you would need to have information at all three.

    12. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. I mostly live off the grid and have, over the years, removed most of my info from these types of companies and am still able to get insurance and stuff.

    13. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have insurance, a mobile phone, a modest home

      All of which send regular reports to your nation's credit reporting agency that is used by the same companies you get the mortgage or services from. If you default on those payments for your mortgage, make late payments on your insurance or phone watch how hard it becomes to get new credit or what interest rate you get or what insurance rate you get.

    14. Re: GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean inciteful as in getting people up in arms or insightful as in getting real information from a Slashdot post, something as mythological as a reasonable liberal?

    15. Re: GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > enciteful

      Not an actual word, dumbass.

    16. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you'll never be able to get a mortgage, loan, new mobile phone contract, insurance, etc. again.

      I have never had any debt of any kind yet I have insurance, a mobile phone, a modest home, and several degrees from a leading american university.

      You don't have to play their games. You don't have to be the peasant working their fief.

      You established a credit history with a credit card at the start. Then went from there. If you erase all your credit completely you'll be hard pressed to get approved for a $500 credit balance let alone a new house.

      Talk to anyone in their 20's who never had a credit card about how hard it is to purchase things.

    17. Re: GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work anywhere and they run a credit check on you. Apply for a clearance? Ditto. Do you rent? A credit history is required. The ratchet job on all major purchases is forcing people into some forms of credits obligation or verification at the very least. Escape is not an option for most, so a revolution is coming.

    18. Re:GDPR and credit agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely. They don't even know which country I live in.

  2. Frosty Piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump 2020

  3. Penalties by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

    The penalty for Equifax's recklessness should have been the corporate death penalty: charter revoked, company shut down, assets sold to competitors

    If this is truly a case of recklessness, lying and stalling, then it sounds like their reaction to the breach was a matter of policy or strategy set by upper management. So how come none of these guys are rotting in gaol?

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Penalties by msauve · · Score: 2

      "So how come none of these guys are rotting in gaol?"

      They're rotting in Gaul. Somewhere near St. Tropez.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Penalties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their subscriptions at the Lodge are paid up, immune to harm. Unlike VW who got the chop.

    3. Re:Penalties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under the current administration? Please. Donnie's gonna give them the Congressional Medal of Freedom because of how badly they were treated by the fake news media. Shameful.

  4. Shareholders by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I laugh when the shareholders say, "but what about me?". Possibly the biggest motivation to keep companies honest is to hurt the shareholders. We should be expecting people to consider the moral standing of companies they invest in and let them hurt when they have supported a company that will do something like this.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Shareholders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your solution is to somehow make everybody invest based on the moral values of a company, rather than profit potential?

      How in God's name do you propose to do that?

    2. Re:Shareholders by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Simple, penalties need to be high enough to affect stock performance. Let everything else take care of itself.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Shareholders by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      Somehow I "knew" that they wouldn't get punished in today's environment, so when the stock plummeted I gambled and bought 100 shares, and now I'm ahead a couple of grand. Not a fortune (my risk-taking tolerance has limits), but it shows my gut feel was right.

    4. Re:Shareholders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, possibly the biggest motivation to keep countries honest is to hurt the citizens. If any official or soldier commits a crime, all citizens are put on trial along with them- "how could you let him do this?! why weren't you watching and/or stopping him, he is your employee?!"

      Seriously - citizens and shareholders alike mainly provide(d) money and get something in return. The actual individual decision-making is in the legislative / executive, which has its own duties.

    5. Re:Shareholders by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's totally different. People don't have free choice to live in whichever country they want, they do have free choice to invest in the business they want. Apples to oranges.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  5. vs Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fuckers in congress cared more about the Facebook fiasco - and that was their business model. People signed up for FB. No one signed up for Equifax. They collected and lost our data, but no one gave a flying fuck.

    1. Re:vs Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that would involve actually DOING SOMETHING rather than putting on a show.

  6. Not News by Sydin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Corporations haven't been accountable for anything in this country for years, because those in power (yes, Democrats AND Republicans) are in their pockets. If you want to see what happens when Government actually tries to strike back at corporations with these assholes in power, look no further than the CFPB, which has had its power castrated and is currently in the process of being de facto dismantled because it ruffled too many powerful feathers by actually punishing a company (Wells Fargo) for breaking the law.

    What would have been news is if Equifax or its top brass received any actual meaningful punishment.

    1. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Enron and Worldcom executives have been tried, convicted and jailed. Both companies are essentially gone due to government prosecution and their own corporate malfeasance. So your assertion that corporations have not been held accountable is blatantly false. There are many more examples than these two.

      Why did you come here to lie, and why would others promote your false post to Information with a score of 5?

    2. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly this. You'd think it is the one area where genuine liberals and conservatives can get along because whenever I listen to reasonable people on either side talking in the absence of the other they all say similar things. Both are very concerned about corporate power and corporate accountability.

      The problem is that the controlling interests in both major parties are not and have not been in line with the people on this one for a very long time. Bill Clinton completed the corporate takeover of the Democratic party when he was in office, quite deliberately, and the Republican party has been owned by large corporate interests for longer than that. You can see the disagreement between the people and the parties in the way the Democrats deliberately and a lot would say illegally sabotaged the Bernie Sanders campaign, and in the way people on the other side elected Donald Trump. (Quick aside to those who don't pay attention: Trump is no anti-corporate crusader, but at least he's not afraid to call out wrongdoers and he is genuinely and vehemently disliked by the Republican party leadership--as are most of his supporters, and the feeling is very mutual.) One thing I said about the primaries was that Bernie and Donald both had very different solutions to our economic issues, but they both correctly and surprisingly identified the causes of the problems. Simply identifying the problem and calling out corporate corruption was an act of blasphemy completely beyond anybody else on either side in that race.

      Conservatives in particular ought not to be corporate apologists. Large corporations are not the embodiment of capitalism, they are its antithesis. They seek to minimize and end competition and to control and manipulate markets, not to compete in them. Conservatives believe in adhering to the founding principles of this country but a lot of those principles are never really taught properly. The founders knew how to deal with corporations: in their day, corporations could only be founded for limited periods of time, and for a single purpose (no conglomerates). At the end of that time the corporation was dissolved and the proceeds distributed to the shareholders. If a corporation was found not to be acting in the public interest, the corporate death penalty was very real. THAT is how the founders governed corporations and monied interests, it's why the US didn't produce its first millionaire-equivalent for several decades after the founding of this nation, and frankly it's one reason the founders are quite misunderstood today: they owned houses and land that today you'd have to be extremely rich to afford and yet back then were residences and enterprises of people who were for the most part upper middle class in their society.

      The founders were also protectionists and the notion of free unfettered corporate driven trade would have been absurd to them: the British forbade the manufacture of lots of finished goods and things like fine clothing in the colonies. When George Washington was elected President the first thing he did was send his measurements to a tailor in New York, said tailor being one of the only makers of fine clothing we had at the time. He was NOT going to be sworn in wearing British-made formalwear. Two of the very first actions of the very first Congress would draw screams and temper tantrums from today's Republican leaders: they voted funds to help the poor in the nation's capital, and they put in place a framework of tariffs designed to protect American industry and encourage manufacturing of key necessary things in this country. That framework funded most of the federal government until World War I, and the tariff structure largely stayed in place until Jimmy Carter started and Ronald Reagan finished destroying it--a time period that of course coincided with serious advances in corporate power and serious declines in manufacturing and our standard of living. Isn't bi-partisan cooperation wonderful?

      When the Hoover Dam was constructed, 7 different companies

    3. Re:Not News by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Corporations haven't been accountable for anything in this country for years, because those in power (yes, Democrats AND Republicans) are in their pockets. If you want to see what happens when Government actually tries to strike back at corporations with these assholes in power, look no further than the CFPB, which has had its power castrated and is currently in the process of being de facto dismantled because it ruffled too many powerful feathers by actually punishing a company (Wells Fargo) for breaking the law.

      What would have been news is if Equifax or its top brass received any actual meaningful punishment.

      Try to remember that it was Democrats that created the CFPB in the first place and Republicans that are dismantling it. Every time the Republicans get the White House they gut the regulatory agencies, from the EPA to the SEC. There are corrupt Democrats but establishment Republicans are the worst.

    4. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds exactly like a Catholic complaining about Protestants. Lay off the religious tribalism. Political leaders are leading you through a fantasy land. It's not real, but the corrupt will stay in power so long you believe their fantasy is your reality.

    5. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're delusional if you think the Democrats aren't equally complicit in propping up this crony capitalist system. Or are you going to pretend that financial companies weren't subsidized at taxpayer expense under Obama during the great recession? There's simply no difference. Neither party is going to effect change in this area.

      But Americans love their football teams and political parties, I guess.

    6. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh BULLSHIT! Democrats and Republicans are BOTH crooked as all hell! If both parties were completely castrated and dumped down a deep dark hole the world would be a better place! Both parties take money from the same companies, the same people - they hedge their bets by BUYING off politicians from BOTH parties! Your a blind ass liberal who thinks everything bad is because of republicans and can't admit that democrats are just as bad! gauge our your eyes and get new ones!

    7. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2015, OPM's dataset of security clearance data regarding nearly the entire Federal Government was stolen. This was a treasure trove for foreign intelligence, and for "regular" identity theft. There were no consequences for anyone in the government.

      The lack of consequences is not the result of corporations or government, it's the result of the lack of criminal law regarding these issues. If negligence leading to data theft carried criminal consequences, the world would be very different...

    8. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, that was, like, in the last century. All kidding aside,
      that was a long time ago and some Congressmen got burnt
      by the likes of Enron so that's what happened there.

      Congressmen don't care 'bout Equifax 'cause they have
      tax payer supported credit for life.

    9. Re: Not News by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      The CFPB is the only thing standing between the bank and your money. I work in the industry and no one wants these guys on their ass. I can see where they wouldn't have as much power against the large banks though.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    10. Re:Not News by Phasedshift · · Score: 1

      CFPB is a joke from my personal experiences and it seems like a waste of money from my perspective. Name some positive things they have done that weren't already going to happen due to existing class action lawsuits at the time.

    11. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enron and Worldcom executives have been tried, convicted and jailed. Both companies are essentially gone due to government prosecution and their own corporate malfeasance. So your assertion that corporations have not been held accountable is blatantly false. There are many more examples than these two.

      Why did you come here to lie, and why would others promote your false post to Information with a score of 5?

      They lied and falsified documents. Being oblivious to a security hole isn't criminal.

    12. Re:Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are crooked politicians on both sides. However, the Republican party's unified goal is crooked - they want to get rid of all regulations, even the ones that have been proven time and again that are needed to prevent abuse. They refuse to learn from repeatedly bad results, as can be expected of a party that rejects all of science and history to appease their base. We're only a decade from a financial crash that proved how much damage an unregulated banking industry will do to our economy, and they want to undo everything put in place to prevent it. These regulations are being attacked by one party, not both. You can't claim equivalence on this subject without something to back it up, and the vast majority of Democratic politicians are against rolling back the regulations that they put in place. And you've offered no proof that this Republican plan to deregulate the banks is supported by the Democrats, just a unfocused rant against liberals.

      The Democrats aren't great, but they are far better than the party that rejects reality while blindly adhering to principles which should have been long since discarded.

  7. There is pending class action law suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I read there was at least a couple dozen class action law suits pending against Equifax. These sort of things take time to process through the system and its obviously not over or the end to litigation penalties for Equifax.

    1. Re:There is pending class action law suits by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      Last I read there was at least a couple dozen class action law suits pending against Equifax. These sort of things take time to process through the system and its obviously not over or the end to litigation penalties for Equifax.

      ...and for our next trick, we restrict the filing of those pesky class action suits!

  8. sarcasm But we have the best gov't money can buy! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    /sarcasm I mean, its not like corporations bribe, er, lobby congress, right?

    --
    The Best thing about America: Capitalism
    The Worst thing about America:Capitalism

  9. Equifax is not a person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One Year After Data Breach, Equifax Goes Unpunished

    Stop referring to companies as if they were people. That is a false flag that the U.S. Supreme Court has waved for decades (by the way, Hobby Lobby is a person with a religion too).

    Hold the executives individually responsible for the debacle. Throw their asses in prison for decades (which can not be done to a corporation). The rest of the psychopaths running corporations will get the message and avoid making similar mistakes.

  10. why do you do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ffs, don't listen to Boing Boing. That guy is a hack. He isn't honest, and he's just trying to piss you off.

    1. Re: why do you do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Citation Needed]

  11. Bill them for my time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The time it took to execute a freeze on their website?

  12. You mean centuries, since ancient Rome by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > the U.S. Supreme Court has waved for decades

    I think you mean centuries. The first business corporations were for road building and other government contracts in ancient Rome. An individual mason couldn't build a road, a baker couldn't feed the army. Together, a thousand craftsmen could bid to do these things. If the project was late, or there were quality problems, the corporation so established would be penalized for the poor performance, rather than trying to figure out which of the many workers caused the delay. If it was finished ahead of schedule, the contract could include a bonus the bakers' corporation. If a road needed certain materials, the road building corporation could make a deal to buy 100 tons of pitch - you didn't need a single ultra-wealthy individual to personally buy enough material to build a road. The corporation meant ordinary workers, together, could do so. If there was a dispute with the pitch merchant, the merchant could bring an action against the corporation before the magistrate, rather than individually suing each of the 1,000 road workers.

    > Throw their asses in prison for decades

    Okay, which executives? How many decades should the head of accounting, the CFO, serve for the carelessness of some people in IT? The vice president of marketing? How about the head of HR? Penalizing the corporation, and thus the people who made money from it solves this issue.

    1. Re:You mean centuries, since ancient Rome by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Which, how long? Investigate. Was this done through carelessness or (as their subsequent actions seem to indicate) did they attempt to cover up their snafu? They discovered the breach but sat on it. Who signed off on that? And if you can't find those directly responsible, then jail or at least fine (out of their own personal fortunes) the nominally responsible persons in the boardroom. That's what "accountable" means.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:You mean centuries, since ancient Rome by sjames · · Score: 1

      If the project was late, or there were quality problems, the corporation so established would be penalized for the poor performance,

      That's the part that's missing in the U.S. today.

      That and dissolution of corporate charter if the corporation fails to operate in the public interest.

    3. Re: You mean centuries, since ancient Rome by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The penalties to a single citizen outstrip any penalty levied on a corporation. If a single person created a superfund disaster their life would be ruined. Corporate defense contractor...few million in fines...they shrug it off. The penalties should be so stiff that the CEO almost pisses himself when he learns of the impending litigation.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  13. Re:sarcasm But we have the best gov't money can bu by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

    --
    The Best thing about America: Capitalism
    The Worst thing about America: Capitalism

    --
    The Best thing about America: Capitalism
    The Worst thing about America: Capitalists

    FTFY

  14. Tree Huggers Are Dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the TrumpVerse! Your days are long gone, socialist swine dogs.

  15. Who did it? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    We, the public affected by this breach, still have very little information on just what happened or by whom. We have a bit of "how" info, in articles like this, and this shows another penetration in Argentina. "online portal designed to let Equifax employees in Argentina manage credit report disputes from consumers in that country was wide open, protected by perhaps the most easy-to-guess password combination ever: “admin/admin.”"

    With megacorps spanning the world, no one countries data laws are doing shit to stop any of this. Megacorps will just move portals to the easiest country to operate in, and then obfuscate, confuse, and stall any inquiries while they furiously delete off-shore evidence because it's not strictly "illegal" for some separate, non-US company to do so. "the credit bureau took the whole thing offline shortly after being contacted by KrebsOnSecurity this afternoon". My bet is it's more than offline; or offline as in deleted and all servers and backups burned with thermite and dumped into the ocean.

    The US government doesn't even consider any of this "Critical infrastructure". This isn't in the same league as these reports, so it's all left up to the "free hand of the market". This attack is affiliated with China and not Russia: "One tool used by the hackers, China Chopper, has a Chinese-language interface but is also in use outside China"

    There has been lingering suspicions of internal bad actors in this. "The company hired Susan Mauldin, a former security chief at First Data, to run the global security team. Mauldin introduced herself to colleagues as a card-carrying member of the National Rifle Association, according to a person familiar with the changes." With the current probes pointing towards massive Russian money laundering into the GOP via the NRA, this is very bad. Also, "Overseeing technology for Equifax was David Webb, a Kellogg MBA and Russian-language major hired in 2010 from Silicon Valley Bank, where he had been chief operations officer. "

    Most frighteningly, this stolen info has STILL never shown up on the dark web. Looking at the Moloch data, there were two separate teams who spent quite some time on this. Obviously it is an APT, like Shell Crew, or such. This means government sponsored, someone had to pay for all of this and the info wasn't sold off for a profit. This is what happens when "unregulated industry" meets 21st century cyber economic warfare.

    1. Re: Who did it? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      "My bet is it's more than offline; or offline as in deleted and all servers and backups burned with thermite and dumped into the ocean."

      The people doing the burning get heavily rewarded. I have been the guy who knew too much.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  16. Wells Fargo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding Wells Fargo...
    Why haven't 100% of their customers transferred to some other bank or credit union? Vote with $$$, don't reward bad behaviour.

    A reminder:
    In Soviet America, [wells-fargo] stage coach robs you!!

  17. cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the big defense contractors (Lockheed, General Dynamics etc.) lost all the U.S. military secrets but noone was punished. Instead they howl about Snowden and Assange. They probably lost the secrets on purpose (war is more profitable than peace to them).

  18. Have no fear by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    fellow /.ers. The free market will punish them any minute now. Yep. Any. Minute. Now.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Have no fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would, if people actually bothered to boycott properly. I locked my Equifax account and will never unlock it, so I'm doing my part. If everyone did that Equifax would go out of business. Similarly, I refuse to buy Sony because they infected their customers with malware.

      But these companies still exist because too many people keep on giving them money (or obtain credit from creditors that require an Equifax credit check in that case). There is still demand for products from slimeball companies, so companies realize there isn't any market pressure to behave themselves.

  19. Good question. The answer is by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You bring up some good questions. With a little investigation, you can discover that the CEO did not order the network security tech "be careless about how you configure the zones on the ASA". The CEO doesn't know what an ASA is, and the tech has never met the CEO. So it gets rather complicated.

    When there is a specific law related to an overt act, such as dumping toxic waste somewhere, you may be able to follow the chain of command and figure out who knew what and who authorized what. The problem at Equifax was mostly not be careful on general. There was no one item that they did or failed to do which caused the breach. Their security just generally sucked all around, they were sloppy. Notice "they" is plural. Even if they had updated the application that was actually used in the breach, the bad guys would have just used one of their other security holes. Anyway, no boss sent out a memo saying "be sure to be sloppy about updating software".

    So I don't think you can pin this on one person, or a few people. What you CAN do is identify who profited from their decision to be sloppy, to not invest in security. That would the shareholders. They can be penalized by taking the money that they inappropriately got by failing to pay for proper security, and perhaps more. The way you get money back from the shareholders is by fining the company.

    1. Re:Good question. The answer is by fafalone · · Score: 2

      Did the IT director ever put in a request for additional personnel, funding, or authorizations to address their poor security? No, it's on him. Yes, it's on who denied it (ultimately, if it was passed up the chain) or didn't respond. Or if it was granted and not acted on, back to the IT director. Last option, the IT director was underqualified and couldn't have been expected to know they didn't have proper security, then it's on the person responsible for staffing that position.
      Determining who had what responsibility is the whole point of investigations. Most of the time it winds up being crystal clear.

  20. So??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enron and Worldcom executives have been tried, convicted and jailed. Both companies are essentially gone due to government prosecution and their own corporate malfeasance. So your assertion that corporations have not been held accountable is blatantly false. There are many more examples than these two.

    Why did you come here to lie, and why would others promote your false post to Information with a score of 5?

    What about the customers and shareholders who have been screwed? Yeah, sure, the bosses went to jail (so what?!) the little people were screwed and have to suck it up.

    Corps need to pay out damages - even if it means liquidation to make things right.

    THEN and only THEN will corporate America take corporate malfeasance seriously. Otherwise, it's just a nuisance cost of doing business.

    1. Re:So??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up Arthur Anderson, the accounting firm.

  21. civil lawsuits and not just for Equifax by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Far too many companies and their executives, get passes on all the BS.
    For example, did any executives do time for the deaths on the deepwater horizon? Nope.
    3 companies paid out $54B, and several engineers were punished for hiding data because they were told from above to hide the data. No jail time for the murders of 11 ppl.
    Now, we have companies like Equifax and many other large companies that are irresponsible in dealing with our data, and very little happens to them.
    What is needed is a massive lawsuit against these companies AND the individuals that make the bad choices.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  22. That's the corporate structure by DogDude · · Score: 2

    That's a huge problem in the US: The corporation.

    If a small business owner does something horrible that hurts, kills, or otherwise damages people, customers or not, that business owner will end up in jail.

    Once that business gets a bit bigger, and becomes a corporation, the owners are now called "shareholders". In the US, "shareholders" of a corporation are not legally liable for anything the corporation does. That's the crux of the problem

    Ideally, all of the owners of a company should be just as liable as the single owner of a company. In the US, money is King, so that's never going to happen. Corporations can do whatever they want, with no legal repercussions, but individuals can't.

    It's really fucked up, and it's the cause of so many problems in our society. That's why our government is for sale. That's why bribery is 100% legal at the highest levels of government. Make the individual owners of every company liable, and watch how fast companies of all kinds clean up their acts. I doubt that Equifax would have done what they did, if every one of their millions of owners was looking down the barrel of some serious jail time. Or, Equifax wouldn't have millions of owners in the first place.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  23. Sure. Because The Rich weren't affected. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    Only us plebian nobody Poor could possibly be affected, so why should The Rich give a flying fuck about us? We can all go bankrupt and get our identities stolen so far as those cocksucking bastards are concerned, they don't have to care because all their shit was protected to the Nth degree. So rather than spank their other Rich buddies that run Equifax they just ignore the whole thing. Fuck them, sideways with a rusty chainsaw. It almost makes me wish Russian and Chinese hackers would crash the whole thing and destroy it, then while chaos ensues we can find these Equifax bastards and cut their gods-be-damned heads off.

    1. Re: Sure. Because The Rich weren't affected. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what happens in a society that has uneven application of law....only a matter of time before hordes of people figure out they need to march to Connecticut.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re: Sure. Because The Rich weren't affected. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You have bread and circuses. Nobody will do anything. Guns? For entertainment: cans shooting or for girls pictures book.

  24. Raymond Williams, Daryl Duncan, Penny Duncan, US T by raymorris · · Score: 1

    You mean like Raymond Williams, Daryl Duncan, Penny Duncan, from U.S. Technology Corporation? And William Terry Wright, president of Explo? Those were last month. In May we had guys like Gavin Rexer, Dennis Paulhamus Timothy Sweitzer, Joseph Powell, and John Joseph from Rockwater Northeast. This month it's Trey Glenn headed to prison.

  25. Just what we need, more sue happy Americans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what we need, more sue happy Americans.

    1. Re:Just what we need, more sue happy Americans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's suing for a stupid reason and there's suing for a good reason.

      Where would you categorize the notion of suing Equifax over this data breach?

  26. This is how f'ed up the USA is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporate criminals get rich and face no penalty. The average citizen gets screwed over. The US political system (both parties, remember Obama let off the Wall Street crooks during the 2008 Great Recession) is f'ed.

    1. Re:This is how f'ed up the USA is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, Bush was still President during 2008. Obama came into office in early 2009. But he still did not hold Wall Street accountable.

  27. How would MORE sloppy people help? by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > Did the IT director ever put in a request for additional personnel, funding, or authorizations to address their poor security?

    Equifax, throughout the company, had a culture of sloppy. It was sloppy before that IT director arrived. More people doesn't fix sloppy.

    The CEO *tried* to blame one of the techs. That didn't go over so well.

    1. Re: How would MORE sloppy people help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't find a deliberately malevolent or clearly negligent person to blame, put it in the CEO for not managing the companies risks and liabilities properly.

      I'm ok with the death penalty for someone who loses/steals/created pollution of ten million or more or kills people. If the CEO looks the other way when told "our heavy metal disposal teams haven't been submitting receipts the past year and ignores it, fuck that guy if it turns out theyve been dumping it in the river or a fly by night subpar "facility".

  28. Hahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when a big corporation with $$$ is punished? What world do you guys live???
    Do you want change??? Vote right next time and dont reelect those that are alteady there and not doing anything.

  29. US vs EU corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VW: US$2.8 billion criminal fine and US$1.5 billion in civil penalties + $15.3 billion for public and private civil actions+ criminal charges + ...
    Equifax: nothing

  30. And we do exactly that . . . by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    . . . in a free market. Check out BP's and Enron's historic stock prices for proof of this, trued up chronologically with the Horizon spill and the Lay / Skilling shred-fest, respectively. Of course, we bailed out the auto and financial industries and sent future generations the bill, but that's free market intervention.

  31. And it brings to light by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    That all the credit rating agencies have bunk data. It's why I froze all my info.

  32. Let's dox them, shall we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Americans at large would feel redeemed if we could have a list of home addresses these top executives and investors, so we could pay them a "visit" and "discuss" our "opinions" with them.