Slashdot Mirror


DARPA Has an Ambitious $1.5 Billion Plan To Reinvent Electronics (technologyreview.com)

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which funds a range of blue-sky research efforts relevant to the US military, last year launched a $1.5 billion, five-year program known as the Electronics Resurgence Initiative (ERI) to support work on advances in chip technology. It has now unveiled the first set of research teams selected to explore unproven but potentially powerful approaches that could revolutionize US chip development and manufacturing. From a report: The ERI's budget represents around a fourfold increase in DARPA's typical annual spending on hardware. Initial projects reflect the initiative's three broad areas of focus: chip design, architecture, and materials and integration. One project aims to radically reduce the time it takes to create a new chip design, from years or months to just a day, by automating the process with machine learning and other tools so that even relatively inexperienced users can create high-quality designs.

"No one yet knows how to get a new chip design completed in 24 hours safely without human intervention," says Andrew Kahng of the University of California, San Diego, who's leading one of the teams involved. "This is a fundamentally new approach we're developing." William Chappell, the head of the DARPA office that manages the ERI program, said, "We're trying to engineer the craft brewing revolution in electronics." The agency hopes that the automated design tools will inspire smaller companies without the resources of giant chip makers, just as specialized brewers in the US have innovated alongside the beer industry's giants.

4 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. The 'Matter Compiler' approach by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm beginning to think that we're reaching the limits of what we can do with the laser lithography method of silicon IC creation. For instance look at the problems Intel is having with 10nm fabrication right now. Perhaps the way forward is straight out of science fiction: a matter compiler/3D printer-like approach, where an integrated circuit is built up an atom or a molecule at a time? Pure imagination on my part, but is it really out of our reach?

    1. Re:The 'Matter Compiler' approach by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't seem that far out of reach theoretically. However, as in all things, the practical cost effective reach seems a long way off.

      A lot of things *could* be done, but we don't do them because they are too expensive or better/cheaper/faster options exist so we use the other options.

      Isn't that precisely what DARPA is for, though? Fund research that is cutting edge, highly speculative, or too long term for private companies to undertake? A lot of the technology and techniques that DARPA develops eventually makes it's way to the civilian market as well.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  2. Re:FPGA by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    FPGAs have advanced a lot in 20 years, but they are the moral equivalent of running your code under Java. That's not at all what they do, but their ability to configure on the fly comes at a very high cost in terms of frequency, power and area. A custom chip is always going to be faster, smaller and cheaper (COGS wise).

    It's true that FPGA mfg's could do more to enable other tools, but their motivation is very weak.

  3. So terrific for the economy by rbrander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Basic research! Nothing more likely to "fail" in the commercial sense, and so hated by free market companies that hate risk (all of them); nothing more likely - longer term - to come up with the big finds that create whole new economic sectors.

    Their "ARPAnet" idea wasn't even supposed to make money, that's the funny bit.

    With just a little luck, some of this research will end up creating whole new economic opportunities, which will result in a few people becoming billionaires, who will probably, with tiresome regularity, turn out to be libertarians who don't believe government can do anything useful and attempt to pay no taxes.

    Ah, those public bureaucrat-scientists struggling for grants: America's true Job Creators.

    (Juuuust kidding, of course. America's real job creators are consumers: without people putting butts in seats of the restaurant, neither the cooks&waiters, nor the restaurant owner, nor his banker, have any jobs.)