Slashdot Mirror


20 States Take Aim At 3D Gun Company, Sue To Get Files Off the Internet (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Twenty states announced Monday that they plan to ask a federal judge in Seattle to immediately issue a temporary restraining order against Defense Distributed, a Texas-based group that has already begun making 3D-printer gun files available on its DEFCAD website after a recent legal settlement with the US State Department. "After almost 18 months I was skeptical that there was anything else that this administration would do that would truly shock me, but they have," Washington Attorney General Bill Ferguson told reporters assembled in Olympia and by phone. "Frankly, it is terrifying... We think that it is important to put a stop to this right away and make it as difficult as humanly possible to access this information." The new lawsuit, which Ferguson explained will be filed "within hours," comes just one day after Defense Distributed voluntarily agreed to block IP addresses from Pennsylvania after that state's attorney general filed a similar motion in federal court there. "Pennsylvania is still suing and we are still responding," Defense Distributed's founder, Cody Wilson, told Ars. Preemptively on Sunday, Defense Distributed sued the attorney general of New Jersey and the city attorney of Los Angeles to stop those lawsuits, largely on First Amendment grounds.

In this new 20-state initiative, the Washington attorney general argued that the State Department settlement violated the Administrative Procedure Act and also infringed upon states' Tenth Amendment right to regulate firearms within their own states. Ferguson pointed out, for example, people convicted of domestic abuse are flagged when they attempt to legally buy a gun. Allowing anyone to download and manufacture their own gun circumvents that process, he said. But Wilson told Ars it may be too late, as the files went up last Friday evening -- days before he said he would resume publishing them on August 1.

6 of 490 comments (clear)

  1. SCOTUS by Train0987 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They'll lose in the Supreme Court. This isn't just a Second Amendment issue, it's a First Amendment issue foremost.

    DD's lawyer is going to be famous after this case.

    1. Re:SCOTUS by sexconker · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even in Nazi California?

  2. Banned books week by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every september libraries have what is called "Banned Books Week"
     
    This is to highlight the problem with banning books and remind everyone that this is a terrible idea.
     
    I think we've firmly established, over and over, that banning books does not work.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:Banned books week by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do inform me when you find a book accurately detailing how to create a nuclear bomb. The FBI would also be interested.

      "Dire Dawn" by Hildegarde Hernandez? ;-p

      More seriously, a basic fission bomb isn't really all that hard to build. We did it with 1940's tech. Any halfway competent nuclear engineering student should know enough to do the design up...

      The difficulty isn't the design, it's the fissionables. Which you can't buy at the local drug store, contrary to popular rumour. Making Pu-239 requires a major engineering project. Hell, building the reactor to make the Pu-239 is something for billionaires, much less building the reprocessing facility to extract the Pu-239 (without poisoning it with other isotopes that suck up neutrons without producing excess energy)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  3. Where are the ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... money grubbers like gun manufacturers and their PAC, the NRA?

    DIY should be an issue like the fucking "right to repair," mess.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  4. Ok, this I take exception with by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    because it's a completely false sense of security. Fascists couldn't care less about your semi or even full auto rifles. By the time you're at the point where you're considering violence as a solution to Fascism it's much too late. They'll have seized control of the army and the food supply and the army will do what they're told like they always have so long as they've got pay and food. And you will not win against an organized army, let alone a modern one with the backing of the state.

    And don't point out the Taliban. We're letting them have that 40%. We got the important parts (the oil pipeline we wanted).

    If you want to prevent fascism you need to strip them of their favorite tool for seizing power: poverty. Seriously, look at every single fascist dictatorship and they all started with desperate poverty and an aristocracy that was abusing the working class.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/