Slashdot Mirror


Only a Small Percentage of Users Buy Stuff Through Alexa, Report Claims (arstechnica.com)

Analysts have been aggressively optimistic in their predictions about the growth of consumer shopping via virtual assistants like Amazon's Alexa, but a new report claims that only a small fraction of Alexa device owners shop with voice commands. And most of those who do only try it once or stick to a limited range of products. From a report: Two people who have been briefed on Amazon's "internal figures" told tech business publication The Information that only around 2 percent of people who own Alexa-equipped devices like those in Amazon's Echo line have ever made a purchase with Alexa. Of that 2 percent, about 90 percent tried it once and did not attempt it again after that, one of The Information's sources said. And even those users who regularly use Alexa to shop mainly do so for small purchases like household supplies.

67 comments

  1. Its so small its not even a whole number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its like .99 I mean how small is that ?!?!?

  2. I know two types of Echo owners by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first type is the most common - people who bought them because they were cheap and looked like a fun toy. These folks all played with it incessantly for a week or two, then put them away (one such friend told me he isn’t even sure where he put it).

    The second type are people like my sister. She set it up and still uses it regularly - but only to play background music in her living room. She’s never used it for anything else and is not interested in learning how to do so (although I did teach her younger son how to get it to fart).

    The only people I am aware of ever using the Echo for ordering anything are the guys on TWIT.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first type is the most common - people who bought them because they were cheap and looked like a fun toy. These folks all played with it incessantly for a week or two, then put them away (one such friend told me he isn’t even sure where he put it).

      The second type are people like my sister. She set it up and still uses it regularly - but only to play background music in her living room. She’s never used it for anything else and is not interested in learning how to do so (although I did teach her younger son how to get it to fart).

      The only people I am aware of ever using the Echo for ordering anything are the guys on TWIT.

      I think many people go through both phases like the missus: a year ago she received one as a birthday gift from her dad and for the first couple weeks I heard her talking to it and such but after that it too became a glorified Bluetooth speaker for the living room. Even guests hardly bother to address it or even notice it's presence.

    2. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used one since it was in beta (yeah, beta hardware apparently)- just got rid of it a few months ago. It was great in the kitchen, timers, reminders, conversions, music. I also used it to control some LEDs and a fan. It quickly became apparent that the time necessary to repeat yourself, to correct alexa, to fix comm issues (Im sorry, I dont understand), was far more wasted dealing with the echo than just turning on the damn light switch. And the apps... lol. "apps" hope you like cat jokes.

      As my echo review says on amazon - its a $100 phone app that comes with a bluetooth speaker. A good bluetooth speaker, but nevertheless.

    3. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use it almost every day to turn on a single lamp that didn't have a switch by the door. That is 90% of my use for it other than to sometimes read the news.

    4. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

      There is a third type -- those who use their Echos in combination with home control units of various sorts.

      If you have home control hardware for things like your entertainment centre, lights, fans, shades, thermostat, etc. being able to control them via a single voice unit is really slick. If you have a complex home entertainment setup, or light switches in dumb places, having your guests learn to ask Alexa to turn things on and off is often much easier for them.

      My 70yo mother can't figure out how to turn on our TV, as it requires turning on the surround receiver, the TV, and the DVR, and ensuring the surround receiver and TV are set to the correct inputs. But she quickly learned to say "Alexa, turn on the TV" and have all of that done for her automatically.

      The Echo (and like devices) become a lot more useful if there are other things in your home for them to integrate with.

      Yaz

    5. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by RickyShade · · Score: 2

      I use it almost every day to turn on a single lamp that didn't have a switch by the door. That is 90% of my use for it other than to sometimes read the news.

      I bought a Google Home for the same reason, just because I was tired of constantly having to get up off my desk every time I wanted to turn my light on (and then get back up again to turn it off). I spent $30 on a smart bulb and $30 on the Google Home literally just for that luxury LOL. I also use the Google Home to set countdown timers for tasks like doing chores, and to tell me the time when I'm laying in bed. I don't care for any of its other benefits--but I do dream of an automated Smart Home in the future.

    6. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This problem was already solved decades ago with a drastically smaller price tag and 100% less surveillance.

    7. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 70yo mother can't figure out how to turn on our TV, as it requires turning on the surround receiver, the TV, and the DVR, and ensuring the surround receiver and TV are set to the correct inputs. But she quickly learned to say "Alexa, turn on the TV" and have all of that done for her automatically.

      Or you could spend $20 on a universal remote with a macro feature.

    8. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Or you could spend $20 on a universal remote with a macro feature.

      I have one. She still found the voice control easier.

      Yaz

    9. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Still giving away all your privacy, turning your digital existence into an eSlave for a tiny bit of convenience, is it really worth it. For me, a microphone of camera, not in my home unless it is press to play (I do have a smart phone, it spends it's life in another room, I make calls on it, I do not like to receive calls on it and tend to ignore them, the land line with it's answering machine is for receiving calls, I'm older I used to enjoy driving to and from meetings away from the fucking phone).

      Yeah, you do not have to be as connected anywhere near as much as the crack head advertisements claim (advertisements for an addiction, a purposefully engineered addiction, schmucks). Honestly in the modern era, the best form of digital communication email and replying the next day, formulate your communications well, manners count in social interactions (it does need to be cleaned up and secured). You absolutely do not need to be in contact at all hours, at all times, the idea is insane.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      For me, a microphone of camera, not in my home unless it is press to play (I do have a smart phone, it spends it's life in another room

      You leak way more useful information through your smartphone than I do through my Echo. My Echo sits in one place. What does it matter that Amazon knows that I turn on my lights at night? Doesn't everyone do that anyway?

      You smart phone on the other hand sends a beacon everywhere it goes. You are easily tracked and traced through your phone. Your voice communication isn't encrypted, and your IMEI can be cloned so people can make calls or send texts as if they were you.

      I don't own a mobile phone of any sort. I too an old enough to remember the freedom of being out of communications when I step out the door, and vastly prefer things that way.

      Yaz

    11. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could spend $20 on a universal remote with a macro feature.

      I have one. She still found the voice control easier.

      Yaz

      Until she phones someone and tells "It is so easy these days, I just say 'Alexa, turn on the TV!' - damn, turn that off now!"

    12. Re:I know two types of Echo owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You smart phone on the other hand sends a beacon everywhere it goes.

      If I let it. This is the price of being able to receive calls. When I go burgling, I use flight mode to avoid that. When I go murdering, I mail the phone to myself, so I can claim I spent the night sleeping off the booze outside the regional post office.

  3. Can't confirm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've tried buying stuff from Alexa, but it's just so hard to determine what you're about to buy is actually the thing you want. The only time we actually go through with it is when we're rebuying something and recognize the exact name and cost, but that's pretty rare.

  4. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think this is news to anyone

  5. Objectively worse experience by Scoth · · Score: 1

    I have an Echo and use it for lots of random things, but shopping is objectively worse for most products. If I know exactly what I want, like I want to rebuy something consumable like the article talks about, I've used it a time or two. But for browsing or comparing products it's objectively worse than using a computer or even my phone where I can see all the specs/details right there and side by side, tab by tab, or whatever. I don't see myself ever really wanting to use it for more.

  6. Why is this a surprise? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't have any of these (spy) devices, but can't imagine I'd actually shop for stuff using it - certainly not things I hadn't already purchased before - because there's no way to review the items, like you can using a browser, to ensure it's really what you want. For things I've previously bought and am simply re-buying, like laundry soap, it might offer some, small, convenience, but not enough to have an always-listening device on my house. These things have always seemed more like a solution in search of a problem.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Why is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes 10 to 15 minutes to buy anything worth anything when I can read and see it on a screen. I wouldnt buy any material item sight unseen. Why would anyone want to. You think scams are bad now, wait til people post products that sound good, but are junk. Another bad road for consumers, but scammers will get rich. "But sir, we never said it was only a 3 in board, we said it was longer than our previous model" 20 bucks, delivered....... LMAO

  7. gEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is almost like just creating pathways for people to buy stuff doesn't necessarily mean they will buy anything or change their behavior. It is almost as though we are buying things within our budget and rarely actually need very much stuff.

    But then...LES GASP, le horror! That means the only way to stimulate purchasing is to PAY YOUR FUCKING EMPLOYEES PROPERLY. Something amazon knows very little about.

    An amazon employee even being able to afford one of their overpriced toys is highly unlikely.

    Why do they keep making this garbage while their own people are being fired just for getting injured for their miserable safety and employee work conditions? Why can't they stop making stupid assitants and start taking care of their own people? Why would I trust someone that treats their own workforce like garbage not to treat me the same way?

    1. Re:gEE by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      being fired just for getting injured for their miserable safety and employee work conditions

      Why can't people provide supporting links?!?? WHY! WHY!

  8. With friends like mine... by vanyel · · Score: 2

    The very first thing I did was disable the ability to buy things with my echo. Who knows *what* I'd have ended up with!

  9. Not every owner a fool? by DCFusor · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Surprising. While Amazon can reward careful shopping and jumping on "loss-leaders of opportunity", even prime members without one click ordering will get hosed if they don't pay attention. Often an "all prime" order I make will default one item to "same day or one day" shipping, adding >$50 to the price of a $5 thing. No sweat if you pay attention and click it back before submitting...do you have that chance with one click or Alexa?
    Further, dash buttons can be a real joke. I might order something that's right now a loss leader or at least a bargain compared to driving to the store for it - but when I need it again, the item on the dash button has doubled in price from the original loss leader. All this is common in brick and mortar, which is why you pay attention.
    .

    The evil is that some of these newer forms of transaction remove the ability to pay attention if you were so inclined, and if you weren't, fleece you on a whole new level.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    1. Re:Not every owner a fool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never had this happen... And I order from Amazon multiple times every week.

      I use Alexa pretty heavily to automate my house, but can't think of a single reason I would ever use it to order something. Dash buttons are the same. I don't use anything quickly enough that I need an emergency button to order it.

    2. Re:Not every owner a fool? by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      You are lucky. I have around 400 orders this year and it happens on about every 3rd one. I paid for prime 'free shipping' and defaulting to the most expensive alternative for just one item - usually the least pressing - on an order really stinks. They probably do lose some on me as I'm out in the boonies...most things come USPS when it's "two day" which is more often "3 day" - and I know this and don't care that much. The extra 50 bucks? I care. I'm already paying for prime. I built a LAN of things for homestead automation, it's on my website in part (most people can find me if they care). I don't need voice commands to do what I want done, so... And I sure don't need traffic on the internet for that stuff. In the boonies, it's slow, expensive, and unreliable when things like water, heat, electricity (I'm off grid) and so on are at stake.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  10. But 100% of the users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are definitely glad to have Amazon listening to their every conversation.

  11. Solution in search of a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most futuristic tech trends. No I won't be paying with my phone or shopping by voice command. Period.

    1. Re:Solution in search of a problem... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Millions of people all over the world are paying with their phones and have been doing so for the past few months/years.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  12. True for any new shopping method. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was the adoption curve for buying things with a credit card?

    What was the adoption curve for buying things over the Internet?

    Alexa is very much still in the novelty phase. It will take off eventually as it gains trust and ubiquity.

    1. Re:True for any new shopping method. by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

      I am not sure. Credit card shopping and the Internet did solve real issues, or improved existing experiences in significant ways. As things stand today, shopping with Alexa is a painstaking experience, that requires much more time and effort from you in comparison with what it would take if you just did it yourself. This is true, to a large extent, of almost anything that Alexa can do. It's cool to be able to command Alexa to turn on the dining room table light but, most of the time, it will be simpler and faster for you to flick the switch yourself by hand. Alexa, and the other digital assistants are 98% toys and 2% useful. Maybe they will eventually evolve into something really useful, but they have a very long way to go to get there.

    2. Re:True for any new shopping method. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the OP is younger and still has the mindset "anything new is better and anything old has to be replaced even if it works fine, just because it's old".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:True for any new shopping method. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credit cards drastically sped and improved the accuracy of the existing process of using a charge account at a store, at the cost of the customer carrying around a small object provided for free by the store/bank with their information embossed on it.

      Buying things over the internet solved the problems of restricted local product selection and people who refused to go out shopping in public due to laziness and/or crippling social anxiety.

      Alexa solves nothing and is expensive in its own right. It's another in a long line of attempts (one-click, dash buttons) by Amazon to maximize impulse purchase revenue and make it as effortless as humanly possible for you to give them your money even if it means degrading the shopping experience in every single other way.

    4. Re:True for any new shopping method. by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      Considering that paper checks still account for over 10 billion payments annually, don't expect voice-based purchases to make a blip on any radar in the next 5-10 years. It was just 6 years ago (2012) that ACH payments overtook paper checks. Even after my parents have died and gone to Heaven there will still be people paying by paper check.

      Source: https://www.federalreserve.gov...

      The last time my parent's wanted to buy me something they saw online: they emailed me the homepage of the store (rather than the direct URL of the item), a description of the item, and asked me to pay for it myself; then they asked me to tell them what the total was so they could snail mail me a check for the exact amount of the purchase. :|

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  13. Perfectly normal by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "And most of those who do only try it once or stick to a limited range of products."

    I use it to buy stuff I already know, repeatedly.

    Perhaps blind people use it extensively but most of us like to see at least a crappy photograph of the product.

    But you can buy detergent from the couch instead of walking to the washing machine and press the dash button.

    I can buy stuff at Amazon with Alexa, dash buttons, cellphones, tablets and computers, where else is that possible.

  14. it takes too long by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

    if i buy food online from jet.com or costco it's a few minutes to add stuff to the cart and check out. with alexa i have to tell it to buy stuff one item at a time. and with amazon you have no control of the vendor or the price compared to the website.

  15. Its a novelty to many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siri was a novelty for many too, and quickly become clear it wasn't as useful as most had hoped. Alexa was built to assist in ordering stuff from Amazon and I have yet to use mine to do so. I buy from Amazon all the time, but I like to see stuff and surf prices and deals. Alexa makes this way to difficult to do. Its also not to intelligent and I gave up asking any moderately difficult question because it cannot answer them. My wife and I use it for music on Prime and that's about it. What we know now, we probably would not have bought it. Personally a lot of Amazon devices leave me a bit unimpressed over time.

  16. Paper towels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I buy trivial junk like this every 4-6 months, in bulk. Why would I ever use some toy speaker to buy them, and have them delivered?

    These sort of trivial items aren't the kind of thing I'd ever buy online, and it's a waste of money. I couldn't imagine buying TP, paper towels, laundry detergent, toothpaste, etc online. Why? I make one bug shopping trip and buy them every so often. That's not hard. Having trivial every day items like this shipped just seems wasteful and silly.

    The things I buy online are things that are either hard to find items (vacuum cleaner bags are often a freaking pain to find the right one), or something where I do significant searching to find something I like, and is cheaper online, has more selection, and doesn't suck up hours upon hours finding driving to a store just to buy a wall mounted shop vac, which they don't have at the box store anyway. I'll even buy oil filters online for the same reason.. it's a somewhat specialty item that's marked up at auto parts stores, is cheaper online, and you don't have to make a special trip to the auto parts store. I doubt Alexa is going to be trained to know which oil filter I need for the car, AND can do comparison shopping.

    Common commodities are by definition not special, and are normally cheap items that you'd pay more for to have shipped.

  17. Doesn't Matter, They'll Get You Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They listen, they learn, soon the terms of service will change and they'll listen and learn more. They'll hear key words, tone, emotion, things that are harder to get with Tweets and FB posts.

    And you will be subtly motived to buy things based on what they learn. Having a corporation listen in on you is as insane as having the government do it.

    Know why milk is always in the back corner of the grocery store? You'd think with so many people running in to get a gallon of milk for the kids they'd make it easy, and put it in the front, but the store owners want you to go all the way through the store, past every aisle, and maybe think "as long as I'm here"...

    They manipulate you and you don't even realize it.

    1. Re:Doesn't Matter, They'll Get You Later by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Fancy that. I don't remember ever having bought milk and anything else, when I just wanted milk. I do remember buying Kit-Kats and nothing else though.

    2. Re:Doesn't Matter, They'll Get You Later by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      Know why milk is always in the back corner of the grocery store? ... the store owners want you to go all the way through the store, past every aisle, and maybe think "as long as I'm here"...They manipulate you and you don't even realize it.

      I realise perfectly well what they are trying to do, and it so annoys me that I'm damned if I will do it. Another example is UK motorway service buildings where you must run the entire zig-zag gauntlet of coffee shops, confectionery stalls, gambling arcades, and tat shops (all over-priced) to reach the toilets. That's why when I stop for a piss I prefer to park in the lorry area which often accesses the place via a back door short cut, or even has a separate lorry drivers' shithouse.

  18. seems to easy to make mistakes via voice by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hey Alexa, buy me a Toy Yoda"

    Alexa: "one Toyota will be parked in your driveway by morning, it will cost 32 thousand dollars"

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:seems to easy to make mistakes via voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hotel greased up Yoda Doll!

      sucha lovely place.
      sucha lovely place

    2. Re:seems to easy to make mistakes via voice by antdude · · Score: 1

      And then the lawsuit! http://www.snopes.com/fact-che...

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. Hardly surprising by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The truth is the Alexa, Google Assistant, etc. are remarkably unintelligent and undiscerning. They can do very constrained and stereotyped tasks fairly well, but introduce a minimum of ambiguity, and they start spinning their wheels badly. Even when dealing with simple queries, their lack of understanding is irksome - e.g. if you tell any of them "Do not, under any circumstances, give me the weather forecast" they all promptly and efficiently give you the weather forecast. It will be some time before these gadgets become useful for significantly more than grins and giggles and party games.

  20. What did they expect?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alexa, send me a new TV set.
    Alexa send me a new outfit.
    Alexa, send me a new throttle cable bracket for my lawnmower.....nice if it worked, but who would bother to load all their tools, etc ahead of time just in case.

    Really?

    I can think of a couple consumables that might work. Maybe she can reorder ink cartridges.
    Do people not buy detergent at the grocery store? It is only one aisle over, one can't be THAT lazy !

    1. Re: What did they expect?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy half of my groceries from amazon.

  21. I have ordered through the echo but by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    I have placed three orders using the echo. you really cannot trust amazon to get the product you want at the cheapest price. Too many times I tried but the price was so much higher than if I went to Amazon online and order it from there.

    There is also one other issue about ordering through the echo, security! I have it set up to require a pin number before the order will go through. You cannot use the pin when others are around because it would give them access to your credit card and they would be able to order on your dime. They need to come with a better way to keep your account secure.

    1. Re:I have ordered through the echo but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really cannot trust amazon to get the product you want at the cheapest price. Too many times I tried but the price was so much higher than if I went to Amazon online and order it from there

      Are you serious? I can't believe Amazon would sell people a product that advises them to buy more products from Amazon at an even higher price. Make no mistake, you dodged a bullet by adopting this thing early and confounding it with your financial information.

    2. Re:I have ordered through the echo but by jimbo · · Score: 1

      Not only that but a lot of the smaller prime items have gone up in price. Quite often I find now items that are no longer the cheapest or even same price on Amazon as the local "megamart" and usually I don't *have* to have those next-day, I can wait till next week when I'm going anyway.

  22. obligatory xkcd by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  23. Voice Systems can't distinguish "Yes" and "No" by nukenerd · · Score: 2

    My heart sinks when I phone an organisation and it wants me to use voice commands. In my experience they often can't even distinguish between "Yes" and "No". Even when I try loud and exagerated, like " YEEEEES! " and " NOOOOOH! ". Yet I speak with a clear "educated" English accent (and this in the UK). How the hell Scotsmen from Aberdeen or the immigrants who can hardly pronounce English get on I can't imagine.

    The most stupid thing was phoning BT (the phone company) to report a faulty line. You have to describe to a robot why you are phoning them, but this was (obviously) over a faulty line with crackles and buzzes going on. I was yelling " FAULTY LINE!! ", and it was saying "I'm sorry, I did not catch that. Did you want to pay your bill?". Idiots, you'd think they would have a special number for line faults and have a person answer; I dumped BT after that shitwreck.

    Do some people really try to do shopping like that?

    1. Re:Voice Systems can't distinguish "Yes" and "No" by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Do some people really try to do shopping like that?

      Voice controlled home units are often significantly better at recognizing and parsing speech than phone menu systems are. For one, requests are processed in the cloud, where the likes of Amazon, Google, and Apple have a lot more processing power than your typical phone tree system does. And secondly, unlike a phone tree system that has to try to understand everybody, a voice control unit like the Echo can be trained specifically for your voice (on the Echo, just say "Alexa, learn my voice" and follow the directions).

      Yaz

    2. Re:Voice Systems can't distinguish "Yes" and "No" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet I speak with a clear "educated" English accent (and this in the UK)

      Most people will have no idea what accent you're referring to as the nuances of English accents are opaque to most of us.

      All I know is some English accents are closer to speech impediments than anything ... like the loss of the ability to say "th" and turning it into "ff". Some sounds have just been hopelessly lost to those accents.

    3. Re: Voice Systems can't distinguish "Yes" and "No" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Baff" is not an "educated" accent...

    4. Re:Voice Systems can't distinguish "Yes" and "No" by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Most people will have no idea what accent you're referring to as the nuances of English accents are opaque to most of us.

      It does not matter if they know what I am referring to - my point is that I don't have some edge case accent and therefore the voice recognition ought to be able to handle it.

      I think if you heard a variety of UK accents (so including Scottish, Northern Irish, and Welsh, as well as English) you would realise some differences were more than just nuances. Leaving out the immigrants, there are "educated" Scottish (eg Sean Connery), "educated" Welsh (eg Anthony Hopkins), as well as "educated" English (eg Colin Firth, Hugh Grant, BBC announcers) accents, and also vernacular regional accents that even I sometimes cannot understand, despite living here.

    5. Re:Voice Systems can't distinguish "Yes" and "No" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not matter if they know what I am referring to - my point is that I don't have some edge case accent and therefore the voice recognition ought to be able to handle it.

      As always, these things will depend heavily on the data it was trained with. I suspect the systems you're hitting don't have a broad enough sample. Which you'd think on your side of the pond they'd try harder.

      I think if you heard a variety of UK accents (so including Scottish, Northern Irish, and Welsh, as well as English) you would realise some differences were more than just nuances.

      Oh, I was being generous ... because oddly enough, I've met people from all of those places, and from lots of other places ... and for a Canadian white guy who hasn't travelled much, I'm actually fairly good at being able to hear through most accents without too much difficulty. I know it's far more than 'nuance' when it comes to regional accents in the UK. But I can tell the difference between the Scottish, Irish, and English accents, and I can also tell the difference between the Aussie and the New Zealand accents. I've known people with accents from pretty much everywhere.

      also vernacular regional accents that even I sometimes cannot understand, despite living here.

      Oh, I definitely have heard some of those ... and I agree they're nigh on incomprehensible for someone not accustomed to them ... I met some Welshmen in Cuba one time, and one of them I could barely make out a single word and had to apologise profusely because I felt like an idiot.

      Hell, I've seen British movies and TV shows where they sub-title some of the people because they have such thick local accents (real or acted).

      Cheers

  24. What is actually convenient? by jetkust · · Score: 1

    Is it really less trouble to use Alexa than just using an app or website? I think most people choose the method where they believe the least amount of problems can occur, and not necessarily the "fastest". That doesn't translate to using Alexa for most people. Same reason I always call in takeout orders instead of using an app. I just feel like i'm less likely to have issues doing it that way.

    1. Re:What is actually convenient? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have this newfangled concept where you get to see little pictures of products on a screen, with prices and everything! You can compare similar products, so convenient!

      No problems if there is noise/rap music in the room either. And you place your order with the click of a finger, so no possibility of other people ordering through your system - not even if they somehow got hold of a recording of your voice. You can shop silently for embarassing items!

  25. typical hype cycle by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    soon we will have Alexa HD; 2 years later Alexa 3D; then we will forget about it; then someone will come back with amazing Alexa 2.0.

  26. Even Longer Ago Than That: X10 by computersareevil · · Score: 2

    The Clapper is only two decades old. The X10 System is four decades old and much more useful. It's the original electronic home automation system.

    I still use X10 to control more than a dozen lights with timers, day/night detectors, motion sensors, and manual controls. I control a few fail-safe appliances with it too. The modules and controllers are cheap and plentiful, you can still buy them new if you wish. The protocol is completely open and there are myriad computer interfaces. Most Free/free HA software will readily use X10 modules.

    X10 lamp modules were a little wonky with CFL bulbs, but the massive shift to LEDs has solved that problem. LED bulbs work 100% with 30+ year-old X10 modules including dimming. The only real downside is no two-way verification (with standard modules), and the vampire draw is higher than modern stuff. (I think. Could be wrong there.)

    The best parts? 100% Under my complete control with no mandatory "cloud" connection or privacy leaks or Internet-exposed firmware that will never be updated. You don't need a EULA to use it or read a Privacy Statement to see what they are stealing.

  27. Re:Even Longer Ago Than That: X10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mandatory cloud connection to "home base" is how they make sure you can't buy one and keep it running for 40 years. And network access is absolutely critical for the "security updates" that wouldn't be needed if wasn't connected to an outward-facing network.

    I feel bad for all the 'futurists' who are filling their lives with this crap. They're going to be real sorry when they've reduced the world to rent-based microservices with built-in expiration, because eventually - someone's going to turn it all off.

  28. Re:Even Longer Ago Than That: X10 by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    The Clapper is only two decades old.

    The Clapper can only control one light. Alexa controls lights throughout my house. I can also use it to start my robotic vacuum, unlock the front door, answer questions, give me a news briefing and summarize my schedule while I prepare breakfast.

    The X10 System is four decades old and much more useful.

    I used X10 back in the 1990s. It was a failure for good reasons. It was hard to setup, difficult to use, and failed often. It also did not respond to voice commands. Alexa is way more capable, and way more popular.

    Disclaimer: I have never used Alexa to order anything.

  29. Re:Even Longer Ago Than That: X10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used X10 back in the 1990s. It was a failure for good reasons. It was hard to setup, difficult to use, and failed often. It also did not respond to voice commands. Alexa is way more capable, and way more popular.

    Disclaimer: I have never used Alexa to order anything.

    Your assertions are mostly false:

    1. X10 was and continues to be a success. Unless you consider continuous use and sale for 43 years "failure"?

    2. X10 hard to setup? How? Maybe if you lack opposable digits! Set the code on a module using physical wheels on the module (no "app" to load on your phone. Oh, wait it's IOS 11.223.43R9 only? Shit!), set the same code on a controller, plug them in, andthey just work. Oh, you might have to get a dime or a penny to use as a tool to set to code. Rough, right?

    3. X10 rarely fails. Again, you must lack opposable thumbs. I've never had a module fail, including an original brown BSR appliance module from the mid-1970's still in daily use. There are situations where signals will be unreliable, but I've never had a problem and I've lived in many apartments and densely-populated cities. There are filters and bridges that cost less than a Prime membership that solve those problems. It may be more reliable than Alexa since it doesn't rely on external servers running only at the whim of a billionaire.

    4. Not everybody wants voice response, or a 24/7 remote spying device in their home. Even so, X10 has been responding to voice commands since before Alexa was a twinkle in Bezos' eye.

    5. Alexa may be able to do more. But by your own admission it does things you don't need. If X10 does what I need, why would I want to tether myself to a third party interested only in selling me more stuff?

    6. More popular? Possible, but where's your proof? This whole story is about people not using Alexa. It's still at the Peak of Inflated Expectations stage of the Technology Hype Cycle. Meanwhile X10 has 40+ years of solid productivity behind it.

  30. liberal spy devices by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1
  31. Trying it once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people who tried online shopping via the Echo exactly one time, probably bought a Dot, when they first came out and were just available via Alexa.

  32. There isn't a day that goes by that I don't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Echo Dot in the living room and a Fire TV Cube in the bedroom (sounds backwards but fits my needs better this way.) All of my light fixtures that use regular bulbs have TP-Link Kasa bulbs and I have a fan in each room plugged into TP-Link Kasa smart outlets. There is also a Nest thermostat in the hallway. Every day once I walk through the door I tell Alexa to turn on the bedroom fan (computer is in there where I spend most of the night.) Light bulbs are all automated but 3-4 nights a week I will tell Alexa to turn one or more bulbs off if I don't need them for the night. The light fixtures themselves are in far corners of the rooms they are in, out of reach. At night I throw on some headphones and listen to music through the Echo Dot, using an Echo Remote w/ Alexa to play requested music. Specific songs, specific albums, various genres, as well as a Playlist I maintain on the Amazon website.

    The monetization of all of this for Amazon is a $3.99/month Echo Music Unlimited subscription. $48 a year isn't bad for a device that I paid $29 for (not including the Cube which I mainly use for Prime video content but also Alexa commands.)

    I cannot fathom why anyone would want to shop by voice, to me that's the same thing as shopping by text message. I'm not going to SMS Domino's asking for a pizza, and I'm certainly not going to browse Amazon by voice to see if anything is on sale cheap enough that I might want to make a purchase. Millionaires with no concern about purchases less than $1,000 may have no problem ordering all their crap by voice or subscription but not me, I'm too price sensitive and need to browse and compare with other sites before making a purchase. It's the same reason all those Amazon buttons are being dumped in landfills. They charge to much for commodity items anyways, especially food.