Slashdot Mirror


NASA's Newest Spacecraft Will Fly Through the Sun's Scorching Hot Atmosphere (theverge.com)

In T-minus three days, NASA will launch a car-sized spacecraft to investigate our Sun's scorching hot atmosphere. "The vehicle is the Parker Solar Probe, and it's set to launch at 3:33AM ET on Saturday, August 11th, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. "It'll be riding on a Delta IV Heavy rocket made by the United Launch Alliance, which will send the probe zooming toward the inner Solar System," reports The Verge. "Just six weeks after launch, Parker will do a flyby of Venus to alter its route slightly, and then six weeks later, the vehicle will be in the corona. Over the course of seven years, Parker will do 24 orbits around the star, as well as six more Venus flybys so that it can get even closer to the Sun's surface over time." From the report: NASA has long wanted to send a vehicle to the Sun's atmosphere, but such a mission has been considered impossible until the last few decades. This region of space, known as the corona, is filled with tiny, energetic particles that can reach above 3 million degrees Fahrenheit. Any vehicle that ventures near this region must have sophisticated protection to keep from melting. But thanks to advancements in carbon manufacturing and other key areas of engineering, NASA has been able to create a vehicle with a state-of-the-art heat shield and other crucial cooling systems. The result: the spacecraft will stay at room temperature in some of the hottest places in the Solar System.

The Sun's corona is actually 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun, and no one understands why. The region gets so hot that chunks of the corona actually accelerate and break away from the immense pull of the Sun at supersonic speeds. These so-called solar winds shoot highly energized particles out in all directions, which then slam into surrounding planets. Parker is tasked with investigating the mechanics of the breakaway effect and why the atmosphere is so much hotter than its source.

96 comments

  1. OB by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing hard about that. Let's see them do it during the day.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I see what you did there..

      The Sun's corona is actually 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun, and no one understands why. The region gets so hot that chunks of the corona actually accelerate and break away from the immense pull of the Sun at supersonic speeds. These so-called solar winds shoot highly energized particles out in all directions,

      Fucking plasma physics, rotating magnetic fields and CMEs, how do they work.

      My eyes, I watched to long what you did there!

    2. Re:OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3:33 Really? Like the mason 33 level or something .....

    3. Re:OB by mrbester · · Score: 1

      They need metaphasic shielding for that.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:OB by quenda · · Score: 1

      Such a pity they called it "Parker".
      Was "Icarus" already taken?

    5. Re: OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they have evidence that the sun is the actual hell - the never ending burning âpitâ(TM). Lol.

      So letâ(TM)s see.

    6. Re:OB by habig · · Score: 2

      Such a pity they called it "Parker". Was "Icarus" already taken?

      From TFA:

      Eugene Parker published a new theory about how stars release energy. He predicted that the atmospheres of stars like our Sun get so hot that they are continually flowing outward, bathing all the planets around them in particles. Parker came up with the term “solar wind” to describe this phenomenon.

      He's also done a whole lot with magnetic fields and astrophysics in general: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      So, we can name it after an extremely successful astrophysicist, or after a rather-not-so-successful ancient greek kid :)

    7. Re:OB by habig · · Score: 1

      Whoops, forgot the last line of that post: yes, Icarus is already taken, at least by a neutrino experiment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... as well as a solar sailing spacecraft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  2. Re: Delta IV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because space-x isnâ(TM)t the only game in town you musk groupie

  3. Car-sized? by Daralantan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like a good way to destroy Musk's Roadster!

    1. Re:Car-sized? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Car-sized...300 times hotter...nothing about how close the probe will get or what temperatures it will endure.

      How can they use that many words yet manage to say absolutely nothing?

    2. Re:Car-sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "scorching hot". Them's some great prose there.

    3. Re:Car-sized? by Anonymice · · Score: 1

      Um...

      This region of space, known as the corona, is filled with tiny, energetic particles that can reach above 3 million degrees Fahrenheit.

      Which for the rest of the world, translates as "above 1.5 million degrees Celsius".

    4. Re: Car-sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They managed to mention farenheits whatever they are.

    5. Re:Car-sized? by fedos · · Score: 1

      The article pretty much focuses on the temperatures. If you want to know about how close it gets, you should check out this new fangled thing called the internet.

      It will approach to within 8.86 solar radii (6.2 million kilometers or 3.85 million miles) from the "surface" (photosphere) of the Sun and will travel, at closest approach, as much as 700,000 km/h (430,000 mph).

    6. Re:Car-sized? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      How can they use that many words yet manage to say absolutely nothing?

      You haven't read reports on when a solar event or something similar is going to happen, have you? Literally everything about the event will be discussed EXCEPT the actual time to look for said event.

      Generally it's something like, "On Friday, look to the southwest. . ." Okay fine. Friday. What time zone? What time specifically?

      It's amazing how this one bit of information is repeatedly left out. Many times the web page for the event is even lacking this crucial bit of information.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    7. Re: Car-sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or ten hot pockets

    8. Re:Car-sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, once you get into the millions of degrees, what difference does it make? The general idea being REALLY DAMN HOT. Incomprehensibly hot, really in Celsius or Fahrenheit.

  4. Is That Fast? by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    chunks of the corona actually accelerate and break away from the immense pull of the Sun at supersonic speeds.

    What's the speed of sound at the surface of the Sun, compared to sea level on Earth?

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Is That Fast? by shayd2 · · Score: 1

      Since the speed of sound depends on gas density (among other things) this is one of the thing they'll have a chance of learning

    2. Re:Is That Fast? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am guessing this is just part of the poor quality in science reporting. Because they don't want to use the international standard of speeds of American Foot Ball Fields per second.

      While I guess they are talking about speeds of a few thousands kph which would seem fast in terrestrial terms. However in astronomy terms it is rather slow.

       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Is That Fast? by Bengie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Very low then. Sun's surface is 100,000 less dense than Earths atmosphere at sea level.

    4. Re:Is That Fast? by mikael · · Score: 2

      Between 8000 and 9600 meters/second. But there is so much turbulence and magnetic field flux that it is like wanting to know the speed of sound inside a fireball.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Is That Fast? by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a pet hate of mine - talking about x-times the speed of sound in the upper atmosphere. At -90 C in the Mesosphere the speed of sound is 271 m/s - 80% of that at sea level (ISA).

      I know that they actually mean x-times 340 m/s, and at high multiples the effects are nigh-on meaningless, but when Felix Baumgartner made his jump the ambiguity was that he achieved Mach 1.25 (t=-50 C, a=300 m/s, v=1357 km/h), but using the above assumption you'd think he achieved 1,530 km/h.

      I'm looking forward to a pedant pointing out mistakes in my pedantry!

    6. Re:Is That Fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is like wanting to know the speed of sound inside a fireball.

      "Like" that? Seems to me it's exactly that.

      What's sound behave like inside a fireball? I've never stuck my ear inside one.

    7. Re:Is That Fast? by shayd2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the speed of sound goes UP with pressure. So it will be much higher

    8. Re:Is That Fast? by mikael · · Score: 1

      There is so much turbulence inside a fireball with volumes of gas expanding and compressing faster than sound waves can travel across them. However, with the Sun, there are sound waves that travel across the interior:

      https://www.livescience.com/62...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:Is That Fast? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      chunks of the corona actually accelerate and break away from the immense pull of the Sun at supersonic speeds.

      What's the speed of sound at the surface of the Sun, compared to sea level on Earth?

      Probably doesn't matter. So long as the corona hits you before you hear it breaking away, it's super sonic. Although really, this is outer space, so they should have used the prefix of hyper- instead.

  5. What i want to know by maroberts · · Score: 1

    is that if they can keep a satellite at room temperature whilst dipping itself in the corona of the sun, why is aircon complicated, unreliable and expensive?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:What i want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because aircon implies airflow, as in, you need to cycle air in and out of your home so you don't run out of oxygen.
      No such concerns for an unmanned craft.

    2. Re: What i want to know by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      There is a difference between keeping something that is cool from getting hot and removing heat from something already hot in order to cool it. This would be like building a house out of materials that prevent heat from penetrating to begin with. If you do a good enough job of that, there is less of a need for AC, outside of removing waste heat generated inside of the home.

    3. Re:What i want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because heat and tempereature are two different things. I bet the corona is an extremly thin gas. Meaning that even though it is crazy hot, there is very little energy in it per volume. Temperature is the average speed (i.e energy) of molecules in a substance. While heat is the total energy. So even though the corona is a few million degrees celcius, a cubic meter of it might contain way less heat (energy) than one cubic meter of pleasantly body warm pool water.

      To keep cool you need to move heat from one place and dump it somewhere else.

    4. Re:What i want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heat pumps are reliable. Your fridge or freezer can live for 20-30 years with no maintenance.
      Aircon needs to move a lot more heat a lot faster, which means forcing contaminated indoor (dust) and outdoor (soot, moisture, acid rain) air through radiators if you want the device to be of practical size. This means it's more complicated, deals with larger amounts of energy, and is subject to more wear and tear.

    5. Re:What i want to know by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1. Size: This is a car sized device. the electronics they need to keep cool is probably a small box.
      2. Lifespan: Your AC probably works well for a couple of years then become unreliable. There is no chance of us trying to get this device back. The system will work for a while and will die.
      3. Environment: Water, Dirt, Dust, Bugs, Hair. will get into your AC system and muck it up. vs operating in a vacuum.
      4. Cost: If you want you 12x12x8 foot room to have reliable AC you probably will need to spend millions of dollars in latest material tech to retrofit it. Or just pay a fraction of that total cost, with getting your AC Fixed every few years. I am not sure why you think a satellite cooling system is cheap?

      Compared to most things standard Air Conditioning is Simple, Reliable and Cheap.
      You can build one yourself with an icebox, a small pump, some metal piping (copper is probably easiest) and a room fan. You can probably fix your yourself with some quick searching. However it is probably cheaper and easier just to replace a home unit. Or replace a part.

       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:What i want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Aircon is expensive because you and most all other people are willing to pay that amount for it.

    7. Re:What i want to know by quenda · · Score: 2

      I bet the corona is an extremly thin gas.

      Plasma, not gas. Density is a trillionth that of the solar surface, which itself is a trillionth the density of water. So yeah, I guess you might call it thin.

      Calculating ... a volume of corona the size of the Earth might weigh on the order of a kilogram. (or a gram or a ton? not much anyway)

    8. Re:What i want to know by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Aircon

      You keep talking about this "aircon." Let me guess: you eat vegemite or some other ghastly substance unfit for consumption by proper English speakers... ;)

    9. Re:What i want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Radiant heat from the sun will dominate, and it will be extremely high. It's 1300 W/m2 here at earth (without the atmosphere blocking some of it). Closer to the sun this will be much greater, and the sun will take up much more of the satellites sky. The surface temperature of the sun (that solar radiation is going to heat the leading skin of your spacecraft to) is almost 10,000 F or 5,500 C. This is well above the temperature that any material stays solid, so ablative heat shielding is the only option. This takes up precious weight. The good thing, is coming from the earth, the probe will fling off into space after each flyby, allowing it to cool, and transmit data.

    10. Re:What i want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, this isn't going through a thick atmosphere. It doesn't have to be ablative, just very high emissivity. Going through the earth's atmosphere gives compression heating and erosion, which lends itself to ablation. However, the particle flux in the corona is very low, and the energy is almost all radiative, so a reflective shield is a fine approach, and in fact is the one used.

  6. Re:Delta IV by oneiros27 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because it's been planned for YEARS.

    You don't build a satellite, then get the lowest bidder. You have to figure out where you want the spacecraft, then which launch vehicles are powerful enough to get something around the weight you estimate into the proper place. Then you have all of the fiddly bits to make sure it's small enough and light enough so you can still reach the right orbit.

    (disclaimer: I used to work for the Solar Data Analysis Center)

    STEREO's launch was almost delayed (even further than it already was because of the strike + spy satellites cutting in line) because they had to swap to a heavier battery for the self destruct of the second stage ... JPL managed to find an alternate orbit that they could achieve with the extra weight that would still let the mission have a chance at accomplishing its goals.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  7. To fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The highest melting point of the known matter (Tungsten) is 3422 Celsius. Not 1 million Celsius as the people does think.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  8. "In T minus 3 days" ?! Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess "In T minus 3 days" sounds "technical" and "spacey" ?
    To a non-technical person who wants to post on a site that used to have news for nerds.

    1. Re:"In T minus 3 days" ?! Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it took you a while to figure out what it meant.

    2. Re: "In T minus 3 days" ?! Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just pathetic, itâ(TM)s wrong. Happens 3 days ago?

    3. Re: "In T minus 3 days" ?! Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even.
      It means they are saying something will happen "(3 days prior to launch time) from now".
      They are using an absolute time for a time relative to now.
      It's like using light years to measure time, ignorant and incorrect.
      But it sounds "spacey", so it's fine for a "news for nerds" site's editors.

  9. timetravel programmed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after a couple of trial ....
    finally the spacecraft will timetravel to the past.

    1. Re:timetravel programmed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are they going to fit two whales inside that thing?

    2. Re:timetravel programmed ... by bobbied · · Score: 3, Funny

      How are they going to fit two whales inside that thing?

      The same way they deal with the "Transparent aluminum" problem. "Laddie, shall I just punch up clear?"

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  10. Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're going to arrive in the winter.

  11. Heatwave protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we have umbrellas and clothes made of this material for next summer? I'd love to be protected by materials... DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE SUN'S CORONA.

  12. Re:WHY FARENHEIT by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right, because 2 million K or C is soooooo much more accessible than 3 million F. It just means "really really hot". They are giving us one significant digit in a 7-place number.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  13. Do you Review your sources? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    Carbon
    Tungsten
    Carbon Sublimation point 3915 K (3642 C, 6588 F)
    Tungsten Melting point 3695 K (3422 C, 6192 F)

    Carbon is a fun element, that is why we like to make materials out of it. It can be arranged in a lot of ways, plus we can mix it with a lot of other elements. Sometimes the trick isn't to absorb all the heat but transfer it somewhere else.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  14. Re:Room Temperature? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If we have the technology to keep part of it at room temperature, then we should have sent actual astronauts instead.

    And I am sure you are the first to volunteer to shoot around the sun at 450,000 mph for 7 years in a craft that will most likely be sent spiraling into the Sun once the mission is complete. Oh, yeah, and because the heat shield is only on one side of the craft, any error in attitude means the craft melts and you die a horribly painful but probably pretty quick death.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  15. Design Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you even get to a point where you can choose the right instrumentation for a job like that? I mean how do you know which instruments would be useful to investigate the Corona?

    All kinds of cameras (that measure different wave-lengths)?

    A pocket-sized Laser-Interferometer for detecting Gravitational waves would be cool. But I doubt that we are there yet.

    Side-note: It seems that every-time I read about a probe, I discover that it was a replacement of a probe that was struck down due to budget cuts. NASA seems quite vulnerable too this. I wonder if ESA faces similar problems?

    1. Re: Design Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes so amazing! Gee! Also I wonder how they could ever build something like slashdot, and keep it alive till this day.

    2. Re:Design Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you kind soul for downvoting this question.

      The answer is: Apparently they do a "Call for Experiments" and then select amongst them.

      https://sppgway.jhuapl.edu/instruments

  16. Re: Delta IV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk wamts to go to Mars and this is in the opposite direction.

  17. hotter one the ouside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe if a item has say 6 degrees of freedom to vibrate in, then restricting 2 degrees will make the other 4 vibrate more.
    thus if a item is susceptible to a electro-magneticfield, say, like caught in a spiderweb, then adding energy (heat) will allow it to reach higher vibration freuqenzy faster?

    of course one could argue, that this cannot work, because the energy added just is wasted on the electro-magnetic field (the spiderweb). but consider the special case of the sun, where the particle never was really free: it was "born: inside the sun and was not captured from the outside. thus the "life-story" of a star-born particle is different then one liberated and recaptured?

    anyways, let's hope the gathered data gets published far and wide.

  18. Why is the corona so much hotter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't anyone hear of convection heating?

    The sun is a big ball of magnetism. These charged particles get stuck in these bands of magnetism and go round and round kinda like... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ipZ4vdivbU

    Was that so hard to figure out????

    Nathan

    1. Re:Why is the corona so much hotter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > radiation is the transfer of energy with the help of electromagnetic waves.

      Also fail. See alpha or beta radiation, which are particles, not electromagnetic waves.

      Source: I worked with radiation physicists for 10+ years in a major hospital that trains radiation physicists.

    2. Re:Why is the corona so much hotter? by jbengt · · Score: 2

      It's almost 100% conduction any time you want to talk about heating and cooling things on Terra Firma

      Not really.
      Heat from many kitchen appliances is about 25% radiant, depending on the type of appliance and the amount of conduction/convection captured by any hood.
      Heat from the average active office worker is about 20% to35% conduction/convection, 25% to 40% radiant, and 30% to 50% sweating (latent heat)
      Heat from office equipment ranges from 10% to 40% radiant. And heat gain through a sunlight window is mostly radiant.
      Even a window at night in the winter loses a significant amount of heat through radiation, unless it has a low-e coating.

  19. Re:Delta IV by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Because Musk is too busy launching military and spy satellites into LEO. Science isn't profitable enough.

  20. Radiation by JBMcB · · Score: 4, Informative

    The heat from the sun is almost entirely radiant. The only particles leaving the sun are helium atoms, which are really hot but they don't transfer a lot of heat. So, basically, you cover the probe in a whole bunch of very reflective foil and that's enough to keep the thing cool enough. If you look at the pictures, there's a big heat shield on one end (probably foil-covered ceramic) and the rest is covered in foil.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The sun's surface is at almost 10,000 deg F. Even if you manage to reflect 99% of the incoming radiation, your reflector will not remain solid. The heat shield must be ablative.

      Airconditioning won't work here. The view angle of the Sun will be at least 90 degrees. Even with a highly emissive side and a highly reflective side, your steady state temperature will be at least 3000 deg F. But I bet they aren't going to enter a circular orbit around the sun (it takes an enormous amount of thrust to slow down that close to a body that massive). They will fly past it and return to deeper space. The probe the Russians sent to Venus had dry ice to provide thermal mass, which gave them a few hours of operation on the surface. With a heat shield, the best insulation money can buy, and some thermal mass at the center, I bet they can do multiple fly bys. Trying to pump heat up a temperature gradient of 1000+ degrees takes too much energy/space/weight.

    2. Re:Radiation by Dracolytch · · Score: 2

      I work at the laboratory where this spacecraft was designed and built, and I did work on the craft a very little bit. For this mission into the Sun's corona, the outside temperatures will be upwards of 1400C. The heat shield is a 11.5 cm thick carbon composite shield. It is not ablative. The shield is at a distance from much of the craft as to create a large enough umbra to contain all the components. Anything that falls outside the umbra would be cooked to a crisp. The solar arrays retract, so that when the sunlight is 475x times what we get on Earth they can stay nice and cool in the umbra.

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  21. Re:WHY FARENHEIT by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Leela: Fry, night lasts two weeks on the moon.
    Moon Farmer: Yep, drops down to minus-173.
    Fry: Celsius or Fahrenheit?
    Moon Farmer: First one, then the other.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  22. Thunderbolts project by greylion3 · · Score: 0

    The Thunderbolts Project did a video about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (if you've studied the Electric Universe theory, the corona's temperature is no mystery)

    --
    Privacy begins with ..
  23. "In T-Minus three days"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In T-Minus three days"? Someone is trying to sound cool without understanding what they're saying...

    You can say "in three days" or you can say "it is now T minus three days," the latter meaning "three days before launch."

  24. A few glitches in the story..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, "supersonic speed" is meaningless in this context, as there is no air near the sun.

    Not to mention that while the corona is really HOT, it's also very thin, so it's not carrying very much heat. The total energy impacting a school-bus is going to be about, mumble, not much.

  25. Findings by AshFan · · Score: 0

    $120 million experiment. Result: Its really really hot, like super hot. Just crazy hot.

    1. Re: Findings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so uterlly amazing! WOW! I sh* you not I sh* my pants over it.

  26. This is our chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know those large islands of plastic that have been forming on our planet? They could be the payload. Drop them off once the rocket is close enough. No need for harmful pollutants in our atmosphere. No need to find or make incinerators big enough. (We can use the off switch now). No need to raise the earth's temperature by burning all that trash.

  27. Time reversal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In T-minus three days, NASA will launch

    If you don't understand geek talk, don't use it. T-minus three days is _now_, with T being the launch time.

    Basically they are saying "Three days before launch time, NASA will launch"... Good grief.

  28. Re: Delta IV by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    For non-disposable spaceships it is.

  29. Re:Room Temperature? by fedos · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the lack of life support systems. He'd be dead before he got off Earth.

  30. Re:Room Temperature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be skeptical that the radiation would kill them first, heat shield or not.

  31. Easier ways to burn money by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Pardon my naivete about associating research with some kind of payoff for human beings ...

    But this is the kind of thing that inclines me to wonder if we should be ejecting our space program into the corona.

    Can you imagine dying without knowing why the sun's atmosphere is hotter than its surface? You know what? I can. I am completely OK with that.

    What could possibly be the answer that anyone would care about ... that we should have our back pocket picked by the IRS to figure out?

    1. Re:Easier ways to burn money by dwpro · · Score: 1
      Do you really think a team of extremely smart and dedicated scientists and engineers would invest much of their lives building and refining a machine if the answers they seek were simply trivia?

      Here are some of the question they are hoping to get a better answer on source:

      This is what we expect to happen with sources of heat: The farther away we are from the center of the flame, the cooler it becomes. But this doesn’t happen with the biggest, baddest fire in the solar system, our sun.

      The surface of the sun is around 10,000F; its atmosphere, the corona, is around 2 million degrees, about 200 times hotter. It’s like if an airplane took off from ground level where it was 60F, and then reached a cruising altitude where it was 12,000F. It sounds preposterous. And the plane would melt.

      Scientists call this weird phenomenon the “coronal heating” problem, and it has been stumping them for decades. In the early 1940s, scientists determined that one of the elements in the corona was a form of iron that had been stripped of 13 of its electrons, and it takes a massive amount of energy, in the form of heat, to pull electrons away from an atom of iron. But really, the mystery stretches back even further: When scientists first detected the iron in the 1860s, they mistook it for an entirely new element they dubbed “coronium.”

      The coronal heating problem is just one of three interrelated mysteries the Parker Probe will collect data on in hopes of solving.

      Another mystery is solar wind. This “wind” is composed of particles of matter being shot out from the sun’s corona in all directions. These particles get accelerated to speeds of millions of miles per hour, and no one knows exactly how. (Solar wind is why we have aurora borealis and aurora australis — the northern and southern lights — at our poles. Earth’s magnetic field deflects the wind particles to the poles, where they collide and ionize in a brilliant light show.)

      Last is the mystery of coronal mass ejections. These are the sudden explosions of plasma and particles that spew from the sun and could potentially knock out power grids on Earth. We don’t completely understand the physics of these explosions; nor can we predict when and where they will happen (and if Earth will be in the crosshairs).

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    2. Re:Easier ways to burn money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a lot happier seeing my taxes spent on this kind of pure science, which will probably have positive results that we can't predict, than seeing it wasted on an idiot like Trump and his tantrums.

    3. Re:Easier ways to burn money by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Just because it takes "a team of extremely smart and dedicated scientists and engineers" doesn't mean it is going to pay off or anyone.

      People don't know why this happens. The answer could (easily) be something that will never, never help human beings.

      I am betting it won't.

  32. Google it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Actually, the hottest part of the candle flame is the blue part, at 1670 degrees F (1400 C.) That is where the flame has the most oxygen and you are getting complete combustion. The reddish part is the coolest part, about 1070 F (800C)."

    Lets face it, we already know the answer, but the idea of sending a vehicle around the sun is kind of hot.

    Unfortunately though, considering the taxpayer $$$ going into this, I have to assume that because we already know the answer, then this must be some kind of military test.

    Kudos though, best those cheap chinese lazors won't hit 3 million degrees!

  33. Re: WHY FARENHEIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't expect much from the original article. Use of "zooming" was the giveaway.

    There's still some science amid the toddler talk. Be grateful?

  34. Re:Room Temperature? by WRX+Gav · · Score: 1

    And ... loving it

  35. Re:WHY FARENHEIT by piers_downunder · · Score: 1

    As a non-USian, I have no idea OTTOMH whether F scales within the same order of magnitude as C and K in the millions of degrees mark. Those sorts of temperatures are only used in physics, which almost exclusively uses C or K. So yeah, it would have been much easier for most of the world for TFS to have used C or K, as in my mind it could have been been the difference between 50,000 deg C or 50 million deg C.

  36. to quote Pink Floyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sn.

  37. Re:WHY FARENHEIT by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Well, from now on you can't feign ignorance!

    As an American (on a US website, BTW) I share your frustration, but if it's any consolation our engineering schooling requires being fluent in both sets of standards, which is a pain in the ass. Look up slugs as a unit of mass if you want to crawl out of your skin.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  38. Deuterium barbeque? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. The hyperbole talks about 3 million degrees of heat, and then alludes to the spacecraft entering that barbeque. I didn't think earth people had anything like 3 million degree insulation. What material would it be? The atoms are all smashed down to helium or hydrogen or deuterium, or just plain out-of-this-world boiling energy and escaping neutrinos - which would soon turn the spacecraft into helium, deurerium, hydgrogen and massive amounts of energy. Some place further out maybe the spacecraft could be lithium for a while. Talk about your shape shifting stealth craft!

    That does bring up a question. Would the shape shifting go through the entire periodic table, you physicists out there?

    But, as it turns out, per your link reference, the spacecraft will get only within about 3 million miles, and the insulation is good for 2500 degrees, which apparently will be the temperature max at that location. Boy, the power function really drops it quick. Way less hyperbolic tho ...