Slashdot Mirror


Tesla's Chief Vehicle Engineer Returns To Apple (theverge.com)

Doug Field, the former VP of Mac hardware who left Apple to become Tesla's chief vehicle engineer, has returned to Cupertino. Field is reportedly working on the company's secretive "Project Titan" self-driving car program. The Verge reports: Field ran Tesla's vehicle production and engineering, but CEO Elon Musk took over responsibility for production this year after the company failed to meet its initial first-quarter goal for the Model 3. Field then took a leave of absence in May, and subsequently left the company altogether in June. Project Titan has reportedly been scaled back considerably from its initial scope, with hundreds of people leaving the division as Apple is said to focus on seeking carmaker partners for its self-driving software. [Daring Fireball's John Gruber] speculates that Field's return to Titan suggests Apple could still have an interest in producing vehicles itself, while cautioning that employees do move between the two companies regularly.

130 comments

  1. For Whom the Bell Tolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hemingway or Metallica versions.

  2. Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So wouldnâ(TM)t put it past Apple to somehow fund Tesla going private initiative. Tesla would need a sugar daddy like Apple to go private.

    1. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unlikely, Apple are many things but they are not stupid when it comes to spending their cash. such a high risk venture at such a huge mark up in value makes no sense. Besides either Elon already has the funding like he stated or he is headed for some serious legal trouble with the SEC and investor lawsuits.

    2. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either Elon already has the funding like he stated or he is headed for some serious legal trouble with the SEC and investor lawsuits.

      I'm starting to think Elon Musk may be the tech equivalent of Donald Trump. Rich and successful but seems to say and do a lot of stupid, pointless shit that doesn't seem very well thought out.

    3. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Musk has paid his bills, hasn't been accused of screwing over contractors, and hasn't bankrupted even one company yet. Hardly comparable.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk shafted his investors to the tune of $2.8 billion when Tesla bought his shares from that failing "solar" business with their money. So, not only comparable, but actually the same level of sleaziness and used car salesmanship.

    5. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must just committed securities fraud and will be getting raped in prison.

    6. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Investors voted to take over SolarCity, with 85% of voting shareholders voting "Yes". Or was Musk using his mind control ray? It was taken over not for its loan-based solar install business (which is a dying model due to the continued declines in panel costs), but for the solar Gigafactory (Gigafactory 2) - which is what SolarCity accrued most of its debt on. It's not as far along the rampup as Gigafactory 1 (the battery / motor plant in Nevada), but I'm very much a fan of the potential of their solar roofing products, as they let you do a two-in-one install (aka installing a solar roof rather than installing a roof, then installing solar on it), and are aesthetically pleasing . Of course, the ultimate market penetration all depends on the price point they'll ultimately be able to achieve.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    7. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the potential of their solar roofing products

      What is this product you're bullshitting about, Tesla shill? Where can I buy it? Ah, it is the same thing as the famous "$35k electric car", a shiny piece of vaporware that exists only on the marketing brochures...

    8. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Rei · · Score: 1

      What is this product you're bullshitting about

      This. It's undergoing trials with early customers right now.

      Where can I buy it?

      From Tesla. Big waiting list, though, as rampup doesn't start until later this year, and will continue over next year.

      Ah, it is the same thing as the famous "$35k electric car", a shiny piece of vaporware that exists only on the marketing brochures...

      No, no, you're mixing up your short arguments! You're supposed to say that it's been scrubbed from the marketing brochures and has been cancelled! And deny all counterevidence when presented with it, including a tweet just the other day from Tesla discussing AWD availability on the SR.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    9. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reality is investors will nearly always vote for whatever the directors and board tell them to vote for unless it is obviously highly controversial, luckily for Musk he hid a lot of the financial facts and vested interests to avoid other investors knowing he was paying off relations and taking on a huge fucking lemon in exchange for it. The solar business has been an utter disaster for them. You can babble all you like about products that never came to market, that doesn't change the realities of that lemon.

    10. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's undergoing trials with early customers right now.

      Prototype is not a product.

      as rampup

      Oh, I see, they'll be available after a "ramp-up". Like the other unavailable Tesla products.

      Now, there's an excuse I have not heard from a Tesla fan in a long time.

      A long time.

      You're really out of talking points.

    11. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, you're mixing up your short arguments! You're supposed to say

      Well, I'm really sorry that I don't conform to what is expected of me as a "short", and that I'm giving you so much trouble with adapting your talking points.

      Accept my apologies for making you work too hard, oh unknown troll house employee.

    12. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Except for the Tesla contractors going unpaid?

    13. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The SolarCity takeover was clearly a scam to bail out Musk and his cousins who had money invested in the company. He spent billions on something that is totally worthless to save their own skins, effectively using Tesla shareholders money as his own personal piggy bank.

      Why are you flooding this thread with post after post defending Musk? Are you his mum?

    14. Re:Could Apple fund Tesla going private? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump may be rich, but he isn't successful at running businesses. If he had simply invested the wealth he inherited from his father he would be richer than he is now.

  3. Apple and Silly Valley's revolving door. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least at the top.

    I've heard that among the rank and file, if you leave, Apple won't ever hire you back.

    1. Re:Apple and Silly Valley's revolving door. by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      At least at the top.

      I've heard that among the rank and file, if you leave, Apple won't ever hire you back.

      Many companies are like that. I work far, far away from Silly Valley, and where I work it's pretty well known that if you leave, for any reason, you'll never be allowed to come back.

    2. Re:Apple and Silly Valley's revolving door. by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

      That depends. If you're a worker-bee, then yeah. OTOH, if you're a super hot-shot type, wwweeellll, the rules can be bent, right? Duh!

    3. Re:Apple and Silly Valley's revolving door. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true, but when you are literally the top of the top in your field, the CEO will suck your dick to get you back.

    4. Re:Apple and Silly Valley's revolving door. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you work for Peter Thiel, then. What do you do, toss his salad, or play his trombone?

    5. Re:Apple and Silly Valley's revolving door. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it's pretty well known that if you leave, for any reason, you'll never be allowed to come back.

      That is a foolish policy. My company keeps in touch with alumni, and we invite them to our annual picnic. We have rehired several "boomerangs", with good results every time. They already know our culture and procedures, so they can hit the ground running, without the typical 3-6 month learning curve. We also already know their capabilities, so we can put them into a team where they fit. They come back brimming with new ideas about how to fix our products and processes, and they have learned that the grass isn't greener elsewhere, so they rarely leave a second time.

      What possible justification is there for a "no rehire" policy? Do they really think it will dissuade people from quitting?

    6. Re:Apple and Silly Valley's revolving door. by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Yep pretty much this, I currently work for one of those large multi national tech firms. The policy is if you quit you are pretty much walked out the door on the spot but they will welcome you back with open arms. I have many friends who have left and returned.

  4. Tesla Dieing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Hate to be sucking on air when Tesla stock NOSEDIVESSSZZZ! Sell while you can!

    1. Re:Tesla Dieing by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I can't hear you from all the way up here atop this pile of money.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    2. Re: Tesla Dieing by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      'Rei' comments have started to become a little shrill and shrieky. Just a little.

      Take note of this, everybody.

    3. Re: Tesla Dieing by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Tesla is basically propped up entirely by blind fanboyism. No other car company has 'fans' who will pay money for a car and then accept it covered in dirt, scratches, panel gaps and fucked-up paint.

  5. sounds like he spied for apple by renegade600 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    wonder if he went to tesla just to gather info then report back to apple.

    1. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only info he could get from Tesla is what’s the most retardedly stupid way to built a car.

    2. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean gave Tesla Apple IP, and then jumped ship when Musk went crazy but before Musk cracks and shoots everybody he can get to.

    3. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "wonder if he went to tesla just to gather info then report back to apple"

      "The only info he could get from Tesla is what’s the most retardedly stupid way to built a car."

      Considering he worked at Tesla for 4 years, that retardation must be contagious if he needed that long to figure it out.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    4. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he studied with a true master, so there was a lot to learn. See, he missed the most important lesson - TO NEVER GO FULL RETARD.

      Grimes's boyfriend pulled that one just last week.

    5. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "Well, he studied with a true master, so there was a lot to learn. See, he missed the most important lesson - TO NEVER GO FULL RETARD."

      Could have learned that from the Jobs' cancer regimen.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs actually delivered. The most Musk can do is waste money and jerk off on twitter.

    7. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Rei · · Score: 2

      4 years is actually a pretty reasonable length of time as an executive in a company these days. Particularly in a silicon valley growth company.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    8. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and several key product development people leaving the sinking ship is also pretty typical -- of failing startups.

      Too bad fuckedcompany.com is gone, it would have had a very amusing section on Tesla.

    9. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Rei · · Score: 1
      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    10. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't care about rationalizations from con artists who peddle feel-good marketing shit to patients with Tesla Derangement Syndrome.

    11. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Jobs actually delivered. The most Musk can do is waste money and jerk off on twitter.

      Jobs delivered wankery and gold cases. Musk's delivered rockets that land and the most desirable EVs ever produced.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs delivered value. Musk delivers a lot of bullshit sprouting out of his mouth and low quality tech he got from the government on the cheap.

    13. Re:sounds like he spied for apple by samwichse · · Score: 1

      You sound very convincing, like your words are rational and well thought out.

      Your posting has been very effective and not self-defeating at all.

      Keep up the good work!

    14. Re: sounds like he spied for apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go buy a lollipop from teslarati.com if that will make it easier for you to swallow.

      It is only $35, and buying two thousands of them will move you up 3 places in the Model 3 waiting list.

      And they taste great.

  6. Re:Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does someone who was "VP of Mac hardware" at Apple, become the head of "vehicle production and engineering" at Tesla? How in the fucking fuck is that even possible? Maybe I am extremely naive, but I would expect Tesla to hire someone with, you know, extensive automotive experience.

  7. Re:Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple Car®

    Essentially the same as a Telsa, but costs twice as much and nothing can be repaired or replaced because everything is soldered in place.

  8. Re:Use Crisco in Sodomy. by haruchai · · Score: 4, Informative

    "How does someone who was "VP of Mac hardware" at Apple, become the head of "vehicle production and engineering" at Tesla? How in the fucking fuck is that even possible? Maybe I am extremely naive, but I would expect Tesla to hire someone with, you know, extensive automotive experience"

    He worked for 6 yrs at Ford as a Dev Eng right after after getting his Mech Eng degree from Purdue

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  9. Re:Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk will be experiencing sodomy first hand when he drops the soap in prison. Better come up with that money Elon.

  10. Apple cars, really? by berchca · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe now that Doug is back at Apple, he should work on "Secret Project Working Keyboard".

    1. Re:Apple cars, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or maybe not. Apple users don't type, they just pour their artistic minds into the iProduct.

    2. Re:Apple cars, really? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Funny

      He is too busy working on replacing the steering wheel with a touch bar.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Apple cars, really? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So the keyboards should be able to withstand "intellectual fluids" as well.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  11. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, a junior car talent at best.

    Small wonder Tesla cannot get a grip on its "production hell".

  12. 420, man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, like, just works, dude. So awesome.

  13. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    Small wonder Tesla cannot get a grip on its "production hell".

    OTOH, they are not held back by ossified traditional thinking.

  14. Musk is the little brother of Donald, but he's no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "tech", just a junk stock scammer.

    Remember what his shills sang last week?

    "The shorts will pay".

    Remember what Trump said about that "wall"?

    "Mexico's gonna pay".

    Yep, it is that bad.

  15. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Apparently they are not held back by the "traditional sales model", where you get what you pay for. The Tesla forum admins can't keep up deleting posts that say "Tesla took my money, didn't deliver the car". Moreover, they're apparently done with tradition in customer service. Because all these desperate comments from fans now end in "And after that, they don't return my calls".

    https://forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/warning-dont-pay-your-tesla-electronic-funds-transfer-delivery

    Sad.

  16. Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was beginning to miss the five musk-sucking threads by BeauHD and Rei a week. CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT TESLA DISCUSSIONS.

    Rei, Beau, STRENGTHEN MY FAITH!

    Tell me all that stock I bought isn't going to be just worthless paper after Musk goes to jail.

    Please!

    1. Re: Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol musk going to jail. What is this bitter fever dream.

    2. Re:Just in time, too. by Rei · · Score: 1

      I was beginning to miss the five musk-sucking threads by BeauHD and Rei a week.

      <feminist rant>

      Why is it that "oral sex on a man" is a standard throw-around insult? When was the last time that you saw a man who was supportive of a woman being accused of "eating her out"? Rarely, if ever. Yet the opposite situation is a generic throwaway insult here. Why is it that male sexuality isn't seen as insulting at all, but female sexuality is supposed to be some sort of mark of shame?

      If we have a situation where someone says something powerful about a powerful woman - say, from past US elections, Hillary Clinton - is the allegation that they want to have oral sex with her? No, just the opposite. Powerful women are presented as cold and sexless, and their supporters, henpecked. It's only when you have powerful men that they're painted as virile and their supporters - overwhelmingly with their female supporters - sleeping with them. Again: male sexuality is seen as normal and natural (the shame is to not be sexual), while female sexuality is presented as shameful, as an insult. Men aren't presumed to be exchanging sex for favour from powerful individuals, while women are automatically presumed to be doing so in relation to powerful men.

      The funny thing is, you probably think you're being offensive, when all you do is flag yourself as a troglodyte.

      </feminist rant>

      Apart from that: sorry you lost your money betting against / shorting TSLA ($355,49). Better luck next time. ;)

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    3. Re:Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry you lost your money betting against / shorting TSLA ($355,49).

      This "sorry you lost money" thing is getting old, try something new. BTW, why is TSLA($355.49) is so low, if Musk had any credibility, it should be hovering around $400 now.

    4. Re: Just in time, too. by Rei · · Score: 1

      "Help, SEC, save me from my losses!" is always the final Hail Mary of a short seller. Every time.

      And it's almost always a fumble.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    5. Re: Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The short sellers don't need to beg SEC for help. The stock is back to where it was before the price manipulation attempt from last week, and the so-called "losses" and "squeezes" have been largely recovered. If anything, Tesla is even more shorted today, which speaks volumes of the credibility of Musk.

      If there is someone who has to worry about SEC and beg them, it ain't a Tesla short. It is the man himself.

    6. Re: Just in time, too. by Rei · · Score: 1

      price manipulation attempt from last week,

      To repeat: "Help, SEC, save me from my losses!"

      and the so-called "losses" and "squeezes" have been largely recovered.

      Perhaps you're looking at a different TSLA than me. Because in the reality I exist in, TSLA was under $300 just a couple weeks ago.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    7. Re:Just in time, too. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Lol, shorts now thinking Tesla should be worth more money? Now I've seen everything.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    8. Re:Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rei, dear resident Tesla troll, you seem to be confusing the sex between partners in a relationship you've heard about with the services you perform on people for money.

      Let me assure you, one is not at all like the other.

      Oh, and cut the "I'm a woman" crap, we know the only woman you've ever been close to is your mother. Upstairs.

    9. Re: Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To repeat: "Help, SEC, save me from my losses!"

      Lathe, rinse, repeat. It will work just as well as any other mantra ;)

      Perhaps you're looking at a different TSLA than me.

      Perhaps.

      Because in the reality I exist in

      I know nothing about the reality of fake Internet personae, what color is the sky in your VR, green?

    10. Re:Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, you don't know how these things work.

      If there is an idiot willing to pay $420 a share, yeah, the shares should reflect that. And they don't.

      But I give you an extra point for nice try to skirt around the obvious, Musk's utter lack of credibility.

    11. Re: Just in time, too. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Come to the wired.
      God is here.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    12. Re:Just in time, too. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Shorts refusing to believe Musk and shorting the stock on positive announcements isn't "news".
      Them repeatedly losing their shirts doing so also isn't news.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    13. Re: Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There ain't no gods, Rei, Musk is just a man, no matter what he told you in your dream. Grow up, get some help or both.

    14. Re:Just in time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should anyone believe Musk, Rei? He's talking shit out of his ass all the time. He promised 500k cars this year, which his company cannot deliver. He promised cars at a price of $35k this year, which aren't available. He promised sustained 5k cars/week two months ago, and it ain't happening. He overpromises and underdelivers all the time.

      He's a con man, just like your other business favorite, Mr. Trump.

    15. Re: Just in time, too. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      No matter what your comment, Rei will roll in it. Like a stray dog who encounters a dead festering muskrat rolls in it.

  17. SHORT SQUEEZE1!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teh shorts are gonna BURN.

    Burn, burn, burn.

    1. Re:SHORT SQUEEZE1!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope Elon’s butt is gonna burn when he’s someone’s bitch in prison.

  18. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big mistake on Musks side to hire this guy and prettty arrogant of Fields to take the job. Typical Silicon Valley attitude of âoeweâ(TM)re smarter because we do computer stuffâ. Car production has been solved already by industrial and mechanical engineers.

  19. Predictable Reaction to News by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, the big news today is that Tesla lost one employee! One who worked as an executive for four years, and managed the people who really designed the car. For someone like that to hold a job for only four years isn't unusual.

    This is met with a lot of totally unsubstantiated "Tesla will crash", "It's a really bad car", "Musk is going to jail". The shorts are still out there, or just trolls.

    As far as I can tell, lots of people want their cars, their home solar products, their industrial battery products, etc.

    I agree that Musk was probably just teasing the shorts. But Musk can say he's considering any thing he wants. And although it would be the largest stock buy-out ever, on paper, consider that the actual buying out is only for the people who decide to sell - while many would hang on - and he probably is able to line up the financing to handle a reasonable estimate of how many investors would sell out.

    Lots of companies go private, public again, and private again. It's more common these days, with more private money in the market. And right now, being public is a distraction for Tesla. Too much energy spent fighting FUD.

    1. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      I agree that Musk was probably just teasing the shorts. But Musk can say he's considering any thing he wants.

      Maybe. But what he can't say is "funding secured" if it isn't.

    2. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except must lied about securing funding. I hope he enjoys getting gang rapped in prison.

    3. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funding secured" is a rather bold and specific thing to say, I rather think that it will turn out to be true [enough] that Musk won't be in any trouble at all. The SEC 8K thing is easily dodged; he did say he's considering it. It's not like it's common practice to file paperwork on things you're still considering, especially if you can come up with a hundred permutations on how you're thinking of doing it. So it's all all about whether someone with money has agreed to terms. Likely saudi money but maybe a combo of some other sovereign funds, and the fact that it happened just after good news (well most people saw it as good news) came out suggests it was conditional on that. What all the cost projections (absent from the linked article, but readily found in most stories) ignore is that it sounds like Musk would try to structure the shareholder vote so that 'no' votes don't become [private] owners of the new company, but 'yes' voters do. So suddenly the saudi buyer doesn't need to buy 100% of the company, doesn't need to buy 78% of the company (since Musk's shares all vote Yes), doesn't even need to buy 49% of the company (because tesla votes don't require 51%, they require 66%), but actually require buying at most 34% of the company, and "contingent on shareholder vote", by definition, provides at least 66% yes votes.

      I don't find it at all hard to believe Musk knows people willing to make that sort of investment, especially right after Musk was able to beat expectations even while withholding 13000 cars from sale just to make sure he didn't hit the phaseout of the tax credits.

    4. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true "enough" is not good enough when making market affecting statements, he either has the money secured or he doesn't, especially when you even provide a price it has been secured at. If he doesn't then he is up shit creek as even if the SEC don't go him he will be reamed in court for losses by various investors.

    5. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, Musk didn't beat expectations, He missed, but did not miss by as much as what many people suspected he would.

    6. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why people keep bringing up the SEC 8-K thing. It wouldn't be not due yet regardless. Regulations are for it to be filed within four business days after a material announcement - aka by the end of the day on Monday.

      And yes, there's no shortage of possible candidates. Just some various examples:

        * The Saudi sovereign wealth fund (recently bought 3-5% of the company on the open market)
        * Softbank (was trying to buy the company last year, but negotiations broke down because Musk didn't want them to have as much control as they wanted)
        * The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund (companies like Tesla are right up their alley, and Norway has the highest per-capita ownership of Teslas in the world)
        * China (various) (lately seems to throw money at pretty much anything that moves, particularly if it has a plug, and it was already announced that Tesla was working with local Chinese investors concerning Gigafactory 3)
        * Apple (has more cash today than they seemingly know what to do with, and we've seen a drumbeat of analysts over the past year opining "Apple should buy Tesla")
        * Alphabet (same situation, and Musk is good friends with Larry Page; Google had previously wanted to buy Tesla, but Tesla ultimately turned them down when they raised the money elsewhere)

      One possibility that I'd moot is Facebook/Zuckerberg. Not just because they just lost a ton of value, but also because Musk and Zuck don't like each other.

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    7. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a nice piece of fantasy story-telling, but it is just that.

      Softbank was not trying to buy Tesla, not last year, not last month.
      There is not even speculation of indication of interest from Apple.
      Google did not buy Tesla when it was allegedly offered to them for $5G, it ain't paying 10x that today.
      The Saudis already indicated that they're not interested in holding more than what they already bought, and
      The rest of your rant is not even a speculation, just deranged outburst of wishful thinking, like a Musk tweet.

      Pathetic, really.

    8. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Rei · · Score: 1

      Softbank was not trying to buy Tesla, not last year, not last month.

      Hate to break it to you...

      There is not even speculation of indication of interest from Apple.

      Yeah, keep telling yourself that.

      Google did not buy Tesla when it was allegedly offered to them for $5G, it ain't paying 10x that today.

      It was precisely the other way around. Musk terminated the deal when Tesla had its first profitable quarter and no longer needed the cash. And it was for $6B at an $11B valuation, and that was when Tesla was a far smaller company.

      The Saudis already indicated that they're not interested in holding more than what they already bought

      Ref?

      The rest of your rant is not even a speculation

      For the record, what about "the rest" (written below) do you find "deranged"?

          * The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund (companies like Tesla are right up their alley, and Norway has the highest per-capita ownership of Teslas in the world)
          * China (various) (lately seems to throw money at pretty much anything that moves, particularly if it has a plug, and it was already announced that Tesla was working with local Chinese investors concerning Gigafactory 3)

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    9. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break it to you... [businessinsider.com]

      Yeah, I utterly believe anonymous sources who "confirm" talks about "taking tesla private" two days after Musk speculates about that on Twitter. Show me a news item from last year, and I'll believe it.

      It was precisely the other way around [time.com].

      I wasn't there, but from what I've read Musk was desperate, offered himself, had a deal drafted ... and was not bought. Eventually, he found money from other fools. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/apr/21/google-almost-bought-tesla-elon-musk-larry-page

      Yeah, keep telling yourself that. [google.is]

      All I see in this google search is a bunch of headlines from various people totally unconnected to Apple saying "Apple can buy Tesla". Of course Apple can buy Tesla, the operative meaning being "have the ability". Apple have money to buy Musk with all his junk several times over. But where is the indication of interest?

      Oh, our darling Rei is again doing his best, making strawmen and defeating them...

      Ref?

      Bloomberg from a few days ago, I'm sure you're capable enough to google it. I'm not as motivated as you to dig for links.

      , what about "the rest" (written below) do you find "deranged"?

      The idea that "if some people have money, they'd pour it into a money-losing proposition" is deranged.

      Thanks for playing ;)

    10. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I utterly believe anonymous sources who "confirm" talks about "taking tesla private"...

      Oh, so Bloomberg is in on the conspiracy now too! Where does this stop - are the Illuminati trying to help Musk as well?

      from what I've read Musk was desperate, offered himself, had a deal drafted ... and was not bought. Eventually, he found money from other fools. https://www.theguardian.com/te...

      Your article says literally the opposite of what you claim: "Musk broke off talks and the company has gone from strength to strength since, later launching in Europe, the UK and Australia."

      All I see in this google search is a bunch of headlines from various people totally unconnected to Apple saying "Apple can buy Tesla".

      No, saying Apple should buy Tesla. And I'll repeat the original claim, which you pooh-poohed: "Apple (has more cash today than they seemingly know what to do with, and we've seen a drumbeat of analysts over the past year opining "Apple should buy Tesla")"

      Bloomberg from a few days ago, I'm sure you're capable enough to google it

      1) Oh, so now Bloomberg is trustworthy? ;)
      2) I did google it and came up blank. So let me repeat myself: Ref?

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    11. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so Bloomberg is in on the conspiracy now too!

      No, they write what they hear. However, it is hard to believe a "source", which came out with news from yesteryear at such a convenient time.

      Your article says literally the opposite of what you claim

      You obviously have a problem with reading. My article says exactly this:
      A deal was written. Musk demanded ... various things... A couple of sticking points apparently held the deal long enough for Tesla’s car sales to pick up rapidly and the factory was restarted.

      In other words, it says pretty much what I said. Musk was begging, he wasn't bought because he offered a deal that wasn't good enough, and then his fortune improved. Bottom line: hard to believe that what Google chose not to buy at that price it will buy at 10x the price today.

      No, saying Apple should buy Tesla.

      Same shit, no indication of Apple interest. Thanks for the new strawman.

      Oh, so now Bloomberg is trustworthy

      Bloomberg is reporting what they hear. Some claims are timely and believable. Others, not so much.

      and came up blank.

      Of course you did. You have an amazing skill to not see what you don't like, as someone already observed upthread.

    12. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAAL.

      You CANNOT post these sorts of things WITHOUT backing. There's no "considering" this. There will be repercussions.

    13. Re:Predictable Reaction to News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One possibility that I'd moot is Facebook/Zuckerberg. Not just because they just lost a ton of value, but also because Musk and Zuck don't like each other.

      That word does not mean what you think it means

  20. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't gerit, man, this ain't no regular car. This is ELECTRIC car, it runs on electricitay. So, totally like a webserver.

    420!

  21. Fucking Musk shills, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop lying? While it may sound grand on /. it rarely works in real life.

    It is not just one employee, Bruce. Quite a few people in senior engineering positions left Tesla in the past half year. These are people who actually lead the lemmings, including Grimes's boyfriend, towards the light. And it speaks volumes that the replacements we know of are from the lemmings group.

    Also, there is no indication Tesla is "going private". No "investor" has stepped forward to confirm Musk's ravings, the board doesn't know who'll pay the bill, there are no banks and lawyers working on a deal, the Musk promise to have a buyout without shafting current holders is a business and legal impossibility. It was a stupid attempt to manipulate the stock price by a desperate failure of a manager.

    How desperate a failure? Taking people's money and not delivering their cars level desperate:

    https://forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/warning-dont-pay-your-tesla-electronic-funds-transfer-delivery

    1. Re: Fucking Musk shills, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Constantly reposting the same crap makes *you* the shill, not others.

    2. Re: Fucking Musk shills, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about the butthurt that those pesky Tesla facts are causing you, Rei.

      Have you gotten your VIN yet?

    3. Re: Fucking Musk shills, won't you by Rei · · Score: 1

      I love how I'm apparently everyone, everywhere. It's neat being omnipresent. ;)

      BTW, did you mix up your short theses? The short thesis that's in vogue today is "there's no demand", not "Tesla can't produce". ;) So you should be assuming I got my VIN and that there's nobody left on the list. Despite them not having opened up anywhere outside the US, and with no signs of them doing so any time soon.

      Or I guess you could buck the trend and keep insisting on the "Tesla can't produce" short-selling hypothesis. I guess Bloomberg is in on the scam.

      Maybe you could push your own hypotheses? Beat the curve and go straight to the competition hypothesis - "They can produce and there is demand, but soon they'll be drown in a wave of competition!" That one comes into vogue every few years and is usually quite stylish. Or you could go all Alex Jones and become a margin-denier.

      There's so many ways for a short to dress!

      --
      Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
    4. Re: Fucking Musk shills, won't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have a bad case of Shorts Derangement Syndrome, take a break before it breaks you.

    5. Re: Fucking Musk shills, won't you by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Keep that blue dress wrapped up and in the back of your closet. It protects the dna 'just in case' you ever start calling him 'the big creep.'

  22. Re:Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever isn't soldered will be glued. The car will not contain any standard fasteners, and you will be lucky if there are any screws at all. It will also feature typical Apple "It Just Works" (ie. most of the time, or sometimes, or maybe just not at all); it often won't be usable as a car, but it will look great by a parking meter or in your garage. Missing functionality (like charging, keys, or seat belts) will be provided with dongles at an extra cost.

    After the generous one year warranty expires, you can have it crushed in an Apple Car recycling facility, for which they will give you a credit to help purchase the new, thinner, even less functional model.

  23. He's back to Apple by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Did he forget something?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  24. Re:Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, just like Tesla Motors today.

  25. non compete clause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come he does not have non competitive clause in his contract?
    How come some programmer grunt have such clause in his contract and this high level specialist does not?

    Double standard world...

    1. Re:non compete clause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you have more influence over your contracts if you have real skills, as opposed to being a code monkey without even a slashdot account.

    2. Re: non compete clause by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Thank you, HR shill.

    3. Re: non compete clause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wellcomed.

  26. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Rei · · Score: 1

    The Tesla forum admins can't keep up deleting posts that say "Tesla took my money, didn't deliver the car".

    There are two other Tesla forums (Model 3 Owners Club and Tesla Motors Club) unconnected to Tesla itself, and I've never seen a post like that on either. Furthermore, your single example is a post on the Tesla forums that is most notable for not being deleted in any way, shape or form, despite being written way back in May. FYI: "Fcos154" only ever showed up at the forum to write this one thread (and a couple posts in it), then disappeared.

    Do you FUDsters ever stop?

    Of course there "have been" people with damage in transit. Because that happens to every manufacturer; they all use the same transport companies. Half a percent or so of vehicles receiving damage (usually minor, such as minor scratches or paint chips) in transit is normal. With a dealership model, customers never see this; the paint is corrected before the car goes on the lot. With Tesla, it either means a frustrating delay from their scheduled delivery date/time, or presenting them with a less-than-perfect car which they have to bring back. That said, the reaction to the vehicle, and overall impressions of Tesla, have been extremely positive.

    --
    Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
  27. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    That guy was pretty unlucky it seems, if his story is true. Usually they deliver the car with a load of defects, but you do get a car.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  28. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I've never seen a post like that on either.

    Yes, Rei, we know that your eyes are covered with Musk cum, so you don't see what you don't want to see.

    Do you FUDsters ever stop?

    What is FUD, that Tesla is stalling deliveries/refunds and making excuses from the same playbook? This is fraud, pure and simple.

  29. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several threads like this, with a few #metoo-s in them. So it isn't as rosy a picture as the Tesla shills, who claim "one isolated accident", are painting.

    And these are not only the Model 3-s, but the pricey variants, too. Tesla is shaping up as a complete fail - from manufacturing to customer service.

    Muskey inferno.

  30. Re:Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How does someone who was "VP of Mac hardware" at Apple, become the head of "vehicle production and engineering" at Tesla?

    How does someone go from being a sleazy multi-bankrupt real estate peddler to President of the United States?

  31. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Rei · · Score: 1

    Funny how this "complete fail" company keeps earning the highest customer satisfaction rating in the industry, huh?

    Funny all of the people on the forums and YouTube who can't shut up about how much they love their car.

    Funny the results of the ownership survey.

    Guess it's a mass delusion.

    --
    Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
  32. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's no "ownership survey", Rei, that's members of a circle jerk playing games.

  33. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its completely logical that Apple would just buy a stake in Tesla. That is probably what Musk is tweeting about.

  34. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    Whataboutism.

  35. What planet are you on,Perrens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is met with a lot of totally unsubstantiated "Tesla will crash", "It's a really bad car", "Musk is going to jail". The shorts are still out there, or just trolls.

    Never ever seen anything like that. It's all in your head.

    At 62, you may be suffering from early Alzheimer's. I would get screened.

  36. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 of the 100 posts on this page are from "Rei".

    Got a horse in this race, Bro?

  37. Musk Sued for 100s of Millions = NO HEADLINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. sure has Elon's cock jammed down their collective throat while his fingers are busily pussy grabbing all they can. SAD.

  38. Re: Elon will free those kids.. in 6 weeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PEDO.

  39. Good for you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great you made out.

    Musk insisted that he wouldn't need another cash infusion, but low and behold, he got that 2 billion from the Saudis. The "shorts" knew it and said so, but they were dismissed as "trolls" and "stock manipulators" - which is laughable considering the way the stock has been moving.

    See, here's a house analogy of where Tesla was on June 30, 2018:

    Imagine having $200 in the bank, a $1500 paycheck coming in at the end of the month and a $2,000 mortgage due now.
    What do'ya do?

    It doesn't matter that you have $100,000 in equity. You got to pay the bank.

    Go to you favorite investing site and learn about the "current ratio" and other solvency tests. Because after you flamed me days ago, it's obvious you don't understand those things. And Musk is an unreliable source. (Where are those 500,000 cars he was gonna make this year?)

    Over the last 40 years, I have seen this scenario play out time and time again. Every couple of decades there's a high profile entrepreneur that gets everybody's imagination going and hopes up and they never meet expectations. Steve Jobs stumbled pretty damn hard a couple of times.

    Musk is rapidly losing credibility among knowledgeable investors. This last stunt raised a lot of eyebrows - including the SEC's.
    And if he loses the confidence of the big players( Fidelity and the other funds that are in Tesla), you will see the stock price crash.

    And as far as the buyout is concerned, no one has heard anything. If Musk was telling the truth, my best guess is the Chinese. It's gonna have to be a sovereign wealth fund of some sort to pony up the tens of billions needed.

  40. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how this "complete fail" company keeps earning the highest customer satisfaction rating in the industry, huh?

    You "keeps" refer/infer to Consumer Reports "subscriber/owner" survey, which is easily corruptible bullshit that any loser (KarenRei, Karen Pease, WindBourne, haruchai, Bruce Perens, Type44Q, KS Kyosuke, barsteward, apoc.famine, sfcat, aaarrrgggh, bgarcia, MachineShedFred, hyades1...), any Musk cocksucking barsteward(not the username already mentioned) can sign up and claim to be a owner.

    But I am impressed that the Tesla Model 3 is garnering praise comparable to Kia automobiles of the 1990s (fast forward to 6:55).
    By 2038, Tesla can surely achieve Kia quality level we see today in 2018.
    This is assuming Elon doesn't lose any of his great design and manufacturing "talents" after all the ass rapes he'll be spoiled with in prison.
    Coincidently, 2038 is also the estimated launch date of the $35k Model 3.

  41. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is where Musk goes off the rails. Their secret sauce is in the batteries. Everything else has been done before. He has to stop trying to reinvent everything like car production and get these cars out. Global warming is real and we need this technology!

  42. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What batteries, his batteries are made by Panasonic.

  43. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by haruchai · · Score: 1

    "Tesla is stalling deliveries/refunds"
    I do think they are but it's all about the Fed tax credit and cash hoarding until they can open up the delivery floodgates to the end of the year.

    If they can average 4500 / wk over H2 2018, that's 117k Model 3s plus whatever number of S & X they can hawk, let's say 40k combined.

    With an ASP of $55k for Model 3 and $90k for S/X, that $10 Billion in gross automotive revenue for 6 months compared to $11.8B total revenue for all 2017.

    I know Tesla is claiming over 5k per week Model 3 and 2k S&X but I don't consider the latter number sustainable throughout the rest of the year and their Model 3 guidance for Q3 was 50-55k which is only 3.8-4.2k per week

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  44. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it has nothing to do with tax credits and everything to do with inability to deliver a vehicle that will stand even cursory quality inspection, compounded by totally inadequate customer service system.

    Which happens because of the peacemeal and reactive approach to problems by Tesla, something the car business overcame in the late 80s.

    That is, this is happening because Musk and his team are incompetent and occupying themselves with PR and stock fraud, and not automobile production.

  45. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Rei · · Score: 1

    You "keeps" refer/infer to Consumer Reports "subscriber/owner" survey, which is easily corruptible bullshit that any loser

    It's funny how you guys only criticize Consumer Reports' work when it says something you don't like. If anonymous surveys aren't good enough for you, then what exactly is?

    But I am impressed that the Tesla Model 3 is garnering praise comparable to Kia automobiles of the 1990s (fast forward to 6:55).

    Hahaha... your source is Randy Munro? Um, you might want to look at what Munro has been saying recently about the Model 3. It's a "symphony of engineering", he has to "eat crow", etc, etc. He now goes on and on about its brilliant design decisions, about how the guy who designed the suspension should be a Formula 1 prince, and on and on.

    --
    Assuming ethanol comes from murdered children and the hydrogen from magic, hydrogen saves 132% more lives than ethanol.
  46. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anonymous surveys aren't good enough for you, then what exactly is?

    Sorry to hear that you got duped buying that 3 inch penis enlarger for Elon off amazon reviews (not that Elon is going to have any need for his tiny penis while being ass raped in prison).

    Sandy Munro

    Too bad Munro doubled down on the shit-tier mechanical design and assembly of Model3 ("(body) it's too heavy and it costs too much money" (1:03:25)), while the Chevy Bolt chassis "is a good example of a well done body".

    The stuffs Munro thought well done were the electronics apparently made by Nvidia (31:05)(yeah, the good stuff is NOT made by Tesla).

    about how the guy who designed the suspension should be a Formula 1 prince

    Have a look at 44:55...stamped steel upper control arm with zip tie on vibration damper?
    A fucking Honda Accord uses superior drop forged steel control arm.

  47. loin the illuminati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good news!!! Good news!!!, Do you want to live a rich,healthy and famous life. Do you want to get rich immediately and be out of suffering? Do you want the world to recognize you and listen to you when you speak? do you want to be in power and control? if yes, here is a good tip just join the “ILLUMINATI ORGANISATION”, you may ask “How Can I Join” , the answer is simple all you have to do is to contact us Call/Whatsapp: ELEVATE YOURSELF FROM POVERTY..

    Do not hesitate to contact us but we don’t accept mobile calls you can only contact us through the below listed means of contacting us if you wanna be our member..

    Call/Whatsapp: +2348163807836
    Email : illuminatitemple391@gmail.com

  48. It's the brand new Icar! by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Hurry, line up for the new Icar. You know you're having a fit to own one already. We'll pack it with technology that's a least 3 years old and say it's the first. We'll price it way beyond were it should be and forget about working on it! We have the hood and the other parts welded shut so you can't get to them. You have to have one of our big fucking car disassemblers using our specially designed bolts to separate that sucker. Only we can do it.

    Now who will be the first with their $100,000 deposit.

  49. Re: Use Crisco in Sodomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that you've learned a term, the next step is to understand it. It's was obviously an example of some other unexpected and unlikely career change. Whataboutism is an attempt to deflect criticism. Not applicable here.