Slashdot Mirror
Low-Carb Diets Could Shorten Life, Study Suggests (bbc.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: In the study, published in The Lancet Public Health, 15,400 people from the U.S. filled out questionnaires on the food and drink they consumed, along with portion sizes. From this, scientists estimated the proportion of calories they got from carbohydrates, fats, and protein. After following the group for an average of 25 years, researchers found that those who got 50-55% of their energy from carbohydrates (the moderate carb group) had a slightly lower risk of death compared with the low and high-carb groups. Researchers estimated that, from the age of 50, people in the moderate carb group were on average expected to live for another 33 years. This was: four years more than people who got 30% or less of their energy from carbs (extra-low-carb group); 2.3 years more than the 30%-40% (low-carb) group; and 1.1 years more than the 65% or more (high-carb) group.
The scientists then compared low-carb diets rich in animal proteins and fats with those that contained lots of plant-based protein and fat. They found that eating more beef, lamb, pork, chicken and cheese in place of carbs was linked with a slightly increased risk of death. But replacing carbohydrates with more plant-based proteins and fats, such as legumes and nuts, was actually found to slightly reduce the risk of mortality.
The scientists then compared low-carb diets rich in animal proteins and fats with those that contained lots of plant-based protein and fat. They found that eating more beef, lamb, pork, chicken and cheese in place of carbs was linked with a slightly increased risk of death. But replacing carbohydrates with more plant-based proteins and fats, such as legumes and nuts, was actually found to slightly reduce the risk of mortality.
Yeah, eat high carb foods, you risk getting type 2 diabetes, then you lose your legs and die at a young age. If you eat less carbs and die at a young age are there side effects?
Almost everyone I know who eats low carb does so for a reason. They are fat, prone to be fat, diabetic, celiacs, or some other health problem that made them switch to low carb in the first place. Otherwise healthy people generally don't choose low carb without a health problem first.
Eat 50% carbs and get your protein & fat from nuts & beans. You will gain 1-4 years on your life... if you make it past 50.
We couldn't add a sentence or two about their samples exercise level to get more concrete answers?
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wi...
Butter is good. Low carb leaves a lot of parameter space for what are you replacing it with. At the end of the day you pick a caloric intake and you pick a method of filling it. Turning down the mid range doesn't say what you did with the treble, base and volume knobs.
Here's the thing. If you lower your carbs and 2 years later your whole body still feels great then whatever you did probably was the right thing. I'm not saying eat what makes you happy. Because if you do that, and happy is pancakes, then 2 years from now you won't feel healthy or happy about how you feel when you aren't eating pancakes.. Unless maybe you are a kid.
You body doesn't have sense on a meal by meal basis but it lets you know you are not eating well overall.
SO no frigging way are the people on low carb diets long term and likeing how they feel doing damage.
On the other hand low carb diets could be bad ideas if for example you stay on the atkins diet or something equivalently stupid. Atkins is better than being obese but once you shed that, get off it man!
The thig about low carbs is that for some people it's incredibly easy. Once you stop using sugar you just lose the desire for it. it's not punishment. And that's the magic of low carbs. It's one of the few "diets" that doesn't lead to yo-yo. At least not for a subset fo people. It's sustainable.
It isn't for every one. But for some folks it is an easy way to feel good over the long term. That can't be unhealthy.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Self-reported dietary information is unreliable. Even more so when you play statistical games to extrapolate barely significant results from it.
Regardless of what you think about low-carb diets, this study adds nothing to the debate.
Why do we keep covering these obvious causation vs correlation studies. Heck this one looks like it was crafted in reverse just to tarnish low carb diets. They get 2 minute blurbs on news stations and you never hear from them again. Ridiculous.
If you cut all pasta, bread and cakes out of your diet, you won't actually die younger. You'll just wish you would.
You are welcome on my lawn.
No desserts. No sweets. No potatoes. No rice. No bread. No pasta. âoeWhen I say âno,â(TM) I mean âno, or not much,â(TM)â she notes... Kenyon, professor of biochemistry and biophysics at the UCSF, has been on her diet for two-and-a-half years. âoeI did it because we fed our worms glucose and it shortened their lifespan.â
"Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
Many comments here about protein, and the sources of protein, yadda. For some bizarre reason scientists and the general public assume that low carb means high protein. IT DOESN'T. Every responsible low carb diet makes it perfectly clear that one should not eat much protein. For one thing, your body will use it to make carbohydrates. Why people choose to ignore this is baffling. More fat, less protein, much less carbohydrate is the formula. Is it that difficult to remember?
And let's not fuss about 'good' fat vs 'bad' fat. There are two primary concerns: Trans fats are bad. The other is never mentioned- rancid fat. This is a problem due to the fad of switching from animal fats to vegetable fats that started around the'80s. The good thing about animal fat is you know when it is rancid- it stinks. But vegetable fat doesn't. You don't know that you are poisoning yourself with it. Buy the smaller container of vegetable oil (if you must use it; lard is acceptable) and put it in the refrigerator after you open the bottle. Throw it out if you have any doubt. Coconut and MCT oil seem pretty stable at room temp and they are very good fuel for athletes and diabetics and most people.
...omphaloskepsis often...
Quality of life past age 60 decreases rapidly. Trading some terrible years then for quality years now sounds like a decent exchange.
We all die sometime.
Living caused 100% of all deaths
cap: forest (that is somehow missed)
I've been diagnosed with diabetes a couple of years ago. I knew that lowering caloric intake can cure type 2 diabetes, but I am not fat, in fact, I am more on the skinny side, so I had few option of lowering my caloric intake much. However, I knew that carbs are associated with diabetes and started researching the issue more in depth. I decided to severely cut the amount of carbs I eat.
It was difficult at first, but as time went on, I gradually found it easier and easier. I replaced it with vegetables everywhere I could, which turns out to be a lot of places.
I am happy to announce that I have no symptoms or readings associated with diabetes anymore, and I do feel awesomely good. Whether this diet will shorten my life or not, I can't say (though I doubt it very much), but I really don't care. Quality of life matters more than length of life, and the quality of my life is so much higher than before the diet, I am glad to sacrifice a decade of shitty diabetic life for it.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
This is just reality... no point tormenting yourself over it.
A couple things.
I was looking stuff up and found that studies on the effects are CONTRADICTING EACH OTHER.
I would take the one that says that being on a ketogenic diet causes diabetes with a HUGE grain of salt - it's backwards of the others for instance.
Also there's a huge difference between being low carb and out of ketogenesis and low carb IN ketogenesis.
And there's a difference between relying on oils or fats or meat...
The fact is that we don't really have good information on the effects of macronutrient balance - doctors and the government have been making assumptions for years, but those assumptions were wrong. It turns out that you can't infer things in biological systems you can only measure.
Say it LOUD -- I'm WHITE and I'm Proud!
Celebrate White Pride Worldwide 365 !
Fourteen Words
The world needs fewer idiots who feel they must jump on the latest fashion bandwagon and proselytize it until they switch to the next one.
an easy way to feel good over the long term. That can't be unhealthy.
Yep.
As Sherlock Holmes showed us, cocaine is an easy way to feel good over the long term. It can't be unhealthy.
As many doctors told us in advertisement over the years, tobacco is an easy way to feel good over the long term. It can't be unhealthy.
Jeez, the percentage of idiots on Slashdot has never been higher.
There are so many possible explanations for this result, you can't draw these conclusions from this.
E.g. people who eat ~50% carbs might be the normal ones, living a relaxed life, not having the need for any diets. People who make diets, such as low carbs, might be more fat. Also, replacing carbs with nuts is pretty expensive. These are people with money, it is no surprise they live longer.
... the most deadly disease there is. There are no known cases of survival. Sometimes, regrettably it is associated with dementia and fear tho. I drink wine and beer, eat bread, noodles and meat too. Till some goodperson bans it or put under such prohibitive tax that nobody except the goodpeople can afford them I will continue doing so. Fuck goodpeople. When I was young I thought only evilpeople are bad for us. Not so now. Too many goodpeople telling me how evil I am because I live. My current answer to that is: fuck you.
Ach and my next car will most likely have diesel engine. In next elections I will vote right wing radicals (till they win and then I will be voting left wing variety).
High-carb diets promote insulin tolerance. Increased insulin tolerance leads to type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes leads to dozens of health complications.
It is not healthy to live on fast rushes of glucose (typical western grain-based diet).
Low-carb diets which contain more fat, fiber, and protein, sometimes called mediterranean diets, are proven to lead to lower rates of all the health issues related to increased insulin tolerance.
There is a lot of money in selling the typical western high-carb foods to people, and if people start eating healthier, they will also put less money into the whole medical system.
There is very little money to be made in a healthy population. The solution is to promote a diet that leads to a population stricken by diabetes and related ailments.
Those replacing carbs with steaks and cold cuts sure ruin the statistics.
It is not healthy to live on fast rushes of glucose (typical western grain-based diet).
There is no glucose rush from a grain diet, fucktard. Starches are polysaccharides.
It all metabolizes into primarily glucose, fucktard. American education much?
This study (really a survey) defines a low-carb diet as between 30-40% of calories. And the average is about 38% for the observed low-carbers.
That's lower carb, for sure, but it's not meaningfully low-carb. Ketosis (fat metabolism) doesn't begin until about 20% carbs (50-60g per day of carbs, as a rule of thumb).
A few months ago another study, 'proving' that low-carb diets had no advantages, also gave a firm conclusion recommending a 'plant based diet' while talking up low-carbing's supposed health issues. That study had low-carbing defined as 135g per a day, which is laughable.
It's as if the nutrition world is pushing a creationist diet (Adam and Eve were apparently vegetarians). Which is interesting, because Senator George McGovern, whose commission made it official US dogma that animal fat is bad for you, was a Christian. He pushed that agenda against the advice of his own scientists who advised him that the theory was unproven. The charts show the obesity epidemic starting at that point as diets went increasingly towards carbs. (Ironically, however, most of Christianity has never had a dogma of a literal translation of the bible; with Catholics even having the inventor of the Big Bang theory among their priests, Lemaitre; and Mendel, the father of modern genetics, was a monk).
Meanwhile, Stanford Uni did a study of a bunch of diets, including low-fat and Atkins, where the study lead, who was a longterm vegetarian, was surprised to find that Atkins beat all the other diets in improvements on every single cardio-vascular marker.
It's a fascinating youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eREuZEdMAVo
And meanwhile, in another study, vegetarian women hit the menopause several years earlier than normal people. And the fertility rate in men has dramatically dropped. hmmmm........
Well, i can tell you that I won't be getting a case of 'vegan face' any time soon.
What doesn't metabolize into glucose?
Ezekiel 23:20
The problem with ketogenic diet that no matter how much it improves certain health outcomes (cancer, neurological disorders, whatever) all of that pales in comparison to the leading killer ... heart disease. Cardiac arrest and it's influence on lifespan happen to be poorly captured in mouse models. Human epidemiology is always the final arbiter for long term health outcomes, but in this case there is little alternative.
I think despite the particle size angle, the extra cholesterol needed to digest the fat in a ketogenic diet will make it very unlikely to optimize human lifespan. We live long past our intended use by dates, the optimal diet for the functioning of our body during our prime isn't necessarily the best at keeping it running the longest.
Lots of uncontrolled variables in this study. Contradicts many others
Glad to see they didn't just say "low carb = death do the opposite." I worried at first it was going to be an article saying they found low carb people dying younger so therefor eat a ton of carbs all the time.
Instead it looks like they are actually saying low carb only shaved 2ish years off while high carb was actually the "true villain."
I'm 6 months into a keto diet. less than 20g carbs/day.. usually much less. Was over 240lb, now under 200lb, feeling better overall, and I eat as much as I want.. 1lb bacon(well less after cooking) day easy.
The anon comment about fat being bad.. Checkout My big fat fiasco on youtube, done by the guy who did fathead followup documentary...
https://www.youtube.com/result...
Also checkout Jordan Petersons daughters story.
http://mikhailapeterson.com/
Animal fats/saturated fats are the GOOD fats, we've been lied to all these years. Just like the flip flop on egg yokes.
Questionnaires? That's a flawed study right there.
People cannot tell the exact truth on lifestyle questionnaires. They can't because they don't track things to any detail, unless they are anal.
I've lost 50+ lbs about 5 times in my life. I keep a food journal when I'm loosing weight for the first month to get into the groove. Then I slack off a little more and more every week after that.
I also track weight daily, then slack off to weekly, and finally monthly ... as I begin to gain weight again by having more than 30% carbs. My body is highly sensitive to carbs. If I keep the carbs around 30% of calories, which is hard, I can maintain my weight loss.
I also have to exercise more and more. During weight loss, I exercise about 20-30 hrs a week. That's a huge commitment. To maintain, I have to exercise at least 10 hrs a week. I miss being thin, fit, and 25. I was almost an Olympic-level athlete. Back then I could eat anything. Around age 30, everything changed.
My body is highly efficient at storing carbs as fat and NOT burning those calories until forced. I need a job where I'm forced to be active 4+ hrs a day. The research shows that people like me (those whose bodies store fat efficiently) who don't change their jobs completely to be much more active will always gain the weight back.
I need to become a National Park ranger, it seems. Or work in landscaping. My programming job just doesn't cut it.
It all metabolizes into primarily glucose
Yes, it does. Over time, avoiding a rush. Glucose rush is what you get when you drink that glucose-filled American soft drink mixed with Russian vodka, ignoramus.
Once you stop using sugar you just lose the desire for it. it's not punishment. And that's the magic of low carbs. It's one of the few "diets" that doesn't lead to yo-yo. At least not for a subset fo people. It's sustainable.
It isn't for every one.
This just reminds me of reading some "article" by someone several years ago about why low carb was bad and not good for weight loss. They literally did low carb for 3-4 weeks.... then got off it and admitted to eating an entire cake... THEN complained about gaining weight after that day. They said something about how it was so great that they lost 2-3lbs while doing the diet then how they gained 4lbs the day after they quit it and ate *A CAKE*.
But replacing carbohydrates with more plant-based proteins and fats, such as legumes and nuts, was actually found to slightly reduce the risk of mortality.
I'm willing to bet that their risk of mortality remains at 100%.
Low carb is for everyone because before the human race started agriculture some 10 thousand years ago they did not have much carb to eat in the first place. Our ancestors had evolved with low carb diet in a hunter gatherer environment for million years.
In this decreases lifespan, but mantains, or actually increases, the number of healthy years in that decreased lifespan, is actually a welcome development.
*** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
You don't have to drink sugary drinks to get diabetes, the typical western diet will get you there without, even if it happens later in life. The T2 diabetes epidemic here in the west is not caused by drinking vodka drinks or eating sweets, it's primarily due to the explosive increase in consumption of modified wheats since the late 70's.
Now if you were to restrict your grain consumption and eat less and only eat whole grains then it might make a difference, but then again that's not what the typical western diet looks like.
I have a Carbohydrate Intolerance/Malabsorption problem you insensitive clod!
8.) Part of my PERSONAL hosts file's created by me. I give users the method to do the same via my program.
9.) SHOW ME where I said "ALL" adservers: Like vs. malware it's an ongoing process.
10.) Whitelists = maintenance & false positive nightmare (so are wildcards) - hosts specifics aren't.
11.) Resolution's FASTER via hosts (blocks don't matter: you don't intend to get to 'em) via fav. sites you spend most time @ online @ TOP of hosts CACHED IN RAM locally (faster vs. dns & no chance of redirect poisoning).
12.) Hosts do MORE for LESS, natively, vs. other so-called 'solutions' w/ less bugs & complexity for exploit.
13.) You're a psychiatric pro who did a formal exam of my alleged mental condition while in a professional psychiatric environs? No. You're a libelous troll that HIDES from me via UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous STALKING me OR who IMPERSONATES me!
APK
P.S.=> ENJOY YOUR DOWNMOD, in addition to PART #1/2 here dusting you https://science.slashdot.org/c... ... apk
This isn't even representative of low-carb lifestyle choices such as Keto, Atkins, etc.. It represents 'lower' carbohydrate diets based on a questionnaire, and does so poorly. Just look at Table 1 Population characteristics in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, by quantile:
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=true&tableId=tbl1&pii=S2468-2667%2818%2930135-X
Pretty interesting that among the 'low carb' quantile are the highest rates of smoking, the lowest levels of perceived activity, and the highest percentage of men... any one of which could also account for slight variations in the results of the questionnaire.
Eat more beans, it will save your life.
500 g of lard a day? You sound fat. Now, be a good boy and go be fat somewhere else.
"Modified grains"? That have glucose in them? Ooooh. Are you also worried about GMO cancer? You sound quite the nutjob. Are you a "personal trainer" or a "nutrition specialist" by any chance?
The Holy Bible says that humans can live up to 120 years. And, there was a study/stats taken to see which group of people live the longest and Japanese live longer than most. Does Japanese diet consist of high carbs. :) :)
Yeah, S won again... Fighting from victory not to victory.
Obesity is unhealthy. thats the alternative.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Are those your videos? That stuff is great and you should have posted this non-anonymously.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
1.) Do hosts stop threats served by hostname (the way threats are done most) by blocking them? Yes. 2.) Do hosts speed you up 2 ways in adblocking (preventing more infection/tracking/slowdown) & via hardcoded favorite sites resolving faster + protecting vs. dns down or redirect poisoned? Yes.
My hosts program's the only 1 that does the latter @ TOP of hosts cached in RAM (for best performance) & only 1 of its kind on Linux/BSD in easy to use flexible configuration GUI form.
(I also did that latter part LONG before the Chinese & 1st http://theregister.co.uk/2017/... )
* Have you done work that is that effective ? No.
APK
P.S.-> ANSWER THOSE 2 BOLDED QUESTIONS ABOVE so you shut yourself down... apk
That's the problem with self reporting on these studies. Most people can't even estimate short distances and you want them to estimate their diet?
The idea that you can extend the results of this study to the current definitions of "low carb" eating is bogus.
In this study "low carb" was 38% of calories from carbs.. way higher than anything you would need to approach nutritional ketosis (the target of current low-carb eating). In fact the group identified as "low carb" were basically "shitty lifestyle", and in the words of the study: "were more likely to be young, male, a self-reported race other than black, college graduates, have high body-mass index, exercise less during leisure time, have high household income, smoke cigarettes, and have diabetes."
So in fact the study showed something that is common sense.. people who don't care about their health fair worse than people who do.
Yeah, for me a low-carb diet is an obvious good thing. I was having trouble controlling my blood pressure, and even with lots of cardio (40 minutes 5 or 6 times a week) I was barely keeping it below 140. I tried the DASH diet, which is supposed to be good for blood pressure, but it's pretty heavy on the carbs (lots of whole grains and fruits) and my blood pressure actually got worse.
My GP suggested I try low-carb (family history of diabetes) and my blood pressure went way down. Now I'm in the 110 range even without cardio. I suspect having regular blood pressure will do more for my life expectancy than any benefit from carbs.
That's the thing about diets. Different people are different. Big surprise, right? No one diet is going to work for everyone. We've spent thousands upon thousands of years in various environments, with different selections of food available. It can't be surprising that people with different ancestry will react differently, even if you ignore the whole lactose tolerance thing.
There's actually some studies showing that being 20-40 pounds "overweight" can add a couple years to your life.
She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
Wait, there's at least one whoosh here.
You clearly have problems with reading comprehension. American much?
I'm sure there's something, but the concern is not the presence of glucose, but the amount of it. Generally you want to eats foods that metabolize into less glucose and over a longer period of time, as opposed to foods that result in high spikes of blood glucose such as sugars and refined white wheat.
This is just an obscured example of the Broken Window Fallacy. Healthy people spend money on many things, some of which will actually advance technology, many of which actually make lives better.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
I am approaching my 6th year on a low-carb high-fat diet. I am 5'11" tall and I weighed 172 when I started. I hold steady right around 160 now, +-5 lbs. Went from 34" waist to 32", and am still there.
I know plenty of people who chose a low-carb diet who were not overweight. I was in good shape (not my best) but saw significant improvements after only a month. Joint pain went away, my teeth are better, my cardio vascular health improved. I suspect these were due to things like lowering of inflammation due to drastically reduced sugar and grains. From an evolutionary perspective, we've only been farmers for 10k years.... so how did we evolve over 2mm years without farming? Go actually look at 2mm of something, then 10k of something. Not just the numbers, but that many things. It's staggering. We haven't evolved to eat the garbage we eat today is just high percentages and refinement.
However, you are partially right, but you don't know why.
People generally DO have health problems, they just don't know it - they are addicted to carbs. Your body tells you to carb up so you can get your blood sugar fix. Once you break that addiction and retrain your body to not ride the glucose roller coaster, everything just works better and more easily. Sure, there are people who do have health problems who benefit from it, but there are lots of regular and very fit people who follow it as well. It is gaining a lot of support in the scientific community as well, there are more and more studies about it that will benefit us all in the long run. Look up Peter Attia, Ron Krauss, Dom D'Agostino, Mark Sisson, Gary Taubes. There are more hard-core scientists, but those should give you a sense of what's out there.
You could read up on it and give it a try, for three weeks. Chances are you won't because you think eating like a caveman is silly. I did. You think it's a fad, and it's just for sick people. But you don't realize how much better you can feel until you do it. What's to lose, eating differently for 3 weeks? What's to gain, feeling a lot better with more energy and the ability to maintain your weight with little effort, potentially staving off diseases that are plaguing our society?
The only thing I felt bad about was that I didn't do it sooner in my life.
My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.
There is no possibility of controlling for all the relevant variables.
This conflates every kind of carbohydrate and fatty acid.
There are so many other things I could point out but this is enough to prove the worthlessness of the study.
Nutritionists and health food nuts have been trying to "fix" what people eat for decades. The fix is always worse than the original problem if there really was any problem to begin with. And so what if you live to be 95? You'll most likely have some debilitating degenerative disease that makes daily life pretty miserable.
Americans aren't 20-40 pounds "overweight".
Yeah, taking bullshit advice from the daughter of the man who thinks paintings of snakes fucking means humans knew what DNA is before microscopes existed. Good plan. Apparently the bullshittery doesn't fall far from the family tree.
But sick people spend, in addition, money on drugs and healthcare, which in America is not a structure to do good for society, but one to generate enormous profits for Big Pharma.
Americans don't face personal bankruptcy from going on vacation or buying exercise equipment, they face bankruptcy from being sick and not affording the medical bills.
Most folks eating "low carb"... would consider 30% carbs to be obscenely high; ketosis probably doesn't work for most people even at 10%.
Both the low carb folks and traditional dieticians would agree that fat is bad when you have enough carbs to trigger strong insulin responses. 30% carbs is going to trigger strong insulin responses, so both the low carb folks and the traditional dieticians could kinda look at this ahead of time and predict the outcome?
ding ding ding... That is exactly what I did. I have found that now I want zero sugar with any meal... however I can still enjoy a treat once and awhile. Its strange but once sugar is removed from your day to day diet, you simply don't crave it and you enjoy it more when you do have it.
It seems lost on modern people to simply comply with a HEALTHY balanced diet at a REASONABLE CALORIE INTAKE. Balanced diets would be some combo of 30(protein)-20(fats)-50(carbs). Within these proportions people should seek out the healthiest form of each. The problem with the modern Carb consumer is that all comes from breads and sugar, change that so being mostly vegetables and watch how it changes your life. Protein can also be ideal from lean sources(fish/poultry) and/or vegetarian sources (nuts/legumes/lentils). Lastly(and most importantly) people need to not consume more than they burn. If you sit all day then you shouldn't eat much.... period.
The science behind this isn't voodoo, the longest lived people are Okinawan and Seventh Day Adventist for good reason, look at what they eat and how they live.
On high protein diets, I think these have a place in moderation.. namely if you are an athlete or trying to trim up. They aren't meant to be long term diets however.
No one should ever take that retard APK's advise on security. Why?
Apart from being a well known prolific spammer, harasser, and liar his work has many failing.
Most notably is the false premise that hosts provides good security. The truth is that black lists are the worst way to try and do security. They can never list all possible hosts or even all hosts in a sub domain. They are easily circumvented and are always out of date. This still ignores the amount of effort it takes to maintain them. Everything that APK is trying to accomplish is better done by other available solutions.
When one successfully refutes what APK says he is unable to respond in his own defense and will attempt to change the subject to deflect from his own failure. Like when he says hosts does port filtering, that the Chinese copied him, that security experts agree with him. Each and every time APK failed to refute anything said about his statements even when what he said was shown to be false and every time tried to change the subject because he lost.
APK is a failure and a retard, never take his advise.
1.) Users disagree w/ you by DOZENS https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...
2.) ObjectPascal is #12/20 on the TIOBE index https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-in... (& has never left top 20 since 2001) - FAR from "arcane" (like C++, it's a classic here to stay).
3.) I've used Linux & *NIX before you were BORN most likely (*NIX thru the 80's & Linux on/off since 1994)
4.) Windows version doesn't need anymore work (see #1 reviews of it above).
5.) See #1 above for EXACT QUOTES registered /.ers stated
6.) BSD version IS done in latest Linux model (BSD keeps binary compatiblity w/ Linux afaik).
7.) My source was audited by Steven Burn of Malwarebytes (not some amateur) who hosts it & recommends it also
APK
P.S.=> Part #2/2 https://science.slashdot.org/c...
You RAN from answering 2 simple questions https://science.slashdot.org/c... & it's all anyone needs to see!
* YOU LOSE, loser...
APK
P.S.=> The day a BLOWHARD hotair windbag do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" like YOU does better than I have? Then you can talk, talker... apk
What solution does MORE for less resource use & complexity leading to their exploitation - DNS/AntiVirus/Addons? All security issue riddled resource hogs vs. hosts!
Wildcards lead to FALSE POSITIVES GALORE (hosts specifics do not & are easy to edit) - whitelists are maintenance nightmares even moreso!
Hosts SPEED YOU UP 2 ways:Hardcoded favorite sites avoiding slower security issue riddled DNS & blocking ads alone offsets any parse & THE ONLY PARSE THAT HAS TO BE FAST is your FAVORITE SITES you spend MOST TIME @ online @ TOP of hosts cached in RAM operating in kernelmode (blocked ones, the majority of my hosts file, you NEVER intend to get to anyhow stupid)!
NoScript has to PARSE ads script src tags etc.: Hosts don't & OPERATE LONG BEFORE NoScript does on 3rd party scripts (the most dangerous ones) in kernelmode speed making NoScript REDUNDANT SLOWER USELESS!
APK
P.S.=> You are just (& yes, I've gotta say it) "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" to BLOW AWAY... apk
Would of been available? How about would have been available. Hard to take seriously people who canâ(TM)t handle basic grammar/ spelling.
Shut your fucking shit bag mouth APK.
You ran and hid and now make demands of others while pissing yourself in the corner because you are a pussy who can't defend yourself.
You demand other post their address but are too much of a pussy cake to do so yourself when you threaten people.
I don't threaten vs. a NOBODY
Shut your fucking pie hole you lying sack of shit.
You threaten people all the time and when called on it you hide in the fucking corner and piss yourself.
So come on pussycake post your fucking address
Yes, you truly ARE a nobody & it shows in FAR MORE than just your UNIDENTIFIABLE stalkings of me (chickenshit bitch you are) - it shows in you being a DO-NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" UNSKILLED & UNDEREDUCATED waste of life LOSER too, lol!
* By the way: Make me you shitbrain punk (newsflash - you can't & I don't obey a NOBODY like you or "your kind" (wastes of life)).
APK
P.S.=> ... & you KNOW it (+ constantly PROVE it too) - Bugs Bunny has more REAL IDENTITY than you do - so in threatening a punk that hides like you? I literally am NOT threatening anyone real - you LOSE, stupid, always, vs. me - accept it... apk
I'm James Shareef from USA, I have been suffering from (HERPES) disease for the past 13 months and had constant pain, especially in my knees. During the first month , I had faith in God that I would be healed someday.This disease started to circulate all over my body and I have been taking treatment from my doctor, a few weeks ago I came on search on the internet if I could get any information concerning the prevention of this disease, on my search I saw a testimony of someone who has been healed from (Hepatitis B and Cancer) by this Man DR JOHN and she also gave the email address of this man and advise we should contact him for any sickness that he would be of help, so I wrote to DR JOHN telling him about my (HERPES Virus) he told me not to worry that I was going to be cured!! hmm i never believed it,, well after all the procedures and remedy given to me by this man few weeks later I started experiencing changes all over me as the DR assured me that I have cured, after 2 weeks i went to my doctor to confirmed if I have been finally healed behold it was TRUE, So friends my advice is if you have such sickness or any other like HSV1,2,HPV1,2,3,CANER HIV,COLE SORES,TOOTH JOHN, ETC you can email DR JOHN on drjohnhivcurehome@gmail. com sir I am indeed grateful for the help I will forever recommend you to my friends!!! with your lovely Email Address or you can also phone/Whats App him on this number +2347064365391
it's hard to say... they use "obese" and "overweight".
And the standard for that changes constantly.
Like for diabetes, 10 years ago 125 was "pre diabetic". Now it's "diabetic".
Like for "binge" drinking. Having 5 drinks in 5 hours is "binge" drinking. "Binge" sounds horrible... but 5 drinks in 5 hours would not even give you a buzz.
She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.