Slashdot Mirror


Google Removes Accounts Tied To Iran-Led Misinformation Campaign (engadget.com)

In a blog post, Google shared an update regarding its efforts to combat state-sponsored phishing attacks and to remove accounts associated with an influence operation linked to Iran. Engadget reports: The company said that in recent months, it has detected and blocked state-sponsored groups from targeting political campaigns, journalists, activists and academics with phishing attempts. Google has also been working with the cybersecurity group FireEye, which has been providing Google with information on an Iran-based misinformation operation. FireEye identified three email accounts, three YouTube channels and three Google+ accounts linked to that operation, which Google subsequently took down.

In conjunction to the intelligence provided by FireEye, Google also investigated other suspicious groups linked to Iran. The company identified and removed 39 YouTube channels, six Blogger blogs and 13 Google+ accounts it believed to be connected to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. Relevant videos on the now-terminated YouTube channels had garnered 13,466 views in the U.S.
Facebook and Twitter were also made aware of the Iranian operation. Twitter announced that it suspended 284 accounts believed to have originated from Iran for "engaging in coordinated manipulation." Meanwhile, Facebook said it removed "652 pages that it says were linked to a campaign originating in Iran, as well as an unspecified number of accounts liked to Russian military intelligence services," reports Engadget.

87 comments

  1. Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iran isn't accused of helping Trump collude to disenfranchise US voters, so are Republicans ready to admit the fact that Iran is attempting to influence us? That seems to be the sole source of their doubts about Russia, that anything Putin "did wrong" that they admit "exists" might ultimately be tied to Trump knowing about it and covering it up incompetently in front of Mueller. (It's hard to keep up with their bullshit platform frankly)

    1. Re:Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, it's true that Republicans hate Iran, because Israel hates Iran and wants to kill Iranians thus Republicans and Democrats hate Iran and want to kill Iranians.

      What I want to know is what this "influence" is about. If "influence" is just publishing a bit of text this is fairly ridiculous since it's what the social sites are for in the first place. If they want to ban influence they should ban any political content and perhaps any reporting on current events. Ban all accounts linked to any politics and media.
      And I've not talked about advertising which is by definition influence.

    2. Re:Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's kind of a different thing when THE SOURCE of the content is nation-states or a military branch of, as coordinated disinformation campaigns have been infiltrated by US intel and their tentacles identified. That's what happened here.

      It's not Sergei Brin eyeballing content and saying "Nah, no Iran shit, this is gone." It's much more involved. Yes, transparency on how that "works" is a good idea. But they were pretty up-front about this action, that's certainly not nothing.

    3. Re:Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      helping Trump collude to disenfranchise US voters

      https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disenfranchise

      so are Republicans ready to admit the fact that Iran is attempting to influence us?

      Everyone tries to "influence" everyone, Russia included. Remember when Obama flew to London to try to "influence" the brexit vote by threatening Britain? Or when Mexico "influenced" every election in living memory by shipping millions of their citizens here to produce millions of voting-legal children? Or when the CIA tried to "influence" dozens of countries since WW2 through everything from media propaganda campaigns to coups to full-blown military invasions?

      (It's hard to keep up with their bullshit platform frankly)

      Because apparently you're only learning about it through third-hand twitter accounts, deranged cable news personalities, and the voices in your head. The "platform" - agreed to by everyone with the psychological capability to look halfway objectively at the evidence, including Comey and, as far as we know, Mueller - is that of course Russia tried to "influence" the election, but that neither Trump nor anyone on his staff had any role in it. Moreover since this "influence" seems to amount to little more than some facebook posts and twitter bots, the fact that anyone even gives a shit is fucking bizarre.

    4. Re:Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Apart from when Russia hacked the DNC and released the emails to stir up controversy (even though eventually nothing damning was found in them), which Trump apparently knew of before the emails were released.

      And as for the CIA, two wrongs don't make a right.

    5. Re:Wait, do Republicans acknowledge this exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His name was Seth Rich

  2. Jihad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a duty of ALL Muslims. It is written in the Noble and most Holy Qur'an.

    1. Re:Jihad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's the job of Iran, Russia, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon to kick their arses and win the war against jihadi.

  3. Who judges fake news? by manu0601 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We are told fake news were removed, but we have no sample of the suppressed speech so that we can make up our own mind about it. It looks a lot like censorship.

    1. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "We are told fake news were removed," - Nope, you were told a disinformation campaign traced to Iran was removed. "Fake News' is a Fox News tagline for mentally deficient denialists to deny the fact-checked record.

    2. Re:Who judges fake news? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      It is, at least if what Google censored is similar to what Facebook censored, which has more integrity than a lot of legitimate US media.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Who judges fake news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Why, Google will judge for us, of course. They have all the smart people working for them. We can trust them. And as for censorship? Google just had thousands of employees revolt over complying with China's censorship. Surely they would never agree to what the Western ruling class wants censored. It's not like they're a part of it. They are rebels, loners, fighting the good fight against...the Islamic Republic of Iran? Hmm I thought Islamophobia was a big no-no? Anyway the point is to trust Google and not question their judgment.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Who judges fake news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Fake news you say? You mean like this?

      On Saturday, dozens of media outlets reported that federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested an illegal alien who was taking his wife to the hospital to deliver their baby - but they conveniently left out one key detail: the man was a wanted murder suspect.

      The timing of the media's latest deception to demonize the Trump administration for political gain comes just two days after more than 350 newspapers wrote op-eds bemoaning President Donald Trump's attacks on the media for inaccurately covering news stories and for sometimes reporting blatantly false information.

      https://www.dailywire.com/news...

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Who judges fake news? by arbiter1 · · Score: 0

      Only claims it was traced to iran is google who is known to be leftist and removed things before. So just like OP post said its more like censorship since we don't know what was posted was true or false. We are feed daily news that complete load of bs while legit news is blocked and down graded in an attempt to prevent people from learning the truth. Not saying its facts what was posted but can't say its fake as only stuff we know about what is going on over there is handed out by the government and liberal media. They can ram what ever narrative they want in your face and most people now accept it as 100% truth like how they rammed the WMD's in Iraq story.

    6. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're saying a coordinated disinformation campaign has more integrity than legitimate US media? Thanks for outing yourself as a nutty fool, moron! Just TODAY Trump retweeted a (proven false) white supremacist "news item" about South Africa's government killing white people do redistribute their farmland, which has been entirely debunked and came from some bleeding asshole at Breitbart's pity party, then was picked up by none other than (dick) Tucker Carlson, which Trump then viewed during "cheeseburger romance hour" (work hours, for other presidents) and subsequently made a ton of BS claims (official BS claims, mind you, he's the BS President) and subsequently became your "source of information" - because you're a moron, again. The reason we have a media is to fact check things.

      You're afraid of the fact checking, because all of Republicanism is now afraid of the fact checking. You can't survive it.

    7. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the end the truth comes out, whether you can handle it or not! Certainly fact-checking media makes mistakes from time to time, yes - BUT YOU MAKE THOSE INTENTIONALLY, ALL THE TIME, CONSTANTLY!

      Trump just re-tweeted some bullshit story about South Africa (pushed by white supremacist bullshitter/traitors) and you just suck it up because you're too stupid to ATTEMPT to fact check it! So yes, media makes mistakes.
      Trump makes policy based on intentional mistakes. Both are bad, but you're defending one of them.

    8. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, US intelligence tipped them off you lying cunt. Learn to read TRUMPTARDS.

      "The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, is investigating possible pardon offers to former aides, and Mr. Trump’s current lawyers were privately concerned that debating clemency could open him to accusations of trying to interfere with the investigation, according to two people briefed on the matter."

    9. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      none of all misinformation campaigns coming out from USA are supressed, that should give you a big tip

    10. Re:Who judges fake news? by fredrated · · Score: 1

      The SF Chronicle report I read clearly said he was wanted for murder in Mexico.

    11. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And dozens if not hundreds of media outlets did mention that the man was a homicide suspect.

      Oh, did you mention that the alleged homicide took place in Mexico, not in the USA? No, you didn't. See how easy this "fake news" tag is to pin? Here, have one.

    12. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to know what's really going on here. America judges Iran through the lense of its hatred.

    13. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how this citation thing works. You need to provide a link.

    14. Re:Who judges fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Funny how the JEWISH media keeps claiming that 'Russia meddled in the election', but never show us some of the TENS OF THOUSANDS of Facebook posts which they presumably must have made to "meddle". And LOL at the phrase "meddled in the election", trying to imply that merely WRITING something so that people can read it is the same as fraud in the actual VOTING process. Of course, it was Clinton's side who were engaged in election fraud, with their laughable 'electronic voting' machines, but there were so many people supporting Trump (just look at the size of his campaign rally crowds compared to Clinton's) that Clinton's lot couldn't get away with it.

      This bullshit is getting ridiculous, but what's worse is that there are still loads of people who believe the horseshit that the media pumps out every day about the 'evil' Russians and Iranians.

    15. Re:Who judges fake news? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Engaging in breathless whataboutism does not reflect particularly well on you or your argument.

    16. Re:Who judges fake news? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's not whataboutism, it's proof positive fake news exists and is still going strong. Heck, how did all those newspapers collude behind the scenes to produce the same editorial on the same day? WTF? And they claim they don't work together to bias the news!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:Who judges fake news? by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      We're not smart enough to make up our own minds.

  4. Influencers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An influencer campaign that uses Google+ accounts? I donâ(TM)t think we have much to worry about.

  5. Read the report yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/blog/pdfs/rpt-FireEye-Iranian-IO.pdf

    Seems like the main crime they committed was supporting Palestine, and opposing human rights violations in Saudi Arabia.

    "Multiple regionally focused Liberty Front Press Twitter accounts
    have retweeted content from the original affiliated Twitter
    accounts (@libertyfrontpr and @libertyfrontp) that contained,
    for example, anti-Saudi, anti-Israel, pro-Palestine, and antiTrump
    sentiments."

    Oh no, how ever shall our democracy survive an anti-Saudi tweet! SHUT IT DOWN!

    1. Re:Read the report yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Broadly speaking, the intent behind this activity appears to
      be to promote Iranian political interests, including anti-Saudi,
      anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes, as well as to promote
      support for specific U.S. policies favorable to Iran, such as the
      U.S.-Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). In the context of the U.S.-focused
      activity, this also includes significant anti-Trump messaging
      and the alignment of social media personas with an American
      liberal identity. However, it is important to note that the activity
      does not appear to have been specifically designed to influence
      the 2018 US midterm elections, as it extends well beyond US
      audiences and US politics. "

      Wait, what law does this violate? Hell, what terms of service does it violate?

    2. Re:Read the report yourself... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I have misgivings about approaching state sponsored propaganda efforts in this way, but what you're saying is demonstrably incorrect. YouTube et al hosts plenty of videos with the themes you mention. If the themes were the problem, rather than the source, we wouldn't see that.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  6. You can't handle the truth, GOP. Literally, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're afraid of the fact checking, because all of Republicanism is now afraid of the fact checking. You can't survive it.

    Neckbeard just tried to vouch for a coordinated disinformation campaign, and Trump did that today also verbatim. You are too stupid to fact check for yourselves anymore, it appears. Yes, it's a dangerous problem.

    I can't solve your stupidity or factual problems to make you less likely to succumb to manipulative authoritarian bullshitters, and you are programmed not to listen to anyone who disagrees. It's an impasse, but you lose.

    In the end the truth comes out, whether you can handle it or not!

  7. Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by najajomo · · Score: 1

    How sad to see slashdot reduced to spouting neocon cyber-büll-shít :[

    1. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realize Iran is anti-Trump right? He cancelled Obama's nuclear deal.

    2. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realize Facebook partners with the Atlantic Council i.e. NATO as a source of authority on fake news and "elections interference"?

      This story for once has about jack shit to do with Trump.

    3. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone with a brain and functional balls is anti Trump, he's a pathetic craven lying pile of strewn dogshit in animus. He lied about Iran's compliance (they did technically comply) in his BS spiel scrapping the deal. #Fact check it.
      The deal was meant to be limited to nuclear/missile capabilities, for that reason. Trump shits on strategy and prefers dumbass "look-strong" tactics, then when his speech is over everyone realizes HE HAS NO PLAN AT ALL.

      Right now, Iran is keeping (AFAAK) their side of the agreement WITH THE REST OF THE CIVILIZED WORLD, even though the US balked and reapplied sanctions. So Iran lives up to their agreement while Trump fails the West.

      Republicans don't want to admit the truth can be fact checked on this and most topics. (It would end their bullshit party, quickly.)

    4. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you say is true but he also publicly ranted about the Deep State. Perhaps in the same breath sometimes, which is deeply ironic.
      He also promised the US out of Syria real soon, right before the false flag chemical attack (which didn't happen so I'm not sure it can even be called a false flag)

      He had capitulated before and made a speech about continuing the war in Afghanistan, though he wanted to end it, before getting elected.
      The man is highly incoherent. Wanting to end wars and fight the Deep State while doing everything Israel wants, which is in cahoots with the Deep State, and doing everything the Sauds want (same thing).
      I'm anti Trump, by default, for a long lists of reasons. Boy are you USians going to suffer with the planned gutting of the public sector. This gutting of the federal State is something that would be comprehensible if the US had got invaded and lost a major war.
      He's still the closest to an anti-war US president I remember.

    5. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      I hardly see it as convincing anyone and all it does is put forward the question, are the corporate douche bags censoring US government propaganda in other countries to protect those countries citizens from the mountains of bullshit coming out of the US. Are the winning the censor law, nope, they are just crippling their businesses. They are simply pushing the censorship button as hard as they can until the public react.

      Of course the typical complain but the mug punters will be mislead. Reality is, mug punters don't give much intellectual thought to anything and vote with the dumb gut, for whom ever. The smart campaigns, they involve people who want to be involved and who want to be informed and they drag along the rest. You simply can not censor them over the long term. You only need to fail to censor them once, censor their ability to access the truth, and you lose them forever.

      All Google and Facebook are doing right now is showing how weak they are, how little influence they have in reality. The reality is, it is the people that use Google and Facebook who have the influence, lose them and you lose that influence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Wow the foreign troll shills are out in force in this thread.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:Insert neocon cyber-büll-shít .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting used to be called a troll or here, a troll shill. It's.. unfunny.
      It's not my fault if Putin is more reliable and truthful that the US administration or the UK gov. That's the way things are. Whether I get paid by some secret cabal or not Russia still is winning the war and allowing for the return of refugees while the US/NATO drag their feet and are pissed about it. lol, fuck NATO.
      I'm in a NATO country and never traveled outside NATO, but I'm free to hate these righteous clowns. If you're living in NATO, don't enlist in the military. If you're in the military, desert and ask to go to prison. Don't work for the aerospace industries. They want you to be happy when sandnïggers are blasted to pieces and the production of weapons is increased.

  8. South Africa govt says it's true, also ABC News by raymorris · · Score: 2, Informative

    "South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa announced earlier that the ruling political party, the African National Congress, had agreed to a proposal to alter the country's constitution and allow for land expropriation, or seizure by the government, without compensation", reports ABC News.

    The official South Africa government Twitter account added:
    "South Africa will speed up the pace of land reform"

    It seems someone told you some fake news.

  9. RayMorris is a lying faggot now, apparently. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing about propaganda, it has a shred of truth. However Trump didn't stop at truth, he tweeted that the government was sanctioning the murder of white farmers to redistribute their land. It's complete dogshit.
    You didn't post what the supremacists' BS included, you reported on the small shred of truth and left the spiel out. Ray Morris, DO you have a problem becoming an actual functional male, with functional gonads and integrity?

    It's mostly BS with a hint of truth :
    There IS a government program to expand black ownership of farms, but it (obviously, you fucking moron) doesn't work as Trump or your white supremacist faggot shit source asserted. (Truth hurts liars exclusively bruh)
    White farmers who own 72% of South Africa's farmlands, a holdover from apartheid, and who don't measure significantly in South African homicides as victims.

    Certainly the government isn't targeting them for death, you fucking moron lol.

    Try fact checking for a change - Trump could have learned this lesson a while back but like all moronic fascists he refuses to learn that something he wants to believe isn't actually true, lol. Enjoy the Mueller indictments!
    "Oh I want to sit down with him, of course I do..." - Ray Morris supports this lying cunt? Of course! He SAYS he's innocent and for all Ray's willing to fact check, that's entirely true! Lol, moron.

    1. Re:RayMorris is a lying faggot now, apparently. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > However Trump didn't stop at truth, he tweeted that the government was sanctioning the murder of white farmers to redistribute their land.
      The leader of the free world has access to information sources that you do not.

  10. US intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Failbook and Twatter acting on behalf of US intelligence is not something to be proud of.

    How come they'll do nothing about the "White Helmets"? This one is as "inauthentic" a group can get, and a really big influence campaign as well. Their goal, largely successful for now : to make the public support war and violently overthrowing a government.
    What they like to do when they're not being "heroes" who save children : https://en.insidesyriamc.com/2017/11/24/famous-white-helmets-fb-accounts-exposed-look-into-their-eyes-again-photos/ ... I found this site because they were censored on twitter! Or whatever accounts twitting its content. I don't particularly care about this site nor do I vouch for its quality.

    So White Helmets should be banned by a concerted effort from Failbook, Twitter, Apple and Google. But it's funded by US intelligence, MI5 and a number of other countries all or mostly NATO. They don't get banned!

    1. Re:US intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was not a "Google censorship decision" on any level as "Arbiter1" blatantly lied to assert and try to pin on "google being leftist" - because he's a lying faggot. Period, full stop.

      Whatever you think about White Helmets, fine, that's not what we were talking about, I was refuting a lying faggot with the facts. I don't know about "the truth" behind White Helmets.
      Until they mount a propaganda campaign that the US finds a threat, the US intel probably won't act on it like they did on Iran or Russia. That's kind of basic shit, and shouldn't surprise anyone.

      Nice try to change the subject, noted, but Arbiter1 is still a lying faggot regardless however, along with lying faggot Ray Morris above. Your red herring may be true or not, I'm not really in a position to debate it.

    2. Re:US intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to say that Google is not leftist, that's fine, I will agree.
      I'm a European leftist and I would never call Democrat warmongers or the CIA leftists.

  11. Keep the content. Label it. by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead of sending all these Facebook/Twitter postings down the memory hole, they should just flag them: "These are posts which we have reason to believe originated with Iranian operatives" (or Russian military, or whatever they think it is). Give people the option to hide these posts, or to browse them, or whatever they want to do. Personally, I'd be curious to look at them, at least briefly. It could perhaps lead me to be better informed about what the various state actors are up to on social media. It would certainly do a lot to raise public awareness of that problem.

    The current solution sucks, since it does nothing to raise awareness of the problem, and raises the possibility that Facebook is engaging in censorship for their own reasons. As others have observed on this thread: it smells a little gamey when Facebook says "We're going to delete all these posts because we think they originated with [x]. No, we're not going to tell you why we think that".

    The solution to speech you don't like is to add more speech of your own. The solution is never to suppress the speech you don't like.

    1. Re: Keep the content. Label it. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I am al for blocking these accounts on facebook and twitter. We should go further. Just block people who have a different opinion.

      Before you reply, think if that downside is really one.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  12. Now they are removing the Iranians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are removing the Iranians under the pretense of 'security'

    Then they will target someone else --- the Chinese, the Pakis, the Africans, the Buddhists, the ...

    When it's all done, they'll ban the conservatives (actually they have started to do so)

    Then the Christians will be next on the list

    By the time they start targeting the LGBT there will be no one else to voice objection

  13. Go See Fox News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to see Iranian disinformation requoted as fact.... go turn on Fox News. You might think I'm kidding, but no,....
    https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/03/media/fox-news-trump-obama-iran-deal/index.html

    If you want fake news watch Fox News, but Google don't have to copy Fox fake News.

  14. Accounts accused of backing Iran nuclear treaty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The satanic arch-z-onist who owns Facebook stated that the so-called 'Iran' accounts were removed because they had a pro-nuclear treaty 'bias'- you know that treaty that Trump illegally tore up.

    Of course the depraved war criminal who rules in Isr-el told America they had to destroy that treaty "or else". It is amatter of historic fact that the sick racist state of Isr-el gave the racist white despots of Apartheid era South Africa Isr-eli built nuclear warheads, warheads that South Africa gave up when it went to majority rule.

    Facebook banned Alex Jones- a hyper z-onist who publishes slander against Iran daily to help promote the coming Iran War- in order to set a precedent by which it could then erase all problematic anti-war pages. In the last week a growing number of LEFT-WING anti-war blogs etc have found themselves banned by tech giants. Jones, of course, runs a massive operation in Austin Texas alongside no end of mainstream media operations and military-industrial propaganda outlets. His 'banning' merely drove more traffic to his site (as desired). But the real targets of the new censorship, thousands of tiny free speech outlets in many anti-establishment directions, know they are dead if they do not "toe the line".

    Trump is only under apparent 'legal' trouble to give him the 'Bill Clinton' style excuse when he starts the war on Iran, the war craved by the leaders of the Democratic and Republican parties. The war Hilalry Clinton promised to deliver if she was elected president.

    You will be seeing an even greater level of Iran demonisation by Slashdot in the coming weeks.

  15. Until Google removes accounts to by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    at least one US-lead disinformation campaign, this is censorship on behalf of the US government, and nothing else.

    Remember Iraq having nukular weapons, ready to strike in under 4 hours? Remember "Alkaida operating out of Baghdad"? Remember "Syria chemical weapons facilities bombed", when the said facilities were inspected by OPCW months early and declared clean? Remember Hans Blix?

    All these lies were used as excuses for massive wars, which brought an enormous amount of suffering. In combination, the propaganda and the wars are a crime against humanity.

    But where's the outrage?

    1. Re:Until Google removes accounts to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US disinformation is harder to catch than extra missiles photoshopped into official military threat videos, lol. Sorry kiddo, but you keep at it okay? Trump is going to blow the lid off his self-imposed Watergate, he's his own deep throat!

    2. Re:Until Google removes accounts to by Gavagai80 · · Score: 0

      Remember Iraq having nukular weapons, ready to strike in under 4 hours? Remember "Alkaida operating out of Baghdad"?

      Nope, because Bush wasn't crazy enough to use lies that obviously silly (plus there's no way America would've been willing to go to war with a country that could inflict serious damage back). WMDs was the chant, because they thought Iraq might still have the chemical weapons the USA sold them.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Until Google removes accounts to by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      because they thought Iraq

      Because they made it up, you mean.

    4. Re:Until Google removes accounts to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH RO! NOT HANS BRIX!

    5. Re:Until Google removes accounts to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL really? It is the same crap, just amplified many times over. As for Trump, whatever he is to you, around him are the same neocon bunch that put "Mission Accomplished" above Mr. Dubya's round head.

      Are you children learning?

  16. Slashdot is z-ist to the max... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Washington loves the two most depraved states on the Earth equally, Isr-el and Saudi Arabia. And the z-onists and wahhabis are blood brothers. Slashdot is just another media mouthpiece for the one, and thus the other. Every day Slashdot tries to demonise Iran.

    The excuse given by the z-onist owners of Facebook for banning the 'Iran' accounts was that they dared to support the Iran nuclear treaty.

    I'm reminded of when Tony Blair blew up the Serbia equivalent of the BBC HQ (civilian TV centre) because the station dared to run programs criticising Tony Blair's Kosovo War, and dared to show images of the thousands of civilians Blair murdered in Serbia. The actual BBC stated the bombing was justified (many many civilian workers were slaughtered) because the Serbs had no right to tell the truth when it ran against 'british' propaganda interests. Indeed it was a BBC foreign correspondent who phoned back to confirm all the foreign journalists had left the target building for the night, so the RAF could then murder ever civilian Serb who remained in the HQ. Jill Dando- a BBC journalist who fronted the anti-serb war propaganda- was murdered at her home in revenge shortly afetrwards.

    Or perhaps you prefer the example of Loony Tunes cartoons that used nazi-style racist imagery to demonise the people of Japan during WW2.

    In a time of WAR, the 'enemy' is to be denied a voice regardless of truth. The tech giants know the war on Iran has actually begun, and are acting accordingly.

  17. SOMEONE HELP LYING REPUBLICAN FAGGOTS READ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Killings are at a 20 year low! http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-white-farmers-20180823-story.html (LEARN TO READ REPUBLICAN FAGGOTS, IT'S LITERALLY THE CURE FOR WHAT AILS YOU DUMB CUNTS.)

    Yes, Trump has ACCESS to information - but he doesn't read it, and relies on Fox News BULLSHIT parroting white supremacist faggots instead, and looks like a moron for doing it in front of the world.

    *(Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like HELPING LYING REPUBLICAN FAGGOTS LEARN TO READ!)

    You want to crawl up Trump's lying faggot ass, go right ahead moron, I won't stop you. You have a choice to be a moron, like all Republicans in this era.

    Last chance, bitches. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/last-chance-republicans/2018/08/23/5c2fc152-a6f7-11e8-a656-943eefab5daf_story.html

    1. Re: SOMEONE HELP LYING REPUBLICAN FAGGOTS READ? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I like how you link to more fake news in order to prove that you're not linking to fake news.

      For the record, even using their own statistics, attacks on farmers have INCREASED; it's only resultant deaths which have decreased. This shouldn't be surprising given that farmers have been working for years to improve their security measures and build groups to protect each other. Only a moron would focus on the number of deaths while ignoring an increase in attacks.

      I await your next fake news link with bated breath.

  18. Re:Keep the content. Label it. by greenwow · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why I love /.'s -1 moderation. You can still see the posts if you want to, but generally don't have to.

  19. Slashdot Infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore most posts on this story, there is a clear deception/distraction campaign here. The truth of this story comes from reading the article and finding related ones with more information. This website has been compromised by both Iranian and Russian paid liars.

    1. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical US propaganda or paranoia. Russians under your bed. I got called a Russian on slashdot but all I can concede is I live within 10,000 kilometers of Russia. I also sometimes drink Russian Earl Grey. Oh crap it's made by Twinnings! I have bad news for you, the UK just pretends to be russophobic after all. They'll soon betray you!

    2. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      No, that's just Putin's wet dream. He knows in his heart of hearts that the UK can kill him by themselves, and they won't be alone in any war. Putin is a scared little man afraid of reality. Putin will die soon, killed by the peasants he robs daily, if not by his own cadre for a bit more money than he pays them.

    3. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He'll sink the UK fleet then they'll be stuck on their little island. Good riddance.

    4. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. The Russians navy is a pitiful little thing! It couldn't even beat the Japanese in 1904-5, losing no less than 2 entire fleets. More recently their top of the line carrier was spotted belching black smoke while it trawled through the Channel, and needed emergency repairs for the tugboat that it brought along to make sure it could finish the trip. Even more recently, a Russian frigate sunk in the Black sea after impacting a small cargo freighter carrying cattle. Cows vs Russians, Cows won too. None of these things exactly inspire dread in anyone, but probably more than a little laughter.

    5. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, they're buying the same ships as the americans!

    6. Re:Slashdot Infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can bet that any dictator in power as long as Putin knows very well how to protect himself against peasants and "his own cadre".

      The UK is a scared little country of gasbag geezers with delusions of grandeur. James Bond isn't real, honey.

  20. while US based WMD information is allowed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    sure..while US based WMD information is endorsed and further propagated

  21. R A Y M O R R I S I S A L Y I N G F A G G O T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Ray, the government program to increase black farm ownership exists, but nobody is being murdered by the South African government to accomplish that unlike what Tucker Carlson reported and Trump repeated.

    And now YOU have added YOUR name to the pile of lying faggots, that's very interesting.

  22. https://www.smoseoservices.in/blog/video-design-co by SmoSeoSem · · Score: 1

    video design company in Kandivali Inventive gives gainful points of interest for kick you off with spreading out and building up your Android versatile application progress. As an Android Application Development gathering, we are steadily examining for the correct congruity between tasteful flawlessness and amazing handiness. video design company in Kandivali Our progress pack have made and moved many best inclining applications in the Google business center, which has helped our customers to discover new clients and additionally to make a more grounded bond with the present client base. We conceptualize to make the best application thoughts for your great position. We also make the application insights that satisfy the present utilitarian criteria. https://www.smoseoservices.in/...

  23. rahple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, Get the best celebration ever with our Blank ATM card and be a Millionaire, Cool way to have financial freedom!!! Are you tired of living a poor life, here is the opportunity you have been waiting for, We give out a Blank ATM Card. Do you want to live a good life? though its illegal, its not traceable and its the easiest way to be a millionaire. Get your card today and live that luxury life you always dream to live and to get this card, contact us via email:(rahplemillerblankatmcard@gmail.com)or contact our whatspp on +2349035823530 to get yours now.

  24. Mike Pence and Rand removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kidding, but who trusts google on this?

    Google have been actively helping/working with the DNC on the last election.

    Currently one of googles AI labs is making 'automated opinion steering'. Which are both bots and flagging any topic which can be used to market a political opinion. (ie one found you can get multiple paid writers in to try and sway opinion)

  25. Russia wants to play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So knock them out of the ballpark!

    1. Re:Russia wants to play by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I said, "Ya dirty dog!"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  26. http://www.smoseoservices.in/blog/best-web-design- by SmoSeoSem · · Score: 0

    Best web design company in india ,The universe of web is swung in to little worldwide town with its trend setting innovations. Site a need for each business and individuals are begun picking planning and advancement, which makes an incredible worldwide presentation for your business image with flourishing rivalry. These days, having a practical site is an essential for a business, as it fortifies to connect with more potential crowds, catching a more extensive market and changing over guests into clients. http://www.smoseoservices.in/b...

  27. Iran and Infowars at the same rough time? by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

    Poor Iranfowars! Always getting beat up.

    --
    Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
  28. Will they do something about the US/UK campaigns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they don't do anything against US/UK misinformation campaigns that just proves they are acting on behalf of said campaigns.

  29. I'll help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here you go.

    Oh oops, that wasn't fake news, only a reminder of the garbage humans that are paid to shit on forums. See the title of your response? That's trash from the gutter you just picked up and posted for everyone to see.

  30. Information campaigns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The key points here are 1. differentiating information campaigns and misinformation campaigns and 2. what to do about them.

    Information campaigns should not be stopped, even if they are done on behalf of a government or by government agencies.
    Misinformation campaigns should be labeled so and links to definite proof of why said information is untruthful should be attached.

    Anyone censoring others and claiming it was because it was misinformation is doing exactly what the Chinese government does.

  31. Sorry LYING FAGGOT 6-COCK-GUMMER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's at a 20 year low, sorry, you're a LYING FAGGOT GUMMER! :D

    1. Re:Sorry LYING FAGGOT 6-COCK-GUMMER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Progressivism" really is a cult, isn't it? Just look at this AC's cognitive dissonance as he struggles to reconcile reality with his religious beliefs. It's sad.

  32. Google Force and Facebook Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like the esteemed president has created two new armed forces to keep our minds safe from dirty commie and brown people propaganda. I for one welcome our new freedom overlords.

  33. Assassinate Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill the Satanic monster!

  34. Re:R A Y M O R R I S I S A L Y I N G F A G G O T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey if they come for your land and offer unreasonable or non-existent compensation it's not a problem; One can simply choose to get shot, get imprisoned, or starve to death after having their livelihood ripped away from them with the threat of government implemented violence. That seems fair. Don't you think so AC?