Slashdot Mirror


Read Two Of This Year's 2018 Hugh Award Winners Online (thehugoawards.org)

AmiMoJo quotes the Verge: The 2018 Hugo Awards were held Sunday night at the World Science Fiction Convention in San Jose, California. The Hugo award, voted on by members of the fan community, is considered the highest honour for science fiction and fantasy literature... N.K. Jemisin took home the top honor for The Stone Sky, the third installment of her Broken Earth trilogy. Other winners include Martha Wells for her first Murderbot novella All Systems Red, Suzanne Palmer for her novelette "The Secret Life of Bots," and Rebecca Roanhorse for her short story "Welcome to your Authentic Indian Experience." [Those last two links apparently let you read the entire story online!] Roanhorse also took home the John W. Campbell Jr. Award for Best New Writer.
Ursula K. Le Guin also posthumously won an award for "Best Related Work" for her collection of blog posts No Time to Spare: Thinking About What Matters.

And Zack Snyder finally won something, when Blade Runner 2049 lost in the "Best Dramatic Presentation -- Long Form" category to Wonder Woman ("screenplay by Allan Heinberg, story by Zack Snyder & Allan Heinberg and Jason Fuch.")

12 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. LOL diversity indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So now they are only awarding women with the Hugh award, whatever it is?
    They think that will somehow push readers to read their shitty fan fiction.
    Instead the Hugh award will become irrelevant as people learn that it doesn't mean anything and the books are just as shit with that little label on it.

    1. Re:LOL diversity indeed by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So now they are only awarding women with the Hugh award, whatever it is?

      It's been that way since the SJW's took over the Hugos and most of the big publications (like Asimov's Science Fiction) years ago. It's a warning of what can happen if you let the SJW cancer get even a foothold in your hobby. White males need not apply.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:LOL diversity indeed by thesupraman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sexist much?

      Or do you really believe that? In which case I can only assume that upper management of large businesses is also a pure meritocracy, and women are just not doing well at it at present?

      It would be easier to defend that position than yours... (and I dont agree with either FWIW)

  2. Hugo award is worthless by rossz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Hugo Award become irrelevant a few years ago when they chose to put virtue signaling above the quality of the stories.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re: Hugo award is worthless by Camembert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you actually READ the winning trilogy?

    2. Re:Hugo award is worthless by SuilAmhain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh Christ this. That N.K. Jemisin book reads like a high school junior English essay. It's absolutely awful.

      Rewind to 2016: If Seveneves, or Ancillary Mercy could not beat that author in 2016 there is something right wrong.

      I tried Hugo awards finalists for the final time in 2017.
      - Becky Chambers, reads like a teenage diary.
      - N.K. Jemisin still reads like a high school junior English essay.
      - The Liu books are pure waffle.

      WTF is wrong with these aware ceremonies?

  3. Re: Hugo Award == Twitter Blue Checkmark by Camembert · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Have you actually READ the winning trilogy? I read lots of SF and found it remarkably well crafted.

  4. Re:Diversity by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, Issac Asimov, Fredrik Pohl, Phillip K. Dick, Arthur C. Clarke...all secretly had vaginas. Best kept secret in the industry.

    It's hard to believe that AmiMoJo believes even a fraction of his own bullshit anymore. Looking at the Hugos, you would think that white men just up and decided to stop writing science fiction in the 21st century. Of course, we all know that's not what really happened.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  5. Re:Diversity by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They should try harder, then.

    That's only going to work if by "try harder" you mean "get gender reassignment surgery."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. I have no side here by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sad puppies , sjw, dragon, happy puppies whatever. I am an avid reader of sf, as in at my peak I was reading 8 books a week, now less due to work/friends. I only care whether the story is good. *some* of the Hugo from 2017 or 2018 I find so bad as to wonder why they were nominated. That bot story for example I rolled my eye.

    Nomination should never be based on race,skin, gender but on SF quality of writing skills and on story content quality mostly. If that means no white man or no non white women win, so be it. It isn't about gender/race author equality but all about SF quality. And while some Hugo were in the last year of high quality, many were so poor like that bot story that I wondered WHY the fuck they were nominated.

    No it could be a misguided attempt at equality outcome as some pretend, or it could be there were no author worth nominating, or simply that the Hugo are being mismanaged. Whichever , Hugo are simply not a good indicator of SF in the last years.

    An alternative explanation by the way is that "us" of the older generation expect some type of content, and the hugo is geared toward a newer generation expecting other type of content. If that's the case, in a few year/a decade SF is going to suck and blow ass.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  7. Re:Diversity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Moving the goalposts again. Now your requirement is an award for an individual work that had nothing to do with women at all... Because that's a rational standard to judge an award for creativity by.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. to explore brave new worlds, but uh...whites only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    New experiences and perspectives are what the genre's all about, so it's really depressing to see how resistant a lot of avowed sci-fi fans are to experience some difference in the actual human perspective behind the fiction.

    Jemisin's books are good. They weren't entirely my cup of tea in some ways but not every book has to be exactly for me. I recognize that they were creative, well-written, and explored interesting concepts from angles I hadn't thought of before. Worthy of a Hugo for sure.

    The three-in-a-row? Seemed a little much, but at the same time, if there was some small element of "hey, the author is a black woman" thrown into the reasoning process, so be it. For more than half of the Hugo's history, whether subconsciously or otherwise, I feel pretty sure there was at least a small element of "hey, the author is a white guy, like me and every one else handing out the awards." I'd love for everything to be perfectly objective too, but don't bullshit yourself that it ever will be or could be with humans at the wheel. The best we can hope to do is average our biases out over time.

    Overall, if this sort of thing draws a more diverse set of people into the field of sci-fi/fantasy that's worth the small bias. Which again, was gonna be there anyway in one flavor or another. The best qualities of the genre involve exploring new concepts, and while part of that is hard science or exploring crazy made-up worlds and technologies or whatever else, one quality that is rare but that I've found very fascinating is when you can tell the author's experiences and worldview are significantly different than yours. Cixin Liu's work is a great example. The purely science-fictional elements of his stories are great, but seeing them drawing from a purely Chinese background and experience added a fascinating extra layer.

    Jemisin's books have that same layer for me and I want more good non-white non-male authored books. And I am a white male. So stop crying that every god damn thing that doesn't fit your narrow worldview, taste, whatever, is a dire conspiracy. Has there ever been a point in recent history where the people bitching about how awful it is that is being treated too well ever ended up looking like anything but miserable pricks?