Slashdot Mirror


Read Two Of This Year's 2018 Hugh Award Winners Online (thehugoawards.org)

AmiMoJo quotes the Verge: The 2018 Hugo Awards were held Sunday night at the World Science Fiction Convention in San Jose, California. The Hugo award, voted on by members of the fan community, is considered the highest honour for science fiction and fantasy literature... N.K. Jemisin took home the top honor for The Stone Sky, the third installment of her Broken Earth trilogy. Other winners include Martha Wells for her first Murderbot novella All Systems Red, Suzanne Palmer for her novelette "The Secret Life of Bots," and Rebecca Roanhorse for her short story "Welcome to your Authentic Indian Experience." [Those last two links apparently let you read the entire story online!] Roanhorse also took home the John W. Campbell Jr. Award for Best New Writer.
Ursula K. Le Guin also posthumously won an award for "Best Related Work" for her collection of blog posts No Time to Spare: Thinking About What Matters.

And Zack Snyder finally won something, when Blade Runner 2049 lost in the "Best Dramatic Presentation -- Long Form" category to Wonder Woman ("screenplay by Allan Heinberg, story by Zack Snyder & Allan Heinberg and Jason Fuch.")

9 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Diversity by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This isn't good. All the winners were from the same gender. When with diversity come to science fiction? AmiMoJo please help us.

    1. Re:Diversity by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't worry, you can always go look at the nominees for the Dragon Awards and find some actual decent Science Fiction. The "Hugh" awards are basically dead, more an indicator of what not to read now, at least if you're an SF fan, rather than a literary SJW.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:Diversity by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      But the more important thing is that there isn't an obvious systemic problem here. If there was you know I'd be first to point it out. This year is exceptional.

      No white men have won a Hugo in anything, save for the "dramatic presentation" category, in years.

      So I guess 2017 was an exceptional year too.
      http://www.thehugoawards.org/h...

      And so was 2016.
      http://www.thehugoawards.org/h...

      And at last, we have ONE white guy in 2015 (for best novelette). And the only reason he won was because there was an open rebellion among the fans demanding it:
      https://www.wired.com/2015/08/...
      Of course, that didn't stop the Hugo committee from responding to the rebellion by refusing to issue awards for most of the other nominees:
      http://www.thehugoawards.org/h...

      Should I go on, or are you still going to pretend that white guys have a snowball's chance in hell of winning a Hugo anymore?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Diversity by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Peter Newman for a fancast co-hosted by a woman
      Michael Damian Thomas part of a group award for a magazine edited by a woman with other women writers
      Terry McDonough Best Dramatic Presentation which, as I mentioned, is the only category men are still allowed to win
      Hawk Ostby Best Dramatic Presentation which, as I mentioned, is the only category men are still allowed to win
      Mark Fergus Best Dramatic Presentation which, as I mentioned, is the only category men are still allowed to win
      Denis Villeneuve Best Dramatic Presentation and co-authored by an Asian
      Eric Heisserer Best Dramatic Presentation and co-authored by an Asian

      Did you really think *I* wouldn't check?

      Tell me, AmiMoJo, do you even believe your own SJW bullshit anymore, or are you just in too deep now to change sides?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Re:Hugh Awards? by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you read the two short stories you will realize it is more like "Hugh Mistake".

  3. LOL diversity indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So now they are only awarding women with the Hugh award, whatever it is?
    They think that will somehow push readers to read their shitty fan fiction.
    Instead the Hugh award will become irrelevant as people learn that it doesn't mean anything and the books are just as shit with that little label on it.

    1. Re:LOL diversity indeed by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So now they are only awarding women with the Hugh award, whatever it is?

      It's been that way since the SJW's took over the Hugos and most of the big publications (like Asimov's Science Fiction) years ago. It's a warning of what can happen if you let the SJW cancer get even a foothold in your hobby. White males need not apply.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Hugo award is worthless by rossz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Hugo Award become irrelevant a few years ago when they chose to put virtue signaling above the quality of the stories.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  5. I have no side here by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sad puppies , sjw, dragon, happy puppies whatever. I am an avid reader of sf, as in at my peak I was reading 8 books a week, now less due to work/friends. I only care whether the story is good. *some* of the Hugo from 2017 or 2018 I find so bad as to wonder why they were nominated. That bot story for example I rolled my eye.

    Nomination should never be based on race,skin, gender but on SF quality of writing skills and on story content quality mostly. If that means no white man or no non white women win, so be it. It isn't about gender/race author equality but all about SF quality. And while some Hugo were in the last year of high quality, many were so poor like that bot story that I wondered WHY the fuck they were nominated.

    No it could be a misguided attempt at equality outcome as some pretend, or it could be there were no author worth nominating, or simply that the Hugo are being mismanaged. Whichever , Hugo are simply not a good indicator of SF in the last years.

    An alternative explanation by the way is that "us" of the older generation expect some type of content, and the hugo is geared toward a newer generation expecting other type of content. If that's the case, in a few year/a decade SF is going to suck and blow ass.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org