Slashdot Mirror


Original Chromebook Pixel Reaches End of Life (droid-life.com)

Deathlizard writes: The original 2013 Chromebook Pixel, Google's $1200, Core i5 vision of a high end Chromebook, has reached End of Life. Owners are receiving a message that their device is no longer supported.

71 comments

  1. Linux by SumDog · · Score: 1

    Time to put something useful on it, like Linux

    1. Re:Linux by Phylter9086 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was just thinking of how many computer that I have much older than this that still run the latest Windows, Linux, MacOS. It makes it seem like ChromeOS isn't worth $1200.

    2. Re: Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, I buy a device from Apple once in a blue moon and they are supported with the latest OS for many years, then with security updates for many more years. I just upgraded to a 2018 model at home, from a 2009 model. I may be paying a premium but in the long run between the reduced frustration and the long use life of their products Apple ends up being cost efficient for me.

    3. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "GNU/Linux" since it already runs (a) linux (kernel).

    4. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to put something useful on it, like Linux

      It already has Linux on it.

    5. Re:Linux by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Time to put something useful on it, like Linux

      Quite. This laptop is from 2010. It's previous OSs (ubuntu 9.04 then 12.04) have been EOL'd and I'll reinstall when this OS reaches EOL id the laptop survives that long. It probably will.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  2. Poor support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people put up with this? I use an i7 older than that, and because it's not a Chromebook, I can still get automatic updates.

    1. Re:Poor support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a Pentium III 500 MHz, still supported by FreeDOS.

    2. Re: Poor support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you clocked lemmings yet?

  3. It is the duty of all good Citizens by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is the duty of all good Citizens to be terrorized by the urge to buy newer, shinier gadgets when your Corporate Masters decide they need another yacht.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:It is the duty of all good Citizens by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Some significant percentage of the original Chromebook Pixels were given away for free at Google events or to developers. It was speculated at the time that the sale price didn't include any profit, it was just an at-cost device designed to encourage influential people/devs to take up the platform.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Google should unlock the bootloader. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

    Google should unlock the bootloader once the devices reach EOL. Even if the original OS is no longer supported, the hardware is still good, and can run a supported Linux distribution.

    1. Re:Google should unlock the bootloader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google should do a lot of things. At some point the blame shifts from Google for not doing them to their users and customers for not boycotting Google.

    2. Re:Google should unlock the bootloader. by viperidaenz · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not locked, so they can't unlock it. You just need to boot into developer mode and turn off OS verification.

      They also tell you how to install Linux
      https://www.chromium.org/a/chr...

      Here's an guide to install Ubuntu 18
      https://www.servethehome.com/g...

    3. Re:Google should unlock the bootloader. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      You also have to take off the back and remove the write protect screw if you want to use MrChromebox's UEFI firmware (which you really should).

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    4. Re:Google should unlock the bootloader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google should unlock the bootloader once the devices reach EOL. Even if the original OS is no longer supported, the hardware is still good, and can run a supported Linux distribution.

      Since ChromeOS is the operating system and it is based on the Linux kernel, why is there an end of life for any Chromebook beyond physically wearing out? The whole point of the Chromebook is to have the web browser, namely Google Chrome, be the UI and the "operating system" with a minimum of firmware necessary to boot the UI.

    5. Re:Google should unlock the bootloader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put my chromebook into developer mode once; everytime I turned it on I had to sit through a countdown explaining the dangers of stepping outside the Google fence and begging me to press a key to wipe out the freedom infection and return to safety of the fence.

    6. Re:Google should unlock the bootloader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine has a Chromebook that he decided to use for a Linux machine. So he undid the write-protect for the firmware, overrode that with a UEFI bootloader following instructions he found online from Arch's wiki and put the screw back in. Now it boots just fine, has no warnings about developer mode, the rescue environment is truly read-only, and other benefits.

  5. Only Slacker Tech by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    Consider a tech product reaching end of life support, mind you not just for upgrades but for bugs and security fixes. So what they are really saying, yeah, we know it has been a whole bunch years and we still haven't got all the bugs out of it and it still sort of mostly works but 'er' fuck off any how and buy another computer that will still mostly work, that contains bugs and security holes and that we will also stop trying to fix in some number of years time. Tech because we don't give a shit if our products don't ever fully function properly and securely as long as you keep paying to much for them. You would think patching and bug fixing should last until they finally make it work 100% but on no, near enough and fuck off and buy another one.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re: Only Slacker Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the complete underlying definition of Apple thanks for making it known

    2. Re:Only Slacker Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet owners will not switch to liGnux - GNU/Linux -, and no company would offer to buy them at a low cost, install liGnux and sell them for an extra price.

      It is a free market, but not so perfect one as some like to teach - or brain wash -

    3. Re:Only Slacker Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
      Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
      Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

  6. 5 years and out? by layabout · · Score: 1, Funny

    man, my T430 is older than that (and has more ram, m2 ssd and 1tb ssr (slowly spinning rust). still going strong.

    1. Re:5 years and out? by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      And that T430 cost just as much, if not cheaper than the pixel.

      Back when the Pixel was announced, I posted this. Basically, I said it was unsellable and was "Light money on Fire stupid"

      Five years later, that statement still stands. If you bought one of these things, You basically paid $250/Year for a portable web browser. You could have bought a brand new chromebook every year and saved money.

      The fact that Google stuck with their five year software support model for a system this expensive that clearly has hardware more than capable enough to support whatever new features come out of ChromeOS is a testament to stay as far away from these high end chromebooks as you can.

  7. Re: Pre-planned obsolescence is a NIGHTMARE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If what you say is true youâ(TM)ve only bought two or three laptops in your life.

    Anyway a 2003 laptop is not really usable-and Iâ(TM)m speaking as someone who updated Linux on a 10 year old laptop just a few hours ago.

  8. Spectre / Meltdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you patch for spectre / meltdown if google has the boot loader locked? If you cannot patch for those, why do anything other than recycle it?

  9. EOL after 5 years? Time machine works!!! by BLToday · · Score: 1

    I’m back in the 1990s. First thing, buy as many three letter domains as possible. Then buy as much Apple stock as possible. Oh yeah, tell Clinton to kill bin Laden.

    I have Windows laptops that older that still gets OS updates. And until High Sierra, my wife’s ancient 2008 MacBook was still getting the latest version of MacOS. My desktop is almost that old and it’s perfectly functional.

    1. Re:EOL after 5 years? Time machine works!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sold my 2013 Pixel over a year ago when there was a delay the release of the Android app feature for it. I figured it was no longer the Google darling. I was right. A Chromebook that has been unlocked to run other software (Linux) is no longer a secure platform, the main/only feature of a Chromebook. Also, my 2009 iMac has probably had its last software update, but still runs well, not perfectly, but well. macOS High Sierra runs on it, but it has had problems since El Capitan with USB after a restart. I deleted my Windows 10 partition under Boot Camp when getting it to boot at all became a problem. I've given up on Apple computers and will be getting a Windows laptop when I need a new one. Software for my hobby is just not on macOS.

  10. Remember when it was "ATARI 2600 reaches End of Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course not. Because once upon a time it was considered impressive to build formidable products, and it was a disgrace when they failed early. Now people pay extra just to rent some already-doomed piece of equipment.

    Disgusting.

  11. Five Years?? by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's pathetic. I just retired the last of my XP machines from 2005/6 a few years ago, and my Win 7 machines are humming along nicely.

    If they want to be taken seriously, they need a longer support cycle. Up until now, I thought they had a great ecosystem. My son uses Chromebooks at his school, and everything there is cloud based.

    But, five years??

    1. Re:Five Years?? by viperidaenz · · Score: 0

      You XP machine hasn't been getting automatic updates for 9 years now.
      These Chromebooks will still continue to function, they just won't get automatic updates.
      They also provide instructions on how to install Linux.

    2. Re:Five Years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP got updates until 2014.

    3. Re:Five Years?? by itsme1234 · · Score: 2

      You XP machine hasn't been getting automatic updates for 9 years now.

      That is absolute bullshit. In 2009 they were still making new machines (completely new models) with/for XP like the legendary 9.5 hours EEE Pc 1000HE (yes, the battery is still pretty strong). XP got updates until 2014 and this can be trivially (one registry key) extended to 2019 (yes, they are still pushing updates for XP). Even without the registry "hack" Microsot still patched all XPs with the mega-emergency KB4012598 - that was last year, yes 2017.

    4. Re:Five Years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP got updates until 2014.

      XP will continue to get updates through 2019 if you set this registry key:

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMWPAPosReady]
      "Installed"=dword:00000001

    5. Re:Five Years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\WPA\PosReady]
      "Installed"=dword:00000001

    6. Re:Five Years?? by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      The XP machines were supported until April 8, 2014. After that we had two years extended support. I got rid of 900 of them in 2016. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/search?alpha=Microsoft%20Windows%20XP%20Service%20Pack%202

    7. Re:Five Years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft.... 2006? Get off my lawn. I still have an Atari 1040ST w/ hand-solder 4MB RAM upgrade my parents and I used during my childhood. Originally bought in 1986. Still runs great. Other than the color monitor needing to be repaired once or twice it still runs great.

      Support is another thing entirely. I keep calling and they never call me back.

    8. Re:Five Years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP with Service Packs applied does not need to be updated. The user of the PC is given nothing if value by the updates, and they should never be allowed.
      We have Win8 and Win10 without windows update, and as long as we use an adblocker and javascript blocker we will never have any problems.

      And, all our Windows systems still have the same performance and lack of problems as they did when we got them brand new!

    9. Re:Five Years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Security Essentials just stopped working on Vista. So checking stuff I download is out of the picture? It is also nice that they removed any Information or Tools regarding Vista from their Homepage.

  12. Expensive paperweight. by renegadesx · · Score: 2

    Buying a new phone every 4 or 5 years make sense, new tower frequencies in your area, new features but even now that is becoming less and less necessary. 5g will be the next time a new phone is necessary. This however is a joke.
    The Pixel was not even a cheap machine, why anyone would pay that much for a Chromebook is beyond me, the entire point of Chromebook's were that it was so lightweight that it could run on ultra-cheap hardware.
    Now 5 years later it's an expensive paperweight? Has anyone got Manjaro running on one of these?

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
    1. Re:Expensive paperweight. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      Many flavours of Linux run on it.
      Here's the latest Ubuntu https://www.servethehome.com/g...

      Not only is the bootloader unlockable, it's also opensource.
      You're not restricted in any way with what you can do with the hardware. You just won't get any more automatic Chrome OS updates.
      coreboot source: https://chromium.googlesource....
      uboot source: https://chromium.googlesource....

      Name another laptop manufacturer with entirely open source boot code.

    2. Re:Expensive paperweight. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      So do Windows 8.1 and Windows 10, so long as you flash the firmware.

      If you're worried your Pixel is a paperweight, I'll trade you a pre-flashed Acer C720 for it.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    3. Re:Expensive paperweight. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It runs Linux well because Linus bought one back in the day and fixed all the issues with it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  13. Devolution by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    If Google were responsible it would provide instructions and make it easy to install Windows or Linux instead of telling it's users to fuck off. Nothing even remotely obsolete about an i5 laptop. Expecting people to just throw away perfectly fine hardware is sleazy.

    Years ago I could almost buy argument why chefs were needed to bake roms for specific devices due to severe resource constraints. Today there are no credible excuses. It's absurd this nonsense is allowed to continue. Worse the problem appears to be growing into PC space where "security" is wielded as an excuse to fuck over / scare end users.

    1. Re:Devolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expecting people to just throw away perfectly fine hardware is sleazy.

      Google == Advertising == Sleazy. Check!

    2. Re:Devolution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Windows, no, why would you want to install Windows on a 32GB SSD?
      Linux, yes.
      Friendly guide: https://www.servethehome.com/g...
      Google instructions: https://www.chromium.org/a/chr...

    3. Re:Devolution by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Windows, no, why would you want to install Windows on a 32GB SSD?
      Linux, yes.

      It's not about me. Wouldn't go anywhere near a chromebook in the first place.

    4. Re:Devolution by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Windows has to be shoehorned into a 16 GB SSD with extreme difficulty, and there won't be enough space to download updates so it becomes unmanageable pretty quickly, but 32 GB is enough. Add a fast SD card and/or a Samsung Fit drive (I can't recommend the SanDisk Fit, it overheats and disconnects when writing for more than fifteen seconds or so) for data and application installation, and you'll be set.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    5. Re:Devolution by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      No overheating problem with a 64 GB SanDisk Ultra Fit on my HP Stream 11. It gets warm, but definitely not hot. And it doesn't seem to be any slower than the internal eMMC.

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    6. Re:Devolution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Add a fast SD card and/or a Samsung Fit drive (I can't recommend the SanDisk Fit, it overheats and disconnects when writing for more than fifteen seconds or so) for data and application installation, and you'll be set.

      What you want is a Samsung Evo+, they have the best random read performance. Sandisk devices tend to have garbage random read performance. Yes, random READ performance, garbage, on a flash drive. I don't know how they managed that either, but I've done the benchmarking, and I know it's true. It made a dramatic difference on my Pine64+.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Devolution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      A 32GB Asus Transformer barely fits Windows 10 and a few kids games on it.
      It was extremely painful to install the Creators Update, as there wasn't enough free space.

    8. Re:Devolution by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You should be fine with any A1 rated SD card.

    9. Re:Devolution by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      The reason I recommend the Fit is its physical size. It's small enough that you never have to remove it unless you need that USB 3 port for something else (hopefully a hub). Anything larger has to be removed when putting the laptop in a bag for travel, and risks catching it on something the rest of the time. To me, any flash drive that can't be left in all the time without exposure to damage is for sneakernet and cold storage only.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    10. Re:Devolution by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      I ordered one (though 128 GB) and experienced the connect/disconnect problem immediately. It appears to affect about 50% of them, and I didn't want to roll the dice over a few dollars of difference in price, so I went with the Samsung Fit the second time around. The Samsung proved to be slightly faster in every way: 150+ MB/s sequential reads, sequential writes vary by the amount of power the host is willing to throw at them but it's about 45 MB/s on the Chromebook, and 130 MB/s on the desktop which will happily give it all the current it wants. Holy shit does it get hot when doing sustained 130 MB/s writes, but it doesn't disconnect when it takes cooldown breaks the way the SanDisk does. It just slows to almost zero speed for a second or two.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  14. soon to be illegal in Europe by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    It looks like our friends in Europe will soon make illegal the wasteful, environmentally irresponsible, & abusive practice of planned obsolescence.

    Alas, our Congress finds lawful bribery far too lucrative to be bothered with protecting the people or from abusive corporations.

    1. Re: soon to be illegal in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy for Europe. They do not make, they do not invent, they do not innovate. They just tax, fine and punish. The best course of action is to ignore them. Yes, it's a big market but it will still be a big market when they finally go under in a few years. :)

  15. XP ended support in 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows XP support ended in 2009.

    You know that Samsung Dex outsells Chromebooks, and yet bizarrely Google docs don't work on it in any browser (Firefox Chrome or Samsung Internet).
    IMHO, this is by design not by accident. They are not so incompetent that they cannot support a browser correctly if the string says 'dex' and some of the errors are clearly by design (e.g. fails to send a style sheet).

    So they cannot support machines from 5 years ago with patches? Well they cannot support modern Android stuff running now!

    1. Re:XP ended support in 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're using Firefox or Chrome then why can't you use the User-Agent Switcher extension?

  16. Re: Pre-planned obsolescence is a NIGHTMARE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does it do? Who for? Why?

    I was able to supply an acquaintance with an ~800MHz Celeron laptop w/ 256MB RAM, 800x600 screen on integrated graphics, and that thing would -plow- through more than 1,000 games(emu/or). Windows 2000(stripped and optimized), XBCD. Doesn't even have a modem, let alone ethernet or wifi. PCMCIA for that stuff!

    A 2003 laptop is still valuable in some regards, even if it is just in valuable metals recycling. If it functions, there is plenty you can do with it. use some imagination, a scratch of knowledge and research, you can make that laptop into a proto-arcade cabinet, a serious router/firewall/access point or just an email and messaging machine.

    Youtube, Facebook, well, that's -most all-, yeah it won't work well/at all on something of that age. all that means is that you gotta MAKE IT for its purpose and understand what it just is not able to do(or sometimes skirt with some serious workarounds). Such as, for an example, extra 25-40$ you can create a dedicated PLEX server out of a Pi or some such computer-on-a-board system and just stream what you want to that machine.

    TL;DR -- "Usable" is completely subjective and a poor way to describe a computer without more following subjective information.

    CAPTCHA: doubts

  17. Open source not much better by xack · · Score: 1

    Look how many Linux distros are dropping 32bit support for example. People just want the latest shiny thing while perfectly functioning machines get trashed.

    1. Re:Open source not much better by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      It makes sense for mainstream distros to drop 32bit, especially the main server distros as there are few if any 32bit machines still being built.

      Support for 64bit on linux is very mature, and the open source nature of the vast majority of applications means that everything has long ago been recompiled so you're not stuck with legacy 32bit binaries.

      32bit should be relegated to embedded and legacy niches.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Open source not much better by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Open source not much better

      No, Open Source really is much better.

      Look how many Linux distros are dropping 32bit support for example.

      This is one of those things that qualifies as "not even wrong".

      Firstly 32 bit hardware is getting increasingly rare, and for general desktop, laptop and server use the 32 bit processors were discontinued way way before 2013.

      Secondly, unbuntu no longer provides a desktop 32 bit x86 image for ubuntu 18.04, though you can install it. So your 32 bit processor will be supported through t0 2023 for that OS.

      Arch has discontinued 32 bit x86 support, but because it's OSS, the Arch32 project lives on.

      Fedora has no 32 bit server images, but they're a business oriented distro and I doubt you'll find anyone running 32 bit x86 servers. It's a financially bad idea.

      Debian still support it with no plans for EOL.

      And a whole bunch of more obscure ones.

      And 32 bit ARM continues to be supported too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  18. certainly the hardware isn't 'out of date' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google just killed the "premium" chrome book market.

    why spend on a high-end processor (that isn't really needed anyway) only to see it get kicked to the curb after a measly 5 years... hardware still way faster and more capable than what's in the crap sold in stores *today*.

    google is just cheap lazy bastards. they buy hardware designed and built by the lowest chinese bidder regardless of whether it creates too much fragmentation within their hardware lineup to reasonably be able to provide updates for long-term.

    five years for a glorified touch screen and keyboard is a fucking joke. 15 years, minimum, is what it should be supported for.

  19. Support is not even 4 years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We just bought a Lenovo 300e Chromebook. I just found out it is out of support in june 2022. Thus in less than four years this device will get unsecure very soon without updates? I think we will return the system to the store and just buy a more expensive laptop with good Linux support.
    It is strange that this Chromebook is just released: there are not even any real product reviews yet. So based on the Google support policies it should receive support at least until june 2023. The 500e was released at the same time but gets support until Nov 2023. Thus Google and Lenovo are effectively only supporting the more expensive devices somewhat longer?

  20. Stuff updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't worth the headache. I wish I could end of life updates on my goddamn win 10 machines. The extra protection isn't worth the pain of constant updates and things that once worked well slowing down and breaking altogether.

    I'd say this is a feature that makes the Chromebook more attractive, not less. Click "don't remind me again" and no more headaches till the machine dies.

    1. Re:Stuff updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you run Chrome or Firefox on a Windows machine that doesn't update, the browser still auto-updates. Which is THE attack surface, and the browser upgrades are eventually necessary for crypto, not suffering misbehaving pages (fucking youtube!), or even sites that lock you out (google earth?). There'll be the upgrade to AV1 codec, though I expect illegal streaming sites to serve H264 360p for a long time. (as well as youtube and most everything)

      You don't really need updates to a text editor, a word processor, a video or audio player (these days anyway), you need them for an OS but not that much maybe. For a browser? You got to be kidding me, and Chromebook is 99% browser.

    2. Re:Stuff updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't really need updates to a text editor, a word processor, a video or audio player (these days anyway), you need them for an OS but not that much maybe. For a browser? You got to be kidding me, and Chromebook is 99% browser.

      I have an Acer Chromebook 13 which I use exclusively as a web terminal to access hosted applications such as RStudio Cloud and Google Suite, mostly Google Drive and Google Mail, plus all of my bookmarks. This notebook is slightly heavier than my Hewlett Packard Spectre 13 but is perfect when I have to take a notebook computer to a meeting or hackathon.

  21. Fine by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    If Google is going to turn it into abandonware, they should provide software to unlock it and allow people to run whatever operating system they can get to install and run on it.