Slashdot Mirror


Popular College Majors Changed Abruptly After the Financial Crisis (qz.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Ten years have passed since the 2008 financial crisis, and the effects linger. For one thing, the crisis produced a significant shift in American higher education. Scared by a seemingly treacherous labor market, since the downturn college students have turned away from the humanities and towards job-oriented degrees. It's not clear they are making the right decision. The humanities were humming along prior to 2008, according to an analysis by the Northeastern University historian Benjamin Schmidt. Over the previous decade, disciplines like history, philosophy, English literature, and religion were either growing or holding steady as a share of all college majors. But in the decade after the financial crisis, all of these majors took a nosedive. The popularity of the history major is an illustrative example. From 1998 to 2007, the share of college students graduating with a degree in history averaged around 2%. By 2017, it had fallen closer to 1%. (All data in this article are based on reports that colleges submit to the US Department of Education.) Other humanities majors saw a similar fall. "Declines have hit almost every field in the humanities... and related social sciences," wrote Schmidt in the The Atlantic. "[T]hey have not stabilized with the economic recovery, and they appear to reflect a new set of student priorities, which are being formed even before they see the inside of a college classroom."

26 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. The humanities strike back by Evtim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oooh, so that was the reason....people got wind of the uselessness of (most of) those degrees (especially the WAY they are taught), enrolment decreased, and the response of the humanities was.....the insane politicking and the march against logic, reason, knowledge, discipline, learning, critical thinking, diversity of opinion, open mindedness, freedom of thought and speech....etc.

    Figures!

    1. Re:The humanities strike back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      credentialing /= job training /= education

      Hardly anybody has the education to understand that, although people generally do know where the money is.

    2. Re:The humanities strike back by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We need the humanities, but prior to the financial crisis it seemed to me that it was already widely accepted that we had far more graduates in those fields than we needed, and that the vast majority of them were thus incapable of putting their degree to good use. While enrollment may be half of what it was prior to the crisis, that doesn't necessarily mean there's a problem. If anything, I'm inclined to think that the market has corrected itself and that today's supply of graduates is closer to actual demand for people in those fields.

    3. Re:The humanities strike back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My first computer teacher was the school's drama teacher. He was also the last computer teacher, as none had anything to teach after that, and I ended up in the physical sciences and a career in numerical computing. If you had an interest in science or engineering, the degree doesn't matter that much. If you didn't have an interest, no degree should even be possible. It is though in the humanities, which makes the bulk of their product so useless and insufferable.

    4. Re:The humanities strike back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You hit the proverbial nail on the head, with one caveat: the wrong type of student is what entered college to begin with, if this is the common behavior. And it is.

      The fact that STEM course avoidance due to difficulty is a thing that exists in college, is very telling of America, just how much society loathes, actual intelligence and an educated populace. / casual American here...

      The often uttered "I'll never use this" in real life from my peers, was something I could only shake my head at. As if they know what fate awaits them for this life...

      Chance does favor the prepared mind! It astonishes me that sentiment gets lost on so many people.

    5. Re:The humanities strike back by krygny · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe they want to learn some skills for which someone would be willing to pay them. So's they can put their six-figure debt behind them and start life before they're 40. Not that a rich and broadly diverse education doesn't have value, in and of itself, but with a little sweat equity, it can be gotten for no money down. These are usually referred to as personal interests or pursuits, not marketable skills. The world has just gotten lousy with psychologists, sociologist and "journalists". GEEZ, everybody is fucking journalist, in case you haven't noticed.

      Of course, it's not easy. In STEM, there is generally only one right answer to any problem. Most of the rest are wrong. Under the softer "sciences", there are almost no wrong answers. Unless the professor doesn't like it. So, don't pick that answer.

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    6. Re:The humanities strike back by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And yet liberal arts majors are the first to peer down their noses with intellectual superiority.

      You must be new here.

  2. Color me shocked by Vermonter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So degrees that were never big money makers in the first place are now huge financial losses since the economy has taken a hit, so people are avoiding them?

    >It's not clear they are making the right decision.

    I mean, if by "right decision" you mean "not bankrupting themselves", then I'd say it's quite obvious they are making the right decision to skip out on these humanities degrees.

    1. Re:Color me shocked by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the financial crisis highlighted to a lot of people that maybe they are not in the right financial class to be pursuing degrees with little to no market value. I wouldn't call the liberal arts "useless" in a greater metaphysical sense, I like art, I like a good story, I appreciate skillful use of language, and good poetry speaks to the soul. But except for a very small number of people who possess great talent, it is difficult to monetize the degree; it remains primarily a way of expanding your knowledge, it is primarily a luxury. That and a dime won't buy you coffee.

      So for the largest portion of population they are seeing college degrees in the liberal arts in the same way that most of us look at athletics: something to pursue if you are born with the right genes and you spend your entire life maximizing that potential. If you do not, you won't make it.

      Once upon a time universities were primarily for the very rich, with a few of the less wealthy brought in because their tremendous talent was recognized. The idle wealthy were basically paying the way for a few very gifted people. In the past 50 years, that has changed and most people can find a way to attend a university if they want to, but they need the degree they earn to pay for it, and to acquire a career that justifies the time. They basically cannot afford a luxury, they need to make an investment in their future. No sane person would argue that a humanities degree is a good investment in the future.

      I'm not sure this story is really all that exciting, except to a marketing dweeb to see where cultural changes are redirecting money.

  3. Also because employers care by DalM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was a time (you know, back in the baby boomer days) when having a college degree was meaningful. It really didn't matter what the major was. Employers saw a degree and found that to be indicative of a good potential employee.

    Today, college degrees aren't meaningless, they are a minimum expectation. Few
    entry level white color jobs don't have a college degree as a minimum requirement to even get your application a set of eyes. But it's not even just the degree anymore. Entry level job postings will require a degree in a related field. That typically nixes humanities. So, parents and high school councilors know this and discourage studying humanities.

    Honestly, I would discourage my children from studying humanities too.

  4. Re:Everyone wants a golden parachute by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    perhaps you should check out the fact the "tenure is dying", the percent of tenured professors has taken a nose-dive.

    College is big business, high paid employees are bad for the bottom line.

  5. Seems pretty clear to me by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not clear they are making the right decision

    How is it not clear that.a bunch of people turning away from History to study something they can use to get a job is the right choice?

    Sure history is important, but not to the degree that we need a TON of history majors.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  6. Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US perception of education is so broken its not about getting educated anymore it's about paying for a job placement. The conversation here is going to be nothing but how that imaginary pipeline is only served by technology focused disciplines. So what's the point of bringing it up at all as a conversation point. People here can't fathom why anyone would get a degree in history when there are bridges to be built and that's pretty fucking sad.

  7. Humanities degrees are anything but useless by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to a civilization. Contrary to popular thought you _can_ teach critical thinking. But you can't do it with Math. Math is too difficult a subject and there's no value in being 50% right.

    As for why you want people to learn critical thinking, well, what's one of the first things a fascist does when he seizes power? Even before he goes after guns? That's right, they crack down on the intelligentsia. Fascism can't exist in a country of critical thinkers. People see past the bullshit.

    As for why _you_ want to pay for the humanities (and with it a nation of critical thinkers), unless you get lucky and become one of the fascist's todies that doesn't get powerful enough to be killed (boy that's a fine line to walk, just ask anybody in the North Korea) then you're gonna be part of the working class. And do you really want to be part of the working class of a fascist dictatorship? Again, just ask anybody in NK...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Humanities degrees are anything but useless by Alypius · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And when the intelligensia become the fascists? People will see through that bullshit (and are), want to stop subsidizing it via taxes, and be called anti-intellectuals for their trouble.

    2. Re:Humanities degrees are anything but useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Critical thinkers from the humanities? LOL. Try the opposite. Fields that actively ignore the scientific method and rely on what "feels" right or what "looks" right when talking about their data are anything but critical thinkers. Please fuck all the way off with your uneducated bullshit kid.

    3. Re:Humanities degrees are anything but useless by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for why you want people to learn critical thinking, well, what's one of the first things a fascist does when he seizes power? Even before he goes after guns? That's right, they crack down on the intelligentsia. Fascism can't exist in a country of critical thinkers. People see past the bullshit.

      The self proclaimed intelligentsia look pretty dumb in light of safe spaces, shouting down others as a primary form of debate, and their love of double standards. They are pretty proud of themselves but the rest of the world holds them in contempt. They are not heirs to such lofty ideals as "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" or "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." As far as facism not existing among critical thinkers, you may have a point but universities are bastions of intolerance and group think so there is in fact a negative correlation between universities and ability to think critically.

    4. Re:Humanities degrees are anything but useless by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      but universities are bastions of intolerance and group think so there is in fact a negative correlation between universities and ability to think critically.

      My guess is that you're get your notion of what's happening on college campuses from critical thinkers like Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity. What was the last time you've been on a college campus or spoken to any university professor?

      They are not heirs to such lofty ideals as "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" or "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

      I bet you have no problem with lofty ideals such as telling people not to "monkey things up" by electing a black candidate.

      I don't listen to talk radio of any sort, I prefer to read my news. That said I pick from a variety of outlets including liberal ones like Yahoo news and international ones like BBC. I was on a college campus last week as my GF works on one. In fact she was considering what her shift should dress up as for Halloween this year (last year was all pirates) and one possibility was cowboys & indians. I discouraged her from it as someone, like yourself, would pitch a fit.

      I could care less if someone says Monkey as part of a phrase. I recall a friend of mine using the phrase "cheeky money" and getting in trouble for it once by a chip on her shoulder politically correct type because he once said it to a black girl. I think it was over reacting then and I still consider it over reacting now as he used the phrase for everyone not just her. When one can be as overt as saying cancel all white people and get a pass why would I care about a common phrase like monkey it up. What's good for the goose is good for the gander - or does that phrase offend someone too?

    5. Re:Humanities degrees are anything but useless by nicklikesfire · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Can I come to your house and scream at you about why my value system is great, and your value system is terrible? How about your job? Want to invite me along next time you go jogging or riding a bicycle so I can mock your religious views? Can I sit shotgun on your morning commute and berate you about your lifestyle choices? Care to have me preach about satanism at your local church?

      No? Are those safe spaces for you?

      You have a misunderstanding of the term safe spaces. It should be obvious by now that most people have plenty of "safe spaces". But, imagine you're a LGBTQ college kid who shares a 12' x 12' dorm room with a bigoted moron. Where do you go to get away from that.

      And I agree that shouting down others as a primary form of debate is awful, and all too common. But if you think it's somehow limited to liberal college kids, you must have a very narrow view of the world yourself.

    6. Re:Humanities degrees are anything but useless by TimMD909 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have a misunderstanding of the term safe spaces. It should be obvious by now that most people have plenty of "safe spaces". But, imagine you're a LGBTQ college kid who shares a 12' x 12' dorm room with a bigoted moron. Where do you go to get away from that.

      My suggestion would be to deal w/ the problem and sort shit out. If you can't handle dealing with one asshole without folding into a puddle, I've got terrible news for you: the world is filled with them.

      Your argument strikes me as a strawman. Pretty sure every single college in the country has a procedure for when two students living together need to be relocated. So what's your argument boil down to? It's difficult to switch roommates?

    7. Re:Humanities degrees are anything but useless by blindseer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can I come to your house and scream at you about why my value system is great, and your value system is terrible? How about your job? Want to invite me along next time you go jogging or riding a bicycle so I can mock your religious views? Can I sit shotgun on your morning commute and berate you about your lifestyle choices?

      A speaker coming to a campus, like Milo Yiannopoulos who had his speaking event canceled at a campus near me, is not screaming at me from the passenger seat in my car. These are people that reserved a space on a campus and if you don't like what they have to say then invite your own speaker. In fact I'd be fine if you hold up some placards outside the event. What should never be tolerated is violence in response or disrupting the event with noise making and screaming. If you want the freedom to share your views then you must tolerate those you oppose to speak as well.

      Care to have me preach about satanism at your local church?

      No? Are those safe spaces for you?

      I do feel that my church is a safe space. I suspect that if you ask nicely that you might actually be allowed to speak on satanism at the church, perhaps not during scheduled Sunday worship but the building is open to many diverse groups to meet, such as a local ham radio club that meets in their basement.

      You have a misunderstanding of the term safe spaces. It should be obvious by now that most people have plenty of "safe spaces". But, imagine you're a LGBTQ college kid who shares a 12' x 12' dorm room with a bigoted moron. Where do you go to get away from that.

      You get away from that by a complaint to the people that run the residence halls. They don't want to see those assigned a room together to get in fights and such so they will find another room. At a minimum they would be most likely willing to let someone out of the contract, I was able to do that because I was not happy in my room. It wasn't a roommate issue, just that the room was only 12x12.

      And I agree that shouting down others as a primary form of debate is awful, and all too common. But if you think it's somehow limited to liberal college kids, you must have a very narrow view of the world yourself.

      No, I'm pretty sure it's limited to liberal college kids. Most anyone else in college is too focused on doing their calculus and the rest just plain grew up.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  8. Re:Does this surprise anyone? by dszd0g · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Instead, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, students seem to have shifted their view of what they should be studying—in a largely misguided effort to enhance their chances on the job market."
    "Students aren’t fleeing degrees with poor job prospects. They’re fleeing humanities and related fields specifically because they think they have poor job prospects."
    "If the whole story were a market response to student debt and the Great Recession, students would have read the 2011 census report numbering psychology and communications among the fields with the lowest median earnings and fled from them. Or they would have noticed that biology majors make less than the average college graduate, and favored the physical sciences. Most 18-year-olds are not econometricians, and those that are were probably going to major in economics anyway."
    "But most of the differences are slight—well within the margins of error of the surveys."

    I think this is where Schmidt really messes up. Maybe some students are still not avoiding some of the bad economic choices, but I think after story after story of people who go bankrupt from choosing the wrong college degree and suffering from the college debts and being worse off financially than if they had gotten no degree at all, I think students listened to those stories.

    "The top-paying college majors earn $3.4 million more than the lowest-paying majors over a lifetime."
    Source:
    https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew...

    • 1 Computer Science
    • 2 Engineering
    • 18 Arts
    • 19 Graphic Design
    • 20 History
    • 21 English
    • 22 Social Services

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/s...

    Millions of dollars seems more than a "slight" difference to me.

    Schmidt left off a few important graphs: 1) The decline of humanities compared to the cost of college over time. 2) The average income by degree.

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
  9. Re: Maybe itâ(TM)s the cost? by nealric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The plural of anecdote is not data. However, I will share my counter example. I paid $35k a year for a philosophy degree back when that was about as expensive as schools got. Then went to law school, got a masters in tax law, and started at a six-figure job right after graduation during the worst part of the recession. Yes, it was very expensive ~$200k all in, but I paid my loans back within 5 years. I wouldn't change a thing.

    The problem is not majoring in humanities- it's going to school with no particular interest or plan for what you will do afterwards. I know people who majored in hard science and struggled afterwards. There's not much you can do with a B.S. in biology or physics career-wise, but nobody jokes about the uselessness of a biology degree. If you want to major in those subjects, you need a plan for what you will do afterwards.

  10. Dichotomy by JBMcB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's an interesting position to take. Humanities are required in the science and engineering fields - I had to take at least six classes of English, languages, arts or philosophy for my engineering degree.

    Now universities are eliminating math requirements from humanities curriculums. Because, apparently, structured critical thinking skills are not required in a rounded university education.

    At the very least make everyone take a statistics class. That's the one thing everyone seems to botch.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  11. Coming soon to STEM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A good student with a humanities degree has very marketable skills, particularly in language and communication. They can identify and rebut bad arguments, make convincing and valid arguments, and even make bad arguments sound convincing. These are commercially valuable skills. The problem isn't the "uselessness" of the subject matter expertise they accrue. Many of the programmers I know studied physics or math. My friends who studied electrical engineering? Coders. They haven't designed a chip since their honours project.

    When's the last time NP-completeness or Turing machines were relevant to the typical /.er's work? It's a rarefied few who put to use their knowledge of compiler or kernel design. Nevertheless, the skills learned in mastering those subjects are the reason they are able to analyse and solve analogous problems. The same goes for history majors. The true cause of the fall of the Roman empire is lost to time, if there ever was a "true cause". But the skills learned by formulating arguments pro et contra Gibbon's views enable them to coherently parse and argue analogous debates.

    The smart humanities graduates I know are bond traders (philosophy), lawyers (history, linguistics), bankers (English), marketing executives (classics), journalists (political science), and business owners (women's studies). The stupid ones serve coffee, just like the stupid engineers and computer scientists who work in tech support. The problem is that universities have allowed many more of the stupid to graduate from humanities programs than they have from STEM programs. It gives the rest of us a bad name.

    Let's focus on the problem with humanities - the decline of academic rigour. And let's focus on the problem with universities - mass enrolment for profit. If we keep pretending that everyone should be going to university, and the trend of rising STEM enrolment continues, then it won't be long before standards in STEM subjects start to fall. Do your non-genius kids a real favour - let them study a trade.

  12. Re:Finally! by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait, so how did the story end? Are you posting this from inside a dumpster behind a McDonald's with free WiFi, or what?