Slashdot Mirror


EU Backs Ending Daylight Saving Time (theguardian.com)

New submitter Zarhan writes: Earlier this summer, European Commission conducted a poll on whether EU citizens would like to abolish adjusting their clocks twice a year. The results are now in: 80% of the respondents want to get rid of the changes every spring and autumn. EU Commission is planning to follow through and abolish the practice. In EU, individual countries decide what timezone they belong in, but the clock adjustment is an EU-level decision. The recommendation for now is to stick to summer time year-round, although individual countries will make those decisions. More from DW. The changes are known to affect sleep patterns and causes loss in productivity and even heart attacks, especially when you lose one hour of sleep during the spring change. "I will recommend to the commission that, if you ask the citizens, then you have to do what the citizens say," said Jean-Claude Juncker, the commission's president. "We will decide on this today, and then it will be the turn of the member states and the European parliament."

33 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. well now ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I will recommend to the commission that, if you ask the citizens, then you have to do what the citizens say," said Jean-Claude Juncker, the commission's president.

    Well now, don't be hasty; this is the EU ... that "do what the citizens say" stuff sounds dangerously like democracy or something.

    1. Re:well now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No need to be concerned, look at the conditional. "If you ask the citizens," this just means that they will not to ask the citizens about anything that isn't trivial.

    2. Re:well now ... by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Almost like that sleazy socialist idea of helping others, instead of taking what you want. One guy tried to make that popular. Long bearded hippy. I believe he is a South American. People wear his t-shirts, unknowing how many people died because of him.

      Called Jesus, or something else Mexican.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:well now ... by Dorianny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The EU commissioners are chosen by the elected governments of each State just like U.S Senators were before the 13th amendment. Any proposed law has to be approved by the EU parliament which is directly elected. The big problem with the EU is that politicians have found it very easy to blame their failures on the "faceless EU technocrats" instead of owning up to them. Italian politicians even blamed the EU for the recent bridge collapse in Genoa

    4. Re:well now ... by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you are confusing Socialism with Communism.

      It is an easy mistake to make, because most people are ignorant idiots.
      Socialism is in free market economies with democracy. However there are more regulations and wider government funding for public good initiatives.
      While Communism is the government having direct control of everyone's lives.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:well now ... by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stop using facts!

    6. Re: well now ... by bestweasel · · Score: 2

      By the same token, Churchill was almost always drunk and he did OK.

    7. Re:well now ... by dremon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > While Communism is the government having direct control of everyone's lives.

      Where did you get that? Communism by definition is the lack of supreme authority and state. The fact that some states where thought of being 'communistic' doesn't make them so, it's oxymoron to be a 'communistic state', it's like a 'humanistic nazism'.

    8. Re:well now ... by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Permanent Daylight savings time is nothing else than moving your time zones by one, or renaming 12 o'clock into 1 o'clock. In the end, it's the same with another name. Why not just get up one hour early? That's exactly what "permanent Daylight savings time" means.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    9. Re:well now ... by balbeir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I live in a "socialist" country and things aren't that bad.

      The problem with socialism is that at some point, the government will run out of other people's money to spend.

      When you run out of good arguments, there is always Thatcher to quote...

    10. Re:well now ... by Excelcia · · Score: 2

      Because you're not going to be able to mandate shifting the schedule of every person on the continent. Because even if you could legislate that, doing so would have a cost in the millions or billions.

      Most people love having the extra daylight at the end of the work day rather than the beginning, even in the winter. So, assuming you have the goal of shifting an hour, what's easier, shift to daylight savings time one summer and never switch back, or redo, reprint, and sort out the logistical nightmare of switching every schedule on the continent by an hour?

    11. Re:well now ... by MisterSquid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not just get up one hour early? That's exactly what "permanent Daylight savings time" means.

      That is not what permanent Daylight Saving Time means.

      For one, Daylight Saving Time (not SavingS) is when clocks move one hour forward, not backward, which means getting up one hour early is in the wrong direction. Daylight Saving Time has people waking up one hour later.

      Second, and more importantly, Daylight Saving Time is when an entire geographic region coordinates its entire sociopolitical, economic, and manufacturing infrastructure (and their interdependencies) to shift production to be one hour later for a period of about 8 months. When Daylight Saving Time ends, all that infrastructure is then shifts its production to one hour earlier.

      Saying "set your individual clock to be one hour later is the same as Daylight Saving Time" is like saying you can catch a plane earlier by simply moving your watch to be one hour later. Do that and you're going to miss your plane.

      If you go in the other direction, you're going to end up wasting an hour at every single appointment you make, which I suppose is better than missing your plane..

      In any case changing your personal clock ain't Daylight Saving Time. Daylight Saving Time is delaying an entire geographical area's political, social, and economic productivity by one hour.

      --
      blog
    12. Re:well now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      you still sound confused and wrong. Let me help:

      DST was invented to have people get up *earlier* during the summer so that they could work *longer hours* during the day. Your corrected sentence says that "[DST] is when clocks move one hour backward"... umm....

      DST is the *summer* time, not the *winter* time. The way to remember the clock movements is easy: "spring forward" and "fall back". I'm guessing you got that part right, but at some point confused yourself into twisting DST from being *summer* to being *winter*.

      Anyone who has to deal with timestamps is all too familiar with all of this nonsense and doing away with it is the best thing. But for some silly reason, everyone wants to "eliminate it" by eliminating *standard* time. For example, Florida is set to rule DST year round. The smart thing to do would be to just put themselves on Atlantic time, but that would be like acknowledging how stupid the proposal is. Similarly, this EU story is about making DST permanent. Sigh.

      ah, how appropriate for confusing DST or wanting DST to replace standard time... captcha is 'deluded'. Or maybe that's just me thinking that anyone cares :)

    13. Re:well now ... by jittles · · Score: 3, Informative

      Permanent Daylight savings time is nothing else than moving your time zones by one, or renaming 12 o'clock into 1 o'clock. In the end, it's the same with another name. Why not just get up one hour early? That's exactly what "permanent Daylight savings time" means.

      Because I have core hours that I have to be in the office for. So getting up an hour early does not mean I get to go home an hour earlier. It just means I have an extra hour at home before I go to the office. Not the same thing at all when businesses may not be open during that extra hour.

    14. Re:well now ... by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      Yep, it certainly is easier to redo the business hours for every company in the country, replace the door signs, etc. Also, if the business hours are written into contracts, then the contracts need changing etc.

      Or, we can just say that now we are at GMT+3 instead of GMT+2...

    15. Re:well now ... by Interfacer · · Score: 2

      There is a difference between asking the population for non binding input on a specific issue, and a binding referendum on something that is essentially a large constitutional change without even saying in advance what exactly you are voting for.

      The problem with the brexit referendum was that they only required a simple majority while a normal constitutional change would require a 2/3. And there was no definition of what the desired output was. It was essentially a vote to exit the EU without any plan, and without any agreement on which conditions to negotiate for. It was a victory for populism and a loss for informed democracy.

  2. Enough already! Have DST, don't have DST ... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just pick one and stay with it. This endless debate is wasting too much time --- time which could be far better spent trying to understand why we park cars on driveways.

  3. Ditch DST, no "permanent" DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an EU citizen I commented on this and argued for abolishing the DST and keep standard time.

    Staying in permanent "summer time" just means you are in another timezone than you claim. So that is plain stupid. Now you don't only have to know which time zone a country is in, you also have to know if they decided to be in permanent summer time or use the normal time associated with the time zone.

    So, ditch the DST and let the countries decide what time zone they want to be in. NO SUMMER TIME ALLOWED! The effect is the same but it will be a heck lot easier for travelers or people communicating across time zones.

    1. Re:Ditch DST, no "permanent" DST by Squeak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being permanently on summer time means, of course, that Greenwich will never be on Greenwich Mean Time. Something sounds a little wrong with that to me.

      --
      This sig is a figment of your imagination.
    2. Re:Ditch DST, no "permanent" DST by Athanasius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to be stridently against any form of DST. Then I realised that one thing that being +1 achieves is to move the middle of business hours closer to local solar noon. 09h->17h is offset exactly one hour, add in DST and local 09h is now solar 08h, likewise 17h -> 16h, and you have properly distributed the available daylight either side of the middle of the business hours. Obviously business hours aren't as fixed as this, in the UK often being 09:00->17:30 or even until 18:00, so it's not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction.

      And doing this with permanent DST is easier than trying to get all schools and businesses to actually shift their hours around.

      And that's why, when I filled in the EU questionnaire, I expressed a preference for what has turned out to be the majority opinion.

      For those parts (latitude bands) of the world where DST can possibly make a difference to the amount of daylight at either end of the day there's too little of it in the depths of Winter anyway! Further north than that has too little and this is a change for no good reason, and further south there's no need as they maintain enough daylight hours even in Winter.

    3. Re:Ditch DST, no "permanent" DST by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Staying in permanent "summer time" just means you are in another timezone than you claim. So that is plain stupid. Now you don't only have to know which time zone a country is in, you also have to know if they decided to be in permanent summer time or use the normal time associated with the time zone.

      Don't be stupid. They have names for timezones that basically eliminate all of your complaints. If you're judging this on anything other than how complicated it is to change the clock or what time the sun rises and sets then you're waaaaay overthinking it.

    4. Re:Ditch DST, no "permanent" DST by fisted · · Score: 2

      This is an EU thing, not a GB thing. Greenwich won't be affected.

    5. Re:Ditch DST, no "permanent" DST by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

      In the U.S. we deal with this all day, every day, across three time zones. There are a fair number of people crossing the border between Eastern and Central time to go to or from work every day, which would be directly analogous to the Irish situation, but we have the effect magnified and things still more or less function. A one hour offset between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland would be a nuisance but not a major problem in the grand scheme of things, and shouldn't be a high priority in the decision-making process.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  4. Re:Enough already! Have DST, don't have DST ... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The endless debate isn't wasting as much time as we've already wasted on my work project, trying to answer the question of "if someone schedules a field test to happen every day, do they mean every 24 hours, or at the same time each day?" We've probably had a half dozen meetings so far to try dealing with timezone and Daylight Saving Time issues.

  5. Re:Enough already! Have DST, don't have DST ... by mccalli · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's literally what this is doing. I commented in favour of scrapping changing - I'm in the UK, so by the time this happens it won't automatically apply to me. I do hope we follow suite here though.

  6. Boondoggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Daylight savings time is a classic government boondoggle: a completely useless (at best) project that only got off the ground because (1) they weren't spending their own time or money on it, so there was nothing to lose, and (2) somebody identified a chance to engineer their own legacy.

    Get rid of it. I personally am in favor of staying permanently on standard time, since where I live DST means getting up in the dark and going to bed in the light (which is ass backwards according to human nature).

  7. Democracy? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2, Informative

    stuff sounds dangerously like democracy or something

    Rest assured. These polls are not known to the average European citizen. Only lobby groups check them, or mobilize others to check them. At no point was there a referendum or something like that.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Democracy? by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Rest assured. These polls are not known to the average European citizen. Only lobby groups check them, or mobilize others to check them. At no point was there a referendum or something like that.

      80% of the votes where from Germany, probably because the main German public news website actually bothered to publish a story on this poll and provided links to the EU website. This is how I learned of it and why I participated.

      If I hadn't read the article in the news, I would have had no idea.

  8. The Great White North by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here in Canada there is a push in some regions to abolish daylight saving time. Parts of the country (e.g. Saskatchewan) are already sane about this. Ditto the northeast corner of B.C.

    Even at my relatively southerly latitude (49 degrees north) summers are light regardless of our nominal time zone. Winters are dark, again, regardless of our time zone. If we stayed on PST (UTC-8) all year the sun would set at 2030 in the summer. What more do people want? And on PDT all year (UTC-7) the sun would still set at 1700 in December. What good is that? It wouldn't rise until 0900. Ugh.

    ...laura

  9. Historically, it was used to conserve coal use by Lucas123 · · Score: 4, Informative

    While many believe DST was started for farming, in fact, most farmers don't like it. Historically, DST began in 1916, when the German Empire and its World War I ally Austria-Hungary introduced it as a way to conserve coal during wartime. Britain, most of its allies, and many European neutrals soon followed suit. Russia and a few other countries waited until the next year, and the United States adopted daylight saving in 1918. Broadly speaking, most jurisdictions abandoned daylight saving time in the years after the war ended in 1918 (with some notable exceptions including Canada, the UK, France, and Ireland). However, many different places adopted it for periods of time during the following decades and it became common during World War II. It became widely adopted, particularly in North America and Europe, starting in the 1970s as a result of the 1970s energy crisis.

    1. Re:Historically, it was used to conserve coal use by Translation+Error · · Score: 2

      I have no idea why people think it's for the benefit of farmers. Of all people, they're the ones whose days are ruled by the sun and the cycles of animals rather than the clock. Anyone with pets that expect to be fed at the same time each morning knows just how much animals respect the clock suddenly saying it's another hour until feeding time.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  10. Re:Kick it while it's down! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is if you live north of 35 degrees, like most of Europe, it doesn't matter if there is DST or not, there is simply too many hours of daytime in the summer and not enough in the winter.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  11. Abolish Timezones while you are at it. by zoid.com · · Score: 2

    I don't care if I go to work at 0600 hours or 1700 hours. Timezones are stupid. The military figured this out years ago.